Submitted:
21 June 2025
Posted:
23 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Principles and Implementation Process
2.1. Theoretical Derivation
2.2. Implementation Process
3. Simulation Validation Experiments and Results
3.1. Simulation Verification Experiment

3.2. Experimental Verification Results

4. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| LLWAS | Low Level Wind Shear Alert System |
References
- Shi,J. Z; Yang,C;Yu, L. S; Fei, Z. Identification and Analysis of Wind Shear Within the Transiting Frontal System at Xining International Airport Using Lidar. remote sens, 2025, 17, 732.
- Jie,D; Lei,Z; Yong,H.Z;etc.Study of Low-Level Wind Shear and Its Evolution Based on LIDAR and Aircraft Reports Identification. Plateau Meteorology, 2023, 42, 1338-1348.
- Zhang,Y; Jian,P.G;Yuan,J.Y;Yu, W;Steve H.L.Y. Vertical Wind Shear Modulates Particulate Matter Pollutions: A Perspective from Radar Wind profiler Observations in Beijing, China. remote sensing, 2020, 12, 546.
- Dragos, M; Marcel,I; Razvan, B..Wind Shear Coefficient Estimation Based on LIDAR Measurements to Improve Power Law Extrapolation Performance. remote sens, 2025, 17, 23.
- LongJ.S; Lin,L.X; Xiu,L.H ;etc, A contrast study on vertical wind shear characteristics of different underlying surfaces. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2019, 55,340-346.
- Browning,K.A; Now casting. New York Academic Press Inc,1982.
- Mccarthy, J; Wilson, J; Fujita, T. The Joint Airport Weather Studies project . Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2013, 63,15-22.
- Harris,F. I; Glover,K.M; Smythe,G.R. Gust front detection and prediction. Preprints 14th conference on Severe Local Storms, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Boston, 1985,342-345.
- Uyeda,H;Zrnic,D.S. Automatic Detection of Gust Fronts. J.atmos.oceanic Technol, 1985, 3,672-679.
- Hermes,L.G; Witt,A; Smith,S,D; et al. The Gust-Front Detection and Wind-Shift Algorithms for the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar System. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 1993, 10, 693-709.
- Köpp,F;Rahm,S; Smalikho,I. Characterization of Aircraft Wake Vortices by 2-μm Pulsed Doppler Lidar. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 2004, 21, 194-206.
- Keohan,C . Ground-based wind shear detection systems have become vital to safe operations. Icao Journal, 2007, 62, 16-34.
- Hu,M.B; ,Tan,Z.Q; Tang,D.Z; et al. Method for detecting low-level wind shear using a Doppler weather radar. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 23, 113-118.
- Li,S. W. Application of Doppler Laser Radar at Hong Kong International Airport. Meeting on Civil Aviation Meteorological Services and Technical Exchange of the China Meteorological Administration. 2004.
- Chan,P. W; Le,Y.F. Application of Short-Range Lidar in Wind Shear Alerting. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 2012, 29, 207–220.
- Wang,N; Liu,L.P; Xve,B.X; et al. Research on methods for identifying low-altitude wind shear and convergence lines using Doppler radar data.Annual Conference of the Chinese Meteorological Society. 2007.
- Wei,Y; Zhang,X. G.Research and Improve on a Method of Radial Velocity Azimuth Composite Shear Using Doppler Weather Radar.Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2010, 32, 43–47.
- Zheng,J. F; Zhang,J; Zhu,K.Y; et al. Gust Front Statistical Characteristics and Automatic Identification Algorithm for CINRAD. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2014, 28, 607–623.
- 蒋立辉Jiang,L.H; Zhang,C.Q; Xiong,X.L; et al. Study on type recognition of low-level wind shear based on radar image simulation. Laser&Infrared, 2013, 43(3):334-338.
- Hon,K. K; Chan,P.W. Application of LIDAR-derived eddy dissipation rate profiles in low-level wind shear and turbulence alerts at Hong Kong International Airport. Meteorological Applications, 2014, 21, 74–85.
- Chan,P. W. Application of LIDAR-based F-factor in wind shear alerting. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2012, 21, 193–204(12).


| Month | Wind speed (m/s) |
|---|---|
| 1. | 7.75 |
| 2. | 7.80 |
| 3. | 8.52 |
| 4. | 8.61 |
| 5. | 8.52 |
| 6. | 6.32 |
| 7. | 6.00 |
| 8. | 6.30 |
| 9. | 5.50 |
| 10. | 6.62 |
| 11. | 7.51 |
| 12. | 8.30 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).