Submitted:
04 May 2025
Posted:
07 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Model and Hypothesis
2.1. Personal Acceptance
2.2. Response to the Brand
2.3. Decision Concept

3. Research Methodology
| Hypothesis | เส้นทาง | β | P-value | Result | ||
| H1 | Acceptance (AC) | → | Perception of Brand (PE) | 0.699 | < 0.001 | Accepted |
| H2 | Response to the brand (RE) | → | Perception of Brand (PE) | 0.228 | 0.319 | Rejected |
| H3 | Decision (DE) | → | Perception of Brand (PE) | 0.170 | < 0.001 | Accepted |
| H4 | Acceptance (AC) | → | Response to the brand (RE) | 0.962 | < 0.001 | Accepted |
| H5 | Response to the brand (RE) | → | Decision (DE) | 0.547 | 0.019 | Accepted |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
6. Recommendation
References
- Aaker, D.A. Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name; Free Press, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Amornsriwong, P.; Sawanyavisuth, B. The study of attitudes and behaviors in media consumption of Y girls. Rangsit Graduate Research Journal in Business and Social Sciences 2019, 5, 34–48. [Google Scholar]
- Baijal, A.; Cannarsi, A.; Hoppe, F.; Chang, W.; Davis, S.; Sipahimalani, R. economy SEA 2021: The digital decade: Southeast Asia's internet economy resurgence is fueling growth across the region. Bain & Company. 2021. Available online: https://www.bain.com/insights/e-conomy-sea-2021/.
- Bentler, P.M.; Bonett, D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 88, 588–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Ilic, A.; Juric, B.; Hollebeek, L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research 2011, 66, 105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. 2016.
- Carroll, B.; Ahuvia, A.C. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters 2006, 17, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhuri, A.; Holbrook, M.B. The chain of effects from brand trust and Brand affect on brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing 2001, 65, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Ma, S.; Wang, S. Idol worship: How does it influence fan consumers’ brand loyalty? Frontiers in Psychology 2022, 13, 850670. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Qin, Z.; Yan, Y.; Huang, Y. The power of influencers: How does influencer marketing shape consumers’ purchase intentions? Sustainability 2024, 16, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, W.; Lin, H.; Sun, P.C. Repurchase intention based on brand awareness, brand image, and perceived quality: An empirical study of online group buying in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review 2016, 21, 242–251. [Google Scholar]
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. 1977.
- Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). etda-ecs-64-01: E-commerce value in Thailand 2021. 2023. https://www.etda.or.th/th/Our-Service/Standard-(1)/Law.
- George, D.; Mallery, P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (18th ed.). Routledge. 2016.
- Greve, G. The moderating effect of customer engagement on the brand image – brand loyalty relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014, 148, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education. 2010.
- Hermanus, A.E.; Margaretha, S.; Indarini., *!!! REPLACE !!!*. The impact of social media marketing on brand loyalty: The mediation effect of brand-value consciousness towards Adidas brand in Indonesia. Journal of Management and Business 2016, 15, 24–25. [Google Scholar]
- Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M.R. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2008, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, K.L. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th ed.). Pearson Education. 2013.
- Keller, K.L. Consumer research insights on brands and branding: A JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research 2020, 46, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. 2015.
- Komsan Tortermvasana, Suchit Leesa-nguansuk, & Dusida Worrachaddejchai. Asia falls in love with Thai Boys Love. Bangkok Post. 2022. Available online: https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2305042/asia-falls-in-love-with-thai-boys-love.
- Leary, M.R. Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior (2nd ed.). Routledge. 2015.
- Liu, J. The impact of parasocial relationships on consumer behavior in the context of Boys' Love media in Thailand [Published master's thesis]. Chulalongkorn University. 2022.
- Luszczynska, A.; Gutiérrez-Doña, B.; Schwarzer, R. General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology 2005, 40, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulincer, M.; Shaver, P.R. An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2012, 11, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadanyiova, M.; Gajanova, L.; Majerova, J.; Lizbetinova, L. Influencer marketing and its impact on consumer lifestyles. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 2020, 8, 109–120. [Google Scholar]
- Nair, S. A guide to the Boys’ Love (BL) genre: How Thailand became the reigning king of Yaoi. AsiaOne. 2023. Available online: https://www.asiaone.com/entertainment/guide-boys-love-bl-genre-how-thailand-became-reigning-king-yaoi.
- Neff, K.D. Self-compassion, self-esteem, and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2011, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.; Leblanc, G. Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers' retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2014, 21, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. 1978.
- Owens, B.P.; Wallace, A.S.; Beu, D.S. Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology 2015, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parinyaporn, P. Riding the BL wave: Why is Thailand the capital of Boys' Love content? Thai Enquirer. 2023. Available online: https://time.com/6208817/thailand-bl-dramas-popularity/.
- Priyankara, R.; Weerasiri, S.; Dissanayaka, R.; Jinadasa, M. Celebrity endorsement and consumer buying intention with relation to the television advertisement for perfumes. Management Studies 2017, 5, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, R.; Langner, T.; Temme, D. Brand love: Conceptual and empirical investigation of a holistic causal model. Journal of Brand Management 2021, 28, 609–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rattanapong, S. The influence of perceived realism on parasocial relationships and purchase intention of Boys' Love media fans in Thailand [Published master's thesis]. Thammasat University. 2021.
- Sarkar, A. Romancing with a brand: A conceptual analysis of romantic consumer-brand relationship. Management & Marketing 2011, 6, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
- Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge. 2010.
- Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge. 2016.
- Sharma, S.; Singh, G.; Pratt, S. Does Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Travel Online Differ Across Generations? : Empirical Evidence from Australia. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 2020, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimp, T.A.; Madden, T.J. Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg's triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research 1988, pp. 15, 163–168. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Retail e-commerce sales worldwide from 2014 to 2027. Statista. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/.
- Sternberg, R.J. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review 1986, 93, 119–135. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. 2004.
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Bitner, M.J.; Gremler, D.D. Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm. McGraw-Hill Education. 2020.
- Zhang, S.; Peng, M.Y.-P.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, G.; Chen, C.-C. Expressive brand relationship, brand love, and brand loyalty for tablet PCs: Building a sustainable brand. Frontiers in Psychology 2020, 11, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Factor | S.D. | Skewness | Kurtosis | average | Interpretation |
| Acceptance of imaginary romantic partner (AC) | |||||
| personal trust (AC1) | 1.04 | -0.863 | 0.511 | 3.85 | Important |
| success (AC2) | 0.971 | -1.070 | 0.994 | 4.07 | Important |
| Influence in society (AC3) | 1.07 | -0.940 | 0.518 | 3.83 | Important |
| Communication and public relations abilities (AC4) | 0.974 | -0.875 | 0.573 | 3.99 | Important |
| Personal charm or uniqueness (AC5) | 0.898 | -0.886 | 0.698 | 4.23 | Very Important |
| Response to the brand (RE) | |||||
| Brand awareness (RE1) | 0.903 | -1.02 | 0.813 | 4.27 | Important |
| Brand engagement (RE2) | 0.922 | -0.910 | 0.843 | 4.04 | Important |
| An in-depth exploration of the brand. (RE3) | 0.956 | -0.981 | 0.922 | 3.99 | Important |
| Brand communication and public relations capabilities (RE4) | 0.909 | -0.919 | 0.600 | 4.11 | Very Important |
| Brand reliability (RE5) | 0.884 | -0.918 | 0.928 | 4.09 | Important |
| Decision (DE) | |||||
| Awareness (DE1) | 1.140 | -0.443 | -0.559 | 3.13 | Moderately Important |
| Seeking information (DE2) | 1.220 | -0.415 | -0.789 | 3.46 | Important |
| Evaluation of alternatives (DE3) | 1.100 | -0.494 | -0.457 | 3.59 | Important |
| Purchasing decision (DE4) | 1.030 | -0.692 | 0.234 | 3.74 | Important |
| Feelings after the purchase (DE5) | 0.922 | -0.521 | 0.297 | 3.75 | Important |
| Factor | S.D. | Skewness | Kurtosis | average | Interpretation |
| Perception of Brand Value (PE) | |||||
| Brand identity perception (PE1) | 0.880 | -1.07 | 1.60 | 4.06 | Important |
| Brand quality perception (PE2) | 0.993 | -0.918 | 0.714 | 3.91 | Important |
| Relationships with customers (PE3) | 1.200 | -0.852 | -0.044 | 3.16 | Moderately Important |
| Perception of brand image/ideology. (PE4) | 0.915 | -0.867 | 0.590 | 4.06 | Important |
| Brand loyalty (PE5) | 1.040 | -0.787 | 0.285 | 3.82 | Important |
| Statistical Measure Used for Evaluation | Standard Criteria | Test Results | Reference for Standard Criteria |
| < 3 | 2.510 | Thompson (2004) | |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: RMSEA | < 0.07 | 0.022 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) | > 0.90 | 0.958 | |
| Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | > 0.94 | 0.991 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Comparative Fit Index : CFI | > 0.94 | 0.990 | Byrne (2005) |
| RMR (Root Mean Square Residual) | < 0.05 | 0.014 | |
| Standardized root mean square residual: SRMR | < 0.08 | 0.057 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index: NFI | > 0.95 | 0.933 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Statistical Measure Used for Evaluation | Standard Criteria | Test Results | Reference for Standard Criteria |
| Chi-Square/df | < 3 | 2.510 | Thompson (2004) |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: RMSEA | < 0.07 | 0.056 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) | > 0.90 | 0.958 | Schumacker & Lomax (2016) |
| Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) | > 0.94 | 0.991 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Comparative Fit Index : CFI | > 0.94 | 0.992 | Byrne (2005) |
| RMR (Root Mean Square Residual) | < 0.05 | 0.014 | Hooper et al. (2008) |
| Standardized root mean square residual: SRMR | < 0.08 | 0.057 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index: NFI | > 0.95 | 0.991 | Hair et al. (2010) |
| Bentler-Bonett Non-normed Fit Index: NNFI | >0.95 | 0.986 | Byrne (2005) |
| Factor | Factor Loadings | Prediction Coefficient (r2) | P-Value |
| Acceptance of imaginary romantic partner (AC) | |||
| personal trust (AC1) | 0.691 | 0.477 | < 0.001 |
| Communication and public relations abilities (AC4) | 0.408 | 0.166 | < 0.001 |
| Personal charm or uniqueness (AC5) | 0.531 | 0.282 | < 0.001 |
| Response to the brand (RE) | |||
| Brand awareness (RE1) | 0.711 | 0.504 | < 0.001 |
| Brand communication and public relations capabilities (RE4) | 0.589 | 0.346 | < 0.001 |
| Brand reliability (RE5) | 0.546 | 0.298 | < 0.001 |
| Decision (DE) | |||
| Seeking information (DE2) | 0.676 | 0.456 | < 0.001 |
| Evaluation of alternatives (DE3) | 0.77 | 0.592 | < 0.001 |
| Feelings after the purchase (DE5) | 0.621 | 0.385 | < 0.001 |
| Perception of Brand Value (PE) | |||
| Brand identity perception (PE1) | 0.596 | 0.355 | < 0.001 |
| Brand quality perception (PE2) | 0.694 | 0.481 | < 0.001 |
| Relationships with customers (PE3) | 0.638 | 0.407 | < 0.001 |
| Perception of brand image/ideology (PE4) | 0.63 | 0.396 | < 0.001 |
| Brand loyalty (PE5) | 0.544 | 0.295 | < 0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).