Submitted:
11 September 2025
Posted:
11 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Background: Candida species are opportunistic fungal pathogens that frequently colonize the gastrointestinal tract of immunocompromised individuals, including people living with HIV (PLHIV). Gastrointestinal Candida colonization has been associated with persistent diarrhea and poor health outcomes. Despite the high burden of HIV/AIDS in Ecuador, there is limited research on Candida prevalence and antifungal resistance patterns in this population. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Candida species in HIV-positive individuals with diarrhea and assess associations with clinical and immunological parameters. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the José Daniel Rodríguez Infectious Hospital in Guayaquil, Ecuador, between April 2021 and May 2022. The study included 85 HIV-positive adults with diarrhea, categorized into those with and without Candida colonization. Fecal samples were analyzed using culture, microscopy (Gram staining, SEM, immunofluorescence), Sabouraud Glucose Agar and CHROMagar™ Candida for species identification. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK® 2 Compact system following EUCAST guidelines. Due to the small sample size, only descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results: The Candida species were detected in 64 of 85 patients (75.3%), with Candida albicans being the most prevalent species. Candida colonization was associated with severely low CD4 counts (<200 cells/µL, 71.0%), high viral loads (≥10,000 copies/mL, 46.6%), and poor ART adherence (55.3%). Antifungal susceptibility testing showed 94.5% fluconazole resistance (SEN1), while all isolates remained 100% sensitive to caspofungin (SEN4, SEN5, SEN6). Conclusions: This study highlights a high prevalence of Candida colonization in HIV-positive individuals with diarrhea, particularly those with advanced immunosuppression and poor ART adherence. The high levels of fluconazole resistance raise concerns about the efficacy of current antifungal treatments, suggesting a need for routine antifungal susceptibility testing. Given the study’s descriptive nature and single-site design, further research with larger, multicentric cohorts is needed to improve clinical management and antifungal stewardship.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
2.2. Study Population
2.3. Data Collection and Laboratory Analysis
2.4. Microbiological analysis of Candida spores
2.5. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
2.6. Variables
2.7. Statistical Analysis
2.8. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Clinical Trial
Consent for publication
Availability of data and material
Competing interests
Funding
Authors’ contributions: Conceptualization
Acknowledgments
References
- Barton-Knott, S. and Karp-Sawey, J. ONUSIDA pide a los líderes que se comprometan en Davos a acelerar el acceso mundial a nuevos y revolucionarios medicamentos de acción prolongada contra el VIH. 2024.
- Cabrera Dutan, K., Wilson Cabrera Dutan, Pinchao Obando, D., and Ordóñez Ortiz, A. Infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana | RECIAMUC. 2021.
- Cajape, A., Cano, A., and Saltos, K. Virus de la Inmunodeficiencia Humana (VIH) efectos y complicaciones adquiridas durante la infección. | Revista Científica Higía de la Salud. 2022.
- Ambe, N.F., Longdoh, N.A., Tebid, P., Bobga, T.P., Nkfusai, C.N., Ngwa, S.B., et al. The prevalence, risk factors and antifungal sensitivity pattern of oral candidiasis in HIV/AIDS patients in Kumba District Hospital, South West Region, Cameroon. The Pan African Medical Journal. 36. 23. 2020.
- Blamey, R., Sciaraffia, A., Piñera, C., Silva, M., Araya, X., Ceballos, M.E., et al. Situación epidemiológica de VIH a nivel global y nacional: Puesta al día. Revista chilena de infectología. 41 (2). 248–58. 2024.
- Ding, Z.-D., Zheng, J.-F., Song, C.-B., Fu, Y.-J., Xu, J.-J., Jiang, Y.-J., et al. Decreased CD4+CD8low T cells in early HIV infection are associated with rapid disease progression. Cytokine. 125. 154801. 2020.
- Maheshwari, M., Kaur, R., and Chadha, S. Candida Species Prevalence Profile in HIV Seropositive Patients from a Major Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India. Journal of Pathogens. 2016 (1). 6204804. 2016.
- Nkenfou, C.N., Tchameni, S.M., Nkenfou, C.N., Djataou, P., Simo, U.F., Nkoum, A.B., et al. Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected and Noninfected Persons in a High Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevalence Region of Cameroon. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 97 (3). 777. 2017.
- Awoyeni, A., Olaniran, O., Odetoyin, B., Hassan-Olajokun, R., Olopade, B., Afolayan, D., et al. Isolation and evaluation of Candida species and their association with CD4+ T cells counts in HIV patients with diarrhoea. African Health Sciences. 17 (2). 322–9. 2017.
- Filler, E.E., Liu, Y., Solis, N.V., Wang, L., Diaz, L.F., John E Edwards, J., et al. Identification of Candida glabrata Transcriptional Regulators That Govern Stress Resistance and Virulence. Infection and Immunity. 89 (3). e00146. 2021.
- Gabaldón, T. and Fairhead, C. Genomes shed light on the secret life of Candida glabrata: not so asexual, not so commensal. Current Genetics. 65 (1). 93. 2018.
- Heestermans, R., Herroelen, P., Emmerechts, K., Vandoorslaer, K., Geyter, D.D., Demuyser, T., et al. Validation of the Colibrí Instrument for Automated Preparation of MALDI-TOF MS Targets for Yeast Identification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 60 (7). e00237. 2022.
- Wang, D., An, N., Yang, Y., Yang, X., Fan, Y., and Feng, J. Candida tropicalis distribution and drug resistance is correlated with ERG11 and UPC2 expression. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 10. 54. 2021.
- Zuza-Alves, D.L., Silva-Rocha, W.P., and Chaves, G.M. An Update on Candida tropicalis Based on Basic and Clinical Approaches. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8. 1927. 2017.
- Nash, A.K., Auchtung, T.A., Wong, M.C., Smith, D.P., Gesell, J.R., Ross, M.C., et al. The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort. Microbiome. 5 (1). 153. 2017.
- Freitas, V.A.Q., Santos, A.S., Zara, A.L.S.A., Costa, C.R., Godoy, C.S. de M., Soares, R. de B.A., et al. Distribution and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolated from people living with HIV/AIDS in a public hospital in Goiânia, GO, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 54 (1). 125. 2022.
- Li, Y.-Y., Chen, W.-Y., Li, X., Li, H.-B., Li, H.-Q., Wang, L., et al. Asymptomatic oral yeast carriage and antifungal susceptibility profile of HIV-infected patients in Kunming, Yunnan Province of China. BMC Infectious Diseases. 13. 46. 2013.
- Salinas, C. CARACTERÍSTICAS CLÍNICAS, MICROBIOLÓGICAS Y DESENLACES DE LA CANDIDIASIS INVASORA EN ADULTOS EN UN HOSPITAL DE ALTA COMPLEJIDAD. 2022.
- Soto, M. REVISIÓN DE LAS CANDIDEMIAS EN LATINOAMERICA. 2019.
- Vásquez-Zamora, K.G., Villalobos-Barboza, K., Vergara Espinoza, M.A., Ventura-Flores, R., Silva-Díaz, H., Vásquez-Zamora, K.G., et al. Frecuencia y susceptibilidad antifúngica de Candida spp. (no C. albicans ) aislada de pacientes de unidades de cuidados críticos de un hospital de tercer nivel del norte del Perú. Horizonte Médico (Lima). 20 (4). 2020.
- Usher, J. Genetic Manipulation of Candida glabrata. Current Protocols. 4 (9). e70014. 2024.






| Category | No Presence (n=21) | Active Presence (n=64) | Total (n=85) |
| Demographics | |||
| Sex | |||
| Female | 4 (17.4%) | 15 (24.2%) | 19 (22.4%) |
| Male | 19 (82.6%) | 47 (75.8%) | 66 (77.6%) |
| Age | |||
| 18-39 | 12 (50.0%) | 27 (43.5%) | 39 (45.9%) |
| 40-59 | 11 (45.8%) | 30 (48.4%) | 41 (48.2%) |
| 60+ | 1 (4.2%) | 5 (8.1%) | 6 (7.1%) |
| City of Residence | |||
| Babahoyo | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Bahia de Caraquez | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Daule | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Duran | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (8.1%) | 7 (8.2%) |
| Esmeraldas | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (8.1%) | 5 (5.9%) |
| Guayaquil | 14 (60.9%) | 38 (61.3%) | 52 (61.2%) |
| Lago Agrio | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Machala | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (1.6%) | 2 (2.4%) |
| Milagro | 1 (4.3%) | 3 (4.8%) | 4 (4.7%) |
| Nobol | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Playas | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Puerto Cayo | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Quevedo | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Riobamba | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (4.8%) | 3 (3.5%) |
| Salitre | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Ventanas | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (3.2%) | 2 (2.4%) |
| Yaguachi | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Marital Status (Married) | |||
| No | 9 (37.5%) | 15 (24.2%) | 24 (28.2%) |
| Yes | 15 (62.5%) | 47 (75.8%) | 62 (72.9%) |
| Education Level | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Primary school | 17 (73.9%) | 37 (59.7%) | 54 (63.5%) |
| High school | 5 (21.7%) | 23 (37.1%) | 28 (32.9%) |
| Higher Education | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (3.2%) | 3 (3.5%) |
| Clinical Characteristics | |||
| Type of Diarrhea | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Acute | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (3.2%) | 3 (3.5%) |
| Chronic | 22 (95.7%) | 60 (96.8%) | 82 (96.5%) |
| Adherence | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Abandoned | 10 (43.5%) | 37 (59.7%) | 47 (55.3%) |
| Continuous | 5 (21.7%) | 12 (19.4%) | 17 (20.0%) |
| Started | 8 (34.8%) | 13 (21.0%) | 21 (24.7%) |
| CD4 | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Severely Low (<200) | 15 (62.5%) | 44 (71.0%) | 59 (69.4%) |
| Moderate (200–349) | 4 (16.7%) | 8 (12.9%) | 12 (14.1%) |
| Normal/High (≥350) | 5 (20.8%) | 10 (16.1%) | 15 (17.6%) |
| Viral Load | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Undetectable/Low (<1,000 copies/mL) | 15 (62.5%) | 31 (53.4%) | 46 (54.1%) |
| High/Very High (≥10,000 copies/mL) | 9 (37.5%) | 27 (46.6%) | 36 (42.4%) |
| Laboratory Results | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Yeasts | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 2 (3.2%) | 25 (29.4%) |
| + | 0 (0.0%) | 35 (56.5%) | 35 (41.2%) |
| ++ | 0 (0.0%) | 20 (32.3%) | 20 (23.5%) |
| +++ | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (8.1%) | 5 (5.9%) |
| Saccharomyces | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 46 (74.2%) | 69 (81.2%) |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 16 (25.8%) | 16 (18.8%) |
| Cryptococcus | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 61 (98.4%) | 84 (98.8%) |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Paras1 | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 21 (91.3%) | 57 (91.9%) | 78 (91.8%) |
| Positive | 2 (8.7%) | 5 (8.1%) | 7 (8.2%) |
| Coli | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 57 (91.9%) | 80 (94.1%) |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (8.1%) | 5 (5.9%) |
| Giardia | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 21 (91.3%) | 61 (98.4%) | 82 (96.5%) |
| Positive | 2 (8.7%) | 1 (1.6%) | 3 (3.5%) |
| Diagnostic Techniques | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Immunofluorescence | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 20 (87.0%) | 49 (79.0%) | 69 (81.2%) |
| Low positivity | 3 (13.0%) | 11 (17.7%) | 14 (16.5%) |
| Moderate positivity | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (3.2%) | 2 (2.4%) |
| TEM Microscopy | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 20 (87.0%) | 49 (79.0%) | 69 (81.2%) |
| Low positivity | 3 (13.0%) | 11 (17.7%) | 14 (16.5%) |
| Moderate positivity | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| High positivity | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| Gram chromotropic | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 20 (87.0%) | 49 (79.0%) | 69 (81.2%) |
| Positive | 3 (13.0%) | 13 (21.0%) | 16 (18.8%) |
| Chromagar | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 49 (79.0%) | 72 (84.7%) |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 13 (21.0%) | 13 (15.3%) |
| Sabouraud | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 46 (74.2%) | 69 (81.2%) |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 16 (25.8%) | 16 (18.8%) |
| Sequencing | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Negative | 23 (100.0%) | 23 (27.1%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (50.0%) | 31 (36.5%) |
| Antifungal Sensitivity | 31 (50.0%) | 31 (36.5%) | |
| SEN1 (Fluconazole) | |||
| Sensitive | – | 4 (6.3%) | 4 (4.7%) |
| Resistant | – | 60 (93.7%) | 60 (70.6%) |
| SEN2 (Itraconazole) | |||
| Sensitive | – | 57 (89.1%) | 57 (67.1%) |
| Resistant | – | 7 (10.9%) | 7 (8.2%) |
| SEN3 (Voriconazole) | |||
| Sensitive | – | 8 (12.5%) | 8 (9.4%) |
| Resistant | – | 56 (87.5%) | 56 (65.9%) |
| SEN4 (Amphotericin B) | |||
| Sensitive | – | 64 (100.0%) | 64 (75.3%) |
| Resistant | – | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| SEN5 (Caspofungin) | |||
| Sensitive | – | 64 (100.0%) | 64 (75.3%) |
| Resistant | – | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Lifestyle | |||
| Any Substance Use | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| No | 13 (54.2%) | 13 (15.3%) | |
| Yes | 11 (45.8%) | 11 (12.9%) | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).