Submitted:
04 April 2025
Posted:
04 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Measures
2.4. Intervention
2.5. Focus Group Interview
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Focus Group Interview
3.1.1. “Opportunity to Jump Back in with What We Can Physically Do”
3.1.2. Social Connection and Feeling “Part of Something Bigger”
3.1.3.“. It’s How Our Brain Is Engaged”
3.2. Anthropometry and Functional Outcomes
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ACT | Arm Curl Test |
| BMI | Body Mass Index |
| BST | Back Scratch Test |
| CSRT | Chair Sit and Reach Test |
| CST | 30-sec Chair Stand Test |
| TUG | 8-foot Times Up and Go Test |
| 2MST | 2-minute Step in Place Test |
| 6MWT | 6-minute Walk Test |
References
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2024; Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australians/contents/about (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2021; Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/diverse-groups-of-older-australians/regional-remote-communities (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, Seeman T, Verdes E. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults- present status and future implications. Lancet 2015, 385, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jindai K, Nielson C, Vorderstrasse B, Quiñones A. Multimorbidity and Functional Limitations Among Adults 65 or Older, NHANES 2005–2012. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2016, 13, E151. [Google Scholar]
- Baernholdt, M. , Yan G., Hinton I., Rose K., Mattos M. Quality of life in rural and regional adults 65 years and older: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. J Rural Health 2012, 28, 339–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moore M, Warburton J, O’Halloran P, Shields N, Kingsley M. Effective community-based physical activity interventions for older adults living in rural and regional areas: A systematic review. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2016, 24, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrempft S, Jackowska M. , Hamer M, Steptoe A. Associations between social isolation, loneliness, and objective physical activity in older men and women. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar]
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.001—Australian Health Survey: First Results, 2017–2018. Canberra. 2019. Available online: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4364.0.55.001~2017-18~Main%20Features~Physical%20activity~115 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
- Spiteri K, Broom D, Bekhet AH, de Caro JX, Laventure B, Grafton K. Barriers and Motivators of Physical Activity Participation in Middle-aged and Older-adults - A Systematic Review. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2019, 27, 929–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivaramakrishnan H, Phoenix C, Quested E, et al. "More than just a walk in the park": A multi-stakeholder qualitative exploration of community-based walking sport programmes for middle-aged and older adults. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2023, 15, 772–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cholerton R, Butt J, Quirk H, Breckon J. Differences in older adults walking football initiation and maintenance influences across respondent characteristics: A cross-sectional survey. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2022, 30, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cholerton R, Quirk H, Breckon J, Butt J. Experiences and strategies influencing older adults to continue playing walking football. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2021, 29, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McEwan G, Buchan D, Cowan D, Arthur R, Sanderson M, Macrae E. Recruiting Older Men to Walking Football: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Explore (NY) 2019, 15, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy P, Dias I, Holland C, et al. Walking football as sustainable exercise for older adults – A pilot investigation. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017, 17, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnold J, Bruce-Low S, Sammut L. The impact of 12 weeks walking football on health and fitness in males over 50 years of age. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015, 1, bmjsem–2015. [Google Scholar]
- Capela A, Antunes P, Coelho C, et al. Effects of walking football on adherence, safety, quality of life and physical fitness in patients with prostate cancer: Findings from the PROSTATA_MOVE randomised controlled trial. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1129028. [Google Scholar]
- Lamont E, Harris J, McDonald G, Kerin T, Dickens G. Qualitative investigation of the role of collaborative football and walking football groups in mental health recovery. Ment Health Phys Act. 2017, 12, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corepal R, Zhang J, Grover S, Hubball H, Ashe M. Walking soccer: A systematic review of a modified sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020, 30, 2282–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian Government Department of Health. Modified Monash Model; 2020. Available online: https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/health-workforce/health-workforce-classifications/modified-monash-model#what-is-the-mmm-used-for (accessed on 31 January 2025).
- Norton, K. Standards for anthropometry assessment. In Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology (Norton K and Eston R Eds). London: Routledge; 2018.
- Rikli R and Jones, J. The development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 1999, 7, 129–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liamputtong, P. Focus group methodology: Principle and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2011.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
- Repke M, Ipsen C. Differences in social connectedness and perceived isolation among rural and urban adults with disabilities. Disabil. Health J. 2020, 13, 100829–100829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson L, Rice C, Thompson S. Social participation and loneliness in older adults in a rural Australian context: Individual and organizational perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romein J, Hutchins G, Ottrey E, Talpey S, Bishop J. A community-based modified sport program for rural community-dwelling older adults: A pilot study. Aust J Rural Health 2024, 32, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyons A, Fletcher G, Farmer J, et al. Participation in rural community groups and links with psychological well-being and resilience: A cross-sectional community-based study. BMC Psychol. 2016, 4, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Duncan M, Mowle S, Noon M, et al. The Effect of 12-Weeks Recreational Football (Soccer) for Health Intervention on Functional Movement in Older Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jenkin C, Eime R, Westerbeek H, Van Uffelen, J. Sport for adults aged 50+ years: Participation benefits and barriers. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2018, 26, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Pre | Post | % Change | Cohens d | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass (kg) | 83.9 (69.7-90.2) | 85.4 (71.4-92.1) | 1.7 | 0.07 | 0.011* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.2 (23.5-30.3) | 28.8 (24.1-30.8) | 1.8 | 0.08 | 0.005* |
| CST (reps) | 13.9 (12.7-15.4) | 15.2 (14.3-16.3) | 10.1 | 0.49 | 0.015* |
| ACT (reps) | 19.0 (16.1-22.5) | 21.4 (18.6-24.4) | 10.9 | 0.49 | 0.007* |
| TUG (secs) | 5.7 (5.1-6.1) | 4.9 (4.4-5.2) | 14.0 | -0.9 | 0.001* |
| CSRT (cm) | Right: 1.8 (-1.56-8.9) | Right: 2.1 (-1.4-7.6) | 16.7 | 0.02 | 0.929 |
| Left: 1.8 (-1.1-8.9) | Left: 3.1 (-1.3-8.8) | 72.2 | 0.12 | 0.607 | |
| BST (cm) | Right: -16.4 (-21.5--8.2) | Right: -14.1 (-18.7 --5.3) | 13.4 | 0.19 | 0.176 |
| Left: -19.6 (-24.1--8.37) | Left: -18.4 (-24.9--10.4) | 6.5 | 0.08 | 0.564 | |
| 2MST (reps) | 196.2 (181.1-216.2) | 217.7 (198.9-238.8) | 10.9 | 0.72 | 0.021* |
| 6MWT (m) | 538.3 (510.6-566.1) | 609.3 (571.8-646.8) | 13.2 | 1.6 | 0.002** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).