Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A New Record of Antithamnion hubbsii (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Korean Coast: Invasive Species Interactions with Native and Non-Native Communities

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

26 August 2025

Posted:

28 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Taxonomic clarity within the genus Antithamnion is important in the molecular phylogeny of red algae. Antithamnion hubbsii is reported for the first time from the Korean coast, previously misidentified as A. nipponicum due to morphological similarities. Specimens collected from Gangneung were analyzed using plastid-encoded rbcL and psaA genes, confirming their identity as A. hubbsii. Korean specimens exhibit indeterminate lateral axes, oppositely arranged pinnae and pinnules, and distinctive gland cells on the adaxial surface of pinnules. Molecular analyses revealed minimal genetic divergence between the two species (1-3 base pair differences in rbcL, none in psaA). While PTP analysis differentiated them as distinct species, ASAP and ABGD analyses grouped them as a single species. Despite these results, our phylogenetic analyses showed Korean A. hubbsii forming a distinct clade with strong bootstrap support. However, further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic boundaries between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum. Our ecological observations revealed that this North American invasive species competes with both native red algal communities and established non-natives, apparently outcompeting A. nipponicum in shared habitats. This suggests potential shifts in community composition and ecological functions along the Korean coast as this invader spreads.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Marine ecosystems serve as habitats for various algal species, which play crucial roles as primary producers. Red algae (Rhodophyta) have adapted to diverse environments and are widely distributed throughout the world’s oceans (Rueness et al., 2007). Among them, the genus Antithamnion has received continuous attention from marine biologists due to its morphological diversity and ecological significance. For instance, Antithamnion nipponicum has been introduced to new regions, such as the Norwegian coast, highlighting the impact of globalization on marine ecosystems (Rueness, 2007). Additionally, Antithamnion sparsum has been recently recorded in the Northwest Atlantic, showcasing the ongoing spread of non-indigenous species in marine environments (Brooks and Krumhansl, 2023).
The study by Cho et al. (2007) made significant contributions to resolving taxonomic confusion within the genus Antithamnion. Their research clarified the relationship between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum while providing molecular evidence that A. nipponicum is distinct from A. pectinatum. However, later finds of a similar alga from the Azores (Athanasiadis & Tittley, 1994) were classified as A. pectinatum (Montagne) Brauner, with A. nipponicum reduced to synonymy (with a question mark), further illustrating the historical ambiguity surrounding these taxa. According to their findings, A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum have nearly identical rbcL gene sequences and share morphological characteristics, leading to the proposal that they may represent the same species. They confirmed the presence of A. nipponicum along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of North America, suggesting it was a recent introduction from Japan.
However, misidentifications within the genus Antithamnion remain common due to the high degree of morphological similarity among species (Cho et al. 2007). In particular, A. nipponicum and A. hubbsii possess very similar morphological features, making them difficult to distinguish using traditional methods alone. Cho et al. emphasized that the key identifying features of A. hubbsii include indeterminate lateral axes of pinnae, oppositely arranged pinnules, and gland cells located on the adaxial surface of pinnules.
Until now, only A. nipponicum has been reported from Korean waters, with no confirmed presence of A. hubbsii. However, through detailed morphological observations and molecular phylogenetic studies of specimens collected from the eastern coast of Gangneung, it was revealed that some specimens previously identified as A. nipponicum are actually A. hubbsii. This represents the first report of A. hubbsii in Korean waters, deepening our understanding of red algal biodiversity in Korea.
The introduction pathway of marine invasive species is often linked to international maritime activities. In the case of A. hubbsii in Korean waters, two potential introduction vectors are worthy of investigation. First, given that A. hubbsii has been well-documented along the Pacific coast of North America (Cho et al., 2007), increasing cruise ship traffic between North American ports and Korean destinations could serve as a potential vector. Cruise ships carry large volumes of ballast water and provide hull surface area for biofouling organisms, both of which are recognized as major pathways for marine species introductions (Carlton & Geller, 1993). Second, considering that Japan is geographically proximate to Korea and that A. nipponicum is native to Japanese waters, natural dispersal or smaller-scale maritime activities between Japan and Korea could have facilitated the introduction of A. hubbsii, especially if it was previously misidentified in Japan as well.
Our research employs both traditional morphological and modern molecular approaches to accurately identify and characterize A. hubbsii from Korean waters. This integrated approach is essential for distinguishing between morphologically similar species and establishing the phylogenetic relationships between Korean specimens and those from other regions. By documenting this new record and investigating its introduction pathway and ecological context, this study contributes to our understanding of marine biodiversity in Korea and provides valuable information for monitoring and managing non-native species in Korean coastal ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling, Culture and Microscopy

The samples were collected in the rocky intertidal of Sungeut beach (37°49′2.6″N, 128°53′40.5″E), Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do, Korea, on January 6, 2024. Culture conditions consisted of sterilized seawater supplemented with IMR (Institute of Marine Resources) medium as described by Klochkova et al. (2006). Samples were maintained at 20°C under cool-white fluorescent lights providing >20 µmol photons m−2 s−1, with a 16 h light ⁄ 8 h dark cycle. Culture maintenance involved transfer to new IMR medium every 7-14 days. Samples including the type specimen were deposited at the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK: AL00100***).
Live imaging was performed using an Olympus BX54 research microscope featuring differential interference contrast (DIC) capabilities and integrated with a Samsung iPolis imaging system (Samsung, Suwon, Korea). Nuclear visualization was performed following cell fixation in culture media using microwave irradiation for a few seconds. Subsequently, cells were stained with Hoeschst 33342 (1 μl/mL in the IMR medium) for 15 minutes under dark conditions prior to microscopic examination. Light and fluorescence microscopy images were merged using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software. The images were then analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) to quantify the length of the cells and the diameter of the nuclei.

2.2. Molecular Analysis

Total DNA was extracted from fresh or dried samples using the Chelex method (Zuccarello et al. 1999). The partial sequence of the plastid-encoded ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit gene (rbcL) was amplified using the primer pairs F321 and R1150 (Kang et al. 2020). PCR conditions followed a touchdown PCR as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 30sec, and a decrease in annealing temperature by 1°C per cycle, and 72°C for 1 min; followed by 25 cycles of 94°C for 1min, 45°C for 30sec, and 72°C for 1 min and a final step at 72°C for 5 min. Additionally, the partial sequence of the plastid-encoded photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1 gene (psaA) was amplified using the primer pairs psaA130F (5’-AACWACWACTTGGATTCGAA-3’) and psaA1760R (5’-CCTCTWCCWGGWCATCWCAWGG-3’) (Yoon et al. 2002; Saunders & Moore 2013). The PCR conditions for psaA followed a touchdown protocol: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 5 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 45°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min; then 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 46.5°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were purified using ZymocleanTM Gel DNA recovery Kit (Zymo Research, USA). PCR products were sent for commercial Sanger sequencing using both sets of PCR primers (Cosmogene Tech, Daejeon, Korea). Sequences were edited and assembled in Geneious® Prime 2025.1.2 (https://www.geneious.com).
For phylogenetic analyses, the newly determined rbcL and psaA sequences were analyzed alongside sequences from various Antithamnion and Anthithamnionella species, plus related genera downloaded from GenBank. Details of all specimens used in this study, including collection information, voucher numbers, and GenBank accession numbers, are presented in Table 1. The data set was aligned using MAFFT in Geneious® Prime 2025.1.2 (https://www.geneious.com) together with our new sequences of Antithamnion hubbsii collected from Korea (PV453999). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with IQ-TREE 2.3.4 (Minh et al. 2020). Codon positions were partitioned and the best-fit model was determined using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) and partition model (Chernomor et al. 2016). The rbcL DNA substitution models were selected for each codon (i.e., first codon: TN+F+I; second codon: F81+F+I; third codon: HKY+F+G4) were selected. The psaA DNA substitution models were selected for each codon (i.e., first codon: TIM2+F+G4; second codon: TIM+F+I; third codon: TPM3u+F+I) were selected. Support for each internal branch was determined by non-parametric bootstrap (500 replicates) (Felsenstein 1985). Bayesian inference analysis was conducted with MrBayes v. 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with partitioned codons using variable rates and six rate categories. Two parallel runs of Markov chain Monte Carlo were performed for 5,000,000 generations, sampling every 1,000 generations. Estimated sample sizes, split frequencies, and stationarity were checked after each run. After analysis, 10% of generations were removed as burn-in and the posterior probabilities were visualized in Figtree v1.1.4 (Rambaut 2009). Two DNA-based species delimitation methods were used to determine species status. For the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) method, the Kimura (K80) Ts/Tv 2.0 model was selected and analyzed from the ASAP online platform (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/). A tree-based method (Poisson-Tree processes, PTP; Zhang et al. 2013) was used online using the ML tree topology. Additionally, the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) method was applied using the online ABGD platform (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/abgdweb.html) with default parameters, including a relative gap width (X) of 1.5 and prior intraspecific divergence (P) values ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 (Puillandre et al. 2012). The final tree was then edited using Adobe Illustrator 2024 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Observations

Genus: Antithamnion
Species: Antithamnion hubbsii
Type locality: Intertidal, Pacific Grove, California, USA; (Dawson 1925)
Collection site in Korea: Antithamnion hubbsii collected from Sungeut beach, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do (37°49′2.6″N, 128°53′40.5″E); collected 6 January 2024.
Habitat: Intertidal, epiphytic on other macroalgae.
Holotype: Dawson E.Y. 1925. Specimens collected from intertidal zone, Pacific Grove, California, USA; deposited in the University of California Herbarium, Berkeley (UC), accession number UC 261983.
Paratype: KNU000620-KNU000622 (Sungeut beach (37°49′2.6″N, 128°53′40.5″E), Gangneung-si, Korea, 30 March 2013, Eunyoung Shim and Soo Yeon Kim); deposited in the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK).
Specimens examined: KNU000620- KNU000622 (Sungeut beach (37°49′2.6″N, 128°53′40.5″E), Gangneung-si, Korea, 30 March 2013, Eunyoung Shim and Soo Yeon Kim).
GenBank accession number: PV453999 (rbcL), PV454032 (psaA)
Description : Antithamnion hubbsii is a delicate red alga with filamentous thallus organization displaying distinct morphological features. Thalli are generally small, reaching approximately 1-5 cm in height, with a characteristic pinnate branching pattern (Figure 1B). Antithamnion hubbsii is characterized by a thallus composed of both prostrate and erect axes. The erect axis comprises main and indeterminate lateral axes of unlimited growth bearing opposite pinnae of determinate growth. Indeterminate lateral axes are irregularly produced from the basal cell of pinnae in erect axes (Figure 1D).
Vegetative features: The main axis consists of prominent axial cells (Ax) that are cylindrical and elongated (Figure 1A). Branching is primarily distichous (arranged in two rows), with distinct pinnae (Pn) and pinnules (Pl) forming a regular, feather-like appearance (Figure 1A). Apical cells (AC) are prominent at the tips of growing branches and are responsible for indeterminate growth (Figure 1A). Rhizoids (rh) develop from the lower portions of the thallus and serve as attachment structures (Figure 1A). Each branch originates from a basal cell (BC) at the nodes of the main axis (Figure 1C). A distinctive feature is the presence of spherical gland cells (GC) situated adjacent to basal cells of lateral branches (Figure 1C). These gland cells are typically colorless to pale and conspicuous under light microscopy, borne on pinnae, adaxial, and covering 2 cells as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Distinguishing characteristics of local and morphologically similar Antithamnion spp. as well as Antithamnionella.
Table 1. Distinguishing characteristics of local and morphologically similar Antithamnion spp. as well as Antithamnionella.
Species Gland cells Indeterminae laterals Pinnae Branching plane Tetrasporangia
New collection, Antithamnion hubsii
Shim & Kim, 2024
Borne on pinnae, adaxial, covering 2 cells Paired Pinnate (diploid)
Adaxially pectinate (haploid)
Distichous 1-cell pedicel
Antithamnion hubsii Dawson, 1963 Borne on pinnae, adaxial, covering 2 cells Paired Pinnate Distichous NA
Antithamnion nipponicum
Yamada et Inagaki
Borne on pinnae, adaxial, covering 2 cells Paired Pinnate Distichous 1-cell pedicel
Antithamnion cruciatum Nägeli, 1847 On pinnae, covering 2 cells Paired w/ determinate lateral Branched decussate Decussate 1-cell pedicel or sessile, tetrahedral
Antithamnion defectum Kylin, 1925 On pinnae, covering 2 cells Unpaired Branched, pectinate Distichous Pedicellate, undefined pedicel length
Antithamnion densum Howe, 1914 On pinnae, covering 2 cells Paired w/ determinate lateral Adaxially pectinate Distichous 1-cell pedicel
Antithamnion sparsum Tokida, 1932 On pinnae, covering 2 cells Unpaired Adaxially pectinate Distichous 1-cell pedicel
Antithamnionella spirographidis Wollaston, 1968 On primary branches, partly covering 1 cell Unpaired Simple Distichous Sessile
Figure 1. Morphological features of Antithamnion hubbsii. tetrasporophyte. Tetrasporophyte of A. hubbsii growing attached to intertidal rocks with distinctive bilateral branching pattern. (A) Light microscopy image showing pinnate branching pattern. AC: apical cell; IB: indeterminate branch; Pn: pinnule; PI: pinna; rh: rhizoid. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Higher magnification of central axis showing cellular organization. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; GC: gland cell. Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) Herbarium specimen of A. hubbsii tetrasporophyte showing overall thallus morphology and branching pattern. Scale bar = 1 cm. (D) Close-up view of lateral branches showing the insertion of indeterminate branches (IB) and the presence of gland cells (GC) at the adaxial surface of pinnules. Note the repeated bilateral branching and presence of reproductive structures (R). Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 1. Morphological features of Antithamnion hubbsii. tetrasporophyte. Tetrasporophyte of A. hubbsii growing attached to intertidal rocks with distinctive bilateral branching pattern. (A) Light microscopy image showing pinnate branching pattern. AC: apical cell; IB: indeterminate branch; Pn: pinnule; PI: pinna; rh: rhizoid. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Higher magnification of central axis showing cellular organization. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; GC: gland cell. Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) Herbarium specimen of A. hubbsii tetrasporophyte showing overall thallus morphology and branching pattern. Scale bar = 1 cm. (D) Close-up view of lateral branches showing the insertion of indeterminate branches (IB) and the presence of gland cells (GC) at the adaxial surface of pinnules. Note the repeated bilateral branching and presence of reproductive structures (R). Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Preprints 173972 g001
Reproductive structures: The tetrasporophyte bears spherical tetrasporangia (T) that develop on specialized short branches (Figure 2A). Tetrasporangia are typically borne singly or in pairs on the adaxial side of pinnae, adjacent to gland cells (Figure 2B). Each tetrasporangium is characterized by a distinctive 1-cell pedicel structure that differentiates it from other species in the genus (Table 1). Nuclear staining reveals the presence of a single large nucleus (N) in ordinary vegetative cells (Figure 2C; white arrow). Within each tetrasporangium, nuclear staining confirmed the presence of four small nuclei (n) corresponding to the four daughter cells formed during meiotic division (Figure 2C; red arrows), confirming the typical pattern of tetrasporogenesis seen in other red algae.
Sexual dimorphism: Male and female gametophytes show distinct morphological differences (Figure 3). These reproductive structures were observed after culturing tetrasporangia for 3-6 months under laboratory conditions. Male gametophytes display dense clusters of spermatangia (arrowheads) borne on spermatangial parent cells on special branches on the adaxial side of pinnules, giving a more tufted appearance (Figure 3A,A’). Female gametophytes maintain a more regular branching pattern with procarps (arrows) developing on the basal cells of pinnae (Figure 3B). Detailed examination of the female reproductive structures reveals the development of carpogonial branch cells (CB1-3) arranged in a characteristic pattern, with the terminal carpogonium extending a trichogyne (tr) for spermatial reception (Figure 3B’). The carpogonial branch is supported by a distinct supporting cell (Su) connected to the axial cell (Ax). The branching in female gametophytes appears more orderly and pinnate compared to the clustered organization in male plants.
Carposporophyte development: The development of carposporophytes was not observed in our cultured specimens during the study period. Therefore, further investigations under controlled conditions will be required to characterize the post-fertilization stages in A. hubbsii.
Distinguishing characteristics: As shown in Table 1, A. hubbsii can be distinguished from morphologically similar species by a combination of features. It has paired indeterminate laterals, pinnate arrangement in diploid phase and adaxially pectinate in haploid phase, and distichous branching plane. These characteristics, together with the distinctive gland cell arrangement and 1-cell pedicel of tetrasporangia, clearly differentiate A. hubbsii from other related species such as A. nipponicum, A. cruciatum, and A. defectum. While A. hubbsii shares some features with A. nipponicum, such as paired indeterminate laterals and distichous branching, our molecular analyses demonstrate that they represent distinct species.
This combination of morphological features, particularly the arrangement of pinnae, location of gland cells, and pattern of tetrasporangia development, supports the identification of this specimen as Antithamnion hubbsii, consistent with its phylogenetic placement shown in the molecular analyses.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

The 1467 base pairs (bp) of rbcL and 1523 bp of psaA were sequenced from samples collected in Korea. The phylogenetic trees were constructed by aligning the newly generated sequences with those downloaded from GenBank (Table 2, Figure 4).
Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on both rbcL (Figure 4A) and psaA (Figure 4B) sequences revealed that specimens collected from Sungeut Beach in Gangneung, South Korea formed a well-supported clade with previously reported Antithamnion hubbsii. In the rbcL phylogeny, our Korean A. hubbsii (PV453999) formed a strongly supported clade with A. hubbsii from California (AY591930) with bootstrap values of 98/99 for ML/Bayesian analyses. This clade was sister to A. nipponicum sequences with minimal genetic distance (0.25-0.29%). The psaA gene analysis similarly grouped our Korean A. hubbsii specimen (PV454032) with previously reported A. hubbsii (MK814610) with high statistical support (99.4/100), forming a sister relationship to A. nipponicum (AY295136) with only 0.34% genetic distance.
Both genes consistently placed the newly reported Korean specimens within the A. hubbsii lineage, distinct from but closely related to A. nipponicum. The ASAP and PTP analyses confirmed the species delimitation, specifically highlighting the distinct status of A. hubbsii from Sungeut Beach in Gangwon-do, South Korea. This represents the first report of A. hubbsii in Korean waters, as previous records of this species were primarily from the United States.
Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees of Antithamnion species based on (A) rbcL and (B) psaA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap support values (%) for ML analysis. The trees were rooted using Cystoclonium purpureum and Ceramium piluliferoides as outgroups for rbcL and psaA, respectively. Newly sequenced A. hubbsii specimens from Korea are indicated in bold. The matrices to the right of each tree summarize species delimitation results based on three methods: ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning), PTP (Poisson Tree Processes), and ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery). Black squares indicate groups recognized as separate species by each method. Conflicting results between ASAP and PTP analyses highlight the taxonomic uncertainty between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum.
Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees of Antithamnion species based on (A) rbcL and (B) psaA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap support values (%) for ML analysis. The trees were rooted using Cystoclonium purpureum and Ceramium piluliferoides as outgroups for rbcL and psaA, respectively. Newly sequenced A. hubbsii specimens from Korea are indicated in bold. The matrices to the right of each tree summarize species delimitation results based on three methods: ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning), PTP (Poisson Tree Processes), and ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery). Black squares indicate groups recognized as separate species by each method. Conflicting results between ASAP and PTP analyses highlight the taxonomic uncertainty between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum.
Preprints 173972 g004

4. Discussion

The present study documents the first confirmed occurrence of Antithamnion hubbsii in Korean waters, based on both detailed morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic evidence. The species has likely been misidentified as A. nipponicum in previous surveys due to their striking morphological similarities. This finding highlights the taxonomic complexity within the genus Antithamnion and emphasizes the importance of integrating molecular tools with traditional morphological approaches for accurate species identification in red algae (Saunders, 2005; Freshwater et al., 2010).
The taxonomic history of Antithamnion species has been marked by numerous revisions and reclassifications over the past century. The genus was first established by Nägeli (1847) and has since undergone significant taxonomic refinement. Our findings contribute to this ongoing taxonomic discourse by providing molecular evidence for the presence of A. hubbsii in Korean waters. The extremely close genetic relationship between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum revealed in our analyses (0.25-0.29% divergence in rbcL and 0.34% in psaA) reinforces the taxonomic challenges within this genus. While Cho et al. (2007) previously suggested these taxa might represent the same species based on minimal genetic differences, our ASAP analysis results support their distinction as separate species despite these minimal differences. This conclusion contradicts our PTP analysis results, which grouped them as a single species, reflecting the ongoing methodological challenges in delimiting species boundaries within closely related red algal taxa (Payo et al., 2013; Leliaert et al., 2014).
Although the origin of A. hubbsii in Korean waters remains uncertain, its presence calls for a re-assessment of regional red algal biodiversity, particularly in taxa with cryptic or morphologically similar species. Previous studies have shown that minimal genetic divergence can mask true taxonomic identity, highlighting the necessity for refined field sampling and the application of multi-locus molecular approaches (Steen & Scrosati, 2004; Freshwater et al., 2010).
At present, it remains unclear whether A. hubbsii is native to Korean waters or introduced. Regardless of its origin, its presence calls for a re-evaluation of red algal biodiversity in the region, particularly within genera that include cryptic or morphologically similar species. Previous studies have emphasized that even minimal genetic differences can obscure true taxonomic boundaries in red algae (Saunders, 2005; Payo et al., 2013). Future studies should aim to resolve these uncertainties through expanded field surveys and more refined molecular analyses (Steen & Scrosati, 2004; Freshwater et al., 2010).
These taxonomic challenges are not only of academic interest but also have important implications for biodiversity monitoring and non-native species management. Accurate identification of A. hubbsii contributes to our understanding of species diversity in Korean coastal ecosystems and may aid in improving detection of potential introductions. Given the morphological and genetic ambiguity between A. hubbsii and A. nipponicum, clarifying their taxonomic relationship is crucial (Leliaert et al., 2014; Olenin et al., 2011). A systematic re-evaluation of the genus Antithamnion will be essential to establish robust species boundaries, which in turn can inform ecological research and conservation strategies (Williams & Smith, 2007).

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the management of Marine and Fishery Bio-resources Center (2025) funded by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) and Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion(KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea(RS-2025-02303933) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1A2C1091633).

References

  1. Athanasiadis A and Tittley I. 1994. Antithamnioid algae (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae) newly recorded from the Azores. Phycologia 33, 77-80. [CrossRef]
  2. Brooks CM and Krumhansl K. 2023. First record of the Asian Antithamnion sparsum Tokida, 1932 (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) in Nova Scotia, Canada. BioInvasions Records 12:745-752.
  3. Carlton JT and Geller JB. 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78-82.
  4. Chernomor O, von Haeseler A and Minh BQ. 2016. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology 65:997-1008. [CrossRef]
  5. Cho TO, Boo SM, Hommersand MH, Maggs CA, McIvor L and Fredericq S. 2005. Gayliella gen. nov. in the tribe Ceramieae (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Journal of Phycology 41:726-738. [CrossRef]
  6. Cho TO, Won BY and Fredericq S. 2007. Antithamnion nipponicum (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta), incorrectly known as A. pectinatum in western Europe, is a recent introduction along the North Carolina and Pacific coasts of North America. European Journal of Phycology 40:323-335. [CrossRef]
  7. Dawson EY. 1925. Studies of intertidal algae at Pacific Grove, California. Bulletin of the California Academy of Sciences 24:31-59.
  8. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
  9. Freshwater DW, Tudor K, O’Shaughnessy K and Wysor B. 2010. DNA barcoding in the red algal order Gelidiales: Comparison of COI with rbcL and verification of the “barcoding gap”. Cryptogamie, Algologie 31:435-449.
  10. Hommersand MH, Freshwater DW, Lopez-Bautista JM and Fredericq S. 2009. Proposal of the Euptiloteae Hommersand et Fredericq, trib. nov. and transfer of some southern hemisphere Ptiloteae to the Callithamnieae (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology 45:1065-1080. [CrossRef]
  11. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A and Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14:587-589. [CrossRef]
  12. Kang JH, Jang JE, Kim JH and Kim MS. 2020. DNA barcoding of the genus Grateloupia (Rhodophyta) from Korea: An assessment of DNA barcoding markers for species identification. Diversity 12:3.
  13. Klochkova TA, Kang SH, Cho GY, Pueschel CM, West JA and Kim GH. 2006. Biology of a terrestrial green alga, Chlorococcum sp. (Chlorococcales, Chlorophyta), collected from the Miruksazi stupa in Korea. Phycologia 45:349-358. [CrossRef]
  14. Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, Vanormelingen P, Steen F, López-Bautista JM, Zuccarello GC and De Clerck O. 2014. DNA-based species delimitation in algae. European Journal of Phycology 49:179-196. [CrossRef]
  15. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A and Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37:1530-1534. [CrossRef]
  16. Nägeli C. 1847. Die neueren Algensysteme und Versuch zur Begründung eines eigenen Systems der Algen und Florideen. Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 9:1-275.
  17. Olenin S, Alemany F, Cardoso AC, Gollasch S, Goulletquer P, Lehtiniemi M, McCollin T, Minchin D, Miossec L, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Ojaveer H, Jensen KR, Stankiewicz M, Wallentinus I and Aleksandrov B. 2011. Marine Strategy Framework Directive – Task Group 2 Report: Non-indigenous species. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  18. Payo DA, Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, D’hondt S, Calumpong HP and De Clerck O. 2013. Extensive cryptic species diversity and fine-scale endemism in the marine red alga Portieria in the Philippines. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280:20122660. [CrossRef]
  19. Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S and Achaz G. 2012. ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 21:1864-1877. [CrossRef]
  20. Rueness J, Heggøy E, Husa V and Sjøtun K. 2007. First report of the Japanese red alga Antithamnion nipponicum on the west coast of Norway. Aquatic Invasions 2:431-434.
  21. Williams SL and Smith JE. 2007. A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38:327-359. [CrossRef]
  22. Yoon HS, Hackett JD and Bhattacharya D. 2002. A single origin of the peridinin- and fucoxanthin-containing plastids in dinoflagellates through tertiary endosymbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:11724-11729. [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P and Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29:2869-2876. [CrossRef]
  24. Zuccarello GC, Burger G, West JA and King RJ. 1999. A mitochondrial marker for red algal intraspecific relationships. Molecular Ecology 8:1443-1447. [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Tetrasporangial development in A. hubbsii. (A) Light microscopy image of tetrasporophyte showing mature tetrasporangia (T) distributed along the thallus. Pn: pinnule; PI: pinna. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Higher magnification of a mature tetrasporangium (T) showing characteristic 1-cell pedicel structure. BC: basal cell; GC: gland cell. Scale bar = 20 μm. (C) Fluorescence microscopy image of DAPI-stained tetrasporangia showing four nuclei (n) within a single tetrasporangium, confirming meiotic division. N: nucleus of vegetative cell. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 2. Tetrasporangial development in A. hubbsii. (A) Light microscopy image of tetrasporophyte showing mature tetrasporangia (T) distributed along the thallus. Pn: pinnule; PI: pinna. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Higher magnification of a mature tetrasporangium (T) showing characteristic 1-cell pedicel structure. BC: basal cell; GC: gland cell. Scale bar = 20 μm. (C) Fluorescence microscopy image of DAPI-stained tetrasporangia showing four nuclei (n) within a single tetrasporangium, confirming meiotic division. N: nucleus of vegetative cell. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Preprints 173972 g002
Figure 3. Morphological comparison of male and female reproductive structures in red algae A. hubbsii. (A) Male gametophyte showing spermatangia (arrowheads) borne on spermatangial parent cells on special branches on the adaxial side of pinnule. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; sc: spermatangial cluster; GC: gland cell. (B) Female gametophyte showing upper part with procarps (arrows) borne on basal cells of pinna. Note the development of carpogonial branch cells (CB1-3) and supporting structures. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; Su: supporting cell; tr: trichogyne; Au: auxiliary cell; Cp: carpogonium; Cy: cystocarp; Ft: foot cell; Fu: fusion cell; G: gonimoblast; Gi: gonimoblast initial; GI: first gonimolobes.
Figure 3. Morphological comparison of male and female reproductive structures in red algae A. hubbsii. (A) Male gametophyte showing spermatangia (arrowheads) borne on spermatangial parent cells on special branches on the adaxial side of pinnule. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; sc: spermatangial cluster; GC: gland cell. (B) Female gametophyte showing upper part with procarps (arrows) borne on basal cells of pinna. Note the development of carpogonial branch cells (CB1-3) and supporting structures. Ax: axial cell; BC: basal cell; Su: supporting cell; tr: trichogyne; Au: auxiliary cell; Cp: carpogonium; Cy: cystocarp; Ft: foot cell; Fu: fusion cell; G: gonimoblast; Gi: gonimoblast initial; GI: first gonimolobes.
Preprints 173972 g003
Table 2. Collections of Antithamnion and outgroup taxa from which rbcL and psaA were obtained.
Table 2. Collections of Antithamnion and outgroup taxa from which rbcL and psaA were obtained.
Species Location of collection and/or source of culture; collector or depositor Date GeneBank Accession NO.
ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene
Antithamnion aglandum
Kim et Lee
Jeoongdori, Wando, South Korea;
S.M. Boo, T.O. Cho & H.G. Choi
29.01.1999 AY594700
Antithamnion cruciatum Mulroy Bay, Co. Donegal, Ireland;
C.A. Maggs
16.02.1993 JN089394
Antithamnion defectum Sitka, AK, USA 21.06.2005 GO252484
Antithamnion defectum California, La Jolla, USA;
C.A. Maggs
27.07.1995 JN089391
Antithamnion defectum Skellig Rocks, Co. Kerry Ireland;
C.A. Maggs
01.06.1992 JN089395
Antithamnion hanovioides
(Sonder) De Toni
Pennington Bay, Kangaroo Island, S. Australia;
T.O. Cho & B.Y. Won
07.09.1995 AY591927
Antithamnion hubbsii Spain 07.05.2019 MK814610
Antithamnion hubbsii
Shim et Kim
Sungeut beach, Gangwon-do, South Korea;
E. Shim, S.Y. Kim & G.H. Kim
06.01.2024 PV453999
Antithamnion kylinii Canada JN089393
Antithamnion nipponicum
Yamada et Inagaki
Hachinohe, Aomori, Japan;
M. Kamiya
21.05.1995 AY594699
Antithamnion nipponicum
NC-1
In front of Duke University Marine Laboratory, Pivers I, Beaufort, Carteret Co., North Carolina, USA; T.O. Cho & B.Y. Won 29.10.2003 AY591928
Antithamnion nipponicum
Maengbang, Samcheok, South Korea;
E.C. Yang & S.M. Boo
2016 AY295174
Antithamnion nipponicum
CA
Halfmoon Bay, California, USA;
T.O. Cho & B.Y. Won
AY591930
Antithamnion nipponicum Aragami, Funakoshi, Yamada, Japan;
Masahiro Suzuki
29.08.2014 LC821146
Antithamnion pectinatum
(Montagne) Brauner
Lee Bay, Stewart Island, New Zealand;
W.A. Nelson
03.10.2004 DQ023481
Antithamnion pectinatum Kenton On Sea, South Africa;
Faith Mshiywa
24.11.2017 OR939842
Antithamnion sp. Mallacoota, VIC, Australia;
H. Verbruggen & K. Dixon
2019 MK125356
Antithamnion sp. Ewing Bank, Offshore Louisiana, USA;
J.Richards
29.05.2011 KY994130
Antithamnion sparsum
Tokida
Nova Sotia, Canada 2021 OP600459
Antithamnion sparsum Daechon, South Korea;
H.G. Cho
23.04.1992 JN089392
Antithamnion ternifolia
(Hooker et Harvey) Lyle
Williamston, Australia;
J. West
28.05.2002 AY591926
Amoenothamnion planktonicum WestAP, Australia OR359632
Antithamnionella miharai Youngeumjun, Sokcho, South Korea 09.05.2006 GQ252485
Antithamnionella spirographidis Monterey Bay, California, USA;
T.O. Cho
11.12.1999 AY591923
Photosystem I P700 apoprotein (psaA)
Aglaothamnion callophyllidicola Kamo Bay, Oki Island, Japan;
E.C. Yang & S.M. Boo
07.05.2003 DQ787601
Aglaothamnion hookeri Castilo San Cristobal, Canary, Spain 24.04.2004 EU195020
Antithamnion hubbsii MK814610
Antithamnion hubbsii
Shim et Kim
Sungeut beach, Gangwon-do, South Korea;
E. Shim, S.Y. Kim & G.H. Kim
06.01.2024 PV454032
Antithamnion nipponicum - 2019 AY295136
Antithamnionella sp. Choshi, Chiba, Japan;
E.C. Yang & S.M. Boo
27.07.2002 DQ787600
Antithamnionella ternifolia - 2019 MK814608
Campylaephora kondoi Hakampo, Taean, South Korea;
E.C. Yang & S.M. Boo
2003 AY295138
Corallina pilulifera Nagasaki, Choshi, Chiba, Japan;
E.C. Yang & S.M. Boo
01.08.2004 DQ787594
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated