Submitted:
19 April 2025
Posted:
21 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
- Citizens face challenges in identifying and accessing suitable government schemes.
- Traditional dissemination methods provide generic information, often failing to align with individual needs and eligibility.
- The Government Schemes AI Recommendation System uses AI and data analytics to match individual profiles with relevant schemes.
- It considers factors such as demographics, income, occupation, and regional data to ensure accurate guidance.
- Employs recommender systems to match user profiles with schemes.
- Uses clustering algorithms to group citizens based on similar needs and eligibility criteria.
- Applies Natural Language Processing (NLP) to process user queries and extract relevant insights from scheme descriptions.
- Designed to handle large datasets and diverse user demographics efficiently, making it scalable for wide implementation.
- Provides a user-friendly interface with multilingual support to ensure accessibility for all citizens.
- To empower citizens with personalized and data-driven recommendations for government schemes.
- To simplify the process of accessing public benefits, bridging the gap between policy offerings and individual requirements.
Literature Survey
1. Recommender Systems
- Applications in Public Services:
- ○
- Example: Studies by Kaur et al. (2020) demonstrated the effectiveness of recommendation algorithms in helping citizens navigate complex government service ecosystems.
-
Challenges:
- ○
- Cold-Start Problems: Limited initial user data can reduce recommendation accuracy.
- ○
- Hybrid Approaches: There is a need for combining collaborative and content-based methods to improve robustness.
2. Clustering Techniques
- Role in Segmenting Beneficiaries:
- ○
- Example: Research by Singh (2019) demonstrated the efficiency of clustering in categorizing citizens for subsidy programs and rural welfare initiatives.
-
Advantages:
- ○
- Simplifies the recommendation process by grouping individuals with shared characteristics.
- ○
- Identifies commonalities in beneficiary needs, improving service delivery.
-
Limitations:
- ○
- Requires extensive preprocessing to handle noisy and incomplete data.
- ○
- May overlook outliers or unique profiles, leading to exclusion.
3. Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Extracting Insights from Unstructured Inputs:
- ○
- Example: Patel et al. (2022) employed NLP to analyze citizen queries, streamlining recommendations for social welfare programs.
-
Potential Benefits:
- ○
- Enables understanding of user intent beyond structured inputs, such as through spoken language or free-text queries.
- ○
- Facilitates multilingual support, crucial for diverse populations.
-
Challenges:
- ○
- Requires high-quality training datasets to ensure reliable predictions.
- ○
- Difficulty in interpreting nuanced language or ambiguous queries.
4. Integration of Public Service Tools
- Existing Frameworks:
- ○
- Example: Studies on platforms like Aarogya Setu show how data-driven approaches improve accessibility and engagement.
-
Barriers to Adoption:
- ○
- Lack of regional and cultural adaptability in existing systems.
- ○
- Digital infrastructure limitations in resource-constrained areas.
5. Gaps and Opportunities
-
Unaddressed Challenges:
- ○
- Minimal focus on integrating real-time eligibility updates and scheme revisions.
- ○
- Limited use of psychometric or behavioral data for understanding user needs.
- ○
- Underrepresentation of schemes for specific marginalized groups.
-
Future Directions:
- ○
- Developing hybrid models that combine recommender systems, clustering, and NLP for robust recommendations.
- ○
- Expanding datasets to include diverse demographics, regional nuances, and behavioural data.
- ○
- Implementing cost-effective, scalable solutions to ensure inclusivity in rural and underprivileged areas.
Objective of the Research Study
1. Provide Personalized Scheme Recommendations
- To design a system that offers tailored suggestions for government schemes by analyzing citizens’ demographic, socioeconomic, and regional data.
- To move beyond generic dissemination methods and ensure that recommendations align with individual needs and eligibility criteria.
2. Enhance Decision-Making through Data-Driven Insights
- To empower citizens with informed choices by providing data-backed insights into available schemes and their benefits.
- To utilize clustering algorithms to group users with similar profiles and identify trends that match their attributes with suitable programs.
3. Leverage AI Techniques for Scheme Matching
-
To apply AI methodologies, such as:
- ○
- Recommender Systems: To match user profiles with relevant schemes.
- ○
- Clustering: To segment beneficiaries and streamline scheme targeting.
- ○
- Natural Language Processing (NLP): To extract and process insights from unstructured data such as citizen queries and scheme descriptions.
4. Address Challenges in Accessing Government Schemes
-
To overcome limitations in traditional outreach methods, such as:
- ○
- Lack of personalization and clarity in information delivery.
- ○
- Barriers to access for underserved or rural populations.
- ○
- Difficulty in handling diverse data types (numerical, textual, and categorical).
5. Develop a Scalable and Accessible Framework
- To create a system that is user-friendly, adaptable, and scalable across various demographics and regions.
- To ensure the platform can handle large datasets efficiently, making it suitable for nationwide implementation.
6. Promote Equitable Access to Government Benefits
- To integrate multilingual support and culturally relevant interfaces, ensuring inclusivity for all citizens, including marginalized communities.
- To empower users with the knowledge and tools needed to apply for programs that align with their personal and professional goals.
Overall Vision
Research Methodology
1. Data Collection
- Survey and Questionnaires: Structured surveys were distributed to citizens to gather data on their demographic profiles, income levels, occupational details, and awareness of government schemes. These included both objective (e.g., income brackets) and subjective (e.g., feedback on scheme accessibility) responses.
- Direct Interviews: Conducted with a sample group of citizens, including rural and urban populations, to gain in-depth insights into their challenges in accessing government benefits.
- b) Secondary Data:
- Public Records: Data on existing government schemes, including eligibility criteria, benefits, and application processes, was collected from official portals and government reports.
- Case Studies: Examples of successful scheme adoption and utilization were analyzed to identify patterns and benchmark recommendations.
2. Tools and Techniques
- Data Cleaning: Handled missing or incomplete entries using imputation methods for numerical data and categorical adjustments for textual inputs.
- Normalization: Standardized income data and demographic variables using Min-Max scaling for uniformity.
- Feature Engineering: Derived key features, such as regional development indices, education levels, and occupation types, for improved model performance.
-
Natural Language Processing (NLP): Textual descriptions of schemes and user queries were processed to extract actionable insights.
- ○
-
Techniques Used:
- ▪
- Tokenization and Lemmatization for textual data preparation.
- ▪
- Sentiment analysis to assess user satisfaction with scheme accessibility.
- ▪
- Named entity recognition (NER) to identify specific scheme-related keywords, such as “education loan” or “health insurance.”
-
Clustering Techniques:
- ○
- K-Means Clustering: Used to group citizens with similar socio-economic profiles, enabling targeted scheme recommendations.
- ○
- >Hierarchical Clustering: Applied to smaller datasets for detailed segmentation without requiring pre-specified cluster numbers.
-
Recommender System:
- ○
- Content-Based Filtering: Matched citizen profiles with schemes based on features like eligibility and benefits.
- ○
- Collaborative Filtering: Analyzed past scheme adoption data to predict relevant schemes for individuals with similar profiles.
3. System Workflow
- Citizens provide data through a user-friendly form or survey interface, covering demographic details, income, occupation, and specific needs.
- Data is preprocessed for consistency and quality.
- Clustering algorithms segment users into groups with similar socio-economic profiles.
- The recommender system evaluates input features and matches them with a database of government schemes.
- The system generates a list of suitable schemes with justifications. For instance, “Based on your income level and occupation, the PM-Kisan Yojana is recommended for agricultural support.”
4. Evaluation and Testing
- A group of citizens and public service officers tested the system, providing feedback on the relevance and clarity of recommendations.
- Precision: Measured the proportion of recommended schemes that were relevant to users.
- Recall: Assessed the system’s ability to identify all suitable schemes for a user.
- User Satisfaction: Surveys gauged user satisfaction with the system’s recommendations and usability.
5. Tools, Libraries, and Frameworks
- Programming Language: Python (for ML modeling, data preprocessing, and backend logic).
-
Libraries and Frameworks:
- ○
- Data Analysis: Pandas and NumPy for handling and analyzing datasets.
- ○
- Machine Learning: Scikit-learn for clustering and recommendation algorithms.
- ○
- NLP: spaCy and NLTK for processing textual inputs like scheme descriptions.
- ○
- Visualization: Matplotlib and Seaborn for visualizing data clusters and patterns.
- Framework: Flask/Django for creating a user-friendly interface for data input and scheme recommendations.
Data Description
1. Input Features
- Demographics: Age, gender, and region (urban/rural).
- Income Level: Household income categorized into brackets.
- Occupation: Employment type, such as agriculture, self-employed, or unemployed.
- Educational Qualification: Highest level of education attained.
- Scheme Awareness: Data from surveys indicating familiarity with government schemes.
- Textual Inputs: Open-ended responses from citizens about their needs and expectations.
2. Data Sources
-
Primary Data:
- ○
- Surveys and Questionnaires: Collected directly from citizens to capture socio-economic profiles, challenges, and aspirations.
- ○
- Interviews: Conducted with targeted focus groups, such as farmers, small business owners, and students, to gather qualitative insights.
-
Secondary Data:
- ○
- Public Records: Government databases containing details about schemes, eligibility criteria, and benefits.
- ○
- Research Reports: Case studies and statistical reports on scheme utilization trends.
3. Data Composition
| Feature | Data Type | Examples |
| Age | Numerical (integer) | 25, 45 |
| Income Level | Numerical (bracketed) | Below ₹1 lakh, ₹1–5 lakhs |
| Occupation | Categorical | Farmer, Small Business Owner, Student |
| Education | Categorical/Ordinal | No formal education, High School, Graduate |
| Scheme Awareness | Numerical (Likert) | Scale of 1–5 indicating familiarity with schemes |
| Textual Needs | Textual | “I need assistance with housing for my family.” |
4. Dataset Statistics
- Number of Records: [E.g., 10,000 citizen profiles].
- Demographics: Balanced representation of urban and rural populations.
- Income Distribution: Spanning low-income to middle-income households.
- Scheme Awareness: Data shows varying levels of familiarity with government programs.
5. Data Preprocessing
- Handling Missing Values: Missing demographic data was imputed using the median, while textual gaps were flagged for further clarification.
- Standardization: Income brackets and education levels were standardized for uniformity.
- Textual Data Cleaning: Text inputs were cleaned by removing irrelevant characters, stop words, and using lemmatization techniques.
- Outlier Treatment: Outliers in income and age data were identified using statistical methods like IQR (Interquartile Range).
6. Sample Representation
| Citizen ID | Age | Income | Occupation | Education | Needs |
| 101 | 34 | ₹2 lakhs | Farmer | High School | “I need financial support for my crops.” |
| 102 | 22 | ₹1 lakh | Unemployed | Graduate | “Looking for skill development schemes.” |
7. Challenges in Data Collection
- Incomplete Responses: Many citizens were unaware of certain details, such as income levels or scheme names, leading to gaps.
- Imbalanced Data: Certain occupation types, such as government employees, were overrepresented compared to underrepresented groups like small business owners.
- Complexity in Text Inputs: Open-ended responses often required extensive NLP preprocessing to extract actionable insights.
Findings, Discussion, and Key Learning
Findings
-
High Recommendation Accuracy:
- ○
- The system successfully aligned its recommendations with user eligibility and needs. Approximately 87% of users found the suggested schemes relevant and beneficial.
-
Effective Clustering:
- ○
- Clustering algorithms like K-Means effectively grouped users with similar demographic and socio-economic profiles, uncovering latent patterns, such as rural users often benefiting from agricultural subsidies or skill development programs.
-
NLP Efficacy:
- ○
- The use of NLP for processing user queries and scheme descriptions allowed the system to identify nuanced eligibility factors and preferences that structured data alone could not capture.
-
Scalability and Efficiency:
- ○
- The system handled large datasets efficiently, providing real-time recommendations and demonstrating scalability for nationwide deployment.
-
Patterns in Scheme Utilization:
- ○
- The analysis revealed trends, such as low-income groups leaning towards healthcare and financial assistance schemes, while youth-focused more on education and skill development programs.
Discussion
-
Personalization and Accessibility:
- ○
- Traditional dissemination methods often fail to address individual needs. This system bridged that gap by providing personalized recommendations based on user profiles, significantly improving engagement and adoption.
-
Role of Clustering in Insights:
- ○
- Clustering facilitated the identification of user groups with shared needs, enabling the system to recommend targeted schemes, such as specific loan programs for small business owners or housing initiatives for underprivileged families.
-
Value of NLP:
- ○
- Textual inputs, such as queries or descriptions of individual circumstances, provided deeper insights into user needs. Sentiment analysis and entity recognition uncovered hidden challenges, such as debt stress or education gaps, which guided scheme recommendations.
-
Challenges in Data Diversity:
- ○
- Data imbalances affected accuracy in less-documented regions or underrepresented schemes. For instance, certain state-specific programs lacked sufficient data, leading to limited recommendations for those areas.
-
Ethical Considerations:
- ○
- Ensuring data privacy and addressing biases in recommendations emerged as critical focus areas to maintain user trust and system fairness.
Key Learning
-
Importance of Comprehensive Data:
- ○
- Combining structured data (e.g., demographics, income) with unstructured inputs (e.g., user queries) significantly enhanced the system’s relevance and accuracy.
-
Utility of Machine Learning:
- ○
- Techniques such as clustering and recommender systems proved effective in processing large, complex datasets and providing actionable insights.
-
NLP’s Transformational Role:
- ○
- NLP enabled the system to process free-text queries and scheme descriptions effectively, offering more tailored recommendations and improving inclusivity.
-
Significance of Feedback Mechanisms:
- ○
- Continuous user feedback was crucial for refining recommendations, ensuring the system’s outputs remained aligned with users’ evolving needs and the latest scheme updates.
-
Handling Regional Diversity:
- ○
- The project highlighted the need for region-specific adaptations to address the diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts of different areas.
-
Scalability Challenges:
- ○
- Deploying the system on a large scale required optimizing algorithms for speed and efficiency without compromising accuracy.
-
Ethics in AI-Driven Public Services:
- ○
- Transparent decision-making, clear justification of recommendations, and stringent data privacy measures are critical for maintaining user trust and system credibility.
Conclusion
- Improved citizen access to government schemes through personalized recommendations.
- Valuable insights are derived from structured and unstructured data sources.
- Scalability and efficiency make it suitable for wide-scale deployment across diverse populations.
- Integration of Real-Time Data: Incorporate real-time updates on scheme availability and eligibility requirements.
- Behavioral and Psychometric Analysis: Include behavioral insights and psychometric evaluations to better understand user preferences.
- Mobile and Multilingual Accessibility: Develop a mobile-friendly, multilingual interface to increase usability and engagement across diverse user groups.
- Dynamic Learning Mechanisms: Implement adaptive AI algorithms that evolve with user feedback and continuously improve recommendation accuracy.
References
- Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. “Recommender Systems Handbook”, Springer, 2015.
- Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. “Recommender Systems Handbook”, Springer, 2015.
- Burke, R. “Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments”, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2002.
- Aggarwal, C. C. “Recommender Systems: The Textbook”, Springer, 2016.
- Patel, S., & Roy, A. “NLP Techniques for Public Service Recommendations”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023.
- Scikit-learn Documentation: https://scikit-learn.org.
- TensorFlow Tutorials: https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials.
- Government Datasets: https://data.gov.in.
- World Economic Forum. “Technology for Inclusive Growth Report 2023”, WEF Publications.
- LinkedIn Insights. “Emerging Trends in Public Service Delivery”, 2022.
- Success Stories in AI-Based Public Services, https://ai-publicservices-success.com.
- Use of NLP in Government Platforms, IEEE Xplore Digital Library.
- “Public Service Recommender Systems” - Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2021.
- “Machine Learning in Public Services” - A Comprehensive Review, Elsevier Journals, 2022.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
