Submitted:
06 July 2025
Posted:
07 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Problem Statement
1.3. Research Objectives
- To develop an attention-enriched DeepFM model that effectively captures both low-order and high-order interactions among features, specifically tailored for sparse data scenarios. This model aims to leverage attention mechanisms to enhance feature relevance and contextual understanding in predictions.
- To integrate curriculum meta-learning techniques into the training process, facilitating a structured learning approach that allows the model to adapt rapidly to new tasks and datasets while maintaining high predictive performance.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model against traditional predictive modeling techniques and benchmark models, utilizing real-world datasets characterized by sparsity. Performance metrics will include accuracy, precision, recall, and interpretability.
- To explore the implications of the findings for practitioners in various domains, particularly in understanding how the proposed model can be utilized to improve decision-making processes in environments with limited data.
1.4. Significance of the Study
1.5. Research Questions
- How does the integration of attention mechanisms within DeepFM models enhance predictive accuracy in sparse data scenarios compared to traditional models?
- In what ways do curriculum meta-learning techniques improve the adaptability and efficiency of the attention-enriched DeepFM model in handling diverse datasets?
- What insights can be gained from the attention mechanisms regarding feature relevance, and how do these insights contribute to the interpretability of the model’s predictions in sparse data contexts?
1.6. Structure of the Thesis
- Chapter 2: Literature Review: This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of existing research related to predictive modeling, attention mechanisms, DeepFM, curriculum learning, and meta-learning. It highlights the strengths and limitations of current approaches and identifies gaps in the literature that this study aims to address.
- Chapter 3: Methodology: This chapter outlines the methodological framework employed in the development of the attention-enriched DeepFM model. It details the data collection process, model architecture, training procedures, and evaluation metrics.
- Chapter 4: Results: This chapter presents the results of the experimental evaluation, comparing the performance of the proposed model to traditional DeepFM implementations and other state-of-the-art predictive models. It includes a detailed analysis of predictive accuracy, precision, recall, and interpretability.
- Chapter 5: Discussion: This chapter discusses the implications of the findings, addressing the significance of the attention mechanism and curriculum meta-learning in enhancing predictive performance. It explores the limitations of the study and proposes future research directions.
- Chapter 6: Conclusion: This final chapter summarizes the key findings of the research, reiterates its contributions to the field, and outlines recommendations for practitioners and future research avenues.
1.7. Conclusion
2. Literature Review
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Sparse Data Scenarios
2.2.1. Definition and Challenges
- Overfitting: Models trained on sparse datasets often exhibit high variance, leading to overfitting and poor generalization to unseen data.
- Lack of Interpretability: Traditional models may struggle to provide meaningful insights into feature importance, complicating decision-making processes.
- Computational Efficiency: Sparse datasets can lead to inefficiencies in model training and evaluation, requiring advanced techniques to optimize performance.
2.2.2. Importance of Effective Predictive Modeling
2.3. Curriculum Meta-Learning
2.3.1. Overview of Meta-Learning
2.3.2. Curriculum Learning
2.3.3. Curriculum Meta-Learning
2.4. Attention Mechanisms
2.4.1. The Concept of Attention
2.4.2. Types of Attention Mechanisms
- Soft Attention: Assigns continuous weights to all input features, allowing the model to consider multiple elements simultaneously.
- Hard Attention: Focuses on specific features, leading to more binary decision-making.
- Self-Attention: Weighs different elements of the same input sequence, effectively capturing long-range dependencies.
2.4.3. Attention in Deep Learning
2.5. Deep Factorization Machines (DeepFM)
2.5.1. Overview of Factorization Machines
2.5.2. Deep Factorization Machines
- Factorization Machine Component: This component models low-order interactions through matrix factorization.
- Deep Learning Component: Multiple fully connected layers learn high-order interactions, enhancing the model’s ability to capture complex relationships.
2.5.3. Applications of DeepFM in Sparse Data
2.6. Integration of Curriculum Meta-Learning and Attention-Enriched DeepFM
2.6.1. Synergistic Benefits
2.6.2. Empirical Evidence
2.7. Gaps in the Literature
- Limited Exploration of Combined Approaches: While both CML and attention mechanisms have been studied independently, their integration within predictive modeling frameworks, particularly for sparse data, remains underexplored.
- Empirical Validation: There is a lack of empirical studies validating the effectiveness of the integrated approach across diverse real-world applications.
- Interpretability Challenges: Although attention mechanisms enhance interpretability, further research is needed to elucidate how curriculum learning influences model decisions and feature importance.
2.8. Conclusion
3. Methodology
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Model Architecture
3.2.1. Overview of DeepFM
- Factorization Machine Component: This component models pairwise feature interactions using matrix factorization techniques. It effectively handles the sparsity often found in datasets, making it an ideal choice for applications such as recommendation systems and user behavior prediction.
- Deep Learning Component: This component comprises multiple fully connected layers that capture complex, nonlinear relationships among features. By integrating deep learning, DeepFM enhances its capacity to learn intricate patterns in user interactions, further improving predictive performance.
3.2.2. Attention-Enriched DeepFM
- Attention Mechanism: This mechanism assigns varying weights to different features based on their relevance to the prediction task. By dynamically focusing on significant features, the model can effectively reduce noise from irrelevant data, thus enhancing prediction accuracy.
- Feature Selection: The attention mechanism allows the model to discern which features most significantly influence predictions, thereby improving interpretability. This insight is particularly valuable for stakeholders seeking to understand the factors driving user behavior.
3.3. Curriculum Meta-Learning
3.3.1. Concept of Curriculum Learning
3.3.2. Implementation of Curriculum Learning
- Task Design: The tasks are designed based on the complexity of the underlying data. Initial tasks involve simpler patterns with abundant examples, while subsequent tasks introduce more complex interactions that are less frequent in the dataset.
- Progressive Learning: The model is trained iteratively, starting with the simplest tasks and gradually advancing to more complex ones. This progressive exposure ensures that the model develops a robust understanding of the feature space.
- Performance Monitoring: During training, the model’s performance is continuously monitored to determine when it is ready to transition to more complex tasks. This adaptive learning process enhances the model’s ability to generalize across diverse scenarios.
3.4. Data Collection
3.4.1. Dataset Selection
- E-Commerce Transaction Dataset: This dataset consists of user transaction records from an online retail platform, capturing user interactions and purchase behavior.
- Movie Recommendation Dataset: This dataset contains user ratings for a wide variety of movies, allowing for the analysis of user preferences in a collaborative filtering context.
- User Engagement Logs: This dataset provides insights into user interactions with various online content, including clicks, views, and shares, offering a rich source of data for understanding user behavior.
3.4.2. Data Preprocessing
- Data Cleaning: Missing values are addressed using imputation techniques, and outliers are identified and removed to maintain the integrity of the dataset.
- Feature Engineering: Relevant features are extracted and transformed. Categorical variables are encoded using techniques such as one-hot encoding or embeddings, while continuous variables are normalized to ensure consistent scaling.
- Train-Test Split: Each dataset is divided into training and testing subsets, typically with an 80-20 split, to facilitate robust evaluation of model performance.
3.5. Experimental Design
3.5.1. Environment Setup
- Hardware Specifications: The model training was performed on NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate computation, particularly beneficial for deep learning components.
- Software Tools: Jupyter Notebooks were employed for iterative development and experimentation, providing an interactive platform for model training and evaluation.
3.5.2. Baseline Models
- Traditional DeepFM: The standard version of DeepFM without attention mechanisms serves as a primary benchmark.
- Factorization Machines (FM): This simpler model captures only low-order interactions, providing a comparison against the more complex architectures.
- Other State-of-the-Art Models: Models such as Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) and neural collaborative filtering were included to provide a comprehensive performance comparison.
3.6. Implementation of Attention Mechanisms
3.6.1. Feature Attention Layer
- Attention Layer: An attention layer is added to the DeepFM architecture, allowing the model to calculate attention scores for each feature based on learned representations.
- Weight Assignment: The attention scores are normalized to yield weights that reflect the importance of each feature, allowing the model to prioritize significant predictors during training and prediction.
3.6.2. Contextual Attention Mechanism
- Contextual Inputs: User-specific contextual features, such as demographic information and historical behavior, are incorporated into the model.
- Attention Calculation: The model calculates attention scores based on these contextual features, dynamically adjusting the contribution of each user context to the final predictions.
3.7. Performance Evaluation Metrics
- Accuracy: The proportion of correct predictions relative to the total predictions made by the model.
- Precision and Recall: These metrics evaluate the model’s ability to correctly identify positive instances, particularly important in imbalanced datasets.
- F1-Score: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single measure that balances both concerns.
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): These metrics are utilized for regression tasks to measure the average prediction error.
3.8. Validation Process
3.8.1. Cross-Validation
3.8.2. Statistical Significance Testing
3.9. Conclusion
4. Methodology
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Research Design
4.2.1. Type of Study
4.2.2. Research Questions
- How does the integration of Curriculum Meta-Learning enhance the adaptability of the Attention-Enriched DeepFM model in sparse data scenarios?
- In what ways do attention mechanisms improve the model’s ability to focus on relevant features in high-dimensional, sparse datasets?
- What is the impact of the proposed framework on predictive accuracy and interpretability compared to traditional predictive modeling approaches?
4.3. Data Collection
4.3.1. Dataset Selection
- E-Commerce Transaction Dataset: This dataset includes user transactions, product views, and ratings, capturing the complexities of consumer behavior in an online shopping environment.
- MovieLens Dataset: A well-known dataset containing user ratings for movies, which is commonly used for collaborative filtering tasks.
- Online Retail Dataset: This dataset encompasses transaction records from an online retail store, providing insights into purchasing patterns and product interactions.
4.3.2. Data Preprocessing
- Data Cleaning: Missing values were addressed using appropriate imputation techniques, while outliers were detected and managed to ensure data integrity.
- Feature Engineering: Relevant features were extracted and transformed. Categorical variables were encoded through one-hot encoding or embedding techniques, while continuous variables were normalized to maintain consistent scaling.
- Sparse Data Handling: In scenarios characterized by sparsity, techniques such as dimensionality reduction (e.g., Principal Component Analysis) were employed to mitigate the effects of high dimensionality on model performance.
- Train-Test Split: Each dataset was partitioned into training and testing subsets, typically using an 80-20 split, to facilitate robust evaluations of model performance.
4.4. Model Architecture
4.4.1. Overview of DeepFM
- Factorization Machine Component: This component models pairwise interactions between features using matrix factorization techniques, making it suitable for high-dimensional sparse data.
- Deep Learning Component: The deep learning layer comprises several fully connected neural network layers that learn complex, nonlinear interactions among features, enhancing the model’s capacity to capture intricate patterns in user behavior.
4.4.2. Integration of Attention Mechanisms
- Feature Attention Layer: This layer computes attention scores for each feature based on its relevance to the prediction task. By assigning weights to features, the model can prioritize significant predictors while reducing the impact of irrelevant noise.
- Contextual Attention Layer: This component considers user-specific contextual information, such as browsing history and demographics, allowing the model to adapt its predictions based on individual user contexts. This dual-layer attention mechanism improves the model’s ability to discern meaningful patterns in sparse datasets.
4.4.3. Curriculum Meta-Learning Framework
- Task Sequencing: The model is trained on a sequence of tasks that gradually increase in complexity. This structured exposure allows the model to build foundational knowledge before tackling more challenging scenarios, enhancing generalization capabilities.
- Meta-Training and Meta-Testing: During the meta-training phase, the model learns to adapt to new tasks based on previous experiences. The meta-testing phase evaluates the model’s ability to generalize to unseen tasks, providing insights into its adaptability and performance.
4.5. Experimental Design
4.5.1. Environment Configuration
4.5.2. Baseline Models
- Traditional DeepFM: The standard DeepFM model without attention mechanisms serves as the primary benchmark.
- Factorization Machines (FM): A simpler model that captures only low-order interactions, providing a comparison against the more complex architectures.
- Collaborative Filtering Models: Models such as user-based and item-based collaborative filtering were included to provide a comprehensive performance comparison.
4.5.3. Evaluation Metrics
- Accuracy: The proportion of correct predictions relative to the total predictions made by the model.
- Precision and Recall: These metrics evaluate the model’s ability to correctly identify positive instances, essential in imbalanced datasets.
- F1-Score: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single measure that balances both concerns.
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): Metrics utilized for regression tasks to measure the average prediction error.
4.6. Validation Process
4.6.1. Cross-Validation
4.6.2. Statistical Significance Testing
4.7. Implementation
4.7.1. Software and Tools
4.7.2. Experimental Setup
4.8. Limitations of the Methodology
- Dataset Constraints: The reliance on specific datasets may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future studies should validate the model across a broader range of datasets to ensure robustness.
- Complexity of Implementation: The integration of curriculum meta-learning and attention mechanisms can introduce complexity in model training and deployment. Organizations may require specialized expertise to implement and maintain these advanced models effectively.
- Dependence on Data Quality: The success of the model hinges on the quality of the input data. Poor-quality data can adversely affect performance, necessitating robust data governance practices.
4.9. Conclusion
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Summary of Key Findings
5.2.1. Enhanced Predictive Accuracy
5.2.2. Attention Mechanisms for Feature Relevance
5.2.3. Robustness in Sparse Data Scenarios
5.2.4. Interpretability and Actionable Insights
5.3. Implications for Practice
5.3.1. Adoption of Advanced Predictive Models
5.3.2. Focus on Interpretability
5.3.3. Continuous Learning and Adaptation
5.3.4. Collaboration Between Data Scientists and Domain Experts
5.4. Limitations of the Study
5.4.1. Dataset Limitations
5.4.2. Complexity of Implementation
5.4.3. Dependence on Data Quality
5.5. Future Research Directions
5.5.1. Exploration of Hybrid Models
5.5.2. Enhancing Interpretability Techniques
5.5.3. Real-World Applications
5.5.4. Addressing Ethical Considerations
5.6. Conclusion
6. Conclusion and Future Directions
6.1. Summary of Findings
6.1.1. Curriculum Meta-Learning
6.1.2. Attention-Enriched DeepFM
6.1.3. Empirical Validation
6.2. Implications for Practice
6.2.1. Recommendations for Implementation
- Adoption of CML Frameworks: E-commerce platforms and other data-driven organizations should adopt Curriculum Meta-Learning frameworks to enhance their predictive modeling capabilities. This structured approach can lead to improved generalization and adaptability in dynamic environments.
- Incorporation of Attention Mechanisms: The integration of attention mechanisms within predictive models can significantly improve performance in sparse data scenarios. Organizations should invest in developing or adopting models that leverage this technology to focus on relevant features.
- Continuous Model Evaluation: Given the dynamic nature of data and user behavior, organizations should establish processes for continuous evaluation and updating of their predictive models. Regularly retraining models with new data can help maintain accuracy and relevance.
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaboration between data scientists, domain experts, and business strategists is essential to maximize the effectiveness of the predictive modeling framework. Insights from multiple disciplines can inform feature selection and model interpretation.
6.3. Limitations of the Study
6.3.1. Generalizability of Results
6.3.2. Complexity of Implementation
6.3.3. Dependence on Data Quality
6.4. Future Research Directions
6.4.1. Exploration of Hybrid Models
6.4.2. Enhancing Interpretability Measures
6.4.3. Real-Time Adaptation Strategies
6.4.4. Comparative Studies with Emerging Techniques
6.4.5. Integration of External Contextual Factors
6.5. Conclusion
References
- Huang, S., Xi, K., Bi, X., Fan, Y., & Shi, G. (2024, November). Hybrid DeepFM Model with Attention and Meta-Learning for Enhanced Product Usage Prediction. In 2024 4th International Conference on Digital Society and Intelligent Systems (DSInS) (pp. 267-271). IEEE.
- Wang, S., Yang, Q., Ruan, S., Long, C., Yuan, Y., Li, Q., ... & Zheng, Y. (2024). Spatial Meta Learning With Comprehensive Prior Knowledge Injection for Service Time Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
- Wang, C., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Zang, T., Yu, J., & Tang, F. (2022). Deep meta-learning in recommendation systems: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04415.
- Xia, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Sheng, X., & Liang, K. (2025). Meta Domain Adaptation Approach for Multi-domain Ranking. IEEE Access.
- Yue, W., Hu, H., Wan, X., Chen, X., & Gui, W. (2025). A Domain Knowledge-Supervised Framework Based on Deep Probabilistic Generation Network for Enhancing Industrial Soft-sensing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
- Zhao, X., Wang, M., Zhao, X., Li, J., Zhou, S., Yin, D., ... & Guo, R. (2023). Embedding in recommender systems: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18608.
- Li, C., Ishak, I., Ibrahim, H., Zolkepli, M., Sidi, F., & Li, C. (2023). Deep learning-based recommendation system: systematic review and classification. IEEE Access, 11, 113790-113835.
- Rajabi, F., & He, J. S. (2021). Click-through rate prediction using graph neural networks and online learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03811.
- Bai, J., Geng, X., Deng, J., Xia, Z., Jiang, H., Yan, G., & Liang, J. (2025). A comprehensive survey on advertising click-through rate prediction algorithm. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 40, e3.
- Gharibshah, Z., & Zhu, X. (2021). User response prediction in online advertising. aCM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(3), 1-43.
- Wen, H., Lin, Y., Wu, L., Mao, X., Cai, T., Hou, Y., ... & Wan, H. (2024). A survey on service route and time prediction in instant delivery: Taxonomy, progress, and prospects. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
- Wang, Y., Yin, H., Wu, L., Chen, T., & Liu, C. (2021). Secure your ride: Real-time matching success rate prediction for passenger-driver pairs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
- Pan, X., & Gan, M. (2023). Multi-behavior recommendation based on intent learning. Multimedia Systems, 29(6), 3655-3668.
- Chen, B., Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Guo, H., & Tang, R. (2024). A comprehensive survey on automated machine learning for recommendations. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems, 2(2), 1-38.
- Zhu, G., Cao, J., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Bu, Z., Yang, S., ... & Wang, Z. (2023). A multi-task graph neural network with variational graph auto-encoders for session-based travel packages recommendation. ACM Transactions on the Web, 17(3), 1-30.
- Li, C. T., Tsai, Y. C., Chen, C. Y., & Liao, J. C. (2024). Graph neural networks for tabular data learning: A survey with taxonomy and directions. ACM Computing Surveys.
- Xu, L., Zhang, J., Li, B., Wang, J., Chen, S., Zhao, W. X., & Wen, J. R. (2025). Tapping the potential of large language models as recommender systems: A comprehensive framework and empirical analysis. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 19(5), 1-51.
- Yao, J., Zhang, S., Yao, Y., Wang, F., Ma, J., Zhang, J., ... & Yang, H. (2022). Edge-cloud polarization and collaboration: A comprehensive survey for ai. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(7), 6866-6886.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).