Submitted:
31 July 2025
Posted:
01 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Technical Fundamentals of Self-Starting in Darrieus-Type Wind Turbines
2.1. Evolution of the Self-Starting Concept and Torque Generation in Darrieus-Type Turbines
2.2. Critical Parameters for the Characterization of Aerodynamic Performance
2.3. Specific Self-Starting Challenges
3. Technological Approaches for Enhancing the Self-Starting Capability of H-Type VAWT’s
3.1. Geometrical Optimization of the Airfoil
3.2. Configuration Strategies for H-Type VAWTS
3.3. Passive Flow Control Implementation for Self-Starting Enhancement
3.4. Active Flow Control Implementation for Self-Starting Enhancement
3.5. Incident Flow Enhancement for Improved Starting Performance
4. Critical Discussion of the State of the Art on Self-Starting Strategies in Darrieus VAWTS
5. Research Gaps and Future Trends
6. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, Y.; Roga, S.; Wanmali, N.K. Experimental analysis of hybrid VAWT and the effect of semi-cylindrical attachment to the trailing edge. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2023, 74, 115–0826. [CrossRef]
- International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2022; IEA: Paris, France, 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022 (accessed on 27 July 2025).
- Renewable Energies. Available online: https://www.iec.ch/energies/renewable-energies (accessed on 27 July 2025).
- Celik, Y.; Ingham, D.; Ma, L.; Pourkashanian, M. Novel hybrid blade design and its impact on the overall and self-starting performance of a three-dimensional H-type Darrieus wind turbine. J. Fluids Struct. 2023, 119, 103876. [CrossRef]
- De Tavernier, D.; Ferreira, C.; Goude, A. Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics. Handb. Wind Energy Aerodyn. 2022, 64, 1317–1361. [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, S.; Naik, R.L. Design, development and experimental investigation of H-rotor vertical axis wind turbine under low wind speeds. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2023, 13(1), 49–58. [CrossRef]
- Seifi Davari, H.; Botez, R.M.; Seify Davari, M.; Chowdhury, H.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Numerical and experimental investigation of Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines to enhance self-starting at low wind speeds. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103240. [CrossRef]
- Ghafoorian, F.; Enayati, E.; Mirmotahari, S.R.; Wan, H. Self-starting improvement and performance enhancement in Darrieus VAWTs using auxiliary blades and deflectors. Machines. 2024, 12(11), 806. [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, A.A.; Elbaz, A.M.R.; Melani, P.F.; Mohamed, O.S.; Bianchini, A. Power augmentation of Darrieus wind turbine blades using trapped vortex cavity. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2022, 223, 104949. [CrossRef]
- Eltayesh, A.; Castellani, F.; Natili, F.; Burlando, M.; Khedr, A. Aerodynamic upgrades of a Darrieus vertical axis small wind turbine. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2023, 73, 126–143. [CrossRef]
- Manwell, J.F.; McGowan, J.G.; Brandlard, E.; Ram, B. Wind Energy Explained: On Land and Offshore, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024.
- Tayebi, A.; Torabi, F. Flow control techniques to improve the aerodynamic performance of Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines: A critical review. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2024, 252, 105820. [CrossRef]
- Ritschel, U.; Beyer, M. Designing Wind Turbines: Engineering and Manufacturing Process in the Industrial Context; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Ebert, P.R.; Wood, D.H. Observations of the starting behaviour of a small horizontal-axis wind turbine. Renew. Energy 1997, 12(3), 245–257. [CrossRef]
- Kirke, B. Evaluation of Self-Starting Vertical Axis Wind Turbines for Stand-Alone Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, 1998.
- Hill, N.; Dominy, R.; Ingram, G.; Dominy, J. Darrieus turbines: The physics of self-starting. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A J. Power Energy 2008, 223, 21–29. [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.Y.; Liu, H.J.; Peng, H.Y. Power performance and self-starting features of H-rotor and helical vertical axis wind turbines with different airfoils in turbulence. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 292, 117405. [CrossRef]
- Du, L.; Ingram, G.; Dominy, R.G. A review of H-Darrieus wind turbine aerodynamic research. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 233(23–24), 7590–7616. [CrossRef]
- Worasinchai, S.; Ingram, G.L.; Dominy, R.G. The physics of H-Darrieus turbine starting behavior. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2016, 138(6), 062603. [CrossRef]
- Du, L. Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Darrieus Wind Turbine Start-Up and Operation. Ph.D. Thesis, Durham University, Durham, UK, 2015.
- Celik, Y. Aerodynamics and Self-Starting of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines with J-Shaped Aerofoils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2021.
- Selvarajoo, S.; Mohamed, Z. The effects of dynamic stalls on the aerodynamics and performance of a Darrieus rotor during self-start. Phys. Fluids 2024, 36(1), 017107. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Hao, W.; Li, C.; Luo, S.; Liu, Q.; Gao, C. Effect of geometric parameters of Gurney flap on performance enhancement of straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2021, 165, 464–480. [CrossRef]
- Burton, T.; Jenkins, N.; Bossanyi, E.; Sharpe, D.; Graham, M. Wind Energy Handbook, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021.
- Rosato, M.A. Small Wind Turbines for Electricity and Irrigation: Design and Construction; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019.
- Seifi Davari, H.; Botez, R.M.; Seify Davari, M.; Chowdhury, H.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Blade height impact on self-starting torque for Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2024, 24, 100814. [CrossRef]
- Sang, L.Q.; Phengpom, T.; Thin, D.V.; Duc, N.H.; Hang, L.T.T.; Huyen, C.T.T.; Huong, N.T.T.; Tran, Q.T. A method to design an efficient airfoil for small wind turbines in low wind speed conditions using XFLR5 and CFD simulations. Energies 2024, 17(16), 4113. [CrossRef]
- Naik, K.; Sahoo, N. Aerodynamic performance and starting torque enhancement of small-scale Darrieus type straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines with J-shaped airfoil. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2024, 16(3), 033304. [CrossRef]
- Rezaeiha, A.; Montazeri, H.; Blocken, B. Towards optimal aerodynamic design of vertical axis wind turbines: Impact of solidity and number of blades. Energy 2018, 165, 1129–1148. [CrossRef]
- Celik, Y.; Ingham, D.; Ma, L.; Pourkashanian, M. Design and aerodynamic performance analyses of the self-starting H-type VAWT having J-shaped aerofoils considering various design parameters using CFD. Energy 2022, 251, 123881. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.M.; Sivalingam, K.; Lim, T.C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Wei, H. Strategies for enhancing the low wind speed performance of H-Darrieus wind turbine. Part 1. Clean Technol. 2019, 1(1), 185–204. [CrossRef]
- Bak, C. Airfoil design. In Handbook of Wind Energy Aerodynamics; Stoevesandt, B.; Schepers, G.; Fuglsang, P.; Sun, Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 95–122. [CrossRef]
- Elangovan, K.; Pillai, S.N. Effect of pitch angle on structural and aerodynamic characteristics of vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) using leading-edge protuberance blades. Energies 2025, 18(2), 286. [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.B.; Zhang, L.X.; Li, E.X.; Zhang, F.Y. Blade pitch control of straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. J. Cent. South Univ. 2016, 23(5), 1106–1114. [CrossRef]
- Farzadi, R.; Gharapetian, D.; Bazargan, M. Comprehensive study of vortices interaction and blades height effect in a Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine with J-type blades. Energy Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, e1892. [CrossRef]
- Naik, K.; Sahoo, N. Synergistic effect of J-shape airfoil on the performance of Darrieus-type straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2023, 145(10), 102301. [CrossRef]
- Farzadi, R.; Bazargan, M. 3D numerical simulation of the Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine with J-type and straight blades under various operating conditions including self-starting mode. Energy 2023, 278, 128040. [CrossRef]
- Bel Laveda, O.; Roche, M.A.; Phadtare, M.; Sauge, L.; Xavier, K.J.; Bhat, G.; Saxena, D.; Saini, J.S.; Verdin, P.G. Numerical investigation of aerodynamic performance and structural analysis of a 3D J-shaped based small-scale vertical axis wind turbine. Energies 2023, 16(20), 7024. [CrossRef]
- Maalouly, M.; Souaiby, M.; ElCheikh, A.; Issa, J.S.; Elkhoury, M. Transient analysis of H-type Vertical Axis Wind Turbines using CFD. Energy Reports 2022, 8, 4570–4588. [CrossRef]
- Celik, Y.; Ingham, D.; Ma, L.; Pourkashanian, M. Design and aerodynamic performance analyses of the self-starting H-type VAWT having J-shaped aerofoils considering various design parameters using CFD. Energy 2022, 251, 123881. [CrossRef]
- Celik, Y.; Ingham, D.; Ma, L.; Pourkashanian, M. Novel hybrid blade design and its impact on the overall and self-starting performance of a three-dimensional H-type Darrieus wind turbine. J. Fluids Struct. 2023, 119, 103876. [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Luo, J.; Li, G. Study on the optimal design of vertical axis wind turbine with novel variable solidity type for self-starting capability and aerodynamic performance. Energy 2023, 271, 127031. [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Li, J.; Li, G. Improving the self-starting and operating characteristics of vertical axis wind turbine by changing center distance in part of blades. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 68, 105974. [CrossRef]
- Du, L.; Ingram, G.; Dominy, R.G. Experimental study of the effects of turbine solidity, blade profile, pitch angle, surface roughness, and aspect ratio on the H-Darrieus wind turbine self-starting and overall performance. Energy Sci. Eng. 2019, 7(6), 2421–2436. [CrossRef]
- Mirzaeian, H.; Ghobadian, B.; Mirhosseini, M. Performance analysis and optimization of dual-row vertical axis wind turbines with innovative hybrid blades. Energy Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, e70095. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Shahzad, A.; Shah, S.I.A. Experimental investigation and analysis of proposed hybrid vertical axis wind turbine design. Energy Environ. 2023, 34(8–9), 1801–1817. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Shahzad, A.; Akram, F.; Ahmad, F.; Shah, S.I.A. Design optimization of Double-Darrieus hybrid vertical axis wind turbine. Ocean Eng. 2022, 254, 111171. [CrossRef]
- Uma Reddy, K.; Deb, B.; Roy, B. A numerical and experimental study on the performance of a conventional H-Darrieus wind rotor with auxiliary blades. Ocean Eng. 2023, 280, 114697. [CrossRef]
- Khalid, M.S.U.; Wood, D.; Hemmati, A. Self-starting characteristics and flow-induced rotation of single- and dual-stage vertical-axis wind turbines. Energies 2022, 15(24), 9365. [CrossRef]
- Gad-el-Hak, M. Modern developments in flow control. Appl. Mech. Rev. 1996, 49(7), 365–379. [CrossRef]
- Wiśniewski, P.; Balduzzi, F.; Buliński, Z.; Bianchini, A. Numerical analysis on the effectiveness of Gurney flaps as power augmentation devices for airfoils subject to a continuous variation of the angle of attack by use of full and surrogate models. Energies 2020, 13(8), 1877. [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Avital, E.; Williams, J.; Cui, J. Performance improvements for a vertical axis wind turbine by means of Gurney flap. J. Fluids Eng. 2020, 142(2), 021103. [CrossRef]
- Chakroun, Y.; Bangga, G. Aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil and vertical axis wind turbine employed with Gurney flaps. Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4284. [CrossRef]
- Bianchini, A.; Balduzzi, F.; Di Rosa, D.; Ferrara, G. On the use of Gurney flaps for the aerodynamic performance augmentation of Darrieus wind turbines. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 184, 402–415. [CrossRef]
- Syawitri, T.P.; Yao, Y.; Yao, J.; Chandra, B. Geometry optimisation of vertical axis wind turbine with Gurney flap for performance enhancement at low, medium and high ranges of tip speed ratios. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 49, 101779. [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, W.A.; Somlal, J. Performance enhancement of Darrieus wind turbines using plain flap and Gurney flap configurations: A CFD analysis. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103400. [CrossRef]
- De Gregorio, F.; Fraioli, G. Flow control on a high thickness airfoil by a trapped vortex cavity. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2008.
- Sengupta, A.R.; Kumar, Y.; Biswas, A.; Gupta, R. Performance investigation of cavity shaped blade on H-Darrieus wind turbine in built environmental condition. Energy Sources A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2022, 44, 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Sobhani, E.; Ghaffari, M.; Maghrebi, M.J. Numerical investigation of dimple effects on Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine. Energy 2017, 133, 231–241. [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, M.R.; Khaleghinia, J.; Eshagh, M.N.; Salarian, H. Performance improvement of Darrieus wind turbine using different cavity layouts. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 246, 114693. [CrossRef]
- Yoo, S.; Oh, S. Flow analysis and optimization of a vertical axis wind turbine blade with a dimple. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2021, 15(1), 1666–1681. [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, S.; Ogbonna, I.; Volkov, K. Improvement of self-starting capabilities of vertical axis wind turbines with new design of turbine blades. Sustainability 2021, 13(7), 3854. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Hao, W.; Li, C.; Ding, Q. Numerical study of effect of solidity on vertical axis wind turbine with Gurney flap. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2019, 186, 17–31. [CrossRef]
- Kord, K.; Bazargan, M. Numerical investigation on J-shaped straight-bladed Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines equipped with Gurney flaps. Int. J. Energy Res. 2024, 48, 8992210. [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, A.N.C.; Pereira, J.M.C.; Sousa, J.M.M. Passive control of dynamic stall in a H-Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine using blade leading-edge protuberances. Appl. Energy 2022, 324, 119700. [CrossRef]
- Zamani, M.; Sangtarash, A.; Maghrebi, M.J. Numerical study of porous media effect on the blade surface of vertical axis wind turbine for enhancement of aerodynamic performance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 245, 114598. [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, O.S.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Etman, A.K.; Abdelfatah, A.A.; Elbaz, A.M.R. Numerical investigation of Darrieus wind turbine with slotted airfoil blades. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2020, 5, 100026. [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Zhang, P. Enhancing flow separation control using hybrid passive and active actuators in a matrix configuration. Aerospace 2024, 11(6), 422. [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Wang, X.; Zhu, J.; Kang, S. Dynamic stall of a vertical-axis wind turbine and its control using plasma actuation. Energies 2019, 12(19), 3738. [CrossRef]
- Abdolahifar, A.; Zanj, A. A review of available solutions for enhancing aerodynamic performance in Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbines: A comparative discussion. Energy Convers. Manag. 2025, 327, 119575. [CrossRef]
- Chavoshi, M.Z.; Ebrahimi, A. Self-starting and performance improvement of a Darrieus type wind turbine using the plasma actuator. Phys. Fluids 2024, 36(5), 057120. [CrossRef]
- Chavoshi, M.Z.; Ebrahimi, A. Plasma actuator effects on the flow physics of dynamic stall for a vertical axis wind turbine. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34(7), 075131. [CrossRef]
- Daraee, M.A.; Abbasi, S. A novel approach to performance improvement of a VAWT using plasma actuators. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 424, 138876. [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, S.; Daraee, M.A. Improving vertical-axis wind turbine performance through innovative combination of deflector and plasma actuator. Phys. Fluids 2024, 36(4), 047114. [CrossRef]
- Shyy, W.; Jayaraman, B.; Andersson, A. Modeling of glow discharge-induced fluid dynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92(11), 6434–6443. [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Lian, S.; Yan, H. Aerodynamic performance analysis of adaptive drag-lift hybrid type vertical axis wind turbine. Energies 2022, 15(15), 5600. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Miao, W.; Ye, Q.; Li, C. Performance assessment of an innovative Gurney flap for straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 1124–1138. [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.H.; Chong, W.T.; Sukiman, N.L.; Poh, S.C.; Shiah, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-T. Performance enhancements on vertical axis wind turbines using flow augmentation systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 904–921. [CrossRef]
- Chegini, S.; Asadbeigi, M.; Ghafoorian, F.; Mehrpooya, M. An investigation into the self-starting of Darrieus–Savonius hybrid wind turbine and performance enhancement through innovative deflectors: A CFD approach. Ocean Eng. 2023, 287, 115910. [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.H.; Wong, K.H.; Chong, W.T.; Ng, J.H.; Qiu, C.J.; Khor, C.S. Performance evaluation of a downwind diffuser on vertical axis wind turbine. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 351–369. [CrossRef]
- Fatahian, E.; Mishra, R.; Jackson, F.F.; Fatahian, H. Optimization and analysis of self-starting capabilities of vertical axis wind turbine pairs: A CFD-Taguchi approach. Ocean Eng. 2024, 302, 117614. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tong, G.; Ma, Y.; Feng, F.; Tagawa, K. Numerical study on aerodynamic performance improvement of the straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine by using wind concentrators. Renew. Energy 2023, 219, 119545. [CrossRef]































| Reference | Method | VAWT Parameters | TSR, Wind Speed | Self-Starting Improvement Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [35] | CFD Simulations (2D/3D), URANS, k-ω SST & k-ε | NACA0021, J-profile; N=3, D=1.2 m, H=0.8–3.0 m, c=0.2 m | λ = 0.25 – 1.5 =10.0 m/s |
J-profile improves startup torque, especially for long blades and low TSR. |
| [28,36] | CFD Simulations (2D), URANS, k-ω SST; Experimental Wind Tunnel Tests | NACA4418/4415, J-profile; N=3, D=2.5 m, H=1.0 m, c=0.4 m | λ = 1.6 =10.0 m/s |
J-profile enhances torque at low TSR; 70% OR gives ~25% efficiency gain; top-surface cut performs better. |
| [37] | CFD Simulations (3D), URANS, k-ω SST | NACA0021, J-profile; N=3, D=1.2 m, H=1.2 m, c=0.2 m | λ = 0.5 – 1.5 = 5.0 - 20.0 m/s |
J-profile increases startup torque by 37.6% at 5 m/s and 26.9% at 10 m/s; less efficient at high TSR. |
| [38] | CFD Simulations (3D), URANS, k-ω SST & k-ε; FEA Structural Analysis | NACA0015, J-profile; N=3, D=2.5 m, H=3.0 m, c=0.4 m | λ = 0.6 – 1.6 =10.0 m/s |
18.34% improvement in startup torque (k-ω SST); 5.84% (k-ε); aluminum alloy used. |
| [39] | CFD Simulations (2D), k-ω SST; Taguchi Optimization | NACA0012/15/17/21; c=0.2–0.8 m; β=0°, 2°, 4°; N=3, D=0.85 m | λ = 0 – 3.5 =7.0 m/s |
Longer chord improves transient startup; NACA0017, c=0.6 m, β=4° yielded best overall performance. |
| [40] | CFD Simulations (2D), k-ω SST, SIMPLE Algorithm | Various base airfoils (NACA0012/18/25/45); OR 0–90%; N=3, D=0.75 m, H=0.6 m, c=0.083 m | λ = 1.5 (Bajo) -3.0 (Alto) =4.0 - 6.0 m/s |
OR = 90% improves self-start at low TSR; OR = 10% fails to initiate rotation; β = 2° optimal. |
| [41] | CFD Simulations (2D/3D), RANS, Self-start Model | NACA0018 center + J-profile tips (OR=40%); N=3, D=0.75 m, H=3.0 m, c=0.083 m | λ = 1.5 (Bajo) -3.0 (Alto) =5.0 m/s |
Hybrid blade (NACA0018 center + J-tips) showed best startup performance and peak efficiency. |
| Reference | Method | VAWT Parameters | TSR, Wind Speed | Self-Starting Improvement Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [7] | DMST, MATLAB, PSO optimization | NACA0015/4412/4415; N=3, R=0.175 m, H=0.35–0.75 m, c=0.071 m | λ=0–3.0, =1.0–10.0 m/s |
Optimized NACA0015 with embossing required 0.0805 Nm start torque (21.97% better). |
| [17] | Experimental, Closed-circuit wind tunnel | NACA0018/4418; H and helical blades; β=0°, -3°, -6°; D=0.68 m, RA=1.25, c=0.172 m | λ=0.25–3.0, =5.0 m/s | Straight blades require less start time; NACA0018 offers higher CP but lower start; NACA4418, vice versa. |
| [26] | DMST, MATLAB, Wind tunnel with 4 fans | NACA0015, embossed; N=3, R=0.175 m, H=0.35 m, σ=1.15, c=0.071 m | λ=0–2.5, =0.5–11.0 m/s |
Embossed blades reduced starting force by up to 34.6%. |
| [42] | 2D CFD simulation, SST (k-ω), URANS | NACA0018; σ=0.417, 0.83; N=5; D=0.6–2.10 m; Jz=0.0683–0.8362 kgm²; c=0.075 m | λ=1.25–5.0, =7.9 m/s | High solidity favored self-starting, low solidity improved generation; 188% power increase vs fixed solidity. |
| [44] | Experimental, Wind tunnel | NACA0021/4415/DU06W200; β=0°, -2°, -4°; R=0.30–0.45 m; H=0.6–0.7 m; σ=0.67–1.0 | λ=0.2–2.5, =7.0 m/s | Higher AR and some negative β favored self-start; surface roughness helped in high solidity only. |
| [45] | 2D CFD simulation, SST (k-ω), RANS, Taguchi DOE | NACA0015/DU06W200-J; N=3 (inner/outer); c=0.4 m (outer), 0.27 m (inner) | λ=0.5–2.5, 10.0 m/s | Hybrid VAWT reduced downstream vorticity and wake effects, improving low TSR efficiency. |
| [46] | 2D CFD simulation | DU06-W-200 (inner), NACA0018 (outer); N=3 (both) | λ=1.0–5.0 | Positive static torque across all angles, confirming self-starting ability. |
| [47] | 3D CFD, RANS, DMS Q-Blade, DOE (Box-Behnken) | DU06W200; N=3, R=0.789 m, H=1.605 m, σ=0.67–1.0; β=-3.41°; c=0.547 m | λ=1.0–5.0, =2.81–7.5 m/s | Max CP = 0.491 at TSR = 3.0; static torque positive; self-start at 2.81 m/s. |
| [48] | CFD simulation (k-ε), Experimental | NREL S823 + aux blades; N=3, D=0.3 m, c=0.1 m (main), 0.05 m (aux) | λ=0.4–2.0, =6.0 m/s | Auxiliary blades maintained positive torque at all azimuth angles, ensuring self-starting. |
| [49] | 2D CFD simulation, SST (k-ω), URANS | NACA0018; N=3 inner/outer; R=0.5 m; c=0.06 m (outer) | λ=0–6.0, =4.0–10.0 m/s | Phase-shifted twin-rotor VAWTs (30–90°) improved start at ≥4.0 m/s. |
| References | Method | VAWT Parameters | TSR, Wind Speed | Self-Starting Improvement Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [9] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0021 with circular cavity, N=3, D=1.03 m, σ=0.25, c=0.0858 m | λ=1.6–3.1 | Cavities enhance initial torque by reducing separation and stabilizing flow at low to moderate TSR. |
| [23] | CFD 2D | NACA0018 with GF, N=3, R=0.75 m, H=2.25 m, c=0.09 m, GF_H=0.5%–1.75%, GF_W=0.04%–0.12% | λ=2.75–3.75, =9.0 m/s | Improved upstream force and torque stability lead to better blade rotation. |
| [33] | Wind tunnel experiment | S1046 with tubercles N = 4, D = 0.90 m H = 0.70 m, σ = 0.78 c = 0.1435 – 0.16 m β = -20° to 20° |
=6.0 – 20.0 m/s | LEP blades show superior self-starting capability compared to unmodified blades. |
| [51] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0012/15/18/21 with GF, N=1–3, D=1.03–3.50 m, σ=0.057–0.250, c=0.086–0.200 m, GF_H=0%–5% | λ=3.30–4.45, =8.0–13.0 m/s | Interior GF increases CM, fish-tail GFs enhance torque but reduce CP slightly. |
| [52] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0018 with GF, N=3, R=0.85 m, c=0.246 m, GF_H=1.0%–5.0% | λ=1.0–3.5, =8.0 m/s | GF delays dynamic stalls, increasing CL, lift-drag ratio, and CM. |
| [53] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0021 with GF, N=2, R=1.0 m, β=6°, c=0.265 m, GF_H=0.5%–6.0%, GF_A=90°–105° | λ=0.5–3.0, =8.0 m/s | GF at low AOA increases lift and load stability, aiding blade rotation initiation. |
| [54] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0021 with GF, N=3, R=0.515 m, c=0.0858 m, σ=0.249, GF_H=1%–3% | λ=2.1–6.0, =9.0 m/s | Internal GF at 0.003c yields 21.3% CP improvement at TSR=2.4 with better CM. |
| [55] | CFD 2D, RANS-LES, Taguchi | NACA0021 with GF, D=1.03 m, N=3, c=0.0858 m, GF_H=0.02c–0.04c, GF_A=60°–135°, GF_P=0–0.07c | λ=1.44–3.3, =9 m/s | Optimized GF (0.03c, 90°) at trailing edge improved CP at low TSR, enabling earlier torque generation. |
| [56] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0015 with GF and PF, N=3, R=1.0–2.5 m, c=0.16–0.4 m, PF_P=0.50c–0.90c, GF_H=0.15c–0.25c, GF_A=90°–120°, PF_A=10°–120° | λ=0.8–4.5, =5–10 m/s | PFs outperform GFs in reducing negative torque and enhancing low speed self-start. PF at 0.7c, 10° yielded maximum CM. |
| [58] | CFD 2D (k-ε), Experimental | S1046, NACA0021 with circular cavities, N=3, D=0.4 m, H=0.4 m, σ=0.6, c=0.08 m | λ=0.5–2.0, =5–7 m/s | Internal cavity improved self-start only at 5 m/s; unmodified performed better at 7 m/s. |
| [60] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | NACA0021 with circular cavities, N=3, R=1.03 m, c=0.0858 m | λ=2.0–3.5, =8.0 m/s | Circular cavities near leading edge boost startup torque. |
| [61] | CFD 2D, URANS, Spalart-Allmaras, GA | NACA0021 with dimples, N=3, D=NE, c=NE | λ=2.5, =9.0 m/s | Small dimples near the trailing edge increase CP and maximize CM via flow separation delay. |
| [62] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω) | NACA0012 with vent slots, N=3, R=1.0 m, c=0.2 m | λ=0–3.0, =5.0 m/s | Vent slots improve startup torque at AOA >90° and low TSRs. |
| [63] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω) | NACA0021 with GF + cavities, N=3–6, c=0.0858 m, σ=0.175–0.5, GF_H=2% | λ=1.0–3.1, =9.0 m/s | External GF + dimples increase aerodynamic force at low TSR, aiding startup. |
| [64] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), RANS | Du06-W-200 with J-profile and GFs, N=3, D=3.7 m, c=0.297 m, GF_H=0.75%–2.75% | λ=0.6–2.5, =10 m/s | Only internal GF improved CP at high TSR. External or dual flaps lowered global efficiency. |
| [65] | CFD 3D (k-ε), Experimental | NACA0018 with sinusoidal LEPs, N=3, D=0.45 m, H=0.45 m, σ=0.5, c=0.075 m | λ=1.0–4.0, =5.5–9.0 m/s | CP increased to 46% at 5.5 m/s and 20% at 9.0 m/s: better self-starting at 5.5 m/s. |
| [66] | CFD 2D, SST (k–ω), URANS | DU06-W-200 with porous stripes, N=3, D=3.7 m, H=3.3 m, c=0.27 m | λ=0.5–4.0, =10.0 m/s | Porous media on pressure side improve CP and CM, enhancing low speed self-start. |
| [67] | CFD 2D (k–ε) | NACA0018 with slot, N=3, D=4.7 m, c=0.47 m, σ=0.3 | λ=0–4.0, =8.0 m/s | Slotted profile triples CM at TSR<2, enhancing self-start. |
| Reference | Method | VAWT Parameters | TSR, Wind Speed | Self-Starting Improvement Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [71,72] | 2D CFD Simulation URANS model with transition (y–Reθt) |
NACA0021 with plasma actuator N = 3, D = 1.028 m, H = 1.0 m, c = 0.085 m, σ = 0.25 |
λ=2.4 =9.02 m/s |
The plasma actuator mitigates dynamic stall by reducing negative torque at low TSRs, shortens startup time, and increases CP. |
| [73,74] | 2D CFD Simulation URANS with SST (k–ω) model |
NACA0022 with time-varying plasma actuator D = 0.6 m, c = 0.1 m, H = 0.4 m |
λ=2.45 =5.07 m/s |
Time-varying sinusoidal and cosinusoidal forces enhance torque CM and CP by delaying flow separation, enabling improved self-starting capability. |
| [76] | 2D CFD Simulation with 6DOF and RNG k–ε model Experimental wind tunnel tests |
NACA0018 with hybrid drag-lift adaptive blade N = 4, R = 0.66 m, H = 0.73 m, c = 0.1 m |
λ=0 – 5 =6.0 m/s |
Hybrid control lowers cut-in wind speed. At 80° blade opening, torque coefficient CM nearly doubled, confirming improved startup performance. |
| [77] | 2D CFD Simulation URANS with SST (k–ω) model |
NACA0021 with moving Gurney flap and cavity N = 3, D = 1.03 m, c = 0.086 m, σ = 0.25, GFH = 1.5% |
λ=1.43 – 3.29 =9.0 m/s |
The cavity-Gurney flap combination enhances aerodynamic efficiency in specific operating ranges. The moving flap outperforms the fixed one by adapting to blade rotation, reducing negative torque and aiding startup. |
| Reference | Method | VAWT Parameters | TSR, Wind Speed | Self-Starting Improvement Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [8] | 2D CFD simulation SST (k–ω) model, URANS |
NACA0021 (main and auxiliary blades), Deflectors N = 3, D = 1.03 m, c = 0.0858 m |
λ=0.5 – 3.5 =9.0 m/s |
Auxiliary blades with optimized pitch angle and position improved efficiency and starting performance. Deflectors only enhanced torque CM. |
| [78] | 2D CFD simulation and experiments SST (k–ω) model, URANS |
NACA0021 with rear flat diffuser N = 5, D = 1.03 m, H = 1.456 m |
λ=1.5 – 4.5 =9.0 m/s |
Downstream diffuser increased maximum CP by 31.42% at TSR 0.65–0.75, and CM by 26.79%. |
| [79] | 2D CFD simulation SST (k–ω) model, URANS |
Hybrid Darrieus: NACA0021, N = 3, D = 1.03 m, c = 0.0858 m Savonius: N = 2, D = 0.2 m |
λ=1.0 – 4.0 =9.0 m/s |
Hybrid Darrieus-Savonius turbine demonstrated self-starting at low TSR. Deflectors counteracted drag effect of Savonius rotor at high TSR. |
| [80] | 2D and 3D CFD simulation SST (k–ω) model, URANS |
NACA0021, Two Darrieus VAWTs N = 3, D = 0.75 m, H = 1.0 m, c = 0.083 m |
λ=1.0 – 4.0 =8.0 m/s |
Optimized turbine arrangement reduced downstream rotor start-up time from 6.7 s to 4.6 s by utilizing the upstream accelerated flow. |
| [81] | 2D CFD simulation SST (k–ω) model |
NACA0018, Upper and lower wind concentrators N = 3, D = 0.6 m, H = 0.5 m, c = 0.1 m |
λ=0.2 – 2.2 =4.0, 5.0, 8.0, 10.0 m/s |
Concentrators increased average CM: 23.3% at 4.0 m/s, 24.7% at 5.0 m/s, 22.8% at 8.0 m/s, 21% at 10.0 m/s. |
| Strategy | Main Objective | Key Advantages | Limitations | Validation Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerodynamic Profile Optimization | Increase torque at low TSR by modifying blade shape and parameters | No external systems; effective at low wind speeds | Trade-off with high-TSR efficiency | Mainly 2D CFD; limited experimental validation |
| Structural Configuration | Redistribute aerodynamic forces through blade arrangement and structure | Can enhance torque generation without energy input | Requires structural adjustments; mechanical complexity | Numerical with some experimental models |
| Passive Flow Control | Delay flow separation using surface modifications (e.g., Gurney flaps, cavities) | Low-cost; no external energy required | Limited effectiveness across wide TSR range | Validated in CFD; limited full-scale trials |
| Active Flow Control | Actively modify flow via actuators to boost torque during startup | High adaptability and potential performance boost | Requires energy, complex control systems, and robust materials | Mostly CFD; lacks real-world validation |
| Incident Flow Enhancement | Increase wind speed impacting rotor via ducts, deflectors, auxiliary blades | Improves local wind velocity and startup performance | Space requirements, sensitivity to wind direction | Combination of CFD and experiments; mostly 2D |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).