Preprint
Communication

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Single-Crystal X-Ray Diffraction Study of CuN2 at 50 GPa

Submitted:

20 May 2025

Posted:

21 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We report single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for the CuN2 phase at 50 GPa. CuN2 crystallizes in a hexagonal structure with lattice parameters: a = 2.692(1) Å, and c = 7.199(2) Å, belonging to the space group P63/mmc, consistent with previous powder diffraction studies. The N-N bond length is determined to be 1.19(1) Å, indicating a double bond between nitrogen atoms under these conditions. Using an empirical equation to estimate the formal charge, we calculate the copper oxidation state to be approximately +1.2. This study highlights the importance of single-crystal X-ray diffraction in precisely determining crystal structures and intermolecular distances under high-pressure conditions.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Transition metal nitrides have attracted significant research attention as potential high-energy density materials (HEDMs).[1,2,3,4,5] Copper nitrides, in particular, have been investigated as HEDMs up to 50 GPa, where the CuN2 phase has been previously observed.[6] However, the limitations of powder X-ray diffraction, such as difficulties in accurately determining oxidation states and N–N bond lengths, have led researchers to rely on density functional theory (DFT) calculations to infer these properties.[6] In contrast, single-crystal X-ray diffraction provides superior precision in resolving crystal structures and atomic positions, especially for compounds synthesized under high- pressure conditions.[7,8] The N-N bond length in polynitrides significantly influences related physical properties such as metallicity and bulk modulus.[2,7] Therefore, single-crystal X-ray diffraction of the CuN2 phase is essential for elucidating its crystal chemistry under high-pressure conditions.

2. Results

Using powder diffraction, the crystal structure of CuN₂ was indexed to a hexagonal phase with lattice parameters a = 2.70(1) Å and c = 7.21(1) Å at 50 GPa as determined with UNITCELL.[9] These results are based on X-ray diffraction data presented in Figure 1. The starting materials, copper and nitrogen, were also identified in the diffraction patterns.[10] The refined crystal structure of CuN2, resolved using single-crystal X-ray diffraction, is shown in Figure 2. The refined crystallographic data for CuN₂ at 50 GPa are presented in Table 1.

3. Discussion

Our single-crystal X-ray diffraction results are generally consistent with previous powder X-ray diffraction studies conducted at similar pressures.[6] We confirmed the crystal structure and atomic bonding in the CuN₂ phase. However, unlike powder diffraction, single-crystal X-ray diffraction allows for precise determination of bond distances. The N–N bond length was determined to be 1.19(1) Å, suggesting the presence of a (N-N)2- unit.[2,7] This value closely matches DFT calculations, which report an N–N bond length of 1.197 Å.[6] Additionally, the Cu–N bond distance was determined to be 1.97(1) Å. No evidence of a Jahn–Teller distortion was observed, indicating that the oxidation state of copper in CuN₂ is likely not +2. Given the critical role of N–N bonding in determining the oxidation state of copper and the physical properties of polynitrides—such as metallicity and bulk modulus—we estimated the copper oxidation state using an empirical equation.[2] The equation relates N–N bond length (BL) to the formal charge (FC) of the N₂ⁿ⁻ unit: BL = 0.074(1) Å · FC + 1.104 Å. Using the measured N–N bond length of 1.19(1) Å for CuN₂ at 50 GPa, we calculate the formal charge of the N–N unit to be approximately –1.2(1). This value is consistent with DFT calculations, which estimate the copper oxidation state to lie between +1 and +2.[6]

4. Materials and Methods

Diamond anvil cell experiments: A rhenium (Re) gasket was indented, and a center hole was drilled to form a sample chamber. The indented gasket was placed between two opposing diamond anvils. Copper metal was loaded into the sample chamber, and high-purity nitrogen gas was then introduced using the gas-loading system at the Earth and Planetary Laboratory (EPL), Carnegie Science. The DAC was then compressed to target pressures for subsequent laser heating.
Laser heating experiments were conducted at EPL. In a typical experiment, an infrared laser was directed onto the sample, and X-ray diffraction data were collected after laser heating. The X-ray wavelength used was 0.3738 Å at beamline ID27 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF).[11] Two-dimensional diffraction images were integrated into one-dimensional patterns using Dioptas[12] software. We used 1s exposure time for collecting powder X-ray diffraction patterns. A 1-second exposure time was used for collecting powder X-ray diffraction patterns. The resulting diffraction patterns were plotted using Peakpo.[13]
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were acquired from selected spots after laser heating. The diamond anvil cell was rotated up to ±30° to collect single-crystal diffraction data. Orthoenstatite crystals were used to calibrate the single-crystal diffraction setup. The orthoenstatite, with the composition (Mg1.93Fe0.06)(Si1.93Al0.06)O6 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group, Pbca with lattice parameters a = 8.812(1) Å, b = 5.183(1) Å, and c = 18.239(1) Å. Data integration and reduction were performed using CrysAlisPro.[14,15] The crystal structure was solved using Olex2 with the intrinsic phasing method.[15,16] The atomic position of Cu was resolved, and electron density maps were examined for residual electron density, which was interpreted as potential nitrogen positions. The structure was refined iteratively until the calculated and observed single-crystal X-ray diffraction patterns were in agreement. A typical weighted R-factor (Rwp) of less than 10% was achieved, indicating a reliable structural fit.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, HC, AFG and MFM.; methodology, GG and MM.; software, AFG.; validation HC, AFG and MFM.; formal analysis, HC.; investigation, HC.; resources, MFM.; data curation, AFG.; writing—original draft preparation, HC.; writing—review and editing, AFG.; visualization, HC.; supervision, AFG.; project administration, AFG and MFM.; funding acquisition, AFG and MFM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DMR-2200670, CHE-2302437 (PIs: Mohammad F. Mahmood and Alexander F. Goncharov).

Data Availability Statement

Deposition Numbers 2444907 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DMR-2200670, CHE-2302437 (PIs: Mohammad F. Mahmood and Alexander F. Goncharov) and Carnegie Science. We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), beamline ID27, for the provision of synchrotron radiation facilities under proposal numbers MA5485, CH6476, CH6817.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bykov, M.; Bykova, E.; Aprilis, G.; Glazyrin, K.; Koemets, E.; Chuvashova, I.; Kupenko, I.; McCammon, C.; Mezouar, M.; Prakapenka, V.; et al. Fe-N System at High Pressure Reveals a Compound Featuring Polymeric Nitrogen Chains. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aslandukov, A.; Aslandukova, A.; Laniel, D.; Koemets, I.; Fedotenko, T.; Yuan, L.; Steinle-Neumann, G.; Glazyrin, K.; Hanfland, M.; Dubrovinsky, L.; et al. High-Pressure Yttrium Nitride, Y5N14, Featuring Three Distinct Types of Nitrogen Dimers. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 18077–18084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Laniel, D.; Dewaele, A.; Garbarino, G. High Pressure and High Temperature Synthesis of the Iron Pernitride FeN2. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 6245–6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laniel, D.; Winkler, B.; Koemets, E.; Fedotenko, T.; Bykov, M.; Bykova, E.; Dubrovinsky, L.; Dubrovinskaia, N. Synthesis of Magnesium-Nitrogen Salts of Polynitrogen Anions. Nat Commun 2019, 10, 4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Niwa, K.; Terabe, T.; Kato, D.; Takayama, S.; Kato, M.; Soda, K.; Hasegawa, M. Highly Coordinated Iron and Cobalt Nitrides Synthesized at High Pressures and High Temperatures. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6410–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Binns, J.; Donnelly, M.-E.; Peña-Alvarez, M.; Wang, M.; Gregoryanz, E.; Hermann, A.; Dalladay-Simpson, P.; Howie, R.T. Direct Reaction between Copper and Nitrogen at High Pressures and Temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Laniel, D.; Winkler, B.; Fedotenko, T.; Aslandukova, A.; Aslandukov, A.; Vogel, S.; Meier, T.; Bykov, M.; Chariton, S.; Glazyrin, K.; et al. High-Pressure Na3(N2)4, Ca3(N2)4, Sr3(N2)4, and Ba(N2)3 Featuring Nitrogen Dimers with Noninteger Charges and Anion-Driven Metallicity. Phys. Rev. Materials 2022, 6, 023402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aslandukov, A.; Trybel, F.; Aslandukova, A.; Laniel, D.; Fedotenko, T.; Khandarkhaeva, S.; Aprilis, G.; Giacobbe, C.; Lawrence Bright, E.; Abrikosov, I.A.; et al. Anionic N18 Macrocycles and a Polynitrogen Double Helix in Novel Yttrium Polynitrides YN6 and Y2N11 at 100 GPa. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Holland, T.J.B.; Redfern, S.A.T. UNITCELL : A Nonlinear Least-Squares Program for Cell-Parameter Refinement and Implementing Regression and Deletion Diagnostics. J Appl Crystallogr 1997, 30, 84–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laniel, D.; Trybel, F.; Aslandukov, A.; Spender, J.; Ranieri, U.; Fedotenko, T.; Glazyrin, K.; Bright, E.L.; Chariton, S.; Prakapenka, V.B.; et al. Structure Determination of ζ-N2 from Single-Crystal X-Ray Diffraction and Theoretical Suggestion for the Formation of Amorphous Nitrogen. Nat Commun 2023, 14, 6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Garbarino, G.; Hanfland, M.E.; Gallego-Parra, S.; Rosa, A.D.; Mezouar, M.; Duran, D.; Martel, K.; Papillon, E.; Roth, T.; Got, P.; et al. Extreme Conditions X-Ray Diffraction and Imaging Beamline ID15B on the ESRF Extremely Brilliant Source. High Pressure Research 2024, 44, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prescher, C.; Prakapenka, V.B. DIOPTAS: A Program for Reduction of Two-Dimensional X-Ray Diffraction Data and Data Exploration. High Pressure Research 2015, 35, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shim, S.-H. PeakPo - A Python Software for X-Ray Diffraction Analysis at High Pressure and High Temperature; 2017;
  14. Oxford Diffraction Ltd. Yarnton, England 2009.
  15. Sheldrick, G.M. A Short History of SHELX. Acta Cryst A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT – Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern and corresponding 2D diffraction (“cake”) images collected after laser heating. The pattern is indexed to CuN₂ (red), ε-nitrogen (minor peaks not indexed in the image), and unreacted copper (blue).
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern and corresponding 2D diffraction (“cake”) images collected after laser heating. The pattern is indexed to CuN₂ (red), ε-nitrogen (minor peaks not indexed in the image), and unreacted copper (blue).
Preprints 160319 g001
Figure 2. Crystal structure of CuN2 at 50 GPa. Blue octahedra represents Cu-N coordination, with each Cu atom surrounded by six nitrogen atoms. The N-N bond is shown in light blue. The Cu-N bond length is 1.97(1) Å.
Figure 2. Crystal structure of CuN2 at 50 GPa. Blue octahedra represents Cu-N coordination, with each Cu atom surrounded by six nitrogen atoms. The N-N bond is shown in light blue. The Cu-N bond length is 1.97(1) Å.
Preprints 160319 g002
Table 1. Crystal structure parameters and refinement statistics for CuN₂ obtained from single-crystal X-ray diffraction at 50 GPa.
Table 1. Crystal structure parameters and refinement statistics for CuN₂ obtained from single-crystal X-ray diffraction at 50 GPa.
Single crystal report for Cu2N4
Formula weight 183.118
Temperature/K 300
Crystal system hexagonal
Space group P63/mmc
a/Å 2.6921(9)
b/Å 2.6921(9)
c/Å 7.1992(16)
α/° 90
β/° 90
γ/° 120
Volume/Å3 45.19(2)
Z 1
ρcalcg/cm3 6.73
μ/mm-1 3.997
F(000) 86.3
Radiation synchrotron (λ = 0.37380)
2Θ range for data collection/° 12.84 to 40.6
Index ranges -1 ≤ h ≤ 1, -4 ≤ k ≤ 4, -13 ≤ l ≤ 12
Independent reflections 23 [Rint = 0.5167, Rsigma = 0.2578]
Data/restraints/parameters 23/0/5
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.408
Final R indexes [I>=2σ (I)] R1 = 0.0836, wR2 = 0.2064
Final R indexes [all data] R1 = 0.0895, wR2 = 0.3216
Fractional Atomic Coordinates (×104) and Equivalent Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å2×103)
Atom x y z U(eq)
N 3333 -3333 6676(13) 8(2)
Cu 0 0 5000 33(3)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated