Submitted:
27 August 2025
Posted:
28 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Supply Chain Ecosystem for City Manufacturing
2.2. Knowledge Management Based on OI and EC Through a Platform Service Supply Chain
3. A Conceptual Model of Spatial Configuration of the SCE within CMFMC for KM Based on OI and EC
- 1. Customers: CMFMC residents (individuals and legal entities) who use its products, services and the PSSC, participate in their improvement, and benefit from smart mobility, clean energy, sustainable products, circular economy practices, etc., and non-resident of CMFMC within in the large city (municipal entities who apply cluster-tested innovations to urban infrastructure and services related to public transport, renewable energy sources, municipal and industrial waste, hospitals, and public engagement [2,46], Advanced Technology and Educational Parks (ATEPs) who use the SCE for applied research and development (R&D), training, prototyping and engage with cases study to test and refine innovations and Industrial and Technology Parks who apply cluster-tested innovations to improve its efficiency [4,47].
- 2. Cluster manufacturing enterprises (CMEs) who adopt innovations for smart sustainable product and service development, serve as testbeds or scale partners for city manufacturing technology using PSSC [7].
4. Methodology
4.1. Methodological Approach
4.2. Data Collection Procedures
4.3. Data Analysis
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
7.1. Theoretical Implications
7.2. Practical Implications
7.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CLN | city logistics node |
| CM | city manufacturing |
| CMFMC | city multifloor manufacturing cluster |
| CA&NFPE | cluster associations & not-for-profit entity |
| CC | cluster competitor |
| CME | cluster manufacturing enterprise |
| CPS | cluster procurement service |
| CSE | cluster startup enterprise |
| ES | external supplier |
| FTS | freight transport service |
| GPS | global positioning system |
| ICT | information and communications technologies |
| I4.0 | industry 4.0 |
| IoT | internet of things |
| KM | knowledge management |
| FI&I | financial institutions & investor |
| MI&UP | municipal infrastructure & utility provider |
| NFPE | not-for-profit entity |
| OI | open innovation |
| OIT | open innovation tourism |
| PSSC | platform service supply chain |
| R&GB | regulators & government body |
| R&D | research and development |
| SRS | sales and return service |
| SCE | supply chain ecosystem |
| SME | small and medium-sized enterprise |
| SSE | spawned startup enterprise |
| T&SP | technology & startups providers |
| UCPI | university Centre for Projects and Innovation |
| US-O | university spin-of |
References
- Lom, M.; Pribyl, O.; Svitek, M. Industry 4.0 as a Part of Smart Cities. Proceedings of the SCSP 2016. Smart City Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.
- Dzhuguryan, T.; Deja, A. Sustainable waste management for a city multifloor manufacturing cluster: A framework for designing a smart supply chain. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1540. [CrossRef]
- Viswanadham, N.; Samvedi, A. Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance and risk criteria. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51:21, 6484-6498. [CrossRef]
- Deja, A.; Dzhuguryan, T.; Dzhuguryan, L.; Konradi, O.; Ulewicz, R. Smart sustainable city manufacturing and logistics: A framework for city logistics node 4.0 operations. Energies 2021, 14, 8380. [CrossRef]
- Dudek, T.; Dzhuguryan, T.; Wiśnicki, B.; Pędziwiatr, K. Smart Sustainable Production and Distribution Network Model for City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Clusters. Energies 2022, 15(2):488. [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis D.; Doukas M. Design and planning of manufacturing networks for mass customisation an personalisation: Challenges and Outlook, Robust Manufacturing Conference (RoMaC 2014), Procedia CIRP 2014, 19, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Deja, A.; Ślączka, W.; Dzhuguryan, L.; Dzhuguryan, T.; Ulewicz, R. Green technologies in smart city multifloor manufacturing clusters: A framework for additive manufacturing management. Prod. Eng. Arch. 2023, 29(4), 428-443. [CrossRef]
- Amjad, M.S.; Diaz-Elsayed, N. Smart and sustainable urban manufacturing for a circular economy. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024, 26, 31789–31815. [CrossRef]
- Davydenko, L.; Davydenko, N.; Bosak, A.; Bosak, A.; Deja, A.; Dzhuguryan, T. Smart Sustainable Freight Transport for a City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Cluster: A Framework of the Energy Efficiency Monitoring of Electric Vehicle Fleet Charging. Energies 2022, 15, 3780. [CrossRef]
- Gevorkyan, E.; Chmiel, J.; Wiśnicki, B.; Dzhuguryan, T.; Rucki, M.; Nerubatskyi, V. Smart Sustainable Production Management for City Multifloor Manufacturing Clusters: An Energy-Efficient Approach to the Choice of Ceramic Filter Sintering Technology. Energies 2022, 15(17), 6443. [CrossRef]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 1-21. [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.; Zhou, H.; Sarkis, J. Evaluating Industry 4.0 technology and sustainable development goals – a social perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Deja, A.; Ślączka, W.; Kaup, M.; Szołtysek, J.; Dzhuguryan, L.; Dzhuguryan, T. Supply Chain Management in Smart City Manufacturing Clusters: An Alternative Approach to Urban Freight Mobility with Electric Vehicles. Energies 2024, 17(21), 5284. [CrossRef]
- Wiśnicki, B.; Dzhuguryan, T.; Mielniczuk, S.; Petrov, I.; Davydenko, L. A Decision Support Model for Lean Supply Chain Management in City Multifloor Manufacturing Clusters. Sustainability 2024, 16(20), 8801. [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.-J.; Choi, T.-M.; Zhang, J. Platform supported supply chain operations in the blockchain era: supply contracting and moral hazards. Decision Sciences 2021, 52 (4), 866–892. [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B. Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 160, 102676. [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Aroean, L.; Ko, W.W. A business ecosystem perspective of supply chain justice practices: A study of a marina resort supply chain ecosystem in Indonesia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2019, 39(9/10), 1122-1143. [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S.M. Startups in the supply chain ecosystem: an organizing framework and research opportunities. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2021, 51(10), 1130-1157. [CrossRef]
- Ingaldi, M.; Ulewicz, R. Problems with the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Enterprises from the SME Sector. Sustainability 2020, 12, 217. [CrossRef]
- Scuotto, V.; Alfiero, S.; Cuomo, M.T.; Monge, F. Knowledge management and technological innovation in family SMEs context. J. Knowl. Manag. 2024, 28(3), 789-798. [CrossRef]
- Iansiti, M.; Levien, R. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004. [CrossRef]
- Thomas, L.D.W.; Ritala, P. Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: a collective action view. J. Manag. 2021, 48(3), 515-541. [CrossRef]
- Franco, M.; Pinho, C. A case study about cooperation between University Research Centres: Knowledge transfer perspective. J. Innov. Knowl. 2019, 4(1), 62-69. [CrossRef]
- Kulkarni, P.; Tigadi, B.; Gokhale, P.; K., L. University incubators performance through the lens of institutional theory. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management 2024. [CrossRef]
- Magliocca, P.; Herold, D.; Canestrino, R.; Temperini, V.; Albino, V. The role of start-ups as knowledge brokers: a supply chain ecosystem perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 2023, 27(10), 2625-2641. [CrossRef]
- Ketchen, D.J.; Crook, T.R.; Craighead, C.W. From supply chains to supply ecosystems: implications for strategic sourcing research and practice. J. Bus. Logist. 2014, 35 (3), 165-171. [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Hu, Q. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation 2020, 94-95, 102010. [CrossRef]
- Viswanadham, N. Ecosystem model for healthcare platform. Sādhanā 2021, 46, 188. [CrossRef]
- Shipilov, A.; Gawer, A. Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2020, 14(1), 92-121. [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Chen, A.; Yin, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Luo, J. A framework for sustainable management of the platform service supply chain: An empirical study of the logistics sector in China. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 235, 108112. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N., Governance and design of digital platforms: a review and future research directions on a meta-organization. J. Manag. 2022, 48(1), 147-184. [CrossRef]
- Sá, T.; Ferreira, J.J.M.; Jayantilal, S. Open innovation strategy: a systematic literature review. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2025, 28(2). 454-510. [CrossRef]
- Ogink, R.H.A.J.; Goossen, M.C.; Romme, A.G.L; Akkermans, H. Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Technovation 2023, 119, 102621. [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, H.W. Open Innovation Results; Going Beyond the Hype and Getting Down to Business. Oxford University Press, London, 2020.
- Han, J. Open innovation in a smart city context: the case of Sejong smart city initiative. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Wu, I.-L.; Hu, Y.-P. Open innovation based knowledge management implementation: a mediating role of knowledge management design. J. Knowl. Manag. 2018, 22(8), 1736-1756. [CrossRef]
- Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, R.; Deja, A. A concept for an IT platform to assess the impact of transport infrastructure investments on ecological safety and security. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 207, 4258-4267. [CrossRef]
- Shen, B.; Xu, X.; Chan, H.L.; Choi, T.-M. Collaborative innovation in supply chain systems: value creation and leadership structure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 235, 108068. [CrossRef]
- Iwan, S.; Jedliński, M.; Sosik-Filipiak, K.; Osypchuk, O.; Nürnberg, M. Analysis of contemporary scientific achievements in the field of Urban Freight Transport in terms of the use of knowledge-based management. Transp. Res. Proc. 2023, 23, 4388-4395. [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Chen, B.; Veglianti, E. Platform Service Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Data Empowerment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5419. [CrossRef]
- Bereznoy, A.; Meissner, D.; Scuotto, V. The intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the digital platform based ecosystem. A conceptual study on the lens of the open innovation approach. J. Knowl. Manag. 2021, 25(8). 2022-2042. [CrossRef]
- Iwan, S.; Wagner, N.; Kijewska, K.; Jensen, SA. Concept of the knowledge-based city logistics: Problems and solutions. PLoS ONE 2024, 19(6): e0305563. [CrossRef]
- Zhen, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Yi, W. Crowdsourcing mode evaluation for parcel delivery service platforms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 235, 108067. [CrossRef]
- Fink, A.; Klöckner, M.; Räder,T.; Wagner, S.M. Supply chain management accelerators: Types, objectives, and key design features. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 164, 102728. [CrossRef]
- Carst, A.E.; Hu, Y.; Complementors as ecosystem actors: a systematic review. Manag. Rev. Q. 2024, 74, 2579–2635. [CrossRef]
- Kim, S. H.; Kim, E.; Kim, B.H.S. The Effect of Municipal Consolidation on Urban Manufacturing Productivity. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2008, 12(2), 104–115. [CrossRef]
- Szopik-Depczyńska, K.; Dembińska, I.; Barczak, A.; Szczepaniak, K.; Secka, J.; Ioppolo, G. Does marketing orientation impact the innovation activity of R&D departments influenced by user-driven innovation? The correspondence analysis. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2024, 27(5). 1793-1811. [CrossRef]
- Oppedisano, R. Collaborative Spaces and FabLabs. A Global Organisational and Collaborative Network. Springer Briefs in Business, Springer Cham 2024, 1-52.
- Iwan, S.; Kijewska, K.; Lemke, J. Analysis of Parcel Lockers’ Efficiency as the Last Mile Delivery Solution – The Results of the Research in Poland . Transp. Res. Proc. 2016, 12, 644-655.
- Dudek, T.; Kaśkosz, K. Optimizing drone logistics in complex urban industrial infrastructure. Transp. Res., Part D Transp. Environ. 2025, 140, 104610. [CrossRef]
- Soetanto, D.; Jack, S. The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation 2016, 50–51, 25-40. [CrossRef]
- Ardito, L.; Ferraris, A.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Bresciani, S.; Del Giudice, M. The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019, 142, 312-321. [CrossRef]
- Davydenko, L.; Davydenko, N.; Deja, A.; Wiśnicki, B.; Dzhuguryan, T. Efficient Energy Management for the Smart Sustainable City Multifloor Manufacturing Clusters: A Formalization of the Water Supply System Operation Conditions Based on Monitoring Water Consumption Profiles. Energies 2023, 16(11), 4519. [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Application: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publication 2018.
- Stornelli, A.; Simms, C.; Reim, W.; Ozcan, S. Exploring the dynamic capabilities of technology provider ecosystems: A study of smart manufacturing projects. Technovation 2024, 130, 102925. [CrossRef]
- Gioia, D.A.; Corley, K.G.; Hamilton, A.L. Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 2013, 16 (1), 15–31. [CrossRef]
- Silva, L.E.N.; De Vasconcelos Gomes, L.A.; De Faria, A.M.; Borini, F.M. Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions, Technovation 2024, 132, 102984. [CrossRef]
- Alfiero, S.; Battisti, E.; Nirino, N.; Papa, A. Exploring sustainability in start-ups: the impact of knowledge management on achieving sustainable goals. J. Knowl. Manag. 2025, 29(4), 1191-1208. [CrossRef]
- Jacobides, M.G.; Cennamo, C.; Gawer, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strateg. Manag. J. 2018, 39. 2255–2276. [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, S.; Mehrotra, A.; Alsabban, A.; Quintino, M. and Papa, G. Knowledge management in family businesses: a systematic assessment and future research agenda. J. Knowl. Manag. 2025. [CrossRef]
- Metwaly, A.; ElKattan, A.; Kaoud, M. Toward an Egyptian managerial framework based on crowdsourcing for open innovation. Am. J. Bus. 2022, 37(1). 14-33. [CrossRef]
- Samuelsson, M.; Jutterström, M.; An empirical test of sponsorship theory on a population of business incubators between 2005 and 2017 – is it working or not? Innovation 2023, 26(4), 585–611. [CrossRef]
- Zhi, R.; Lockett, M.; Zhou, A.J. From hiding to sharing: a knowledge hiding perspective on knowledge management in MNEs. J. Knowl. Manag. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Rani, N.; Yaqub, M.Z.; Singh, N.; Magliocca, P. Exploring the significance of knowledge transfer for facilitating cross-border acquisitions: an extensive examination of current themes, gaps, and potential future research directions. J. Knowl. Manag. 2025, 29(3), 837-869. [CrossRef]
- Jugend, D.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Scaliza, J.A.A.; Rocha, R.S.; Junior, J.A.G.; Latan, H.; Salgado, M.H. Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation. Technovation 2018, 74–75, 54-65. [CrossRef]
- Menten, S.; Smits, A.; Kok, R.A.W.; Lauche, K.; Van Gils, M. External resourcing for digital innovation in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation 2025, 140, 103142. [CrossRef]
- Oliva, F.L.; Kotabe, M. Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups. J. Knowl. Manag. 2019, 23(9), 1838-1856. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, A.J.; Fey, C.; Yildiz, H.E. Fostering integration through HRM practices: An empirical examination of absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As. J. World Bus. 2020, 55(2), 100947. [CrossRef]
- Yildiz, H.E.; Murtic, A.; Zander, U.; Richtnér, A. What Fosters Individual-Level Absorptive Capacity in MNCs? An Extended Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Framework. Manag. Int. Rev. 2019, 59, 93–129. [CrossRef]





| Qualification | Experience in years | Frequency (N = 108) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Researcher | < 5 | 4 | 3.7% |
| ≥ 5 | 28 | 25.9% | |
| Engineer | < 5 | 9 | 8.3% |
| ≥ 5 | 26 | 24.1% | |
| Manager | < 5 | 8 | 7.4% |
| ≥ 5 | 22 | 20.4% | |
| Investor | < 5 | 2 | 1.9% |
| ≥ 5 | 4 | 3.7% | |
| Government official | < 5 | 3 | 2.7% |
| ≥ 5 | 2 | 1.9% |
| Maritime University in Szczecin |
| West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin |
| Digital Draft |
| Bitemedia |
| IFox |
| Bardins Sp. z o.o. |
| SIMLOCK Szczecin |
| 3D Szczecin |
| 3DProdruk |
| 3D Printing – Digital Craftsmanship |
| Plastipol Poland Sp. z o.o. |
| FabLab Szczecin |
| Combinat Coworking |
| Technopark Pomerania |
| Red Sky |
| 3DStart |
| Mabo |
| DPD Polska Sp. z o.o. Szczecin Branch |
| Kurier BPS |
| Tania Paczka |
| ENEA Operator Sp. z o.o. Distribution branch in Szczecin |
| Ecoinnovazione |
| Invest in West Pomerania |
| Getsix Szczecin Sp. z o.o. |
| Galaxy – Shopping and Entertainment Center |
| Szczecin City Spatial Planning Office |
| Głos Szczeciński |
| Radio Szczecin |
| No of topics | Keys Actors of the SCE of a CMFMC for KM based on OI and EC by the UCPI* | Ave-rage | SD** | Me-dian | Mode | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUST | CMEs | CLN | FTS | CSEs | CPS | SRS | CA-Es | FF | UCPIs | SSEs | US-Os | T&SP | CCs | R&GBs | I&UP | ESs | FI&I | M&PO | |||||
| 1 | 3.91 | 4.47 | 3.88 | 3.91 | 4.34 | 3.13 | 4.03 | 4.41 | 4.50 | 4.47 | 4.53 | 4.06 | 3.09 | 3.91 | 4.0 | 3.13 | 2.63 | 4.13 | 2.84 | 3.86 | 1.13 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | 3.69 | 4.44 | 3.91 | 3.69 | 4.59 | 3.28 | 4.09 | 4.03 | 4.47 | 4.50 | 4.25 | 4.56 | 4.19 | 3.72 | 3.38 | 3.06 | 4.06 | 3.44 | 3.47 | 3.94 | 1.06 | 4 | 5 |
| 3 | 3.88 | 4.19 | 4.0 | 3.59 | 4.22 | 3.63 | 4.06 | 4.0 | 4.06 | 4.34 | 4.13 | 4.0 | 4.25 | 3.97 | 3.97 | 3.19 | 3.69 | 4.06 | 3.5 | 3.93 | 1.03 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 3.91 | 4.13 | 3.63 | 3.47 | 4.50 | 3.69 | 4.06 | 3.84 | 4.44 | 4.50 | 3.81 | 3.84 | 4.0 | 3.84 | 3.34 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 4.13 | 3.47 | 3.86 | 0.92 | 4 | 4 |
| 5 | 4.22 | 4.31 | 4.22 | 4.03 | 4.38 | 3.78 | 4.16 | 4.19 | 4.34 | 4.32 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 4.19 | 4.22 | 4.13 | 3.81 | 3.22 | 3.84 | 3.44 | 4.0 | 0.95 | 4 | 4 |
| 6 | 3.59 | 4.09 | 3.94 | 3.66 | 4.25 | 3.53 | 3.69 | 3.91 | 4.06 | 4.34 | 3.69 | 4.06 | 3.41 | 4.19 | 4.09 | 3.56 | 2.97 | 3.72 | 3.88 | 3.82 | 0.91 | 4 | 4 |
| 7 | 3.34 | 4.09 | 3.75 | 3.69 | 4.31 | 3.63 | 3.94 | 3.97 | 4.38 | 4.19 | 4.41 | 4.22 | 4.13 | 3.97 | 4.19 | 3.38 | 3.06 | 3.69 | 3.84 | 3.90 | 0.95 | 4 | 4 |
| 8 | 2.97 | 3.63 | 3.38 | 3.28 | 4.03 | 2.97 | 3.44 | 3.69 | 4.34 | 4.19 | 4.17 | 4.13 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 3.56 | 3.34 | 3.47 | 3.59 | 3.72 | 3.65 | 0.97 | 4 | 4 |
| 9 | 3.43 | 4.03 | 3.41 | 3.44 | 4.31 | 3.72 | 3.38 | 4.03 | 3.97 | 4.03 | 4.16 | 4.13 | 3.78 | 4.06 | 3.97 | 3.75 | 3.72 | 3.59 | 3.63 | 3.81 | 0.93 | 4 | 4 |
| 10 | 4.06 | 4.13 | 3.47 | 3.50 | 4.13 | 4.09 | 3.75 | 3.28 | 3.53 | 3.72 | 3.81 | 3.78 | 3.66 | 3.34 | 4.19 | 3.44 | 2.94 | 3.84 | 3.31 | 3.68 | 0.97 | 4 | 4 |
| 11 | 2.66 | 3.75 | 2.81 | 3.09 | 3.38 | 3.22 | 3.72 | 2.31 | 3.34 | 3.13 | 3.88 | 3.78 | 3.21 | 3.53 | 3.41 | 2.65 | 2.06 | 3.44 | 2.47 | 3.15 | 1.04 | 3 | 3 |
| 12 | 3.22 | 3.81 | 3.47 | 3.57 | 4.12 | 2.69 | 3.35 | 3.51 | 3.78 | 3.87 | 3.34 | 3.25 | 2.78 | 3.94 | 3.98 | 3.03 | 2.97 | 3.22 | 3.40 | 3.44 | 1.02 | 3 | 3 |
| 13 | 3.63 | 3.65 | 3.56 | 3.31 | 3.94 | 3.43 | 3.06 | 3.78 | 4.03 | 4.06 | 3.88 | 3.44 | 3.59 | 4.03 | 3.94 | 3.34 | 3.28 | 3.06 | 4.19 | 3.64 | 1.03 | 4 | 4 |
| 14 | 3.59 | 3.91 | 3.66 | 3.06 | 4.28 | 4.09 | 4.47 | 3.88 | 3.91 | 4.03 | 3.56 | 3.34 | 3.25 | 3.84 | 3.13 | 3.56 | 3.44 | 3.47 | 4.09 | 3.66 | 1.10 | 4 | 4 |
| 15 | 3.97 | 4.25 | 3.91 | 3.94 | 4.0 | 3.97 | 3.56 | 4.19 | 4.34 | 4.44 | 4.38 | 3.34 | 3.66 | 3.5 | 3.03 | 2.91 | 4.13 | 3.81 | 4.13 | 3.87 | 1.04 | 4 | 4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).