Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Parents as First Responders: Experiences of Emergency Care in Children with Nemaline Myopathy. A Qualitative Study

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

27 May 2025

Posted:

28 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: Nemaline Myopathy is a rare congenital neuromuscular disease associated with progressive weakness and frequent respiratory complications. In emergency situations, families often serve as the first and only responders. This study explores the experiences of parents in Spain managing emergency care and clinical deterioration in children with this condition, with special attention to home-based decision-making and transitions to intensive care. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted with 17 parents from 10 families belonging to the Asociación Yo Nemalínica. Semi-structured interviews were performed via video call, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Giorgi’s descriptive method and ATLAS.ti software. Methodological rigor was ensured through triangulation, reflexivity, and member validation. Results: Four themes were identified. First, families described acting under extreme pressure and in isolation during acute home emergencies, often providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and respiratory support without professional backup. Second, they managed ambiguous signs of deterioration using clinical judgment and home monitoring tools, often preventing fatal outcomes. Third, parents frequently assumed guiding roles in emergency departments due to a lack of clinician familiarity with the disease, leading to delays or errors. Finally, the transition to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit was marked by emotional distress and rapid decision-making, with families often participating in critical choices about invasive procedures. These findings underscore the complex, multidisciplinary nature of caregiving. Conclusions: Parents play an active clinical role during emergencies and deterioration episodes. Their lived experience should be formally integrated into emergency protocols and continuity of care strategies to improve safety and outcomes.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Although individually rare, rare diseases—defined in the European Union as those affecting fewer than 5 in 10,000 individuals—collectively impact more than 300 million people worldwide [1]. Most have a genetic origin, manifest in childhood, and typically follow a chronic, progressive, and disabling course. As such, their impact extends beyond physical health, significantly affecting the emotional and psychosocial well-being of families [2].
Nemaline myopathy is one such rare congenital neuromuscular disorder, characterized by progressive muscle weakness, generalized hypotonia, respiratory compromise, and feeding impairment. Its clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, ranging from mild forms compatible with long-term survival to severe neonatal variants associated with early mortality [3]. Diagnosis relies primarily on histological findings, with nemaline rods observed in skeletal muscle fibers via trichrome staining or electron microscopy being the pathological hallmark [4]. The condition demonstrates substantial genotypic and phenotypic variability, involving mutations in multiple genes such as ACTA1, NEB, KLHL40, and LMOD3, among others [5].
In its most severe forms, neonates may present with profound hypotonia and immediate respiratory failure, requiring ventilatory support from birth. As children grow, chronic respiratory complications are common—such as hypoventilation, apneas, recurrent infections, and dependence on non-invasive ventilation or tracheostomy [6]. These are often exacerbated by dysphagia, increasing the risk of aspiration and pneumonia, thereby compromising clinical stability and quality of life [7]. Cardiac involvement, including cardiomyopathy, has also been reported in some cases, worsening the overall prognosis [8].
Acute, life-threatening events may occur suddenly and outside hospital settings, demanding urgent and precise responses from caregivers [9]. Consequently, the home frequently becomes the initial site of emergency care. Prolonged daily caregiving leads many parents to acquire essential clinical competencies, such as respiratory monitoring, operation of medical devices (e.g., ventilators, oximeters), and administration of resuscitation techniques [10].
Despite this reality, scientific literature has largely focused on the biomedical dimensions of the disease, with limited attention to the lived experiences of families— particularly in emergency contexts. Benedetto et al. emphasize the need to recognize informal caregivers as frontline providers, especially under high clinical risk conditions [11]. The situation is further compounded by the insufficient preparedness of emergency services to respond effectively to rare and complex diseases, exacerbating the vulnerability of these children and their families [12,13].
Against this backdrop, the present study aims to explore the experiences of parents in Spain caring for children with nemaline myopathy during emergency situations. Through their narratives, the study examines not only the clinical interventions performed at home, but also the emotional and organizational dimensions that shape caregiving in the face of a rare, chronic, and potentially life-threatening condition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

A qualitative study was conducted following a descriptive phenomenological approach, rooted in the philosophical framework of Edmund Husserl. The objective was to gain a deep understanding of the lived experiences of parents whose children were diagnosed with nemaline myopathy [14,15]. This methodology emphasized the participants’ subjective perspectives, employing phenomenological reduction to bracket researcher assumptions and focus on detailed, context-rich accounts of their everyday caregiving realities [16].

2.2. Research Team and Reflexivity

The research team comprised four male nursing professionals and university faculty members with prior experience in qualitative research. Although one researcher was personally acquainted with a participant, no prior professional relationship existed. At the outset of the study, two reflexive sessions were conducted to articulate the team’s positionality, during which theoretical frameworks, personal beliefs, and motivations were openly discussed and acknowledged [17].
The study was guided by an interpretive paradigm, aiming to explore the phenomenon through the participants’ lived experiences, understood as socially constructed knowledge. The team recognized that nemaline myopathy, due to its rarity and clinical complexity, creates substantial vulnerability for families—particularly in life-threatening situations requiring rapid, autonomous parental response in the absence of immediate professional support. Additionally, systemic gaps were identified in home-based care, continuity of services, and the readiness of emergency professionals.
This research was motivated by the need to deepen understanding of how parents experience and make sense of caregiving under critical conditions. By amplifying their voices, the study aims to inform more responsive healthcare practices and support systems tailored to the unique challenges of rare pediatric diseases.

2.3. Context and Setting

The study was conducted in Spain and focused on families affiliated with the Asociación Yo Nemalínica, a national non-profit organization that provides support to individuals diagnosed with nemaline myopathy and their families [18]. Spain’s healthcare system follows a decentralized model, with health service responsibilities distributed across 17 autonomous regions. This structure results in significant regional disparities in the availability and accessibility of specialized care for rare diseases such as nemaline myopathy [19]. Given the complexity of the condition, effective home-based management requires coordinated, multidisciplinary care involving various medical specialties [20].

2.4. Sampling Strategies and Participants

This study included 17 parents (10 mothers and 7 fathers) from 10 families residing in Spain, all of whom had children under the age of 18 diagnosed with nemaline myopathy and were members of the Asociación Yo Nemalínica. Although participation was open to other family members, only parents ultimately took part in the study. Recruitment began after the project was publicly introduced during the 5th National Meeting of the Asociación Yo Nemalínica in November 2021.
A purposive sampling strategy was employed, selecting participants based on their direct caregiving experience rather than clinical representativeness, in line with the study’s phenomenological aims [21]. Sampling continued until thematic saturation was reached—defined as the point at which no new themes or relevant insights emerged from additional interviews [22]. All participants completed the study, and no dropouts were recorded.

2.5. Data Collection

Between January 2022 and June 2023, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews incorporating open-ended questions, allowing for an in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences and perspectives (see Table 1). Each participant completed a single interview session conducted remotely via Microsoft Teams, a platform chosen for its accessibility and alignment with current standards in digital qualitative research [23,24].
Individualized invitations were sent via email, and informed verbal consent was obtained prior to each session. With participants' approval, both audio and video were recorded. This dual-recording method enabled the capture of both verbal content and non-verbal cues—such as facial expressions, eye movements, and body posture—providing essential context for emotional and experiential interpretation. In parallel, researchers documented field notes to register behavioral observations, environmental context, and methodological reflections [25].
The interview process generated a total of 1,246 minutes of recorded material, with individual sessions ranging in duration and averaging 74.6 minutes (SD ± 29.1).

2.6. Analysis

A comprehensive analytic strategy was employed, beginning with verbatim transcription of each interview and the compilation of inductive field notes. To facilitate systematic coding and data organization, the research team utilized ATLAS.ti (version 2024), a qualitative analysis software.
Thematic analysis was conducted following Giorgi’s descriptive phenomenological method, which aims to capture the essential structure of participants’ lived experiences while minimizing researcher interpretation [26]. The process unfolded in four stages: first, transcripts were read holistically to grasp the overall narrative and emotional tone; second, a detailed line-by-line analysis was conducted to identify significant meaning units, which were coded using ATLAS.ti. These units were then clustered into thematic categories based on recurrent patterns and conceptual coherence. Finally, categories were synthesized into overarching themes that reflect key dimensions of the caregiving experience among families of children with nemaline myopathy.
Each transcript was initially analyzed independently to preserve the authenticity of individual narratives. Coding was performed collaboratively, and discrepancies were resolved through team consensus to ensure methodological rigor, analytical consistency, and credibility of the findings.

2.7. Rigor Criteria

This study adhered to established guidelines for qualitative research, including the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) [17], the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) [27], and Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria [28]. A series of methodological strategies were employed to enhance the rigor, credibility, and transparency of the findings. Investigator triangulation was achieved through independent coding and collaborative analysis, while methodological triangulation combined semi-structured interviews with field notes. To ensure accuracy and authenticity, participant validation (member checking) was carried out.
Transferability was supported by providing rich, contextualized descriptions of participants, settings, and research procedures, enabling readers to assess applicability to other contexts. Dependability was reinforced through an external audit conducted by an independent researcher. Confirmability was addressed through reflexive practices, including positionality statements and researcher journaling. These integrated strategies contributed to the overall trustworthiness of the study and anchored the findings in the lived experiences of participants.

2.8. Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation was entirely voluntary. All participants received detailed information regarding the objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits of the study, and provided informed verbal consent prior to data collection. They were also informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any point without consequences.
To protect privacy and ensure confidentiality, all interview data were anonymized and stored securely in password-protected files accessible only to the research team. Identifying information was removed from transcripts and replaced with pseudonyms. Audio and video recordings were permanently deleted after transcription and analysis were completed.
Given the emotionally sensitive nature of the interviews, particular care was taken to foster a respectful and supportive environment throughout the data collection process. Researchers were trained in empathetic listening and monitored participants' emotional well-being during the interviews. When necessary, participants were reminded of their right to pause or discontinue the session at any time.

3. Results

The majority of participants were married (64.7%), had one or two children (41.2% each), and resided in urban areas (70.6%) in owner-occupied housing (88.2%). Most households owned a vehicle (70.6%) and reported having a university-level education (70.6%). Employment status varied, with 17.6% of participants on parental leave. Monthly household income was highest in the ≥€2000 bracket (41.2%). The gender distribution among children was evenly split between male and female (See Table 2). From the interview data, four major themes emerged (See Figure 1). Selected excerpts from participants’ narratives are presented to illustrate and contextualize each theme.

Theme 1. Out-of-Hospital Emergencies: Caring in Isolation and Under Pressure

Home-based care for children with nemaline myopathy places significant demands on families, where parents frequently act as first responders to sudden clinical deteriorations without immediate professional support and with no margin for delay. In these contexts, the home becomes the primary setting for life-sustaining interventions. M1 underscores the profound sense of isolation inherent in home care: unlike the hospital environment, there is no support network at hand, and the burden of critical decision-making often falls solely on the parent.
This reality is vividly illustrated in P2's account of responding to his child's cardiopulmonary arrest at home. He acted swiftly, performing CPR and initiating BiPAP ventilation before emergency services arrived. His narrative reflects both the technical competence and intense emotional pressure that families endure during high-stakes emergencies.
Furthermore, the critical nature of these episodes frequently extends beyond the initial response and into the hospital transfer process. P5 describes the distressing experience of an ambulance transporting her clinically unstable daughter suddenly stopping on the highway, creating a moment of extreme uncertainty and fear. Similarly, M8 highlights a systemic weakness: the lack of preparedness among some emergency professionals to manage complex cases of nemaline myopathy. Following a severe decompensation and inadequate initial care, her daughter required urgent admission to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for stabilization—an outcome she describes as "a miracle."
Collectively, these narratives depict the family as the cornerstone of emergency response, often acting in isolation and without structured support. In the absence of timely medical intervention and professional readiness, it is the parents' intuition, technical skills, and unwavering commitment that become vital to the child's survival (See Table 3).

Theme 2. Decision-Making Under Pressure: Managing Clinical Deterioration at Home

Beyond the urgent interventions already described, many families of children with NM face an additional layer of complexity: the need to identify, interpret, and manage ambiguous clinical signs that—if not addressed in time—can escalate into life-threatening situations. These events often do not begin as obvious crises, but rather as subtle signs of decline that require constant attention, clinical judgment, and decisive action in highly uncertain conditions.
M4's experience is illustrative in this regard. She refused her daughter's hospital discharge, guided by her intuition that something was not right. Shortly thereafter, the child suffered a cardiac arrest, confirming the seriousness of the condition that had been underestimated by the medical team. Her determination was crucial in saving her daughter’s life. A common pattern across multiple accounts is the silent progression of respiratory deterioration, which can go unnoticed even by healthcare professionals. M4 recalls how her daughter began showing signs of drowsiness and cyanosis while at school. Upon admission to the PICU, she was found to have an oxygen saturation of 65% and a CO₂ retention of 210, revealing the severity that may lie behind subtle clinical signs. In other cases, continuous home monitoring helped identify imminent risk. M8, for example, observed nonspecific signs such as fatigue, distress, and loss of appetite. Using a pulse oximeter, she discovered a dangerously low oxygen saturation of 68%. These episodes highlight not only the importance of vigilant home monitoring but also parents' ability to anticipate clinical deterioration—often without direct clinical support. Home use of medical technologies and devices also involves significant risks. P3 and M7 described critical incidents resulting from ventilator failures or errors in nasogastric tube feeding, showing that even experienced caregivers must deal with system fragility and ongoing uncertainty. Finally, accounts such as M2’s reveal the lasting emotional impact of these situations. After performing CPR on her child at home, she described it as the worst moment of her life, emphasizing that only her ability to act quickly prevented a tragedy. Her testimony reflects the immense responsibility that families must shoulder in such moments.
Far from being exceptional, these experiences represent the daily reality for many families who, in the absence of immediate medical support, develop essential clinical and technical skills. In this context, continuous vigilance and early intervention become vital forms of caregiving (See Table 4).

Theme 3. Shared Emergencies: When Families Guide Professional Care

Pediatric emergency care plays a central role in the healthcare journey of families with children diagnosed with NM. Although emergency services are designed to respond rapidly to critical situations, the testimonies collected reveal that they are not always prepared to address the complexity of this rare condition. In response to this gap, parents often cease to be mere companions and instead become clinical interpreters, mediators between lay knowledge and professional expertise, and active monitors of potential system failures.
M1 illustrates how emergency visits became routine to the point that she knew exactly what to say to ensure her child received the appropriate care. However, such expertise is not always acknowledged. M8 recounts the distress of being assisted by a professional unfamiliar with NM, which led to a critical delay in care. Similarly, M9 describes how her concerns about her child’s respiratory symptoms were dismissed until an objective test finally prompted medical intervention. These accounts reveal a systemic failure to engage in active listening, often minimizing the experiential knowledge that families develop through daily caregiving. In some cases, such as M7’s, hasty clinical decisions made under pressure—like premature hospital discharge—ultimately shift the burden of managing complications back onto the family.
Collectively, these narratives highlight that caregivers take on an active, technically informed, and emotionally demanding role within a system that frequently fails to recognize them as integral to the care process. In the face of institutional unpreparedness to manage rare diseases like NM, it is the families—through their lived experience, commitment, and capacity to act—who uphold a significant part of emergency care delivery (See Table 5).

Theme 4. From Emergency to Intensive Care: Challenges to Ensuring Continuity of Care

Emergency care for children with NM is not an isolated event but often marks the beginning of a complex clinical journey. Admissions to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are frequently an inevitable extension of these acute episodes, during which families assume the role of expert observers and medical decisions must be made quickly. P3 describes how emergency visits became a recurring prelude to PICU admissions, eventually forming part of a routine in which they learned to navigate hospital procedures, equipment, and dynamics.
Respiratory complications are one of the main reasons for admission. M1 recounts how, following a cannula change, her daughter developed persistent tachycardia, prompting an emergency visit. There, she was diagnosed with a collapsed lung secondary to bronchomalacia, leading to immediate PICU admission. Similarly, P4 reports several episodes of respiratory failure and ventilator malfunction that also required intensive care.
Even when these admissions become familiar, their emotional impact does not diminish. M8’s testimony reveals the life-threatening fragility of these children: during a PICU stay, she witnessed her daughter "go lifeless," in her words. The medical team’s rapid intervention was essential to reverse the situation, but the fear and vulnerability of that moment left a lasting mark. In a similar vein, M7 describes not only the urgency of her child's respiratory decompensation but also the ongoing emotional toll of the process. She characterizes the experience as “very, very traumatic” and details the subsequent medical decisions they faced: PEG placement, a failed extubation attempt, and ultimately, a tracheostomy. Her story illustrates how a single emergency can trigger a cascade of interventions that profoundly reshape family life (See Table 6).

4. Discussion

The findings of our study reveal that the home becomes the primary, and often only, setting for emergency medical care for children with NM. In this context, parents—especially mothers—are the first to attend to their children in urgent situations without the support of healthcare professionals. This situation aligns with the results of Satchell et al., who found that families act as first responders and coordinators in emergency situations, assuming a high emotional and caregiving burden [29]. In this regard, the role of the informal caregiver not only requires specialized technical skills but also has a significant impact on the mental health of those performing it. Along these lines, Yao et al. report that more than 70% of informal caregivers experience a high level of burden, accompanied by symptoms of anxiety, depression, and chronic stress, which directly affects their physical and emotional well-being [30]. These data underscore the urgent need to implement structured psychological support interventions specifically aimed at family caregivers facing highly complex care situations in the home setting.
Moreover, parents described inadequate responses from emergency services, attributed to the lack of specific protocols and limited training of personnel in neuromuscular diseases. In this regard, Racca et al. propose the implementation of emergency cards containing essential clinical information about the condition and the patient’s individual needs as a corrective measure, thus facilitating faster, more effective, and personalized care [31]. In the absence of immediate professional support, parents developed advanced skills to identify subtle clinical signs and make critical decisions in the daily management of the disease. As highlighted by Baker and Claridge, mothers take on an active role that turns them into true experts in their children's medical condition, acting as primary advocates in both clinical and educational settings, and facing with resilience the many challenges posed by caring for a complex chronic illness [32].
In turn, the use of medical technology in our study improved the care of children within the home but also transferred complex clinical responsibilities to families, requiring ongoing training, emergency response capacity, and appropriate technical support. The existing literature consistently highlights that many parents acquire advanced competencies in managing devices such as ventilators and tracheostomies [33,34], often facing high levels of stress in critical situations without sufficient professional support [35,36]. These conditions emphasize the need to establish emergency protocols and specialized support networks [37,38]. Another particularly relevant finding is the constant vigilance of parents, who developed the ability to identify subtle clinical signs and anticipate decompensations. This home-based monitoring enabled early detection of significant changes, contributing to the prevention of hospitalizations [39]. However, constant caregiving by parents can result in a high emotional burden, manifested as anxiety, fatigue, and isolation. Recent studies have documented this impact; for example, Toledano-Toledano and Luna identified caregivers with high levels of stress, anxiety, and limited family support during hospitalizations [40], while Cormican and Dowling emphasized how the caregiving role transforms daily life and generates profound emotional isolation [41]. These findings underscore the urgent need to address the psychosocial needs of caregiving families.
Our study showed that visits to pediatric emergency departments generate tension and vulnerability for parents due to the lack of preparedness of healthcare professionals in dealing with NM, forcing them to act as intermediaries between the physician and the child. Pelentsov et al. warn that caregivers of children with rare diseases acquire valuable clinical knowledge through their daily experiences, but this expertise is often disregarded in hospital settings, potentially leading to clinical errors and delays in care [42]. Verberne et al. note that the exclusion of caregivers’ knowledge in critical situations increases anxiety and a sense of clinical helplessness [43]. Boivin et al. emphasize the importance of recognizing caregivers as “co-producers” of clinical knowledge, given their key role in the early identification of signs that protocols may overlook [44]. Carel & Kidd describe this phenomenon as a form of “epistemic injustice,” in which the caregiver’s voice is systematically devalued, revealing an imbalance in care where clinical responsibilities are delegated without proper support or recognition [45]. Furthermore, the lack of specific training among emergency staff regarding rare diseases such as NM can lead to diagnostic delays, treatment errors, and an overreliance on parental judgment, all of which negatively impact caregivers’ mental health [46]. The absence of specific protocols for neuromuscular diseases in emergency services remains one of the main barriers to adequate care for these patients [47].
Finally, the transition from the emergency department to the PICU represents a critical moment in the clinical management of children with NM, given the frequent onset of various health complications. For many families, hospital admissions become recurrent and a familiar experience. Admission to the PICU not only involves increasing clinical complexity but also significantly heightens parental distress [48]. In this setting, families must quickly assume an active role in care, acquiring essential technical skills for managing medical devices. This learning process, while necessary, unfolds in an atmosphere of high tension and anxiety. According to Brødsgaard et al., [49] and Lean et al., [48] training in complex care during hospitalization is essential to ensure a safe transition home, turning the PICU into a space not only of high emotional burden but also of intensive learning for families. This educational process becomes even more relevant during prolonged hospitalizations, where caregivers must rapidly acquire technical competencies within a limited timeframe [50]. In parallel, the literature supports the active involvement of parents in the PICU, positioning it within the Family-Centered Care model. This approach promotes the inclusion of caregivers in clinical decision-making and care delivery, recognizing their experiential knowledge and their crucial role in ensuring the hospitalized child’s safety. According to Butler et al., such collaboration improves the quality of care, enhances early detection of complications, and helps mitigate the emotional impact of hospitalization for both children and their families [51]. Ultimately, admission to the PICU is experienced as a traumatic event, marked by urgency, fear, and significant clinical decisions, such as the placement of a PEG or a tracheostomy, that profoundly disrupt daily life. This experience reinforces that the PICU represents not only an increase in clinical complexity but also an intense emotional transition, in which collaboration between healthcare professionals and families is essential to sustain care and humanize the healthcare process.
This study presents several limitations that should be considered. As a qualitative investigation with a small sample focused on a specific healthcare context (Spain), the results are not generalizable; however, they do offer a deep understanding of family experiences. The predominance of mothers as participants may limit the diversity of perspectives, and the use of interviews may have been influenced by emotional or relational factors. Additionally, the absence of healthcare professionals’ perspectives restricts a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical management of NM.
Among the main implications for clinical practice emerging from our study is the urgent need to establish specific emergency protocols for neuromuscular diseases, as well as to improve the training of healthcare personnel in emergency and PICU settings, valuing caregivers’ experiential knowledge within the care process. Similarly, the importance of implementing comprehensive programs that combine technical training, emotional support, and ongoing assistance networks is emphasized—positioning both the home and the PICU as key settings for care and learning.
In line with these implications, several lines of research are proposed to enhance clinical practice and inform public policy design. These include analyzing the impact of psychosocial interventions on informal caregivers, evaluating clinical tools such as emergency cards, and studying the parental training process during prolonged hospitalizations. Additionally, it would be valuable to explore how caregivers’ experiential knowledge could be formally integrated into care and decision-making processes. Finally, multicenter research is recommended to analyze variations in the management of NM across different autonomous communities, in order to identify best practices and reduce territorial disparities in access to specialized care.

5. Conclusions

This study underscores the central role that parents play in emergency care and the home-based management of children diagnosed with NM. In the absence of structured healthcare protocols and immediate professional support, caregivers assume the role of first responders, clinical decision-makers, and long-term providers of complex medical care. Their ability to detect subtle signs of clinical deterioration, respond to life-threatening situations, and manage essential medical equipment demonstrates a level of clinical expertise that remains largely unacknowledged by the healthcare system.
Families face significant emotional, physical, and logistical burdens, intensified by structural deficiencies such as insufficient training of healthcare professionals in rare diseases, diagnostic delays, and unequal access to specialized services. Despite these challenges, parents exhibit remarkable resilience and unwavering dedication, developing advanced caregiving skills under high-stress conditions.

Author Contributions

RMA: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis. JFVG: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing. EPC: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Review & Editing. AMM: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Review & Editing.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee for Medicinal Products of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (code: NEMALINICA_ENF, approved on 18 October 2021).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to confidentiality agreements and ethical restrictions involving identifiable personal information. However, the data may be made available by the authors upon reasonable request, provided that appropriate measures are taken to ensure the anonymity and privacy of the participating families.

Public Involvement Statement

As the initial interviews progressed, the question guide was progressively refined to better align with the study objectives and to deepen the exploration of emerging themes.

Guidelines and Standards Statement

This manuscript was drafted in accordance with recognized reporting guidelines for qualitative research, including the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR)

Use of Artificial Intelligence

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (developed by OpenAI) solely to enhance the clarity and language of the text. Following its use, the authors thoroughly reviewed and carefully edited the content, taking full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Asociación Yo Nemalínica and all participating families for generously sharing their time, experiences, and trust throughout this study. Their contributions were essential to the development of this research. We also acknowledge the support provided by the Red Cross University School of Nursing (Autonomous University of Madrid) and the Department of Nursing at the Complutense University of Madrid for facilitating the academic and technical framework of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nguengang Wakap, S.; Lambert, D.M.; Olry, A.; et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: Analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 28, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Haendel M, Vasilevsky N, Unni D, Bologa C, Harris N, Rehm H, et al. How many rare diseases are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(2):77–78. [CrossRef]
  3. Lehtokari VL, Similä M, Tammepuu M, Wallgren-Pettersson C, Strang-Karlsson S, Hiekkala S. Self-reported functioning among patients with ultra-rare nemaline myopathy or a related disorder in Finland: a pilot study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):374. [CrossRef]
  4. Yuen M, Sandaradura SA, Dowling JJ, Kostyukova AS, Moroz N, Quinlan KG, et al. Leiomodin-3 dysfunction results in thin filament disorganization and nemaline myopathy. J Clin Invest. 2014 Nov;124(11):4693–708. Erratum in: J Clin Invest. 2015 Jan;125(1):456–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI80057. [CrossRef]
  5. Ravenscroft G, Miyatake S, Lehtokari VL, Todd EJ, Vornanen P, Yau KS, et al. Mutations in KLHL40 are a frequent cause of severe autosomal-recessive nemaline myopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul 11;93(1):6–18. [CrossRef]
  6. Polastri M, Schifino G, Tonveronachi E, Tavalazzi F. Respiratory treatment in a patient with nemaline myopathy. Clin Pract. 2019 Dec 19;9(4):1209. [CrossRef]
  7. Argov Z, de Visser M. Dysphagia in adult myopathies. Neuromuscul Disord. 2021 Jan;31(1):5–20. [CrossRef]
  8. Finsterer J, Stöllberger C. Review of cardiac disease in nemaline myopathy. Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Dec;53(6):473–7. [CrossRef]
  9. Alhammadi F, Mohammed AM, Hamad M, Al-Tamimi M. Respiratory failure in a patient with late-onset nemaline myopathy: a case report. Respir Med Case Rep. 2022;37:101651. https://www.nmd-journal.com/article/S0960-8966(22)00194-8/fulltext.
  10. Wang CH, Dowling JJ, North K, Schroth MK, Sejersen T, Shapiro F, et al. Consensus statement on standard of care for congenital myopathies. J Child Neurol. 2012 Mar;27(3):363–82. [CrossRef]
  11. Benedetto L, Musumeci O, Giordano A, Porcino M, Ingrassia M. Assessment of parental needs and quality of life in children with a rare neuromuscular disease (Pompe disease): a quantitative-qualitative study. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;13(12):956. [CrossRef]
  12. Witt S, Schuett K, Wiegand-Grefe S, Boettcher J, Quitmann J. Living with a rare disease—experiences and needs in pediatric patients and their parents. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):242. [CrossRef]
  13. Buckle N, Doyle O, Kodate N, Somanadhan S. The economic impact of living with a rare disease for children and their families: a scoping review. Health Policy. 2023;127(5):575–86. [CrossRef]
  14. Creswell, JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.
  15. Carpenter C, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
  16. Klem NR, Smith A, Shields N, Bunzli S. Demystifying qualitative research for musculoskeletal practitioners Part 1: what is qualitative research and how can it help practitioners deliver best-practice musculoskeletal care? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(11):531–2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34719941/.
  17. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. [CrossRef]
  18. Asociación Yo Nemalínica. Inicio. Available from: https://www.yonemalinica.org/ [Accessed 26 May 2025].
  19. García-Armesto S, Abaitua I, Durán A, Hernández-Quevedo C. Spain: Health System Summary. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2024. Available from: https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/hit-summaries-no-flags/hit-summary-spain-2024-2p.pdf.
  20. Gimenez-Lozano C, Páramo-Rodríguez L, Cavero-Carbonell C, Corpas-Burgos F, López-Maside A, Guardiola-Vilarroig S, et al. Rare diseases: needs and impact for patients and families: a cross-sectional study in the Valencian Region, Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10366. [CrossRef]
  21. Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18. [CrossRef]
  22. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907. [CrossRef]
  23. Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:1–8. [CrossRef]
  24. Hernán-García M, Lineros-González C, Ruiz-Azarola A. How to adapt qualitative research to confinement contexts. Gac Sanit. 2020. Advance online publication. [CrossRef]
  25. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2018.
  26. Giorgi, A. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh (PA): Duquesne University Press; 2009.
  27. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51. [CrossRef]
  28. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24:120–4.
  29. Satchell E, Carey M, Dicker B, Drake H, Gott M, Moeke-Maxwell T, et al. Family & bystander experiences of emergency ambulance services care: a scoping review. BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):68. [CrossRef]
  30. Yao H, Li K, Li C, Hu S, Huang Z, Chen J, et al. Caregiving burden, depression, and anxiety in informal caregivers of people with mental illness in China: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):824. [CrossRef]
  31. Racca F, Sansone VA, Ricci F, Filosto M, Pedroni S, Mazzone E, et al. Emergencies cards for neuromuscular disorders: 1st Consensus Meeting from UILDM - Italian Muscular Dystrophy Association Workshop report. Acta Myol. 2022 Dec 31;41(4):135–77. [CrossRef]
  32. Baker K, Claridge AM. "I have a Ph.D. in my daughter": mother and child experiences of living with childhood chronic illness. J Child Fam Stud. 2022 Dec 12:1–12. Epub ahead of print. [CrossRef]
  33. Somanadhan S, McAneney H, Awan A, McNulty S, Sweeney A, Buckle N, et al. Assessing the supportive care needs of parents of children with rare diseases in Ireland. J Pediatr Nurs. 2025;81:31–42. [CrossRef]
  34. Ronan S, Brown M, Marsh L. Parents’ experiences of transition from hospital to home of a child with complex health needs: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(17–18):3222–35. [CrossRef]
  35. Gong S, Wang X, Wang Y, Qu Y, Tang C, Yu Q, et al. A descriptive qualitative study of home care experiences in parents of children with tracheostomies. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;45:7–12. [CrossRef]
  36. Mah JK, Thannhauser JE, McNeil DA, Dewey D. Being the lifeline: the parent experience of caring for a child with neuromuscular disease on home mechanical ventilation. Neuromuscul Disord. 2008;18(12):983–8. [CrossRef]
  37. Leske V, Guerdile MJ, Gonzalez A, Testoni F, Aguerre V. Feasibility of a pediatric long-term Home Ventilation Program in Argentina: 11 years’ experience. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(3):780–7. [CrossRef]
  38. Adachi T, El-Hattab AW, Jain R, Nogales Crespo KA, Quirland Lazo CI, Scarpa M, et al. Enhancing equitable access to rare disease diagnosis and treatment around the world: a review of evidence, policies, and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4732. [CrossRef]
  39. Coller RJ, Lerner CF, Berry JG, Klitzner TS, Allshouse C, Warner G, et al. Linking parent confidence and hospitalization through mobile health: a multisite pilot study. J Pediatr. 2021;230:207–14.e1. [CrossRef]
  40. Toledano-Toledano F, Luna D. The psychosocial profile of family caregivers of children with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study. Biopsychosoc Med. 2020;14:29. [CrossRef]
  41. Cormican O, Dowling M. The hidden psychosocial impact of caregiving with chronic haematological cancers: a qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023;64:102319. [CrossRef]
  42. Pelentsov LJ, Fielder AL, Laws TA, Esterman AJ. The supportive care needs of parents with a child with a rare disease: results of an online survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:88. [CrossRef]
  43. Verberne LM, Schouten-van Meeteren AY, Bosman DK, Colenbrander DA, Jagt CT, Grootenhuis MA, et al. Parental experiences with a paediatric palliative care team: A qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2017;31(10):956–63. [CrossRef]
  44. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Burgers J, Grol R. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: A cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):45. [CrossRef]
  45. Carel H, Kidd IJ. Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophical analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 2014;17(4):529–40. [CrossRef]
  46. Zurynski Y, Friesen CA, Williams K, Elliott EJ; Rare Disease Working Group. Rare disease: A national survey of paediatricians’ experiences and needs. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000172. [CrossRef]
  47. Kao WT, Tseng YH, Jong YJ, Chen TH. Emergency room visits and admission rates of children with neuromuscular disorders: A 10-year experience in a medical center in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2019;60(4):405–10. [CrossRef]
  48. Lean RE, Rogers CE, Paul RA, Gerstein ED. NICU hospitalization: Long-term implications on parenting and child behaviors. Curr Treat Options Pediatr. 2018;4(1):49. [CrossRef]
  49. Brødsgaard A, Pedersen JT, Larsen P, Weis J. Parents’ and nurses’ experiences of partnership in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative review and meta-synthesis. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(17-18):3117–39. [CrossRef]
  50. Hill C, Knafl KA, Docherty S, Santacroce SJ. Parent perceptions of the impact of the PICU environment on delivery of family-centered care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018;50:88. [CrossRef]
  51. Butler AE, Krall F, Shinewald A, Manning JC, Choong K, Dryden-Palmer K. Family-centered care in the PICU: Strengthening partnerships in pediatric critical care medicine. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024;25(12):1192–8. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main findings by them.
Figure 1. Main findings by them.
Preprints 161223 g001
Table 1. Question guide.
Table 1. Question guide.
Research Areas and Questions
Parental Emergency Management: This area explores how parents handle critical situations at home without immediate professional support, and how this impacts their caregiving experience and their role as first responders. Interview questions: Could you describe an emergency situation you experienced with your child at home? How did you respond? Did you feel technically and emotionally prepared to act in those situations? What helped you—or what did you feel was missing? How did you experience the hospital transfer during those critical moments? What emotions do you recall from that time?
Home-Based Response to Clinical Deterioration: This area aims to understand how families identify warning signs, make decisions, and cope with the emotional and technical implications of managing clinical decline in the home setting. Interview questions: Have you ever noticed signs of deterioration in your child’s health? How did you know it was time to act? What tools or devices do you use to monitor your child? How do they influence your decision-making? Have you experienced failures of medical equipment at home? How did you manage the situation? How have you experienced moments when you had to intervene in response to a potential clinical decline?
Parental Involvement in Pediatric Emergency Care: This area examines how parents take on an active role during hospital emergencies, compensate for system shortcomings, and face the emotional challenge of not being fully recognized as part of the care team. Interview questions: What has your experience been like during emergency visits with your child?To what extent have you been involved in your child’s care during those episodes?Have you ever had to explain your child’s condition or instruct professionals on how to act? How did you handle that situation?What do you think healthcare professionals should understand about your role as a caregiver in emergency situations?
Transition from Emergency Care to the PICU: This area explores how families experience the transition from the emergency department to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), how they cope with the emotional impact, and how they take on an active role in medical decision-making. Interview questions: How did you experience your child’s transition from the emergency department to the PICU?What emotions did you feel during the admission? How did it affect you and your family?To what extent were you involved in the decision-making process?Could you describe any intervention or procedure that marked a turning point in your child’s clinical progression?
Throughout the interviews, researchers employed prompts and probes as needed to deepen the discussion. These included encouraging participants to elaborate, maintaining the conversational flow, clarifying unclear statements through paraphrasing, and demonstrating active listening. Examples of such prompts included: “Could you tell me more about that?”, “Have you experienced something similar since?”, and “That’s really interesting—please go on.”
Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics of the parents.
Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics of the parents.
Marital Status Married 64,7% Single 29,4% Divorced 5,9%
Number of Children 1 child: 41,2% 2 children: 41,2% 3 children: 17,6%
Child’s Sex 50% Female 50% Male
Type of Residence 70,6% Urban 17,6% Rural 11,8% Semi-urban
Housing Tenure 88,2% Owned 11,8% Social housing
Vehicle Ownership 70,6% Yes 29,4% No
Educational Attainment 70,6% University 17,6%Vocational training 11,8% Secondary
Employment Status 5,9% Homemaker 5,9% Unemployed 17,6% Parental leave
Monthly Household Income 41,2%
≥2000 €
29,4%
1500 - 2000 €
17,6%
1000 - 1500 €
11,8%
≤1000 €
Table 3. Parental narratives on emergency management.
Table 3. Parental narratives on emergency management.
Theme 1
Alone in the face of an emergency:“…if you’re in the hospital, you try to solve it, and if not, you press a button and the nurse comes running. At home, you can’t press a button—you’re alone with yourself.” (M1)
Home accident and resuscitation: “H2 was taking a bath, I was alone with both kids, his sister was playing and pulled his hand, and he fell with his head into the water. I don’t know how I reacted so fast—I called 112, put the phone on speaker; he turned very purple and I couldn’t find a pulse, so I started doing chest compressions. H2 came back, his color improved. I kept talking to them, explaining everything. They sent an ambulance; meanwhile, I placed the BiPAP and his oxygen started going up—by the time they arrived, it was at 88–90.” (P2)
Dramatic transfer on the highway:“…she became very unstable at the hospital, and the transfer could be risky—even they were uncertain. We were driving ahead in our car, and the ambulance was following behind. At one point, the ambulance just stopped in the middle of the highway. It was very dramatic.” (P5)
Desperation and a miracle:“…I called the ambulance in a panic… we were so nervous, so scared, I told the person on the phone, please, my daughter is dying. A doctor came who had no idea what to do, gave her oxygen, and we transferred her to the PICU—they told us she had been saved by a miracle.” (M8)
Table 4. Parental Narratives on home-based responses to clinical deterioration.
Table 4. Parental Narratives on home-based responses to clinical deterioration.
Theme 2
Life-saving intuition: “If I hadn’t been so stubborn, my daughter wouldn’t be here. They wanted to send her home, but I kept saying something wasn’t right—I refused to leave. Soon after, her heart rate started climbing, her oxygen dropped, and she went into cardiac arrest. They had to resuscitate her. That image is burned into my memory, no matter how much I want to forget it.” (M4)
CO₂ retention:“One day I took her to school, and she fell asleep. When we realized it, her fingernails were blue—she was running out of oxygen. She had been retaining CO₂ for nearly a month. That was her first hospital admission. At two years old, her oxygen dropped to 65 and her CO₂ went up to 210. She was asleep for four days in the PICU.” (M4)
Dangerously low oxygen saturation:“At home, my daughter said she felt anxious, unwell, hadn’t wanted to eat for days, just wanted to lie down—she was very tired. I checked her with the pulse oximeter, and she was at 68.” (M8)
Ventilator failure:“H3 had a crisis, and the ventilator disconnected. It failed, and by the time we noticed, he was already desaturating.” (P3)
Home bronchoaspiration:“Many times I would insert the feeding tube through his nose, and I didn’t know if it was reaching his stomach… He choked twice—one of them was really serious. I was alone and thought he wasn’t going to make it… he started aspirating until it turned into aspiration pneumonia.” (M7)
CPR at home:“I’ve never experienced anything worse in my life. I was doing chest compressions, and he was turning grey. I kept thinking, ‘Oh my God, this can’t be happening to me, please.’ I completely broke down when the ambulance arrived—I cried all the way to the hospital. If another parent didn’t know how to react in that moment, their child wouldn’t survive.” (M2)
Table 5. Parental narratives on involvement in pediatric emergency care.
Table 5. Parental narratives on involvement in pediatric emergency care.
Theme 3
Active role in the emergency department: “We go to the emergency room a lot, and we know what needs to be said—you know when things are going wrong.” (M1)
Clinical translator: “Sometimes I can tell the staff feels relieved when I explain everything clearly… I tell them the name of the disease, what could happen, and then they act more calmly. It’s like I’m translating what’s happening for them.” (M1)
Unprepared professional:“They sent a pediatrician from the health center who didn’t know anything about NM and told me there was nothing he could do—it devastated me. He was unable to help.” (M8)
Misdiagnosis: “They told us it was just gastroenteritis… but it was actually a bowel obstruction. By the time they realized, it was too late… she ended up in emergency surgery.” (M8)
Underestimation of respiratory distress: “I kept telling them my child’s oxygen was low, and the doctor said he was fine. Then they used the pulse oximeter, and it read 88 and dropping… that’s when they realized he wasn’t doing as well as they thought.” (M9)
Premature discharge:“…we went into the ER in very, very bad shape. The ER was overwhelmed, and they discharged us. The trip home was awful—it was so hard because I could see my son’s lips changing color, but I had no idea what was happening… something told me that color wasn’t normal…” (M7)
Table 6. Parental narratives on transition from emergency care to the PICU.
Table 6. Parental narratives on transition from emergency care to the PICU.
Theme 4
Frequent readmissions:“Being readmitted felt like coming home—you’d arrive at the PICU, and they treated you like one of their own. After so much time there, you know how everything works.” (P3)
From the ER to the PICU:“After a cannula change, she came home with severe tachycardia. I called the complex chronic care unit, and they told us to come back. We went through the ER, and from there straight to the PICU… her left lung had collapsed… it was bronchomalacia in the upper left bronchus.” (M1)
Respiratory failure and ventilator malfunction: “Her more severe symptoms started around age two… she had several PICU admissions up to age three—three or four very serious episodes of respiratory failure, and also problems with the ventilator.” (P4)
Emotional impact: “She had a PICU admission where she just went lifeless… Thank goodness they were there, they reacted immediately, and later the nurses told us how bad it really was.” (M8)
A traumatic admission: “A PICU admission is very, very, very traumatic—until everything stabilizes… that’s when they scheduled the PEG. There was a failed extubation attempt, and in the end, of course, a tracheostomy and invasive ventilation.” (M7)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated