Submitted:
26 August 2025
Posted:
26 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Deterioration considerations on the case study system
3. Problem Statement for the Case Study: Industrial Shredders
- Monitoring complexity. The deterioration of the hammers is not directly measurable; this must be estimated from reliable indicators of the state of health.
- High impact of SEC usage on maintenance decisions. Increasing energy consumption directly affects when and how maintenance is performed.
- High-cost spare parts. Hammers are the most critical components and expensive to replace because of the materials, tools, and scale.
- Limited availability. Spare set of hammers are commonly rarely available, leading to potential downtime.
- Deficient use of SEC data. Despite the abundance of SEC data, it is often not utilized effectively for maintenance and operational decisions.
- Low number of complete information frames. There is a scarcity of comprehensive data sets that link SEC information directly to maintenance activities.
- Not enough plots to perform statistical analysis. The limited data available hampers the ability to perform robust statistical analyzes.
- Exploiting incomplete data. It is crucial to utilize available data as much as possible, even if the data sets are incomplete.
- Real-time comparison of new production information. Systematically comparing new SEC data in real time can help identify high production and low energy consumption zones.
- Conservative real testing. Real testing would require modifications to current production, which could surely be significant. Therefore, scenarios should be conservative to minimize costs.
- Probabilistic certification. The process can be probabilistically certified to ensure reliability.
- Progressive data integration. New real information can be progressively added to the built database to improve it.
4. Data-Driven Deterioration Model
4.1. Validation of the deterioration model
4.2. Specific Energy Consumption (SEC)
5. Hybrid Architecture for RUL Estimation
6. Architecture Application for RUL Estimation
6.1. Synthetic Database Generation
6.2. Comparator
6.3. Feature Extraction
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Symbol | Units | Physical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| A | – | Autoregressive polynomial |
| B | – | Input polynomial |
| D | – | Deterioration |
| kW* | Power of motor, Output of system | |
| t** | Mass of cane | |
| t | h*** | Time |
| t/h | sugarcane flow, Input of system | |
| kWh | Energy | |
| kWh/t | Energy consumption per tonne of cane | |
| ^ | – | Superscript for estimations |
| ˙ | – | Superscript for derivative |
| ref | – | Superscript for reference |
| NRMSE | – | Root Mean Squared Error |
| PHM | – | Prognostics and Health Management |
| RUL | h | Remaining Useful Life |
References
- Zio, E. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022, 218, 108119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikorska, J.Z.; Hodkiewicz, M.; Ma, L. Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mechanical systems and signal processing 2011, 25, 1803–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolai, R.P.; Dekker, R.; Van Noortwijk, J.M. A comparison of models for measurable deterioration: An application to coatings on steel structures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92, 1635–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heng, A.; Zhang, S.; Tan, A.C.; Mathew, J. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mechanical systems and signal processing 2009, 23, 724–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayyad, S.; Kumar, S.; Bongale, A.; Kamat, P.; Patil, S.; Kotecha, K. Data-driven remaining useful life estimation for milling process: sensors, algorithms, datasets, and future directions. IEEE access 2021, 9, 110255–110286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, K.; Gouriveau, R.; Li, X.; Zerhouni, N. Tool wear monitoring and prognostics challenges: a comparison of connectionist methods toward an adaptive ensemble model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2018, 29, 1873–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, X.S.; Wang, W.; Hu, C.H.; Zhou, D.H. Remaining useful life estimation–A review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 213, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, J.J.; Spinola Félix, M.; Kulkarni, C.; Orchard, M.; Bérenguer, C. A novel dynamical model for diagnosis, prognosis and health-aware control of Lithium-ion batteries. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2024, 58, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Huang, F.; Qin, H.; Pan, J. Research on remaining useful life prediction of bearings based on MBCNN-BiLSTM. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 7706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berghout, T.; Benbouzid, M. A systematic guide for predicting remaining useful life with machine learning. Electronics 2022, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remadna, I.; Terrissa, S.; Sayah, M.; Ayad, S.; Zerhouni, N. Boosting RUL prediction using a hybrid deep CNN-BLSTM architecture. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 2022, 56, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wu, D.; Hu, C.; Terpenny, J. An ensemble learning-based prognostic approach with degradation-dependent weights for remaining useful life prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2019, 184, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z.; Du, S.; Lv, J.; Deng, Y.; Jia, S. A hybrid prognostics deep learning model for remaining useful life prediction. Electronics 2020, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Gebraeel, N.; Lei, Y.; Fang, X.; Cai, X.; Yan, T. Remaining useful life prediction based on a multi-sensor data fusion model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2021, 208, 107249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Obando, D.; Rosero-García, J.; Rosero, E. Dynamic Data-Driven Deterioration Model for Sugarcane Shredder Hammers Oriented to Lifetime Extension. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakowsky, U.K. Modelling Reliability-Adaptive multi-system operation. International Journal of Automation and Computing 2006, 3, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, T.; Sextro, W. Closed-loop Control System for the Reliability of Intelligent Mechatronic Systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society - 2014 - Paderborn, Germany; ASME., Ed., number 265 in 2003-TRIB-265; 2014; pp. 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langeron, Y.; Grall, A.; Barros, A. Joint maintenance and controller reconfiguration policy for a gradually deteriorating control system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 2017, 231, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosso, J.M.; Ocampo-Martínez, C.; Puig, V. A service reliability model predictive control with dynamic safety stocks and actuators health monitoring for drinking water networks. In Proceedings of the Decision and Control (CDC), 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st Annual Conference on. IEEE; pp. 4568–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, E.B.; Galvão, R.K.H.; Yoneyama, T. Model predictive control using prognosis and health monitoring of actuators. In Proceedings of the Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE; pp. 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Huynh, K.T.; Langeron, Y.; Grall, A. Degradation index construction and learning-based prognostics for stochastically deteriorating feedback control systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2023, 238, 109460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bevan, A.; Molyneux-Berry, P.; Eickhoff, B.; Burstow, M. Development and validation of a wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue damage model. Wear 2013, 307, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cremona, M.A.; Liu, B.; Hu, Y.; Bruni, S.; Lewis, R. Predicting railway wheel wear under uncertainty of wear coefficient, using universal kriging. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2016, 154, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Obando, D.J.; Martinez Molina, J.J.; Berenguer, C. Deterioration estimation for remaining useful lifetime prognosis in a friction drive system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017, 50, 12785–12790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamir, M. On probabilistic certification of combined cancer therapies using strongly uncertain models. Journal of theoretical biology 2015, 384, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamo, T.; Tempo, R.; Camacho, E.F. Randomized strategies for probabilistic solutions of uncertain feasibility and optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2009, 54, 2545–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


















Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).