Submitted:
03 June 2025
Posted:
04 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. The Nexus of Sustainable Finance and Blockchain
2.1. Increasing Openness and Confidence
2.2. Enhancing Accessibility and Efficiency
2.3. Confirmable Impact Assessment
3. Key Components of the Perfect Structure
3.1. Strong Financial Models and Tokenomics
- Utility tokens offer access to resources or services inside the project’s ecosystem (e.g., voting rights, data access, discounted fees).
- Security tokens are representations of ownership or financial rights in underlying assets or revenue streams—for example, fractional ownership of renewable energy projects.
- Directly related to quantifiable environmental or social results, impact tokens could provide incentives or discounts depending on accomplished impact (e.g., carbon credits, biodiversity tokens).
- Staking mechanisms let users lock up coins to either help the network or engage in governance, therefore rewarding their participation (Arafat, 2025).
- Deflationary/Inflationary Models: Precisely balanced to preserve token value and encourage engagement without generating speculative bubbles or disincentives.
3.2. Open, Decentralized Governance
- On-chain Voting: Letting token holders weigh in on important proposals including project financing, protocol developments, or impact verification techniques.
- Multi-signature wallets enhance security and guard against single points of failure by requiring several approvals for important transactions.
- Complementing on-chain voting with off-chain debates helps to guarantee informed decision-making and wide agreement.
- Smart contracts can hold governance choices accountable, therefore guaranteeing that project milestones are achieved and money distributed as voted (Baninemeh et al., 2023).
3.3. Verifiable Impact Assessment and Documentation
- Standardized Impact Metrics: Following internationally accepted ESG reporting systems (e.g., SASB, GRI, TCFD) guarantees impact data’s comparability and reliability by means of
- Although blockchain offers immutability, independent auditors or verifiers can still help to confirm the technique and correctness of data entries prior to on-chain recording (Chen et al., 2025).
- Public dashboards let stakeholders track project progress and confirmed impact data in real-time, readily available (Bhandari et al., 2025).
3.4. Interoperable and Scalable Technical Frameworks
- Cross-chain Compatibility: Gaining a more linked ecosystem (Into, 2024) depends on using bridges or standards enabling assets and information to flow effortlessly across several blockchains.
- Using decentralized storage options (e.g., IPFS, Arweave) for big datasets, too expensive or impracticable to store directly on-chain (Pham et al., 2023).
4. Sustainable Financial Project Innovations on Blockchain
4.1. Decentralized Carbon Markets
4.2. Tokenization of Impact Bonds and Green Bonds
4.3. Sustainable Supply Chain Finance
4.4. Blockchain and Local Energy Markets
4.5. Markets for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
5. Difficulties and Roadblocks
5.1. Uncertainty in Regulation and Compliance
5.2. Energy Use and Scalability
5.3. Fragmentation and Interoperability
5.4. Oracle Problem and Data Integrity
5.5. Obstacle to Adoption and Education
5.6. Smart Contract Vulnerability and Security Concerns
6. Perspectives and Future Outlook
6.1. Regulatory Clarity and Sandboxes
6.2. Evolution of Blockchain Technology
6.3. Institutional Adoption and Hybrid Models
6.4. Data Standardization and Interoperability Solutions
6.5. Focus on Real-World Impact and Measurable Outcomes
6.6. Education and Capacity Building
7. Conclusion
References
- Ahmadjee, S.; Mera-Gómez, C.; Farshidi, S.; Bahsoon, R.; Kazman, R. Decision Support Model for Selecting the Optimal Blockchain Oracle Platform: An Evaluation of Key Factors. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2025, 34, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arafat, S.M. A Study of Blockchain Consensus Protocols. Cryptology ePrint Archive 2025.
- Baninemeh, E.; Farshidi, S.; Jansen, S. A decision model for decentralized autonomous organization platform selection: Three industry case studies. Blockchain: Research and Applications 2023, 4, 100127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednárová, M. ESG Reporting and Communication. In Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investment and Reporting; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 175–202. [Google Scholar]
- Bhandari, M.; Tiwari, G.; Dhakal, M. Enhancing transparency and accountability in sustainable finance through blockchain technology: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision 2025, 4, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatti, S. All About Crypto And It’s Ecosystem; Xlibris Corporation: 2025.
- Busch, T.; Pruessner, E.; Brosche, H.; Bannier, C.; Choi, Y.J.; Friede, G.; Höck, A.; Kölsch, R.; Krüger, P.; Schmidt, M.; Ströhle, J. Principles for impact investments: Practical guidance for impact measurement, assessment and valuation. SN Business & Economics 2025, 5, 48. [Google Scholar]
- Buterin, V.; Illum, J.; Nadler, M.; Schär, F.; Soleimani, A. Blockchain privacy and regulatory compliance: Towards a practical equilibrium. Blockchain: Research and Applications 2024, 5, 100176. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, B.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Feng, D.; Peng, M.; Zhang, L.; Han, Z. Blockchain systems, technologies, and applications: A methodology perspective. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2022, 25, 353–385. [Google Scholar]
- Chalkias, K.K.; Kostis, A.; Alnuaimi, A.; Knez, P.; Naulty, J.; Salmasi, A.; Servatius, R.; Veloso, R. Preserving Nature’s Ledger: Blockchains in Biodiversity Conservation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.12086. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Cao, F.; Wang, Q.; Ye, Z.; Editorial Board of the” 14th Five-Year” Higher Education Planning Textbook Intelligent Medicine Series Textbook, Blockchain Professional Committee of Chinese Computer Federation and Digital Diagnosis and Treatment Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Association. 2024 Chinese guideline on the construction and application of medical blockchain. Intelligent Medicine 2025, 5, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Z.; Tang, C.; Li, T.; Abla, P.; Chen, Q.; Liang, W.; He, D. Enhancing Blockchain Cross Chain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.04934. [Google Scholar]
- Eswaran, U.; Eswaran, V.; Eswaran, V.; Murali, K. Security, Risk Management, and Ethical AI in the Future of DeFi. In AI-Driven Decentralized Finance and the Future of Finance; IGI Global: 2024; pp. 48–88.
- Folorunso, E.O. The Green Future of Finance: Blockchain and Al as Catalysts. Energy-Efficient Deep Learning Approaches in IoT, Fog, and Green Blockchain Revolution p. 233. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Gamage, H.T.M.; Weerasinghe, H.D.; Dias, N.G.J. A survey on blockchain technology concepts, applications, and issues. SN Computer Science 2020, 1, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Into, A.G. 11 Exploring Future. In Artificial Intelligence Using Federated Learning: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Applications; 2024; Volume 196. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, A.Y.; Kim, H.M.; Lim, J.H. Does Blockchain Help Make the World Better? Analyzing the Effect of Blockchain Adoption on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance of Firms. Journal of Information Systems 2025, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, P.J.; Stafford, R.; Hesse, I.; Khuu, D.T. Incentive diversity is key to the more effective and equitable governance of marine protected areas. Frontiers in Marine Science 2024, 11, 1412654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kshetri, N. Blockchain and supply chain management; Elsevier: 2025.
- Lin, W.L.; Yang, Y.; Leow, N.X.; Lim, W.M.; Khee, P.C.; Yip, N. Trends in the dynamic evolution of blockchain and circular economy: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment 2025, 34, 1062–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A.; Chen, C. From real estate financialization to decentralization: A comparative review of REITs and blockchain-based tokenization. Geoforum 2025, 159, 104193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mageed, I.A. 2025. Challenging the Transformation of Management Practices Through Agility. Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) doi:10.20944/preprints202505.2238.v1. [CrossRef]
- Martins, R. Web3 in Financial Services: How Blockchain, Digital Assets and Crypto are Disrupting Traditional Finance; Kogan Page Publishers: 2024.
- McCarthy, J. Developments in Financial Services: UK and EU Approaches to Digital Finance. In The New Relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 385–404. [Google Scholar]
- Miyan, M.S.; Cheong, C.W.; Sharif, A.; Afshan, S. Three decades of green finance: The state of the art and way forward. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2024, 14, 88–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onat, N.C.; Jabbar, R.; Kucukvar, M.; Wakjira, T.; Kutty, A.A.; Fetais, N. Carbon footprint of global Bitcoin mining: Emissions beyond borders. Sustainability Science 2025, 20, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, S.; Zhao, X.; Yu, S.; Chen, J.; Deng, S.; Yin, J. TrustPay: A Dual-Layer Blockchain-based Framework for Trusted Service Transaction. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 2025. [CrossRef]
- Pham, N.D.K.; Dinh, G.H.; Pham, H.T.; Kozak, J.; Hoang, P.N. Role of green logistics in the construction of sustainable supply chains. Polish Maritime Research 2023, 30, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saggese, P.; Segalla, E.; Sigmund, M.; Raunig, B.; Zangerl, F.; Haslhofer, B. Assessing the solvency of virtual asset service providers: Are current standards sufficient? Applied Economics 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, J. Emerging Paradigms in Non-Profit Governance: A Comprehensive Analysis of Disruptive Innovations. In New Trends for the Governance of Non-Profit Organizations; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: 2025; pp. 1–86.
- Singh, V.; Sharma, S.K. Application of blockchain technology in shaping the future of food industry based on transparency and consumer trust. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2023, 60, 1237–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taherdoost, H.; Saeedi, M. Introduction to Blockchain and Sustainability. In Applications of Blockchain and Computational Intelligence in Environmental Sustainability; CRC Press: 2025; pp. 1–14.
- Tayal, M.; Chopra, P. Sustainable Finance and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In Community Climate Justice and Sustainable Development; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: 2025; pp. 19–42.
- Thong, M.S. Blockchain Drive for Financial Inclusion. In Blockchain for Financial Governance in Malaysia and Singapore: Transforming Regulatory and Shariah Compliance to Drive Financial Inclusion (). Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025; pp. 139–176.
- Tyagi, K. A global blockchain-based agro-food value chain to facilitate trade and sustainable blocks of healthy lives and food for all. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2023, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, B.; Singla, B.; Mittal, A. (Eds.) Digital technologies, ethics, and decentralization in the digital era. IGI Global: 2024.
- Wang, T.; Shittu, E. Synthetic modeling to manage the nexus of food, energy, and water systems under uncertainty: The case of the Columbia River Basin. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2024, 190, 110069. [Google Scholar]
- Wanotayapitak, S. Architecture for the Academic Certificate System on the Ethereum Layer 2 Solution. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal 2025, 19, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, S.W.; Park, N.E.; Lee, I.G. Wake-Up Security: Effective Security Improvement Mechanism for Low Power Internet of Things. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 2023, 37. [Google Scholar]
- ZACZYK, M.; 2024. AREAS OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION IN SMART CITY–PART II. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, (212).
- Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Meng, J. Auditing in the blockchain: A literature review. Frontiers in Blockchain 2025, 8, 1549729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
