Submitted:
16 April 2025
Posted:
18 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
1.2. Background of the Study
1.2.1. Self-Identity in the Digital Age
1.2.2. The Role of Influencers and Trendsetters
1.2.3. Physical Comfort and the Reality of Fashion
1.2.4. The Intersection of Fashion, Identity, and Comfort
1.2.5. Cultural and Societal Impacts on Dressing Standards
1.3. Theoretical Framework
1.3.1. The Role of Body Image in Fashion Choices
1.4. Need for the Study:
1.5. Statement of the Problem:
1.6. Aims and Objectives of the Study:
1.6.1. Aims
1.6.2. Objectives of the Study
1.7. Hypotheses:
1.8. Significance of the Study
1.9. Definition of Key Terms
2. Review of Related Literature
2.1. Overview
2.2. Empirical Review
2.3. Synthesis of Literature
2.4. Research Gap
3. Method
3.1. Overview
3.2. Research Design
3.3 Participants
3.4. Sample
3.5. Measures/Instrumentations
-
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Developed by Morris Rosenberg (1965), this 10-item scale assesses global self-worth by measuring both positive and negative feelings about the self. Responses are recorded on a Likert scale, typically ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.” Since self-esteem is a central aspect of self-identity, especially during young adulthood, this scale helps quantify how much an individual’s sense of worth is influenced by external factors such as appearance and fashion norms driven by social media. Participants’ self-esteem levels can reflect how much social validation (e.g., likes, comments) affects their personal identity construction.Measures self-esteem as part of self-identity.Reliability: High internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.80)Validity: Widely validated across diverse populations
-
Self-Concept Clarity Scale (Campbell et al., 1996): This 12-item scale measures the degree to which an individual’s beliefs about themselves are clearly and confidently defined, internally consistent, and stable over time. Respondents rate their agreement on a Likert-type scale. Social media often disrupts one’s consistent sense of self by presenting conflicting fashion ideals and identity cues. The SCCS is especially useful for assessing whether exposure to social media dressing norms causes internal confusion or instability in self-identity.Measures clarity and consistency in self-conceptReliability: Cronbach’s alpha ~0.86Validity: Strong construct validity with self-esteem and identity measures
-
Body Image Satisfaction Scale: This scale evaluates the respondent’s satisfaction with various aspects of their body and appearance, such as weight, shape, and general looks. It typically includes both global and body-part-specific items. Body image is a crucial intermediary between social media dressing standards and self-perception. Dissatisfaction with body image often drives individuals to conform to idealized fashion norms, even at the cost of physical comfort. This scale captures how participants feel about their bodies in light of those trends.Measures satisfaction with physical appearanceReliability: Cronbach’s alpha above 0.80Validity: Correlated well with body dysmorphia and media influence scales
-
Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS): The SAAS is a 16-item instrument that measures the anxiety individuals experience in situations where they fear negative evaluation of their physical appearance by others. This scale reflects the discomfort and stress young adults may feel when dressing in accordance with social media trends that emphasize physical attractiveness. It directly relates to the study’s goal of understanding how fashion driven by social media impacts physical comfort and psychological stress.Measures anxiety experienced in appearance-evaluative situationsReliability: Cronbach’s alpha ~0.94Validity: Proven discriminant and convergent validity in previous studies
3.6. Procedure
3.7. Data Analysis
3.8. Research Ethics
4. Results & Discussion
4.1. Overview
4.2. Presentation of Results and Statistical Findings
| Predictor | B | SE B | t | p | 95% CI |
| Constant | 0.0368 | 0.028 | 1.292 | 0.198 | [-0.019, 0.093] |
| Social Media Dressing Standards | 0.9703 | 0.015 | 65.782 | < .001 | [0.941, 0.999] |
| Variables | r | p |
| Social Media Dressing Standards & Physical Comfort | 0.061 | 0.384 |
4.3. Interpretation of the Findings
5. Summary and Conclusions
5.1. Overview
5.2. Summary of Findings
5.3. Conclusions
5.4. Implications
5.5. Limitations
5.6. Recommendations for Future Research
Appendix A


References
- Chae, J. Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 2017, 17, 898–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, R. , Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. “Selfie”-objectification: The role of selfies in self-objectification and disordered eating in young women. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 79, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
- De Vries, D. A. , & Kühne, R. Facebook and self-perception: Individual susceptibility to negative social comparison on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 86, 217–221. [Google Scholar]
- Hogue, J. V. , & Mills, J. S. The effects of active social media engagement with peers on body image in young women. Body Image, 2019, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Manago, A. M. , Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008, 29, 446–458. [Google Scholar]
- Perloff, R. M. Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 2014, 71, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiggemann, M. , & Slater, A. (). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2014, 47, 630–633. [Google Scholar]
- Vandenbosch, L. , & Eggermont, S. Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 2012, 62, 869–887. [Google Scholar]
- Vartanian, L. R. , & Dey, S. Appearance-related commentary, body dissatisfaction, and dietary restraint in college women: The moderating role of appearance schematicity. Body Image, 2013, 10, 451–456. [Google Scholar]
- Veldhuis, J. , Konijn, E. A., & Seidell, J. C. Weight information on social network sites: The role of media exposure and peer norms in adolescent girls’ weight perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2014, 17, 318–324. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).