Submitted:
07 August 2025
Posted:
11 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Imaging
- Early planar scintigraphy – performed 30 minutes after injection (~113 MBq, acquisition time 600 s) using a Mediso AnyScan SC gamma camera.
- SPECT/CT – performed 1hours after injection (~107 MBq, acquisition time 600 s) using the Mediso AnyScan SPECT/CT system; the additional radiation dose from the CT component was estimated at 1–4 mSv [19].
- Delayed planar scintigraphy – performed 18 hours after injection (~15 MBq, acquisition time 600 s) on the day of surgery.
2.4. Histopathological Analysis
2.5. Quantitative Metrics and Statistical Analysis
2.6. SLN Evaluation Parameters
- Detection sensitivity: The percentage of patients with at least one SLN identified and confirmed intraoperatively and histologically. This metric was based on delayed (18-hour) scintigraphy, which was used for surgical planning.
- Bilateral detection: The proportion of cases with at least one SLN identified on each side of the pelvis.
- Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV): Calculated based on intraoperative and histopathological verification of SLNs identified on 18-hour scintigraphic images.
- Quantitative metrics: Mean values and standard deviations of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast factor (C-factor), analyzed independently for each imaging protocol.
2.7. Institutional Review Board Statement
2.8. Informed Consent Statement
3. Results



4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lu KH, Broaddus RR. Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 , Nov 19;383(21):2053-2064.
- Smith B, Backes F. The role of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015, Dec;112(7):753-60.
- Frati A, Ballester M. Contribution of Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Women with Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results of the SENTI-ENDO Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1980-6.
- Mar MV, Miller SA,. Evaluation and localization of lymphatic drainage and sentinel lymph nodes in patients with head and neck melanomas by hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphic imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007, Mar;35(1):10-6; quiz 17-20.
- Ballinger JR. Challenges in Preparation of Albumin Nanoparticle-Based Radiopharmaceuticals. Molecules. 2022, Dec 6;27(23):8596.
- Szatkowski W, Słonina D,. The role of technetium-99m isotope in sentinel lymph node identification in gynecological cancers. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025, Jun 7;30(2):257-268.
- Bats AS, Lavoué V,. Limits of day-before lymphoscintigraphy to localize sentinel nodes in women with cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Aug;15(8):2173-9.
- Papadia, A.; Zapardiel, I. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma: A focus on bilateral mapping identification by comparing radiotracer Tc99m with blue dye versus indocyanine green fluorescent dye. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 143, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szatkowski W, Pniewska K,. The Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Methods in Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Med. 2025, Jan 21;14(3):676.
- Tew K, Farlow D. SPECT/CT in Melanoma Lymphoscintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2016, Dec;41(12):961-963.
- Even-Sapir E, Lerman H,. Lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node mapping using a hybrid SPECT/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2003, Sep;44(9):1413-20.
- Togami S, Kawamura T,. Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020, May;30(5):626-630.
- Navarro AS, Angeles MA. Comparison of SPECT-CT with intraoperative mapping in cervical and uterine malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021, May;31(5):679-685.
- Buda A, Elisei F,. Integration of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of sentinel node in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer: our experience and literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012, Jun;22(5):830-5.
- Martínez A, Zerdoud S,. Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2010, Dec;119(3):431-5.
- Belhocine TZ, Prefontaine M,. Added-value of SPECT/CT to lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in gynaecological cancers. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 3(2):182-93.
- Szatkowski W, Popieluch J. Numerical Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Detection Using Technetium-99m: A Step Toward Objective Scintigraphy Evaluation in Oncology. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems. 2025, ;21(1):7-12.
- Female Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 4.
- Buck AK, Nekolla S. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2008, Aug;49(8):1305-19.
- Bi WL, Hosny A,. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019, Mar;69(2):127-157.
- Li J, Zhuang Z,. Advances and perspectives in nanoprobes for noninvasive lymph node mapping. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015;10(6):1019-36.
- SENTI-ENDO Trial Group. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: A multicenter prospective validation study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(18):2159–2166.
- Ogawa S, Kobayashi H. Sentinel node detection with (99m)Tc phytate alone is satisfactory for cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010, Feb;15(1):52-8.
- Ballester M, Rouzier R. Limits of lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node biopsy in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009, Feb;112(2):348-52.
- Frumovitz M, Coleman RL. Usefulness of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, Apr;194(4):1186-93.
- Pandit-Taskar N, Gemignani ML. Single photon emission computed tomography SPECT-CT improves sentinel node detection and localization in cervical and uterine malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010, Apr;117(1):59-64.
- Zhang WJ, Zheng R. [Clinical application of sentinel lymph node detection to early stage cervical cancer]. Ai Zheng. 2006, Feb;25(2):224-8.
- Kraft O, Havel M. Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Gynecologic Tumours by Planar Scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012, Aug;21(2):47-55.
- van der Ploeg IM, Valdés Olmos RA. The additional value of SPECT/CT in lymphatic mapping in breast cancer and melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2007, Nov;48(11):1756-60.
- Dampali R, Nikolettos K. The Impact of Body Mass Index on Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Endometrial Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2025, Apr;45(4):1575-1581.
- van der Ploeg IM, Valdés Olmos RA. The impact of body mass index on sentinel lymph node visualization using planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008, 35(5):780–785.
- Law M, Ma WH. Evaluation of patient effective dose from sentinel lymph node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: a phantom study with SPECT/CT and ICRP-103 recommendations. Eur J Radiol. 2012, May;81(5):e717-20.
- Le TD, Shitiri NC. Image Synthesis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging with Deep Learning: A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2024, Dec 18;24(24):8068.
| Feature | Characteristic | N | % |
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 67.5 ± 9.7 | – |
| Histologic Type | Endometrioid | 109 | 87.20% |
| Serous | 10 | 8.00% | |
| Clear-Cell | 6 | 4.80% | |
| Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI) | Present | 17 | 13.60% |
| Absent | 108 | 86.40% | |
| Myometrial Invasion |
0% | 19 | 15.20% |
| <50% | 74 | 59.20% | |
| >50% | 32 | 25.60% | |
| Lymphadenectomy | Performed | 22 | 17.60% |
| Not Performed | 103 | 82.40% | |
| FIGO Stage | IA | 29 | 23.20% |
| IB | 57 | 45.60% | |
| II | 16 | 12.80% | |
| IIIA | 4 | 3.20% | |
| IIIB | 2 | 1.60% | |
| IIIC1 | 13 | 10.40% | |
| IIIC2 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| FIGO Grade | G1 | 60 | 48.00% |
| G2 | 53 | 42.40% | |
| G3 | 12 | 9.60% | |
| BMI Category | <25 | 8 | 6.40% |
| 25–29.9 | 19 | 15.20% | |
| ≥30 | 93 | 74.40% | |
| Total | 125 | 100.00% |
| Parameter | 30-Minute Planar Scintigraphy | SPECT/CT | 18-Hour Planar Scintigraphy |
| Overall Detection Rate (%) | 72.00% (90/125)* | 87.20% (109/125)* | 94.40% (118/125) |
| Bilateral Detection Rate (%) | 60.00% (75/125)* | 73.60% (92/125)* | 80.80% (101/125)† |
| Intraoperative Confirmation (%) | Not verified* | Not verified* | 100.00% |
| Histopathological Confirmation (%) |
Not verified* | Not verified* | 100.00% |
| PPV (%) | Not verified* | Not verified* | 100.00% (95% CI: 96.9–100.0) |
| NPV (%) | Not verified* | Not verified* | 100.00% (95% CI: 59.0–100.0) |
| SNR (mean ± SD) | 4.61 ± 1.10 | 4.22 ± 1.10 | 3.51 ± 1.20 |
| C-factor (mean ± SD) | 10.02 ± 2.00 | 10.20 ± 1.30 | 10.30 ± 1.22 |
| Sensitivity, BMI ≥30 (%) | 71.00% (66/93)* | 86.00% (80/93)* | 94.00% (87/93) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).