Submitted:
26 August 2025
Posted:
27 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Spontaneous Combustion Gangue
2.1. Selecting and Using Principles
2.2. Crushing and Screening
2.3. Basic Performance
3. Spontaneous Combustion Coal Gangue Fine Stone Concrete
3.1. The Basic Requirements of Fine Stone Concrete
3.2. Raw Materials of Fine Stone Concrete
3.3. The Mix Proportion of Fine Stone Concrete
3.4. The Performance of Fine Stone Concrete
3.4.1. Mechanical Property
3.4.2. Freeze-Thaw Test
3.4.3. Carbonization Test
4. Spontaneous Combustion Coal Gangue Board
4.1. Design and Maintenance
4.2. Performance Test
5. Application of Spontaneous Combustion Coal Gangue Composite Exterior Wallboard
5.1. Segmentation of Building Exterior Wall
5.2. Spontaneous Combustion Coal Gangue Composite Board
5.3. On-Site Installation
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhu, L.; Gu, W.Z.; He, Z.W.; Liu, C.Y.; Zhao, M.Y. Current situation of comprehensive utilization of coal gangue and exploration of ways of high-value utilization: A case study of china national coal group corporation. Coal Science and Technology 2025, 53, 104–124. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.P; Wu, S.W; Zhang, C. Activation of Se-enriched coal gangue and the efficient use of coal gangue Se fertilizer. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers 2020, 26, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, A.G.; Liu, P.; Sun, D.S.; Liu, K.W.; Fang, L.A. Research progress in activity evaluation methods of calcined coal gangue powder materials. Materials Reports 2018, 32, 1903–1909. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.J; Song, H.P; Feng, Z.J.; Munkhbat, B.; Jin, D.P.; Wei, J.J. Study on the effect of coal gangue particle size and ratio on desertified soil improvement. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology 2025, 15, 780–787. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y., Hu; Zhang, X.Y.; Gao, T.; Wang, S.J. Experimental study on compressive properties of modified raw soil mixed with coal gangue powder and mineral powder. Building structure 2022, 52, 2202–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H. Study on aerated concrete block preparation used with fly ash and coal gangue of fuxin. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2013, 32, 1932–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Q.; Gu, J.; Chen, W.J.; Xiang, H.; Guo, Z.H. Effect of coal gangue fine aggregate modification treatment on mortar performance. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2025, 44, 2193–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, M.J.; Huang, B.; Chen, H.X.; Zhang, D.S. Research on damage of unburned coal gangue coarse aggregate concrete after high temperature. Building structure 2022, 52, 1566–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.H.; Wang, Y.B.; Ma, S.X.; Li, M. Energy storage modification of coal gangue and its application inhigh-specific-energy batteries. Coal Science and Technology 2025, 53, 318–326. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, L.; Gu, W.Z.; He, Z.W.; Liu, C.Y.; Zhao, M.Y. Current situation of comprehensive utilization of coal gangue and exploration of ways of high-value utilization: A case study of china coal [J/OL]. Coal Science and Technology, 1–20 [2025-08-10]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2402.TD.20250424.1434.002.
- Zhao, L.Y.; Zhai, H.B.; Zhang, J.W.; Yan, K.Z.; Yang, F.L. Mineral occurrence and acid leaching characteristic of aluminum forcoal gangue in shanxi province. Coal Science and Technology 2025, 53, 434–444. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.M.; Su, N.J.; Zhu, B.S.; Liang, L.P.; Tian, Y.M. Fe3O4 and Fe loaded composites as microwave absorbents by recycling of gangue. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2021, 40, 2998–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.G.; Tao, X.K.; Yu, S.Y.; Li, S.S.; Zhang, R.H. Research progress on the application of high-performance composite sandwich exterior wall panels. Building structure 2020, 50, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.H.; Meng, F.H.; Wang, L.N.; Dai, L.F.; Yao, L.F. Preparation and properties of coal gangue-based foamed ceramics. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2023, 42, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 6566-2010 “Limits of Radionuclides in Building Materials” [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2010.
- GB 8624-2012 “Classification for Burning Behavior of Building Materials and Products” [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2012.
- GB/T 14685-2022 “Pebble and Crushed Stone for Construction” [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2022.
- GB 50016-2014 “Code for Fire Protection Design of Buildings” [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2014.
- JGJ 55-2011 “Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete” [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011.
- GB/T 50010-2010 “Standard for Design of Concrete Structures” [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
- GB/T 30100-2013 “Test Methods for Building Panels” [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2013.
- GB/T 30100-2013 “Test Methods for Building Panels” [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2013.






















|
Detection Project |
Radioactivity Specific Activity (Bq/kg) | Internal Exposure | External Exposure | standard | ||
| Ra-226 | Th-232 | K-40 | ||||
| index | 94.23 | 71.56 | 509.74 | 0.45 | 0.61 | Ir<1.0 |
| Essential Component | Al2O3 | SiO2 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | K2O |
| Content(%) | 14.8 | 54.1 | 14.2 | 12.4 | 2.4 | 1.1 |
| Square hole sieve size (mm) |
Screen oversize (kg) |
Retained (%) |
Cumulative retained (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.0 | 0 | / | / |
| 9.5 | 0.05 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| 4.75 | 1.03 | 54.3 | 57.1 |
| 2.36 | 0.79 | 38.7 | 95.8 |
| Square hole sieve size | Screen oversize (g) |
Retained (%) |
Cumulative retained(%) | Standard(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.75mm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10~0 |
| 2.36mm | 23 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 25~0 |
| 1.18mm | 123 | 24.6 | 29.2 | 50~10 |
| 600μm | 120 | 24 | 53.2 | 70~41 |
| 300μm | 12 | 18.4 | 71.6 | 92~70 |
| 150μm | 52 | 10.4 | 82 | 94~80 |
| Physics Indicators |
grain size(mm) | Molded cylinder compressive strength (MPa) |
Apparent Density(kg·m-3) | Bulk Density(kg·m-3) | Water Absorption(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse Aggregate |
5~10 | 2.5 | 2440 | 1132 | 9.6 |
| Physics Indicators |
Apparent Density(kg·m-3) | Aggregate Size(mm) | Bulk Density(kg·m-3) | Fineness Modulus | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine Aggregate |
2441 | <3mm | 1209 | 2.41 | medium sand |
| Cement | Fine Aggregate | Coarse Aggregate | Fly Ash | Water Reducing Admixture |
Water | Short Fiber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 280 | 326 | 1525 | 31 | 4.5 | 338 | 2.0 |
| Age(d) | 3 | 7 | 14 | 28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength Measured value(MPa) |
1 | 7.0 | 13.7 | 16.9 | 21.7 |
| 2 | 6.6 | 13.4 | 16.8 | 20.8 | |
| 3 | 6.5 | 12.8 | 15.9 | 20.5 | |
| Average Value | 6.7 | 13.3 | 16.5 | 21.0 | |
| Test Grou- ping |
Number of Speci- mens |
Before the freeze-thaw cycle | Loop Number of times |
After the freeze-thaw cycle | Average mass loss rate(%) | Average dynamic elastic modulus loss rate(%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality mean (kg) |
Mean value of dynamic elastic modulus(GPa) | Quality mean (kg) |
Mean value of dynamic lastic modulus(GPa) | |||||
| Ⅰ | 3 | 8.20 | 16.65 | 25 | 7.56 | 11.83 | 7 | 30 |
| Ⅱ | 3 | 8.28 | 17.40 | 28 | 7.56 | 10.85 | 8 | 37 |
| Ⅲ | 3 | 8.14 | 17.33 | 29 | 7.35 | 10.72 | 9 | 38 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).