Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

From Abstract Theory to Practical Application: The Journey of Hilbert Space in Quantum Technologies

Submitted:

05 August 2025

Posted:

07 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Hilbert spaces provide the fundamental mathematical framework for describing quantum mechanical systems. Their structure, characterized by an inner product and completeness, allows for the representation of quantum states as vectors and physical observables as self-adjoint operators. Key quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement find natural expression within this formalism. Superposition, where a quantum system can exist in multiple states simultaneously, is represented by linear combinations of basis vectors in the Hilbert space. Entanglement, a non-classical correlation between quantum systems, is described by non-separable state vectors in a tensor product of Hilbert spaces. These concepts are pivotal in quantum computing, where the unit of information, the qubit, is a two-level quantum system whose state is a vector in a two-dimensional complex Hilbert space (ℂ²). Quantum gates, which perform operations on qubits, are represented by unitary operators acting on these state vectors. The power of quantum computation, particularly in algorithms like Shor's or Grover's, stems from the ability to exploit superposition and entanglement, processes intrinsically described within the Hilbert space framework. Thus, a thorough understanding of Hilbert spaces is indispensable for grasping the principles of quantum mechanics and for advancing the field of quantum information and computation [1, 7]. The transition from classical bits to quantum qubits, and from classical logic gates to quantum unitary operations, is entirely predicated on the mathematical properties endowed by Hilbert spaces.
Keywords: 
Hilbert space
;  
quantum computing
;  
qubit
;  
superposition
;  
entanglement
;  
unitary dynamics
;  
quantum mechanics
;  
functional analysis
;  
operator theory
;  
dirac notation
;  
quantum states
;  
linear operators
;  
quantum algorithms
;  
quantum information
Subject: 
Physical Sciences  -   Mathematical Physics

I. The Genesis and Development of Hilbert Space: From Abstract Functional Analysis to the Mathematical Bedrock of Quantum Mechanics

The concept of Hilbert space, now a cornerstone of modern mathematics and physics, particularly quantum mechanics, did not emerge fully formed. Its development was a gradual process, driven by the need to generalize familiar Euclidean geometry to infinite-dimensional spaces and to provide a rigorous framework for solving problems in areas such as integral equations and Fourier analysis. The journey from these early mathematical investigations to its indispensable role in quantum theory is a testament to the power of abstract mathematical structures in elucidating the physical world.
The intellectual seeds for Hilbert space were sown in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. David Hilbert’s seminal work on integral equations, notably his series of papers “Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen” (Foundations of a General Theory of Linear Integral Equations) published between 1904 and 1910, was a crucial catalyst [2]. While investigating these equations, Hilbert encountered and implicitly used many of the properties that would later define what we now call Hilbert spaces. He worked extensively with sequences of numbers (ℓ2) and functions (L2) for which the sum or integral of their squares is finite. Hilbert recognized the geometric analogies between these infinite-dimensional spaces and finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces, particularly the concept of orthogonality. His work introduced the idea of an infinite-dimensional analogue of an orthonormal basis and the spectral theory of operators, which would prove immensely important for quantum mechanics [1].
Contemporaneously, other mathematicians were making significant contributions. Erhard Schmidt, a student of Hilbert, formally introduced the geometric language and terminology, such as “orthogonal” and “norm,” in the context of function spaces. The work of Frigyes Riesz in 1907 [3] and Ernst Fischer, also in 1907, with the Riesz-Fischer theorem [4], established the crucial property of completeness for L2 spaces. This theorem demonstrated that L2 is a complete metric space, meaning that every Cauchy sequence of functions in L2 converges to a function also in L2. Completeness is a vital property, ensuring that the space does not have “holes” and that limiting processes, ubiquitous in analysis, are well-behaved. The abstract definition of a Hilbert space as a complete inner product space, independent of any specific realization like ℓ2 or L2, was gradually solidified through the work of several mathematicians, including John von Neumann, Marshall Stone [5], and Riesz himself.
The true significance of Hilbert space, however, transcended pure mathematics with the advent of quantum mechanics in the 1920s. The old quantum theory, while successful in explaining certain phenomena like the photoelectric effect and Bohr’s model of the atom, was ultimately incomplete and lacked a coherent mathematical foundation. The new quantum mechanics, developed by physicists like Werner Heisenberg [15], Erwin Schrödinger [14], Max Born [16,17], Paul Dirac [6], and Pascual Jordan [16,17], required a radically new mathematical framework.
Schrödinger’s wave mechanics initially described quantum states as wave functions, solutions to his famous wave equation. These wave functions were naturally elements of an L2 space. Simultaneously, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan developed matrix mechanics, where physical observables like position and momentum were represented by infinite matrices. It soon became apparent that these two seemingly different formulations were mathematically equivalent. It was John von Neumann who, in his groundbreaking book “Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik” (Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics) in 1932 [1], provided the definitive and rigorous mathematical framework for quantum mechanics by axiomatizing it in terms of Hilbert spaces.
Von Neumann recognized that the states of a quantum system could be represented by vectors (or more precisely, rays) in a Hilbert space, and physical observables (like energy, momentum, position) could be represented by self-adjoint (or Hermitian) operators acting on these vectors. The possible outcomes of a measurement of an observable correspond to the eigenvalues of the associated operator, and the probabilities of these outcomes are related to the inner products between the state vector and the corresponding eigenvectors. The discrete energy levels of atoms, for instance, emerged naturally as the discrete eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian operator. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, a stark departure from classical determinism, was elegantly incorporated through Born’s rule, which uses the squared norm of projections of state vectors onto eigenvectors.
Furthermore, the principle of superposition, a cornerstone of quantum theory stating that a quantum system can be in a combination of multiple states simultaneously, found a natural representation in the vector addition property of Hilbert spaces. If ψ1 and ψ2 are possible states, then any linear combination c1ψ1 + c2ψ2 (where c1 and c2 are complex numbers) is also a possible state. The dynamics of a quantum system, i.e., how its state progresses over time, is governed by the Schrödinger equation, which in the Hilbert space formalism corresponds to the temporal dynamics of the state vector under the action of a unitary operator derived from the Hamiltonian. Hermann Weyl’s work on group theory and quantum mechanics [18] further solidified the mathematical underpinnings, demonstrating how symmetries in physical systems could be represented by unitary representations of groups on Hilbert spaces, leading to profound insights into conservation laws and particle classification.
The introduction of Hilbert spaces thus provided not only a rigorous mathematical language for quantum mechanics but also a unifying framework that revealed the deep structural similarities between wave mechanics and matrix mechanics. It transformed quantum theory from a collection of somewhat ad-hoc rules into a coherent and mathematically sound physical theory. The abstract nature of Hilbert spaces allowed for generalizations beyond the initial L2 spaces, accommodating systems with intrinsic spin or other discrete degrees of freedom, which are described by finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. The concept of the tensor product of Hilbert spaces became essential for describing composite quantum systems and understanding phenomena like entanglement, which has no classical analogue [7].
In summary, the historical development of Hilbert space is a fascinating journey from investigations into infinite-dimensional linear algebra and analysis to becoming the very language of quantum reality. Its power lies in its ability to abstract the geometric intuition of Euclidean space to an infinite-dimensional setting while providing the analytical rigor needed for continuous phenomena. The synergy between mathematical abstraction and physical insight, so vividly demonstrated in the story of Hilbert space and quantum mechanics, continues to drive scientific discovery. The early pioneers, from Hilbert to von Neumann, laid a foundation that not only revolutionized physics but also spurred further developments in functional analysis itself [9,10,13].

II. The Expanding Reach of Hilbert Space: From Foundational Physics to Transformative Technologies and the Quantum Information Revolution

While Hilbert space was initially cemented as the mathematical language of quantum mechanics [1], its profound structural properties—completeness, an inner product inducing a norm and a notion of orthogonality, and the capacity to handle infinite dimensions—have propelled its application far beyond its original domain in fundamental physics. The abstract elegance and analytical power of Hilbert spaces have made them an indispensable tool in a diverse array of scientific and engineering disciplines, fostering innovation and enabling the development of transformative technologies. This expansion encompasses areas from classical signal processing and machine learning to the cutting edge of quantum information science and even touches upon foundational questions in quantum field theory and general relativity.
One of the earliest and most natural extensions of Hilbert space methods outside of quantum mechanics was in signal processing and communications theory. The space of square-integrable functions, L2(ℝ), a prototypical Hilbert space, provides the natural setting for analysing signals in terms of their energy content. The Fourier transform, which decomposes a signal into its constituent frequencies, is fundamentally a unitary transformation between L2 spaces (time domain and frequency domain), preserving the inner product (Parseval’s theorem/Plancherel’s theorem). This Hilbert space perspective underpins a vast range of techniques, including filter design, noise reduction, and data compression [23]. The development of wavelet theory, a powerful generalization of Fourier analysis that offers simultaneous time-frequency localization, is also deeply rooted in Hilbert space concepts, particularly the construction of orthonormal bases of wavelets [23]. These tools are critical in image processing, medical imaging (MRI, CT scans), and digital communications.
In the realm of machine learning and data science, Hilbert spaces, particularly Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS), have become central to a class of powerful algorithms [12,20]. Kernel methods, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs), kernel PCA, and Gaussian processes, implicitly map data into a high-dimensional (often infinite-dimensional) Hilbert space where linear patterns might be more easily discernible than in the original input space. The “kernel trick” allows computations to be performed in this feature space without explicitly carrying out the mapping, relying instead on the kernel function which computes inner products in the RKHS [20]. The theory of RKHS provides a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding generalization in machine learning and for designing new algorithms. The geometric structure of Hilbert spaces allows for notions like margins, distances, and projections, which are fundamental to the success of these learning techniques.
The influence of Hilbert space extends into mathematical economics and finance, particularly in the pricing of derivative securities and risk management. Stochastic processes, often modelled as progressing in Hilbert spaces of random variables, are used to describe the behavior of asset prices. For instance, the theory of martingales, which are crucial in no-arbitrage pricing, can be elegantly formulated within the L2 framework. Optimization problems in portfolio selection and risk minimization frequently involve minimizing norms or maximizing inner products in appropriately defined Hilbert spaces, although the direct application of abstract Hilbert space theory might be more prevalent in advanced theoretical models than in day-to-day practice [see, e.g., general stochastic finance texts like Föllmer & Schied for context, though direct Hilbert space treatises are specialized].
Returning to fundamental physics, beyond non-relativistic quantum mechanics, Hilbert spaces remain crucial, albeit with increased complexity. In Quantum Field Theory (QFT), which combines quantum mechanics with special relativity to describe elementary particles and their interactions, the state space is typically a Fock space. A Fock space is a direct sum of n-particle Hilbert spaces (symmetric or antisymmetric tensor products of single-particle Hilbert spaces), allowing for the creation (production, generation) and annihilation of particles [21,22]. While constructing interacting QFTs in a mathematically rigorous way (especially in 3+1 dimensions) remains a major challenge, the Hilbert space framework is an essential starting point for axiomatic approaches (like Wightman axioms [21]) and for perturbative calculations. The Haag-Kastler axioms, for instance, formulate QFT in terms of an algebra of local observables acting on a Hilbert space [22].
Even in General Relativity (GR), Einstein’s theory of gravitation, connections to Hilbert space, though less direct than in quantum theory, exist. Historically, David Hilbert himself independently derived the field equations of general relativity from an action principle almost simultaneously with Einstein, though his initial formulation was later refined [24]. More contemporary research in quantum gravity, which seeks to unify GR with quantum mechanics, often employs Hilbert space formalisms. Loop Quantum Gravity, for instance, uses a Hilbert space of spin network states to quantize spacetime geometry. String theory, another leading candidate for a theory of quantum gravity, also relies heavily on Hilbert space methods, particularly in the quantization of string vibrational modes and in the context of conformal field theories describing the string worldsheet.
The most transformative recent expansion of Hilbert space applications is undoubtedly in quantum information and quantum computing [7]. As discussed previously, the qubit, the fundamental unit of quantum information, is represented as a vector in a two-dimensional complex Hilbert space (ℂ2). Multi-qubit systems are described by vectors in the tensor product of these individual Hilbert spaces. Quantum algorithms, such as Shor’s algorithm for factoring and Grover’s algorithm for searching, derive their power from quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement, which are naturally described and manipulated within the Hilbert space formalism [7].
  • Superposition allows a qubit to exist in a combination of |0⟩ and |1⟩ states, effectively exploring multiple computational paths simultaneously. This is a direct consequence of the vector space structure of ℂ2.
  • Entanglement, where the state of a composite system cannot be described independently of its constituents, is represented by non-separable vectors in the tensor product Hilbert space. This uniquely quantum correlation is a key resource for quantum communication protocols like quantum teleportation and for achieving computational speedups.
  • Quantum gates, the building blocks of quantum circuits, are unitary operators acting on the state vectors in Hilbert space. Unitarity ensures that quantum dynamics are reversible and conserves probability.
  • Measurement in quantum computing involves projecting the state vector onto a basis, with probabilities determined by the squared magnitudes of the amplitudes (Born rule), a direct application of the inner product structure [1].
The development of quantum error correction codes, crucial for building fault-tolerant quantum computers, also relies heavily on identifying and manipulating specific subspaces within the larger Hilbert space of the quantum system. The very design of quantum algorithms often involves choreographing the dynamics of state vectors in Hilbert space to enhance the amplitudes of desired outcomes while destructively interfering unwanted ones.
Furthermore, the conceptual framework of Hilbert spaces has permeated other areas of physics and engineering where wave phenomena and linear systems are central. For example, in optics and photonics, the propagation of light and the behavior of optical modes can often be analysed using Hilbert space methods, particularly in quantum optics where light is treated as quantized fields. In acoustics and elasticity, modal analysis, which decomposes complex vibrations into simpler orthogonal modes, mirrors the eigenvalue problems encountered in Hilbert spaces.
In essence, the journey of Hilbert space from an abstract mathematical construct to a ubiquitous tool underscores a fundamental principle: powerful mathematical structures often find applications far beyond their initial conception. The geometric intuition (orthogonality, projection, distance) combined with the analytical power (completeness, spectral theory) offered by Hilbert spaces provides a versatile and robust language for modeling and solving complex problems across a vast scientific and technological landscape [9,10,13]. The ongoing quantum revolution, in particular, is inextricably linked to our ability to understand, manipulate, and engineer states and processes within the abstract confines of Hilbert space.

III. Core Pillars of Hilbert Space Theory: Definitions, Properties, and Interwoven Structures

A Hilbert space, denoted as mathcal{H} = H , is a fundamental mathematical structure that generalizes the concept of Euclidean space to potentially infinite dimensions while preserving key geometric and algebraic properties. Its precise definition and the rich interplay of its constituent concepts are crucial for understanding its vast applicability, especially in quantum mechanics and functional analysis [9,10]. This section elucidates these core concepts: the inner product, norm, completeness, orthogonality, basis expansions, linear operators, and the spectral theorem, highlighting their interconnections.
  • The Inner Product: Defining Geometry and Relations
At the heart of a Hilbert space lies the inner product (or scalar product). For a vector space H over the field of complex numbers ℂ (or real numbers ℝ, though complex Hilbert spaces are more common in quantum mechanics), an inner product is a function ⟨·, ·⟩: H × H → ℂ that satisfies the following properties for all vectors x, y, z ∈ H and all scalars α ∈ ℂ:
  • Conjugate Symmetry: ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨y, x⟩* (where * denotes complex conjugation). For real Hilbert spaces, this simplifies to symmetry: ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨y, x⟩.
  • Linearity in the first argument: ⟨αx + y, z⟩ = α⟨x, z⟩ + ⟨y, z⟩. (Note: Some conventions define linearity in the second argument; physics often uses linearity in the second argument for bra-ket notation consistency, ⟨ψ|αϕ1 + βϕ2⟩ = α⟨ψ|ϕ1⟩ + β⟨ψ|ϕ2⟩. Mathematically, it’s often in the first. Here, we follow the common mathematical convention of first-argument linearity, which implies sesquilinearity: ⟨x, αy + z⟩ = α*⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x, z⟩).
  • Positive-definiteness: ⟨x, x⟩ ≥ 0, and ⟨x, x⟩ = 0 if and only if x = 0 (the zero vector).
The inner product endows the vector space with a geometric structure. It allows for the definition of angles between vectors (via the cosine formula, generalized) and, most importantly, the concept of orthogonality: two vectors x and y are orthogonal if ⟨x, y⟩ = 0.
2.
The Norm: Measuring Length and Distance
The inner product naturally induces a norm on the Hilbert space, which quantifies the “length” or “magnitude” of a vector. The norm of a vector x, denoted ||x||, is defined as: ||x|| = √⟨x, x⟩
This induced norm satisfies the standard norm properties:
  • Non-negativity: ||x|| ≥ 0, and ||x|| = 0 if and only if x = 0.
  • Homogeneity: ||αx|| = |α| ||x|| for any scalar α.
  • Triangle Inequality: ||x + y|| ≤ ||x|| + ||y|| (this relies on the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality).
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, |⟨x, y⟩| ≤ ||x|| ||y||, is a fundamental result derived from the inner product properties and is crucial for proving the triangle inequality and many other analytical results [8,13]. The norm, in turn, defines a metric (distance function) d(x, y) = ||x - y||, making the Hilbert space a metric space. This allows for the discussion of convergence, continuity, and topological properties.
3.
Completeness: Ensuring No “Holes”
A critical defining feature of a Hilbert space is completeness with respect to the metric induced by its norm. A metric space is complete if every Cauchy sequence in the space converges to a limit that is also in the space. A Cauchy sequence {x_n} = xn is one where for any ε > 0, there exists an N such that ||xm - xn|| < ε for all m, n > N (i.e., terms eventually get arbitrarily close to each other).
Completeness is essential for analysis. It guarantees that limiting processes, which are fundamental to calculus, differential equations, and Fourier series, behave well. Without completeness, one might find sequences that “should” converge but whose limit lies outside the space. An inner product space that is complete with respect to its induced norm is, by definition, a Hilbert space [9]. Banach spaces are complete normed vector spaces; Hilbert spaces are special Banach spaces where the norm is derived from an inner product. Satisfying the parallelogram law:
||x + y||2 + ||x - y||2 = 2(||x||2 + ||y||2)
The Riesz-Fischer theorem [3,4] historically established the completeness of L2 spaces, a key example.
4.
Orthogonality and Orthonormal Bases: Decomposing Complexity
Orthogonality is a powerful concept in Hilbert spaces. A set of vectors {ei} is orthogonal if ⟨ei, ej⟩ = 0 for all i ≠ j. If, in addition, ||ei|| = 1 for all i, the set is orthonormal.
An orthonormal basis (ONB) for a Hilbert space H is a maximal orthonormal set. “Maximal” means that no non-zero vector in H is orthogonal to all vectors in the ONB. For separable Hilbert spaces (those possessing a countable dense subset, which includes most spaces encountered in quantum mechanics), an ONB is a countable set {e_i} = ei such that any vector x ∈ H can be uniquely expressed as a convergent series:
x = ∑i ⟨x, ei⟩ ei
The scalars ci = ⟨x, ei⟩ are the Fourier coefficients of x with respect to the basis. This expansion is analogous to decomposing a vector in Euclidean space into its components along orthogonal axes. Parseval’s identity holds: ||x||2 = ∑_i |⟨x, e_i⟩|2. The existence of an ONB is guaranteed for any non-zero Hilbert space (via Zorn’s lemma in the non-separable case, or Gram-Schmidt process for separable spaces). Examples include the standard basis vectors in ℂⁿ, or the set of complex exponentials
{e^(int)/√2π} in L2([0, 2π]) = {e (int)/√2π} in L2([0, 2π]).
5.
Linear Operators: Transformations and Observables
Linear operators (or linear transformations) A: D(A) ⊂ H1 → H2 map vectors from a domain D(A) in a Hilbert space H1 to another Hilbert space H2 (often H1 = H2 = H ), satisfying A(αx + βy) = αA(x) + βA(y).
  • Bounded Operators: An operator A is bounded if there exists a constant M ≥ 0 such that ||Ax|| ≤ M||x|| for all x ∈ D(A). The smallest such M is the operator norm ||A||. For linear operators defined on the entire Hilbert space, continuity is equivalent to boundedness.
  • Adjoint Operator: For a densely defined linear operator A on H, its adjoint A† (or A*) is defined by the relation ⟨Ax, y⟩ = ⟨x, A†y⟩ for all x ∈ D(A) and y ∈ D(A†). The existence and properties of the adjoint are central to operator theory.
  • Self-Adjoint (Hermitian) Operators: An operator A is self-adjoint if A = A† and D(A) = D(A†). In quantum mechanics, physical observables (like position, momentum, energy) are represented by self-adjoint operators [1,8]. Their eigenvalues are always real, corresponding to measurable quantities, and their eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal.
  • Unitary Operators: An operator U is unitary if U†U = UU† = I (the identity operator). Unitary operators preserve inner products (⟨Ux, Uy⟩ = ⟨x, y⟩), norms, and orthogonality. They represent symmetries and time development (via the Schrödinger equation, Zeitentwicklung (temporal dynamics: zaman gelişimi)) in quantum mechanics [6].
  • Projection Operators: A projection operator P is a self-adjoint operator such that P2 = P. It projects vectors onto a closed subspace of H.
6.
The Riesz Representation Theorem: Duality
The Riesz Representation Theorem is a cornerstone result connecting a Hilbert space with its continuous dual space H*. The dual space H* consists of all continuous linear functionals f: H → ℂ. The theorem states that for every continuous linear functional f on H, there exists a unique vector yf ∈ H such that f(x) = ⟨x, yf⟩ for all x ∈ H. Moreover, ||f|| = ||yf||. This establishes an isometric anti-linear isomorphism between H and H *, meaning that a Hilbert space is self-dual (up to conjugation). This is a unique property of Hilbert spaces not generally shared by Banach spaces. In Dirac’s bra-ket notation, kets |ψ⟩ are vectors in H, and bras ⟨φ| are elements of the dual space H *, representing functionals that act on kets to produce scalars: ⟨φ|(|ψ⟩) = ⟨φ|ψ⟩.
7.
The Spectral Theorem: Diagonalizing Self-Adjoint Operators
The Spectral Theorem is one of the most profound results in Hilbert space theory, providing a way to “diagonalize” self-adjoint operators, analogous to diagonalizing symmetric matrices in linear algebra [5,11]. For a self-adjoint operator A on a Hilbert space H:
  • Finite-dimensional case: If H is finite-dimensional, A has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors {ei} with corresponding real eigenvalues {λi}, such that A ei = λi ei. A can then be written as A = ∑i λi |ei⟩⟨ei| (using Dirac notation for the projection operator Pi = |ei⟩⟨ei|).
  • Infinite-dimensional case (compact operators): If A is a compact self-adjoint operator, there exists a (possibly finite) orthonormal sequence of eigenvectors {ei} with non-zero real eigenvalues {λi} such that λi → 0 if the sequence is infinite. Any vector x can be written as x = x0 + ∑i ⟨x, ei⟩ ei, where Ax0 = 0, and Ax = ∑i λi ⟨x, ei⟩ ei.
  • Infinite-dimensional case (general self-adjoint operators): For general (possibly unbounded) self-adjoint operators, the spectrum can be continuous. The spectral theorem states that A can be represented as an integral with respect to a projection-valued measure (PVM) E(λ): A = ∫_ℝ λ dE(λ) This means that for any suitable function f, f(A) = ∫_ℝ f(λ) dE(λ). The PVM {E(λ)} consists of projection operators onto subspaces corresponding to spectral values less than or equal to λ. This allows for a functional calculus for self-adjoint operators, crucial for defining functions of operators like e(itH/ħ) for temporal dynamics (Zeitentwicklung (time development: zaman gelişimi)) in quantum mechanics [1].
These fundamental concepts are deeply interconnected. The inner product defines the norm and orthogonality. Completeness, combined with the inner product structure, makes it a Hilbert space. Orthonormal bases allow for vector decomposition, simplifying the analysis of vectors and operators. Linear operators describe transformations, with self-adjoint and unitary operators playing pivotal roles in physical theories. The Riesz Representation Theorem establishes the self-duality, and the Spectral Theorem provides the powerful tool of operator diagonalization, which is indispensable for solving linear equations involving these operators and for understanding their physical meaning in quantum mechanics. The entire edifice of Hilbert space theory provides a robust and elegant framework for modern mathematics and physics [9,10,13].

IV. The Future of Hilbert Space and Interdisciplinary Synergies: Perspectives from New Mathematical Tools, Quantum Technologies, and Materials Science

The foundational role of Hilbert space in 20th-century physics and mathematics is undisputed [1,9]. However, its story is far from over. As we venture further into the 21st century, Hilbert space continues to be a vibrant and essential framework, developing in response to new challenges and opportunities across a spectrum of disciplines. The future of Hilbert space lies not only in refining its existing applications but also in its synergistic integration with emerging mathematical tools, the burgeoning field of quantum technologies, and the innovative domain of materials science. This convergence promises to unlock new scientific insights and drive technological breakthroughs.
  • Advanced Mathematical Structures and Hilbert Space Extensions
While classical Hilbert space theory is mature, its interaction with newer mathematical formalisms is an active area of research, leading to deeper understanding and novel applications.
  • Operator Algebras (C-algebras and von Neumann Algebras): These algebras, which are sets of operators on a Hilbert space closed under certain algebraic and topological conditions, provide a powerful abstract framework for quantum mechanics and quantum field theory [22]. The theory of von Neumann algebras, pioneered by von Neumann himself and Francis Murray, is particularly crucial for understanding different “types” of quantum systems and for the rigorous formulation of QFT. C*-algebras offer a more general setting, useful in quantum statistical mechanics and in defining quantum systems without necessarily presupposing an underlying Hilbert space (though the GNS construction can recover one). Future developments in these areas, particularly in classifying and understanding the structure of these algebras, will likely yield new perspectives on entanglement, quantum phases of matter, and the nature of quantum information.
  • Noncommutative Geometry: Spearheaded by Alain Connes, noncommutative geometry generalizes traditional differential geometry to spaces whose “coordinate functions” do not commute [see, e.g., Connes, A. (1994). Noncommutative Geometry] [138]]. This framework naturally incorporates operator algebras acting on Hilbert spaces. It has found applications in areas like the Standard Model of particle physics, the quantum Hall effect, and even number theory. The interplay between noncommutative geometric structures and Hilbert space representations could provide novel tools for tackling problems in quantum gravity and understanding spacetime at the Planck scale.
  • Topological Quantum Field Theories (TQFTs): TQFTs are quantum field theories whose correlation functions are topological invariants. They have deep connections to knot theory, low-dimensional topology, and condensed matter physics (e.g., fractional quantum Hall effect, topological insulators [26]). The state spaces in TQFTs are often finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and the time-progression operators are related to topological operations. The mathematical structure of TQFTs, often described using category theory and tensor categories, enriches our understanding of how Hilbert spaces can encode topological information. This is particularly relevant for fault-tolerant quantum computation, where topological qubits based on non-Abelian anyons are a promising avenue [25]. Hilbert spaces in this context are protected by topology, making them robust against local perturbations.
  • Random Matrix Theory (RMT) and Free Probability: RMT studies the statistical properties of eigenvalues of large random matrices. It has found surprising applications in nuclear physics, quantum chaos, number theory (Riemann zeta function), and even finance. The connection to Hilbert spaces arises when considering random operators. Voiculescu’s free probability theory, an analogue of classical probability for non-commuting variables, is intimately linked with von Neumann algebras and RMT, providing new tools to analyse spectra of operators on Hilbert spaces. These tools are becoming increasingly important in understanding complex quantum systems and disordered systems.
2.
Quantum Technologies: Hilbert Space as the Engineering Playground
The quantum technology revolution, encompassing quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing, is fundamentally built upon the principles of quantum mechanics, and thus, on Hilbert spaces [7].
  • Scalable Quantum Computing: The primary challenge in quantum computing is building large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers. Current “Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum” (NISQ) devices [27] operate with a few tens to hundreds of qubits, whose states are vectors in Hilbert spaces of dimension 2^N (for N qubits). Future progress depends on:
    ▪
    Improved Qubit Quality and Connectivity: Engineering physical qubits (superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photons, etc.) that better approximate ideal two-level systems in their Hilbert space and minimizing decoherence (loss of quantum information due to interaction with the environment).
    ▪
    Advanced Quantum Error Correction (QEC): QEC codes, like surface codes or LDPC codes, encode logical qubits into many physical qubits, constructing protected subspaces within the larger Hilbert space. The design and analysis of these codes are exercises in Hilbert space geometry and operator theory. Topological QEC [25] offers inherent fault tolerance by leveraging non-local degrees of freedom in specially designed Hilbert spaces.
    ▪
    Novel Quantum Algorithms: While Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms are landmarks, the search for new quantum algorithms that offer speedups for other relevant problems (e.g., optimization, machine learning, simulation) continues. This often involves ingenious manipulation of state vectors and unitary operations within vast Hilbert spaces.
  • Quantum Machine Learning (QML): The intersection of quantum computing and machine learning aims to leverage Hilbert space properties like superposition and entanglement for faster or more powerful learning algorithms [12,20,28]. Quantum kernels can map classical data into quantum Hilbert spaces, potentially revealing complex patterns. Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) use parameterized quantum circuits (unitary operations on Hilbert spaces) optimized via classical feedback loops to solve machine learning tasks or find ground states of quantum systems [28]. The expressive power of these quantum models, related to the geometry of the accessible Hilbert space regions, is an active research area.
  • Quantum Simulation: Simulating complex quantum systems (e.g., molecules, materials, high-energy physics) is often intractable for classical computers due to the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension. Quantum computers, being quantum systems themselves, are naturally suited for this task [19]. Simulating the dynamics e(-iHt) of a quantum system governed by Hamiltonian H involves implementing unitary operations on the Hilbert space of the simulator. This has profound implications for drug discovery, materials design, and fundamental physics.
  • Quantum Communication and Cryptography: Protocols like quantum key distribution (QKD) rely on the properties of quantum states in Hilbert spaces (e.g., no-cloning theorem, measurement disturbance) to ensure secure communication. The development of a “quantum internet” would involve entanglement distribution across networks of quantum devices, requiring sophisticated control and manipulation of entangled states in high-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
3.
Materials Science: Hilbert Space as a Design and Discovery Tool
Hilbert space methods are becoming increasingly integral to understanding, designing, and discovering new materials with exotic quantum properties.
  • Topological Materials: Materials like topological insulators, topological superconductors, and Weyl semimetals exhibit unique electronic properties dictated by the topology of their electronic band structures in momentum space [26]. The wavefunctions of electrons in these materials live in Hilbert spaces, and their topological characteristics (e.g., Chern numbers, Z2 invariants) are derived from the behavior of these wavefunctions and associated Hamiltonians. These materials hold promise for spintronics, quantum computing (e.g., Majorana-based qubits), and low-power electronics. Understanding their behavior often requires sophisticated Hilbert space analysis of effective Hamiltonians.
  • Strongly Correlated Electron Systems: In many materials, electron-electron interactions are too strong to be treated perturbatively. This leads to emergent phenomena like high-temperature superconductivity, colossal magnetoresistance, and Mott insulators. Describing the many-body Hilbert space of these systems is extremely challenging. Techniques like Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (DMFT), Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG), and tensor network methods aim to find effective descriptions or tractable approximations within these vast Hilbert spaces. Machine learning techniques are also being applied to find patterns or solutions within these Hilbert spaces [28].
  • Computational Materials Design: First-principles calculations, such as Density Functional Theory (DFT), solve effective single-particle Schrödinger-like (Kohn-Sham) equations, where the wavefunctions (orbitals) are elements of L2 spaces. These methods allow for the prediction of material properties (electronic, optical, magnetic, structural) from fundamental quantum mechanics, guiding the experimental synthesis of new materials. While DFT has limitations, especially for strongly correlated systems, its Hilbert space foundation is clear. Future advancements may involve integrating more sophisticated many-body Hilbert space techniques with DFT.
  • Quantum Metamaterials and Photonics: Designing artificial materials (metamaterials) with tailored electromagnetic or photonic responses often involves engineering the Hilbert space of light-matter interactions. Photonic crystals, for instance, generate “bandgaps” for photons analogous to electronic bandgaps in solids, controlling light propagation in unprecedented ways. The Hilbert space of photonic modes and their interaction with quantum emitters (e.g., quantum dots in cavities) is central to quantum photonics and on-chip quantum information processing.
The future trajectory of Hilbert space is one of increasing interdisciplinarity. The abstract power of its mathematical framework, combined with the concrete challenges and opportunities in quantum technologies and materials science, generates a fertile ground for innovation. New mathematical insights into the structure of Hilbert spaces and operators will inform the development of more powerful quantum algorithms and more robust quantum devices. Conversely, the physical constraints and desired functionalities of quantum systems and novel materials will pose new mathematical questions, driving further advancement in Hilbert space theory itself [8,11]. This symbiotic relationship ensures that Hilbert space will remain a central concept in scientific discovery and technological advancement for the foreseeable future.

V. Projecting the Trajectory: Hilbert Space in the Next Decade – Anticipated Advances and Interdisciplinary Reverberations

The enduring utility of Hilbert space, transitioning from a purely mathematical abstraction to an indispensable tool in physics and engineering, positions it centrally for future scientific and technological advancements. The next decade is poised to witness an accelerated progression, driven by the confluence of more sophisticated quantum hardware, novel algorithmic insights, breakthroughs in materials science, and the increasing integration of artificial intelligence and advanced computational tools. These developments will not only deepen our understanding of Hilbert space itself but also significantly broaden its impact across diverse disciplines.
  • Maturation of Quantum Technologies and Hilbert Space Engineering
The “second quantum revolution” [41] is well underway, and Hilbert space is its primary operational arena.
  • Beyond NISQ and Towards Fault Tolerance: While current quantum computers are in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era [27], the coming decade will see significant strides towards fault-tolerant quantum computation. This involves engineering larger Hilbert spaces with better qubit coherence and connectivity, alongside the practical implementation of more efficient quantum error correction (QEC) codes [7]. The exploration of topological QEC, potentially utilizing exotic quasiparticles like Majorana fermions [61] in nanomaterials [38] or anyons in topological phases of matter [25], represents a sophisticated form of Hilbert space engineering where quantum information is non-locally encoded and protected. Research into novel material systems, such as nodal-line semimetals [30,58,59,60] and Weyl semimetals [31,61,62,63,64], which host unique electronic states governed by topological principles, could provide new platforms for robust qubits whose Hilbert space structure inherently offers advantages for quantum information processing.
  • Quantum Simulation at Scale: Quantum computers promise to revolutionize the simulation of complex quantum systems [19]. In the next decade, we anticipate simulations of molecules and materials with a level of accuracy and scale previously unattainable. This will involve mapping the Hilbert space of the target system onto the Hilbert space of the quantum simulator and transforming the state using precisely controlled unitary operations. This capability will have profound implications for drug discovery, catalysis, and materials design, potentially accelerating the discovery of materials with desired properties, such as those for optoelectronic applications [50] or understanding complex phenomena in condensed matter [53,54]. The challenge of comparing quantum simulation outputs with theoretical model predictions, particularly in complex biological or medical contexts, will also spur new research, as highlighted by Domuschiev (2025) [46].
  • Quantum-Enhanced Sensing and Metrology: Hilbert space-based quantum states (e.g., squeezed states, entangled states) can enable sensors with sensitivities surpassing classical limits. The next decade will likely see the deployment of quantum sensors in diverse fields, from medical diagnostics (e.g., enhanced MRI using hyperpolarized nuclei) to navigation and fundamental physics tests. The development of advanced sensor technologies, such as those based on the planar Hall effect [56] or magnetic resonance [52], will continue to benefit from a deep understanding of how to manipulate and read out quantum states in their respective Hilbert spaces.
2.
Algorithmic Innovation and Computational Frontiers
The interplay between Hilbert space structure and computational algorithms will continue to be a rich source of innovation.
  • Novel Mathematical Tools and Algorithms: The search for new mathematical structures and their applications is ongoing. For instance, explorations in number theory, such as those involving “Keçeci numbers” [36,37,68,69,70], or reinterpretations of fundamental mathematical concepts like binomial expansions (“Keçeci Binomial Square” [32,33,65,66]), while perhaps not directly Hilbert space theory, reflect the broader trend of seeking novel mathematical tools that could eventually find applications in areas underpinned by Hilbert spaces, such as signal processing or quantum information theory. Similarly, developments in areas like fixed point theory in quasimetric spaces [55] or the study of nonlinear parabolic equations [45] contribute to the broader mathematical toolkit that can be applied to problems arising in physical systems described by Hilbert spaces. The exploration of fractal geometries, such as the “Keçeci Circle Fractal” [34,35,67], might also offer new ways to conceptualize complex systems or design structures with unique Hilbert space properties, potentially relevant for metamaterials or antenna design. The development of specific computational tools and layouts, such as “Kececilayout” [39,40,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] or “Grikod” [43,44,81,82], and visualization tools like “SciencePlots” [57], further facilitate research and discovery by enabling more efficient data handling and presentation in these complex domains.
  • AI and Machine Learning Synergy: The synergy between AI/machine learning and Hilbert space methods will deepen. Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to analyze data from quantum experiments, optimize quantum control protocols, and even discover new quantum algorithms or physical insights [28]. Conversely, quantum machine learning [7,20] aims to leverage the vastness of Hilbert spaces to achieve computational advantages. In the next decade, we expect more sophisticated QML algorithms and clearer demonstrations of quantum advantage for specific machine learning tasks, potentially impacting fields from finance to scientific discovery.
  • Computational Physics and Materials Science: First-principles calculations based on Density Functional Theory (DFT), which operate within the L2 Hilbert space framework, will become more powerful and predictive [53]. These methods are crucial for understanding and designing new materials, including those with complex magnetic configurations [48] or magnetodielectric effects [49]. The study of exotic states of matter, such as the X(3872) particle using QCD sum rules [51], or the behaviour of fermions in curved or magnetized spacetimes [54], relies heavily on sophisticated applications of quantum field theory and Hilbert space techniques. Furthermore, understanding geometric and topological aspects in condensed matter systems, such as quadrupoles of disclinations [47], involves rich Hilbert space descriptions. Theoretical investigations into instanton-like solutions in higher-dimensional models, as explored by Keçeci (2011) [42], also contribute to the broader understanding of field theories that are ultimately defined over Hilbert spaces.
3.
Interdisciplinary Breakthroughs Driven by Hilbert Space Perspectives
The abstract nature of Hilbert space allows its concepts to permeate and connect seemingly disparate fields.
  • Bridging Quantum Physics and Cosmology/Gravitation: While a full theory of quantum gravity remains elusive, Hilbert space formalisms are central to candidate theories like string theory and loop quantum gravity. The next decade may see experimental or observational hints that guide these theoretical endeavours, potentially involving cosmological observations or high-energy physics experiments. The interface of quantum field theory in curved spacetimes, where Hilbert space constructions become significantly more complex (e.g., dealing with particle production and the Unruh effect), will continue to be an active research area [54].
  • Complex Systems and Network Science: The mathematical tools of Hilbert space, particularly spectral graph theory (analysing eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices associated with graphs), find applications in understanding the structure and dynamics of complex networks, from social networks to biological interaction networks and technological infrastructures.
  • Fundamental Mathematical Exploration: The inherent structure of Hilbert spaces continues to inspire purely mathematical research. Questions regarding operator theory, spectral theory for non-self-adjoint operators, the geometry of infinite-dimensional spaces, and connections to other mathematical areas like number theory or topology, will drive mathematical advancements [8,9,10].
The next decade promises to be a period of significant advancement where the principles of Hilbert space are not just applied but actively engineered and manipulated with increasing sophistication. The ripple effects will be felt across science and technology, from the most fundamental inquiries into the nature of reality to the development of transformative technologies that reshape our world. The ongoing dialogue between theoretical understanding, experimental capability, and computational power, all revolving around the versatile framework of Hilbert space, will be key to unlocking these future breakthroughs. The increasing availability of open-source tools and pre-print archives accelerates this process, fostering a more collaborative and dynamic research environment [33,35,37,40,43,44,46,47,57]. Contemporary challenges in advanced technological applications often require interdisciplinary approaches and sophisticated experimental methodologies. In this context, the statistical methods employed [83], such as design of experiments (DOE), Taguchi optimization, and response surface methodology—used to achieve minimum clad size in a laser-assisted metal deposition process—bear significant methodological resemblance to studies aiming to model and optimize highly sensitive physical systems, such as quantum computing architectures or gravitational wave observatories. In both domains, the systematic analysis of multiple variables is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes and enabling automation in real-world applications. Therefore, the successful adaptation of such methodologies across different engineering fields highlights the importance of interdisciplinary scientific synthesis [84,85].
4.
Algorithmic Innovation and Computational Frontiers
  • Computational Physics and Materials Science: Exploring Topological Phases and Hilbert Space Manifestations
First-principles calculations, predominantly Density Functional Theory (DFT) operating within the L2 Hilbert space framework, continue to be indispensable for predicting and understanding the properties of novel materials. This is particularly true for the burgeoning field of topological materials, which exhibit exotic electronic states governed by the symmetries and topology of their Hilbert spaces of electronic wavefunctions.
  • Methodological Parallels in Material Discovery: The Case of Nodal-Line Semimetals
The search for and characterization of materials like nodal-line semimetals (NLSMs) [30,58,59,60], which feature band crossings that form closed loops in momentum space, heavily rely on such computational foresight. While direct studies of NLSMs are paramount, the methodological approaches used in broader computational materials science provide crucial groundwork. For instance, the work by Bidai et al. (2020) [53], investigating carbon substitution in MgSiP2 chalcopyrite using DFT with the TB-mBJ approximation, strikingly illustrates this trend. Their detailed analysis of how band gaps can be tuned and optical absorption enhanced, although not on an NLSM, exemplifies the precise ab initio calculations and band structure engineering techniques that are fundamental to theoretically screening NLSM candidates. Such studies [53] demonstrate the power of Hilbert space-based DFT in predicting electronic properties and optimizing material characteristics, offering a valuable foundation for discovering and understanding more exotic topological materials like NLSMs and Weyl semimetals [31,61,62,63,64]. The ability to meticulously model the Hilbert space of electrons and predict how it changes with composition or strain is key.
The behaviour of fermions in unique environments, even those not directly NLSMs, can also offer insights into the types of phenomena that might be engineered or observed in topological systems. The study by Mustafa and Güvendi (2025) [54] on fermions in a (2+1)-dimensional magnetized spacetime with a cosmological constant explores how such backgrounds can lead to impenetrable magnetic domain walls and spinning magnetic vortices for Dirac-Weyl fermions. While the context is gravitational and involves nonlinear electrodynamics, the mathematical treatment of fermionic states within a Schrödinger-like equation derived from a relativistic framework showcases the sophisticated manipulation of Hilbert space concepts. The emergence of confined states or specific topological modes, even in such an abstract setting, can inspire thinking about how to realize analogous robust states in condensed matter systems, potentially including those based on the unique band structures of NLSMs where Berry curvature and topological invariants in the Hilbert space play a critical role.
The underlying mathematical formalisms that ensure the robustness of computational methods or describe abstract properties are also relevant. While not directly about materials, developments in areas such as fixed-point theory within quasimetric spaces, as explored by Altun et al. (2023) [55], contribute to the foundational mathematical tools that underpin numerical stability and convergence proofs for algorithms used in complex simulations, including those employed in materials physics. The Q-functions and properties they introduce [55] are part of a broader mathematical landscape that ensures the reliability of computational predictions of, for example, band structures in potential NLSM candidates.
Furthermore, the eventual application of topological materials like NLSMs often involves integrating them into devices where their unique electronic properties can be exploited. This necessitates understanding and engineering their response to external fields or their behaviour in heterostructures. Advanced sensor technologies, such as planar Hall effect (PHE) sensors, are a prime example. The review by Elzwawy et al. (2021) [56] on PHE sensors details their development, optimization (including material choice and junction configuration), and diverse applications. While PHE is a general spintronic phenomenon, materials with strong spin-orbit coupling and unique Fermi surface topologies, characteristic of many topological materials including potentially some NLSMs, could offer new avenues for enhancing PHE sensor performance. Understanding how the specific Hilbert space structure of an NLSM’s charge carriers interacts with magnetic fields to produce transport anomalies is a rich area for future research, potentially leading to novel sensor designs highlighted by such reviews [56].
The exploration of NLSMs [30,58,59,60], therefore, benefits from a wide ecosystem of computational techniques, theoretical models of fermionic behaviour in constrained Hilbert spaces, foundational mathematical results, and an eye towards device applications where their topological properties [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,131,132] can be leveraged. Hilbert space remains the unifying language connecting these diverse research threads.

VI. The Enduring Relevance of Hilbert Space: Illuminating the Path of Scientific Discovery and Technological Innovation

The journey through the conceptual landscape and advancing applications of Hilbert space reveals a remarkable narrative of mathematical abstraction empowering profound physical insight and technological progress. From its genesis in the efforts to generalize Euclidean geometry and solve integral equations [2,3,4], Hilbert space rapidly transformed into the indispensable mathematical bedrock of quantum mechanics [1,6], providing a rigorous and elegant language to describe the counterintuitive phenomena of the quantum realm. Its influence, however, did not remain confined to fundamental physics. As we have explored, the structural richness of Hilbert spaces—their completeness, inner product, notion of orthogonality, and capacity to handle infinite dimensions—has propelled their adoption across a vast spectrum of scientific and engineering disciplines [9,10,13].
The historical trajectory, from Hilbert’s foundational work through von Neumann’s axiomatization of quantum theory [1] to the modern era of quantum information science [7], underscores a recurring theme: the predictive and descriptive power of well-chosen mathematical structures. Hilbert space provided the framework not only to unify wave mechanics and matrix mechanics but also to predict and understand phenomena like superposition, entanglement, and quantum tunneling, which have no classical counterparts and are now being harnessed for transformative technologies like quantum computing [7,19,27] and quantum communication. The spectral theorem [5,11], a crowning achievement of Hilbert space theory, offers a profound understanding of observables and their measurement, forming the linchpin of quantum mechanical predictions.
Looking towards the future, as discussed in the preceding sections, the role of Hilbert space is set to expand further. The burgeoning field of quantum technologies relies entirely on our ability to manipulate and understand quantum states as vectors in increasingly complex Hilbert spaces. The quest for fault-tolerant quantum computers is, in essence, a grand challenge in Hilbert space engineering—designing and controlling vast state spaces while mitigating the detrimental effects of decoherence [25,38]. Similarly, the design and discovery of novel quantum materials, such as topological insulators [26] or Weyl and nodal-line semimetals [30,31,58,59,60], heavily depend on analysing the Hilbert spaces of electronic wavefunctions and their associated Hamiltonians, often aided by sophisticated computational methods [53,54]. The synergy with artificial intelligence and machine learning [20,28] promises new avenues for navigating these complex Hilbert spaces, potentially accelerating discovery in both fundamental science and applied technology.
The interdisciplinary reach of Hilbert space is a testament to its fundamental nature. Its concepts resonate in signal processing [23], where Fourier and wavelet analysis are intrinsically Hilbert space operations; in machine learning [12], through kernel methods and RKHS; and even in areas of pure mathematics like operator algebras [22] and noncommutative geometry, which continue to draw inspiration from and contribute back to Hilbert space theory. The development of new mathematical tools and computational software [e.g., 32-37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 57] further empowers researchers to explore and exploit the properties of these abstract spaces in increasingly sophisticated ways.
However, the journey is ongoing, and challenges remain. In fundamental physics, reconciling quantum mechanics (and thus Hilbert space) with general relativity to achieve a theory of quantum gravity is one of the greatest unsolved problems. While Hilbert space is a common feature in candidate theories, its precise role and interpretation in a quantum theory of spacetime are still debated. In quantum computing, scaling up to millions of high-quality qubits and implementing robust error correction are formidable engineering hurdles. In materials science, predicting and synthesizing materials with precisely tailored quantum properties requires even more powerful theoretical and computational tools to navigate the exponentially large Hilbert spaces of many-body systems.
Despite these challenges, the overarching narrative is one of optimism and continuous progress. The foundational concepts of Hilbert space, developed over a century ago, remain as relevant and potent as ever. They provide a common language and a robust toolkit for scientists and engineers across diverse fields, fostering collaboration and enabling the cross-pollination of ideas. The ongoing exploration of Hilbert space and its applications is not merely an academic exercise; it is a vital component of humanity’s quest to understand the universe at its most fundamental level and to harness that understanding for societal benefit.
In conclusion, Hilbert space stands as a monumental achievement of 20th-century mathematics and physics, whose impact will undoubtedly continue to reverberate throughout the 21st century and beyond. Its elegant fusion of geometry and analysis provides a versatile and powerful framework for modelling a vast array of phenomena. As new scientific questions emerge and technological frontiers expand, the principles and structures of Hilbert space will continue to illuminate the path of discovery, driving innovation and deepening our comprehension of the complex, interconnected world we inhabit. The horizons of Hilbert space are not fixed; they are constantly expanding, pushed outward by the relentless curiosity and ingenuity of the scientific community.

VII. The Relationship Between the Inner Product, Hilbert Spaces, and Generalized Inner Product Spaces (GIPS

The statement, “At the heart of a Hilbert space lies the inner product (or scalar product),” emphasizes that the inner product is the foundational element of this mathematical structure. The inner product is an operation that endows a vector space with a geometric structure, allowing us to define concepts such as length, angle, and orthogonality. When an inner product space is also complete—meaning that every Cauchy sequence within it converges—it is called a Hilbert space. This property of completeness is crucial for performing analysis, especially in infinite-dimensional spaces.
Fundamental Properties of the Inner Product:
The inner product in a Hilbert space, typically denoted as <x, y>, satisfies the following core properties:
  • Linearity: It is linear in its first argument.
  • Conjugate Symmetry: The complex conjugate of <x, y> is equal to <y, x>.
  • Positive-definiteness: The inner product of a vector with itself is always a positive real number, and the inner product of the zero vector with itself is zero.
Thanks to these properties, the inner product allows us to extend the fundamental intuitions of Euclidean geometry to abstract and infinite-dimensional spaces.

Generalized Inner Product Spaces (GIPS)

Generalized Inner Product Spaces (GIPS) represent a broader concept that arises from relaxing or modifying one or more properties of the standard inner product. This generalization can occur in several ways:
  • Removal of Positive-Definiteness: The positive-definite requirement of a standard inner product may not always be enforced. Cases where this condition is not met are referred to as “indefinite inner products,” and such spaces are used in fields like general relativity.
  • n-Inner Product Spaces: In this generalization, the inner product is defined on n vectors instead of two. Such a “generalized n-inner product” examines more complex geometric relationships, such as the linear independence of vectors.

The Relationship: Generalization and Inclusion

The relationship between the inner product and Generalized Inner Product Spaces is one of generalization. The standard inner product in a Hilbert space is a very specific and fundamental example of a Generalized Inner Product Space.
  • Every Hilbert space is an inner product space.
  • Every inner product space can be considered a subset of Generalized Inner Product Spaces that satisfies certain conditions (such as positive-definiteness and being limited to two vectors).
In summary, the statement “At the heart of a Hilbert space lies the inner product” signifies that this structure forms its geometric foundation. Generalized Inner Product Spaces take this fundamental concept and extend it by relaxing some of its rules, thereby providing a broader theoretical framework. This allows mathematicians and physicists to work with more diverse and complex structures.
The study by Noorwali et al. (2025) [130] presents a significant advancement in the field of fixed-point theory, serving as a compelling example of how theoretical mathematics can illuminate contemporary technological problems. Noorwali et al. (2025) [130] make a notable contribution to the existing literature by extending fixed-point theorems for triple self-mappings from standard Hilbert spaces to the broader class of Generalized Inner Product Spaces (GIPS). The authors’ generalized analysis on the existence and uniqueness of common fixed points, achieved by relaxing contraction conditions, opens new avenues for the study of multi-operator systems. Perhaps the most striking aspect of the paper is its successful application of these abstract mathematical findings to highly current and practical domains, such as the convergence analysis of Deep Equilibrium Models (DEMs) and the design of lattice-based protocols for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQP). In this regard, the work stands out as an innovative piece that strengthens the bridge between functional analysis, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity [130].

VIII. Interrogating the Conceptual Link Between Keçeci Numbers and Hilbert Space

What Is a Hilbert Space?

In mathematics, a Hilbert space is a generalisation of the concept of Euclidean space. Fundamentally, it is a vector space with the following properties:
  • Inner Product: It possesses an operation that allows for the definition of geometric concepts such as length (norm) and angle between two vectors.
  • Completeness: This means that the limit of every “convergent” sequence in the space also resides within that space. This guarantees that there are no “gaps” in the space.
It is a fundamental tool in many fields, such as quantum mechanics, signal processing, and functional analysis.

The Conceptual Link Between Keçeci Numbers and Hilbert Space

The relationship stems not from the Keçeci Numbers [36,37,68,69,70,131,132,133,134,135,136,137] themselves, but rather from the nature of the mathematical spaces in which these number sequences “live”. An indirect and conceptual link can be established between some of the number systems in which Keçeci Numbers are defined and Hilbert spaces.
  • Complex Numbers: Keçeci numbers can be generated within the set of complex numbers. The complex plane (ℂ) is, in itself, a fundamental Hilbert space. The “Trajectory in Complex Plane” graph, generated for complex numbers by the plot_numbers function within the Kececinumbers module code [36,37,68,69,70], visualises the path traced by a point (vector) along the sequence in this plane, which is itself a Hilbert space.
  • Quaternions: Quaternions (ℍ) form a 4-dimensional vector space and can be structured as a Hilbert space with the standard inner product. When the Keçeci numbers algorithm generates a quaternion sequence, this sequence can be analysed as a trajectory in a 4-dimensional Hilbert space. The fact that the Kececinumbers module code calculates and plots the magnitude of the quaternions is a direct application of the concept of the “norm” in Hilbert spaces.
  • Other Multi-dimensional Spaces:
    o 
    Hyperreal Numbers: As defined in the code, the HyperrealNumber class is represented as a sequence of real numbers. This structure is, in fact, an element of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space (ℝⁿ), and every finite-dimensional Euclidean space is a Hilbert space.
    o 
    Bicomplex Numbers: As these numbers are also multi-component, their behaviour is studied in multi-dimensional spaces, and these spaces can possess the structure of a Hilbert space with an appropriate inner product.

In Summary

The Keçeci Numbers algorithm does not directly use Hilbert space theory. However, many of the number systems to which the algorithm is applied (such as complex numbers, quaternions, etc.) naturally possess the structure of a Hilbert space.
Therefore, the relationship can be summarised as follows:
  • No Direct Relationship: Knowledge of Hilbert space is not essential for understanding the Keçeci Conjecture or the number generators.
  • Indirect and Structural Relationship: The sequences of Keçeci numbers can be interpreted as the trajectory of vectors whose elements belong to a Hilbert space. This perspective offers the potential to use the powerful geometric and analytical tools of Hilbert spaces (e.g., norm, inner product, projection) to analyse the dynamic behaviours of the sequence, such as convergence, periodicity, and “attractors”.

References

  1. Von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer. (English translation: (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press. [CrossRef]
  2. Hilbert, D. (1906). Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen. (Erste Mitteilung). Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 1904, 49-91. (Collected work: Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Theorie der linearen Integralgleichungen. (1912). Teubner.).
  3. Riesz, F. (1907). Sur les systèmes orthogonaux de fonctions. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 144, 615-619.
  4. Fischer, E. (1907). Sur la convergence en moyenne. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 144, 1022-1024.
  5. Stone, M. H. (1932). Linear Transformations in Hilbert Space and Their Applications to Analysis. American Mathematical Society. [CrossRef]
  6. Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
  7. Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  8. Hall, B. C. (2013). Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Springer. [CrossRef]
  9. Reed, M., & Simon, B. (1980). Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. 1: Functional Analysis. Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0125850506.
  10. Akhiezer, N. I., & Glazman, I. M. (1993). Theory of Linear Operators in Hilbert Space. Dover Publications.
  11. Teschl, G. (2009). Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics: With Applications to Schrödinger Operators. American Mathematical Society. [CrossRef]
  12. Aronszajn, N. (1950). Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68(3), 337-404. [CrossRef]
  13. Halmos, P. R. (1951). Introduction to Hilbert Space and the Theory of Spectral Multiplicity. Chelsea Publishing Company.
  14. Schrödinger, E. (1926). An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Physical Review, 28(6), 1049-1070. [CrossRef]
  15. Heisenberg, W. (1925). Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Physik, 33(1), 879-893. [CrossRef]
  16. Born, M., & Jordan, P. (1925). Zur Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 34(1), 858-888. [CrossRef]
  17. Born, M., Heisenberg, W., & Jordan, P. (1926). Zur Quantenmechanik II. Zeitschrift für Physik, 35(8-9), 557-615. [CrossRef]
  18. Weyl, H. (1928). Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik. S. Hirzel. (English translation: (1931). The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. Methuen & Co.).
  19. Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6/7), 467-488. [CrossRef]
  20. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press. [CrossRef]
  21. Streater, R. F., & Wightman, A. S. (1989). PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070629.
  22. Haag, R. (1996). Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras (2nd ed.). Springer. [CrossRef]
  23. Mallat, S. (2009). A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way (3rd ed.). Academic Press. [CrossRef]
  24. Hilbert, D. (1915). Die Grundlagen der Physik. (Erste Mitteilung). Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 1915, 395-407.
  25. Kitaev, A. Y. (2003). Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics, 303(1), 2-30. [CrossRef]
  26. Hasan, M. Z., & Kane, C. L. (2010). Colloquium: Topological insulators. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(4), 3045-3067. [CrossRef]
  27. Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79. [CrossRef]
  28. Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017). Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science, 355(6325), 602-606. [CrossRef]
  29. Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., ... & Martinis, J. M. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779), 505-510. [CrossRef]
  30. Keçeci, M. (2025). Nodal-line semimetals: A geometric advantage in quantum information. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  31. Keçeci, M. (2025). Weyl semimetals: Discovery of exotic electronic states and topological phases. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  32. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 15). The Keçeci binomial square: A reinterpretation of the standard binomial expansion and its potential applications. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  33. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 14). Kececisquares. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  34. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 13). Scalable complexity: Mathematical analysis and potential for physical applications of the Keçeci circle fractal. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  35. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 13). Kececifractals. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  36. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 11). Keçeci numbers and the Keçeci prime number: A potential number theoretic exploratory tool. Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  37. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 10). Kececinumbers. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  38. Keçeci, M. (2025). From Majorana fermions to quantum devices: The role of nanomaterials in the second quantum era. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  39. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 1). Keçeci Layout. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  40. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 1). Kececilayout. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  41. Keçeci, M. (2020, October 25). Discourse on the second quantum revolution and nanotechnology applications in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic of inequality. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 9(5), 1–7. eISSN: 2278-5299. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7483395; https://www.mnkjournals.com/journal/ijlrst/Article.php?paper_id=11004. [CrossRef]
  42. Keçeci, M. (2011). 2n-dimensional at Fujii model instanton-like solutions and coupling constant’s role between instantons with higher derivatives. Turkish Journal of Physics, 35(2), 173-178. [CrossRef]
  43. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 6). Grikod2. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  44. Keçeci, M. (2025, May 6). Grikod. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  45. Yaman, M., & Misir, Z. (2022). Finite-Time Behaviour of Solutions to Nonlinear Parabolic equation. New Trends in Mathematical Sciences, 10(4), 47–53. [CrossRef]
  46. Domuschiev, I. (2025, May). Quantum Simulation versus Model Prediction in Human Medicine. ResearchGate. [CrossRef]
  47. de M. Carvalho, A. M., Garcia, G. Q., & Furtado, C. (2025, April). Geometric and Topological Aspects of Quadrupoles of Disclinations: Conformal Metrics and Self-Forces. arXiv: . [CrossRef]
  48. Yıldız, F., Przybylski, M., & Kirschner, J. (2009). Direct evidence of a nonorthogonal magnetization configuration in single crystalline Fe1₋ₓCoₓ/Rh/Fe/Rh(001) system. Physical Review Letters, 103(14), 147203. [CrossRef]
  49. Mikailzade, F., Maksutoglu, M., Khaibullin, R.I., Valeev, V.F., Nuzhdin, V.I., Aliyeva, V.B., & Mammadov, T.G. (2016). Magnetodielectric Effects in Co-implanted TlInS2 and TlGaSe2 Crystals. Phase Transitions, 89(6), 568–577. [CrossRef]
  50. Yalçın, O., et al. (2023). Crystallographic, structural, optical, and dielectric properties of aniline and aniline halide imprinted hydrogels for optoelectronic applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 34(22), 1700. [CrossRef]
  51. Veliev, E. V., Günaydın, S., & Sundu, H. (2018). Thermal properties of the exotic X(3872) state via QCD sum rule. The European Physical Journal Plus, 133(3), 139. [CrossRef]
  52. Rameev, B. (2020). Magnetic Resonance and Microwave Techniques for Security Applications. 2019 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS-Spring). IEEE. [CrossRef]
  53. Bidai, K., Tabeti, A., Mohammed, D. S., Seddik, T., Batouche, M., Özdemir, M., & Bakhti, B. (2020). Carbon substitution enhanced electronic and optical properties of MgSiP2 chalcopyrite through TB-mBJ approximation. Computational Condensed Matter, 24, e00490. [CrossRef]
  54. Mustafa, O., & Güvendi, A. (2025). Fermions in a (2+1)-Dimensional Magnetized Spacetime with a Cosmological Constant: Domain Walls and Spinning Magnetic Vortices. Physics Letters B, [Volume placeholder, e.g., 860], 139569. [CrossRef]
  55. Altun, I., Gençtürk, İ., & Erduran, A. (2023). Prešić-type fixed point results via Q-distance on quasimetric space and application to (p, q)-difference equations. Nonlinear Analysis Modelling and Control, 28(6), 1013-1026. [CrossRef]
  56. Elzwawy, A., Pişkin, H., Akdoğan, N., et al. (2021). Current trends in planar Hall effect sensors: Evolution, optimization, and applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 54(35), 353001. [CrossRef]
  57. Garrett, J., Luis, E., Peng, H.-H., Cera, T., Gobinathj, Borrow, J., Keçeci, M., Splines, Iyer, S., Liu, Y., cjw, & Gasanov, M. (2023). garrettj403/SciencePlots: 2.1.1 (Version 2.1.1). Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  58. Keçeci, M. (2025). Harnessing Geometry for Quantum Computation: Lessons from Nodal-Line Materials. Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  59. Keçeci, M. (2025). Quantum Information at the Edge: Topological Opportunities in Nodal-Line Materials. figshare. [CrossRef]
  60. Keçeci, M. (2025). Nodal-Line Semimetals: Unlocking Geometric Potential in Quantum Information. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  61. Keçeci, M. (2025). Investigating Layered Structures Containing Weyl and Majorana Fermions via the Stratum Model. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  62. Keçeci, M. (2025). From Weyl Fermions to Topological Matter: The Physics of Weyl Semimetals. Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  63. Keçeci, M. (2025). Weyl Semimetals and Their Unique Electronic and Topological Characteristics. figshare. [CrossRef]
  64. Keçeci, M. (2025). Weyl Semimetals: Unveiling Novel Electronic Structures and Topological Properties. WorkflowHub. https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.35.1; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.35.2; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.35.3.
  65. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci’s Arithmetical Square. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  66. Keçeci, M. (2025). kececisquares [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  67. Keçeci, M. (2025). kececifractals [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  68. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Numbers and the Keçeci Prime Number. Authorea. June, 2025. [CrossRef]
  69. Keçeci, M. (2025). Diversity of Keçeci Numbers and Their Application to Prešić-Type Fixed-Point Iterations: A Numerical Exploration. [CrossRef]
  70. Keçeci, M. (2025). kececinumbers [Data set]. Open Work Flow Articles (OWFAs), WorkflowHub. https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.datafile.14.1; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.datafile.14.2; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.datafile.14.3.
  71. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Deterministic Zigzag Layout. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  72. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Zigzag Layout Algorithm. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  73. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Keçeci Layout: A Structural Approach for Interdisciplinary Scientific Analysis. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  74. Keçeci, M. (2025). When Nodes Have an Order: The Keçeci Layout for Structured System Visualization. HAL open science. https://hal.science/hal-05143155; [CrossRef]
  75. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Keçeci Layout: A Cross-Disciplinary Graphical Framework for Structural Analysis of Ordered Systems. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  76. Keçeci, M. (2025). Beyond Traditional Diagrams: The Keçeci Layout for Structural Thinking. Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  77. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Keçeci Layout: A Structural Approach for Interdisciplinary Scientific Analysis. figshare. Journal contribution. [CrossRef]
  78. Keçeci, M. (2025, July 3). The Keçeci Layout: A Structural Approach for Interdisciplinary Scientific Analysis. OSF. [CrossRef]
  79. Keçeci, M. (2025). Beyond Topology: Deterministic and Order-Preserving Graph Visualization with the Keçeci Layout. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  80. Keçeci, M. (2025). kececilayout [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  81. Keçeci, M. (2025). Grikod2 [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  82. Keçeci, M. (2025). Grikod [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  83. Ermurat, M., Arslan M.A., Erzincanlı F., Uzman, İ. (2013). Process parameters investigation of a laser-generated single clad for minimum size using design of experiments. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 19(6):452-462. [CrossRef]
  84. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Relationship Between Gravitational Wave Observations and Quantum Computing Technologies. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  85. Keçeci, M. (2025). Kütleçekimsel Dalga Gözlemleri ile Kuantum Bilgisayar Teknolojileri Arasındaki Teknolojik ve Metodolojik Bağlantılar. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  86. Keçeci, M. (2025). Çoklu İşlemci Mimarilerinde Kuantum Algoritma Simülasyonlarının Hızlandırılması: Cython, Numba ve Jax ile Optimizasyon Teknikleri. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  87. Keçeci, M. (2025). Kuantum Hata Düzeltmede Metrik Seçimi ve Algoritmik Optimizasyonun Büyük Ölçekli Yüzey Kodları Üzerindeki Etkileri. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  88. Keçeci, M. (2025). Kuantum Hata Düzeltme Algoritmalarında Özyineleme Optimizasyonu ve Aşırı Gürültü Toleransı: Kuantum Sıçraması Potansiyelinin Değerlendirilmesi. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  89. Keçeci, M. (2025). Yüksek Kübit Sayılı Kuantum Hesaplamada Ölçeklenebilirlik ve Hata Yönetimi: Yüzey Kodları, Topolojik Malzemeler ve Hibrit Algoritmik Yaklaşımlar. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  90. Keçeci, M. (2025). Künneth Teoremi Bağlamında Özdevinimli ve Evrişimli Kuantum Algoritmalarında Yapay Zekâ Entegrasyonu ile Hata Minimizasyonu. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  91. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Relationship Between Gravitational Wave Observations and Quantum Computing Technologies. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  92. Keçeci, M. (2025). Kütleçekimsel Dalga Gözlemleri ile Kuantum Bilgisayar Teknolojileri Arasındaki Teknolojik ve Metodolojik Bağlantılar. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  93. Keçeci, M. (2025). Accuracy, Noise, and Scalability in Quantum Computation: Strategies for the NISQ Era and Beyond. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  94. Keçeci, M. (2025). Quantum Error Correction Codes and Their Impact on Scalable Quantum Computation: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  95. Keçeci, M. (2025). Nanoscale Quantum Computers Fundamentals, Technologies, and Future Perspectives. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  96. Keçeci, M. (2025). Investigating Layered Structures Containing Weyl and Majorana Fermions via the Stratum Model. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  97. Keçeci, M. (2025). Kuantum geometri, topolojik fazlar ve yeni matematiksel yapılar: Disiplinlerarası bir perspektif. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  98. Keçeci, M. (2025). Understanding quantum mechanics through Hilbert spaces: Applications in quantum computing. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  99. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Unifying Role of Hilbert Space in Quantum Field Theory and Information Science. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175433455.53782703/v1; https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175433455.53782703/v2. [CrossRef]
  100. Keçeci, M. (2025). Weyl Semimetals and Their Unique Electronic and Topological Characteristics. figshare. [CrossRef]
  101. Keçeci, M. (2025). Hilbert Space: The Mathematical Engine of Quantum Information Processing. Open Science Knowledge Articles (OSKAs), Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  102. Keçeci, M. (2025). Exploring Weyl Semimetals: Emergence of Exotic Electrons and Topological Order. HAL open science. https://hal.science/hal-05146435v1.
  103. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Numbers and the Keçeci Prime Number: A Potential Number Theoretic Exploratory Tool. [CrossRef]
  104. Keçeci, M. (2025). kececinumbers [Data set]. figshare. [CrossRef]
  105. Keçeci, M. (2025). From Abstract Theory to Practical Application: The Journey of Hilbert Space in Quantum Technologies. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.0171.v1; https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.0171.v2; https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202508.0171/v1; https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202508.0171/v2.
  106. Keçeci, M. (2025). Between Chaos and Order: A Behavioural Portrait of Keçeci and Oresme Numbers. preprints.ru. [CrossRef]
  107. Keçeci, M. (2025). oresmej [Data set]. ResearchGate. [CrossRef]
  108. Keçeci, M. (2025). oresmej [Data set]. figshare. [CrossRef]
  109. Keçeci, M. (2025). oresmej [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  110. Keçeci, M. (2025). oresmej. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  111. Keçeci, M. (2025). Analysing the Dynamic and Static Structures of Keçeci and Oresme Sequences. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  112. Keçeci, M. (2025). Dynamic Sequences Versus Static Sequences: Keçeci and Oresme Numbers in Focus. Preprints. [CrossRef]
  113. Keçeci, M. (2025). Mobility and Constancy in Mathematical Sequences: A Study on Keçeci and Oresme Numbers. OSF. [CrossRef]
  114. Keçeci, Mehmet (2025). Dynamic and Static Approaches in Mathematics: Investigating Keçeci and Oresme Sequences. Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  115. Keçeci, Mehmet (2025). Dynamic-Static Properties of Keçeci and Oresme Number Sequences: A Comparative Examination. figshare. Journal contribution. [CrossRef]
  116. Keçeci, M. (2025). Variability and Stability in Number Sequences: An Analysis of Keçeci and Oresme Numbers. WorkflowHub. https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.37.1; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.37.2. [CrossRef]
  117. Keçeci, M. (2025). Dynamic vs Static Number Sequences: The Case of Keçeci and Oresme Numbers. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  118. Keçeci, M. (2025). A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on the Keçeci Layout: Structuring Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry. Preprints. [CrossRef]
  119. Keçeci, M. (2025). Oresme. figshare. [CrossRef]
  120. Keçeci, M. (2025). Oresme [Data set]. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  121. Keçeci, M. (2025). Oresme (0.1.0). Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  122. Keçeci, M. (2025). Exploring Weyl Semimetals: Emergence of Exotic Electrons and Topological Order. HAL open science. https://hal.science/hal-05146435; [CrossRef]
  123. Keçeci, M. (2025). The Rise of Weyl Semimetals: Exotic States and Topological Transitions. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  124. Keçeci, M. (2025). Geometric Resilience in Quantum Systems: The Case of Nodal-Line Semimetals. Authorea. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  125. Keçeci, M. (2025). Harnessing Geometry for Quantum Computation: Lessons from Nodal-Line Materials. Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  126. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Sayılarının Nötrosofik ve Hipergerçek Sayılarla Geometrik Yorumlamaları. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  127. Keçeci, M. (2025). Bridging Quantum Theory and Computation: The Role of Hilbert Spaces. WorkflowHub. https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.38.1; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.38.2; https://doi.org/10.48546/workflowhub.document.38.3. [CrossRef]
  128. Keçeci, M. (2025). Hilbert Spaces and Quantum Information: Tools for Next-Generation Computing. figshare. [CrossRef]
  129. Keçeci, M. (2025). Hilbert Space as the Geometric Foundation of Quantum Mechanics and Computing. OSF. [CrossRef]
  130. Noorwali, M., Qawaqneh, H., Tahir, M., Mehmood, A., Abd El-Latif A. M., Aldwoah, K. A., Armada, C. L., Mohammad N. H. M., Hamja J. J. (2025). Triple Fixed-Point Theorems: Generalized Analysis with AI/Crypto Applications. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 18(3), 6609. [CrossRef]
  131. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Varsayımının Kuramsal ve Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. ResearchGate. [CrossRef]
  132. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Varsayımı’nın Hesaplanabilirliği: Sonlu Adımda Kararlı Yapıya Yakınsama Sorunu. WorkflowHub. [CrossRef]
  133. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Varsayımı ve Dinamik Sistemler: Farklı Başlangıç Koşullarında Yakınsama ve Döngüler. Open Science Output Articles (OSOAs), OSF. [CrossRef]
  134. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Varsayımı: Periyodik Çekiciler ve Keçeci Asal Sayısı (KPN) Kavramı. Open Science Knowledge Articles (OSKAs), Knowledge Commons. [CrossRef]
  135. Keçeci, M. (2025). Genelleştirilmiş Keçeci Operatörleri: Collatz Yinelemesinin Nötrosofik ve Hiperreel Sayı Sistemlerinde Uzantıları. Authorea. [CrossRef]
  136. Keçeci, M. (2025). Keçeci Varsayımı: Collatz Genelleştirmesi Olarak Çoklu Cebirsel Sistemlerde Yinelemeli Dinamikler. Open Science Articles (OSAs), Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  137. Keçeci, M. (2025). Geometric Interpretations of Keçeci Numbers with Neutrosophic and Hyperreal Numbers. Zenodo. [CrossRef]
  138. Connes, A. (1994). Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0121858605. https://alainconnes.org/wp-content/uploads/book94bigpdf.pdf.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated