Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Central Cholinergic Synapse: A Primer

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

14 September 2025

Posted:

17 September 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Central cholinergic systems are under intensive study in neurophysiology and neuro-pharmacology. The present review serves to introduce central cholinergic function with a focus on the synthesis of acetylcholine from glucose, acetyl-CoA and choline, mediated by choline acetyltransferase; the transport of choline by the high-affinity choline uptake sys-tem; its packaging in vesicles by the vesicular acetylcholine transporter; and its break-down by cholinesterases. I also briefly discuss muscarinic and nicotinic receptors and the significance of cholinergic synapses in brain diseases, especially dementia.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Central cholinergic pathways are often in the focus of neuroscience because they are associated with a wide variety of brain functions and diseases [1]. Cholinergic interneurons in the striatum contribute to motor control whereas cholinergic projection neurons that originate in the basal forebrain and innervate hippocampus and cortex take part in cognitive and attentional functions [2]. Cholinergic fibers originating in the pontine formation control REM sleep and are part of the reticular activating system that coordinates the sleep-wake rhythm. Many other functions have been ascribed to central cholinergic pathways, such as control of mood, participation in epileptic seizures and in drug addiction; in fact, hardly a brain function is known that is not influenced, at least in part, by cholinergic activity [3]. In the light of these numerous functions, an understanding of the cholinergic synapse is of paramount importance for the biomedical researcher. While the field moves forward with new techniques and approaches, such as novel biosensors or bioinformatics, the present paper attempts to summarize salient findings of the neurochemistry of cholinergic synapses to help the cholinergic newcomer with orientation.

2. The Cholinergic Phenotype

Central cholinergic neurons express a limited number of specific cholinergic proteins that include choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the enzyme that synthesizes acetylcholine (ACh); the choline carrier CHT-1 which mediates high-affinity choline uptake (HACU); and the vesicular ACh transporter VAChT. In the brain, cholinergic neurons also express the majority of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), the enzyme that terminates cholinergic action whereas butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), an enzyme that can act as a back-up for AChE, is expressed by glial cells. The gene for VAChT is included in the first exon of ChAT, and both proteins show a similar developmental pattern, hence this arrangement has been called the “cholinergic gene locus”. The ontogeny of cholinergic neurons and the transcription factors involved in the expression of the cholinergic phenotype have been studied in some detail but are not discussed here (for review, see [4]).
While AChE is widely distributed in the brain and has been used to map neuronal pathways [5], mainly ChAT has been used to localize ACh-synthesizing cells in the body; selective antibodies to ChAT and GFP-coupled ChAT have been used in these endeavours [6]. It should be noted that prominent ChAT-positive cells in the periphery include cholinergic neurons in the autonomic nervous system and spinal neurons that control movement. Moreover, several types of non-neuronal cells that form and secrete ACh have been described [7]; however, in the brain, the presence of ChAT identifies a cholinergic neuron.

2.1. Synthesis and turnover of ACh

ChAT forms acetylcholine (ACh), the cholinergic transmitter, from acetyl-CoA and choline (Fig. 1). ChAT isoforms reside in the cytoplasm, but can also be nuclear or membrane-associated. Their expression follows cholinergic pathways; in the brain, ChAT expression levels are high in the striatum, moderate in hippocampus and cortex and low in cerebellum. ChAT exists in various splice variants, and several phosphorylation events which have modest effects on overall activity [8,9]. ChAT has relatively high Km values for its substrates, acetyl-CoA (ca. 10 µM) and choline (ca. 400 µM); these values are higher than the intracellular levels of acetyl-CoA (around 5 µM) and choline (estimated at 50 µM), therefore, an increase of substrate availability in the synaptic ending leads to an increase of ACh synthesis. In other words, ChAT activity is not considered rate-limiting for ACh synthesis [10]. In experimental studies, strong elevations of ChAT activities are observed during brain development but are unlikely in adults whereas reductions of ChAT expression or activity in the brain are usually indicative of cholinergic cell death, e.g. in stroke or dementia.
The availability of precursors can be rate-limiting for ACh synthesis, especially because ACh has a very high turnover rate (see below). Unlike most transmitters, ACh is inactivated by enzymatic cleavage (AChE) in the synaptic cleft. Therefore, it must be continuously re-synthesized in cholinergic terminals. The turnover rate of ACh has been estimated at 6 nmol/g brain tissue per minute. As brain contains only 20 nmol/g ACh, the total pool of ACh is replaced within little more than three minutes. This turnover rate for ACh is at least 30fold higher than that for catecholamines which are inactivated by cellular uptake and recycled [11]. Hence, the availability of ACh precursors is pivotal for cholinergic function.
The complete knockout of the ChAT gene is lethal in mice, mainly because skeletal muscle function fails, e.g. for breathing. Hemizygous mice develop quite normally, however, and only show limited performance in motor exercises. In the brain of hemizygous mice, ACh synthesis is normal but increased HACU activities point to a compensatory increase of cholinergic firing to sustain normal ACh levels [12]. In humans, mutations in ChAT, but also in the genes for AChE and the nicotinic receptor of skeletal muscle, are associated with congenital myasthenic syndromes [13}.

2.2. Precursors: Acetyl-CoA

Acetyl-CoA in the brain is mainly formed by glycolysis. Glucose is the major fuel of the brain [14]. The brain has only limited stores of glycogen in astrocytes and does not sustain gluconeogenesis, hence glucose must be taken up from blood plasma [15]. Its plasma concentration is 4-6 mM, and it is transported into the brain by glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) which is located at brain endothelial cells and has a very high Km value (11 mM), i.e. increases of plasma glucose cause increased influx of glucose into the brain. Brain extracellular levels of glucose are only 1-2 mM, however, due to rapid cellular uptake of glucose. While glucose can enter neurons directly through the GLUT3 transporter, much glucose is taken up by astrocytes via the GLUT1 transporter and is converted to lactate through glycolysis. Lactate freely leaves the astrocyte through MCT transporters, can be taken up by neurons and used for energy production [16]. While glycolysis occurs in the cytoplasm, acetyl-CoA is formed from pyruvate in mitochondria and must be transported back into the cytosol. Acetyl-CoA reaches the cytosol with the help of certain carriers, e.g. acetyl-CoA is fused with oxaloacetate to citrate in the mitochondria, exported as citrate, and citrate is cleaved in the cytoplasm by ATP-citrate lyase to yield acetyl-CoA. In addition, acetate (which is formed by AChE) can be taken up by cholinergic neurons, but the relevance of this pathway is probably low in mammalian brain [10].
Pyruvate oxidation to acetyl-CoA is an efficient process in mitochondria, hence glucose availability and acetyl-CoA formation are rarely rate-limiting for ACh synthesis. During cerebral ischemia, ACh synthesis is reduced, however, this may be due to general energy failure. Severe, isolated hypoglycemia induced by insulin injections did not affect ACh release. Glucose can become limiting for cholinergic function when ACh synthesis is increased, e.g. during behavioral stimulation of cholinergic fibres [17,18]. When rats performed a demanding cognitive task, glucose levels in the hippocampus were reduced and ACh release was increased by glucose administration [19]. These studies show that the availability of glucose can vary and may influence ACh synthesis under stimulatory conditions.

2.3. Precursors: Choline

ACh and choline are minor choline metabolites with respect to abundance in the brain. The brain contains approx. 25,000 nmol/g choline bound in phospholipids (see below) and about 1,000 nmol/g in soluble cytoplasmic choline metabolites, mainly phosphocholine (PCh) and glycerophosphocholine (GPC). In comparison, the brain concentrations of choline are ca. 30 nmol/g, and of ACh approx. 20 nmol/g [20]. These numbers already suggest that choline and ACh levels are dynamically regulated, with phospholipids as back-up to supply additional choline when needed [21].
One note of caution is required. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain shows a “choline” peak that is often misinterpreted in the literature. In fact, neither the immobile phospholipids nor the minute amounts of choline and ACh contribute much to this signal. Instead, the cytosolic metabolites phosphocholine (ca. 300 µM) and glycerophosphocholine (GPC; ca. 600 µM) represent the majority of the “choline” signal in MRI imaging. Phosphocholine is formed both during phospholipid synthesis and breakdown. GPC, in contrast, is only formed during the breakdown of PC which is initiated by phospholipase A(2) activation. GPC levels can be used as a marker of PC breakdown [22], and GPC levels are increased in neurodegenerative disease due to extensive membrane breakdown [23].
Choline has a plasma concentration of approx. 10 µM; depending on dietary intake, this value can range from 5 µM (choline-deficient diet) to 40 µM after a choline-rich meal. Choline is not considered a vitamin because choline can be synthesized in the liver (by threefold methylation of phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, PE, yielding phosphatidylcholine, PC), and choline can be released from PC by the action of phospholipases. However, choline synthesis depends on a sufficient supply of C1-bodies and folate, and a choline-deficient diet produces fatty liver disease and, ultimately, liver cancer [21,24]. The brain does not synthesize choline in appreciable amounts and is dependent on choline uptake from blood. It should be noted that much recent work on choline has focused on its role in brain development, and supplementation of choline during pregnancy and lactation was reported to enhance brain function in the adult [25].
The entry of choline into the brain occurs via a transporter at the blood-brain barrier which has a high Kd, i.e. it transports choline more rapidly when plasma choline levels rise [26]. The brain takes up choline when choline levels are high (>14 µM in the rat) but releases choline between meals when plasma choline levels are low [27]. Free choline levels in the brain extracellular space are relatively low at 3-5 µM, and they do not change much even when large doses of choline are administered. The main reason for this phenomenon is the rapid cellular uptake and subsequent phosphorylation of choline [28]. Due to its quaternary nitrogen atom, choline has a permanent positive charge. As a cation, it is drawn into cells which carry a negative membrane potential. In nerve cells, at -70 mV, choline would be expected to reach a 16-fold higher intracellular vs. extracellular concentration according to the Nernst equation [10]. Interestingly, the concentration of free choline (approx. 20 nmol/g brain) suggests a cytosolic concentration of 50-60 µM which is indeed 12-15fold higher than the extracellular concentration of approx. 4 µM. The dependence of choline dynamics on membrane potential is illustrated by the fact that choline is rapidly released from synaptosomes when the membrane potential is reduced, e.g. by KCl [29].
Choline enters all brain cells through transport systems, the so-called low-affinity choline uptake (LACU), without requiring an additional energy source. Choline that is taken up by the LACU is mainly used for the synthesis of choline-containing phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine (PC; brain concentration: 20 µmol/g) and sphingomyelin (SM; brain concentration: 4 µmol/g). Cholinergic neurons additionally express a high-affinity uptake system (HACU; see below). As the concentration of phospholipids and other choline metabolites in CSF is low, free choline is the only compound that moves freely through the barriers such as endothelia and ependymal cells [20].
The metabolic constraints ensure that free choline is dynamically regulated between choline released from ACh and choline released from phospholipids. The latter can occur through the activation of phospholipases D1 and 2 which respond to a variety of receptors and other stimuli [30]. Under pathological conditions (e.g. convulsions, ischemia), phospholipase A2 is activated and breaks down PC and other phospholipids, forming GPC and free choline [22]. As ACh turnover is much more rapid than phospholipid turnover, the release of choline from ACh (approx. 6 nmol/g/min) is of the same magnitude as that from PC whereas SM in myelin is turned over rather slowly with a half-life of more than two weeks.
Figure 1. The cholinergic synapse. Fig. 1 Major players in the cholinergic synapse: choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) synthesizes acetylcholine (ACh) from acetyl-CoA (delivered from mitochondria via glycolysis) and choline (taken up from extracellular space). Low-affinity choline carriers are ubiquitous while a high-affinity carrier (HACU) mediates choline uptake for ACh synthesis. ACh is transported into synaptic vesicles by a proton-dependent transporter (the vesicular ACh transporter, VAChT), and vesicles are released upon depolarization and calcium influx. Freshly released ACh interacts with muscarinic (mAChR) and nicotinic (nAChR) receptors pre- and postsynaptically. Hydrolysis of ACh by acetylcholinesterase (AChE) terminates the action of ACh.
Figure 1. The cholinergic synapse. Fig. 1 Major players in the cholinergic synapse: choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) synthesizes acetylcholine (ACh) from acetyl-CoA (delivered from mitochondria via glycolysis) and choline (taken up from extracellular space). Low-affinity choline carriers are ubiquitous while a high-affinity carrier (HACU) mediates choline uptake for ACh synthesis. ACh is transported into synaptic vesicles by a proton-dependent transporter (the vesicular ACh transporter, VAChT), and vesicles are released upon depolarization and calcium influx. Freshly released ACh interacts with muscarinic (mAChR) and nicotinic (nAChR) receptors pre- and postsynaptically. Hydrolysis of ACh by acetylcholinesterase (AChE) terminates the action of ACh.
Preprints 176714 g001

2.4. Choline and ACh release

Acute administration of choline increases ACh release in the striatum but does not affect hippocampal or cortical levels. However, choline administration also increases hippocampal and cortical ACh release under conditions of rapid turnover. When ACh release was stimulated by pharmacological or behavioral means (e.g. by atropine, scopolamine or seizures), precursor loading through a choline-rich diet as well as acute choline supplementation increased ACh release in microdialysis studies (see [31] and references cited therein). On the other hand, a choline-deficient diet reduced hippocampal, but not striatal ACh release after scopolamine injection [32]. Moreover, when plasma choline is drastically reduced by the intravenous injection of choline oxidase, clear-cut reductions of ACh release can be seen [33]. Summarizing, choline levels are kept rather constant in the brain through various metabolic and transport mechanisms, but effects of choline availability on ACh release can be demonstrated during stimulated release of ACh.
The local dynamics of free choline in the synaptic area are not fully understood. In striatum, an area of relatively dense cholinergic innervation, the levels of choline fall when ACh is released, and vice versa [34]. In hippocampus and cortex, however, this balance is not observed, and in fact choline levels often fall much more strongly than would be expected from the increase of ACh [35]. Here, choline levels may be (slowly) supplemented by phospholipid hydrolysis, and in fact, phospholipase D activity (which liberates free choline from PC) was shown to be stimulated by various receptors including muscarinic ACh receptors [30]; thus, ACh may mobilize its own precursor, albeit in a slow fashion. In the vicinity of the cholinergic synapse, the recycling of choline from ACh predominates as is shown by the fact that hemicholinium-3 (HC-3), an effective inhibitor of HACU, almost completely blocks ACh release. The high efficiency of choline uptake in the perisynaptic area was demonstrated using choline biosensors. Newly released choline is cleared from the extracellular space within seconds (at approx. 2.3 µM/s), and this clearance is significantly delayed when HACU is blocked [36].

2.5. High-affinity choline uptake (HACU)

As a permanently charged molecule, choline can enter cells exclusively through membrane-bound choline transporters. High- and low-affinity carriers for choline have been described [37]. The low-affinity uptake system is present in all cells mainly to supply choline for phospholipid synthesis; the responsible transporter(s) have a Kd for choline of approx. 30 µM. They belong to the SLC family (e.g., SLC44A1), particularly the organic cation (OCT) transporter family [38]. The recently described transporter FLVCR may be the elusive low-affinity choline carrier at the blood-brain barrier [21].
The HACU system, represented by the choline transporter CHT-1 (SLC5A7) [39], is strictly sodium-dependent which means that it uses ATP-dependent processes – in addition to choline´s charge – to transport choline into the synaptic cytosol against a concentration gradient [40]. The transport mechanism has recently been described in molecular detail [41]. The CHT-1 transporter has a very high affinity for choline (Kd=1-2 µM) and guarantees that choline – and especially the choline released locally by the action of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) – is preferentially imported into cholinergic nerve endings for the ongoing synthesis of ACh.
The activity of the high-affinity choline transporter, just like ChAT, is modulated by phosphorylation but, more importantly, CHT-1 shows a peculiar behavior because it shuttles between transmitter vesicles (inactive state) and cell membrane (active state) [42]. Cholinergic synaptic vesicles carry CHT-1 in their membrane, and when they fuse with the plasma membrane, some CHT-1 molecules remain there and subsequently transport choline into the synapse. When the firing rate is high, more CHT-1 accumulates in the plasma membrane, increasing choline import, whereas if the firing rate is lowered, CHT-1 molecules slowly return to intracellular vesicles by clathrin-dependent endocytosis where they are inactive (reviewed by [43,44]). This shuttling of the CHT-1 is a relatively slow process, and as a consequence, HACU activity in the synaptic membrane can be measured ex vivo [40]. Even when synaptosomes are isolated in a procedure that takes several minutes, the synaptic HACU values reflect cholinergic firing rate in vivo. For instance, the rate of HACU in the hippocampus will be reduced when rats were pretreated with barbiturates (which reduce cholinergic firing) but it will increase when the cholinergic terminals fired rapidly e.g. after seizures [40]. Summarizing, HACU activity follows the firing rate of cholinergic neurons and reflects central cholinergic activity. This characteristic has often been interpreted to show that HACU is the major rate-limiting step for ACh synthesis, provided that the other members of the cholinergic synapse (ChAT, VAChT and AChE) are intact and work at normal activity levels.
As with ChAT, deletion of the CHT-1 gene in mice is lethal immediately after birth because of respiratory failure. Mice hemizygous for CHT-1 are fertile and appear normal [38]. Closer examination reveals high tissue levels of choline in the brain, but lower levels of ACh corroborating the role of the transporter as choline carrier [45]. Mice show normal behavior but show weaker performances when challenged behaviorally or pharmacologically [36]. Peripherally, mice deficient in CHT-1 have tachycardia and ventricular dysfunction, and they have lower motoric capacity while mice overexpressing CHT-1 have increased motor endurance and less fatigue [46]. Mutations in men have similar consequences. Asians and Ashkenazi Jews have relatively frequent mutations that reduce CHT-1 activity, but serious health consequences have not been reported [37,47]. Inactivating mutations are also lethal in humans [48].

2.6. The vesicular acetylcholine transporter VAChT

The transporter for ACh into cholinergic vesicles, VAChT (SLC18A3), is a large glycoprotein that exchanges ACh for protons. The binding and transport mechanisms have been elucidated by cryo-electron microscopy [49]. VAChT is of pivotal relevance for the functioning of the cholinergic terminals. Inactivating mutations of VAChT are lethal after birth. Mice with partial deficits of the VAChT gene are viable; at 65% reduction of VAChT, neuromuscular problems are evident but at 45% reduction, mice moved normally and could be investigated in behavioral paradigms [50]. These mice showed a significant reduction of cortical ACh release under basal and stimulated conditions and an impairment of cognitive functions (e.g. social recognition; reviewed [51]). The mechanism of ACh release seemed unchanged, and the cholinergic deficit could be corrected by AChE inhibition.
VAChT has a low Km for ACh (approx. 1 mM) and is known to be a slow transporter, and the present data demonstrate that lower levels of VAChT limit cholinergic function due to reduced storage and release of transmitter. In agreement with mouse data, mutations of VAChT in humans lead to myasthenic syndromes [52]. Vice versa, in mice that contained multiple copies of the VAChT gene and displayed increased VAChT expression, ACh release from hippocampal slices was increased [53]. VAChT, therefore, controls the filling of vesicles with ACh but does not interfere with release processes.

2.7. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE)

AChE, the enzyme that terminates the action of ACh, is one of the fastest known enzymes; one molecule of protein hydrolyzes 5-6,000 molecules of ACh per second. It is widely distributed in the brain [5]. During development, AChE is expressed before the other cholinergic genes occur, and a non-cholinergic role e.g. in neuronal migration has been suggested. AChE is not appreciably regulated by phosphorylation, and there are few mutations in the human gene, usually with very mild consequences on enzymatic activity. Large-scale inhibition of AChE is very toxic to any organism (see below), and knockout of the AChE gene is lethal in fruit flies and zebrafish, but not in mice (see below). It should be noted that AChE activity is not easy to measure because many external factors, e.g. the presence of various detergents, strongly influence enzymatic activity [54].
AChE occurs in multiple subtypes, for instance coupled to GPI anchors in erythrocytes or as a 12mer coupled to collagen in the neuromuscular junction. In the CNS where AChE is primarily formed by cholinergic neurons, the majority of AChE molecules occurs as tetramers which are bound to the synaptic membrane by interaction with PRiMA, the proline-rich membrane anchor [55]. AChE can also exist as a monomeric form which can be found in soma and dendrites [56]. A well-studied response is the increase of AChE expression upon exposure to AChE inhibitors. Increased ACh (via muscarinic receptors) increases AChE expression and formation of a stress-induced, “readthrough” form of AChE that occurs as a monomer. This response can also be provoked by psychological stress or by head injury and lasts for several weeks reducing cholinergic signaling in the CNS [57]. The control of AChE expression, e.g. by miR-132, was widely investigated [58,59]. Like ACh, AChE also occurs in non-neuronal cells; its potential roles in neural development, synaptogenesis and immune function deserves further study [59].
Inhibition of AChE is a very common phenomenon. Numerous AChE inhibitors have been described in the plant kingdom, and inhibition of AChE is arguably the most common defense of plants against mammals. Common insecticides as well as nerve gases have anti-AChE activities [3], but some AChE inhibitors also have therapeutic use, including the common anti-dementia drugs donepezil (synthetic), rivastigmine (developed from physostigmine, a plant product) and galanthamine (a plant product).
While AChE inhibitors are lethal in high does, mice that are deficient in AChE surprisingly survive although they are small and seizure-prone and have weak muscles [60]. With adequate (liquid) food, however, they can survive many months. ACh levels are increased manifold [61], but the mice survive because of the presence of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), an enzyme that is secreted by astrocytes and that is able to partly substitute for AChE in ACh hydrolysis [62]. This enzyme probably evolved to protect mammals against plant-derived AChE inhibitors (see above). It is present in high amounts in blood and is often called plasma cholinesterase. Humans harbor many mutations in BChE and, consequently, have variable responses towards AChE inhibitors, this includes some clinically used inhibitors [63].
Mice that lack one functional allele of AChE appear normal although they are more sensitive to AChE inhibitors.. They have only approx. 50% of brain AChE activity and approx. double the amount of extracellular ACh. Further analysis of several mouse species revealed that the extracellular ACh level in mice is inverse to AChE activity, i.e. ACh level = 1/AChE activity [64]. This means that a 50% inhibition of AChE activity would be required to double the endogenous ACh level in the brain.

2.8. Plasticity of cholinergic presynaptic mechanisms

Under normal circumstances, central cholinergic terminals release ACh based on axonal impulse flow which is controlled by neuronal network activity. Glucose and choline are usually in good supply but can become rate-limiting under specific conditions, e.g. during mitochondrial dysfunction in ischemia, but also when neurons are firing rapidly (see above). ChAT activities are not usually rate-limiting, nor is VAChT transport activity although VAChT deficits reduce loading of ACh into vesricles. As discussed above, HACU (mediated by CHT-1) effectively adapts to the cholinergic firing rate by increasing or decreasing its membrane location on a short time scale (minutes). Studies in several transgenic mouse strains revealed cholinergic plasticity that relied on changes of HACU activity. For instance, hemizygous animals that are 50% deficient in ChAT appear largely normal, and ACh release is unchanged. However, they have increase HACU activity which suggests that they compensate low ChAT activity with faster firing and higher ACh turnover [12]. Vice versa, mice with an overexpression of AChE suffer from a reduction of ACh levels that is partially compensated by an increase of HACU and ACh synthesis [65]. Taken together, these examples illustrate an impressive adaptability of central cholinergic fibres to stressful conditions (resilience) [66].
A remarkable example of plasticity was reported in a transgenic mouse strain that lacked PRiMA, the membrane anchor of AChE in the brain [55]. PRiMA deficiency reduces AChE activity by 95% and increases ACh levels by 5-10fold, yet the mice appear normal [67] and do not show signs of cholinergic over-stimulation, such as poor muscle function or seizures. Among the compensatory changes are dysfunctional M2-receptors [68]. Down-regulation of receptors may be an additional pathway how mice adapt to unphysiological high ACh levels.

2.9. Muscarinic ACh receptors

After release from cholinergic terminals, the actions of ACh are mediated via metabotropic (G-protein coupled) muscarinic and ionotropic nicotinic receptors. All five subtypes of muscarinic receptors (mAChR) occur in the brain. Muscarinic M1, M3 and M5 receptors are largely excitatory, lead to the formation of inositol triphosphate and increase calcium in postsynaptic cells. The M1 receptor is the main excitatory receptor in the brain, it is present in post-synaptic membranes on, for instance, GABAergic interneurons and glutamatergic pyramidal neurons.
M2 and M4 receptors are inhibitory receptors, they reduce cAMP and calcium influx and increase potassium conductance thereby hyperpolarizing neurons. M4 receptors predominate in the striatum whereas hippocampal and cortical areas mainly express M2-type muscarinic receptors as presynaptic inhibitory feedback receptors [69]. It must be noted that inhibitory feedback via M2/4 receptors is weak under basal conditions; they limit ACh release only when ACh levels are increased, e.g. in the presence of AChE inhibitors. From microdialysis studies it is known that, at higher levels of AChE inhibition, muscarinic antagonists (usually atropine or scopolamine) cause a several-fold increase of ACh release which is not seen under basal conditions [70,71].

2.10. Nicotinic ACh receptors

Nicotinic receptors (nAChR) are much less abundant in the brain than muscarinic receptors but have high functional significance. Among the several subtypes present in the brain, the alpha4beta2 subtype is the most important because it mediates most of actions of ACh in the brain, e.g. addiction to nicotine in the reward system or appetite suppression in the hypothalamus [1]. The activation of alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors causes strong stimulatory effects on the release of catecholamines (dopamine and noradrenaline) while ACh release is less prominently affected. In addition, the homomeric alpha7-nicotinic receptor is of interest because it has an increased calcium permeability and activates, for instance, glutamatergic responses in hippocampus and cortex [72]. Choline in high concentrations is an agonist at nicotinic alpha7-receptors, however, homeostatic mechanisms such as cellular choline uptake and rapid release from the CSF back into the blood choline make it unlikely that choline reaches the necessary concentrations (>100 µM) that are required for alpha7-receptor activation [15].

2.11. Control of ACh release by presynaptic receptors

In addition to cholinergic receptors (see above), ACh release is also influenced by many other neurotransmitters as shown in numerous studies in brain slices, synaptosomes or in vivo by microdialysis [73,74]. As a rule, centrally depressing drugs such as benzodiazepines and anesthetic gases, but also adenosine reduce ACh release at cholinergic synapses whereas increases are sometimes seen with glutamate, ATP and amines, e.g. serotonin [75]. Striatal cholinergic interneurons show a different behavior, they are activated via glutamatergic fibres and NMDA receptors which are coupled to NO synthesis [76], but they are inhibited by dopaminergic fibres which activate presynaptic D2 receptors on striatal cholinergic terminals (D1 receptors are facilitatory) [77].

2.12. Cholinergic systems and neurological disease

Among diseases of the brain, deficits in central cholinergic signaling were observed most prominently in Alzheimer´s disease (AD). However, cholinergic deficits are also observed in dementia with Lewy bodies and Down syndrome, but not in frontotemporal dementia [2,78]. Cholinergic cell death also occurs in Parkinsons´s and Huntington´s disease, and epileptic seizures up-regulate ACh release at least during status epilepticus [79]. Affective disorders also have a cholinergic component. Both muscarinic and nicotinic agonists were shown to alleviate symptoms of schizophrenia, while the blockade of muscarinic receptors e.g. by scopolamine is beneficial in depression [74]. The reason for the selective vulnerability of central cholinergic neurons remains elusive [80], and novel treatment approaches are still in the testing stage [81].
Alzheimer´s disease is the most intensively investigated neurodegenerative disease, with its hallmarks amyloid deposition, tau aggregation, energy failure and neuroinflammation as potential targets for treatment. However, treatments of neuropathological hallmarks such as amyloid deposition had limited success up to now [82]. Tau aggregation remains a viable target as tau-transgenic mice have cholinergic dysfunction [83,84], and treatment of energy failure and mitochondrial dysfunctions may could be influenced by adequate nutrient and vitamin intake [85,86].
Cholinergic fibres degenerate early in AD, and this phenomenon has gained wide popularity because deterioration of cholinergic function correlates with clinical signs of confusion and memory loss [87,88]. Much effort has been invested in finding a connection between amyloid formation and cholinergic cell death, and practically all of the cholinergic functions discussed in this article were postulated to interact with (intra- or extracellular) amyloid peptides [89]. In amyloid-bearing mice, reductions of ACh release were found in several strains (e.g., [90]), but no major cholinergic dysfunction was seen in mice with lower amyloid burden [71,91]. More recently, transgenic rat models of AD were described that more closely mimic the human situation [92,93].
Irrespective of the elusive etiology of Alzheimer´s disease, central cholinergic dysfunction remains the most druggable characteristic of the disease [87]. AChE inhibitors delay the breakdown of ACh thereby increasing cholinergic tone, while receptor agonists directly induce muscarinic or nicotinic signaling. Nicotinic agonists, however, suffer from possible addictive properties and have not been successfully developed. Muscarinic agonists have been developed, but the muscarinic agonist xanomeline was first introduced as a drug to treat schizophrenia [69]. Of note, full agonists stimulate receptors for many hours and do not reflect the in vivo-situation in which ACh is released on a sub-second time scale and the activation of cholinergic receptors is dynamic [94]. A possible solution to this problem may be the development of partial muscarinic agonists or muscarinic PAMs, i.e. partial allosteric agonists that only facilitate muscarinic receptor activation when ACh is present [69,88].
At present, inhibitors of AChE are still the mainstay of AD therapy. However, pro-cholinergic therapy has adverse side effects in peripheral systems (mainly the vagal nerve) causing e.g. nausea, diarrhea and bradycardia. At tolerable doses, PET studies showed that 20-40% of brain AChE activity are inhibited in patients [88]. Judging from mouse work in which ACh levels have an inverse correlation to AChE activity (see above; [64]), this inhibition would cause a less than two-fold increase of ACh levels in the brain which may be insufficient to improve AD symptoms. Recent attempts to improve on AChE inhibitor therapy include high-dose therapy with retarded formulations or the combination of centrally active AChE inhibitors with non-brain permeable, only peripherally acting muscarinic antagonists to reduce systemic toxicity of AChE inhibitors [95].

3. Conclusions

Central cholinergic neurons express cholinergic genes that determine cholinergic signaling. Severe impairments of cholinergic functions are not compatible with life; loss of ChAT, VAChT or CHT-1 activity in mice causes early death after birth. In humans, mutations of cholinergic genes have been described that lower cholinergic activity; consequences include myasthenic syndromes, difficulties of breathing and possibly some central effects, such as attention disorders or hyperactivity. Cholinergic deficits are particularly prominent in Alzheimer´s disease and inhibition of AChE is the mainstay of therapy. Promising approaches for future therapy include allosteric activators and novel drug combinations. Manipulations of the central cholinergic system may have benefit for dementia, but also for a range of other neurologic and psychiatric diseases.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I thank Sebastian Lobentanzer for putting together Fig. 1 and all my former coworkers for their contributions to the cholinergic field.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACh Acetylcholine
AChE Acetylcholinesterase
BChE Butyrylcholinesterase
ChAT Choline acetyltransferase
HACU High-affinity choline uptake
mAChR Muscarinic ACh receptor
nAChR Nicotinic ACh receptor
PC Phosphatidylcholine
VAChT Vesicular acetylcholine transporter

References

  1. Picciotto, M.R.; Higley, M.J.; Mineur, Y.S. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron 2012, 76, 116-129. [CrossRef]
  2. Ananth, M.R.; Rajebhosale, P.; Kim, R.; Talmage, D.A.; Role, L.W. Basal forebrain cholinergic signaling: development, connectivity and roles in cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2023, 24, 233-251. [CrossRef]
  3. Karczmar, A.G. Exploring the vertebrate central cholinergic nervous system. Springer, New York, USA. 2007.
  4. Abreu-Villaca, Y.; Filguieras, C.C.; Manhaes, A.C. Developmental aspects of the cholinergic system. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 221, 367-378. [CrossRef]
  5. Franklin, K.B.; Paxinos, G. A stereotaxic atlas of the mouse brain. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. 1997.
  6. Keshavarz, M.; Tabrizi, S.F.; Ruppert, A.L.; Pfeil, U.; Schreiber, Y.; Klein, J.; et al. Cysteinyl leukotrienes and acetylcholine are tuft cell cotransmitters. Science Immunol. 2022. [CrossRef]
  7. Perniss, A.; Liu, S.; Boonen, B.; Keshavarz, M.; Ruppert, A.L.; Timm, T.; et al. Chemosensory cell-derived acetylcholine drives tracheal mucociliary clearance in response to virulence-associated formyl peptides. Immunity 2020, 52, 683-699. [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, D.; Hersh, L.B. Choline acetyltransferase: celebrating its fiftieth year. J. Neurochem. 1994, 62, 1653-1663. [CrossRef]
  9. Dobransky, T.; Rylett, R.J. A model for dynamic regulation of choline acetyltransferase by phosphorylation. J. Neurochem. 2005, 95, 305-313. [CrossRef]
  10. Tucek, S. Short-term control of the synthesis of acetylcholine. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1993, 60, 59-69. [CrossRef]
  11. Haubrich, D.R.; Chippendale, T.J. Regulation of acetylcholine synthesis in nervous tissue. Life Sci. 1977, 20, 1465-1478.
  12. Brandon, E.P.; Mellott, T.; Pizzo, D.P.; Coufal, N.; D´Amour, K.A.; Gobeske, K.; et al. Choline transporter 1 maintains cholinergic function in choline acetyltransferase haploinsufficiency. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 5459-5466.
  13. Ohno, K.; Tsujino, A.; Brengman, J.M.; Harper, C.M.; Bajzer, Z.; Udd, B.; et al. Choline acetyltransferase mutations cause myasthenic syndrome associated with episodic apnea in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2017-2022.
  14. Mergenthaler, P.; Lindauer, U.; Dienel, G.A.; Meisel, A. Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 38, 587-597.
  15. Löffelholz, K.; Klein, J. Precursors: choline and glucose. In The Brain Cholinergic System. Giacobini, E., Pepeu, G, Eds. informa/Taylor & Francis, London, UK. 2006; pp. 99-105.
  16. Pellerin, L.; Magistretti, P.J. Sweet sixteen for ANLS. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32, 1152-1166.
  17. Kopf, S.R.; Buchholzer, M.L.; Hilgert, M.; Löffelholz, K.; Klein, J. Glucose plus choline improve passive avoidance behaviour and increase hippocampal acetylcholine release in mice. Neuroscience 2001, 103, 365-371.
  18. Gold, P.E. Acetylcholine modulation of neural systems involved in learning and memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2003, 80, 194-210. [CrossRef]
  19. Ragozzino, M.E.; Unick, K.E.; Gold, P.E. Hippocampal acetylcholine release during memory testing in rats: Augmentation by glucose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4693-4698.
  20. Klein, J.; Gonzalez, R.; Köppen, A.; Löffelholz, K. Free choline and choline metabolites in rat brain and body fluids: sensitive determination and implication for choline supply to the brain. Neurochem. Int. 1993, 22, 293-300.
  21. Kenny, T.C.; Scharenberg, S.; Abu-Remaileh, M.; Birsoy, K. Cellular and organismal function of choline metabolism. Nat. Metabol. 2025, 7, 35-52.
  22. Klein, J. Membrane breakdown in acute and chronic neurodegeneration: focus on choline-containing phospholipids. J. Neural Transm. 2000, 107, 1027-1063. [CrossRef]
  23. Walter, A.; Korth, U.; Hilgert, M.; Hartmann, J.; Weichel, O.; Hilgert, M.; et al. Glycerophosphocholine is elevated in cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer patients. Neurobiol. Aging 2004, 25, 1299-1303.
  24. Zeisel, S.H.; Blusztajn, J.K. Choline and human nutrition. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 1994, 14, 269-296. [CrossRef]
  25. Blusztajn, J.K.; Slack, B.E.; Mellott, T.J. Neuroprotective actions of dietary choline. Nutrients 2017, 9, 815.
  26. Allen, D.D.; Smith, Q.R. Characterization of the blood-brain barrier choline transporter using the in situ rat brain perfusion technique. J. Neurochem. 2001, 76, 1032-1041.
  27. Klein, J.; Köppen, A.; Löffelholz, K. Small rises of plasma choline reverse the negative arterio-venous difference of brain choline. J. Neurochem. 1990, 55, 1231-1236.
  28. Klein, J.; Köppen, A.; Löffelholz, K.; Schmitthenner, J. Uptake and metabolism of choline by rat brain after acute choline administration. J. Neurochem. 1992, 58, 870-876.
  29. Klein, J.; Weichel, O.; Ruhr, J.; Dvorak, C.; Löffelholz, K. A homeostatic mechanism counteracting K+-evoked choline release in adult brain. J. Neurochem. 2002, 80, 843-849.
  30. Klein, J. Function and pathophysiological roles of phospholipase D in the brain. J. Neurochem. 2005, 94, 1473-1487.
  31. Köppen, A.; Klein, J.; Erb, C.; Löffelholz, K. Acetylcholine release and choline availability in rat hippocampus: effects of exogenous choline and nicotinamide. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997, 282, 1139-1145.
  32. Nakamura, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Umegaki, H.; Ikari, H.; Tajima, T.; Endo, H.; Iguchi, A. Dietary restriction of choline reduces hippocampal acetylcholine release in rats: In vivo microdialysis study. Brain Res. Bull. 2001 56 593-597.
  33. Ikarashi, Y.; Takahashi, A.; Ishimarz, H.; Arai, T.; Maruyama, Y. Effects of choline-free plasma induced by choline oxidase on regional levels of choline and acetylcholine in rat brain. Brain Res. Bull. 1993, 32, 593-599.
  34. Ikarashi, Y.; Takahashi, A.; Ishimaru, H.; Arai, T.; Maruyama, Y. Relations between the extracellular concentrations of choline and acetylcholine in rat striatum. J. Neurochem. 1997, 69, 1246-1251. [CrossRef]
  35. Hartmann, J.; Kiewert, C.; Duysen, E.G.; Lockridge, O.; Klein, J. Choline availability and acetylcholine synthesis in the hippocampus of acetylcholinesterase-deficient mice. Neurochem. Int. 2008, 52, 972-978. [CrossRef]
  36. Parikh, V.; Sarter, M.. Cortical choline transporter function measured in vivo using choline-sensitive microelectrodes: clearance of endogenous and exogenous choline and effects of removal of cholinergic terminals. J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 488-453.
  37. Haga, T. Molecular properties of the high-affinity choline transporter CHT1. J. Biochem. 2014, 156, 181-194.
  38. Ojiakor, O.A.; Rylett, R.J. Modulation of sodium-coupled choline transporter CHT function in health and disease. Neurochem. Int. 2020, 140, 104810.
  39. Okuda, T.; Haga, T.; Kanai, Y.; Endou, H.; Ishihara, T.; Katsura, I. Identification and characterization of the high-affinity choline transporter. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3, 120-125.
  40. Kuhar, M.J.; Murrin, L.C. Sodium-dependent, high affinity choline uptake. J. Neurochem. 1978, 30, 15-21.
  41. Qiu,, Y.; Gao, Y.; Huang, B.; Bai, Q.; Zhao, Y. Transport mechanism of presynaptic high-affinity choline uptake by CHT1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2024, 31, 701-709. [CrossRef]
  42. Ferguson, S.M.; Savchenk, V.; Apparsundaram, S.; Zwick, M.; Wright, J.; Heilman, C.J.; et al. Vesicular localization and activity-dependent trafficking of presynaptic choline transporters. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 9697-9709.
  43. Ferguson, S.S.; Blakeley, R.D. The choline transporter resurfaces: New roles for synaptic vesicles? Mol. Intervent. 2004, 4, 22-37.
  44. Ribeiro, F.M.; Black, S.A.; Prado, V.F.; Rylett, R.J.; Ferguson, S.S.; Prado, M.A. The “ins” and “outs” of the high-affinity choline transporter CHT1. J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 1-12.
  45. Bazalakova, M.H.; Wright, J.; Schneble, E.J.; McDonald, M.P.; Heilman, C.J.; Levey, A.I.; Blakely, R.D. Deficits in acetylcholine homeostasis, receptors and behaviors in choline transporter heterozygous mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2006, 6, 411-424.
  46. Holmstrand, E.C.; Lund, D.; Cherian, A.K.; Wright, J.; Martin, R.F.; Ennis, E.A.; et al. Transgenic overexpression of the presynaptic choline transporter elevates acetylcholine levels and augments motor endurance. Neurochem. Int. 2014, 73, 217-228.
  47. Okuda, T.; Okamura, M.; Kaitsuka, C.; Haga, T.; Gurwitz, D. Single nucleotide polymorphism of the human high-affinity choline transporter alters transport rate. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 45315-45322.
  48. Banerjee, M.; Arutyunov, D.: Brandwein, D.; Janetzky-Flatt, C.: Kolski, H.; Hume, S.; et al. The novel p.Ser263Phe mutation in the high-affinity choline transporter 1 (CHT1/SLC5A7) causes a lethal form of fetal akinesia syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2019, 40, 1676-1683.
  49. Ma, Q.; Ma, K.; Dong, Y.; Meng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, R; et al. Binding mechanism and antagonism of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter VAChT. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2025, 32, 818-827.
  50. Prado, V.F.; Martins-Silva, C.; de Castro, B.M.; Lima, R.F.; Barros, D.M:; Amaral, E; et al. Mice deficient for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter are myasthenic and have deficits in object and social recognition. Neuron 2006, 51, 601-612.
  51. Prado, V.F.; Roy, A.; Kolisnyk, B.; Gros, R.; Prado, M.A. Regulation of cholinergic activity by the vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Biochem. J. 2013, 450, 265-274.
  52. O´Grady, G.L.; Verschuuren, C.; Yuen, M.; Webster, R.; Menezes, M.; Fock, J.M.; et al. Variants in SLC18A3, vesicular acetylcholine transporter, cause congenital myasthenic syndrome. Neurology 2016, 87, 1442-1448.
  53. Nagy, P.M.; Aubert, I. Overexpression of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter increased acetylcholine release in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 2012, 218, 1-11.
  54. Zimmermann, M.; Westwell, M.S.; Greenfield, S. Impact of detergents on the activity of acetylcholinesterase and on the effectiveness of its inhibitors. Biol. Chem. 2009, 390, 19-26.
  55. Perrier, A.L.; Massoulie, J.; Krejci, E. PRiMA: the membrane anchor of acetylcholinesterase in the brain. Neuron 2002, 33, 275-285.
  56. Meshorer, E.; Erb, C.; Gazit, R.; Pavlovsky, L.; Kaufer, D.; Friedman, A.; et al. Alternative splicing and neuritic mRNA translocation under long-term neuronal hypersensitivity. Science 2002, 295, 508-512.
  57. Soreq, H. Checks and balances on cholinergic signaling in brain and body function. Trends Neurosci. 2019, 38, 448-458. [CrossRef]
  58. Winek, K.; Lobentanzer, S.; Nadorp, B.; Dubnov, S.; Dames, C.; Moshitzky, G.; et al. Transfer RNA fragments replace microRNAs regulators of the cholinergic post-stroke immune blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 32606-32616. [CrossRef]
  59. Winek, K.; Soreq, H.; Meisel, A. Regulators of cholinergic signaling in disorders of the central nervous system. J. Neurochem. 2021, 158, 1425-1438.
  60. Xie, W.; Stribley, J.A.; Chatonnet, A.; Wilder, P.J.; Rizzino, A.; McComb, R.D.; et al. Prenatal developmental delay and supersensitivity to organophosphate in gene-targeted mice lacking acetylcholinesterase. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 293, 896-902.
  61. Hartmann, J.; Kiewert, C.; Duysen, E.G.; Lockridge, O.; Greig, N.H.; Klein, J. Excessive hippocampal acetylcholine levels in acetylcholinesterase-deficient mice are moderated by butyrylcholinesterase activity. J. Neurochem. 2007, 100, 1421-1429.
  62. Darvesh, S.; Hopkins, D.A.; Geula, C. Neurobiology of butyrylcholinesterase. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4, 131-138.
  63. Duysen, E.G.; Li. B.; Lockridge, O. The butyrylcholinesterase knockout mouse: a research tool in the study of drug sensitivity, bio-distribution, obesity and Alzheimer´s disease. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2009, 5, 523-528.
  64. Mohr, F.; Zimmermann, M.; Klein, J. Mice heterozygous for AChE are more sensitive to AChE inhibitors but do not respond to BuChE inhibition. Neuropharmacology 2013, 67, 37-45.
  65. Erb, C.; Troost, J.; Kopf, S.; Schmitt, U.; Löffelholz, K.; Soreq, H.; Klein, J. Compensatory mechanisms enhance hippocampal acetylcholine release in transgenic mice expressing human acetylcholinesterase. J. Neurochem. 2001, 77, 638-646.
  66. Sarter, M.; Parikh, V. Choline transporters, cholinergic transmission and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 48-56.
  67. Farar, V.; Mohr. F.; Legrand, M.; Lamotte d’Incamps, B.; Cendelin, J.; Leroy, J.; et al. Near complete adaptation of the PRiMA knockout to the lack of central acetylcholinesterase. J. Neurochem. 2012, 122, 1065-1080.
  68. Mohr, F.; Krejci, E.; Zimmermann, M.; Klein; J. Dysfunctional presynaptic M2 receptors in the presence of chronically high acetylcholine levels: data from the PRiMA knockout mouse. PLoS One 2015, 10(10):e0141136.
  69. Tobin, A.B. A golden age of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulation in neurological diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2024, 23, 743-758.
  70. Liu, J.K.; Kato, T. Effect of physostigmine on relative acetylcholine output induced by systemic treatment with scopolamine in in vivo microdialysis of rat frontal cortex. Neurochem. Int. 1994, 24, 589-596.
  71. Hartmann, J.; Kiewert, C.; Klein, J. Acetylcholine release and energy metabolites in amyloid-bearing APPSWE x PSEN1dE9 mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 332, 364-370.
  72. Bouzat, C.; Lasala, M.; Nielsen, B.E.; Corradi, J.; Del Carmen Elsandi, M. Molecular function of alpha7 nicrotinic receptors as drug targets. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 1847-1861.
  73. Fadel, J.R. Regulation of cortical acetylcholine release: insights from in vivo microdialysis studies. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 221, 527-536.
  74. Scarr, E.; Gibbons, A.S.; Neo, J.; Udawela, M.; Dean, B. Cholinergic connectivity: its implications for psychiatric disorders. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 55.
  75. Van Dort, C.J.; Baghdoyan, H.A.; Lydic, R. Neurochemical modulators of sleep and anesthetic states. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2008, 46, 75-104.
  76. Buchholzer, M.L.; Klein, J. NMDA-induced acetylcholine release in mouse striatum: role of NO synthase isoforms. J. Neurochem. 2002, 82, 1558-1560.
  77. Ratna, D.D.; Francis, T.C. Extrinsic and intrinsic control of striatal cholinergic interneuron activity. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2025. [CrossRef]
  78. Pepeu, G.; Giovannini, M.G. The fate of the brain cholinergic neurons in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res. 2017, 1670, 173-184.
  79. Hillert, M.; Imran, I.; Zimmermann, M.; Lau, H.; Weinfurter, S.; Klein, J. Dynamics of hippocampal acetylcholine release during lithium-pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. J. Neurochem. 2014, 131, 42-52.
  80. Kampmann, M. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of selective vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2024, 25, 351-371.
  81. Dejanovic, B.; Sheng, M.; Hanson, J.E. Targeting synapse function and loss for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2024, 23, 23-42.
  82. Burke, J.F.; Kerber, K.A.; Langa, K.M.; Albin, R.L.; Kotagal, V. Lecanumab – looking before we leap. Neurology 2023, 110, 661-665.
  83. Stein, C.; Koch, K.; Hopfeld, J.; Lobentanzer, S.; Lau, H.; Klein, J. Impaired hippocampal and thalamic acetylcholine release in P301L tau-transgenic mice. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 152, 134-142.
  84. Riedel, G.; Klein, J.; Niewiadomska, G.; Kondak, C.; Schwab, K.; Lauer, D.; et al. Mechanisms of anticholinesterase interference with tau aggregation inhibitor activity in a tau-transgenic mouse model. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2020, 17, 1-11. [CrossRef]
  85. Cunnane, S.C.; Trushina, E.; Morland, C.; Prigione, A.; Casadesus, G.; Andrews, Z.B.; et al. Brain energy rescue: an emerging therapeutic concept for neurodegenerative disorders of ageing. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 609–633. [CrossRef]
  86. Viel, C.; Brandtner, A.T.; Weißhaar, A.; Lehto, A.; Fuchs, M.; Klein, J. Effects of magnesium orotate, benfotiamine and a combination of vitamins on mitochondrial and cholinergic function in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1218. [CrossRef]
  87. Hampel, H.; Mesulam, M.M.; Cuello, A.C.; Farlow, M.R.; Giacobini, E.; Grossberg, G.T.; et al. The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer´s disease. Brain 2018, 141, 1917-1933. [CrossRef]
  88. Giacobini, E.; Cuello, A.C.; Fisher, A. Reimagining cholinergic therapy for Alzheimer´s disease. Brain 2022, 145, 2250-2275.
  89. Auld, D.S.; Kar, S.; Quirion, R. ß-Amyloid peptides as direct cholinergic modulators: a missing link? Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21, 43-49.
  90. Bellucci, A.; Luccarini, I.; Scali, C.; Prosperi, C.; Giovannini, M.G.; Pepeu, G.; Casamenti, F. Cholinergic dysfunction, neuronal damage and axonal loss in TgCRND8 mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 23, 260-272.
  91. Hartmann, J.; Erb, C.; Ebert, U.; Baumann, K.H.; Popp, A.; König, G.; Klein, J. Central cholinergic functions in human amyloid precursor protein knock-in/presenilin-1 transgenic mice. Neuroscience 2004, 125, 1009-1017.
  92. Cohen, R.M.; Rezai-Zadeh, K.; Weitz, T.M.; Rentsendorj, A.; Gate, D.; Spivak, I.; et al. A transgenic Alzheimer rat with plaques, tau pathology, behavioral impairment, oligomeric Aß, and frank neuronal loss. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 6245-6256.
  93. DoSarmo, S.; Cuello, A.C. Modeling Alzheimer´s disease in transgenic rats. Mol. Neurodegen. 2013, 8, 37.
  94. Sarter, M.; Lustig, C. Forebrain cholinergic signaling: wired and phasic, not tonic, and causing behavior. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 712-719.
  95. Chase, T.N.; Farlow, M.R.; Clarence-Smith, K. Donepezil plus solifenacin (CPC-201) treatment for Alzheimer´s disease. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 405-416.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated