Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

BT Inverse and the Generalized BT Inverse in a Ring

Submitted:

16 July 2025

Posted:

16 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
In this paper, we introduce and investigate the BT inverse for a ring element. The binary relation BT order has also been studied. Furthermore, we introduce the generalized BT inverse and present some presentations of this new generalized inverse. It also be characterized by using system of equations and Pierce decompositions of ring elements. Many properties of BT inverse for complex matrices are generalized to a broader context within a ring.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

An associative ring with an identity 1 is called a *-ring if there exists an involution : x x * satisfying ( x + y ) * = x * + y * , ( x y ) * = y * x * , ( x * ) * = x for all x , y R . An element a A has group inverse provided that there exists x A such that
x a 2 = a , a x 2 = x , a x = x a .
Such x is unique if exists, denoted by a # , and called the group inverse of a. As is well known, a square complex matrix A has group inverse if and only if r a n k ( A ) = r a n k ( A 2 ) (see [13]). An element a A has core inverse if there exists some x A such that
x a 2 = a , a x 2 = x , ( a x ) * = a x .
If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by Preprints 168292 i001. Let R ( X ) represent the range space of a complex matrix X. A square complex matrix A has core inverse Preprints 168292 i002 if and only if Preprints 168292 i003 is a projection and Preprints 168292 i004 (see [3,16]). Group and core inverses are extensively studied by many authors from very different points of view, e.g., [1,3,7,10,13,16].
An element a R has Moore-Penrose inverse if there exists x R such that
x a x = x , ( a x ) * = a x , ( x a ) * = x a , a x a = a .
The preceding x is unique if it exists, and we denote it by a . The set of all Moore-Penrose invertible elements in R is denoted by R . Evidently, every square complex matrix has the Moore-Penrose inverse. In [2], Baksalary and Trenkler extended core inverse and introduced a generalized core inverse. Recently, Ferreyra and Malik studied such generalized core inverse and call it the introduced BT inverse for a complex matrix. The matrix A = ( A P A ) is called the BT inverse of A. Many elementary properties of this new generalized inverse are established in [5]. For additional references on the BT inverse, we refer the reader to [6,8,9,17].
The motivation of this paper is to extend the proposed generalized inverse for complex matrices to a more general setting within a ring. We introduce the BT inverse for an element in a ring R. Furthermore, we establish and prove several fundamental properties of the BT inverse within this ring.
In Section 2, we introduce a new generalized inverse as the generalization of BT inverse of a complex matrix.
Definition 1. 
An element a R has BT inverse if there exists x i m ( a ) such that
x a x = x , ( a x ) * = a x , a x a 2 = a 2 , ( a * x a 2 ) * = a * x a 2 .
If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by a . The set of all BT invertible elements in R is denoted by R .
In [15], based on the Hartwig-Spindelbock decomposition of a complex matrix, Wang characterize the BT inverse of a complex matrix by using the system by equations. Replacing the Hartwig-Spindelbock decomposition, we employ the Pierce representation of a ring element as a tool to extend the characterization of BT inverse of a complex matrix to a broader context within a ring. We prove that a R has BT inverse if and only if a 2 a R . In this case, a = [ a 2 a ] . In Section 3, we investigate the order relation induced by BT inverse. Many characterizations of the BT order are obtained by using Pierce decomposition for a ring element.
Let
R q n i l = { x R 1 x r R is invertible for any r R , x r = r x } .
Let A be a Banach algebra. Evidently,
A q n i l = { x A lim n x n 1 n = 0 } = { x A 1 + λ x A is invertible for any λ C } .
Definition 2. 
An element a A has generalized BT inverse if there exist x , y A such that
a = x + y , x * y = x y * = 0 , x A , y A q n i l .
We denote x by a g and call it the generalized BT inverse of a. The set of all generalized BT invertible elements in A is denoted by A g .
Recall that an element a R has generalized Moore-Penrose inverse if there exists x R such that
x = x a x , ( a x ) * = a x , ( x a ) * = x a , a a x a R q n i l .
The preceding x is denoted by Preprints 168292 i012. The set of all generalized Moore-Penrose invertible elements in R is denoted by Preprints 168292 i013.
In Section 4, we prove that a A g if and only if Preprints 168292 i014. We further characterize the generalized BT inverse by using the system of equations.
Finally, in Section 5, we present certain characterizations of the generalized BT inverse for a geometrical point of view.
Throughout the paper, all rings are associative *-rings with an identity. R # , R and Preprints 168292 i013 denote the sets of all group invertible, More-Penrose invertible and generalized Moore-Penrose invertible elements in R, respectively. Let a R . Set i m ( a ) = { a x | x R } and k e r ( a ) = { x R | a x = 0 } . Let a R . Then p a = a a . We use p i m ( a ) , k e r ( b ) to denote the projection p such that i m ( p ) = i m ( a ) and k e r ( p ) = k e r ( b ) .

2. BT Inverse

The purpose of this section is to investigate the elementary properties of the BT inverse, which will be frequently utilized in subsequent sections. Our starting point is as follows.
Theorem 1. 
Let a R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a R .
(2)
a 2 a R .
In this case, a = a 2 a .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) By hypothesis, there exists x i m ( a ) such that x a x = x ,   ( a x ) * = a x ,   a x a 2 = a 2 ,   ( a * x a 2 ) * = a * x a 2 . Write x = a z for a z R . We directly verify that
x [ a 2 a ] = a z [ a 2 a ] = a a a z [ a 2 a ] = a a x [ a 2 a ] = [ a a ] * x [ a 2 a ] = [ a ] * [ a * x a 2 ] a , a 2 a x = a 2 a a z = a ( a a a ) z = a ( a z ) = a x , x [ a 2 a ] x = x ( a x ) = x a x = x , a 2 a x a 2 a = a x a 2 a = ( a x a 2 ) a = a 2 a .
Moreover, we see that
x ( a 2 a ) * = ( a ) * ( a * x a 2 ) a * = ( a ) * ( a * x a 2 ) * a = ( a ) * ( a * x a 2 ) a = x ( a 2 a ) , ( a 2 a ) x * = ( a x ) * = a x = ( a 2 a ) x .
Therefore a 2 a R and [ a 2 a ] = x . This implies that x is unique, as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Let x = ( a 2 a ) . Then
x = ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) = [ ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] * ( a 2 a ) = ( a a ) [ ( a 2 a ) a ] * ( a 2 a ) i m ( a ) .
We further check that
x a x = ( a 2 a ) a ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) a ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) a [ a a ] [ ( a 2 a ) a ] * ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) a [ a a ] 2 [ ( a 2 a ) a ] * ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) a 2 a ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) = x ,
a x = a ( a 2 a ) = a ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) = a [ a a ] ( a 2 a ) a * ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) , ( a x ) * = a x , a x a 2 = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a 2 = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a = ( a 2 a ) a = a 2 ,
a * x a 2 = a * ( a 2 a ) a 2 = a * ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a = a * ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a , ( a * x a 2 ) * = a * x a 2 .
Therefore x i m ( a ) is the solution of the system of equations:
x a x = x , ( a x ) * = a x , a x a 2 = a 2 , ( a * x a 2 ) * = a * x a 2 ,
as required. □
Corollary 1. 
Let Preprints 168292 i005. Then a R and Preprints 168292 i006.
Proof. 
In view of [16, Theorem 2.6], Preprints 168292 i007.
Then we have Preprints 168292 i008. It is easy to verify that
Preprints 168292 i009
Then Preprints 168292 i010 This implies that a 2 a R . In this case, Preprints 168292 i006. □
Let a R and p a = a a . Then we have
a 2 = a 3 a a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , a 3 = a 4 a a 3 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , ( a 2 ) = a a ( a 2 ) 0 ( 1 a a ) ( a 2 ) 0 p .
Lemma 1. 
Let a R . Then a 2 R and a = a ( a 2 ) .
Proof. 
It is easy to verify that
a 2 [ a ( a 2 a ) ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] , a ( a 2 a ) a 2 = a ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a , a 2 [ a ( a 2 a ) ] a 2 = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] a 2 = a 2 , a ( a 2 a ) a 2 a ( a 2 a ) = a ( a 2 a ) .
Moreover, we have
a 2 [ a ( a 2 a ) ] * = a 2 [ a ( a 2 a ) ] , [ a ( a 2 a ) ] a 2 * = [ a ( a 2 a ) ] a 2 .
Thus, a ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 ) .
In light of Theorem 2.1, we derive that
a = ( a 2 a ) = [ ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a a ) ] * ( a 2 a ) = ( a a ) * [ ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] = [ a a ] [ a 2 a ] = a [ a ( a 2 a ) ] = a ( a 2 ) ,
as asserted. □
We come now to establish the representation of the BT inverse by using certain projections.
Theorem 2. 
Let a R . Then a = p a a * ( a p a a * + 1 p a 2 ) 1 .
Proof. 
By virtue of Lemma 2.3, a 2 R . Further, we verify that
a p a a * + 1 p a 2 = a 2 a a * + 1 a 2 ( a 2 ) = [ a 2 a ] [ a a a * ] + 1 a a = [ a 2 a ] [ a a a * ] + 1 a [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * + 1 a ( a a ) [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * + 1 [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] A 1 .
Furthermore, we check that
a [ a p a a * + 1 p a 2 ] = a [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * + a [ 1 a a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] * = [ a ( a a ) ] * = a a a * = p a a * .
Therefore a = p a a * ( a p a a * + 1 p a 2 ) 1 .
Corollary 2. 
Let a R . The system given by
a x = a ( a p a ) , i m ( x ) i m ( p a a * )
is consistent and its unique solution is x = a .
Proof. 
Clearly, we have a a = a [ a 2 a ] = a ( a p a ) . In view of Theorem 2.4, a = p a a * ( a p a a * + 1 p a 2 ) 1 . Hence, a i m ( p a a * ) . We infer that i m ( a ) i m ( p a a * ) .
Suppose that
a x = a ( a p a ) , i m ( x ) i m ( p a a * )
for some x R . As p a a * = a ( a p a a * + 1 p a 2 ) , we write x = ( a p a ) ( z ) for some z R . Then
x = ( a p a ) z = ( a p a ) a p a ( a p a ) z = ( a p a ) a p a x = ( a p a ) ( a x ) = ( a p a ) [ a ( a p a ) ] = ( a p a ) ( a p a ) ( a p a ) ] = ( a p a ) = a ,
as required. □
Theorem 3. 
Let a R . The system given by
p a x = ( a p a ) , i m ( x ) i m ( a )
is consistent and its unique solution is x = a .
Proof. 
One easily checks that
p a a = a a [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] = ( a p a ) , a = [ a 2 a ] = a a [ a 2 a ] i m ( a ) .
Suppose that p a x i = ( a p a ) , i m ( x i ) i m ( a ) for i = 1 , 2 . Then p a x 1 = p a x 2 ; hence, x 1 x 2 k e r ( p a ) i m ( a ) = 0 . Therefore x 1 = x 2 , as asserted. □
Let a , b , c R . An element a has ( b , c ) -inverse provide that there exists x R such that
x a b = b , c a x = c a n d x b R x x R c .
If such x exists, it is unique and denote it by a ( b , c ) (see [4]).
Theorem 4. 
Let a R . Then a = a a a a * , a a a * .
Proof. 
Obviously, a R . Let x = a . We verify that
x = [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] = [ a a a * ] [ a 2 a ] * x [ a a a * ] R x , x = x [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = x [ a 2 a ] * [ a a a * ] x R [ a a a * ] , x a [ a a a * ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] a * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] a * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * a * = a [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = a [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a a a ] * = a ( [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a a a ] ) * * = a ( a a ) * ( [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] ) * * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] * = [ a ( a a ) ] * = a a a * , a a a * a x = a a a * a [ a 2 a ] = [ ( a a ) * a * ] [ a ( a a ) ] [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] * [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] * [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * = [ a 2 a ] * = a a a * .
Therefore a = a a a a * , a a a * , as asserted. □
Let a R and T , S R . We say that a has { 2 } -inverse x provided that x a x = x ,   i m ( a ) = T ,   k e r ( a ) = S . We denote x by a T , S ( 2 ) . We next consider the relation between the BT inverse and { 2 } -inverse in a ring. .
Theorem 5. 
Let a R . Then a = a i m a a a * , k e r ( a * ) 2 ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
Let x = a . Clearly, we have x = x a x .
Step 1. i m ( x ) = i m a a a * . In view of Theorem 2.1, we have
x = [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * [ a 2 a ] = [ a a a * ] [ a 2 a ] * [ a 2 a ] i m a a a * ,
[ a a a * ] * = a 2 a = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] x [ a 2 a ] = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * x * .
Hence, a a a * = x [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * i m ( x ) . Therefore i m ( x ) = i m a a a * .
Step 2. k e r ( x ) = k e r ( a * ) 2 . If ( a * ) 2 r = 0 for some r R , then
x r = [ a 2 a ] r = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] r = [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] [ a 2 a ] * r = [ a 2 a ] [ a [ a 2 a ] * ( a 2 ) * r = 0 .
Hence, r k e r ( x ) .
If x ( r ) = 0 , then
( a * ) 2 r = ( a 2 ) * r = [ ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ] * r = [ a 2 a a ] * [ ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] * r = [ a 2 a a ] * [ a 2 a ] ( x r ) = 0 .
Thus, r k e r ( a * ) 2 , as required.
Therefore we complete the proof. □

3. BT Order

This section is devoted to the BT order for two elements is a ring. Let a , b R and a R .
Definition 3. 
We say that a b if and only if a a = b a , a a = a b .
Let p = a a . Then we have
a = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , a = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p .
Moreover, we compute that
a = ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p .
Theorem 6. 
Let a R , b R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a b .
(2)
There exist x , y , z A such that a and b are represented by
a = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , b = a 2 a [ ( 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ) x + ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ] ( 1 a a ) y [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] z p ,
where p = a a .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Since a = ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p , we see that
a a = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p , a a = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p .
Write b = b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 p . Then
b a = b 1 ( a 2 a ) 0 b 3 ( a 2 a ) 0 p , a b = ( a 2 a ) b 1 ( a 2 a ) b 2 0 0 p .
By hypothesis, we have
( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) = b 1 ( a 2 a ) , b 3 ( a 2 a ) = 0 , ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) = ( a 2 a ) b 1 , ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) = ( a 2 a ) b 2 .
Hence, b 1 = [ ( a 2 a ) ] = a 2 a , b 3 = b 3 [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] , b 2 = [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] b 2 + ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) .
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Since a = ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p , we directly verify that
a a = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p = a 2 a [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] x + ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) y [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] z p ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p = b a , a a = ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p a 2 a [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] x + ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) y [ 1 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) ] z p = a b .
Therefore a b , as desired. □
Corollary 3. 
Let a R , b R and a a a = a . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a b .
(2)
There exists z A such that a and b are represented by
a = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , b = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p ,
where p = a a .
(3)
a a = b a , a 2 = b a .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) This is obvious by Theorem 3.2.
( 2 ) ( 3 ) By hypothesis, we have a a a = a ; hence, a ( a 2 a ) a = a . This implies that ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a = a . Since a = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p , we verify that
a a = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = a ( a ) 2 a 2 a a ( a ) 2 a ( 1 a a ) ( 1 a a ) a a 2 a ( 1 a a ) a a ( 1 a a ) p = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p a 2 a ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p = a b , a 2 = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p 2 = ( a 2 a ) 2 a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = a 2 a ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = b a ,
as desired.
( 3 ) ( 1 ) Write b = b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 p . By hypothesis, we have
a a = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = a ( a ) 2 a 2 a a ( a ) 2 a ( 1 a a ) ( 1 a a ) a a 2 a ( 1 a a ) a a ( 1 a a ) p = a ( a ) 2 b 1 a ( a ) 2 b 2 ( 1 a a ) a b 1 ( 1 a a ) a b 2 p = a ( a ) 2 0 ( 1 a a ) a 0 p b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 p = a b , a 2 = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p 2 = ( a 2 a ) 2 a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = b a .
Hence,
a ( a ) 2 b 2 = a ( a ) 2 a ( 1 a a ) , ( 1 a a ) a b 2 = ( 1 a a ) a a ( 1 a a ) .
This implies that a b 2 = a ( a ) 2 a ( 1 a a ) + ( 1 a a ) a a ( 1 a a ) ; and then
b 2 = a a b 2 = a 2 ( a ) 2 a ( 1 a a ) + a ( 1 a a ) a a ( 1 a a ) = [ a 2 ( a ) 2 + a ( 1 a a ) a ] a ( 1 a a ) = a a a ( 1 a a ) = a ( 1 a a ) .
Since b 3 a 2 a = 0 , we deduce that b 3 ( a 2 a ) ( a 2 a ) a = 0 . This implies that b 3 a = 0 , and so b 3 = ( b 3 a ) a = 0 .
Moreover, we have
a ( a ) 2 b 1 = a ( a ) 2 a 2 a , ( 1 a a ) a b 1 = ( 1 a a ) a a 2 a .
Hence a b 1 = a ( a ) 2 a 2 a + ( 1 a a ) a a 2 a ; and so
b 1 = a a b 1 = a 2 ( a ) 2 a 2 a + a ( 1 a a ) a a 2 a = a a a 2 a = a 2 a .
Therefore b = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 b 4 p , as required. □
Corollary 4. 
Let a R , b R and a a a = a . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a b .
(2)
b a ( 1 a a ) R ( 1 a a ) .
(3)
b a ( 1 a a ) R ( 1 a a ) .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Corollary 3.3,
b a = 0 0 0 z p ,
where p = a a . Thus, b a ( 1 p ) R ( 1 p ) , as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) In view of Theorem 3.2, a = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p . Set c = b a . Then c ( 1 p ) R ( 1 p ) , and so
b = a + c = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 c p .
By using Corollary 3.3, a b .
( 1 ) ( 3 ) By hypothesis, we have
a a = b a , a a = a b .
Hence, ( b a ) a a = 0 , a a ( b a ) = 0 . Thus b a = ( 1 a a ) ( b a ) ( 1 a a ) , as required.
( 3 ) ( 1 ) Since b a ( 1 a a ) R ( 1 a a ) and a a a = a , we derive that a a = b a ,   a a = a b , as desired. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 7. 
Let a R ,   b R ,   a a a = a ,   a b = b a and a b . If a 2 R , then a 2 b 2 .
Proof. 
In view of Theorem 3.2, we have
a = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , b = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p ,
where p = a a . Since a b = b a , we see that
a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p = a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 z p a 2 a a ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p .
This implies that a z = a ( 1 a a ) z = 0 .
In view of Lemma 2.3, a a = a 2 ( a 2 ) . Therefore
( a 2 ) = [ a 4 ( a 2 ) ] = [ a 3 a ] = [ a 4 a a 3 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p ( a 2 a ) 0 0 0 p ] = [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p .
By hypothesis, we compute that
a 2 ( a 2 ) = a 3 a a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p = a 3 a [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p , b 2 ( a 2 ) = a 3 a a 2 ( 1 a a ) + a z 0 z 2 p [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p = a 3 a [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p ,
( a 2 ) a 2 = [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p a 3 a a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p = [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a 3 a [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p , ( a 2 ) b 2 = [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] 0 0 0 p a 3 a a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 z 2 p = [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a 3 a [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a 2 ( 1 a a ) 0 0 p .
Therefore
a 2 ( a 2 ) = b 2 ( a 2 ) , ( a 2 ) a 2 = ( a 2 ) b 2 .
Accordingly, a 2 b 2 . □
Corollary 5. 
Let a R R # ,   b R and a b . If a 2 b 2 if and only if a b = b a .
Proof. 
⟸ Since a 2 b 2 , as in the proof in Theorem 3.5, we deduce that
[ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a z = 0 ;
hence, [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] a z = 0 . This implies that
( a z ) * [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] [ a 4 a ( a 2 a ) ] ] = 0 .
It follows that ( a z ) * [ a 4 a ] = 0 . Thus ( a z ) * a 4 = 0 . Since a R # , we have ( a z ) * a = 0 ; whence, a * a z = 0 . Thus a ( 1 a a ) z = a z = a a a z = ( a a ) * a z = ( a ) * ( a * a z ) = 0 . Accordingly, a b = b a , as required.
⟸ This is proved in Theorem 3.5. □

4. Generalized BT Inverse

The aim of this section is to introduce the notion of the generalized BT inverse in a ring. For further use, we formally establish the following lemma:
Lemma 2. 
Let a R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a Preprints 168292 i013.
(2)
There exist x , y R such that
a = x + y , x * y = y x * = 0 , x R , y R q n i l .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) By hypotheses, there exists z R such that
z = z a z , ( a z ) * = a z , ( z a ) * = z a ,   a a z a R q n i l .
Set x = a z a and y = a a z a . Then a = x + y . We claim that x has Moore-Penrose inverse. Evidently, we verify that
x z x = ( a z a ) z ( a z a ) = a ( z a z ) a z a = a ( z a z ) a = a z a = x , z x z = z ( a z a ) z = z a ( z a z ) = z a z = z , x z = a z a z = a z , z x = z a z a = z a , ( x z ) * = ( a z ) * = a z = x z , ( z x ) * = ( z a ) * = z a = z x .
Therefore x R and z = x .
Moreover, we see that
x * y = ( a z a ) * ( 1 a z ) a = a * ( a z ) * ( 1 a z ) a = a * ( a z ) * ( 1 a z ) a = 0 .
Since ( z a ) * = z a , we have
y x * = ( a a z a ) ( a z a ) * = a ( 1 z a ) ( a z a ) * = a [ ( 1 z a ) ] * ( a z a ) * = a [ ( a z a ) ( 1 z a ) ] * = 0 .
By hypothesis, we get y = a a z a R q n i l . Therefore there exists the Moore-Penrose decomposition a = x + y , as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, there exist z , y R such that
a = z + y , z * y = y z * = 0 , z R , y R q n i l .
Set x = z . One easily checks that
x y = z ( z z ) y = z ( z z ) * y = z ( z ) * ( z * y ) = 0 , x a = z z + x y = z z , x a x = z z z = z = x ,
Moreover, we check that
y z = y z z z = y [ z z ] z = ( y z * ) [ z ) * z = 0 ,
and then a x = ( z + y ) z = z z + y z = z z . Then
( a x ) * = ( z z ) * = z z = a x , ( x a ) * = ( z z ) * = z z = x a .
Since y z = 0 , we see that
a a x a = a ( 1 x a ) = ( y + z ) ( 1 z z ) = y ( 1 z z ) = y R q n i l .
Therefore Preprints 168292 i012  = x = z , as asserted. □
Theorem 8. 
Let a R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a R g .
(2)
Preprints 168292 i015
In this case, a g = [ a 2 a ] .
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Since a R g , there exist x , y R such that
a = x + y , x * y = x y * = 0 , x R , y R q n i l .
Clearly, x R . In light of Lemma 4.1, a Preprints 168292 i013 and Preprints 168292 i012 = x . It is easy to verify that
Preprints 168292 i016
Moreover, we check that Preprints 168292 i011 as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Since a Preprints 168292 i013, by virtue of Lemma 4.1, there exist x , y R such that
a = x + y , x * y = y x = 0 , x R , y R q n i l .
In this case, Preprints 168292 i012 = x . Moreover, we have Preprints 168292 i017 Therefore x R . Accordingly, a R g . □
As an immediate consequence, we derive
Corollary 6. 
Let a R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a R g .
(2)
The system of conditions
x = x a x , ( a x ) * = a x , ( x a ) * = x a , a 2 x R , a a x a R q n i l
is consistent and it has the unique solution.
In this case, a g = ( a 2 x ) .
Corollary 7. 
Let a , b R g . If a b = b a = 0 ,   a * b = 0 , then a + b R g . In this case,
( a + b ) g = a g + b g .
Proof. 
Since a , b R g , it follows by Theorem 4.2 that Preprints 168292 i018 and
Preprints 168292 i019
Since a b = b a = 0 ,   a * b = b * a = 0 , we verify that Preprints 168292 i020 It is easy to verify that
Preprints 168292 i021
By hypothesis, we verify that
Preprints 168292 i022
In light of Theorem 4.2,
Preprints 168292 i023
as asserted. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 9. 
Let a R . Then a R g if and only if
(1)
a Preprints 168292 i013;.
(2)
there exists Preprints 168292 i024 such that
Preprints 168292 i025
In this case, a g = x .
Proof. 
⟹ Let Preprints 168292 i026 We verify that
Preprints 168292 i027
Furthermore, we have
Preprints 168292 i028
as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists Preprints 168292 i029 such that
Preprints 168292 i030
Write Preprints 168292 i031 Then we check that
Preprints 168292 i032
Moreover, we see that
Preprints 168292 i033
Therefore Preprints 168292 i034 This completes the proof. □
Corollary 8. 
Let a R . Then a R if and only if a R R g . In this case, a = a g .
Proof. 
⟹ This is obvious.
⟸ Since a R , we have Preprints 168292 i012 = a . In view of Theorem 4.5, there exists Preprints 168292 i024 such that
Preprints 168292 i035
Hence,
Preprints 168292 i036
Therefore a R . In this case, a = x = a g , as asserted. □

5. Characterizations of the Generalized BT-Inverse

The main purpose of this section is to provide new properties of the generalized BT-inverse in a ring. Consider the system given by
Preprints 168292 i037
Lemma 3. 
If the system ( 5.1 ) of equations has a solution, then it is unique.
Proof. 
Assume that x 1 , x 2 satisfy ( 2.1 ) . Then
Preprints 168292 i038
for i = 1 , 2 . Therefore
Preprints 168292 i039
as desired. □
Theorem 10. 
Let a , x R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a g = x .
(2)
The system ( 5.1 ) of equations is consistent and it has the unique solution x.
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Taking x = a g . In view of Theorem 4.2, Preprints 168292 i040 Then
Preprints 168292 i041
By virtue of Lemma 5.1, x is the unique solution of the preceding equations, as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By the argument above, we have Preprints 168292 i042 Therefore a g = x by Theorem 4.2. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 11. 
Let a , x R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a g = x .
(2)
Preprints 168292 i043
(3)
Preprints 168292 i044
(4)
Preprints 168292 i045
(5)
Preprints 168292 i046
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 5.2, Preprints 168292 i047 We verify that
Preprints 168292 i048
as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Write x = ( a p a ) * z for a z R . Then
Preprints 168292 i049
as required.
( 1 ) ( 3 ) In view of Theorem 4.2, Preprints 168292 i050 Then we easily check that Preprints 168292 i051Preprints 168292 i052
( 3 ) ( 1 ) Write Preprints 168292 i053 for a z R . Then
Preprints 168292 i054
By virtue of Theorem Theorem 4.2, a g = x , as desired.
( 1 ) ( 4 ) Obviously, Preprints 168292 i055 If z k e r ( p a a * ) , then ( a p a ) * z = 0 . Hence, Preprints 168292 i056Preprints 168292 i057 Thus z k e r ( x ) . That is, k e r ( p a a * ) k e r ( x ) , as desired.
( 4 ) ( 5 ) We directly verify that k e r ( a 2 ) * k e r ( p a a * ) , as required.
( 5 ) ( 1 ) As Preprints 168292 i058 we get ( a p a ) ( a p a ) a 2 = ( a p a ) ( a p a ) ( a p a a ) = a p a a = a 2 . Hence, ( a 2 ) * [ 1 ( a p a ) ( a p a ) ] = 0 . Since k e r ( a 2 ) * k e r ( x ) , we have x [ 1 ( a p a ) ( a p a ) ] = 0 . Therefore
Preprints 168292 i059
Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 4.2. □
Corollary 9. 
Let a , x R . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a g = x .
(2)
Preprints 168292 i060
Proof.  ( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 5.1, x a x = x . Moreover, we have
Preprints 168292 i061
It is easy to verify that
Preprints 168292 i062
Hence, i m ( x ) = i m ( a p a ) * . Obviously, Preprints 168292 i063. Thus, we have
Preprints 168292 i064
as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, Preprints 168292 i065 Then a x = p a p a = a p a ( a p a ) = Preprints 168292 i066 Moreover, we have Preprints 168292 i067 i m ( a p a ) * . According to Theorem 5.3, we complete the proof. □
Theorem 12. 
Let a R . Then a g = a i m ( a p a ) * , k e r ( a p a ) * ( 2 ) = a i m ( a p a ) * , k e r ( a 2 ) * ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
Set x = a g . In view of Theorem 5.2, we have x = x a x .
Step 1. i m ( x ) = i m ( a p a ) * . In view of Theorem 4.2, we have
Preprints 168292 i068
Accordingly, we have i m ( x ) = i m ( a p a ) * .
Step 2. k e r ( x ) = k e r ( a p a ) * . If ( a p a ) * r = 0 for some r R , then
Preprints 168292 i069
Thus r k e r ( x ) .
If x ( r ) = 0 , then
Preprints 168292 i070
Thus, r ( a p a ) * . As a result, we have k e r ( x ) = k e r ( a p a ) * .
Therefore x = a i m ( a p a ) * , k e r ( a p a ) * ( 2 ) . By the similar way, we check that x = a i m ( a p a ) * , k e r ( a 2 ) * ( 2 ) . This completes the proof. □

References

  1. O.M. Baksalary and G. Trenkler, Core inverse of matrices, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 58(2010), 681–697. [CrossRef]
  2. O.M. Baksalary and G. Trenkler, On a generalized core inverse, Applied Math. Comput., 236(2014), 450–457. [CrossRef]
  3. J. Chen; H. Zhu; P. Patricio and Y. Zhang, Characterizations and representations of core and dual core inverses, Canad. Math. Bull., 2016. [CrossRef]
  4. M.P. Drazin, A class of outer generalized inverses, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 436 (2012), 1909–1923. [CrossRef]
  5. D.E. Ferreyra and S.B. Malik, The BT inverse, In book: Generalized Inverses: Algoritms and Applications, Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, 2021.
  6. D.E. Ferreyra; N. Thome and C. Torigino, The W-weighted BT inverse, Quest. Math., 46(2023), 359–374. [CrossRef]
  7. T. Li and J. Chen, Characterizations of core and dual core inverses in rings with involution, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 66(2018), 717–730. [CrossRef]
  8. W, Jiang and K. Zuo, Revisiting of the BT-inverse of matrices, AIMS Math., 6(2021), 2607–2622. [CrossRef]
  9. A. Kara; N. Thome and D.S. Djordjević, Simultaneous extension of generalized BT-inverses and core-EP inverses, Filomat, 38(2024), 10605–10614.
  10. N. Mihajlovic, Group inverse and core inverse in Banach and C*-algebras, Comm. Algebra, 48(2020), 1803–1818. [CrossRef]
  11. D. Mosić, Weighted generalized Moore-Penrose inverse, Georgian Math. J., 30(2023), 919–932.
  12. K.S. Stojanović and D. Mosić, Generalization of the Moore-Penrose inverse, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat., 114(2020), No. 4, Paper No. 196, 16 p.
  13. D.S Rakic; N.C. Dincic and D.S. Djordjevic, Group, Moore-Penrose, core and dual core inverse in rings with involution, Linear Algebra Appl., 463(2014), 115–133. [CrossRef]
  14. H. Wang, Core-EP Decomposition and its applications, Linear Algebra Appl., 508(2016), 289–300. [CrossRef]
  15. H. Wang, Some new characterizations of generalized inverses, Front. Math., 18(2023), 1397–1402. [CrossRef]
  16. S. Xu; J. Chen and X. Zhang, New characterizations for core inverses in rings with involution, Front. Math., 2017. [CrossRef]
  17. S. Xu and D. Wang, New characterizations of the generalized B-T inverse, Filomat, 36(2022), 945–950.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated