Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Challenges of Organic Amendments: Impact of Vermicompost Leachate and Biochar on Popcorn maize in Saline Soil

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

08 May 2025

Posted:

09 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Organic amendments offer a sustainable strategy to enhance soil quality in degraded environments, while also contribute to reducing greenhouse gas generation and implementing a green economy. This study evaluated the comparative effects of two organic amendments—vermicompost leachate and biochar—on the performance of Popcorn maize (Zea mays L. var. everta) grown under saline soil conditions. Four treatments were tested: T0 (Control), T1 (Vermicompost leachate), T2 (Biochar), and T3 (Vermicompost leachate + Biochar), each with 10 replicates arranged in a Completely Random Design (CRD). Although several soil physicochemical, microbiological, and agronomic parameters showed no significant differences compared to the control, biochar application led to notable improvements in soil total organic carbon, microbial community (mesophilic aerobes bacteria, molds, and yeasts), and increased seed length and diameter. In contrast, vermicompost leachate alone had a detrimental effect on plant growth, including reduced leaf area, stem thickness, and grain yield. Notably, grain yield declined by 46% with leachate alone and by 31% when combined with biochar, compared to the control. These results highlight the superior performance of biochar over vermicompost leachate as a soil amendment under saline conditions and underscore the potential risks of broadly applying compost teas in stressed soils. Site-specific assessments and screening for phytotoxins and phytopathogens are recommended before use. Furthermore, the combined use of leachate and biochar may not be advisable under the tested soil characteristics.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Approximately one billion hectares of land worldwide are affected to varying degrees by salinity and related threats. The increasing demand for the expansion of intensive irrigated agriculture, rising temperatures, increased drought frequency, and water scarcity have led to the accumulation of salts in soils irrigated with saline water. These conditions exacerbate salinization, sodication, and high sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), degrading the chemical environment and the physical health of soils [1]. Salinity adversely affects crop growth and yield, posing serious challenges to food security and economic stability in affected regions [2,3]. In Peru, salinization has been reported on approximately 300,000 hectares of irrigated land, with nearly 150,000 hectares exhibiting high salinity levels. It is estimated that around 40% of the total agricultural area along the Peruvian coast is affected by soil salinity [4].
In this context, there is a need to develop sustainable agricultural practices that can improve soil quality in saline environments while contributing to circular economy models. Among such practices, the use of biochar, a stable, carbon-rich byproduct from pyrolysis, has gained attention for its capacity to improve soil health and mitigate environmental stress. Biochar has demonstrated residual effects in reducing sodium (Na⁺) uptake under saline stress conditions, through mechanisms such as Na⁺ sorption, increased soil moisture retention, and the supply of essential nutrients that could reduce Na⁺ uptake by plants [5]. Additionally, its alkaline nature, structural stability, and potential to sequester carbon make it a promising tool for improving agricultural productivity, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and promoting soil regeneration [6].
Similarly, previous studies had mentioned that vermicompost and organic amendments are a cost-effective and sustainable approach to improving soil quality in salt-affected regions and boosting crop yields in areas with severe salinity issues [7,8]. Also, vermicompost is rich in essential nutrients, humic acids, growth-regulating hormones, and enzymes, enhancing plant nutrition, boosting photosynthesis, improving overall crop quality, and offering potential benefits for pest control [9]. In this sense, vermicompost leachate (or “vermiwash”) has demonstrated noticeable effects on plants and soil. It was found to possess properties that function as a liquid organic biofertilizer and a biopesticide [10]. Both amendments originate from agricultural residues, aligning with the principles of circular agriculture by promoting resource efficiency, reducing waste, and enhancing soil resilience.
Nevertheless, despite their benefits, knowledge gaps remain regarding the comparative performance of biochar and vermicompost leachate under salinity stress conditions, especially in coastal agroecosystems. Moreover, potential limitations have been reported. For biochar, ecotoxicological impacts and interactions with soil microbiota, such as negative effects on nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium and phosphorus-mobilizing mycorrhizal fungi, have been observed under arid conditions; however, these may be mitigated when combined with microbial inoculants [11,12]. Although rich in nutrients, Vermicompost may pose environmental risks due to nutrient leaching, unpleasant odors, insect proliferation, and GHG emissions during decomposition, especially when not properly managed [13].
Yellow hard corn is cultivated nearly year-round in Peru, particularly along the Peruvian coast. It is a short-cycle crop with a vegetative period ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 months, depending on the variety and sowing date. Popcorn varieties are characterized by small, round kernels with a soft, starchy core and a hard, glassy outer shell; when heated, the moisture within the starchy core expands and bursts through the hard shell, producing popcorn. These varieties account for less than 1% of global corn production [14]. The consumption of popcorn maize (Zea mays var. everta) in Peru has increased significantly, particularly in recent years, with an annual growth rate of 5,527.6 tons (2016-2020). However, Peru imports popcorn maize from three main countries, in descending order of volume: Argentina, Brazil, and the United States [15].
Considering the growing salinization of coastal agricultural soils and the increasing interest in sustainable crop production, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of two organic amendments—biochar and vermicompost leachate—on soil quality, microbial community, and the growth and yield performance of popcorn maize. The focus was to assess their comparative performance under saline soil conditions and contribute to the understanding of how organic inputs derived from agricultural residues influence crop productivity and soil health in salt-affected environments of the Peruvian coast.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The study was conducted at the Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer Unit in Organic Solid Waste Management of the “Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria” (INIA). The geographic coordinates are 12° 04' 29.2" S, 76° 56' 26.3" W, and the altitude is 241 m.s.n.m.
The greenhouse where the experiment was conducted had the following dimensions: 10.2 x 8 x 2.7 m. Figure 1 shows the climatic values ​​of temperature and relative humidity. The entire crop cycle was from November 2023 to March 2024.

2.2. Substrates, Water, and Seed Characteristics

2.2.1. Soil

Soil from the “Fertilizantes Orgánicos S.A.C” (FOSAC) company located in the Pachacamac district, province, and department of Lima, was used. The geographic coordinates are 12° 13' 34.3" S, 76° 52'37.4" W. Sampling was conducted at a depth of 0 to 20 cm. The soil was then moved to INIA - Lima, and the soil was extended, homogenized, and air-dried for a week. After this time, it was de-clumped and homogenized again.
A sample was analyzed to obtain the soil characterization, which was realized by the “Laboratorio de Análisis de Suelos, Aguas y Foliares” at INIA - Lima (Table 1).
The soil had a sandy loam texture, a slightly alkaline reaction, a low CaCO3 content, and was strongly saline. The organic matter, total carbon, and total organic carbon were low, and the available phosphorus and potassium were high. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was high and had sufficient Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, and Na+ levels. Concerning the metal concentration, the soil would not be contaminated according to Peruvian legislation (Supreme decree N° 011-2017-MINAM); however, it had an elevated concentration of As according to the Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health (> 12 mg kg-1).

2.2.2. Biochar

The technology employed for biochar production was based on Top-Lit UpDraft (TLUD) micro-gasifier and produced from rice husks. This method loads biomass into a combustion chamber and ignites from the top (top-lit). As the combustion progresses downward, pyrolysis gases are released and move upward (updraft) through the unburned biomass. These gases are subsequently combusted in the upper zone of the reactor under limited oxygen conditions. This controlled combustion at 700 °C resulted in the partial conversion of biomass, allowing a solid carbon-rich residue known as biochar. TLUD systems offer several advantages, including high energy efficiency, reduced smoke emissions, low operational costs, and suitability for small-scale or decentralized applications.
This amendment was characterized by a proportion of 1:10 [16], obtaining pH 9.07 and EC 2.473 values.

2.2.3. Vermicompost Leachate

The vermicompost, derived from pre-compost (Cavia porcellus manure and harvest residues), was processed using earthworms (Eisenia foetida). The production bed had a width of 1.75 m, a length of 3.65 m, a depth of 70 cm, a channel of 16 cm, and an outlet of 50 cm. Earthworms were incorporated at a ratio of 1 kg per 4 kg of pre-compost and maintained under composting conditions for three months. Subsequently, the resulting vermicompost was flushed with water to extract the leachate, which was then brewed for 48 hours and collected in the system's reservoir. The characterization was carried out. following a proportion of 1:5 [16], obtaining a pH of 8.40 and an EC of 3.34 dS m-1.

2.2.4. Irrigation Water

The water had an almost constant pH of 7.7 and EC of 0.619 dS m-1.

2.2.5. Plant Material

PMC.S1 x 8-8 maize seeds were used in this study. This is an experimental hybrid resulting from the cross of two S1 lines. PMC is an S1 line derived from commercial popcorn, while 8-8 is another S1 line obtained from a segregating population originating from the cross between the races Kculli x Confite Puneño. These seeds were provided by the Maize Program of the Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM).

2.3. Treatments and Experimental Design

We used 5 L pots, and a volume of 4 L was filled with soil and amendments according to treatments (Table 2).
For T1, the vermicompost leachate was fermented with sugar (40 g) per 2 L of solution for 72 hours, then applied four times, once at the beginning of each week, for one month. The first application occurred one week before sowing. A total volume of 8 L was applied to each pot by the end of the treatment period.
In T2, biochar was mixed into the top 15 cm of soil depth [17], at a rate of 150 g per pot. In T3, biochar (375 g), vermicompost leachate (2 L), and sugar (20 g) were mixed and fermented for 72 hours. The mixture was applied in the same manner as T1, four times over one month. The first application was made one week before sowing, with the subsequent applications carried out around the base of the plant.
The experimental design was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three treatments and one absolute control. Each treatment had ten replicates with two plants per pot, being a total of 40 experimental units.

2.4. Installation Procedure

Each pot was filled with 5.6 kg of air-dried (equivalent to 4 L), previously crumbled soil. Three maize seeds were sown in each pot, and one week after germination, the two most vigorous plants were selected and the third was removed. Each pot received the recommended fertilizer dose for popcorn maize, corresponding to 150-80-100 kg ha⁻¹ of NPK (UNALM Maize Program), using the chemical fertilizers urea, diammonium phosphate, and potassium nitrate, where urea application was split into two doses, and weeds were removed manually. The entire crop cycle was from November 2023 to March 2024.

2.5. Soil Parameters

At harvest, soil from each experimental unit was removed from the pots. Samples were sent to the “Laboratorio de Suelos, Agua y Foliares” at INIA (Lima) for physico-chemical analysis, and to the “Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana y Biotecnología” at UNALM for microbiological analysis.
The physico-chemical analysis included determination of texture using the Bouyoucos method [18], pH measurement with an inoLab® pH 7310 meter, and electrical conductivity (EC) assessed in the saturation extract using an inoLab® Cond 7310. Total carbon (TC), total organic carbon (TOC), and total nitrogen (TN) were quantified through dry combustion with an elemental analyzer (LECO CN828, LECO Ltd., Germany). Extractable phosphorus (Pₐ) was analyzed using the Olsen method [19]. Additionally, extractable potassium (Kₐ) and exchangeable cations (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, K⁺, Na⁺) were measured using ammonium saturation, while total metal content and heavy metals were determined via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with a Perkin Elmer NexION 2000 Series P instrument (Perkin Elmer Inc., USA).
The microbiological analysis counted mesophilic aerobes (CFU g-1), molds and yeasts (CFU g-1), actinomycetes (CFU g-1), and Bacillus spp. (CFU g-1), and enumerated Pseudomonas spp. (MPN g-1) [20,21].

2.6. Agronomic Parameters

The biometric variables—plant height (cm) and stem diameter (mm)—were measured at the end of the maize vegetative growth stage, approximately 80 days after sowing. We measured plant height from the plant collar to the last visible node on the stem. A caliper was used to measure stem diameter at the center of the first internode emerging from the soil; an average was taken between the largest and smallest diameters. The total number of leaves per plant was also recorded around 80 days after sowing. Leaf area was calculated using the Montgomery formula, multiplying the length and width of each leaf by a correction factor of 0.75 and then summing the total leaf area per plant [22]. At the end of the experimental period, the aerial parts of the plants were collected and weighed to determine fresh weight. To determine dry weight, the samples were then placed in labeled envelopes and dried in an oven at 70°C for ~ 72 hours until a constant weight was obtained [23].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was conducted using the R statistical computing environment version 4.3.1 (R Core Team, 2023). The data was analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality [24] and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variances [25] at the significance level of p < 0.05. Subsequently, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and for mean comparisons, Tukey’s test was applied at the significance level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Soil Parameters

Significant differences were observed in the mean values of soil chemical variables such as electrical conductivity (EC) and total organic carbon (TOC). The results indicate that the electrical conductivity did not vary significantly with the treatments. Also, the TOC was higher in the treatment with only biochar, as shown in Table 3.
We analyzed some general groups of microorganisms and indicator genera, Table 4 shows the microbial communities identified in the soil according to the tested treatments.

3.2. Agronomic Parameters

The data on aerial fresh weight, number of leaves, stem diameter, and leaf area across the different treatments are presented in Table 5, where significant differences can be observed. In this study, stem diameter and leaf area were reduced in the treatment with only leachate.
The agronomic quality and productivity were evaluated. Table 6 shows the corncob variables and Popcorn yield.
Vermicompost leachate (T1) had a detrimental effect on the parameters of leaf area, one hundred seeds weight, seeds number per plant, cob length, cob weight, grain weight per corncob, corncob length, kernel row number, kernels per row, and corncob diameter. Instead, Biochar (T2) had major soil organic carbon, longer seeds with a major diameter, a higher number of mesophilic aerobes, molds, and yeasts.
A Pearson correlation was realized with a significance level of p < 0.05 (Figure 2).
According to Figure 2, sites with more exchangeable K also tend to have lower exchangeable Ca (r: -0.79), nitrogen in leaves (r: -0.5), corncob weight (r: -0.55), corncob length (r: -0.58), cob weight (r: -0.53), cob length (r: - 0.51), plant fresh weight (r: -0.53), and plant diameter (r: -0.51).
A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is shown in Figure 3, and the differences between treatments were notable. Dimensions 1 (28.2%) and 2 (15.3%) are the first two principal components; together, they explain 43.5% of the total variation in the data.
The control treatment (T0) stands out in terms of plant growth and yield attributes. However, among the organic amendments, Vermicompost leachate (T1) was related to soil nutrients such as potassium and Pseudomonas spp.; Biochar (T2) highlighted for its soil characteristics, microbial communities, and plant biomass, and the Vermicompost leachate plus Biochar (T3) had an intermediate behaviour

4. Discussion

Previous studies have shown that the foliar application of vermicompost leachate can enhance growth and physiological responses in crops under saline conditions. For instance, it promoted the development of pomegranate seedlings by improving tolerance to salinity stress [26]. Similarly, other research demonstrated that a low dose of solid vermicompost applied before planting improved strawberry yield in the first year; however, in the absence of further fertilization, yields declined to control levels in subsequent years. Although vermicompost leachate did not improve yield, it was associated with better fruit quality [27]. In our study, a slight reduction in electrical conductivity (EC) was observed in the leachate treatments, although this difference was not statistically significant, suggesting limited efficacy under the experimental conditions.
The chemical characterization of the leachate has an approximate organic matter content of 60%, total humic substances representing 80% of the organic matter, total nitrogen at 2%, and total organic nitrogen at 1.5%. Also, the leachate has an interesting microbial community, among them, amylolytic, cellulolytic, nitrosant, nitricant, sulfate reducers, sulfur oxidants, aerobic nitrogen-fixing, anaerobic nitrogen-fixing, denitrifying, ammonifying, actinomycetes, aerobic, and anaerobic bacteria [28]. Additionally, a pH of 8.40 and EC of 3.34 dS m-1 enabled the microbial growth, above all bacteria, for example, Pseudomonas spp., as they could be seen at PCA for T1. Some authors mentioned that the microbial biomass nitrogen and dehydrogenase enzyme activity were higher after the addition of vermicompost [29]. All of this leads to the conclusion that the high concentration of applied bacteria but the low content of organic matter in the soil caused a lot of pressure in the microbial ecosystem, and it is presumed that immobilization took place by them.
In addition, vermicompost leachate may contain microbial populations indicative of an incomplete stabilization process, potentially posing phytotoxic or phytopathogenic risks. A study of High-throughput 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing of fresh leachate samples revealed a dominance of Mollicutes, particularly Acholeplasma, a genus associated with plant pathogenicity. Over time, storage decline Mollicutes and a concurrent enrichment of taxa of plant-beneficial traits, including members of the Rhizobiales and the genus Pseudomonas. These results underscore the importance of a maturation or storage phase to mitigate potential phytopathogenic risks and enhance the presence of beneficial microbial consortia [30]; also, the leachate should be characterized in terms of its phytotoxic and phytopathogenic composition to prevent adverse effects.
Likewise, biochar in soils with low organic matter content and high aeration, as is often the case in arid environments, can sometimes limit its benefits. In these systems, limited water availability may suppress the positive effects commonly attributed to biochar, particularly its capacity to enhance nutrient uptake by crops [12]. Nonetheless, in our experiment, biochar application was associated with improvements in microbial activity and plant growth, despite saline conditions. Also, the soil organic carbon was higher after its application, which gives us the perspective of residual effect and potential for carbon sequestration. Long-term studies are needed to see the residual effect of carbon input to the soil, mesophilic aerobes bacteria, molds, and yeasts.
The observed increase in bacterial abundance under biochar treatment aligns with previous reports indicating that bacteria respond rapidly to environments enriched with labile carbon sources. Furthermore, the microbial response can differ by group; for example, Gram-positive bacteria often rely more heavily on carbon derived from soil organic matter (SOM), while Gram-negative bacteria tend to utilize carbon derived from plant biomass [31,32]. Therefore, understanding how biochar influences microbial community structure and metabolism is essential, particularly in degraded or stressed soils. It is well established that organic and biochar-based amendments can significantly reshape the composition and functionality of soil microbial communities, with downstream effects on soil health, nutrient cycling, and crop performance [33]. In general, biochar is considered non-toxic to soil biota and can promote both plant biomass accumulation and microbial abundance. However, these effects are highly context-dependent, influenced by factors such as biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, application rate, and the baseline properties of the receiving soil [34]. Interestingly, studies have noted that biochar produced at lower pyrolysis temperatures (<400 °C) may exhibit higher toxicity potential and a greater likelihood of triggering aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated responses in soil organisms, highlighting the importance of carefully selecting and characterizing biochar before use in agricultural systems [35].
Nevertheless, a Top-Lit UpDraft (TLUD) gasifier, known as the reverse downdraft gasifier, is a type of biomass stove designed for clean, smokeless flame and efficient combustion of solid biomass fuels. It could be used for small-scale energy generation, especially in off-grid or rural areas [36]. This is important because it is a simple and low-cost biochar production technology suitable for remote areas, which can enhance agricultural production
On the other hand, there are antecedents about the application of activated biochar by vermicompost leachate, which have allowed the colonization and multiplication of bacteria contained in the liquid over biochar particles. It’s important to note that the effects of applying activated biochar to soils can differ based on several factors, including the biochar type, soil composition, and the particular microorganisms present [37]. Also, it was reported that high salinity soils could be managed through salt leaching by improving the formation of aggregates, aggregate microstructure, and inhibition of nitrogen losses with vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer [38]; however, it was not evident under the study conditions. Therefore, the combined application would not be the most advisable.

5. Conclusions

While a substantial portion of the soil’s physicochemical, microbiological, and agronomic parameters did not show statistically significant differences compared to the control, biochar application alone led to improvements in key indicators, including total organic carbon and microbial community (mesophilic aerobes, molds, and yeasts). These results confirm the potential of biochar as an effective amendment for enhancing soil quality and supporting plant development in saline environments, not only as a soil conditioner but also as a tool for resilience-building in degraded agroecosystems. Instead, vermicompost leachate may not be suitable as a standalone or complementary amendment under salinity stress, and its presumed agronomic benefits may be overestimated in such contexts.
From an agronomic perspective, the findings are especially relevant for the sustainable cultivation of popcorn maize, a short-cycle and high-demand crop that is gaining commercial interest in Peru. Future research should focus on the long-term environmental fate of these amendments, particularly their mobility in soil, potential for nutrient leaching, previous analysis of phytopathogens, and risks of surface and groundwater contamination. Additionally, further studies are needed to evaluate synergistic strategies, such as combining biochar with beneficial microbial inoculants, to enhance soil functionality and crop productivity under stress-prone conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S. and L.O.; methodology, R.S. and L.O.; software, W.E.P.; validation, W.E.P. and R.S.; formal analysis, W.E.P. and Y.A.; investigation, B.R.; resources, R.S.; data curation, W.E.P. and Y.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.R. and W.E.P.; writing—review and editing, W.E.P. and R.S.; visualization, W.E.P.; supervision, R.S.; project administration, R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the INIA project “Mejoramiento de los servicios de investigación y transferencia tecnológica en el manejo y recuperación de suelos agrícolas degradados y aguas para riego en la pequeña y mediana agricultura en los departamentos de Lima, Áncash, San Martín, Cajamarca, Lambayeque, Junín, Ayacucho, Arequipa, Puno y Ucayali”with grant number CUI N◦ 2487112.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Héctor Cantaro.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Basak, N.; Rai, A.K.; Barman, A.; Mandal, S.; Sundha, P.; Bedwal, S.; Kumar, S.; Yadav, R.K.; Sharma, P.C. Salt Affected Soils: Global Perspectives. In Soil Health and Environmental Sustainability: Application of Geospatial Technology; Shit, P.K., Adhikary, P.P., Bhunia, G.S., Sengupta, D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2022; ISBN 978-3-031-09270-1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lin, H.-I.; Yu, Y.-Y.; Wen, F.-I.; Liu, P.-T. Status of Food Security in East and Southeast Asia and Challenges of Climate Change. Climate 2022, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baum, Z.; Palatnik, R.R.; Kan, I.; Rapaport-Rom, M. Economic Impacts of Water Scarcity Under Diverse Water Salinities. Water Econs. Policy 2016, 02, 1550013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lavado Status and Sustainable Management of Salt Affected Soils in Latin America. 2021.
  5. Akhtar, S.S.; Andersen, M.N.; Liu, F. Residual Effects of Biochar on Improving Growth, Physiology and Yield of Wheat under Salt Stress. Agricultural Water Management 2015, 158, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rupay, J.; Pérez, W.E.; Solórzano-Acosta, R.; Quintanilla, J.; Cruz, J.; Cosme, R.; Rupay, J.; Pérez, W.E.; Solórzano-Acosta, R.; Quintanilla, J.; et al. Variación de La Emisión de Co2 Temporal, Co2 Acumulado y Mejora de Características Asociadas a La Fertilidad de Un Suelo Ácido Mediante La Aplicación de Biochar. Folia Amazónica 2023, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Petmuenwai, N.; Srihaban, P.; Kume, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Iwai, C.B. Remediating Severely Salt-Affected Soil with Vermicompost and Organic Amendments for Cultivating Salt-Tolerant Crops as a Functional Food Source. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hafez, E.M.; Omara, A.E.D.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; El-Esawi, M.A. Minimizing Hazard Impacts of Soil Salinity and Water Stress on Wheat Plants by Soil Application of Vermicompost and Biochar. Physiologia Plantarum 2021, 172, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oyege, I.; Balaji Bhaskar, M.S. Effects of Vermicompost on Soil and Plant Health and Promoting Sustainable Agriculture. Soil Systems 2023, 7, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nayak, H.; Rai, S.; Mahto, R.; Rani, P.; Yadav, S.; Kumar Prasad, S.; Kumar Singh, R. Vermiwash: A Potential Tool for Sustainable Agriculture.; Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, May 27 2019; Vol. Special Issue-5, pp. 308–312.
  11. Kamali, M.; Sweygers, N.; Al-Salem, S.; Appels, L.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Dewil, R. Biochar for Soil Applications-Sustainability Aspects, Challenges and Future Prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 428, 131189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kocsis, T.; Ringer, M.; Biró, B. Characteristics and Applications of Biochar in Soil–Plant Systems: A Short Review of Benefits and Potential Drawbacks. Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Enebe, M.C.; Erasmus, M. Vermicomposting Technology - A Perspective on Vermicompost Production Technologies, Limitations and Prospects. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 345, 118585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. MIDAGRI Maíz Available online:. Available online: https://www.midagri.gob.pe/portal/30-sector-agrario/maiz/250-maiz?start=2 (accessed on 9 April 2025).
  15. Huanuqueño, E. Desarrollo de Híbridos Simples de Maíz Popcorn Morado Mediante Métodos Convencionales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, 2023.
  16. Sadzawka, R.A.; Carrasco, R.M.; Grez, Z.R.; Mora, G.M. Métodos de Análisis de Compost 2005.
  17. Uzoma, K.C.; Inoue, M.; Andry, H.; Fujimaki, H.; Zahoor, A.; Nishihara, E. Effect of Cow Manure Biochar on Maize Productivity under Sandy Soil Condition. Soil Use and Management 2011, 27, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beretta, A.N.; Silbermann, A.V.; Paladino, L.; Torres, D.; Kassahun, D.; Musselli, R.; García Lamohte, A. Soil Texture Analyses Using a Hydrometer: Modification of the Bouyoucos Method. Ciencia e investigación agraria: revista latinoamericana de ciencias de la agricultura 2014, 41, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guadarrama-Pérez, V.H.; Robledo-Pérez, R.M.; Treviño-Quintanilla, L.G.; Carrillo-Morales, M.; Guadarrama-Pérez, O.; Hernández-Romano, J. Soil Properties That Affect the Adsorption of ΦITL-1 and ΦRSP Bacteriophages. J Soils Sediments 2024, 24, 2974–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ortiz-Ojeda, P.; Ogata-Gutiérrez, K.; Zúñiga-Dávila, D. Evaluation of Plant Growth Promoting Activity and Heavy Metal Tolerance of Psychrotrophic Bacteria Associated with Maca (Lepidium Meyenii Walp.) Rhizosphere. AIMS Microbiol 2017, 3, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Calvo, P.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Zúñiga, D. Characterization of Bacillus Isolates of Potato Rhizosphere from Andean Soils of Peru and Their Potential PGPR Characteristics. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yu, X.; Shi, P.; Schrader, J.; Niklas, K.J. Nondestructive Estimation of Leaf Area for 15 Species of Vines with Different Leaf Shapes. American Journal of Botany 2020, 107, 1481–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vivanco, T.D.S.; Pérez, W.E.; Lastra-Paúcar, S.; Verme-Mustiga, E.; Solórzano-Acosta, R. THE FERMENTED LIQUID BIOFERTILIZER USE DERIVED FROM SLAUGHTERHOUSE WASTE IMPROVES MAIZE CROP YIELD. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2024, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. SHAPIRO, S.S.; WILK, M.B. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples)†. Biometrika 1965, 52, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, J.; and Wong, A.C.M. A Note on Determining the p -Value of Bartlett’s Test of Homogeneity of Variances. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 2003, 32, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bidabadi, S.S.; Dehghanipoodeh, S.; Wright, G.C. Vermicompost Leachate Reduces Some Negative Effects of Salt Stress in Pomegranate. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 2017, 6, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Čabilovski, R.; Manojlović, M.S.; Popović, B.M.; Radojčin, M.T.; Magazin, N.; Petković, K.; Kovačević, D.; Lakićević, M.D. Vermicompost and Vermicompost Leachate Application in Strawberry Production: Impact on Yield and Fruit Quality. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Becagli, M.; Guglielminetti,Lorenzo; and Cardelli, R. Effects of Combined Biochar and Vermicompost Solution on Leachate Characterization and Nitrogen Balance from a Greenhouse Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) Cultivation Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2021, 52, 1879–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arancon, N.Q.; Edwards, C.A.; Bierman, P. Influences of Vermicomposts on Field Strawberries: Part 2. Effects on Soil Microbiological and Chemical Properties. Bioresource Technology 2006, 97, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Romero-Tepal, E.M.; Contreras-Blancas, E.; Navarro-Noya, Y.E.; Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V.M.; Luna-Guido, M.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A.; Dendooven, L. Changes in the Bacterial Community Structure in Stored Wormbed Leachate. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 2014, 24, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yang, J.; Lei, J.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.; Gao, J.; Deng, L.; Yang, M. Biochar Application Induces Different Responses of Bacterial and Fungal Communities to Metabolic Limitation. Land Degradation & Development 2024, 35, 1888–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kramer, C.; Gleixner, G. Soil Organic Matter in Soil Depth Profiles: Distinct Carbon Preferences of Microbial Groups during Carbon Transformation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2008, 40, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dangi, S.; Gao, S.; Duan, Y.; Wang, D. Soil Microbial Community Structure Affected by Biochar and Fertilizer Sources. Applied Soil Ecology 2020, 150, 103452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Godlewska, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Oleszczuk, P. THE DARK SIDE OF BLACK GOLD: Ecotoxicological Aspects of Biochar and Biochar-Amended Soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 403, 123833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lyu, H.; He, Y.; Tang, J.; Hecker, M.; Liu, Q.; Jones, P.D.; Codling, G.; Giesy, J.P. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on Potential Toxicity of Biochar If Applied to the Environment. Environmental Pollution 2016, 218, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rabby, M.I.I.; Uddin, M.W.; Sheikh, M.R.; Bhuiyan, H.K.; Mumu, T.A.; Islam, F.; Sultana, A. Thermal Performance of Gasifier Cooking Stoves: A Systematic Literature Review. F1000Res 2023, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carril, P.; Becagli, M.; Celletti, S.; Fedeli, R.; Loppi, S.; Cardelli, R. Biofertilization with Liquid Vermicompost-Activated Biochar Enhances Microbial Activity and Soil Properties. Soil Systems 2024, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Y. Saline-Alkali Soil Applied with Vermicompost and Humic Acid Fertilizer Improved Macroaggregate Microstructure to Enhance Salt Leaching and Inhibit Nitrogen Losses. Applied Soil Ecology 2020, 156, 103705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Greenhouse values of temperature and relative humidity.
Figure 1. Greenhouse values of temperature and relative humidity.
Preprints 158853 g001
Figure 2. Pearson correlation between soil and agronomic parameters. Plant Height (PH), Plant Diameter (PD), Plant Fresh Weight (PFW), Number of Leaves per Plant (NLPP), Total Leaf Area (TLA), 100-Seed Weight (100 SW), Number of Seeds per Plant (NSPP), Seed Length (SL), Seed Diameter (SD), Cob Length (CCL), Cob Weight (CCW), Corncob Weight (CW), Corncob Length (CL), Corncob Diameter (CD), Leaf Carbon (C_leaf), Leaf Nitrogen (N_leaf), Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria (MAB), Filamentous Fungi and Yeast (FF.Y), Pseudomonas (PSE), Actinomycetes (ACT), Bacillus (BAC), Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Exchangeable Cations (Ca_Ex, Na_Ex, Mg_Ex, K_Ex), Electrical Conductivity (EC).
Figure 2. Pearson correlation between soil and agronomic parameters. Plant Height (PH), Plant Diameter (PD), Plant Fresh Weight (PFW), Number of Leaves per Plant (NLPP), Total Leaf Area (TLA), 100-Seed Weight (100 SW), Number of Seeds per Plant (NSPP), Seed Length (SL), Seed Diameter (SD), Cob Length (CCL), Cob Weight (CCW), Corncob Weight (CW), Corncob Length (CL), Corncob Diameter (CD), Leaf Carbon (C_leaf), Leaf Nitrogen (N_leaf), Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria (MAB), Filamentous Fungi and Yeast (FF.Y), Pseudomonas (PSE), Actinomycetes (ACT), Bacillus (BAC), Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Exchangeable Cations (Ca_Ex, Na_Ex, Mg_Ex, K_Ex), Electrical Conductivity (EC).
Preprints 158853 g002
Figure 3. Biplot of Principal Component Analysis (PCA): (a) Individuals and variables for each treatment; (b) Variables contributions. Plant Height (PH), Plant Diameter (PD), Plant Fresh Weight (PFW), Number of Leaves per Plant (NLPP), Total Leaf Area (TLA), 100-Seed Weight (100 SW), Number of Seeds per Plant (NSPP), Seed Length (SL), Seed Diameter (SD), Cob Length (CCL), Cob Weight (CCW), Corncob Weight (CW), Corncob Length (CL), Corncob Diameter (CD), Leaf Carbon (C_leaf), Leaf Nitrogen (N_leaf), Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria (MAB), Filamentous Fungi and Yeast (FF.Y), Pseudomonas (PSE), Actinomycetes (ACT), Bacillus (BAC), Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Exchangeable Cations (Ca_Ex, Na_Ex, Mg_Ex, K_Ex), Electrical Conductivity (EC).
Figure 3. Biplot of Principal Component Analysis (PCA): (a) Individuals and variables for each treatment; (b) Variables contributions. Plant Height (PH), Plant Diameter (PD), Plant Fresh Weight (PFW), Number of Leaves per Plant (NLPP), Total Leaf Area (TLA), 100-Seed Weight (100 SW), Number of Seeds per Plant (NSPP), Seed Length (SL), Seed Diameter (SD), Cob Length (CCL), Cob Weight (CCW), Corncob Weight (CW), Corncob Length (CL), Corncob Diameter (CD), Leaf Carbon (C_leaf), Leaf Nitrogen (N_leaf), Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria (MAB), Filamentous Fungi and Yeast (FF.Y), Pseudomonas (PSE), Actinomycetes (ACT), Bacillus (BAC), Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Exchangeable Cations (Ca_Ex, Na_Ex, Mg_Ex, K_Ex), Electrical Conductivity (EC).
Preprints 158853 g003
Table 1. Physico-chemical characterization of soil.
Table 1. Physico-chemical characterization of soil.
Characteristics Unit Value Method
Sand % 69.3 Sedimentation
Silt % 16.3 Sedimentation
Clay % 14.4 Sedimentation
Textural Class Sandy loam Hydrometer Method
pH (1:1) --- 7.7 Potentiometer Method (inoLab® pH 7310)
EC (e) dS m-1 14.2 Potentiometer Method (inoLab® Cond 7310)
CaCO3 % 2.8 Titration Method
OM % 0.38 Dry Combustion (LECO CN828, LECO Ltd., Germany)
TC % 0.83 Dry Combustion
TOC % 0.22 Dry Combustion
Pa mg kg-1 71.7 Modified Olsen Method
Ka mg kg-1 594 Ammonium Acetate Extract
CEC Cmol kg-1 23.3 Ammonium Acetate Extract
Ca2+ Cmol kg-1 16.8 Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP - MS) (Perkin Elmer NexION 2000 Series P, Perkin Elmer Inc., USA)
Mg2+ Cmol kg-1 2.8 ICP - MS
K+ Cmol kg-1 1.5 ICP - MS
Na+ Cmol kg-1 2.2 ICP - MS
As mg kg-1 22.34 ICP - MS
Ba mg kg-1 62.76 ICP - MS
Cd mg kg-1 0.14 ICP - MS
Cr mg kg-1 5.4 ICP - MS
Hg mg kg-1 0.24 ICP - MS
Pb mg kg-1 10.58 ICP - MS
Information Source: “Laboratorio de Suelos, Agua y Foliares” (INIA). EC: Electrical Conductivity from a saturated soil paste extract, OM: Organic Matter, TC: Total Carbon, TOC: Total Organic Carbon, Pa: Available phosphorus, Ka: Available potassium, CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity.
Table 2. Applied treatments and substrate proportions.
Table 2. Applied treatments and substrate proportions.
Treatments Proportion in volume
Soil Biochar Vermicompost leachate
T0 4.0 0 0
T1 3.2 0 0.8
T2 3.2 0.8 0
T3 3.2 0.4 0.4
Table 3. Values ​​of soil chemical parameters.
Table 3. Values ​​of soil chemical parameters.
Treatment ECe TN TOC Ca K Na
dS m-1 % Cmol kg-1
Control 4.33ab 0,00112a 0.734bc 8.597a 0.539b 0.574ab
Leachate 3.43b 0.0009a 0.684c 7.428bc 1.044a 0.42b
Biochar 5.55a 0,00101a 1.16a 8.1ab 0.688b 0.812a
Leachate+Biochar 3.37b 0,00093a 1.037ab 7.272c 0.996a 0.382b
p-value 0.0136 0.3451 <0.0004 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0002
Significance * ns *** **** **** ***
Note: ECe: Electrical Conductivity in saturation extract, TN: Total Nitrogen, TOC: Total Organic Carbon. Very highly significant (****), Highly significant (***), Significant (*), Not significant (ns).
Table 4. Quantification and Enumeration of Microbial Composition.
Table 4. Quantification and Enumeration of Microbial Composition.
Treatment Mesophilic aerobes Bacillus spp. Actinomycetes Molds and yeasts Pseudomonas spp.
CFU g-1 MPN g-1
Control 2.63x106b 1.19x106 1.91x106 1.61x104c 274.4a
Leachate 3.22x106b 1.26x106 1.86x106 2.7x104bc 89.1a
Biochar 4.47x106a 1.67x106 2.40x106 4.65x104a 173.8a
Leachate+Biochar 3.49x106ab 1.33x106 1.37x106 3.65x104ab 137.3a
p-value 0.0021 0.1585 0.2029 0.0012 <0.4741
Significance ** ns ns ** ns
Note: Very highly significant (****), Highly significant (***), Significant (*), Not significant (ns).
Table 5. Morphological variables of popcorn maize plants.
Table 5. Morphological variables of popcorn maize plants.
Treatment Fresh Weight Dry Weight Number of leaves Stem Diameter Leaf Area Height
g cm cm2 cm
Control 74.48ab 0.05052a 6.7a 10.97ab 1199a 145.7a
Leachate 62.74b 0.05055a 6.4 ab 9.61c 929b 137.5a
Biochar 79.17a 0.05063a 6.1b 11.83a 972.8ab 143.9a
Leachate+Biochar 68.27ab 0.05057a 5.9b 10.4bc 847.6b 145.7a
p-value 0.0153 0.9268 0.0006 <0.0001 0.0009 0.3114
Significance * ns *** **** *** ns
Note: Very highly significant (****), Highly significant (***), Significant (*), Not significant (ns).
Table 6. Corncob variables and Popcorn yield.
Table 6. Corncob variables and Popcorn yield.
Treatment Grain weight per corncob Corncob Length Corncob Diameter Popcorn Yield
g cm g planta-1
Control 20.9a 8.424a 2.773a 24.01a
Leachate 10.68b 5.739c 2.367b 13.06c
Biochar 15.12b 7.681ab 2.721a 19.02ab
Leachate+Biochar 14.14b 6.879bc 2.655a 16.65bc
p-value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0003 <0.0001
Significance **** **** *** ****
Note: Very highly significant (****), Highly significant (***), Significant (*), Not significant (ns).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated