Submitted:
02 June 2025
Posted:
02 June 2025
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Case Description
2.1. Case 1
- The pigmentation of the scar significantly normalized. The previously dark violaceous and reddish discoloration diminished, blending more seamlessly with the surrounding skin.
- There was a marked reduction in scar thickness and protrusion. The previously elevated, nodular keloidal margins flattened considerably, resulting in a more even surface contour.
- The texture of the skin improved noticeably. The rough, scaly, and irregular surface observed before treatment became smoother, with improved elasticity and a healthy sheen.
- Subjective symptoms, including persistent itching and pain, were fully relieved. The patient reported no discomfort during rest or ambulation following treatment.
- Functional recovery was also observed. The initial gait disturbance caused by contracture and scar tightness around the ankle was resolved.
2.2. Case 2
- Scar thickness and firmness reduced noticeably, showing a smoother and more uniform texture.
- Skin tone normalized, with reduced redness and the demarcation blended with the surrounding tissue.
- Pain and itching completely resolved.
- Wrist flexibility and range of motion improved significantly.
2.3. Case 3
- The scar surface became significantly flatter and less fibrotic, with a marked improvement in contour integration and reduced skin tension.
- The hard, bumpy texture softened, and the demarcation lines visibly blended.
- The color of the scar blended more harmoniously with the adjacent skin.
- Overall facial symmetry improved, with perioral movement appearing more natural.
2.4. Case 4
- The surface texture of the scar normalized significantly, with a marked reduction in rigidity and a more uniform appearance.
- The hyperpigmented areas and keratotic features largely resolved, reflecting substantial improvement in both pigmentation and overall color uniformity.
- Elevated, hypopigmented suture lines at the scar margins became less prominent and blended more seamlessly into adjacent tissue.
- The reduced skin thickness alleviated wrist movement discomfort, improving flexibility.
2.5. Case 5
- Scar thickness and stiffness were markedly reduced, resulting in a significantly flatter and less fibrotic surface. Mesh-pattern ridges characteristic of split-thickness grafts became less visible, indicating dermal remodeling and integration with surrounding tissue.
- The previously elevated and indurated texture softened, leading to smoother surface contours and improved tactile quality.
- Scar color transitioned toward a more natural skin tone, demonstrating pigment normalization and better chromatic blending with adjacent skin.
- Scar boundaries became less defined, suggesting successful contour integration and edge softening.
- Overall cosmetic appearance improved, enhancing patient satisfaction and restoring a more natural visual skin landscape.
Discussion
Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2023.12.12 #1 Pinholxell | 2015-04-21 #1 Pinholxell | 2021-11-10 #1 Pinholxell |
| 2024.02.06 #2 Pinholxell | 2015-06-18 #2 Pinholxell | 2021-12-30 #2 Pinholxell |
| 2024.04.04 #3 Pinholxell | 2015-10-13 #3 Pinholxell | 2022-02-22 #3 Pinholxell |
| 2024.07.07 #4 Pinholxell | 2016-05-18 eCO2 | 2022-04-19 #4 Pinholxell |
| 2024.08.07 eCO2* | 2016-07-22 eCO2 | 2022-06-07 #5 Pinholxell |
| 2024.10.23 #5 Pinholxell | 2016-10-18 #4 Pinholxell | 2022-08-26 #6 Pinholxell |
| 2025.01.17 #6 Pinholxell | 2017-03-21 #5 Pinholxell | 2022-10-26 #7 Pinholxell |
| 2025.03.14 eCO2* | 2017-06-07 eCO2 | 2022-12-15 #8 Pinholxell |
| 2025.05.16 eCO2* | 2017-08-25 eCO2 | 2023-02-24 #9 Pinholxell |
| 2017-11-03 eCO2 | 2023-04-18 #10 Pinholxell | |
| 2018-02-28 eCO2 | 2023-06-20 #11 Pinholxell | |
| 2018-06-04 eCO2 | 2023-09-19 #12 Pinholxell | |
| 2018-10-01 eCO2 | 2023-11-22 eCO2 | |
| 2019-02-12 eCO2 | 2024-01-24 eCO2 | |
| 2019-08-26 eCO2 | 2024-03-22 eCO2 | |
| 2024-05-13 eCO2 | ||
| 2024-08-26 eCO2 | ||
| 2024-10-21 eCO2 | ||
| 2024-12-09 eCO2 | ||
| 2025-02-24 eCO2 |
| Case 4 | Case 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-11 #1 Pinholxell | 2018.08.13 #1 Pinholxell | |
| 2019-04-11 #2 Pinholxell | 2018.1.08 #2 Pinholxell | |
| 2019-06-07 #3 Pinholxell | 2018.12.11 #3 Pinholxell | |
| 2019-08-16 #4 Pinholxell | 2019.03.04 #4 Pinholxell | |
| 2019-11-21 #5 Pinholxell | 2019.05.14 #5 Pinholxell | |
| 2020-01-29 eCO2* | 2019.07.17 eCO2 | |
| 2020-03-06 eCO2 | 2019.08.29 eCO2 | |
| 2020-05-07 eCO2 | 2019.11.26 eCO2 | |
| 2020-08-12 #6 Pinholxell | 2020.01.30 eCO2 | |
| 2020-10-30 #7 Pinholxell | 2020.04.08 eCO2 | |
| 2020-12-28 eCO2 | 2020.07.09 eCO2 | |
| 2021-03-05 eCO2 | ||
| 2021-06-11 eCO2, Nd:YAG ** | ||
| 2021-08-12 eCO2, Nd:YAG | ||
| 2021-10-08 eCO2, Nd:YAG | ||
| 2022-01-03 eCO2 | ||
| 2022-05-30 eCO2 | ||
References
- Aleman Paredes, K.; Selaya Rojas, J.C.; Flores Valdes, J.R.; Castillo, J.L.; Montelongo Quevedo, M.; Mijangos Delgado, F.J.; de la Cruz Duran, H.A.; Nolasco Mendoza, C.L.; Nunez Vazquez, E.J. A Comparative Analysis of the Outcomes of Various Graft Types in Burn Reconstruction Over the Past 24 Years: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024, 16, e54277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harrison, C.A.; MacNeil, S. The mechanism of skin graft contraction: An update on current research and potential future therapies. Burns 2008, 34, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baumann, M.E.; Clairmonte, I.A.; DeBruler, D.M.; Blackstone, B.N.; Malara, M.M.; Supp, D.M.; Bailey, J.K.; Powell, H.M. FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model. Burn. Open 2019, 3, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wei, X. The Safety and Efficacy of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Burns 2021, 47(5), 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leszczynski, R.; da Silva, C.A.; Pinto, A.C.P.N.; Kuczynski, U.; da Silva, E.M. Laser Therapy for Treating Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, (9), CD011642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.J.; Yeo, I.K.; Kang, J.M.; Chung, W.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, B.J.; Park, K.Y. Treatment of hypertrophic burn scars by combination laser-cision and pinhole method using a carbon dioxide laser. Lasers Surg. Med. 2014, 46, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whang, S.W.; Lee, K.-Y.; Cho, S.B.; Lee, S.J.; Kang, J.M.; Kim, Y.K.; Nam, I.H.; Chung, K.Y. Burn scars treated by pinhole method using a carbon dioxide laser. J. Dermatol. 2006, 33, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Ng, S.K.-H.; Xi, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Su, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model. Burn. Trauma 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cox, C.; Bettiol, P.; Le, A.; MacKay, B.J.; Griswold, J.; McKee, D. CO2 laser resurfacing for burn and traumatic scars of the hand and upper extremity. Scars Burn. Heal. 2022, 8, 20595131211047694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klifto, K.M.; Asif, M.; Hultman, C.S. Laser management of hypertrophic burn scars: A comprehensive review. Burn. Trauma 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shirakami, E.; Yamakawa, S.; Hayashida, K. Strategies to prevent hypertrophic scar formation: A review of therapeutic interventions based on molecular evidence. Burn. Trauma 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poetschke, J.; Gauglitz, G.G. Hyperpigmented Scar. In Textbook on Scar Management: State of the Art Management and Emerging Technologies; Téot, L., Mustoe, T.A., Middelkoop, E., Gauglitz, G.G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).