Submitted:
02 September 2025
Posted:
03 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Review Literature
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design and Rationale: There Were Three Stages to the Study
3.2. Research Setting and Materials
4. Results and Findings
4.1. Spatial and Demographic Inequalities
4.2. Green Space Proximity and Psychosocial Stress
4.3. Qualitative Approach: Cultural Erosion and Privatization
4.4. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information
4.5. Restrictions on the Validity of Statistics

5. Discussion:
5.1. Case Studies of Yemeni City Urban Challenges

5.2. Analytical Integration and Real-World Consequences
5.3. The Practical Implications Extend Beyond Descriptive Findings






5.4. They Were Not Merely Abstract Indicators
- Spatial segregation: A model of green space interventions in Hadhramaut's heritage districts serves as an example of this shift (refer to the Figure 8). Low-income communities (>1 km from parks) showed 40% higher stress levels (4.1/5 vs. 2.8/5, p < 0.05). Ulrich's stress reduction theory proposes that being in natural environments might facilitate people relax and feel less stressed. The findings provide empirical support for this concept in low-income neighborhoods and urban green spaces.
- Park proximity and mental health: Research suggests a bridge between residential distance from parks and mental health (Sturm & Cohen, 2014). A neighboring urban park provides mental health benefits (Sturm & Cohen, 2014).
- Environmental justice: Because low-income neighborhoods usually face disproportionately high levels of environmental stressors and have limited access to facilities such as parks, this result raises concerns about environmental justice. Addressing the spatial segregation and health inequities the study has observed is closely connected to the Integrated Health-Planning Framework, which the study highlights in the context. Combining public health activities with green infrastructure development can improve the equity and health of urban areas. Finally, the findings reinforce the premise that equitable access to green areas is a critical component of both public health and urban development.
- Mechanisms: Privatization and car-centric layouts create "spatial deserts," exacerbating health inequities. This behavior has been noticed in Cairo's informal settlements (Sims, 2012), but Yemen's turmoil has exacerbated the problem.
- Method: Multivariate regression of social fragmentation drivers in quantitative analysis 2. To identify predictors of social separation (β coefficients, α=0.05), cross-sectional survey data (n=300) was examined using SPSS (v28). Figure 5 shows the accessibility of public squares and open spaces in Yemeni cities, highlighting geographical differences.
- Inequality in income: According to Putnam's (2000) Bowling Alone thesis on economic segregation, low-income tertile inhabitants reported 3.2 times higher odds of social isolation (OR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.8-5.6).
- Age disparities: Similar to Fawaz & Peillen's (2022) findings in crisis neighborhoods in Beirut, young people (18-35 years old) showed lower place attachment (β = 0.28, p = 0.01). Leyden, K. M., Goldberg, A., & Michelbach, P. (2011).
- Green space proximity: Kaplan's (1995) attention restoration theory was supported, with stress (van den Berg, M., 2015) decreasing by 0.8 points (β = -0.32, p < 0.05) for each 100 m reduction in park distance. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2017). Urban design inequities, similar to those seen in Brazil's favelas (Maricato, 2017), are structural predictors of health. However, Yemen's conflict setting introduces new trauma layers that demand trauma-informed design (Brouwer, 2023). Figure 6: Green space deserts are linked to high-stress areas in urban grids (as shown in Figure 6).
| Indicator | Hadhramaut | SDG 11 target | Gap analysis s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green area/capita | 3.2 m² | 15 m² | Critical (78%↓) |
| Pedestrian density | 1.2–5 km/km² | 5 km/km² | Extreme (76%↓) |
| Community regions | <5% | 20% | Emergency |
6. Conclusion
7. Recommendation
7.1. Establish Heritage-Informed Urban Zoning
7.2. Execute Community-Led Micro-Infrastructure Pilot Programs
7.3. Incorporate Trauma-Informed Design Into Curriculum Development
7.4. Establish Spatial Monitoring Systems for Urban Well-Being
Contribution statement
Acknowledgments
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data availability statement
Conflicts of interest
Ethical approval
Data availability statement
Clinical trial registration
References
- Al-Sabahi, K. (2017). Urban heritage in Yemen: Conservation and conflict. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Urban-Heritage-in-Yemen/Sabahi/p/book/9781138280115.
- Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Island Press. https://islandpress.org/books/cities-people.
- Gharipour, M., & Ozlu, N. (Eds.). (2019). Urban heritage in the Middle East: Conservation in contested cities. Routledge. [CrossRef]
- Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/products/237-rebel-cities.
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Bowling-Alone/Robert-D-Putnam/9780743203043.
- Al-Abdali, N., & Porter, G. (2021). Urban challenges in Yemen: A post-conflict perspective. Cities, 112, 103145. [CrossRef]
- Al-Hagla, K. (2019). Cultural heritage as social infrastructure. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 341–360. [CrossRef]
- Al-Homoud, M., & Weizman, E. (2022). Rebuilding trust: Community-led urban recovery in Mosul and Mukalla. Cities, 135, 104451. [CrossRef]
- Al-Murashi, W., Al-Sorimi, A., & Al-Haddad, M. (2023). Green space accessibility in Yemeni cities: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 92, 104501. [CrossRef]
- Arruda, D., Silva, L. A., & Vasconcelos, C. (2020). Participatory design and citizenship: Reclaiming public spaces in Brazilian favelas. Journal of Urban Design, 25(4), 456–473. [CrossRef]
- Brouwer, J. (2023). Post-war urban recovery in the Middle East: Lessons from Yemen. Urban Studies, 60(8), 1459–1476. [CrossRef]
- Connolly, C., & Shiming, L. (2023). Urban green deserts: Mapping recreational inequities in conflict-affected cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 239, 104872. [CrossRef]
- Fabbricatti, K., Bianchi, G., & Citoni, M. (2018). Community-led resilience in post-disaster recovery: A case study of L’Aquila, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 1157–1166. [CrossRef]
- Fawaz, M., & Peillen, I. (2022). Participatory design in crisis zones: Community engagement in Yemen. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 43(2), 245–259. [CrossRef]
- Forsyth, A., & Southworth, M. (2008). Cities afoot—Pedestrians, walkability, and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Izquiel, S., López, M., & García, R. (2019). Transforming war-damaged spaces: Trauma-informed design in post-conflict cities. Urban Studies, 56(12), 2456–2474. [CrossRef]
- Jennings, V., Browning, M., & Rigolon, A. (2024). Urban green spaces and mental health: A global meta-analysis. Health & Place, 82, 103102. [CrossRef]
- Leyden, K. M., Goldberg, A., & Michelbach, P. (2011). Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47(6), 861–888. [CrossRef]
- Maricato, E. (2017). Urban Brazil: Beyond the Planetary City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 681–694. [CrossRef]
- Matan, A. (2017). Rediscovering the pedestrian: Jan Gehl’s influence on modern urbanism. Journal of Urban History, 43(3), 432–449. [CrossRef]
- Nail, T., & Erazo, J. (2018). Social cohesion and public space: Lessons from Quito’s urban parks. Cities, 79, 87–95. [CrossRef]
- Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018). Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: An environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 234–243.
- Sassen, S., & Dotan, N. (2021). Infrastructure decay in divided cities: Beirut, Baghdad, and Sana’a. Urban Studies, 58(14), 2875–2892. [CrossRef]
- Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2017). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Sturm, R., & Cohen, D. (2014). Proximity to urban parks and mental health. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 17(1), 19–24.
- Yung, E. H. K., Ho, W. K. O., & Chan, E. H. W. (2017). Elderly satisfaction with planning and design of public parks in high-density old districts: A case study of Hong Kong. Cities, 60, 156–164. [CrossRef]
- UN-Habitat. (2022a). The new urban agenda. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/07/nua_handbook_14july2022.pdf.
- UN-Habitat. (2022b). Yemen urban profile: Urban trends and challenges. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/03/yemen_urban_profile_2022.pdf.
- World Bank. (2023). Yemen Urban Recovery Framework: Building Resilience in Conflict-Affected Cities. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099414002272310071/p1808430e73c160b7091a708a1b2e5a3d5a.
- Better Auckland. (2015). Pedestrian comfort assessment: Evaluating walkability in Auckland’s CBD. https://www.betterauckland.org.nz/pedestrian-comfort-assessment-2015.

| Dimension | Significant results |
|---|---|
| Demographic profile | Stratified by age and income, the survey included 300 urban dwellers, 52% of whom were female, with an average age of 42.5 years. |
| Spatial inequalities | Walkability = 1.2 km/km² (compared to the norm of 5 km/km²); green space = 3.2% (compared to the 15% regional average); these values indicate a serious urban spatial deficit. |
| Psychosocial stress | Youth and low-income groups experienced the highest levels of stress (avg. 4.1/5), and stress was inversely correlated with the proximity of green spaces (r = –0.32, p < 0.05). |
| Cultural loss (qualitative) | 55% mentioned cultural deterioration, 68% reported privatization of leisure, and 55% said that the loss of majlis erodes intergenerational communication and social cohesiveness. |
| Mixed-methods synthesis methodological strengths/limitations | Ethnography, surveys, and integrated GIS show that cultural displacement and environmental inequality both negatively impact post-conflict well-being. |
| City | Urban stressors | Deficits in Space | Adaptive responses | Important obstacles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sana'a | Overcrowding and the decline of social norms (such as qat gatherings). | Deteriorating infrastructure; limited preservation of heritage spaces. | Adaptive reuse of historic structures. | Chronic funding gaps and political instability. |
| Aden | Ethnic tensions and post-colonial fragmentation. | Unofficial settlements, less than 3% green space, and coastlines that have been privatized. | Hubs of hybrid culture and commerce. | Conflicts between ethnic groups and inadequate public investment. |
| Taiz | Social disintegration and fractures brought on by war. | 60% of public spaces are inaccessible; reliance on informal mingling zones | Spatial design that takes trauma into account (e.g., rehabilitated schools). | Absence of institutional support. |
| Al-Mukalla | Fishing communities are marginalized and privatized. | 85% of people live more than a kilometer away from greenery; the coastline is neglected. | Unused lots can become pocket parks. | Issues with scalability and the dangers of community exclusion. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).