Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Analysis of Solvability and Representation of General Solutions for Anti-Hermitian Constrained Quaternion Matrix Equations

Submitted:

30 March 2025

Posted:

01 April 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Given the extensive application of anti-Hermitian matrices in engineering and the sciences, this paper presents the general solution to a constrained system of matrix equations that incorporate their anti-Hermitian property. The primary focus of this study is to solve this constrained system of quaternion matrix equations. Solvability conditions are established using rank equalities, and explicit representation formulas are provided, employing the Moore-Penrose inverse of coefficient matrices and their projections. An algorithm and a numerical example are presented to validate the research findings. The numerical example utilizes a unique direct method for obtaining solutions to the given system, based on exclusive determinantal representations of the Moore-Penrose inverse within the noncommutative row-column determinant theory recently developed by one co-author. The results obtained demonstrate significant novelty, even when applied to the corresponding complex matrix equations as a special case.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

We consider the set of matrices with entries that belong to the quaternion skew field determined by H = { t 0 + t 1 i + t 2 j + t 3 k i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = ijk = 1 , t 0 , t 1 , t 2 , t 3 R } . For an arbitrary quaternion t = t 0 + t 1 i + t 2 j + t 3 k H , its conjugate quaternion is defined by t ¯ = t 0 t 1 i t 2 j t 3 k . C and R represent the complex and real number field, respectively. For any A H m × n , the matrix A * H n × m indicates the conjugate transpose of matrix A. A matrix A H n × n is said to be Hermitian when A * = A , and it is anti-Hermitian when A * = A . Sometimes, instead of referring to "anti-Hermitian," the term "skew-Hermitian" is used, especially when describing quaternion matrices. Note that for any A H m × n , the sum of it and its conjugate transpose A ˇ : = 1 2 ( A + A * ) is Hermitian, and their difference
A ^ : = 1 2 ( A A * ) = A ^ * ,
yields its corresponding skew-Hermitian matrix, and A = A ˇ + A ^ holds.
Both symbols r ( A ) and rank A denote the rank of A. I denotes an identity matrix with suitable shape. The Moore-Penrose inverse (MPI) of A H m × n is denoted by W : = A H n × m and is defined by the four Penrose’s equations
( 1 ) A W A = A , ( 2 ) W A W = W , ( 3 ) ( A W ) * = A W , ( 4 ) ( W A ) * = W A .
Furthermore, L A = I A A and R A = I A A are pair of projectors produced by A, and
L A = ( L A ) * = ( L A ) 2 = L A , R A = ( R A ) 2 = ( R A ) * = R A , L A * = R A , R A * = L A .
The introduction of quaternionic mathematics has significantly expanded the scope of applied mathematical fields [1,2,3,4]. Quaternions are fundamental in the description of three-dimensional rotations and find widespread application in computer graphics, robotics, navigation, quantum physics, mechanics, and signal processing, as extensively documented in [5]. Recent advancements in the development of explicit formulas and determinantal representations for quaternion matrix equations have enabled novel approaches to solving both classical and quaternion systems [6,7,8,9,10]. The increasing interest among scientists in the application of quaternions across diverse practical domains has spurred the investigation of anti-Hermitian solutions for quaternion systems of matrix equations.
Numerous problems in various engineering disciplines, including linear descriptor systems, system design, singular system control [11,12,13], perturbation theory [14], and feedback control [15], necessitate the solution of Sylvester-type matrix equations. For example, Bai [16] examined the iterative solution of A 1 X + X A 2 = B . Roth [17] established the consistency condition for the existence of solutions to A 1 X + Y A 2 = B , and researchers in [18] derived its general solution.
Recently, the general solution of
A 1 X + Y B 1 = C 1 , A 2 Z + Y B 2 = C 2 ,
was explored in [19]. In [20], some solvability conditions to (2)are also researched. The condition number of (2) was also evaluated in [21]. The constraint solution to (2) are explored by Wang et al. [22]. Some practical necessary and sufficient conditions for
A 1 X 1 + Z 1 B 1 = C 1 , A 2 Z 1 + X 2 B 2 = C 2 ,
to have a general solution are presented by Wang and He in [23].
The generalized Sylvester matrix equation
A X B + C Y D = E ,
has been extensively studied. Baksalari and Kala [24] provided a comprehensive solution to the complex equation (3) employing the Moore-Penrose inverse. This result later extended and developed to quaternion equations by Wang [25,26].
Liu evaluated the Hermitian solutions to Sylvester-type equation
A 1 X A 1 * + B 1 Y B 1 * = C 1
over C in [27]. Additionally, [28] investigated equation (4) in its findings. A nonlinear Hermitian expression was also explored in [31]. Kyrchei, in [29,30], utilized the established theory of row-column noncommutative determinants to provide Cramer’s rules for the solution to equation (3) and Hermitian solution of equation (4) within the quaternion skew field H . More recently, Hajarian, in [32], developed an algorithm for determining the solution to the system of the generalized Sylvester matrix equations
A 1 X B 1 + C 1 Y D 1 = E 1 , A 2 Z B 2 + C 2 Y D 2 = E 2 .
Some latest development to the general solution of Sylvester-type matrix equations can be found in [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Some iterative algorithms of solving coupled matrix equations can be found in [41,42].
Very recently, researchers in [43] examined the general solution of
A 1 U A 1 * + B 1 V B 1 * = C 1 , C 1 = C 1 * A 2 W A 2 * + B 2 V B 2 * = C 2 , C 2 = C 2 * ,
with some practical necessary and sufficient conditions when this system is consistent.
Driven by the aforementioned research and the substantial applicability of generalized Sylvester matrix equations across diverse applied fields, this paper investigates the constrained anti-Hermitian Sylvester matrix equations:
A 3 X = C 3 , X B 3 = C 4 , X * = X , A 4 Y = C 5 , Y B 4 = C 6 , Y * = Y , A 5 Z = C 7 , Z B 5 = C 8 , Z * = Z , A 1 X A 1 * + B 1 Y B 1 * = C 1 , C 1 = C 1 * A 2 Z A 2 * + B 2 Y B 2 * = C 2 , C 2 = C 2 * ,
over the quaternion skew field H . We will establish the anti-Hermitian solution to the system (6) using the Moore-Penrose inverse and provide an algorithm for its determination, employing determinantal representations of the Moore-Penrose inverse as developed in [44]. The results pertaining to system (6) will significantly broaden the application of anti-Hermitian Sylvester matrix equations in various domains. The primary objective of this paper is to compute the general solution of (6) when it is solvable. The general solution of:
A 4 X ( A 4 X ) * + B 4 Y B 4 * + C 4 Z C 4 * = D 4 , D 4 = D 4 * , Y = Y * , Z = Z * ,
plays a fundamental role in deriving the main findings of this paper over H with anti-Hermitian properties.
Recent research has highlighted the growing interest in Sylvester-type matrix equations for dual quaternions, which extend Hamilton quaternions (see, e.g., [45]). Notably, the synergistic relationship between different quaternion algebras facilitates valuable insights, especially in the development of techniques for solving matrix equations.
This paper is structured into four sections. Section 2 establishes the general solution of (6), including a special case. Section 3 presents an algorithm and a numerical example for the anti-Hermitian solution of (6). Finally, Section 4 provides a conclusion to this research.

2. General solution and solvability condition of (6)

Some significant results are given at the outset of this section which have eminent function in constructing the main result of this paper.
Lemma 1
([46]). Let K C m × n , P C m × t , Q C l × n . Then
r K Q r ( K ) = r ( Q L K ) , r K P r ( P ) = r ( R P K ) , r K P Q 0 r ( P ) r ( Q ) = r ( R P K L Q ) .
Lemma 2.
[47]. Let A 2 , B 2 , C 2 and D 2 be given with conformable dimensions over H . Set
E = A 2 B 2 * , F = C 2 D 2 * .
Then the system A 2 Y = C 2 , Y B 2 = D 2 has the skew-Hermitian solution if and only if R E F = 0 and E F * = F E * . Under these terms, its general skew-Hermitian solution is
Y = E F ( E F ) * + E E ( E F ) * + L E V L E * ,
where V = V * is a free matrix over H with conformable size.
Lemma 3.
[6]. Let A 4 , B 4 , C 4 and D 4 = D 4 * , be known coefficient matrices in (7) over C with agreeable sizes. Assume
A = R A 4 B 4 , B = R A 4 C 4 , C = R A 4 D 4 R A 4 , M = R A B , S = B L M .
Then the conditions given below are alike:
(1)
The system (7) has a solution ( X , Y , Z ) , where Y and Z are anti-Hermitian matrices.
(2)
The coefficient matrices in (7) satisfy:
R M R A C = 0 , R A C R B = 0 .
(3)
r D 4 A 4 B 4 C 4 A 4 * 0 0 0 = r A 4 B 4 C 4 + r ( A 4 ) , r D 4 A 4 B 4 A 4 * 0 0 C 4 * 0 0 = r A 4 B 4 + r A 4 C 4 .
Under these conditions, X , Y * = Y and Z * = Z are given below
X = A 4 [ D 4 B 4 Y B 4 * C 4 Z C 4 * ] 1 2 A 4 [ D 4 B 4 Y B 4 * C 4 Z C 4 * ] ( A 4 ) * A 4 * U 2 * ( A 4 ) * A 4 * A 4 U 2 A 4 * + L A 4 U 1 , Y = Y * = A C ( A ) * 1 2 ( A B M C [ I + ( B ) * S * ] ( A ) * A [ I + S B ] C ( M ) * B * ( A ) * ) A S U 6 S * ( A ) * + L A U 4 U 4 * L A , Z = Z * = 1 2 M C ( B ) * [ I + ( S S ) * ] 1 2 ( I + S S ) B C ( M ) * + L M U 6 L M + + U 5 L B L B U 5 * + L M L S U 3 ( L M L S U 3 ) * ,
where U 1 , , U 5 and U 6 = U 6 * are free matrices with acceptable dimensions.
Lemma 3 has solid role in obtaining the main theorem of this paper. Now we present the main result of this paper.
Theorem 1.
Let A i H m × n , B i H m × q for all i = 1 , , 5 , C i H m × k for all i = 3 , , 8 , and C i = C i * H m × m for i = 1 , 2 . Assign the following
A 6 = A 3 B 3 * , C 9 = C 3 C 4 * , A 7 = A 4 B 4 * , C 10 = C 5 C 6 * , A 8 = A 5 B 5 * , C 11 = C 7 C 8 * , A 9 = A 1 L A 6 , B 9 = B 1 L A 7 , C 12 = C 1 A 1 X 01 A 1 * B 1 Y 01 B 1 * , X 01 = A 6 C 9 ( A 6 C 9 ) * + A 6 A 6 ( A 6 C 9 ) * , Y 01 = A 7 C 10 ( A 7 C 10 ) * + A 7 A 7 ( A 7 C 10 ) * , M 1 = R A 9 B 9 , S 1 = B 9 L M 1 , A 10 = A 2 L A 8 , B 10 = B 2 L A 7 , C 13 = C 2 A 2 Z 01 A 2 * B 2 Y 01 B 2 * , Z 01 = A 8 C 11 ( A 8 C 11 ) * + A 8 A 8 ( A 8 C 11 ) * , M 2 = R A 10 B 10 , S 2 = B 10 L M 2 , D 1 = L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 , E 1 = L M 1 , F 1 = L M 2 , G 1 = V 02 V 01 , V 02 = 1 2 M 2 C 13 ( B 10 ) * ( I + S 2 S 2 ) 1 2 ( I + S 2 S 2 ) B 10 C 13 ( M 2 ) * , V 01 = 1 2 M 1 C 12 ( B 9 ) * ( I + S 1 S 1 ) 1 2 ( I + S 1 S 1 ) B 9 C 12 ( M 1 ) * , D 2 = R D 1 E 1 , E 2 = R D 1 F 1 , G 2 = R D 1 G 1 R D 1 , M 3 = R D 2 E 2 , S 3 = E 2 L M 3 .
Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1)
System (5) is consistent.
(2)
The equalities given below are satisfied:
R A 6 C 9 = 0 , A 6 C 9 * = C 9 A 6 * , R A 7 C 10 = 0 , A 7 C 10 * = C 10 A 7 * , R A 8 C 11 = 0 , A 8 C 11 * = C 11 A 8 * , R A 9 C 12 R B 9 = 0 , R M 1 R A 9 C 12 = 0 , R A 10 C 13 R B 10 = 0 , R M 2 R A 10 C 13 = 0 , R D 2 G 2 R D 2 = 0 , R M 3 R D 2 G 2 = 0 .
(3)
The following rank equalities hold:
r C 9 A 6 = r ( A 6 ) , A 6 C 9 * = C 9 A 6 * , r C 10 A 7 = r ( A 7 ) , A 7 C 10 * = C 10 A 7 * , r C 11 A 8 = r ( A 8 ) , A 8 C 11 * = C 11 A 8 * ,
r C 1 A 1 B 1 C 10 * B 1 * 0 A 7 * C 9 A 1 * A 6 0 = r A 1 A 6 + r B 1 A 7 , r C 1 B 1 A 1 C 10 B 1 * A 7 0 C 9 A 1 * 0 A 6 = r A 1 B 1 0 A 7 A 6 0 , r C 2 A 2 B 2 C 10 * B 2 * 0 A 7 * C 11 A 2 * A 8 0 = r A 2 A 8 + r B 2 A 7 , r C 2 B 2 A 2 C 10 B 2 * A 7 0 C 11 A 2 * 0 A 8 = r A 2 B 2 A 8 0 0 A 7 ,
r 0 0 B 2 * 0 B 1 * 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * B 1 * 0 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * B 2 * 0 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 B 2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 * B 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = r B 1 B 1 B 1 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 A 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 2 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 + r B 1 B 1 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 B 2 A 2 0 0 0 0 A 1 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 A 6 ,
r 0 0 B 1 * B 2 * 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 B 1 * 0 B 2 * 0 0 0 A 7 * B 2 B 2 0 0 0 A 2 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 1 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 = r B 2 0 0 A 2 0 0 B 1 0 0 A 1 B 1 B 1 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 + r 0 B 1 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 A 1 0 B 2 0 0 A 2 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 0 0 A 8 .
Under these conditions, the general solution to (5) is
X = A 6 C 9 ( A 6 C 9 ) * + A 6 A 6 ( A 6 C 9 ) * + L A 6 U L A 6 * , Y = A 7 C 10 ( A 7 C 10 ) * + A 7 A 7 ( A 7 C 10 ) * + L A 7 V L A 7 * , Z = A 8 C 11 ( A 8 C 11 ) * + A 8 A 8 ( A 8 C 11 ) * + L A 8 W L A 8 * ,
where
U = A 9 C 12 ( A 9 ) * 1 2 A 9 B 9 M 1 C 12 [ I + ( B 9 ) * S 1 * ] ( A 9 ) * + 1 2 A 1 [ I + S 1 B 9 ] C 12 ( M 1 ) * B 9 * ( A 9 ) * A 9 S 1 U 1 S 1 * ( A 9 ) * + L A 9 U 2 U 2 * L A 9 , W = A 10 C 13 ( A 10 ) * 1 2 A 10 B 10 M 2 C 13 [ I + ( B 10 ) * S 2 * ] ( A 10 ) * + 1 2 A 10 [ I + S 2 B 10 ] C 13 M 2 * B 10 * ( A 10 ) * A 10 S 2 W 1 S 2 * ( A 10 ) * + L A 10 W 2 W 2 * L A 10 ,
and the matrix V can be found in two different ways
V = 1 2 M 1 C 12 ( B 9 ) * ( I + S 1 S 1 ) 1 2 ( I + S 1 S 1 ) B 9 C 12 ( M 1 ) * + L M 1 U 1 L M 1 + L M 1 L S 1 V 1 V 1 * L S 1 L M 1 + V 2 L B 9 L B 9 V 2 * , V = 1 2 M 2 C 13 ( B 10 ) * ( I + S 2 S 2 ) 1 2 ( I + S 2 S 2 ) B 10 C 13 ( M 2 ) * + L M 2 W 1 L M 2 + L M 2 L S 2 V 3 V 3 * L S 2 L M 2 + V 4 L B 10 L B 10 V 4 * .
Here the matrix V 1 , V 2 , V 3 , V 4 , U 1 , and W 1 are determined by the following. Let
T 1 * = V 1 * V 2 V 3 * V 4 .
Then,
T 1 = D 1 ( G 1 E 1 U 1 E 1 * F 1 T 2 F 1 * ) 1 2 D 1 ( G 1 E 1 U 1 E 1 * F 1 T 2 F 1 * ) ( D 1 ) * D 1 * D 1 T 4 D 1 * T 4 * ( D 1 ) * D 1 * + L D 1 T 6 U 1 = D 2 G 2 ( D 2 ) * 1 2 D 2 E 2 M 3 G 2 ( I + ( E 2 ) * S 3 * ) ( D 2 ) * + 1 2 D 2 ( I + S 3 E 2 ) G 2 ( M 3 ) * E 2 * ( D 2 ) * D 2 S 3 U 3 ( D 2 S 3 ) * + L D 2 U 4 U 4 * L D 2 , T 2 = W 1 = 1 2 M 3 G 2 ( E 2 ) * ( I + S 3 S 3 ) H 1 2 ( I + S 3 S 3 ) E 2 G 2 * ( M 3 ) * + L M 3 U 3 L M 3 + L M 3 L S 3 T 3 T 3 * L S 3 L M 3 + T 4 L E 2 L E 2 T 4 * ,
where U 2 , W 2 , T 3 , T 4 , and T 6 = T 6 * are any matrices of acceptable shapes over H .
Proof. 
We write the equations in (6) as follows:
A 3 X = C 3 , X B 3 = C 4 , X * = X , A 4 Y = C 5 , Y B 4 = C 6 , Y * = Y , A 1 X A 1 * + B 1 Y B 1 * = C 1 , C 1 = C 1 *
and
A 4 Y = C 5 , Y B 4 = C 6 , Y * = Y , A 5 Z = C 7 , Z B 5 = C 8 , Z * = Z , A 2 Z A 2 * + B 2 Y B 2 * = C 2 , C 2 = C 2 * .
According to Lemma 2, the general solution to A 3 X = C 3 , X B 3 = C 4 , X * = X , and A 4 Y = C 5 , Y B 4 = C 6 , Y * = Y is given by
X = A 6 C 9 ( A 6 C 9 ) * + A 6 A 6 ( A 6 C 9 ) * + L A 6 U L A 6 * ,
Y = A 7 C 10 ( A 7 C 10 ) * + A 7 A 7 ( A 7 C 10 ) * + L A 7 V L A 7 *
respectively. Using (20) and (21) in the last equation of (18) and making some calculation, we obtain
A 9 U A 9 * + B 9 V B 9 * = C 12 .
Equation (22) is consistent if and only if
R A 9 C 12 R B 9 = 0 , R M 1 R A 9 C 12 = 0 .
In this case, the general solution to (22) can be written as
U = A 9 C 12 ( A 9 ) * 1 2 A 9 B 9 M 1 C 12 [ I + ( B 9 ) * S 1 * ] ( A 9 ) * 1 2 A 9 [ I + S 1 B 9 ] C 12 ( M 1 ) * B 9 * ( A 9 ) * A 9 S 1 U 1 S 1 * ( A 9 ) * + L A 9 U 2 U 2 * L A 9 , V = 1 2 M 1 C 12 ( B 9 ) * ( I + S 1 S 1 ) + 1 2 ( I + S 1 S 1 ) B 9 C 12 ( M 1 ) * + L M 1 U 1 L M 1 + L M 1 L S 1 V 1 V 1 * L S 1 L M 1 + V 2 L B 9 L B 9 V 2 * .
Applying Lemma 2 to the system A 5 Z = C 7 , Z B 5 = C 8 , Y * = Y gives
Z = A 8 C 11 ( A 8 C 11 ) * + A 8 A 8 ( A 8 C 11 ) * + L A 8 W L A 8 * .
Using (21) and (24) in the last equation of (19) and making some calculation, we gain
A 10 W A 10 * + B 10 V B 10 * = C 13 .
Equation (25) is solvable if and only if
R A 10 C 13 R B 10 = 0 , R M 2 R A 10 C 13 = 0 .
By Lemma 3 and taking into account equation (1), from this condition it follows that the general solution to (25) can be expressed as
W = A 10 C 13 ( A 10 ) * 1 2 A 10 B 10 M 2 C 13 [ I + ( B 10 ) * S 2 * ] ( A 10 ) * + 1 2 A 10 [ I + S 2 B 10 ] C 13 ( M 2 * B 2 * ( A 10 ) * A 10 S 2 W 1 S 2 * ( A 10 ) * + L A 10 W 2 W 2 * L A 10 , V = 1 2 M 2 C 13 ( B 10 ) * ( I + S 2 S 2 ) 1 2 ( I + S 2 S 2 ) B 10 C 13 ( M 2 ) * + L M 2 W 1 L M 2 + L M 2 L S 2 V 3 V 3 * L S 2 L M 2 + V 4 L B 10 L B 10 V 4 * ,
where W 2 a free matrix of adequate shapes over H . The matrices U 1 , W 1 , V 1 , V 2 , V 3 , V 4 are determined as follows.
Denote T 1 * = V 1 * V 2 V 3 * V 4 , E 1 = L M 1 , F 1 = L M 2 , T 2 = W 1 , G 1 = V 02 V 01 . Equating (23) and (26), we obtain
D 1 T 1 ( D 1 T 1 ) * + E 1 U 1 E 1 * + F 1 T 2 F 1 * = G 1 .
By Lemma 3, equation (27) has a solution if and only if the equalities in (9) are satisfied and in this case its general solution can be expressed by (14)-(17).
( 2 ) ( 3 ) : From Lemma 3, we have
r ( R A 6 C 9 ) = 0 r C 9 A 6 = r ( A 6 ) , A 6 C 9 * = C 9 A 6 * , r ( R A 7 C 10 ) = 0 r C 10 A 7 = r ( A 7 ) , A 7 C 10 * = C 10 A 7 * , r ( R A 8 C 11 ) = 0 r C 11 A 8 = r ( A 8 ) , A 8 C 11 * = C 11 A 8 * , r ( R A 9 C 12 B 9 ) = 0 r C 12 A 9 B 9 * 0 = r ( A 9 ) + r ( B 9 ) r C 1 A 1 X 01 A 1 * B 1 Y 01 B 1 * A 1 L A 6 L A 7 B 1 * 0 = r ( A 1 L A 6 ) + r ( L A 7 B 1 * ) , r C 1 A 1 X 01 A 1 * B 1 Y 01 B 1 * A 1 0 B 1 * 0 A 7 * 0 A 6 0 = r A 1 A 6 + r B 1 A 7 , r C 1 A 1 B 1 C 10 * B 1 * 0 A 7 * C 9 A 1 * A 6 0 = r A 1 A 6 + r B 1 A 7 , r ( R M 1 R A 9 C 12 ) = 0 r R A 9 C 12 M 1 = r ( M 1 ) r R A 9 C 12 R A 9 B 9 = r ( R A 9 B 9 ) , r C 12 B 9 A 9 = r A 9 B 9 r [ C 1 A 1 X 01 A 1 * B 1 Y 01 B 1 * B 1 L A 7 A 1 L A 6 ] = r B 1 L A 7 A 1 L A 6 r C 1 A 1 X 01 A 1 * B 1 Y 01 B 1 * B 1 A 1 0 A 7 0 0 0 A 6 = r B 1 A 1 A 7 0 0 A 6 r C 1 B 1 A 1 C 10 A 7 0 C 9 A 1 * 0 A 6 = r B 1 A 1 A 7 0 0 A 6 , r ( R A 10 C 13 B 10 ) = 0 r C 13 A 10 B 10 * 0 = r ( A 10 ) + r ( B 10 ) r C 2 A 2 Z 01 A 2 * B 2 Y 01 B 2 * A 2 L A 8 L A 7 B 2 * 0 = r ( A 2 L A 8 ) + r ( L A 7 B 2 * ) r C 2 A 2 Z 01 A 2 * B 2 Y 01 B 2 * A 2 0 B 2 * 0 A 7 * 0 A 8 0 = r A 2 A 8 + r B 2 A 7 r C 2 A 2 B 2 C 10 * B 2 * 0 A 7 * C 11 A 1 * A 8 0 = r A 2 A 8 + r B 2 A 7 , r ( R M 2 R A 10 C 13 ) = 0 r R A 10 C 13 M 2 = r ( M 1 ) r R A 10 C 13 R A 10 B 10 = r ( R A 10 B 10 ) r C 13 B 10 A 10 = r A 10 B 10 r C 2 A 2 Z 01 A 2 * B 2 Y 01 B 2 * B 2 L A 7 A 2 L A 8 ] = r B 2 L A 7 A 2 L A 8 r C 2 A 2 Z 01 A 2 * B 2 Y 01 B 2 * B 2 A 2 0 A 7 0 0 0 A 8 = r A 2 B 2 A 8 0 0 A 7 r C 2 B 2 A 2 C 10 B 2 * A 7 0 C 11 A 2 * 0 A 8 = r A 2 B 2 A 8 0 0 A 7 , R D 2 G 2 R D 2 * = 0 r G 2 D 2 D 2 * 0 = r ( D 2 ) + r ( E 2 ) , r R D 1 G 1 R D 1 * R D 1 E 1 F 1 * R D 1 0 = r ( R D 1 E 1 ) + r ( R D 1 F 1 ) r G 1 E 1 D 1 F 1 * 0 0 D 1 * 0 0 = r [ D 1 E 1 + r D 1 F 1 r v 02 v 01 L M 1 L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 L S 1 L M 1 0 0 0 0 0 L B 9 0 0 0 0 0 L S 2 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 L B 10 0 0 0 0 0 = r L M 1 L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 + r L M 2 L S 1 L M 1 L B 9 L S 2 L M 2 L B 10 r v 02 v 01 L M 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 L M 2 0 0 0 0 L S 1 L M 1 0 0 0 0 L B 9 0 0 0 0 L B 10 0 0 0 0 = r I L M 2 I I B 9 0 0 0 0 S 2 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 M 1 + r L M 1 I I I S 1 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 M 2 r v 01 v 02 I I L M 2 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 M 2 * 0 0 0 L M 1 0 0 0 0 0 S 1 * 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 2 * 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 = r I L M 2 I I B 9 0 0 0 0 B 1 L M 10 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 R A 9 B 9 + r L M 1 I I I B 9 L M 1 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 R A 10 B 10 r 0 0 B 10 * 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 * B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 B 10 * 0 0 0 0 B 10 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 * 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 C 13 0 0 0 A 10 0 0 B 9 0 C 12 * 0 0 0 A 9 = r B 9 B 9 B 9 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 A 9 0 B 10 0 0 0 A 10 + r B 9 B 9 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 B 10 A 10 0 0 0 0 A 9
r 0 0 B 2 * 0 B 1 * 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * B 1 * 0 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * B 2 * 0 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 B 2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 * B 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = r B 1 B 1 B 1 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 A 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 2 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 + r B 1 B 1 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 B 2 A 2 0 0 0 0 A 1 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 A 6 , r ( R M 3 R D 2 G 2 ] = 0 r R D 2 G 2 M 3 = r ( M 3 ) r R D 2 G 2 R D 2 E 2 = r ( M 3 ) r G 2 E 2 D 2 = r D 2 E 2 r R D 1 G 1 R D 1 * R D 1 F 1 R D 1 E 1 = r F 1 D 1 E 1 + r ( D 1 ) r v 02 v 01 L M 2 L M 1 L M 1 L S 1 L B 4 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 L S 1 L M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 L B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 L S 2 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 L B 10 0 0 0 0 0 = r L M 2 L M 1 L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 + r L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 r v 02 v 01 I I I L M 2 I 0 0 0 0 L M 1 0 0 0 0 0 S 1 * 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 * 0 0 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 2 * 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 * 0 M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 = r L M 2 L M 1 L B 9 L B 10 + r L M 1 L S 1 L B 9 L M 2 L S 2 L B 10 r v 02 v 01 I I I L M 2 I 0 0 0 0 L M 1 0 0 0 0 0 L M 1 B 9 * 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 * 0 0 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L M 2 B 10 * 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 * 0 R A 10 B 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R A 9 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 L M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 = r I I I I M 2 0 0 0 0 M 1 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 B 10 + r L M 1 I L M 2 I S 1 0 0 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 S 2 0 0 0 0 B 10
Expanding the above equations and using
A 9 U 01 A 9 * + B 9 V 01 B 9 * = C 12 A 10 W 01 A 10 * + B 10 V 02 B 10 * = C 13
and doing some simplifications in it, we have
r 0 0 B 9 * B 10 * 0 0 0 0 0 B 9 * 0 B 10 * 0 0 B 10 B 10 0 0 0 A 10 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 A 9 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 0 = r B 10 0 0 A 10 0 0 B 9 0 0 A 9 B 9 B 9 B 9 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 + r 0 B 9 0 0 B 9 0 0 0 0 B 10 0 0 0 0 A 9 0 B 10 0 0 A 10 r 0 0 L A 7 B 1 * L A 7 B 2 * 0 0 0 0 0 L A 7 B 1 * 0 L A 7 B 2 * 0 0 B 10 B 10 0 0 0 A 2 L A 8 0 L A 7 B 1 * 0 0 0 0 0 A 1 L A 6 0 L A 7 B 1 * 0 0 0 0 0 = r B 2 L A 7 0 0 A 2 L A 8 0 0 B 1 L A 7 0 0 A 9 B 1 L A 7 B 1 L A 7 B 1 L A 7 0 0 0 0 B 2 L A 7 0 0 + r 0 B 1 L A 7 0 0 B 1 L A 7 0 0 0 0 B 2 L A 7 0 0 0 0 A 1 L A 6 0 B 2 L A 7 0 0 A 2 L A 8 r 0 0 B 1 * B 2 * 0 0 0 A 7 * 0 0 0 B 1 * 0 B 2 * 0 0 0 A 7 * B 2 B 2 0 0 0 A 2 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 1 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 = r B 2 0 0 A 2 0 0 B 1 0 0 A 1 B 1 B 1 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 0 A 8 0 0 0 0 0 A 6 + r 0 B 1 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 A 1 0 B 2 0 0 A 2 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 7 0 0 0 0 A 6 0 0 0 0 A 8 .
can be proven similar to the above.    □
Now we discuss a particular case of our system.
If A 3 , A 4 , A 5 , B 3 , B 4 , B 5 , C 3 , C 4 , C 5 , C 6 , C 7 and C 8 are all equal to zero in Theorem 1, then we get the following consequence.
Corollary 1.
Let A 1 C m × n , A 2 C m × q , B i C m × k , and C i = C i * C m × m for i = 1 , 2 . Assign
M 1 = R A 1 B 1 , S 1 = B 1 L M 1 , M 2 = R A 2 B 2 , S 2 = B 2 L M 2 , A 4 = R A 3 L M 1 , B 4 = R A 3 L M 2 , A 3 = L B 2 * L B 1 L M 1 L S 1 L M 2 L S 2 , M 3 = R A 4 B 4 , S 3 = B 4 L M 3 C 3 = V 02 V 01 , V 02 = 1 2 M 2 C 2 ( B 2 ) * ( I + S 2 S 2 ) 1 2 ( I + S 2 S 2 ) B 2 C 2 ( M 2 ) * , V 01 = 1 2 M 1 C 1 ( B 1 ) * ( I + S 1 S 1 ) 1 2 ( I + S 1 S 1 ) B 1 C 1 ( M 1 ) * , C 4 = R A 3 C 3 R A 3 .
Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1)
System (5) is consistent.
(2)
The following equalities hold:
R A 1 C 1 R B 1 = 0 , R M 1 R A 1 C 1 = 0 , R A 2 C 2 R B 2 = 0 , R M 2 R A 2 C 2 = 0 , R A 4 C 4 R B 4 = 0 , R M 3 R A 4 C 4 = 0 .
(3)
The following rank equalities hold:
r C 1 A 1 B 1 * 0 = r ( A 1 ) + r ( B 1 ) , r C 1 B 1 A 1 = r A 1 B 1 , r C 2 A 2 B 2 * 0 = r ( A 2 ) + r ( B 2 ) , r C 2 B 2 A 2 = r A 2 B 2 , r 0 0 0 B 2 * B 1 0 0 0 0 0 B 2 * 0 B 1 * 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 C 1 A 1 0 B 2 0 C 2 0 0 0 B 2 B 2 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 2 * 0 0 0 = r B 1 0 B 1 A 1 B 2 B 2 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 + r B 2 0 0 A 2 B 2 B 2 B 2 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 1 0 , r 0 0 B 1 * B 2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * 0 B 1 * 0 0 0 0 0 B 1 * 0 0 B 2 * 0 0 B 1 * B 1 * 0 0 C 1 0 A 1 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 C 2 A 2 0 0 B 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 = r B 1 0 B 1 A 1 B 2 B 2 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 0 B 2 0 + B 2 0 B 1 0 0 B 2 + r ( B 1 ) .
Under these conditions, the general solution to (5) is
X = A 1 C 1 ( A 1 ) * 1 2 A 1 B 1 M 1 C 1 [ I + ( B 1 ) * S 1 * ] ( A 1 ) * + 1 2 A 1 [ I + S 1 B 1 ] C 1 ( M 1 ) * B 1 * ( A 1 ) * A 1 S 1 U 1 S 1 * ( A 1 ) * + L A 1 V 1 V 1 * L A 1 , Z = A 2 C 2 ( A 2 ) * 1 2 A 2 B 2 M 2 C 2 [ I + ( B 2 ) * S 2 * ] ( A 2 ) * + 1 2 A 2 [ I + S 2 B 2 ] C 2 ( M 2 ) * B 2 * ( A 2 ) * A 2 S 2 U 4 S 2 * ( A 2 ) * + L A 2 V 2 V 2 * L A 2 , Y = 1 2 M 1 C 1 ( B 1 ) * ( I + S 1 S 1 ) 1 2 ( I + S 1 S 1 ) B 1 C 1 ( M 1 ) * + L M 1 U 1 L M 1 + L M 1 L S 1 U 2 U 2 * L S 1 L M 1 + U 3 L B 1 L B 1 U 3 * ,
or
Y = 1 2 M 2 C 2 ( B 2 ) * ( I + S 2 S 2 ) 1 2 ( I + S 2 S 2 ) B 2 C 2 ( M 2 ) * + L M 2 U 4 L M 2 + L M 2 L S 2 U 5 U 5 * L S 2 L M 2 + U 6 L B 2 L B 2 U 6 * ,
with
U 6 * = [ I k 0 0 0 ] Z , U 3 * = [ 0 I k 0 0 ] Z , U 2 = [ 0 0 I k 0 ] Z , U 5 = [ 0 0 0 I k ] Z ,
where
Z = A 3 ( C 3 L M 1 U 1 L M 1 L M 2 U 4 L M 2 ) 1 2 A 3 ( C 3 L M 1 U 1 L M 1 L M 2 U 4 L M 2 ) A 3 A 3 A 3 U 7 A 3 * U 7 * A 3 A 3 + L A 3 U 8 U 1 = A 4 C 4 ( A 4 ) * 1 2 A 4 B 4 M 3 C 4 ( I + ( B 4 ) * S 3 * ) ( A 4 ) * + 1 2 A 4 ( I + S 3 B 4 ) C 4 ( M 3 ) * B 4 * ( A 4 ) * A 4 S 3 U 9 ( A 4 S 3 ) * + L A 4 U 10 U 10 * L A 4 , U 4 = 1 2 M 3 C 4 ( B 4 ) * ( I + S 3 S 3 ) 1 2 ( I + S 3 S 3 ) B 4 C 4 ( M 3 ) * + L M 3 U 11 L M 3 + L M 3 L S 3 U 12 U 12 * L S 3 L M 3 + U 13 L B 4 L B 4 U 13 * ,
where   V 1 , V 2 , U 7 , , U 13 , U 9 = U 9 * , U 11 = U 11 * are any matrices of acceptable shapes over H .

3. An algorithm and an example

Following the principles outlined in Theorem 1, we have developed an algorithm for explicitly solving th equations stated in (5). This algorithm makes practical use of MPI representations to construct general solutions, effectively connecting theoretical principles with practical application.
To gain a clearer understanding of the computational aspects of our method, we will refer to a lemma from [44] that provides a method for representing the MPI, an essential component in the solution process.
Lemma 4.
[44][Theorem 4.5] Let A H m × n with rank ( A ) = r . Then, the MPI A = ( a i j ) H n × m can be expressed through the representations stated as
a i j = β J r , n i cdet i A * A . i a . j * β β β J r , n A * A β β = α I r , m j rdet j ( A A * ) j . ( a i . * ) α α α I r , m A A * α α ,
where cdet i A and rdet i A denote the column and row determinants of A H m × m , taken along its i-th column and row, respectively. Furthermore, A α α and A β β represent principal submatrices of A, while | A | α α and | A | β β signify principal minors in the sense of row-column determinants when A is Hermitian.
The rows and columns of these submatrices and minors are indexed by α : = { α 1 , , α r } { 1 , , m } and β : = { β 1 , , β r } { 1 , , n } , where I r , m : = { α : 1 α 1 < < α r m } and J r , n : = { β : 1 β 1 < < β r n } . Additionally, a . j * and a i . * refer to the j-th column and the i-th row of A * , respectively. The matrices A i . ( b ) and A . j ( c ) are obtained by replacing the i-th row and j-th column of A with the row vector b H 1 × n and the column vector c H m , respectively.
To find the MPI for any complex matrix by determinantal representations similar to those obtained in Lemma 4, it is enough to change row-column quaternion determinants to an ordinary determinant. Hence, it holds the next.
Lemma 5.
[48][Theorem 2.2] Let A C m × n with rank ( A ) = r . Then, the MPI A = ( a i j ) C n × m can be expressed through the representations stated as
a i j = β J r , n i A * A . i a . j * β β β J r , n A * A β β = α I r , m j ( A A * ) j . ( a i . * ) α α α I r , m A A * α α .
Now, we proceed to detail our algorithm for solving the quaternion matrix equations.
Algorithm 1:Finding solutions for the given system
1.
Input the matrices A i , B i for i = 1 , , 5 ; C i for i = 1 , , 8 . Ensure they have conformable dimensions over H , and some of them are skew-Hermitian.
2.
Compute the requisite matrices as prescribed in (8).
3.
Evaluate the consistency of the system using either the matrix equations stated in (9) or rank conditions (10-13). If they do not hold, return “inconsistent".
4.
If the consistency conditions are satisfied, compute the matrices T i , ( i = 1 , 2 ) , U 1 , U , W , V by Eqs. (15)-(17), and by using them compute the solution X , Y , Z as indicated in (14).
To demonstrate the practical application and effectiveness of Algorithm 1, we present the following numerical example. The matrices defined below are employed to find a solution to the equations in (5).
A 1 = 3 + 3 i 3 j + 3 k 3 i 3 3 j 3 k 3 i 3 3 j 3 k 3 i + 3 3 j 3 k 3 i + 3 , A 2 = 3 i 3 j 3 k 3 3 k 3 j 3 j 3 i 3 , A 3 = 1 + i 1 i 1 + i 1 + i 1 + i 1 i 2 i 2 2 , A 4 = 1 + j 1 j 1 + j 1 + j , A 5 = 1 k 1 + k 1 k 2 2 k 2 k 1 + k 1 + k 1 k , B 1 = 1 j k i i k , B 2 = i k k i j 1 , B 3 = 1 + i 2 1 i 1 i 2 i 1 i 1 + i 2 i 1 + i , B 4 = 1 j 1 + j 1 j 1 j , B 5 = i + j 2 j i + j i j 2 i i + j i + j 2 i i j , C 1 = i 1 + i 1 j 1 + i j k 1 j k k , C 2 = k 1 + j 1 k 1 + j i k 1 k k j , C 3 = 1 + i 1 i 1 + i 1 + i 1 + i 1 i 2 i 2 2 , C 4 = 1 + i 2 1 i 1 i 2 i 1 i 1 + i 2 i 1 + i , C 5 = 1 + j 1 j 1 + j 1 + j , C 6 = 1 j 1 + j 1 j 1 j , C 7 = 1 k 1 + k 1 k 2 2 k 2 k 1 + k 1 + k 1 k , C 8 = i + j 2 j i j i j 2 i i + j i + j 2 i i j .
Utilizing these matrices, we proceed next with the steps outlined in Algorithm 1 to calculate the solution of the system represented by (5):
  • [Step 1] Compute the MPI of the given matrices using Lemma 4. For instance, we have
    A 6 = 1 48 1 i 1 + i 2 1 + i 2 i 1 + i 1 i 1 i 2 i 1 + i 2 1 i 1 + i 1 + i 2 i 1 i 2 1 + i .
    In particular, after computing the MPI and considering the specific structure of our system, we find that the matrices S i , ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 ), D 2 , E 2 , T 1 , T 2 , and U 1 turn out to be zero matrices. We also consider zero matrices as arbitrary matrices U 2 , W 2 , T 3 , T 4 , and T 6 = T 6 * . This simplification significantly reduces the complexity of the system, facilitating the subsequent steps of our algorithm.
  • [Step 2] Validate the given matrices by examining their compatibility with the representation in (9) and (10-13), ensuring the system consistency.
  • [Step 3] The next step is to calculate the matrices U , W , and V. These matrices are used to construct the general solution to our system. Their calculation relies on values computed earlier and is integral to finalizing the solution according to our algorithm.
  • [Step 5] With all necessary matrices computed, we are now in a position to present the solution (14) to the system defined in (5).
    X = 1 3456 1731 i 430 j + 3 k 1 + 2 j + 860 k 1731 + j + 430 k 1 + 2 j + 860 k 3468 i + 1720 j 3468 k 6 i + 860 j 2 k 1731 + j + 430 k 6 i + 830 j 2 k 1731 i + 430 j k , Y = 1 96 4 i 47 j + 9 k 49 9 i + 4 k 49 9 i + 4 k 4 i 47 j 9 k , Z = 1 6912 45 i 198 j 2543 k 1994 15 i 36 j 27 k 2375 + 183 i + 9 j 27 k 1994 15 i 36 j 27 k 45 i + 174 j 2561 k 27 + 9 i + 189 j + k 2375 + 183 i + 9 j 27 k 27 + 9 i + 189 j + k 18 i + 6 j + 3270 k .
Note that we provide exact numerical values, rather than approximations, because we utilize the direct method for solving the quaternion matrix system (5).

4. Conclusions

This paper establishes the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to a system of anti-Hermitian Sylvester matrix equations with constraints, employing two equivalent approaches: relations expressed using the Moore-Penrose inverse (MPI) and induced projectors of coefficient matrices, and rank conditions. Furthermore, we provide an explicit representation of the anti-Hermitian solution to the system, formulated using the MPI and induced projectors. An algorithm for determining the anti-Hermitian solution, based on this representation, is presented and subsequently demonstrated through a numerical example. This example utilizes techniques for computing row-column determinants, implemented in Maple 2024 with the Clifford package.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R. and I.K.; methodology, A.R.; software, I.K.; validation, A.R. and I.K.; formal analysis, I.K.; investigation, A.R. and I.K.; resources, A.R.; data curation, I.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, I.K.; visualization, I.K.; supervision, I.K.; project administration, A.R.; funding acquisition, A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hamilton, W.R. On quaternions, or on a new system of imaginaries in algebra. Philos. Mag. 1844, 25, 489–495. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leo, S.D.; Scolarici, G. Right eigenvalue equation in quaternionic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A. 2000, 33, 2971–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Took, C.C.; Mandic, D.P. Augmented second-order statistics of quaternion random signals. Signal Process. 2011, 91, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adler, S.L. Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuipers, J.B. Quaternions and Rotation Sequences; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Ali, I.; Akram, M.; Shakoor, A. The general solution of quaternion matrix equation having η-skew-Hermicity and its Cramer’s rule. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 2018(7939238). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Ali, I.; Akram, M.; Shakoor, A. Explicit formulas and determinantal representation for η-skew-Hermitian solution to a system of quaternion matrix equations. Filomat 2020, 34, 2601–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Ali, I.; Akram, M.; Shakoor, A. Constraint solution of a classical system of quaternion matrix equations and its Cramer’s rule. Iran J. Sci. Technol Trans. A’ Sci. 2021, 45, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I. Solving and algorithm to system of quaternion Sylvester-Type matrix equations with *-hermicity. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2022, 32, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Ali, I.; Akram, M.; Shakoor, A. The general solution of quaternion matrix equation having η-skew-Hermicity and its Cramer’s rule. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018, 2018, 7939238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Darouach, M. Solution to Sylvester equation associated to linear descriptor systems. Syst. Control Lett. 2006, 55, 835–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cavinlii, R.K.; Bhattacharyya, S.P. Robust and well-conditioned eigenstructure assignment via Sylvester’s equation. Optim. Control Appl. Methods 1983, 4(3), 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  13. Syrmos, V.L.; Lewis, F.L. Coupled and constrained Sylvester equations in system design. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 1994, 13, 663–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, R.C. A bound on the solution to a structured Sylvester equation with an application to relative perturbation theory. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 1999, 21, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Syrmos, V.L.; Lewis, F.L. Output feedback eigenstructure assignment using two Sylvester equations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 1993, 38, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, Z.Z. On Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting iteration methods for continuous Sylvester equations. J. Comput. Math. 2011, 29, 185–198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Roth, W.E. The equations AX-YB=C and AX-XB=C in matrices. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1952, 3, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baksalary, J.K.; Kala, R. The matrix equation AX-YB=C. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 1979, 25, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Q.W.; He, Z.H. Solvability conditions and general solution for the mixed Sylvester equations. Automatica 2013, 49, 2713–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, S.G.; Vu, Q.P. Simultaneous solutions of matrix equations and simultaneous equivalence of matrices. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2012, 437, 2325–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Y.Q.; Wei, Y.M. Condition numbers of the generalized Sylvester equation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 2007, 52, 2380–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Q.W.; Rehman, A.; He, Z.H.; Zhang, Y. Constraint generalized Sylvester matrix equations. Automatica 2016, 69, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, Z.H.; Wang, Q.W. A pair of mixed generalized Sylvester matrix equations. Journal of Shanghai University, Natural Science 2014, 20, 138–156. [Google Scholar]
  24. Baksalary, J.K.; Kala, R. The matrix equation AXB + CYD = E. Linear Algebra Appl. 1980, 30, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Q.W. A system of matrix equations and a linear matrix equation over arbitrary regular rings with identity. Linear Algebra Appl. 2004, 384, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Q.W.; Van der Woude, J.W.; Chang, H.X. A system of real quaternion matrix equations with applications. Linear Algebra Appl. 2009, 431, 2291–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.H.; Tian, Y.G. A simultaneous decomposition of a matrix triplet with applications. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2011, 18, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, Y.B.; Hu, X.Y. On solutions of matrix equation AXAT+BYBT=C. J. Comput. Math. 2005, 23, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kyrchei, I.I. Cramer’s Rules for Sylvester quaternion matrix equation and its special cases. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2018, 28(5), 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kyrchei, I.I. Determinantal representations of general and (skew-)Hermitian solutions to the generalized Sylvester-type quaternion matrix equation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2019, 2019, 5926832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rehman, A.; Akram, M. Optimization of a nonlinear Hermitian matrix expression with application. Filomat 2017, 31, 2805–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hajarian, M. Developing CGNE algorithm for the periodic discrete-time generalized coupled Sylvester matrix equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2015, 34, 755–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.W.; He, Z.H. Systems of coupled generalized Sylvester matrix equations. Automatica 2014, 50, 2840–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, Z.H.; Liu, J.; Tam, T.Y. The general ϕ-Hermitian solution to mixed pairs of quaternion matrix Sylvester equations. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2017, 32, 475–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. He, Z.H.; Wang, Q.W.; Zhang, Y. A system of quaternary coupled Sylvester-type real quaternion matrix equations. Automatica 2018, 87, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rehman, A.; Khan, I.A.; Anjum, R.; Hussain, I. Solvability Conditions and general solution of a system of matrix equations involving η-skew-hermitian quaternion matrices. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I. Compact formula for skew-symmetric system of matrix equations. Arabian Journal of Mathematics 2023, 12, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Rahman, M.Z.U.; Leiva, V.; Castro, C. Solvability and algorithm for Sylvester-type quaternion matrix equations wit potential applications. AIMS Mathematics 2024, 9, 19967–19996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rehman, A.; Rahman, M.Z.U.; Ghaffar, A.; Martin-Barreiro, C.; Castro, C.; Leiva, V.; Cabezas, X. Systems of quaternionic linear matrix equations: Solution, computation, algorithm, and applications. AIMS Mathematics 2024, 9, 26371–26402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Akram, M.; Ali, I.; Shakoor, A. Least-Norm of the general solution to some system of quaternion matrix equations and its determinantal representations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2019, 2019, 9072690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ding, F.; Chen, T. Iterative least squares solutions of coupled Sylvester matrix equations. IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 2005, 54, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ding, F.; Chen, T. On iterative solutions of general coupled matrix equations. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 2006, 44, 2269–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rehman, A.; Kyrchei, I.I.; Khan, I.A.; Nasir, M.; Ali, I. Closed-form formula for a classical system of matrix equations. Arab J. Basic and Applied Sciences 2022, 29, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kyrchei, I.I. Determinantal representations of the Moore-Penrose inverse over the quaternion skew field and corresponding Cramer’s rules. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2011, 59, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.-W.; Xie, L.-M. Dual Quaternion Matrix Equation AXB=C with Applications. Symmetry 2024, 16, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marsaglia, G. , Styan, G.P.H. Equalities and inequalities for ranks of matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 1974, 2, 269–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, X. The η-anti-Hermitian solution to some classic matrix equations, Appl. Math. Comput. 2018, 320, 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kyrchei, I.I. Analogs of the adjoint matrix for generalized inverses and corresponding Cramer rules. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2008, 56, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated