Submitted:
28 June 2025
Posted:
30 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Problem Statement
1.3. Objectives of the Study
- Development of the Attention-Driven DeepFM Model: To design an innovative DeepFM architecture that incorporates attention mechanisms, allowing the model to dynamically weigh the importance of different features in the dataset.
- Integration of Meta-Learned Optimization: To implement meta-learning strategies that facilitate quick adaptation to new data distributions and product categories, ensuring the model’s robustness in diverse forecasting scenarios.
- Empirical Validation: To conduct extensive experiments on various datasets from retail and e-commerce sectors, comparing the performance of the proposed hybrid model against traditional forecasting methods and other machine learning approaches.
- Exploration of Practical Implications: To identify the practical benefits of enhanced forecasting accuracy for inventory management, resource allocation, and strategic decision-making within organizations.
1.4. Significance of the Study
1.5. Research Questions
- How can attention mechanisms be effectively integrated into the DeepFM framework to enhance the model’s ability to focus on significant features in product usage data?
- What meta-learning strategies can be employed to improve the adaptability and robustness of the forecasting model across diverse product categories and market conditions?
- How does the proposed hybrid learning approach compare to traditional forecasting methods and other machine learning techniques in terms of predictive accuracy and interpretability?
- What are the practical implications of enhanced product usage prediction for inventory management and strategic decision-making in organizations?
1.6. Structure of the Thesis
1.7. Conclusion
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Traditional Forecasting Techniques
2.2.1. Statistical Methods
2.2.2. Limitations of Traditional Methods
2.3. Advances in Machine Learning
2.3.1. Decision Trees and Ensemble Methods
2.3.2. Neural Networks
2.3.3. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)
2.4. Factorization Machines and DeepFM
2.4.1. The DeepFM Framework
2.5. Attention Mechanisms
2.5.1. Mechanisms of Attention
2.5.2. Applications in Forecasting
2.6. Meta-Learning Strategies
2.6.1. Framework for Meta-Learning
2.6.2. Applications in Forecasting
2.7. Hybrid Learning Approaches
2.7.1. Benefits of Hybrid Models
2.8. Conclusion
Chapter 3: Methodology
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Theoretical Framework
3.2.1. Product Usage Prediction
3.2.2. Deep Factorization Machines
3.2.3. Attention Mechanisms
3.2.4. Meta-Learning Strategies
3.3. Data Collection and Preprocessing
3.3.1. Data Sources
3.3.2. Data Preprocessing Steps
- Data Cleaning: Missing values were addressed through interpolation or imputation techniques. Outliers were identified and managed to prevent skewing the results.
-
Feature Engineering: New features were derived from existing data, including:
- o
- Lagged sales figures to capture temporal dependencies.
- o
- Moving averages to smooth out short-term fluctuations.
- o
- Categorical variables encoded using techniques such as one-hot encoding and target encoding.
- Normalization: Continuous variables were normalized to ensure they contribute equally to the model training process, facilitating convergence.
3.4. Model Architecture
3.4.1. Overview of the Hybrid Model
- Input Layer: Raw data, including historical usage, customer demographics, and product features, are input into the model.
- Embedding Layer: Categorical variables are transformed into dense vector representations to capture relationships among features.
- Deep Learning Component: Comprising multiple fully connected layers, this component learns higher-order interactions and complex patterns from the input data.
- Factorization Machine Component: This component captures pairwise interactions between features, complementing the deep learning aspect of the model.
- Attention Mechanism: Integrated attention layers allow the model to dynamically focus on the most relevant features, enhancing predictive performance.
- Meta-Learning Component: By leveraging past learning experiences, this component enables the model to adapt to new tasks rapidly, improving generalization across different contexts.
3.4.2. Attention Mechanism Integration
- Contextual Embeddings: Each input feature is transformed into a contextual embedding that reflects its significance in relation to other features.
- Attention Weights Calculation: A softmax function computes attention weights, normalizing the importance scores of each feature.
- Weighted Sum: The contextual embeddings are combined using the calculated attention weights, forming a weighted input representation that is subsequently passed through the deep learning layers.
3.5. Training Strategies
3.5.1. Loss Function
3.5.2. Optimization Algorithm
3.5.3. Training Procedure
- Data Splitting: The dataset is divided into training, validation, and test sets to ensure unbiased evaluation of the model.
- Meta-Learning Phase: During this phase, the model is trained on multiple tasks to learn transferable representations across different product categories.
- Model Training: The model is trained iteratively, updating weights based on the calculated loss function. Cross-validation is applied to fine-tune hyperparameters and prevent overfitting.
3.6. Evaluation Metrics
3.6.1. Forecasting Accuracy
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions, providing insight into forecast accuracy.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Emphasizes larger errors by squaring the differences before averaging, offering a comprehensive view of model performance.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Expresses accuracy as a percentage, facilitating comparisons across different scales.
3.6.2. Comparative Analysis
3.7. Experimental Setup
3.8. Conclusion
Chapter 4: Methodology
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Theoretical Foundations
4.2.1. Product Usage Prediction
4.2.2. Deep Factorization Machines
4.2.3. Attention Mechanisms
4.2.4. Meta-Learning Strategies
4.3. Framework Architecture
4.3.1. Overview of the Hybrid Learning Model
- Input Layer: Historical usage data, promotional events, and contextual features are fed into the model.
- Embedding Layer: Categorical variables are transformed into dense vector representations to capture latent interactions.
- Attention Mechanism: Integrated attention layers compute attention weights, allowing the model to emphasize relevant features.
- Deep Learning Component: Multiple fully connected layers learn complex patterns and interactions from the embeddings.
- Factorization Machine Component: This component captures pairwise interactions among features, complementing the deep learning architecture.
- Meta-Learning Component: This component utilizes past learning experiences to inform future predictions, enabling rapid adaptation to new tasks.
4.3.2. Model Architecture Diagram
4.3.3. Hyperparameter Configuration
- Learning Rate: Adjusted using a scheduler to optimize convergence rates during training.
- Batch Size: Selected based on the size of the dataset and available computational resources.
- Number of Layers and Neurons: Configured to balance model complexity and generalization.
4.4. Data Collection and Preprocessing
4.4.1. Data Sources
4.4.2. Data Preprocessing Steps
- Data Cleaning: Removing duplicates, handling missing values through interpolation, and correcting inconsistencies.
- Feature Engineering: Creating additional features, such as lagged values, moving averages, and promotional indicators, to enrich the input data.
- Normalization: Scaling numerical features to a uniform range to improve model convergence and performance.
- Categorical Encoding: Utilizing techniques like one-hot encoding and target encoding to convert categorical variables into numerical formats suitable for model input.
4.5. Model Training and Optimization
4.5.1. Training Procedure
- Data Splitting: The dataset is divided into training, validation, and test sets to ensure unbiased evaluation.
- Meta-Learning Setup: The model is trained on multiple tasks representing different product categories to facilitate knowledge transfer.
- Batch Training: The model is trained using mini-batches to enable faster convergence.
- Loss Function: A combination of Mean Squared Error (MSE) and regularization terms is employed to prevent overfitting.
4.5.2. Optimization Algorithm
4.5.3. Hyperparameter Tuning
4.6. Evaluation Metrics
4.6.1. Forecasting Accuracy
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Emphasizes larger errors by squaring the differences before averaging.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Provides a percentage-based measure of forecasting accuracy, facilitating comparison across different scales.
4.6.2. Comparative Analysis
4.7. Experimental Setup
4.8. Conclusion
Chapter 5: Results and Discussion
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Experimental Setup
5.2.1. Data Description
- Retail Sales Data: Historical transaction data from a major retail chain, consisting of over 500,000 transactions across various product categories over a two-year period. The dataset includes features such as product ID, customer ID, purchase date, quantity sold, price, and promotional flags.
- E-Commerce Interaction Data: User interaction logs from an online marketplace, capturing over 1 million user sessions. This dataset includes features such as user ID, product views, add-to-cart actions, and purchase history.
- Promotional Data: Information regarding promotional campaigns, including start and end dates, discount percentages, and product IDs involved in the promotions.
5.2.2. Data Preprocessing
- Data Cleaning: Missing values were handled through interpolation or deletion. For example, missing sales data were filled using the mean sales of the respective product during the same period.
-
Feature Engineering: New features were created based on domain insights, such as:
- o
- Lagged sales figures for the past 7, 14, and 30 days.
- o
- Promotional impact flags indicating whether a product was on promotion.
- o
- Seasonal indicators based on the month and special events (e.g., holidays).
- Normalization: Continuous features (e.g., price, quantity) were normalized to a standard scale (0 to 1) to enhance model convergence.
- Categorical Encoding: Categorical variables (e.g., product ID, customer ID) were transformed into numerical representations using one-hot encoding and target encoding.
5.2.3. Model Configuration
- Embedding Dimensions: Set to 10 for categorical features to capture latent relationships.
- Network Architecture: The deep learning component consisted of two hidden layers with 64 and 32 neurons, respectively, using ReLU activation functions.
- Attention Mechanism: Integrated to dynamically weigh the importance of different features during the learning process.
- Meta-Learning Strategy: Implemented to facilitate rapid adaptation to new tasks and product categories.
5.3. Evaluation Metrics
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions, providing insight into forecast accuracy.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Emphasizes larger errors by squaring the differences before averaging, thus giving a comprehensive view of model performance.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Expresses forecast accuracy as a percentage, allowing for easy comparison across different scales.
5.4. Results
5.4.1. Performance Comparison
| Model | MAE | RMSE | MAPE |
| ARIMA | 12.34 | 18.56 | 15.27 |
| Random Forest | 10.45 | 14.32 | 12.10 |
| XGBoost | 9.76 | 13.45 | 11.50 |
| Attention-Driven DeepFM | 8.45 | 11.23 | 9.20 |
5.4.2. Sensitivity to Attention Mechanism
5.4.3. Meta-Learning Adaptability
5.5. Discussion
5.5.1. Implications for Practice
- Enhanced Predictive Accuracy: By adopting the Attention-Driven DeepFM framework, organizations can achieve higher accuracy in predicting product usage, allowing for better alignment of inventory levels with actual demand.
- Improved Responsiveness: The integration of attention mechanisms enables businesses to respond more effectively to changing market conditions and consumer preferences, enhancing their competitive edge.
- Resource Optimization: Accurate forecasts can lead to optimized resource allocation, reducing wastage and improving overall operational efficiency.
5.5.2. Limitations
- Data Dependency: The effectiveness of the proposed model is heavily dependent on the quality and quantity of historical data. In cases where data is sparse or unreliable, the model’s performance may be compromised.
- Complexity of Implementation: The hybrid model’s complexity may pose challenges in terms of implementation and maintenance, particularly for organizations with limited technical expertise.
- Generalizability: While the model performed well across multiple datasets, further validation in different contexts and industries is necessary to assess its generalizability.
5.5.3. Future Research Directions
- Integration of External Factors: Future work could explore the inclusion of external variables such as economic indicators, market trends, and competitor actions to further enhance forecasting accuracy.
- Real-Time Forecasting Applications: Investigating the application of the proposed framework in real-time forecasting scenarios could offer valuable insights into its operational feasibility.
- User-Centric Studies: Conducting studies focused on user interaction with the forecasting results could help refine the model and improve its practical applicability in organizational contexts.
5.6. Conclusion
Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions
6.1. Summary of Findings
6.1.1. Effectiveness of the Hybrid Model
6.1.2. Advantages of Meta-Learning
6.1.3. Practical Implications
6.2. Implications for Practice
- Strategic Decision-Making: Organizations can leverage the proposed hybrid learning approach to make data-driven decisions regarding production, inventory management, and marketing strategies. Improved forecasts facilitate informed planning and resource allocation.
- Customer Satisfaction: By accurately predicting product demand, businesses can ensure that customers have access to the products they desire, thereby enhancing overall customer satisfaction and loyalty.
- Operational Efficiency: The model’s capability to optimize inventory levels can lead to reduced holding costs and improved operational performance, contributing to better financial outcomes.
6.3. Limitations of the Study
- Data Dependency: The effectiveness of the proposed model is heavily reliant on the availability and quality of historical usage data. In scenarios where data is sparse or unreliable, the model’s performance may be adversely affected.
- Complexity of Implementation: The hybrid model’s complexity may pose challenges for organizations lacking the necessary technical expertise for implementation and maintenance, potentially hindering widespread adoption.
- Generalizability: While the model demonstrated effectiveness across multiple datasets, its generalizability to other industries or contexts remains to be fully explored. Additional validation in different market scenarios is warranted.
6.4. Future Research Directions
6.4.1. Exploration of Additional Hybrid Models
6.4.2. Incorporation of External Factors
6.4.3. Real-Time Forecasting Applications
6.4.4. Cross-Industry Applications
6.5. Conclusion
References
- Huang, S. , Xi, K., Bi, X., Fan, Y., & Shi, G. (2024, November). Hybrid DeepFM Model with Attention and Meta-Learning for Enhanced Product Usage Prediction. In 2024 4th International Conference on Digital Society and Intelligent Systems (DSInS) (pp. 267-271). IEEE.
- Ma, B.; Xue, Y.; Chen, J.; Sun, F.; Tan, Y.-A. Meta-Learning Enhanced Trade Forecasting: A Neural Framework Leveraging Efficient Multicommodity STL Decomposition. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2024, 2024, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Miao, Q. Multi-Model Fusion Demand Forecasting Framework Based on Attention Mechanism. Processes 2024, 12, 2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Su, L.; Wu, L.; Xiong, W. FedDeepFM: A Factorization Machine-Based Neural Network for Recommendation in Federated Learning. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 74182–74190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. , Piao, H. , Dong, D., Yao, Q., & Zhou, August). Warming Up Cold-Start CTR Prediction by Learning Item-Specific Feature Interactions. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 3233-3244)., J. (2024. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sheng, X.; Liang, K. Meta Domain Adaptation Approach for Multi-domain Ranking. IEEE Access 2025, 1–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, W.; Hu, H.; Wan, X.; Chen, X.; Gui, W. A Domain Knowledge-Supervised Framework Based on Deep Probabilistic Generation Network for Enhancing Industrial Soft-sensing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2025, 1–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, T.; Liu, Q.; Chang, Y.; Asif, M. Digital media recommendation system design based on user behavior analysis and emotional feature extraction. PLOS ONE 2025, 20, e0322768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S. , Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 2019, 52, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S. , Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 2019, 52, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Jangid, M.; Kumar, R. Deep learning approaches to address cold start and long tail challenges in recommendation systems: a systematic review. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2024, 84, 2293–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharibshah, Z.; Zhu, X. User Response Prediction in Online Advertising. ACM Comput. Surv. 2021, 54, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Ishak, I.; Ibrahim, H.; Zolkepli, M.; Sidi, F.; Li, C. Deep Learning-Based Recommendation System: Systematic Review and Classification. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 113790–113835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X. , Wang, M., Zhao, X., Li, J., Zhou, S., Yin, D.,... & Guo, R. (2023). Embedding in recommender systems: A survey. arXiv:2310.18608.
- Le, J. (2020). MetaRec: Meta-Learning Meets Recommendation Systems. Rochester Institute of Technology.
- Yao, J.; Zhang, S.; Yao, Y.; Wang, F.; Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Chu, Y.; Ji, L.; Jia, K.; Shen, T.; et al. Edge-Cloud Polarization and Collaboration: A Comprehensive Survey for AI. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, R. , Niu, C., Yan, Y., Wu, F., Tang, S., Jia, R.,... & Chen, G. (2022). On-device learning with cloud-coordinated data augmentation for extreme model personalization in recommender systems. arXiv:2201.10382.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).