Submitted:
25 August 2025
Posted:
26 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgements
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Guo, K.; Russek-Cohen, E.; A. VArner, M.; Kohn, R. Effects of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Other Factors on Probability of Conception of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 1878–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhoads, M.; Rhoads, R.; Gilbert, R.; Toole, R.; Butler, W. Detrimental effects of high plasma urea nitrogen levels on viability of embryos from lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 91, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tshuma, T.; Holm, D.E.; Fosgate, G.T.; Lourens, D.C. Pre-breeding blood urea nitrogen concentration and reproductive performance of Bonsmara heifers within different management systems. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2014, 46, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlsson, J.; Pehrson, B. The Relationships Between Seasonal Variations in the Concentration of Urea in Bulk Milk and the Production and Fertility of Dairy Herds. J. Veter- Med. Ser. A 1993, 40, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rhoads, M.; Gilbert, R.; Lucy, M.; Butler, W. Effects of Urea Infusion on the Uterine Luminal Environment of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 2896–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ocon, O.; Hansen, P. Disruption of Bovine Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos by Urea and Acidic pH. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Wit, A.; Cesar, M.; Kruip, T. Effect of Urea During In Vitro Maturation on Nuclear Maturation and Embryo Development of Bovine Cumulus-Oocyte-Complexes. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 1800–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammon, D.; Holyoak, G.; Dhiman, T. Association between blood plasma urea nitrogen levels and reproductive fluid urea nitrogen and ammonia concentrations in early lactation dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 86, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, F.A.; Gomez, R.G.G.; Joaquim, D.C.; Watanabe, Y.F.; de Castro e Paula, L.A.; Binelli, M.; Rodrigues, P.H.M. Short-term urea feeding decreases in vitro hatching of bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 312–319.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamman, R.; Thompson, P.N.; Smuts, M.P.; Tshuma, T.; Holm, D.E. Oocyte quality and viability in Nguni and Hereford cows exposed to different levels of dietary protein. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2019, 51, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tshuma, T.; Fosgate, G.T.; Hamman, R.; Holm, D.E. Effect of different levels of dietary nitrogen supplementation on the relative blood urea nitrogen concentration of beef cows. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2019, 51, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fricke, P. Scanning the Future—Ultrasonography as a Reproductive Management Tool for Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1918–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holm, D.E.; Nielen, M.; Jorritsma, R.; Irons, P.C.; Thompson, P.N. Ultrasonographic reproductive tract measures and pelvis measures as predictors of pregnancy failure and anestrus in restricted bred beef heifers. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pande, M.; Srivastava, N.; Soni, Y.; Kumar, S.; Singh, J.; Chand, N.; Saha, S.; Mathur, A. Comparative efficacy of the therapeutics of recurrent genital prolapse in indigenous cows. Theriogenology Insight - Int. J. Reprod. all Anim. 2017, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, I. , Recovering the bovine oocyte, in Laboratory production of cattle embryos. 2003. p. 79–112.
- Jooste, F. , The association between foot-and-mouth disease virus and bovine oocytes and embryos during in vitro embryo production, in Production Animal Studies. 2005, University of Pretoria. p. 111.
- Wright, J.M. , Photographic illustrations of embryo developmental stage and quality codes, in Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society, D.A. Stringfellow and S.M. Siedel, Editors. 1998, IETS, Savoy: Illinois. p. 167 – 170.
- Ferguson, J.D.; Galligan, D.T.; Blanchard, T.; Reeves, M. Serum Urea Nitrogen and Conception Rate: The Usefulness of Test Information. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 3742–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Bojalil, C.; Staples, C.; Thatcher, W.; Drost, M. Protein Intake and Development of Ovarian Follicles and Embryos of Superovulated Nonlactating Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2537–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawuda, P.; Scaramuzzi, R.; Leese, H.; Hall, C.; Peters, A.; Drew, S.; Wathes, D. Effect of timing of urea feeding on the yield and quality of embryos in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2002, 58, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, D.A.; Boland, M.P.; Diskin, M.G.; Sreenan, J.M. Effect of rumen degradable protein with or without fermentable carbohydrate supplementation on blood metabolites and embryo survival in cattle. Anim. Sci. 2002, 74, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinclair, K.D.; Kuran, M.; E Gebbie, F.; Webb, R.; McEvoy, T.G. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle: II. Development of oocytes recovered from heifers offered diets differing in their rate of nitrogen release in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 2670–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowsar, R.; Izadi, F.; Sadeghi, N.; Riasi, A.; Zadegan, F.G.; Hajian, M.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.H.; Farrokhpour, H.; Miyamoto, A. Urea changes oocyte competence and gene expression in resultant bovine embryo in vitro. Zygote 2018, 26, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, P.; Marques, A.; Antunes, G.; Chaveiro, A.; Andrade, M.; Borba, A.; Da Silva, F.M. Effects of Plasma Urea Nitrogen Levels on the Bovine Oocyte Ability to Develop After In vitro Fertilization. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowsar, R.; Iranshahi, V.N.; Sadeghi, N.; Riasi, A.; Miyamoto, A. Urea influences amino acid turnover in bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes, cumulus cells and denuded oocytes, and affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Britt, J.H. Oocyte development in cattle: physiological and genetic aspects. Rev. Bras. de Zootec. 2008, 37, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aerts, J.; Bols, P. Ovarian Follicular Dynamics: A Review with Emphasis on the Bovine Species. Part I: Folliculogenesis and Pre-antral Follicle Development. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tshuma, T.; Fosgate, G.; Webb, E.; Swanepoel, C.; Holm, D. Effect of Temperature and Humidity on Milk Urea Nitrogen Concentration. Animals 2023, 13, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Vries, A.; Risco, C. Trends and Seasonality of Reproductive Performance in Florida and Georgia Dairy Herds from 1976 to 2002. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 3155–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroy, J.; Van Soom, A.; Opsomer, G.; Goovaerts, I.; Bols, P. Reduced Fertility in High-yielding Dairy Cows: Are the Oocyte and Embryo in Danger? Part II Mechanisms Linking Nutrition and Reduced Oocyte and Embryo Quality in High-yielding Dairy Cows*. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammon, D.; Wang, S.; Holyoak, G. Effects of ammonia during different stages of culture on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 59, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Diet | |||
| LCP | NCP | HCP | |
| Dry matter % | 89.5 | 89.6 | 89.8 |
| Crude protein %a | 4.4 | 7.9 | 14 |
| RUP as a % of crude proteina | 42.6 | 36.9 | 36.1 |
| Fat %a | 2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Total digestible nutrients %a | 48.9 | 52.6 | 51.5 |
| Normal BUN (7mg/dL<BUN<20mg/dL) |
Extreme BUN (20mg/dL<BUN<7mg/dL) |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspiration sessions | 22 | 22 | ||
| Antral follicles counted | 2743 | 1585 | 4328 | |
| Recovered oocyte grades | Grade 1 | 16 (2%) | 12 (2%) | 28 |
| Grade 2 | 49 (5%) | 28 (5%) | 77 | |
| Grade 3 | 283 (28%) | 143 (25%) | 426 | |
| Grade 4 | 452 (44%) | 226 (39%) | 678 | |
| Degenerate | 228 (22%) | 164 (29%) | 392 | |
| Total oocytes | 1028 | 573 | 1601 | |
| Model | Variable | SE | HR | 95% CI of HR | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Model 1 | BUN | 0.167 | 0.072 | 1.181 | 1.027 | 1.360 | 0.020 |
| Breed | -0.021 | 0.069 | 0.979 | 0.856 | 1.120 | 0.757 | |
| Model 2 | BUN | 0.274 | 0.100 | 1.316 | 1.082 | 1.599 | 0.006 |
| Breed | 0.060 | 0.087 | 1.062 | 0.896 | 1.258 | 0.488 | |
| Breed*BUN | -0.223 | 0.145 | 0.800 | 0.601 | 1.064 | 0.125 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).