The dataset provides a precise record of water quality as measured at various points along the water sampling sites in the Kano region of Nigeria, with all the data points centered at latitudes between 8° 02ʹ and 8° 59ʹ and longitudes between 11° 00ʹ and 12° 14ʹ. Parameters that are monitored are electrical conductivity, hardness, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen (DO2). All these parameters indicate physical, chemical, and biological factors of water quality. Spatial agglomeration of sample points allows to conduct a comparative analysis of differences in the quality of water based on the geology of the area, urbanization, and sources of pollution.
Electrical conductivity of the water, which measures the water's capacity to conduct current as a result of the ionic content, also records a wide range, with a low of around 176.2 µS/cm up to very high records above 2400 µS/cm at certain Hotoro and Ring Road, among others. Such high conductivity values will be associated with high TDS and hardness values, indicating mineral-rich or possibly polluted water that may most likely be caused by natural mineralization of groundwater or manmade activities. The majority of pH cases are within a general range of slightly acidic to slightly alkaline (~5.6 and ~8.7, respectively) and therefore acceptable as drinking water, although some cases are borderline and may be considered acidic and contribute to corrosiveness and leaching of metals in pipes. Moderate changes are recorded in the turbidity values, varying between 8 and 19 NTU, the meaning of which is that the suspended solids are changing, thus affecting the water clarity and harboring pathogens, resulting in difficulties in providing water treatment and supporting aquatic organisms.
Where the violin plots indicate scattered patterns of suspended solids across spatial locations, the plots of turbidity demonstrate greater dispersion of turbidity in KOFAR FADA, which could imply natural sediment accretion or urban wastes. The pairplot also shows the correlation, like a positive relationship of conductivity to TDS, which confirms that in these water sources, an increased presence of dissolved solids is also accompanied by increased ion content. The various visualization tools, boxplots, scatter plots, violins, and pairwise relationships allow them to come up with a unified picture of how the various parameters of water quality interact spatially and physico-chemically in different locations, thus helping them to be able to monitor and manage the environment in a more targeted fashion. In general, the nature of the plotted data indicates a hydrochemical landscape of great complexity with localised hotspots of several parameters of mineralization, acidity, and biological oxygen demand, indicative of a spatial heterogeneity in land use, pollution sources, and geology. This comprehensive science visualization highlights the importance of multi-parameter evaluation, which is necessary to accurately represent water quality statuses and provide informed planning decisions for sustainable management of water resources in these Nigerian regions. It is consistent with standard approaches to analysis of water quality data, in which a combination of physical, chemical, and biological indicators produces strong information on the health of an ecosystem and the effect humans have on it.
Confidence interval plots
The Confidence interval plot of water quality parameters of HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, KOFAR FADA, and GEZAWA shows the estimate of the mean with the range of uncertainty at a typical 95 percent confidence level. Narrower intervals mean that the measurements are consistent and reliable in an area, whereas wider intervals mean there is much variability or a smaller amount of data. Disagreement of the mean value and the non-overlapping confidence interval between areas indicates the existence of a statistically significant difference between the areas regarding water quality (e.g., conductivity or TDS), and this may be attributed to spatial heterogeneity attributable to either geology or anthropogenic activity. All in all, these plots give effective, scientifically powerful visual summaries to compare the water quality status with amplified confidence across regions and make sharply focused management decisions.
Figure 6.
(a) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Conductivity, (b) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Hardness, (c) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Hardness pH, (d) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of TDS, (e) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Temperature, (f) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Turbidity and (g) Mean & Confidence interval of DO2.
Figure 6.
(a) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Conductivity, (b) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Hardness, (c) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Hardness pH, (d) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of TDS, (e) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Temperature, (f) Mean & 95% Confidence interval of Turbidity and (g) Mean & Confidence interval of DO2.
Table 2.
Showing Locations with Cation Concentration in the Study Area.
Table 2.
Showing Locations with Cation Concentration in the Study Area.
| S/No |
Name |
Na+
|
K+
|
Mg2+
|
Ca2+
|
Cr |
AS |
Fe |
Zn |
Cu |
Ni |
Pb |
Cd |
| |
|
|
|
|
(Meq) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Sabon bakin zuwo Hotoro GRA |
23.4 |
0.1 |
23.2 |
16.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
| No. 6 Hotoro Avenue |
21.6 |
0.2 |
9.2 |
8.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
| Hotoro |
20.4 |
0.0 |
34.2 |
9.6 |
0.04 |
0.0 |
0.01 |
2.51 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.004 |
0.0 |
| No. 1 Sabo Bakin Zuwo Road. |
26.6 |
0.0 |
54.2 |
10.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.02 |
1.63 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.003 |
0.0 |
| No. 13 Sabo Bakin Zuwo Road |
45.9 |
0.0 |
13.2 |
9.3 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.03 |
3.31 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.003 |
0.0 |
| Tarauni |
54.9 |
0.0 |
15.6 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.60 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.10 |
0.0 |
| Eastern Bypass Hotoro Kano |
61.3 |
0.1 |
11.5 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.04 |
2.61 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.002 |
0.0 |
| No. 70 Ring Road Bypass |
34.1 |
0.2 |
10.3 |
16.6 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.04 |
1.56 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.002 |
0.0 |
| No. 34 Ring Road Bypass |
23.6 |
0.3 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
1.23 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.0 |
| Hotoro Kano |
21.6 |
0.2 |
15.6 |
12.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.65 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
2 |
Kano Municipal 1 |
12.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 2 |
31.0 |
0.0 |
5.2 |
9.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 3 |
15.4 |
0.0 |
6.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 4 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
5.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 5 |
10.4 |
0.0 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 6 |
54.1 |
0.0 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.002 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 7 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.001 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 8 |
10.6 |
0.0 |
16.3 |
12.6 |
0.001 |
0.0 |
0.06 |
3.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 9 |
45.1 |
0.0 |
56.2 |
34.2 |
0.004 |
0.0 |
0.04 |
1.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
| Kano Municipal 10 |
43.3 |
0.0 |
36.3 |
23.4 |
0.001 |
0.0 |
0.04 |
1.30 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.005 |
0.00 |
3 |
Kumbotso 1 |
12.0 |
0.02 |
6.4 |
9.1 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 2 |
5.1 |
0.00 |
10.3 |
15.0 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.005 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 3 |
10.3 |
0.03 |
6.6 |
13.3 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.4 |
0.00 |
0.004 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 4 |
16.4 |
0.54 |
12.6 |
6.5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.3 |
0.00 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 5 |
12.5 |
0.65 |
10.0 |
9.3 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.6 |
0.00 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 6 |
14.0 |
0.02 |
11.0 |
6.9 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 7 |
14.3 |
0.00 |
6.6 |
5.8 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0. |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 8 |
10.3 |
9.50 |
9.5 |
4.9 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 9 |
6.5 |
0.01 |
6.3 |
9.4 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kumbotso 10 |
6.1 |
0.00 |
8.2 |
5.3 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4 |
Aliko Oil Fueling Station |
0.00 |
1.83 |
6 |
5.61 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.1 |
0.04 |
0.7 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| HJRBDA Office |
0.00 |
0.96 |
4 |
3.21 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.6 |
0.02 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
| Kadawa Pri. Health Care |
0.00 |
1.88 |
7 |
6.11 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Tangala |
0.00 |
2.67 |
31 |
24.63 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
0.4 |
0.02 |
0.0 |
0.02 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Kofar Fada Jummat Mosque |
0.00 |
2.90 |
28 |
31.06 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
0.8 |
0.01 |
0.4 |
0.03 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
| Makara Huta Borehole |
0.00 |
2.05 |
30 |
21.08 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.3 |
0.04 |
0.2 |
0.06 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Rijiyar Isha’u |
0.00 |
0.64 |
9 |
5.86 |
0.004 |
0.00 |
0.2 |
0.26 |
0.1 |
0.01 |
0.004 |
0.00 |
| Rijiyar Gidan Ganji |
0.00 |
0.66 |
8 |
5.62 |
0.005 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.2 |
0.00 |
0.005 |
0.00 |
| Maza Waje Borehole |
1.40 |
0.91 |
6 |
5.69 |
0.081 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.32 |
0.3 |
0.00 |
0.081 |
0.00 |
| Ali Yage Borehole |
0.00 |
0.89 |
4 |
4.99 |
0.036 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.02 |
0.1 |
0.00 |
0.036 |
0.00 |
| Rijiyar Gidan Mallam Kabiru |
0.00 |
1.01 |
7 |
6.82 |
0.018 |
0.00 |
0.3 |
0.04 |
0.2 |
0.00 |
0.018 |
0.00 |
5 |
Babawa 1 |
12.0 |
0.00 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Babawa 2 |
31.0 |
0.00 |
5.2 |
9.1 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kawaji |
15.4 |
0.00 |
6.2 |
5.5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Babawa 3 |
12.5 |
0.00 |
5.2 |
4.2 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.14 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Kano, Gumel Road |
10.4 |
0.00 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Babawa 4 |
54.1 |
0.00 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.002 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Gezawa 1 |
12.5 |
0.00 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
| Gezawa 2 |
10.6 |
0.00 |
16.3 |
12.6 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.006 |
3.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.003 |
0.00 |
| Babawa 7 |
45.1 |
0.00 |
56.2 |
34.2 |
0.004 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
1.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.002 |
0.00 |
| Kawaji 2 |
34.3 |
0.00 |
36.3 |
23.4 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
1.30 |
0.001 |
0.00 |
0.005 |
0.00 |
Table 3.
Showing Locations with Anion Concentration in the study Area.
Table 3.
Showing Locations with Anion Concentration in the study Area.
| S/No |
Name |
Cl-
|
SO4-
|
NO3-
|
HCO3-
|
PO2 4-
|
NH3-
|
| |
(Meq) |
1 |
Sabon bakin zuwo Hotoro GRA |
0.34 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
13 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| No. 6 Hotoro Avenue |
1.45 |
0.5 |
0.13 |
12 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Hotoro |
1.21 |
54 |
6.9 |
16 |
0.0 |
0.01 |
| No. 1 Sabo Bakin Zuwo Road. |
1.00 |
63 |
9.6 |
10 |
0.6 |
0.01 |
| No. 13 Sabo Bakin Zuwo Road |
0.46 |
69 |
12.0 |
116 |
3.5 |
0.0 |
| Tarauni |
0.13 |
13 |
0.1 |
23 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
| Eastern Bypass Hotoro Kano |
0.54 |
49 |
16 |
241 |
1.6 |
0.01 |
| No. 70 Ring Road Bypass |
0.21 |
68 |
12.9 |
432 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
| No. 34 Ring Road Bypass |
0.04 |
23 |
0.2 |
13 |
0.34 |
0.03 |
| Hotoro Kano |
0.01 |
16 |
0.1 |
14 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
2 |
Kano Municipal 1 |
0.0 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
130 |
0 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 2 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.6 |
112.3 |
0 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 3 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.3 |
134 |
0.02 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 4 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.5 |
95.4 |
0 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 5 |
1.45 |
0 |
0.5 |
122 |
0 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 6 |
2.41 |
0 |
0.6 |
65.3 |
0 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 7 |
1.45 |
0 |
0.2 |
56.6 |
0.03 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 8 |
0.34 |
123.1 |
34.52 |
256.3 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
| Kano Municipal 9 |
1.68 |
140.6 |
56.3 |
316.2 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
| Kano Municipal 10 |
1.46 |
134.3 |
13.6 |
255.6 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
3 |
Kumbotso 1 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.51 |
11 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 2 |
0.05 |
0.63 |
0.13 |
16 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 3 |
0.01 |
0.53 |
0.15 |
17 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 4 |
0.02 |
0.13 |
0.46 |
19 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 5 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.23 |
13 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 6 |
0.13 |
0.06 |
0.25 |
16 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 7 |
0.06 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
18 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 8 |
0.26 |
0.45 |
0.16 |
19 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 9 |
0.03 |
2.33 |
0.26 |
14 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kumbotso 10 |
0.05 |
6.45 |
0.54 |
18 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4 |
Aliko Oil Fueling Station |
0.7 |
16.5 |
0.9 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
| HJRBDA Office |
0.2 |
13.1 |
1.3 |
0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
| Kadawa Pri. Health Care |
0.0 |
10.4 |
4.1 |
8 |
0.1 |
4.1 |
| Tangala |
0.1 |
16.5 |
1.9 |
48 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
| Kofar Fada Jummat Mosque |
1.4 |
10.4 |
1.4 |
57 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
| Makara Huta Borehole |
1.0 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
32 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
| Rijiyar Isha’u |
0.6 |
16.8 |
2.0 |
14 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
| Rijiyar Gidan Ganji |
0.1 |
36.0 |
2.9 |
0 |
0.1 |
2.0 |
| Maza Waje Borehole |
1.9 |
25.5 |
6.8 |
0 |
0.0 |
2.9 |
| Ali Yage Borehole |
0.3 |
14.1 |
3.8 |
0 |
0.1 |
6.8 |
| Rijiyar Gidan Mallam Kabiru |
0.0 |
0.02 |
4.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5 |
Babawa 1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.04 |
130.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Babawa 2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
112.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kawaji |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
134.0 |
0.02 |
0.0 |
| Babawa 3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
95.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Kano, Gumel Road |
1.45 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
122.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Babawa 4 |
2.41 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
65.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Gezawa 1 |
1.45 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
56.6 |
0.03 |
0.0 |
| Gezawa 2 |
0.34 |
123.1 |
34.52 |
256.3 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
| Babawa 7 |
1.68 |
140.6 |
56.3 |
316.2 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
| Kawaji 2 |
1.46 |
134.3 |
13.60 |
255.6 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
The table contains the details of the major cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+), trace/toxic elements (Chromium, Arsenic, Iron, Zinc, Copper, Nickel, Lead, Cadmium), and their concentrations in different groundwater sites. The major ion chemistry is largely dominated by sodium, magnesium, and calcium, whose levels greatly vary between sites; sodium is relatively high at Tarauni and Eastern Bypass Hotoro Kano, whereas magnesium and calcium are high at some Hotoro and Kumbotso locations. There is a generally low value of Potassium that is characteristic of natural waters because of its reactivity in soils. The trace metal and heavy metal analysis shows that most samples have an undetectable or extremely low concentration of chromium, arsenic, copper, nickel, lead, and cadmium, and this poses little risk of acute response to the elements, given the current circumstances. The presence of iron is sometimes observed in low concentrations, and that is not uncommon in groundwater and can be connected with the mineralogy of the aquifer. Zinc intermittently trends upwards, particularly in Hotoro and some of the Kano municipal samples, and this could be indicative of localized anthropogenic enrichment or natural fluctuation, but there appear to be very minimal levels of metals that could be considered harmful. The spatial heterogeneity indicates environmental importance when there are spiked sodium, magnesium, calcium, or zinc levels at certain sites (e.g., No.13 Sabo Bakin Zuwo Road, Eastern Bypass Hotoro Kano, Babawa 7) and hence any of these attributes is attributable to the geology, land use, or potential pollution. Nevertheless, the general outline of trace metals indicates generally safe water as regards the emission of heavy metals. Persistent monitoring should also be necessary, as occasional surges in metals such as Pb, Fe, and Zn, particularly in affected areas, may indicate episodic contamination events or changing land-use demands.
Correlation plot
In Hotoro, the correlation matrix demonstrates linear relationships that suggest common sources or geochemical behaviors. Notably, ions such as Na+, Cl-, and SO42- show strong positive correlations, indicating their joint origin, likely from geochemical processes or pollution sources. The heatmap facilitates quick identification of ion groups that co-occur, aiding in understanding water chemistry dynamics and potential environmental impacts.
Kano Municipal's correlation plot emphasizes interactions among ions like Na+, Mg, and Ca, which are indicative of mineral dissolution and water-rock interactions. High positive correlations denote shared geochemical controls, while low or zero correlations suggest independent sources or processes. Negative correlations, though less prominent, could highlight contrasting behaviors or contamination influences, guiding resource management and pollution assessment.
In Kumbotso, the correlation analysis underscores the interconnectedness of ions such as Mg and Ca, which tend to vary together due to similar geochemical controls. The heatmap visualizes these relationships, assisting in deciphering water chemistry trends and contamination impacts, essential for environmental decision-making.
Garun Mallam’s data reveals strong positive correlations between alkaline earth metals (Mg, Ca) and major ions like K+, signifying common natural sources like mineral dissolution. Conversely, trace metals and some ions show weak or null correlations, pointing to different sources or limited contamination. The correlation matrix supports targeted environmental evaluations and resource management strategies.
Gezawa's correlation plot depicts high positive relationships among major cations (Ca, Mg, Na), reflecting their origin from water-rock interactions. Trace metals such as Fe, Zn, and Pb exhibit weaker correlations, suggesting diverse sources or localized contamination. The visualization aids in identifying parameters that co-vary, informing environmental monitoring and pollution control efforts.
Collectively, these correlation analyses across all localities provide a comprehensive understanding of the interactions among water quality constituents. They highlight shared sources, geochemical behaviors, and potential pollution influences, serving as crucial tools for environmental assessment, resource management, and pollution mitigation strategies in the respective communities (
Figure 7).
The spatial analysis of environmental parameters reveals significant variability across the surveyed region. Conductivity exhibits high spatial heterogeneity, with zero values at some locations and peaks mainly in central areas, indicating diverse mineral content, soil salinity, and environmental influences. Such variability necessitates advanced geostatistical methods like kriging for accurate mapping and resource assessment. Similarly, pH values range from approximately 5.6 to 8.7, with zero boundary values, reflecting heterogeneous soil and water conditions influenced by mineral weathering, organic matter decomposition, and microbial activity. This heterogeneity, with regions of acidity and alkalinity, impacts nutrient cycling, microbial processes, and environmental health, requiring localized evaluation and geostatistical modeling for effective management. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) demonstrate substantial spatial variation, with boundary zeros and maximum values up to 4917 mg/L, indicating complex geochemical and pollutant distributions that influence water quality and ecological safety. Monitoring is essential to identify sources of mineralization or contamination. Temperature remains moderately stable, ranging from 29°C to 33°C, with minor local fluctuations caused by land cover, microclimate, and shading effects. These temperature patterns influence ecological processes like evapotranspiration and species distribution, informing urban planning and climate mitigation strategies.
Turbidity levels are moderate (8-19 NTU), predominantly along edges, indicating a stable presence of suspended particles that can impair aquatic life by reducing light penetration and conveying pollutants. Elevated turbidity can harm ecosystems, necessitating ongoing monitoring and actions to control erosion and runoff. Dissolved oxygen (DO
2) varies from 2.3 to 6.9 mg/L internally, with boundary zeros, suggesting generally moderate water quality but localized hypoxia near 2.3 mg/L. These patterns highlight the influence of biological activity, organic matter decomposition, and environmental factors, serving as critical indicators for ecosystem health, pollution detection, and management efforts to preserve aquatic biodiversity and water quality. Overall, these parameters underscore the importance of geostatistical approaches for precise mapping, prediction, and sustainable environmental management (
Figure 8).
The spatial variability of sodium (Na⁺) concentrations ranges from 0 to approximately 61.3 mg/L, with many boundary points showing zero values, indicating influences from geology, mineral weathering, evaporation, and human activities. While most levels are below health concern thresholds, localized peaks suggest areas needing monitoring due to potential impacts on water quality, soil health, and ecosystem stability. Potassium (K⁺) levels are generally very low, with a maximum around 9.5 mg/L, implying possible nutrient deficiencies affecting plant growth and soil fertility, with occasional spikes likely from mineral weathering or fertilizer use. This diverse distribution emphasizes the need for site-specific soil and water management to address potential agricultural and ecological impacts. Magnesium (Mg²⁺) concentrations display significant spatial variation, from zeros at boundaries to peaks around 56.2 mg/L, driven by processes like mineral weathering and water-rock interactions, affecting water hardness, alkalinity, and ecological health. Continuous monitoring and geostatistical mapping are essential for managing magnesium’s influence on water and soil quality. Similarly, calcium (Ca²⁺) levels vary from zero at edges to over 34.2 mg/L, reflecting geochemical and anthropogenic influences. Calcium plays a crucial role in buffering acidity, stabilizing pH, supporting aquatic life, and promoting plant growth. Variations in calcium levels impact ecosystem productivity and stress, underscoring the importance of spatial surveillance and geostatistical analysis to manage soil fertility and water quality effectively (
Figure 9).
The water quality data across the surveyed area reveal significant spatial variability in key chemical parameters, each with implications for environmental health. Chloride (Cl⁻) concentrations are mostly low, generally below 2.5 mg/L, with many boundary points registering zero, suggesting minimal current contamination or salinity intrusion. However, elevated chloride levels can disrupt aquatic osmoregulation, impair reproduction, and contribute to soil salinization and infrastructure corrosion, highlighting the importance of ongoing geostatistical monitoring to prevent future buildup from sources like wastewater, road salts, or agriculture. Sulfate (SO₄²⁻) displays a heterogeneous distribution, with concentrations ranging from near zero at edges to over 140 mg/L internally. Elevated sulfate levels, resulting naturally from mineral weathering and volcanism but often intensified by human activities such as mining or industrial waste, can impact water taste, induce biogeochemical changes, and cause eutrophication and oxygen depletion, threatening aquatic ecosystems. Nitrate (NO₃⁻) levels vary widely, with most boundary points showing low or zero values, but localized hotspots reaching up to 56.3 mg/L, primarily from agricultural runoff and wastewater. High nitrates pose risks of eutrophication, harmful algal blooms, and health issues like methemoglobinemia, especially in infants. Many readings exceed regulatory limits, emphasizing the need for targeted management guided by geostatistical mapping. Bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) exhibits high spatial heterogeneity, with null values at boundaries and peaks exceeding 400 mg/L centrally, indicating active geochemical processes such as rock erosion and carbonate mineral dissolution. Elevated bicarbonate influences carbon cycling, aquatic photosynthesis, and metal mobility, affecting water chemistry and toxicity risks, necessitating precise monitoring. Ammonia (NH₃) concentrations are predominantly low, but localized hotspots reach up to 9.3 mg/L, suggesting pollution sources like agriculture or wastewater. High ammonia levels can damage aquatic life, especially under high pH and temperature conditions, and promote harmful algal blooms, making detailed geostatistical mapping essential for ecosystem protection and water management (
Figure 10).
Chromatography: The chromatogram plot visually displays the concentration profiles of a wide range of ions and trace metals across multiple sampling sites from diverse locations such as HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, GARUN MALLAM, and GEZAWA. Each ion’s concentration is plotted as a line with markers spanning the various samples, making it straightforward to observe spatial trends, peaks, and relative abundances. This form of visualization highlights how concentrations of major cations (like Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+), anions (Cl-, SO4-, NO3-, HCO3-), and trace metals (Fe2+, Zn2+, Pb) vary from site to site, enabling identification of water quality patterns and potential contamination hotspots. The grouped x-axis by geographic areas helps compare water chemistry between regions at a glance. Such chromatogram plots serve as integration tools for complex multi-ion water quality data, effectively summarizing the chemical fingerprints of the sampled waters. Peaks in specific ions suggest elevated levels that may be driven by natural geochemical processes like mineral dissolution or anthropogenic activities such as industrial discharge or agricultural runoff. By simultaneously displaying numerous ions, the plot fosters a holistic interpretation of water composition and potential inter-ion relationships, informing environmental monitoring, groundwater resource management, and remediation strategies. Overall, chromatogram plots facilitate quick assessment of water chemistry variability and serve as a visual basis for more detailed hydrochemical analysis. This approach is a standard and established method in water quality laboratory analysis and monitoring.
Figure 11.
Chromatography plot of the study is. The chromatogram plot reveals distinct spatial variation in ion and trace metal concentrations across the sampling sites from HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, GARUN MALLAM, and GEZAWA areas. Major ions such as Na+, Ca, Mg, and HCO3- show consistent presence but with noticeable peaks indicating localized geochemical influences or contamination. Trace metals like Zn and Fe exhibit elevated levels at certain locations, suggesting possible anthropogenic inputs or mineralogical differences. Overall, the plot highlights diverse hydrochemical signatures reflecting natural and human impacts on groundwater quality across the different regions (
Figure 11).
Figure 11.
Chromatography plot of the study is. The chromatogram plot reveals distinct spatial variation in ion and trace metal concentrations across the sampling sites from HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, GARUN MALLAM, and GEZAWA areas. Major ions such as Na+, Ca, Mg, and HCO3- show consistent presence but with noticeable peaks indicating localized geochemical influences or contamination. Trace metals like Zn and Fe exhibit elevated levels at certain locations, suggesting possible anthropogenic inputs or mineralogical differences. Overall, the plot highlights diverse hydrochemical signatures reflecting natural and human impacts on groundwater quality across the different regions (
Figure 11).
Standard Calibration Curve: The Standard Calibration Curve plot is used to draw the pattern of known anion concentrations and their relative instrument signals; usually, a linear regression is fitted to such data. Considering the validity of your combined water quality data, the curves show that the responses of the instrument across the measured ranges of key ions such as Na+, Mg, Ca, Fe, Zn, and Pb increase proportionally to concentration. The linearity supports the need to assume that concentration and signal relate to each other directly and predictably, which is the guiding principle of quantitative analysis in unknown samples. Fitted plot lines depict the span of the scattered points of data, and slopes and intercepts are estimated by the regression analysis, which hence aids in computing the sample concentration based on the instrument signals. The effectiveness of these calibration curves is evidenced by the low degrees of spread of data points about the regression lines, which establishes good measurement accuracy and good reproducibility of instruments. Well-spaced standard concentrations with a wide range will minimize uncertainty in slope and intercept estimates, thus higher and better quantifications. These calibration curves can also be used as an aid to diagnose whether there is a deviation in ideal behaviour, i.e., there is nonlinearity or a large amount of noise, and then more evaluation of the analytical method would be necessary. On the whole, the Standard Calibration Curve graph is one of the core work instruments in analytical chemistry, as this allows conducting a robust and true quality of water analysis since it is a graph towards links the instrumental output to actual ion concentrations.
Figure 12.
Standard Calibration Curve: The Standard Calibration Curve graph shows that there is a high linear correlation of the ion concentration (Na
+, Mg
2+, Ca
2+, Fe
2+, Zn
2+, Pb
2+) against the instrument signal, thus the quantitative analysis of it is precise. The small area of scatter about the lines shows that there is good precision and certainty of the measurement consistency. Fluctuations on the slope of the ions indicate a disparity in the sensitivity of the instrument to both analytes. On the whole, the calibration curves confirm the appropriateness of the analytical method to be used in terms of defining the water quality of varied sample groups (
Figure 12).
Figure 12.
Standard Calibration Curve: The Standard Calibration Curve graph shows that there is a high linear correlation of the ion concentration (Na
+, Mg
2+, Ca
2+, Fe
2+, Zn
2+, Pb
2+) against the instrument signal, thus the quantitative analysis of it is precise. The small area of scatter about the lines shows that there is good precision and certainty of the measurement consistency. Fluctuations on the slope of the ions indicate a disparity in the sensitivity of the instrument to both analytes. On the whole, the calibration curves confirm the appropriateness of the analytical method to be used in terms of defining the water quality of varied sample groups (
Figure 12).
Scatter plot: Analysis based on the scatter plot of all generic water quality data of HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, GARUN MALLAM, and GEZAWA shows that the pair of selected ions was linked and had co-variations in varied locations. The scatter diagram can be used in plotting the major ions, such as Na+ against Mg, Ca vs Mg, and Zn versus Fe can help to find the positive consistency between major cations, which is most likely due to a common geological or hydrochemical origin, e.g., mineral dissolution and water-rock reaction. At the same time, other trace metals, including Zn and Fe, are variable, bringing out local geochemistry or manmade effects. The clustering of points based on location using different colors is also useful in the visual identification of regional differences in hydrochemical signatures. The scatter plot can also be used as an exploratory tool for the assessment of water quality, as it can show small groups of several samples with similar ionic compositions and possibly outliers that can point to the contamination or abnormal geochemical state. The trends noted in these scatter plots can also be used to assist in the multivariate analyses, which are presented in the form of principal component analysis, which ascertains the interpretation of complex data more efficiently. In general, this kind of visualization is the accepted and very effective method of environmental chemistry used to diagnose spatial variability in water chemistry and inform local monitoring or remediation. This is in tandem with conventional wisdom that scatter plots can give a quick look as to whether water quality parameters are linearly or non-linearly related to each other, and that this information can guide holistic planning over water resources (
Figure 13).
Principal Component of Curve: The Principal Component Curve graph prepared using the consolidated data of water quality of HOTORO, KANO MUNICIPAL, KUMBOTSO, GARUN MALLAM, and GEZAWA gives an account of consolidating multidimensional information on ion concentration into two principal components (principal element 1 and principal element 2) that represent the maximum of the variances. This dimensionality reduction shows important patterns and clusters in the dataset, and samples close to one another in the plot have comparable water chemistry profiles. Percentages of explained variance of PC1 and PC2 show the percentage of the overall variability in data that any of the PCs explain, giving an idea of the prevailing factors leading to the variation of the water quality over these areas. Also, the spatial distribution of groups by color samples on the PCA plot shows that each place has its own hydrochemical characteristics and possible natural or artificial factors that may affect it. The closer the two samples are, the more they tend to have similar ionic compositions, and conversely, the farther apart they are, the more different the water quality characteristics. The loadings (not included in the plot) behind these principal components normally indicate which ions are most responsible for these variations, and can therefore be used to guide further specific, environmentally or geochemically focused studies. On balance, this PCA visualization provides an efficient overview of complex datasets that can improve insights into the water chemistry variations in regions and enable data-based decisions to be made in managing the water resources (
Figure 14).
The Piper plot analysis of the presented water chemistry data shows the presence of various hydrochemical facies along the sampled locations, as the focus of the spatial variability map is placed on the variability in ionic composition. The cation triangle indicates the prevalence of Sodium (Na
+) and Potassium (K
+) in a number of samples, especially the water types with high Sodium content (e.g., more than 40 meq/L), strongly suggesting the influence of sodium-bearing minerals or a source of high Sodium content due to anthropogenic activities. Mg
2+ and Ca
2+ reservoirs vary considerably; locations with elevated calcium and Magnesium indicate waters subjected to the dissolution of carbonate rock or groundwater-rock interaction with typical waters of the Calcium-Magnesium bicarbonate or sulfate water variety. The anion triangle reveals an aggregate of areas dominated by the abundance of bicarbonate (HCO
3-), reflecting weak acid sites and other sites dominated by a high concentration of sulfate (SO
4 2-) and chloride (Cl
-), suggesting that the acidity is stronger due to industrial or agricultural contributions. These relative patterns of the various concentrations of these major ions give discrete groups or facies, indicating variations in conferring to the various geochemical processes such as silicate weathering, ion exchange, or source of contamination (
Figure 15).