Submitted:
27 July 2025
Posted:
29 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Related Works
2.1. Blockchain in Supply Chain Traceability
2.2. Web Applications with Traceability Technologies
2.3. Blockchain in the Agricultural Supply Chain
2.4. Impacts and Benefits of Using Blockchain
3. Methodology
3.1. Design Thinking Method

4. Results
4.1. Empathize
- Reliable traceability: Lack of product journey visibility generates mistrust and quality risks.
- Data integrity: Concern about manipulable records; automatic and immutable validation is required.
- Alerts and operational visibility: Need for visual indicators and stock and status notifications.
- Usability: A simple and intuitive platform is required for non-technical users.
- External transparency: Companies are seeking to demonstrate verified traceability to build customer confidence and maintain quality standards at the time of their audits.
4.2. Define
- Recording and monitoring of batches in phases with traceability evidence.
- Automatic generation of events and history in an immutable blockchain network.
- User-friendly interface to register products, filter data, and consult traceability.
- Secure access with defined roles for plant managers and auditors.
4.3. Ideate
- It is assumed that end users have a stable internet connection to navigate the platform without interruptions.
- Key users are assumed to have basic digital knowledge to interact with web interfaces.
- It is assumed that companies in the agricultural sector will be willing to adopt a digital solution as long as it helps them to comply with regulations and improve the efficiency of their operations.
- If blockchain technology is used to register traceability events, then data integrity will be guaranteed, avoiding subsequent manipulations of the initial data.
- If the system interface is intuitive and clear, then it will facilitate its adoption for all users, thus decreasing the need for additional training.
- If automated processes through smart contracts, then the response time in critical operations will be reduced, increasing the overall efficiency of the system.
4.4. Interface Prototypes
4.5. System Architecture
- Web Application: web application developed in Angular framework that acts as the primary interface for users.
- ASP.NET Core API: REST API that implements the business logic of the system, handling operations such as batch registration, event validation and connection to the blockchain.
- SQL Server: Relational database used to store operational system information such as users, inventory, events, and intermediate traceability.
- Hyperledger Fabric Network: Permissioned blockchain network responsible for the immutable recording of critical events associated with batches, such as status changes, audits, and deliveries.
- Azure Active Directory: External authentication service used to handle login and JWT token issuing.
4.6. Testing
4.6.1. Participant Selection
- Profiles: Plant managers (7) and quality auditors (3)
- Criteria: Minimum 6 months of experience in a similar role and basic computer literacy.
- Sampling: intentional sampling in two pilot companies with prototypes in alpha phase.
4.6.2. Instrument
4.6.3. SUS Data Processing
- For odd-numbered items: Score′= (response – 1)
- For even-numbered items: Score′ = (5 – response)
- Sum the 10 score′ for each participant → multiply by 2.5 → range 0-100.
- Acceptability threshold: SUS ≥ 68
4.6.4. The Response Distribution Among the 10 Participants Is Presented Below:
- Items 1, 5 and 10 (“easy to use”, “others would learn quickly”, “I would like to use it”) scored mostly 4-5.
- Items 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 (prior to learning, cumbersome, inconsistency, technical support, complexity) scored low (1-2) in 70-90% of cases.
- Items 3 and 7 (safety, integrated functions) received 4 - 5 out of 90% of the participants.
4.6.5. Interpretation:
- 90 > 68 (excellent usability, according to SUS benchmarks)
4.6.6. Success criteria
- Obtain mean ≥ 68.
5. Discussion
5. Conclusions
5. Future Works
References
- Tran, D.; Schouteten, J.J.; Gellynck, X.; De Steur, H. How Do Consumers Value Food Traceability?–A Meta-Analysis. Food Control 2024, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, R.B.; Torrisi, N.M.; Pantoni, R.P. Third Party Certification of Agri-Food Supply Chain Using Smart Contracts and Blockchain Tokens. Sensors 2021, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y. Research on the Cross-Chain Model of Rice Supply Chain Supervision Based on Parallel Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Foods 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subashini, B.; Hemavathi, D. Scalable Blockchain Technology for Tracking the Provenance of the Agri-Food. Computers, Materials and Continua 2023, 75, 3339–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krstić, M.; Agnusdei, G.P.; Tadić, S.; Miglietta, P.P. Prioritization of E-Traceability Drivers in the Agri-Food Supply Chains. Agricultural and Food Economics 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugandh, U.; Nigam, S.; Khari, M.; Misra, S. An Approach for Risk Traceability Using Blockchain Technology for Tracking, Tracing, and Authenticating Food Products. Information (Switzerland) 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, K.A.; Din, I.U.; Almogren, A.; Kim, B.-S. Fog-Computing-Based Cyber–Physical System for Secure Food Traceability through the Twofish Algorithm. Electronics (Switzerland) 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagarakis, A.C.; Benos, L.; Kateris, D.; Tsotsolas, N.; Bochtis, D. Bridging the Gaps in Traceability Systems for Fresh Produce Supply Chains: Overview and Development of an Integrated Iot-based System. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curto, J.P.; Gaspar, P.D. Traceability in Food Supply Chains: SME Focused Traceability Framework for Chain-Wide Quality and Safety—Part 2. AIMS Agriculture and Food 2021, 6, 708–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Z.; Alam, T.; Al Sulaie, S.; Bouye, M.; Deebani, W.; Song, M. An Efficient IoT-Based Perspective View of Food Traceability Supply Chain Using Optimized Classifier Algorithm. Inf Process Manag 2023, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyan, S. A Blockchain-Based Inventory System with Lot Size-Dependent Lead Times and Uncertain Carbon Footprints. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2024, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, A.; Li, H. The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ordoñez, C.C.; Organero, M.M.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, G.; Corrales, J.C. Smart Contracts as a Tool to Support the Challenges of Buying and Selling Coffee Futures Contracts in Colombia. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, Y.; Rozuar, N.H.M.; Mergeresa, F. The Blockchain-Enabled Technology and Carbon Performance: Insights from Early Adopters. Technol Soc 2021, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casati, M.; Soregaroli, C.; Frizzi, G.L.; Stranieri, S. Impacts of Blockchain Technology in Agrifood: Exploring the Interplay between Transactions and Firms’ Strategic Resources. Supply Chain Management 2024, 29, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varavallo, G.; Caragnano, G.; Bertone, F.; Vernetti-Prot, L.; Terzo, O. Traceability Platform Based on Green Blockchain: An Application Case Study in Dairy Supply Chain. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Li, M.; Yu, H.; Wang, M.; Xu, D.; Sun, C. A Trusted Blockchain-Based Traceability System for Fruit and Vegetable Agricultural Products. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 36282–36293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gondal, M.U.A.; Khan, M.A.; Haseeb, A.; Albarakati, H.M.; Shabaz, M. A Secure Food Supply Chain Solution: Blockchain and IoT-Enabled Container to Enhance the Efficiency of Shipment for Strawberry Supply Chain. Front Sustain Food Syst 2023, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Yuen, C.W.; Koting, S.B.; Musa, S.N.B. Construction of a Blockchain Based Cold Chain Logistics Information Platform for Gannan Navel Oranges to Enhance Transparency and Efficiency. Front Sustain Food Syst 2024, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikelsone, E.; Cīrule, I. Design Thinking Approach to Create Impact Assessment Tool: Cities2030 Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, U.; Regan, Á.; Hearne, D.; O’Meara, C. Empathising, Defining and Ideating with the Farming Community to Develop a Geotagged Photo App for Smart Devices: A Design Thinking Approach. Agric Syst 2021, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurst, Z.M.; Spiegal, S. Design Thinking for Responsible Agriculture 4.0 Innovations in Rangelands. Rangelands 2023, 45, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweitzer, R.; Schlögl, S.; Schweitzer, M. Technology-Supported Behavior Change—Applying Design Thinking to MHealth Application Development. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ 2024, 14, 584–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Ryu, S.J. Enhancing Sustainable Design Thinking Education Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Synchronous Online and Offline Classes. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiñones, D.; Ruz, F.; Díaz-Arancibia, J.; Paz, F.; Osega, J.; Rojas, L.F. Innovating Statistics Education: The Design of a Novel App Using Design Thinking. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooke, J. SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry; CRC Press: London, 1996; pp. 189–194. [Google Scholar]
- Hyzy, M.; Bond, R.; Mulvenna, M.; Bai, L.; Dix, A.; Leigh, S.; Hunt, S. System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022, 10, e37290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]













| Use Case | Description | Key Benefits | Case example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimization of transactional efficiency and development of strategic capabilities | BCT integration to improve transaction efficiency and leverage dynamic resources and capabilities in agri-food SMEs | Increased transactional efficiency Improved transparency Improved reputation and access to new markets |
Six BCT Implementations in Italian Agri-Food Companies [15]. |
| Green traceability platform in the dairy chain | Algorand-based traceability system (Pure Proof-of-Stake) for real-time, low-energy recording of all PDO cheese production events | Immutability of data Low energy consumption Reduction of transaction costs Immediate information availability |
Platform applied to the supply of Fontina PDO (from farm to final consumer) using blockchain [16] |
| Blockchain-based fruit and vegetable traceability system | Design of a dual system for off-chain storage of public information | Increased transparency of data Efficiency in the retrieval of information Secure private information Guarantee of the authenticity and reliability of the records |
Implemented in an apple production company with QR tags on each package [17]. |
| Secure strawberry shipping system with blockchain and IoT-enablement. | Ethereum-based framework that uses IoT containers with sensors and Raspberry Pi to capture temperature, humidity, and location data, uses smart contracts to monitor interactions, trigger events | Promote transparency and informed decision-making by immutably recording each transaction. Provides automatic notifications of parameter violations | Strawberry supply chain demonstration: container equipped with IoT (Raspberry Pi 3 and sensors), MQTT server in the cloud and smart contracts on Ethereum [18]. |
| Blockchain-Based Cold Chain Logistics Information Platform | Use of blockchain alliance with SMART-PBFT consensus that unifies legacy systems, improves interoperability and enables real-time monitoring of logistics and environmental data | Improves transparency and traceability of logistics data Optimize logistics management processes Reduce operating costs |
Implemented for the management of orange cold chain with greater efficiency and coordination among system participants [19]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).