Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Assessment of the Oral Health Perceptions and Behaviours of Adolescents Aged 15–18 Years in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Cross Sectional Study

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

24 April 2025

Posted:

25 April 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: The objective of this investigation was to assess the oral health (OH) of Bosnia and Herzegovinian adolescents in relation differences and socioeconomic status (SES). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 306 school children from high schools located in the Tuzla Canton (Bosnia and Herzegovina). The sample consisted of 183 females and 123 males between 15 and 18 years (mean of 16, 82 years). The study was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020, via a Annex 8 questionnaire from the orld Health Organization (WHO), which collected information on OH behaviours, self-perceptions of oral health and dietary factors responsible for the OH of each subject. Cross-tabulations were evaluated according to sex and socioeconomic status (SES) via the chi-square test. Results: Over 40% of the participants consumed sweets, cakes and biscuits on daily basis, whereas 41.5% of the participants visited a dentist only in the case of pain. The consumption of sweets (p = 0.024) and cakes and biscuits (p = 0.011) on a daily basis was significantly greater in female adolescents than in male adolescents. Compared with male adolescents, female adolescents reported occasional toothaches more frequently (p = 0.001) and were more dissatisfied with their dental appearance (p = 0.008) but presented a greater frequency of flossing (p = 0.001) and toothbrushing (3–5 times a day) (p = 0.0001). There was no association between the different levels (below average, average, above average) of SES and factors affecting OH status of adolescents. Conclusions: The study revealed significant sex differences in several factors affecting OH status and revealed no relationship between SES and OH behaviours or between perceptions and risk factors affecting OH in 15–18-year-old adolescents. Data obtained from this study might help in the creation of new OH prevention programs aimed at improving the OH status of adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Good oral health (OH) status represents a major part of overall health and quality of life [1]. The status of OH in one population is related to several factors, such as the frequency of regular visits to dental offices for check-ups, the frequency of toothbrushing, the use of proximal cleaning devices, sugar intake, the consumption of fluoride products and the consumption of fluoridated water [2,3,4,5]. OH status is also influenced by social and economic status, level of education, environmental factors and health care services [6,7]. Currently, the most common oral diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal disease, might be prevented by adequate preventive treatment [8,9].
To prevent the onset of early childhood caries, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) recommends toothbrushing twice daily, providing treatment with a fluoride varnish and avoiding the consumption of sugary foods and drinks beginning in early childhood [10]. A higher risk for caries is directly and positively correlated with irregular and improper oral hygiene maintenance. With the aim of improving overall OH status and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL), the WHO continous to work to further develop, improve and promote OH policy at the global level. Previous studies showed that Bosnia and Herzegovina are European country with very poor OH status and is within the 5 countries with the highest relative risk for caries [11,12]. Bad OH habits and behaviours adopted in childhood and adolescence may adversely affect OH status in adulthood [13]. Adolescence is a transitional period between childhood and adulthood during which children experience many biological, developmental and socioemotional transitions. Children’s perceptions and attitudes and OH behaviours evolve mostly during the middle childhood period. Factors such as geographical region, sex, socioeconomic status (SES) and organization of the health-care system has a significant effect on differences in findings related to OH perceptions and behaviours among adolescents [14,15]. A recent study of four Balkan countries, including Bosnia-Herzegovina, showed that participants did not perceive OH as a part of overall health [16]. Earlier investigations confirmed that differences in OH habits were related to different levels of SES [17,18]. Low SES was associated with a greater likelihood of oral health-risk behaviours in adolescents [19,20]. Evidence shows that oral diseases are mostly present in low-and middle-income countries with a low SES [21]. In Bosnia and Herzegovina prevention programs have been developed for elementary schools but no prevention programs have been developed for high schools. Bosnia and Herzegovina lacks national programs for the prevention of OH problems and protection of OH [11,22]. In general, the OH perceptions and behaviours of adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina are underinvestigated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the OH behaviours, perceptions and dietary habits of 15–18-year-old adolescents in Tuzla Canton (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Another aim was to investigate the associations between OH behaviours, perceptions and risk factors and socioeconomic status. To our knowledge, no similar study including adolescents in the Tuzla Canton has been conducted until now.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This cross-sectional study included 306 school-aged adolescents from high schools located in the Tuzla Canton (Bosnia and Herzegovina). The sample consisted of 183 female subjects and 123 male subjects. The period of adolescence encompassed by this study included adolescents aged between 15 and 18 years (mean age of 16.82 years). A total of 43.1% of the adolescents had a low SES, 45.8% had an average SES, and 11.1% had a high SES (Table 1).
Three schools from several cities were randomly selected to represent the Tuzla Canton as the most populated canton among ten cantons in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The inclusion criteria for the present study were as follows: students who were willing to cooperate, students without psychological disorders, students without progressive oral disease, students with no history of systemic disease and students with no previous orthodontic treatment. The exclusion criteria for the study were any type of orthodontic treatment, cognitive impairment, psychological disorders and drug addiction. From December 2019 and March 2020 OH perceptions, risk factors and behaviours of each subject were evaluated using a questionnaire of the World Health Organization (WHO).

2.2. Ethical Consideration

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Sarajevo. The study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research. Prior to participation, the parents were provided with detailed information about the study in Bosnian. Written consent was obtained from both the students and their parents.

2.3. Questionnaire

For the self-assessment of oral health, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of several questionnaires titled; “Oral health surveys: Basic methods —5th Edition”, which are provided on the WHO website [23]. In this survey, the WHO (Annex 8) questionnaire was used for the collection of data on self-assessed OH and risk factors for children or adolescents. The data obtained using this questionnaire provided information about the dental visits and oral hygiene habits, dietary habits, dental appearance related problems and self-perceived OH of each subject. The interview format of the questionnaire provided additional information about some of the questions, reducing the possibility of erroneous answers. The English version of the WHO questionnaire was translated into Bosnian by oral health specialists who were fluent in English, and the questionnaire was administered to all adolescents who agreed to participate in the study. The survey comprises 28 questions divided into three sections. The first set of questions are related to oral health behaviours, the second part includes questions related to self-perceived OH, and the third part includes questions related to the assessment of dietary risk factors. Examinations were performed by the same experienced investigator trained to record parameters related to OH status.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

In this study, all the statistical procedures were performed with the statistical package IBM Statistics SPSS v 23.0. Cross-tabulations were evaluated according to sex and SES via the chi-square test. To evaluate sample reliability, Cronbach’s alpha reliability test was used.

3. Results

3.1. Oral Health Behaviors

Analysis of the frequency of dental visits revealed that 16.0% of the participants had never visited a dentist in the last 12 months, 18.3% of the participants had visited a dentist once, 24.2% had visited a dentist twice, 15.7% had visited a dentist three times, 18.3% had visited a dentist four times and 7.5% did not know how many times they visited a dentist. There was a significantly greater number of males than females who never visited a dentist in the past 12 months (p = 0.005) and who visited a dentist 4 times in the past 12 months. There was no correlation between the SES of the participants and the frequency of dental visits in the past 12 months. A total of 41.5% of the participants visited a dentist due to pain or trouble with their teeth, gums or mouths, 32.4% of the participants visited a dentist for a routine check-up of their teeth, 10.5% visited a dentist for follow-up treatment and 15.7% did not know the main reason for visiting a dentist. With respect to brushing frequency, 92.8% of the participants brushed their teeth 2–6 times daily, 6.5% brushed their teeth once daily, and 0.3% never brushed their teeth or brushed their teeth 2–6 times weekly. Male adolescents brushed their teeth more frequently (twice daily) with a significant p value of 0.0001. No correlation was detected between SES and OH behaviours and oral hygiene habits. All of the participants (100%) used a toothbrush. The percentage of participants who used dental floss was 52.3% with females having using floss more frequently, with a significant p value of 0.001. Toothpicks were used by 37.6% of the participants with a significantly greater number of females using toothpicks (p = 0.023). Plastic toothpicks were used by 19.3% of the participants and Miswak was used by 5.2% of the participants, with no significant differences between female and male adolescents. Toothpaste was used by 99.3% of the adolescents, and toothpaste with fluoride was used by 12.4% of the participants with no statistically significant difference between the sexes (Table 2). No correlation was found between SES and factors related to OH behaviours (Table 3).

3.2. Perceptions of Oral Health

The participants described the health of their teeth as excellent (12.7%), very good (12.7%), good (48%), poor (4.2%), very poor (1.3%) and not known (4.2%). The participants described the health of their gums as excellent (26.1%), very good (28.1%), good (37.3%), poor (3.3%), very poor (1%) and not known (4.2%). A total of 12.1% of the subjects answered that they avoided smiling because of their teeth, while 84.0 % of them did not avoid smiling, and 3.4% did not know if they avoided smiling. Only 2 (0.7%) participants reported that other children made fun of their teeth, 8 (2.6%) of them answered that they did not know if others made fun of their teeth, whereas 296 (96.7%) denied that others made fun of their teeth. Almost all of the subjects (96.1%) answered that they were not forced to miss classes at school due to toothache or discomfort caused by their teeth. A total of 91.5% of the participants reported that they did not have difficulty biting hard foods, and 94.1% reported no difficulty chewing. For the above mentioned factors, no statistically significant differences were found between the sexes. When considering the participants’ satisfaction with the appearance of their teeth, 37% of the participants reported that they were satisfied with the appearance of their teeth, 52.3% were not satisfied, and 10.3% were not sure and answered that they did not know whether they were satisfied. Female adolescentswere more dissatisfied with the appearance of their teeth with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008). A total of 22.9% of the participants had occasional pain or discomfort, 47.4%—rarely experienced pain or discomfort, 26.5%—never experienced pain or discomfort, and 3.3% did not know if they experienced pain or discomfort. Female adolescents more frequently experienced occasional pain and discomfort in comparison to male adolescents (Table 4). There was no significant correlation between SES and factors related to self-perceived OH (Table 5).

3.3. Dietary Habits

Analysis of dietary habits revealed that 10.8% of the participants consumed sweets several times a day, 43.1% consumed sweets every day, 30.7% consumed sweets several times a week, 6.2% consumed sweets once a week, 3.9% consumed sweets several times a month and 5.2% never consumed sweets. Evidence of the frequency of consumption of cakes and biscuits showed that 13.1% of the subjects consumed cakes and biscuits several times a day, 40.5% consumed them every day, 28.4% consumed them several times a week, 10.8% consumed them once a week, 3.6% consumed them several times a month and 3.6% never consumed them. A preponderance of females was observed for the daily consumption of sweets (p = 0.024) and cakes and biscuits (p = 0.011). Male adolescents more frequently consumed coffee with sugar when compared with female adolescents (p = 0.023). No sex differences were found with respect to the consumption of other dietary factors (fresh fruit, soft drinks, jam/honey, chewing gum, milk with sugar, and coffee with sugar) in this study. A correlation between SES and dietary habits was found only for the habit of drinking coffee with sugar, whereas participants with a high SES consumed significantly less coffee with sugar than did participants with an average or low SES (p = 0.030). The most relevant differences and similarities related to the results of the frequency of consumption of other dietary factors (fresh fruit, soft drinks, jam/honey, chewing gum, milk with sugar, coffee with sugar) affecting OH, are presented in the Table 6. No significant correlation was found between SES and dietary habits (Table 7). In the tables, the main differences and similarities are presented. The survey consisted of 21 items, and the value for Cronbach’s alpha was 0.737, indicating that the reliability of the sample was acceptable.

4. Discussion

Bosnia and Herzegovina lack surveys of oral health conducted at the national level, as no such a survey has been conducted in the past 30 years. This is the first study that aimed to evaluate the risk factors, behaviours and self-perceptions of OH status among adolescents in the Tuzla Canton (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Previously, the poor oral OH of adolescents of Bosnia and Herzegovina was indicated by very high DMFT and SCI scores [12,24]. This study revealed a significant disproportion between self-perceived dental and periodontal health and the frequency of dental visits due to toothache or periodontal problems. Most of the participants perceived their dental and periodontal health as good or very good (90%), although 41.5% of them had to visit dentist due to dental or periodontal problems. This study revealed that although 76.47% of the adolescents visit a dentist at least once a year, for 41.5% of them, the main reason for the visit was toothache. Compared with other national studies, our findings corroborated the findings of Davidovic et al. [25] (43.9%) and were higher than findings of Obradovic and Dolic [26] (25.5%). Additionally, our results are in accordance with the results of other nonnational studies [27,28,29]. During the last 12 months females visited a dental office more frequently than males (p < 0.005). The percentage of adolescents (93.16%) who brushed their teeth 2–6 times daily was almost identical to that of their peers from the capital of Sarajevo (92.85%) and substantially greater than that of their peers from the country’s second largest city of Banja Luka (56%) and from Eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina (54.9%) [25,30,31] In this study, the prevalence of adolescents who brushed their teeth 2–6 times daily was greater compared to that of their peers from Croatia (70%), Portugal (87.9%), Romania (67.3%), Sweden (89.2%), Italy (83%) and Southeast China (50.9%) [15,27,32,33]. Females showed less frequent brushing behaviour twice a day in comparison to males, which does not align with previous surveys (p < 0.0001) [34,35]. Almost all adolescents used toothbrushes and toothpaste to clean their teeth, which was in accordance with previous findings [26,33,35,36]. Even though all the participants used toothbrushes and toothpaste to clean their teeth, only 12.4% of them used toothpaste with fluoride, similar to the results of other national studies [25,26,30] and significantly lower than those of recent international studies [15,37]. Among the 52.3% of adolescents who flossed their teeth, boys were more likely to avoid flossing teeth than girls were (p < 0.0001). Flossing frequency was significantly greater in this study than in other studies [15,26,33]. When dental appearance was considered, more than 50% of the subjects were dissatisfied and reported negative perceptions of their dental appearance. This value was significantly higher in comparison to reports of adolescents from China (24%) and Australia (31%) [38,39]. The percentage of adolescents (12%) who avoid smiling due to the appearance of their teeth in this study was not particularly different from the findings of other studies [39,40]. In our study, female adolescents were more satisfied than male adolescents with the appearance of their teeth (p = 0.008). There is evidence that juveniles are more sensitive to a variety of impacts, such as appearance, relative to older individuals. The importance of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is particularly relevant for adolescents from the aspect of the ability to contrive a social connection with other people [41]. Satisfaction with dental appearance is closely related to dental malocclusion wherein OHRQL significantly improves when dental malocclusion is corrected with orthodontic treatment [42,43]. In this study, 22.8% of the adolescents reported occasional pain related to their teeth and jaws, where 5–10% of the participants reported chewing difficulties and difficulty biting hard foods, suggesting that orthodontic or temporomandibular joint treatment might prevent further deterioration of signs and symptoms related to those complaints [44]. It was determined that adolescents in the Tuzla Canton consume more sweets on a daily basis (43.14%) in this study compared to studies conducted in the two largest cities in the country. Adolescents from other parts of Sarajevo (38.5) and Banja Luka (39.14%) and less frequently than their peers from the Central Bosnian Canton (56.8%) [26,45,46]. The frequency of sweet consumption once and several times a day (53.9%) was almost the same as that in Sarajevo (53.2%). and agreed with the results of previous studies [45,47]. In the present study, female adolescents had worse results in terms of certain oral health behaviours and perceptions than male adolescents did. The frequency of eating cakes and biscuits (p = 0.011) and sweets (p = 0.024) was more significant in females than in males, which could be a reason why female adolescents more frequently reported an occasional pain related to teeth or gums (p < 0.0001). Additionally, female adolescents less frequently brushed their teeth twice a day (p < 0.0001) and were more dissatisfied with the appearance of their teeth and gums (p < 0.008). On the other hand, they presented a relatively high frequency of flossing (p < 0.001) and brushing 3–5 times daily (p < 0.0001). In general, female adolescents had, to a certain extent, worse OH behaviours, perceptions and dietary habits than males did, and these findings were not in compliance with similar studies [48,49,50]. Adolescence is a period in which risky health behaviour, such as poor food choices, inadequate diet and inadequate maintenance of oral hygiene are often demonstrated. Additionally, adolescence represents an important period for the acceptance of positive health habits that could be prolonged into adulthood and last throughout life [17]. Adolescents can recognize the importance of OH from the aspects of their appearance, food consumption, and confidence. To maintain adequate OH throughout life, it is essential to adopt and develop good OH habits during the period of adolescence [17,51]. Oral diseases have a psychological, physical, and social consequences on adolescents’ lives. A recent systematic umbrella review reported that “dental caries, malocclusion, temporomandibular disorders, dental trauma, poor brushing, toothache, periodontal disease, and edentulism have a negative impact on OHRQoL. In addition, social determinants, such as demographic and socioeconomic factors, such as being an only child, growing up in a nuclear family, housing area and security, level of parental education, access to dental care and the performance of health promotion programs are directly proportional to OHRQoL and self-perception in adolescents” [52]. SES evaluation represents an important determinant from the aspects of adolescents’ behaviours, attitudes and conditions of OH. In the study, no statistically significant association was found between OH behaviours, perceptions, dietary habits and socioeconomic status. Our findings were not in consistent with those of earlier investigations, where a high correlation between the level of SES and frequency of toothbrushing were determined [53,54]. Additionally, our findings were opposite to the findings of other national surveys regarding the association between SES and frequency of sweets consumption [45,46]. In contrast, other studies reported a high correlation between the level of SES and OH status, showing that adolescents with low SES had a significant negative impact on oral health behaviours and OH status in general later in life [19,45,52,55,56]. Disparities in caries experience, however, cannot be accounted for by SES-associated differences in brushing, flossing, sealant use, fluoride exposure, or the frequency of use of dental services [57]. School-based OH programmes might help promote OH [1]. “The techniques taught to students in schools in Western industrialized nations, such as the USA, Canada, Denmark, the UK and Sweden were related mainly to preventive dental measures and dental health guidance. In contrast, training schools in South Korea and Japan placed less emphasis on dental preventive measures and dental health guidance [58]”. The key provider of health promotion and preventive work in dental care is the dental hygienist”. The dental hygienist profession is one of the few in which the primary function of the practitioner is to prevent oral disease and to promote patients’ well-being [58,59]. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, only the Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of Sarajevo has a dental hygiene program that provides education and clinical training in dental hygiene. “The educators held a general respect and appreciation for the dental hygienist profession. They felt that dental hygienists’ skills ought to be more useful in orthodontics and preventive care than is customary today, including in tobacco prevention and smoking cessation as well as in dietary instruction among adults [56]. If indicated, these oral health programs should aim to change behaviours, attitudes and habits from the earliest school years.

5. Conclusions

The OH behaviours, perceptions and dietary habits of adolescents in the Tuzla Canton were rather similar to those of their peers from other parts of the country. Over forty percent of the adolescents consumed sugary foods on a daily basis and visited the dental office only in the case of pain. More frequent dental visits and occasional toothaches might be correlated with significantly greater sugar intake in female adolescents than in male adolescents. No association between SES and oral health behaviours, perceptions and risk factors were detected. In general, Bosnia and Herzegovina need an OH prevention program designed for high schools and dental hygiene programs that will be part of the regular education curriculum at all dental medicine faculties in the country. Although certain OH behaviours and dietary habits were at a satisfactory level, additional effort through continuous education should be made to improve individual OH status.

Limitations of the Study

The decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index was not included used for the assessment of oral health status. As clinical variables were not included the results should be read with caution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H. and K.D.; methodology, J.H., E.H. and A.T.; analysis, resources and investigation, J.H., K.D. and E.H.; drafting the work, K.D.; reviewing, K.D., J.H. and J.M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Sarajevo.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tai, B.; Du, M.; Peng, B.; Fan, M.; Bian, Z. Experiences from a school-based oral health promotion programme in Wuhan city, PR China. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2001, 11, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Riley, P.; Worthington, H.V.; Clarkson, J.E.; Beirne, P.V. Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, CD004346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Heyman, H.; Swift, E.J.; Ritter, A.V. Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, 6th ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moynihan, P.; Makino, Y.; Petersen, P.E.; Ogawa, H. Implications of WHO guideline on sugars for dental health professionals. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2018, 46, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, E.J.; Han, S.J. The effect of proximal cleaning devices on periodontal status in Korean adults between 2016 and 2018. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gift, H.C.; Atchison, K.A.; Dayton, C.M. Conceptualizing oral health and oral health-related quality of life. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997, 44, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marmot, M.; Bell, R. Social determinants and dental health. Adv. Dent. Res. 2011, 23, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petersen, P.E. The World Oral Health Report; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jepsen S, Blanco J, Buchalla W, Carvalho JC, Dietrich T, Dörfer C, Eaton KA, Figuero E, Frencken JE, Graziani F, Higham SM, Kocher T, Maltz M, Ortiz-Vigon A, Schmoeckel J, Sculean A, Tenuta LM, van der Veen MH, Machiulskiene V. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Mar;44 Suppl 18:S85-S93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Consequences and preventive strategies. In The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Chicago, IL, USA, 2023; pp. 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  11. Karamehmedovic, E.; Bajric, E.; Virtanen, J.I. Oral health behaviour of nine-year-old children and their parents in Sarajevo. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Obradović, M.; Dolić, O.; Milovanović, V.; Karaman, N.; Mišić, M.; Miljević, V.; Matošević-Jajčanin, S.; Sukara, S.; Kaurin, P.; Knežević, N.; et al. Caries experience in primary and permanent dentition in children up to 15 years of age from Bosnia and Herzegovina-a retrospective study. Children 2023, 10, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomson, W.M.; Poulton, R.; Milne, B.J.; Caspi, A.; Broughton, J.R.; Ayers, K.M.S. Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in childhood and adulthood in a birth cohort. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2004, 32, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ericsson, J.S.; Östberg, A.L.; Wennström, J.L.; Abrahamsson, K.H. Oral health-related perceptions, attitudes, and behavior in relation to oral hygiene conditions in an adolescent population. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2012, 120, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Graça, S.R.; Albuquerque, T.S.; Luis, H.S.; Assunção, V.A.; Malmqvist, S.; Cuculescu, M.; Slusanschi, O.; Johannsen, G.; Galuscan, A.; Podariu, A.C.; et al. Oral health knowledge, perceptions, and habits of adolescents from Portugal, Romania, and Sweden: A comparative study. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2019, 9, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Karamehmedovic, E.; Petersen, P.E.; Agdal, M.L.; Virtanen, J.I. Improving oral health of children in four Balkan countries: A qualitative study among health professionals. Front. Oral Health 2023, 3, 1068384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Honkala, E.; Karvonen, S.; Rimpelä, A.; Rajalä, M.; Rimpelä, M.; Prättälä, R. Oral health promotion among Finnish adolescents between 1977 and 1989. Health Promot. Int. 1991, 6, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elamin, A.; Garemo, M.; Gardner, A. Dental caries and their association with socioeconomic characteristics, oral hygiene practices and eating habits among preschool children in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates—The NOPLAS project. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gazzaz, A.Z.; Carpiano, R.M.; Aleksejuniene, J. Socioeconomic status, social support, and oral health-risk behaviors in Canadian adolescents. J. Public Health Dent. 2021, 81, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Safiri, S.; Kelishadi, R.; Heshmat, R.; Rahimi, A.; Djalalinia, S.; Ghasemian, A.; Sheidaei, A.; Motlagh, M.E.; Ardalan, G.; Mansourian, M.; et al. Socioeconomic inequality in oral health behavior in Iranian children and adolescents by the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method: The CASPIAN- IV study. Int. J. Equity Health 2016, 15, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Susarla, S.M.; Trimble, M.; Sokal-Gutierrez, K. Cross-sectional analysis of oral healthcare vs. general healthcare utilization in five low- and middle-income countries. Front. Oral Health 2022, 3, 911110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zovko, R.; Cvitanović, S.; Mabić, M.; Ćorić, A.; Vukojević, K.; Goršeta, K.; Glavina, D. The prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs of school children in Northern Herzegovina. Acta Med. Acad. 2017, 46, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. World Health Organization. Annex 8: WHO oral health questionnaire for children. In Oral health SURVEYS: Basic Methods, 5th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  24. Markovic, N.; Muratbegovic, A.S.; Kobaslija, S.; Bajric, E.; Selimovic-Dragas, M.; Huseinbegovic, A. Caries prevalence of children and adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Med. Acad. 2013, 42, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Davidovic, B.; Ivanovic, M.; Jankovic, S.; Lecic, J. Awareness, attitudes and behavior of children towards oral health. Mil. Med. Rev. 2014, 71, 949–956. [Google Scholar]
  26. Obradovic, M.; Dolic, O. Caries prevalence and risk factors for its development in urban and rural regions. Serbian Dent. J. 2008, 55, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pellizzer, C.; Pejda, S.; Špalj, S.; Plancak, D. Unrealistic optimism and demographic influence on oral health-related behavior and perception in adolescents in Croatia. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2007, 41, 205–215. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rajab, L.D.; Petersen, P.E.; Bakaeen, G.; Hamdan, M.A. Oral health behaviour of schoolchildren and parents in Jordan. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2002, 12, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Farsi, J.M.A.; Farghaly, M.M.; Farsi, N. Oral health knowledge, attitude and behaviour among Saudi school students in Jeddah City. J. Dent. 2004, 32, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. 30 Zukanovic, A.; Beslagic, E.; Dedic, A.; Ganibegovic, M. Evaluation efficacy of risk factors in caries risk assessment of 12- year-olds. Stomatol. Rev. 2012, 1, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dolic, O.; Vojinovic, J.; Djukanovic, D.; Cupic, S.; Sukara, S.; Obradovic, M.; Kojic, Z.; Trtic, N. Caries prevalence in the primary and permanent dentition of rural and urban children in the municipality of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina. OHDMBSC 2010, 9, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  32. Su, S.; Zhang, J.; Deng, R.; Wang, W.; Cui, T.; Su, Y.; Li, X. Oral health status and associated factors among 12 to 15-year-old Chinese adolescents in Southeast China: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 2024, 103, e37080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sbricoli, L.; Bernardi, L.; Ezeddine, F.; Bacci, C.; Di Fiore, A. Oral hygiene in adolescence: A questionnaire-based study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Laganà, G.; Abazi, Y.; Beshiri Nastasi, E.; Vinjolli, F.; Fabi, F.; Divizia, M.; Cozza, P. Oral health conditions in an Albanian adolescent population: An epidemiological study. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bahannan, S.A.; Eltelety, S.M.; Hassan, M.H.; Ibrahim, S.S.; Amer, H.A.; El Meligy, O.A.; Al-Johani, K.A.; Kayal, R.A.; Mokeem, A.A.; Qutob, A.F.; et al. Oral and dental health status among adolescents with limited access to dental care services in Jeddah. Dent. J. 2018, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mendes, A.D.C. Prevalencia de Doencas Periodontais em Amostra Populacional da Provincia de Maputo, Mocambique. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mepatia, A.I.; Myburgh, N.; Barrie, R.; Kimmie-Dhansay, F. Self-assessment of dental health status, behaviours and oral health risk factors among adolescents from public schools in Maputo City-Mozambique. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jiang, H.; Petersen, P.E.; Peng, B.; Tai, B.; Bian, Z. Self-assessed dental health, oral health practices, and general health behaviors in Chinese urban adolescents. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2005, 63, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mayze, L.; Pawlak, J.; Rogers, M.; Smith, M. Oral health of adolescents in the Colac-Otway Shire. Aust. J. Rural. Health 2019, 27, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Silva, A.L.A.; Mattos, I.E.; Carmo, C.N. Factors associated with self-rated oral health in adolescents in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil, 2014. Ann. Dent. Oral Health 2018, 2, 1008. [Google Scholar]
  41. Maida, C.A.; Marcus, M.; Hays, R.D.; Coulter, I.D.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Lee, S.Y.; McClory, P.S.; Van, L.V.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; et al. Child and adolescent perceptions of oral health over the life course. Qual. Life Res. 2015, 24, 2739–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Demirovic, K.; Habibovic, J.; Dzemidzic, V.; Tiro, A.; Nakas, E. Comparison of oral health-related quality of life in treated and non-treated orthodontic patients. Med. Arch. 2019, 73, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bernabe, E.; Sheiham, A.; Tsakos, G.; de Oliveira, C.M. The impact of orthodontic treatment on the quality of life in adolescents: A case-control study. Eur. J. Orthod. 2008, 30, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Demirovic, K.; Dzemidzic, V.; Nakas, E. Impact of stabilization splint therapy on orthodontic diagnosis in patients with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zukanović, A.; Nakaš, E.; Marković, N.; Arslanagić, A. Socioeconomic condition and dietary habits in relation to oral health in 12-year-old children from Sarajevo, Bosnia-Hercegovina. South Eur. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Res. 2018, 5, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saban, A.; Ridic, O.; Karamehic, J.; Saban, O.; Delic-Sarac, M.; Dzananovic, N.; Coric, J.; Ridic, G.; Panjeta, M. Assessments of the socioeconomic status and diet on the prevalence of dental caries at school children in Central Bosnian Canton. Mater. Socio-Med. 2014, 26, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Milona, M.; Janiszewska-Olszowska, J.; Szmidt, M.; Kłoda, K.; Olszowski, T. Oral health related behaviors in relation to DMFT indexes of teenagers in an urban area of North-West Poland-dental caries is still a common problem. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vettore, M.V.; Moysés, S.J.; Sardinha, L.M.V.; Iser, B.P.M. Socioeconomic status, toothbrushing frequency, and health-related behaviors in adolescents: An analysis using the PeNSE database. Cad. Saúde Pública 2012, 28, s101–s113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sfeatcu, R.; Balgiu, B.A.; Mihai, C.; Petre, A.; Pantea, M.; Tribus, L. Gender differences in oral health: Self-reported attitudes, values, behaviours and literacy among Romanian adults. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Su, S.; Lipsky, M.S.; Licari, F.W.; Hung, M. Comparing oral health behaviours of men and women in the United States. J. Dent. 2022, 122, 104157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bombert, F.; Manso, A.C.; Ferreira, C.S.; Nogueira, P.; Nunes, C. Sociodemographic factors associated with oral health in 12-year-old adolescents: Hygiene behaviours and health appointments. A cross-sectional national study in Portugal. Int. Dent. J. 2018, 68, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chimbinha, Í.G.M.; Ferreira, B.N.C.; Miranda, G.P.; Guedes, R.S. Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: Umbrella review. BMC Public Health 2023, 23, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peres, K.G.; Cascaes, A.M.; Leão, A.T.T.; Côrtes, M.I.D.S.; Vettore, M.V. Sociodemographic and clinical aspects of quality of life related to oral health in adolescents. Rev. Saúde Pública 2013, 47, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cepova, E.; Cicvakova, M.; Kolarcik, P.; Markovska, N.; Geckova, A.M. Associations of multidimensional health literacy with reported oral health promoting behaviour among Slovak adults: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yamamoto-Kuramoto, K.; Kusama, T.; Kiuchi, S.; Kondo, K.; Osaka, K.; Takeuchi, K.; Aida, J. Lower socio-economic status in adolescence is associated with poor oral health at an older age: Mediation by social and behavioural factors. Gerodontology 2023, 40, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Meira, G.F.; Knorst, J.K.; Maroneze, M.C.; Ortiz, F.R.; Ardenghi, T.M. Effect of dental caries and socioeconomic status on social capital throughout adolescence: A 6-year follow-up. Braz. Oral Res. 2020, 34, e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Polk, D.E.; Weyant, R.J.; Manz, M.C. Socioeconomic factors in adolescents’ oral health: Are they mediated by oral hygiene behaviors or preventive interventions? Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2010, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Inukai, J.; Sakurai, M.; Nakagaki, H.; Matsui, K.; Matsuda, H.; Tamura, K.; Danielsen, B.; Rowbotham, J.; Kosaka, T. Comparison of clinical practice education in dental hygiene schools in eight countries. Int. Dent. J. 2012, 62, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Virtanen, J.I.; Pellikka, E.; Singh, S.; Widström, E. The professional role of a dental hygienist in Finland—Educators’ views. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2016, 14, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Sociodemographic data.
Table 1. Sociodemographic data.
N %
Sex Male 123 40.2
Female 183 59.8
Age 15 years 54 17.6
16 years 76 24.8
17 years 46 15.0
18 years 130 42.5
Mean 16.82
SD 1.16
Min.–Max. 15–18
Socioeconomic status Below average 132 43.1
Average 140 45.8
Above average 34 11.1
Total 306 100.0
Table 2. Oral health behaviours and oral hygiene habits in relation to sex differences.
Table 2. Oral health behaviours and oral hygiene habits in relation to sex differences.
Variables Sex, n (%) χ2 Value p Value
Male Female
Dental visits within the past 12 months 16.877 0.005
Never 26 (21.1) 23 (12.6)
4 times 15 (12.2) 41 (22.4)
Reason for the last dental visit 6.498 0.090
Pain or problem with teeth or gums 53 (43.1) 74 (40.4)
Frequency of toothbrushing 41.539 0.0001
Twice a day 87 (70.7) 107 (58.5)
Three to five times a day 17 (13.8) 73 (39.9)
Toothbrush usage
Yes 123 (100) 183 (100)
Toothpaste usage 0.080 0.643
Yes 122 (99.2) 182 (99.5)
Fluoridated toothpaste usage 0.928 0.215
No 105 (85.4) 163 (89.1)
Use of wooden toothpicks 4.462 0.023
No 68 (55.3) 123 (67.2)
Use of plastic toothpicks 0.0257 0.362
No 101 (82.1) 146 (79.8)
Use of dental floss 9.659 0.001
Yes 51 (41.5) 109 (59.6)
Use of miswak 1.810 0.140
No 114 (92.7) 176 (96.2)
Notes: Significant at p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Table 3. Oral health behaviours and oral hygiene habits according to socioeconomic status.
Table 3. Oral health behaviours and oral hygiene habits according to socioeconomic status.
Variables Socioeconomic Status, n (%) χ2 Value p Value
Below Average Average Above Average
Dental visits within the past 12 months 8.239 0.605
Never 26 (19.7) 20 (14.3) 3 (8.8)
4 times 24 (18.2) 22 (15.7) 10 (29.4)
Reason for the last dental visit 12.034 0.061
Pain or problem with teeth or gums 57 (43.2) 60 (42.9) 10 (29.4)
Frequency of toothbrushing 14.906 0.0061
Twice a day 89 (67.4) 83 (59.3) 22 (64.7)
Three to five times a day 32 (24.2) 47 (33.6) 11 (32.4)
Toothbrush usage
Yes 132 (100) 140 (100) 34 (100)
Toothpaste usage 3.616 0.164
Yes 132 (100) 139 (99.3) 33 (97.1)
Fluoridated toothpaste usage 0.594 0.743
No 114 (86.4) 123 (87.9) 31 (91.2)
Use of wooden toothpicks 0.150 0.928
No 81 (61.4) 88 (62.9) 22 (64.7)
Use of plastic toothpicks 0.047 0.977
No 107 (81.1) 113 (80.7) 27 (79.4)
Dental floss usage 2.427 0.297
Yes 68 (51.5) 70 (50) 22 (64.7)
Use of miswak 3.499 0.174
No 127 (96.2) 133 (95) 30 (88.2)
Notes: p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Table 4. Perceptions of oral health in relation to sex differences.
Table 4. Perceptions of oral health in relation to sex differences.
Variables Sex, n (%) χ2 Value p Value
Male Female
Perceived state of teeth 4.942 0.423
Good 60 (48.8) 87 (47.5)
Perceived state of gums 0.937 0.968
Good 44 (35.8) 70 (38.3)
Toothache experience in the last 12 months 16.148 0.001
Occasionally 24 (19.5) 46 (25.1)
Rarely 50 (40.7) 95 (51.9)
Satisfaction with the appearance of teeth 9.742 0.008
Dissatisfied 35 (28.5) 79 (43.2)
Avoiding smiling due to the state of teeth 1.918 0.383
Not avoiding 107 (87) 150 (82)
Made fun of by other children about teeth 0.413 0.813
No 118 (95.9) 178 (97.3)
Avoiding school due to toothache 0.522 0.770
No 119 (96.7) 175 (95.6)
Difficulty biting food 1.072 0.585
No 115 (93.5) 165 (90.2)
Difficulty chewing 0.129 0.937
No 116 (94.3) 172 (94)
Notes: p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Table 5. Perceptions of oral health in relation to socioeconomic status.
Table 5. Perceptions of oral health in relation to socioeconomic status.
Variables Socioeconomic Status, n (%) χ2 Value p Value
Below Average Average Above Average
Perceived state of teeth 16.513 0.086
Good 69 (52.3) 63 (45) 15 (44.1)
Perceived state of gums 14.969 0.144
Good 60 (45.5) 45 (32.1) 9 (26.5)
Toothache experience in the last 12 months 6.574 0.362
Occasionally 35 (26.5) 30 (21.4) 5 (14.7)
Rarely 63 (47.7) 67 (47.9) 15 (44.1)
Satisfaction with appearance of teeth 3.038 0.552
Dissatisfied 49 (37.1) 53 (37.9) 12 (35.3)
Avoiding smiling due to the state of teeth 8.274 0.082
Not avoiding smiling 103 (78) 122 (87.1) 32 (94.1)
Made fun of by other children about teeth 2.505 0.644
No 129 (97.7) 134 (95.7) 33 (97.1)
Avoiding school due to toothache 0.455 0.978
No 126 (95.5) 135 (96.4) 33 (97.1)
Difficulty biting food 3.513 0.476
No 117 (88.6) 130 (92.9) 33 (97.1)
Difficulty chewing 6.289 0.179
No 121 (91.7) 135 (96.4) 32 (94.1)
Notes: p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Table 6. Comparison of dietary habits between male and female adolescents.
Table 6. Comparison of dietary habits between male and female adolescents.
Variables Frequency Sex, n (%) χ2 Value p Value
Male Female
Eats fruits Every day 57 (46.3) 100 (54.6) 6.637 0.249
Eats biscuits and cake Every day 44 (35.8) 80 (43.7) 14.851 0.011
Drinks juices Several times a week 38 (30.9) 55 (30.1) 0.721 0.982
Eats jam and honey Several times a week 28 (22.8) 45 (24.6) 3.926 0.560
Consumes sugar gum Every day 27 (22) 68 (37.2) 14.464 0.013
Eats sweets Every day 41 (33.3) 91 (49.7) 12.946 0.024
Drinks milk with sugar Several times a week 29 (23.6) 33 (18) 2.950 0.708
Drinks tea with sugar Several times a week 41 (33.3) 48 (26.2) 6.273 0.281
Drinks coffee with sugar Several times a week 28 (22.8) 20 (10.9) 13.077 0.023
Notes: p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Table 7. Dietary habits in relation to socioeconomic status.
Table 7. Dietary habits in relation to socioeconomic status.
Variables Frequency Socioeconomic status, n (%) χ2 value p value
Below average Average Above average
Eats fruit Every day 68 (51.5) 71 (50.7) 18 (52.9) 12.135 0.276
Eats biscuits and cake Every day 52 (39.4) 64 (45.7) 8 (23.5) 16.940 0.076
Drinks juices Several times a week 38 (28.8) 45 (32.1) 10 (29.4) 15.084 0.129
Eats jam and honey Several times a week 31 (23.5) 35 (25) 7 (20.6) 3.953 0.949
Consumes sugar gum Every day 43 (32.6) 44 (31.4) 8 (23.5) 12.249 0.269
Eats sweets Every day 46 (34.8) 72 (51.4) 14 (41.2) 17.098 0.072
Drinks milk with sugar Several times a week 19 (14.4) 35 (25) 8 (23.5) 10.317 0.413
Drinks tea with sugar Several times a week 43 (32.6) 37 (26.4) 9 (26.5) 5.477 0.857
Drinks coffee with sugar Several times a week 22 (16.7) 24 (17.1) 2 (5.9) 19.925 0.030
Notes: p < 0.05. Chi square test was used.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated