Submitted:
28 June 2025
Posted:
30 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Problem Statement
1.3. Objectives of the Study
- Development of the Hybrid DeepFM Framework: To design a DeepFM model that incorporates attention mechanisms to prioritize significant features in the dataset, thus improving forecast accuracy.
- Integration of Meta-Learning Strategies: To implement meta-learning techniques that enable the model to adapt quickly to varying data distributions and product categories, ensuring robustness in diverse forecasting scenarios.
- Empirical Validation: To conduct extensive experiments on varied datasets, including retail and e-commerce environments, to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed framework compared to existing forecasting models.
- Practical Implications: To explore the implications of improved forecasting accuracy for inventory management and strategic decision-making in organizations.
1.4. Significance of the Study
1.5. Research Questions
- How can attention mechanisms be effectively integrated into the DeepFM framework to enhance the modeling of significant features in product usage data?
- What meta-learning strategies can be employed to improve the adaptability of the forecasting model across different product categories and market conditions?
- How does the proposed Hybrid DeepFM framework compare to traditional forecasting methods in terms of accuracy and reliability?
- What are the broader implications of enhanced product usage forecasting for supply chain management and organizational decision-making?
1.6. Structure of the Thesis
1.7. Conclusions
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Traditional Forecasting Techniques
2.2.1. Time Series Analysis
2.2.2. Machine Learning Techniques
2.3. The Emergence of Deep Learning
2.3.1. Deep Neural Networks
2.3.2. Recurrent Neural Networks and Long Short-Term Memory
2.4. Factorization Machines and DeepFM
2.4.1. The DeepFM Framework
2.5. Attention Mechanisms in Forecasting
2.5.1. Mechanisms of Attention
2.6. Meta-Learning Strategies
2.6.1. Applications of Meta-Learning in Forecasting
2.7. Integrating Hybrid Approaches
2.7.1. Benefits of the Hybrid Framework
2.8. Conclusions
Chapter 3: Methodology
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Theoretical Foundation
3.2.1. Product Usage Forecasting
3.2.2. Deep Factorization Machines
3.2.3. Attention Mechanisms
3.2.4. Meta-Learning Strategies
3.3. Data Collection and Preprocessing
3.3.1. Data Sources
3.3.2. Data Preprocessing
- Data Cleaning: Removing duplicates, handling missing values, and correcting inconsistencies.
- Feature Engineering: Creating additional features that capture temporal trends, such as lagged variables and moving averages.
- Normalization: Scaling numerical features to a uniform range to enhance model convergence.
- Categorical Encoding: Utilizing techniques like one-hot encoding and target encoding to convert categorical variables into numerical formats suitable for model input.
3.4. Model Architecture
3.4.1. Overview of the Hybrid DeepFM Model
- Factorization Machine Component: This component models pairwise interactions among features using a low-rank matrix factorization approach. It serves as the foundation for capturing linear and low-order interactions.
- Deep Learning Component: This consists of multiple fully connected layers that learn higher-order interactions and complex patterns. The output from this component is concatenated with the output of the FM component.
3.4.2. Attention Mechanism Integration
3.4.3. Model Architecture Diagram
3.4.4. Hyperparameter Configuration
- Learning Rate: Adjusted using a scheduler to optimize convergence rates.
- Batch Size: Chosen based on the dataset size and available computational resources.
- Number of Layers and Neurons: Configured to balance model complexity and generalization.
3.5. Training Strategies
3.5.1. Loss Function
3.5.2. Optimization Algorithm
3.5.3. Training Procedure
- Data Splitting: Dividing the dataset into training, validation, and test sets to ensure unbiased evaluation.
- Model Training: Iteratively updating model weights based on the calculated loss function.
- Validation: Monitoring performance on the validation set to tune hyperparameters and prevent overfitting.
3.6. Evaluation Metrics
3.6.1. Forecasting Accuracy
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Emphasizes larger errors by squaring the differences before averaging.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Provides a percentage-based measure of forecasting accuracy, facilitating comparison across different scales.
3.6.2. Comparative Analysis
3.7. Conclusions
Chapter 4: Methodology
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Research Framework
4.2.1. Factorization Machines
4.2.2. Deep Learning Component
4.3. Attention Mechanisms
4.3.1. Implementation of Attention Mechanisms
- Contextual Embeddings: Each input feature is transformed into a contextual embedding that represents its significance relative to other features.
- Attention Weights Calculation: The model computes attention weights using a softmax function, normalizing the importance scores of each feature.
- Weighted Sum: The contextual embeddings are combined using the calculated attention weights to form a weighted input representation, which is then fed into the deep learning layers.
4.4. Meta-Learning Strategies
4.4.1. Framework for Meta-Learning
- Task Sampling: Multiple forecasting tasks are defined, each representing different product categories or seasonal trends. The model is trained on these tasks to learn transferable representations.
- Adaptation Phase: During the adaptation phase, the model fine-tunes its parameters based on a small number of examples from new tasks, thereby improving its performance on unseen data.
4.5. Data Collection and Preprocessing
4.5.1. Dataset Description
4.5.2. Data Preprocessing Steps
- Data Cleaning: Missing values and outliers are addressed through interpolation and z-score methods, respectively.
- Feature Engineering: New features are derived from existing data, such as lagged sales figures, moving averages, and promotional flags, to enhance the model’s input richness.
- Normalization: Continuous features are normalized to ensure that they contribute equally to the model training process.
4.6. Model Training and Evaluation
4.6.1. Training Procedure
- Split Data: The datasets are divided into training, validation, and test sets to facilitate robust evaluation.
- Hyperparameter Tuning: Key hyperparameters, including learning rate, batch size, and the number of layers, are optimized using grid search and cross-validation techniques.
- Loss Function: The model employs a custom loss function that accounts for both prediction accuracy and the importance of minimizing forecast errors.
4.6.2. Evaluation Metrics
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions, providing insight into forecast accuracy.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Focuses on larger errors by penalizing them more heavily, thus offering a comprehensive view of model performance.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Expresses accuracy as a percentage, facilitating comparison across different scales.
4.7. Experimental Setup
4.8. Summary
Chapter 5: Enhancing Product Usage Forecasting Through a Hybrid DeepFM Framework with Integrated Attention Mechanisms and Meta-Learning Strategies
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Theoretical Background
5.2.1. Product Usage Forecasting
5.2.2. Deep Learning and Factorization Machines
5.2.3. Attention Mechanisms
5.2.4. Meta-Learning Strategies
5.3. Methodology
5.3.1. Framework Architecture
- Input Layer: Historical usage data, including time-series features, promotional events, and customer demographics, are input into the model.
- Embedding Layer: Categorical variables are transformed into dense vector representations to capture latent relationships.
- Deep Learning Component: A multi-layer neural network processes the embeddings, extracting complex patterns and interactions.
- Factorization Machine Component: This component models pairwise interactions between features, complementing the deep learning architecture.
- Attention Mechanism: Integrated attention layers allow the model to focus on the most impactful features over time, enhancing predictive capability.
- Meta-Learning Component: This component utilizes past learning experiences to inform future predictions, enabling rapid adaptation to new data contexts.
5.3.2. Data Collection and Preprocessing
- Data Cleaning: Removing outliers and handling missing values.
- Feature Engineering: Creating new features based on domain knowledge, such as lagged variables and seasonal indicators.
- Normalization: Scaling numerical features to ensure consistent input ranges.
5.3.3. Training Procedure
- Batch Training: The model was trained on mini-batches of data to enable faster convergence.
- Cross-Validation: K-fold cross-validation was employed to assess model performance and prevent overfitting.
- Hyperparameter Optimization: Techniques such as grid search and Bayesian optimization were utilized to identify optimal model parameters.
5.4. Results
5.4.1. Evaluation Metrics
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE): Measures the average magnitude of errors in predictions.
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): Provides a measure of the average error magnitude, giving more weight to larger errors.
- Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): Expresses accuracy as a percentage, facilitating comparisons across different scales.
5.4.2. Comparative Analysis
5.4.3. Case Studies
5.5. Discussion
5.5.1. Implications for Practice
5.5.2. Limitations
5.5.3. Future Research Directions
5.6. Conclusions
Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Work
6.1. Summary of Findings
6.1.1. Development of the Hybrid DeepFM Framework
6.1.2. Integration of Meta-Learning Strategies
6.1.3. Empirical Validation
6.2. Implications for Practice
- Optimized Inventory Management: Improved predictions enable organizations to maintain optimal inventory levels, reducing the risks of stockouts and overstock situations. This efficiency translates into cost savings and increased customer satisfaction.
- Informed Decision-Making: Accurate forecasts provide a solid foundation for strategic planning and resource allocation. Organizations can make data-driven decisions regarding production schedules, marketing efforts, and distribution strategies.
- Enhanced Customer Experience: By aligning inventory with actual demand, organizations can better meet customer needs, leading to improved customer loyalty and retention.
- Competitive Advantage: Organizations that adopt advanced forecasting methods are better positioned to respond to market changes, giving them a competitive edge in increasingly saturated markets.
6.3. Limitations of the Study
- Data Limitations: The effectiveness of the Hybrid DeepFM framework is contingent upon the availability and quality of historical usage data. In sectors with limited data, the model’s performance may be constrained.
- Complexity of Implementation: While the model offers significant advantages, its complexity may pose challenges for organizations lacking the technical expertise or resources to implement advanced machine learning solutions.
- Generalizability: While the framework demonstrated effectiveness across various datasets, its generalizability to other industries or product categories remains to be fully explored.
6.4. Future Research Directions
6.4.1. Exploring Additional Hybrid Models
6.4.2. Incorporating External Factors
6.4.3. Real-Time Forecasting Applications
6.4.4. User-Centric Studies
6.5. Conclusions
References
- Huang, S., Xi, K., Bi, X., Fan, Y., & Shi, G. (2024, November). Hybrid DeepFM Model with Attention and Meta-Learning for Enhanced Product Usage Prediction. In 2024 4th International Conference on Digital Society and Intelligent Systems (DSInS) (pp. 267-271). IEEE.
- Ma, B., Xue, Y., Chen, J., & Sun, F. (2024). Meta-Learning Enhanced Trade Forecasting: A Neural Framework Leveraging Efficient Multicommodity STL Decomposition. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2024(1), 6176898.
- Lei, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., & Miao, Q. (2024). Multi-Model Fusion Demand Forecasting Framework Based on Attention Mechanism. Processes, 12(11), 2612.
- Wu, Y., Su, L., Wu, L., & Xiong, W. (2023). FedDeepFM: a factorization machine-based neural network for recommendation in federated learning. IEEE Access, 11, 74182-74190.
- Wang, Y., Piao, H., Dong, D., Yao, Q., & Zhou, J. (2024, August). Warming Up Cold-Start CTR Prediction by Learning Item-Specific Feature Interactions. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 3233-3244).
- Xia, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Sheng, X., & Liang, K. (2025). Meta Domain Adaptation Approach for Multi-domain Ranking. IEEE Access.
- Yue, W., Hu, H., Wan, X., Chen, X., & Gui, W. (2025). A Domain Knowledge-Supervised Framework Based on Deep Probabilistic Generation Network for Enhancing Industrial Soft-sensing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
- Ruan, T., Liu, Q., & Chang, Y. (2025). Digital media recommendation system design based on user behavior analysis and emotional feature extraction. PLoS One, 20(5), e0322768.
- Zhang, S., Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. (2019). Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 52(1), 1-38.
- Zhang, S., Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. (2019). Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 52(1), 1-38.
- Jangid, M., & Kumar, R. (2024). Deep learning approaches to address cold start and long tail challenges in recommendation systems: a systematic review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-33.
- Gharibshah, Z., & Zhu, X. (2021). User response prediction in online advertising. aCM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(3), 1-43.
- Li, C., Ishak, I., Ibrahim, H., Zolkepli, M., Sidi, F., & Li, C. (2023). Deep learning-based recommendation system: systematic review and classification. IEEE Access, 11, 113790-113835.
- Zhao, X., Wang, M., Zhao, X., Li, J., Zhou, S., Yin, D., ... & Guo, R. (2023). Embedding in recommender systems: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18608.
- Le, J. (2020). MetaRec: Meta-Learning Meets Recommendation Systems. Rochester Institute of Technology.
- Yao, J., Zhang, S., Yao, Y., Wang, F., Ma, J., Zhang, J., ... & Yang, H. (2022). Edge-cloud polarization and collaboration: A comprehensive survey for ai. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(7), 6866-6886.
- Gu, R., Niu, C., Yan, Y., Wu, F., Tang, S., Jia, R., ... & Chen, G. (2022). On-device learning with cloud-coordinated data augmentation for extreme model personalization in recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.10382.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).