Submitted:
16 July 2025
Posted:
17 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
- Analysis of multidimensional geological data: ML algorithms (SVM - support vector machines, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting analyze a set of data (geology, tectonics, geochemistry, geophysics, remote sensing) to build mineral potential maps and forecast and exploration models. AI reveals hidden patterns linking known deposits with the geological environment and extrapolates them to new territories;
- Integration of Earth observation data: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) efficiently process satellite and aerial images to: Automatically recognize lineaments, ring structures, zones of altered rocks (silicification, listvenization, etc.) associated with mineralization; Identify spectral anomalies indicating the presence of certain minerals; Classify lithology and structures.
- Automatic processing and filtering: Deep learning algorithms (autoencoders) effectively suppress noise in geophysical data (magnetic, gravity, electrical exploration), highlighting useful signals;
- Anomaly recognition and classification: CNN and other neural network architectures automatically highlight and classify anomalies potentially associated with ore bodies on magnetic and gravity field maps, geoelectric sections;
- 3D inversion and modeling: ML and deep learning methods significantly accelerate and improve the accuracy of solving inverse problems of geophysics, building realistic 3D models of the geological environment based on geophysical data. Deep learning is used for nonlinear inversion.
- Geochemical anomaly detection: Algorithms (k-means, DBSCAN, anomaly detection methods such as Isolation Forest) allow for objective identification of significant geochemical anomalies against regional variations, minimizing subjectivity;
- Prediction of mineralization types: Classification models (SVM, Random Forest, neural networks) based on multi-element geochemical spectra predict the probability of detecting certain types of deposits (porphyry copper, gold-quartz, etc.) and identify primary dispersion halos.
- Automatic lithology partitioning: LSTM (long short-term memory, CNN) algorithms analyze log data (GR, PS, NNCT, resistivity, etc.) and core images to automatically identify lithologic boundaries and rock types along the borehole;
- Core image analysis: CNNs process core photos and scans to: Recognize and quantify minerals; Identify textures and structures; Assess fractures and porosity; Detect signs of mineralization;
- Exploration program optimization: Optimization algorithms (ML-based or heuristic) help plan optimal well networks to achieve exploration goals at minimal cost.
- Synthesis of heterogeneous information: AI systems (often based on Bayesian networks or deep learning) integrate geology, geophysics, geochemistry, drilling, remote sensing data into a single consistent 3D geological model of a deposit or area;
- Prediction of block model parameters: Algorithms (Geostatistical ML, Random Forest for regression) are used to spatially predict the grades of useful components, density, lithology and other parameters in resource model blocks, increasing the accuracy of reserve estimates.
- Planning of mining operations. Models allow to define quarry boundaries, calculate production capacity and term of reserves development;
- Analysis of stress-strain state of rock mass. Models allow to take into account the influence of mining operations on the state of the massif, to determine stable parameters of workings and chambers;
- Modeling and optimization of special methods of driving. With the help of numerical models, the efficiency of artificial freezing of rocks or chemical preliminary consolidation is studied.
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| GIS | Geographic information systems |
| GE | Geological exploration |
| SMD | Solid mineral deposits |
| SVM | Support vector machines |
| CNN | Convolutional neural networks |
| IDB | Interactive database |
References
- Marakova, I.A. (2024). Method for increasing the efficiency of exploration work in complex zones of the Timan-Pechora province based on solving inverse problems of geophysics.
- Zakrevsky, K.E. (2009). Geological 3D modeling, OOO IPC Maska, Moscow, 376 p.
- Malivanov, S.Yu. Integrated modeling environment now covers geological and geoecological areas of development [Electronic resource] https://ardexpert.ru/article/12712 (date of access 06/05/2025).
- Stadnik, D.A. , Gabaraev O.Z., Stadnik N.M., Grigoryan K.L. (2020). Improving the quality of digital "doubles" of mining enterprises based on the standardization of the attributive content of technological 3D models in GGIS // Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin. pp. 202-212. [CrossRef]
- Roadmap for the development of "end-to-end" digital technology " (2019). Neurotechnology and artificial intelligence" // Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation.
- Dmitrievsky, A.N., Eremin, N.A., Filippova, D.S., & Safarova, E.A. (2020). The digital oil and gas complex of Russia. Georesursy (Georesources), Special issue, 32–35. [CrossRef]
- Khasanov, M.M. , Prokofyev, D.O., Ushmaev, O.S., Belozerov, B.V., Gilmanov, R.R., & Margarit, A.S. (2016). Promising Big Data technologies in petroleum engineering: Gazprom Neft’s experience. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo – Oil Industry, (12), 76–79. [In Russian].
- More than just data. (2018, September). Siberian Oil. Industry 4.0 supplement. Issue 154. Retrieved from https://www.gazprom-neft.ru/press-center/sibneft-online/archive/2018-septemberprojects/1863684/.
- Mashika, A.G. (2020, December 24). Why cloud computing is needed in the oil and gas sector. Retrieved from http://neftianka.ru/zachem-nuzhny-oblachnye-vychisleniya-v-neftegazovom-sektore/ [In Russian].
- Digital transformation. End-to-end technologies. Retrieved from https://digital.gazprom-neft.ru/technologies?page=2.
- Gazprom Neft is developing machine learning technologies. Retrieved from https://www.gazprom-neft.ru/press-center/news/gazprom-neft-razvivaet-tekhnologii-mashinnogo-obucheniya/.
- Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation. (2019). Roadmap for the development of end-to-end digital technology: Virtual and augmented reality technologies. [In Russian].
- Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation. (2019). Roadmap for the development of end-to-end digital technology: New production technologies. [In Russian].
- Varlamov, A.I., Gogonenkov, G.N., Melnikov, P.N., & Cheremisina, E.N. (2021). Current state and development prospects of digital technologies in oil and gas geology and subsurface use in Russia. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza (Geology of Oil and Gas), (3), 5–20. [CrossRef]
- Cheremisina, E.N. , Kostyleva, T.V., & Muradyan, A.V. (2021). Digitalization in geological exploration: Review and analysis of the current state. Geoinformatika (Geoinformatics), (4), 18–27. [CrossRef]
- Kerimov, V.Y. , Bondarev, A.V., & Mustaev, R.N. (2017). Estimation of geological risks in searching and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo – Oil Industry, (8), 36–41. [CrossRef]
- Kerimov, V.Yu. , Guliyev I.S., Javadova A.S., Mustayev R.N., Gurbanov V.Sh., Huseynova Sh.M. (2024b). Shale oil and gas systems of the South Caspian Basin // ANAS Transactions, Earth Sciences. №. 2, pp. 123-140.
- Kerimov, V.Yu. , Aliyev E.M., Serikova U.S., Guryanov S.A. (2024). Impact of mining and oil and gas industries on the environment and climate of the Caspian region // Gornyi Zhurnal. № 12, pp. 92-99.
- Kerimov, V.Y. , Bondarev, A.V., Mustaev, R.N. (2017). Estimation of geological risks in searching and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits // Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo - Oil Industry. №8, pp. 36–41.
- Guliev, S. , Mustaev, R.N., Kerimov, V.Y., & Yudin, M.N. (2018). Degassing of the Earth: Scale and implications. Gornyi Zhurnal, (11), 38–42. [CrossRef]
- Kerimov, V.Yu. , Shilov, G.Ya., Mustayev, R.N., & Dmitrievsky, S.S. (2016). Thermobaric conditions of hydrocarbon accumulation in the low-permeability oil reservoirs of the Khadum Suite (Pre-Caucasus). Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo – Oil Industry, (2), 8–11.
- Kerimov, V.Yu. , Mustaev, R.N., Etirmishli, G.D., & Yusubov, N.P. (2021). Influence of modern geodynamics on the structure and tectonics of the Black Sea–Caspian region. Eurasian Mining, 35(1), 3–8.
- Kerimov, V.Yu. , Serikova, U.S., Mustayev, R.N., & Guliyev, I.S. (2014). Deep oil-and-gas potential of the South Caspian Basin. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo – Oil Industry, (5), 50–54.
- Stouffer, K. , Pease, M., Tang, C., et al. (2023). Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security. National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.). [CrossRef]
- Frehn, J. (2024). AI-powered identity authentication is here: What you need to know. Portnox. Retrieved from https://www.portnox.com/blog/network-security/ai-powered-identity-authentication/.
- Cheshkov, A. , Zadorozhny, P., & Levichev, R. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT model for vulnerability detection. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07232.
- Steenhoek, B. , Rahman, M.M., Jiles, R., & Le, W. (2023). An empirical study of deep learning models for vulnerability detection. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 2237–2248). IEEE.
- Curran, K. , & Snodgrass, A. (2015). A novel cue-based picture-word-shape-character password creation scheme. International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 7(3), 37–59. [CrossRef]
- Cracknell, M.J. , Reading, A.M. (2014). Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information // Computers & Geosciences. 63 pp. 22-33.
- Rodriguez-Galiano, V.F. , et al. (2015). Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: An evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines // Ore Geology Reviews. 71 pp. 804-818. [CrossRef]
- Wang, G. , et al. (2019). Deep learning for geophysical inversion: A review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. 7(4). pp. 89-113.
- Silva, A.A. , Barbosa, V.C. (2020). Machine learning applied to lithological classification based on geophysical well logs. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 183. 104197.
- Zhang, S. , et al. (2021). Mineral prospectivity mapping using deep learning: A case study in the Qinling Orogenic Belt, China. Natural Resources Research.30(2), pp. 1597-1621.
- Chen, Y. , Cheng, Q. (2023). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in geosciences: Concepts, applications, and challenges. Earth-Science Reviews. 104050.
- Lary, D. J. , et al. (2016). Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing. Geoscience Frontiers. 7(1), pp. 3-10.







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).