Submitted:
08 September 2025
Posted:
09 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of selected medicinal plants, Datura stramonium (DS), Akokanthera schimperi (AS), and Balanites aegyptiaca (BA) against Escherichia coli(E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) isolated from mastitic cow milk in the West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. These bacterial pathogens are known contributors to bovine mastitis and often exhibit multidrug resistance (MDR). Methods: A laboratory-based experimental study was conducted using clinical isolates and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) standard strains of E. coli and S. aureus. Ethanolic extracts of the three medicinal plants were prepared and tested for antibacterial efficacy using the agar disc diffusion method at a concentration of 350 mg/mL. The diameter of inhibition zones was measured to assess the antimicrobial activity of each plant extract. Results: All three plant extracts exhibited antimicrobial activity against the tested bacterial strains. Akokanthera schimperi (AS) demonstrated the highest antibacterial effect, producing the largest zones of inhibition against both E. coli and S. aureus (18.8 ± 0.03 mm for E. coli, 16.1 ± 0.26 mm for S. aureus), followed by Datura stramonium (DS) (14.8 ± 0.05 mm and 12.1 ± 0.17 mm respectively for E. coli, and S. aureus) and Balanites aegyptiaca (BA) (11.6 ± 0.3 and 7.1 ± 0.12 for E. coli, and S. aureus respectively). The results varied depending on the plant species and the bacterial strain tested. Conclusion: The findings indicate that traditional medicinal plants, particularly Akokanthera schimperi (AS), possess promising antibacterial properties against major mastitis-causing pathogens, E. coli and S. aureus. These results support the potential integration of ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) into mastitis management strategies. Further studies, including phytochemical analysis and in vivo efficacy testing, are recommended.
Keywords:
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Study Area and Design
Plant Selection and Extract Preparation
Antimicrobial Testing
Results and Discussion
Bacterial Isolation and Ethnoveterinary Medicine (EVM) Survey
Antibacterial Activity of Plant Extracts
Comparative Analysis
Conclusion
Author Contributions
Acknowledgements
Conflict of Interest
References
- Finch R, Hunter PA. Antibiotic resistance—action to promote new technologies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):819–21.
- Sharun K, Dhama K, Tiwari R, Gugjoo MB, Iqbal Yatoo M, Patel SK, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of E. coli and S. aureus from mastitic milk. Vet Q. 2021 Dec;41(1):56–68.
- Arbab A, Lee M, Lee H, Park J, Lee S, Park SC. WHO prioritization of bacterial pathogens. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr;11(4):515.
- World Health Organization. Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2002 [cited 2025 April 4]. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67163.
- Jabbar A, Raza MA, Iqbal Z, Khan MN. Ethnoveterinary practices in the Punjab, Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Jul;96(1–2):273–6.
- Tamboura HH, Bayala B, Lompo M, Guissou IP, Sawadogo L. Ethnoveterinary medicine and traditional medicine plants in the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso. Vet Parasitol. 2000 Nov;87(3):291–302.
- Shical J, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Medicinal plant use in Ethiopian traditional veterinary medicine. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2010 Jan;7(1):45–51.
- Hassan MM, Oyewale AO, Amupitan JO, Abdu PA, Okonkwo EM. Phytochemical screening of medicinal plants used in traditional veterinary medicine in Nigeria. J Med Plants Res. 2014 Jan;8(2):125–32.
- Harborne, JB. Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1998. 302 p.
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI document M100-S25. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2015.
- Mohammed A, Boka D, Diriba M. Antibacterial activities of leaf extracts against clinical bacterial isolates. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2018 Jun;12(21):490–5.
- Tadesse S, Mebrahtu A, Wubie M. Antimicrobial activity of Akokanthera schimperi extracts. J Med Plants Res. 2021 Mar;15(3):89–96.
- Demissew S, Asfaw Z, Dagne E. Traditional uses and antimicrobial activity of Balanites aegyptiaca in Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Jan;9(1):26.
| Bacteria | Treatment | Mean ± SD (mm) | Activity | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus (Clinical) | DS | 12.1 ± 0.17 | + | 0.001** |
| AS | 16.1 ± 0.26 | +++ | 0.003** | |
| BA | 7.1 ± 0.12 | + | 0.045* | |
| Amoxicillin | 20.1 ± 0.3 | +++ | 0.0001** | |
| DMSO (5%) | 0 ± 0 | - | - | |
| S. aureus (ATCC 29213) | DS | 14.21 ± 0.1 | ++ | 0.0015** |
| AS | 17.3 ± 0.13 | +++ | 0.002** | |
| BA | 8.6 ± 0.11 | + | 0.04* | |
| Amoxicillin | 22 ± 0.21 | +++ | 0.00001** | |
| DMSO | 0 ± 0 | - | - | |
| E. coli (Clinical) | DS | 14.8 ± 0.05 | ++ | 0.001** |
| AS | 18.8 ± 0.03 | +++ | 0.002** | |
| BA | 11.6 ± 0.3 | + | 0.04* | |
| Amoxicillin | 25.1 ± 0.07 | ++++ | 0.00001** | |
| DMSO | 0 ± 0 | - | - | |
| E. coli (ATCC 25922) | DS | 16.1 ± 0.04 | +++ | 0.001** |
| AS | 20.5 ± 0.02 | +++ | 0.002** | |
| BA | 12.1 ± 0.2 | + | 0.03* | |
| Amoxicillin | 26.2 ± 0.06 | ++++ | 0.00001** | |
| DMSO | 0 ± 0 | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
