1. Introduction
The traditional Indian medicinal system represents one of the most ancient traditional medical practices, underpinned by a robust scientific framework and a substantial historical record of therapeutic efficacy and cultural relevance [
1]. The Indian system of medicine encompasses six distinct, officially recognized practices known as Ayush: Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy [
2].
1.1. Siddha: A Revered System of Traditional Medicine
Siddha, a traditional medical system from India, is one of the oldest healing practices, originating in South India around 5000 BC. This system has Dravidian roots and is entirely documented in the Tamil language. It has been shaped by local traditions, deeply connected to the ancient Dravidian culture. The Siddha system is regarded as a scientific manifestation of the insights of the Siddhars, who were ancient scholars. According to Siddha literature, there are eighteen Siddhars who lived during various periods in southern India, each providing unique medicinal prescriptions for different ailments, which are now accessible in printed texts and palm leaf manuscripts. As one of the earliest indigenous health practices, it is crucial to preserve the Siddha system effectively and ensure its continuity for future generations [
3].Many treatments for even the most challenging diseases have been developed from traditional medicines through advancements in science, such as reverse pharmacology and network pharmacology.In the tribal and rural areas, Siddha healers play a major role in providing healthcare and preserving traditional medical practices [
4].
The Principles of Siddha medicine are based on the Five Elements (Aimpootham) and the Three Humors (Muththaddukal). It provides safe and effective herbal and herbo-mineral treatments for a broad spectrum of common and rare diseases, along with recommendations for lifestyle modifications, including diet. Siddha medicine includes 32 types of internal and 32 external medicinal preparations.[
5].A combination of two or more herbs in mixture of powder form is refered as chooranam It is prepared by grinding either single or multiple ingredients such as dried roots, rhizomes, bark, wood, flowers, resins, leaves, seeds, and fruits [
6]. but some defects and issues are associated with chooranas such as inconsistent dosage and measurement issues, palatability and patient compliance, stability and susceptibility to environmental factors,Difficulty in Transportation and Storage, Risk of Spillage and Cross-Contamination,Inconvenience in Administration, Shorter Shelf Life and Quality Control Issues, Risk of Inhalation or Throat Irritation.
To overcome these defects some of the alternative formulation methods need to be adopted for chooranas such as tablets, capsules, oral disintegrating tablet, oral disintegrating mini tablets etc.
1.1.1. Chooranas in Siddha Medicines [7]
As per the siddha formulary of India Some of the chooranas are listed below
Amukkara chooranam
Attatic chooranam
Seendhil chooranam
Seeraga chooranam
Sivathai churnam
Sundaivatral chooranam
Inji churnam
Kalarchi chooranam
Mayiliragadhi chooranam
Nilavagai chooranam
Parangipattai chooranam
Talisadi chooranam
Thirikadugu chooranam
Triphala chooranam
1.2. Oral Disintegrating Tablet
The oral delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients has traditionally relied on conventional dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, and liquids, primarily due to their straightforward manufacturing processes and cost-effectiveness [
8].The CDER as a part of FDA has defined that the odt is a orally admisnistering solid dosage form containing medicinal substance while placed upon the tongue it must follows the two basic characteristics that is the tablet disintegrants with in 30 seconds or less and the tablet weight of 500mg or less. However, projections from the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research indicate that by 2013, individuals aged 65 and older would constitute over a quarter of Japan’s population, resulting in a significant number of elderly patients encountering difficulties with medication adherence due to compromised swallowing abilities [
9]. Moreover, swallowing dysfunction and dysphagia represent significant challenges for effective oral pharmacotherapy [
10]. To overcome these problems, one of the emerging dosage forms is the orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), which is advantageous as it disintegrates rapidly in the oral cavity upon contact with saliva, thereby obviating the requirement for swallowing. ODTs are particularly beneficial for delivering pharmaceuticals to heterogeneous patient populations, including geriatric and pediatric groups, who frequently exhibit impaired swallowing capabilities due to various physiological and psychological factors. This demographic transition underscores the necessity for innovative dosage forms that cater to the specific needs of older adults, ultimately enhancing medication adherence and improving therapeutic outcomes.Comparing to the chewable tablet the oral disintegrating tablets are slightly different in which the odt doesnot need any action of chewing or drinking liquid were the disintegration was takes places in the tongue followed by drug absorption [
11].
1.2.1. Objective
The objective of this study is to formulate a novel dosage form within Siddha medicine by converting traditional chooranam into an orally disintegrating tablet, aligned with the guidelines of the Indian Pharmacopoeia.
1.2.2. Ideal Properties of Oral Disintegrating Tablet
It should be easily administered without the need for water and should disintegrate or dissolve in the oral cavity within seconds [
12]. It need to produce pleasant feeling in the mouth and not leave any residue in the mouth after administration [
13]. It facilitates a high level of drug incorporation [
14]. It Need to Improve patient adherence.
1.2.3. Merits of Oral Disintegrating Tablet
There is no risk of airway obstruction during swallowing, which ensures safeadministration and enhances patient compliance [
15]. Easy to administer for patients with difficulty swallowing tablets(dysphagia), as well as for unconscious in coma , bedridden patients, pediatric, and geriatric patients [
16]. Cost effective Doesnot need water to swallow,Pregastric absorption of drugs leads to enhance the bioavailability of drugs and and patient compliance. Enables convenient administration and accurate dosing compared to powder formulations. Compared to liquid dosage forms, it offers more advantages in administration and is easier to carry. Prevents from first pass metabolism [
17].
2. Discussion
Traditional herbal medicinal drugs are typically available in traditional dosage forms, which may be inconvenient for geriatric and pediatric patients due to issues such as difficulty in swallowing or taste. However, converting these traditional herbal dosage forms into novel, conventional dosage forms, such as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), could enhance patient acceptability, particularly for pediatric populations. These novel dosage forms offer several advantages, including ease of administration, faster onset of action, and improved bioavailability. Compared to traditional dosage forms, novel formulations benefit from the higher regulatory standards set by pharmacy councils, ensuring their safety, efficacy, and quality. This shift toward more patient-friendly formulations could improve adherence to treatment, particularly in vulnerable groups, and expand the accessibility of traditional herbal medicines in modern healthcare.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Preparation of Chooranam
Preparation of chooranam is followed by the traditional Indian siddha medicine formulary methods. The chooranam were prepared in the laboratory using the listed authenticated raw drugs [
7]. The listed drugs are dried at certain temperatures and powdered separately further the powder is sieved through a fine mesh then the required quantities are weighed and mixed uniformly. Furthermore in the preparation of tablets the chooranam are described as API
3.1.2. Salient Features of Herbal APIs (Chooranam) and Excipients [18]
Chooranam are prepared from single or multiple number of herbal plants by various traditional methods used as APIs for the preparation of herbal ODT tablets. Suitable excipients need to be selected which are biocompatible and don’t affect the systematic effects and tablet properties considerable such as solubility, particle size, hygroscopicity, compressibility, can change the features of ODT. For the preparation of ODTs there are several criteria needs to be followed by the drug such as the drug should be ionised dispersed and penetrated into the mucosa without leaving any residue on the oral cavity with pleasant and palatable to enhance the patient acceptability furthermore, for frequent use the active ingredient weight should be less than 50mg low production cost environmentally resistance conventional procedures for packing which is elegant appealing to patients. In the formulation of odt excipients plays a crucial rate by fulfilling the requirements, such as taste masking, water solubility, enhanced dispersibility. As per IP regulation the excipients should be used and within the ranges excipients needed for ODT preparations are listed in the
Table 1.
3.2. Preparation Methods of ODTs
Various conventional methods have been developed for the preparation of ODTs such as direct compression, lyophilization, spray drying, sublimation, cotton candy process, mass extrusion, phase transition process, melt granulation, molding [
22]. These methods are summarised below.
3.2.1. Direct Compression
It’s the simplest and cost effective method using conventional equipments and excipients to manufacture oral disintegrating tablets. In this method addition of disintegrants at optimum levels in the tablets. It enhances the disintegration and dissolution rate but it results in lower hardness compared to conventional tablets. To overcome these problems different granulation methods are used to enhance the product characteristics.
3.2.1.1. Key Aspects
It is similar to conventional tablets but with higher percentage of disintegrants, to enhance the disintegration process in the tablets, easiest and cost effective method.
3.2.2. Freeze Drying [23]
It is also called lyophilization. In this method the drugs are dispersed/dissolved in a carrier of aqueous solution. Then the mixture is filled by pouring into the wells of perforated blister packs. The trays with blister packs are then passed through liquid nitrogen freezing tunnel for freezing. Then the frozen liquids blisters are refrigerated to continue the freeze drying finally the the blisters are packed
3.2.2.1. Key Aspects
The end product is highly porous low disintegration time rapid absorption and increased bioavailability. But this method has a major drawback such as high production costs and a time-consuming process and conventional packing are not suitable for this products.
3.2.3. Molding [24]
In this method the tablets are produced by molding under low pressure compared to the conventional tablets compression pressure by using water soluble comtents with hydro alcoholic solvents.
3.2.3.1. Key Aspects
Less compact and more porous enhancing rapid disintegration and dissolution.
3.2.4. Sublimation
Inert solid material that volatilize rapidly like urea, camphor, ammonium carbonate were added to the other tablet contents and compressed directly due to endothermic reaction. the inert solid materials are volatilized this process is sublimation due to this porous structure generated on the compressed tablets [
18,
25].
3.2.4.1. Key Aspects
Rapid disintegration/ dissolution due to porous in nature heat-sensitive drugs are not suitable due to harmful residual adjuvants
3.2.5. Spray Drying
In this method the liquid mixture of drug and excipients are sprayed into the hot chamber which creates porous structure then the resulting microparticles are combined with mannitol and kneaded with distilled water and dried at 60oC for 2 hours after drying the resulted granules are sieved mixed with the additional excipients are compressed into tablets [
26].
3.2.5.1. Key Aspects
This method are suitable for inhalation and oral formulation, rapid disintegration and dissolution but high in production cost.
3.2.6. Cotton Candy Process
A specialised spinning device is used to produce crystalline flosses the flosses were formed by flash melting and spinning saccharides or polysaccharides such as polymaltodextrin at high temperatures180-266
oC [
19],[
27].
The resulting flosses of matrix is milled and mixed with api and additional excipients further compressed into oral disintegrating tablets.
3.2.6.1. Key Aspects
Mainly implemented for taste masking, rapid disintegration, accumulation of large quantity of drugs. But thermoliable drugs are not suitable.
3.2.7. Mass Extrusion
In this process water soluble solvents such as polyethylene glycol, ethanol or methanol are used to soften the drug mixture which is than extruded through a syringe or sieve mesh after extrusion the volatile solvents are removed by evaporation [
28]. As a result a solidified string shaped gel is obtained and which is than crushed and added to additional excipients converted into ODT by compaction methods.
3.2.7.1. Key Aspects
In this method the drug taste is masked, and makes the drug more porous to enhance the disintegration.
3.3. Quality Control Test
3.3.1. For Herbal Drug
As per PLIM & IP regulation the Quality control parameters for herbal drugs is studied.
3.3.1.1. Authentication Study [29]
Various methods are often used for authentication, identification, and discrimination purposes. These methods involve single approaches such as molecular-based techniques, chemical fingerprinting, and morphological and anatomical analysis. Overall, each of these methods has a different approach to the authentication of herbal-related products, and the choice depends on the specific needs.
3.3.1.2. HPTLC
High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) was conducted on 20×10 cm silica gel 60 F254 plates, using a mobile phase composed of ethyl acetate, methanol, formic acid, and water in a ratio of [20:2.5:0.5:2 (v/v)]. Standard solutions of Quercetin, Rutin, Luteolin, and Vitexin (each at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, with 5.0 µL of each) were applied to the plates in 10 mm bands. The application of the samples was carried out using an automated band applicator with a 100 µL syringe. The settings used for application were as follows: band length of 10 mm, application rate of 10 sec/µL, a distance of 4 mm between bands, 1.5 cm from the plate edge, and 2 cm from the bottom of the plate. For band quantification, densitometric scanning was performed using specific scanning software. The scan was carried out in absorption/reflection mode with a slit size of 5 × 0.1 mm, a scanning speed of 20 mm/s, and a monochromator bandwidth of 20 nm.[
30]. The system was optimized for wavelengths of 254 nm, 366 nm, and within the visible range.
3.3.2. For Formulated ODTs
Quality control parameters for ODTs is slightly different from conventional tablets such as wetting time, absorption ratio, moisture uptake, taste evaluation and invivo disintegration time are used for ODT they are classified into following two types [
18].
Pre compression parameter
Post compression tablet parameter
3.3.2.1. Pre Compression Parameters [51].
Pre compression parameters are evaluated for the purpose of determining the powder characteristics for subsequent processing the evaluation studies which includes bulk density, tap density, carrs index, angle of repose and hausners ratio.
3.3.2.1.1. Bulk Density
An accurately weighed quantity of powder is introduced into a 100 mL measuring cylinder. The volume of the powder in the cylinder is measured, and the bulk density is calculated using the following formula:
Bulk density= weight of the powder /volume of the powder
3.3.2.1.2. Tapped Density
An accurately weighed quantity of powder is transferred into a 100 mL measuring cylinder. The cylinder is tapped 100 times on a hard, flat surface. The tapped volume of the powder in the cylinder is noted, and the tapped density is calculated using the formula
Tapped density = weight of the powder /tapped volume of the powder
3.3.2.1.3. Flow Rate
The flow rate of granules is determined by pouring an accurately weighed quantity of granules into a funnel with an 8 mm orifice diameter. The granules are allowed to flow freely through the orifice, and the time taken for the complete dispersion is recorded [
31]. The flow rate is then calculated using the formula
Flow rate =weight of the granules / time in seconds
3.3.2.1.4. Carrs Index
Carr’s index is a measure of the compressibility percentage of powder blends and can be calculated using the formula
Df= Bulk density
Do= Tapped density
3.3.2.1.5. Hausners Ratio [32]
H ausners ratio is determined by the basis of bulk density and tapped density by using the following formula
Table 2.
IP limits for compressibility index,flowability and hausners ratio.
Table 2.
IP limits for compressibility index,flowability and hausners ratio.
| Compressibility Index |
Flowability |
Hausner’s Ratio |
| 5–15 |
Excellent |
1.05–1.18 |
| 12–16 |
Good |
1.14–1.20 |
| 18–21 |
Fair-passable |
1.22–1.26 |
| 21–33 |
Poor |
1.30–1.54 |
| 33–37 |
Very poor |
1.50–1.61 |
| >40 |
Very-very poor |
>1.61 |
Hausner ratio = Tapped density/Bulk density
3.3.2.1.6. Angle of Repose [33]
The angle of repose is defined as the maximum possible angle between the horizontal plane and the surface of the pile of powder. In loose powder or granules, the frictional force can be measured by the angle of repose, which indicates the flow property of the powder.The angle of repose is determined by placing a funnel at a standard, defined height (h). The powder is allowed to flow through the funnel, forming a pile [
50]. The angle of repose is calculated using the height and radius of the powder heap.
Table 3.
IP Limits for angle of repose.
Table 3.
IP Limits for angle of repose.
| Angle of repose |
Flowability |
| <25° |
Excellent flow |
| 25–30° |
Good |
| 30–40° |
Satisfactory or passable |
| 40–50° |
Poor |
| >50° |
Very poor or damp |
3.3.2.1.7. FTIR Study
This study was performed to determine whether the active ingredients are compatible with the excipients. Individual excipients were also analyzed using FTIR within the range of 4000–600 cm⁻¹. After recording, changes in the vibrational or stretching bands of key functional groups in the FTIR spectrum were used to indicate drug-excipient interactions. In this method, the pellet was prepared using the potassium bromide pressed pellet technique. The developed pellets were placed in the IR chamber of the FTIR spectrophotometer, and the spectrum of functional groups was determined using the software [
34].
3.3.2.2. Post Compression Tablet Parameter3.3.2.2.1. Organoleptic Characteristics
The shape and size of uncoated tablets were examined, whether in round, oval, or caplet form, with weights ranging from 150 mg to 900 mg. The color of the tablets was assessed under both natural and artificial light. Additionally, the dimensions and gloss finish were also determined [
35].
3.3.2.2.2. Weight Variation
Weight variation is determined by weighing randomly taken 20 weighs individually tablets from a batch and calculate the average weight of the tablet once the average weight is obtained the mean weight is calculated [
47].
For lower limit:
Minimum weight – Average weight/Average Weight × 100
For upper limit: Maximum weight – Average weight/Average Weight × 100
Table 4.
IP limits for weight variation.
Table 4.
IP limits for weight variation.
| Weight average (mg) |
Max SD. |
| Less than 85mg |
10 |
| 85mg – 250mg |
7.5 |
| Greater than 250 |
5 |
3.3.2.2.3. Hardness and Thickness [36]
Hardness of the tablet is termed as force require to break the tablet, By randomly taking three tablet and each tablet is placed vertically on the monsanto hardness tester to determine the strength of the tablet. The hardness of the tablet is measured in kg/cm2. Thickness of the tablet is determined by using vernier calliper.
3.3.2.2.4. Friability
Friability is used to assess the tablet's durability during packing and transportation. The friability is evaluated by placing 10 tablets in a Roche friabilator for 4 minutes at 25 rpm [
37]. The percentage of weight loss is calculated using the following formula
Where, W1 = Initial weight of tablets
W2 = Final weight of tablets
3.3.2.2.5. Disintegration Test
The disintegration of the tablet is evaluated using the USP disintegration apparatus, which consists of six glass tubes, each 3 inches long, open at the top and positioned against a 10-inch screen at the bottom end of the basket rack assembly. A tablet is placed in each tube, and the basket is then immersed in a beaker containing 1 liter of water, maintained at 37 ± 2°C. The basket is positioned 2.5 cm above the bottom of the beaker. The test is run, and the time taken for the tablet to completely disintegrate is recorded.
3.3.2.2.6. Wetting Time (Wt) and Water Absorption Ratio (R)
The wetting time of the tablet is determined by placing the Whatman filter paper, folded once diametrically in a petri dish with a diameter of 8.5 cm. A small amount of water (8 mL) containing the water-soluble dye Rhodamine B (0.1 g) was added to the filter paper inside the Petri dish at the initial time =0 hrs the tablet is placed on the paper after complete wetting the time is recorded. The emergence of dye on the tablet surface indicated the point of complete wetting [
38].
After the complete wetting the tablet is reweighed and determined the absorption ratio by the following equation
Wa = Weight of the tablet after absorption (after it has fully absorbed water)
Wb = Initial weight of the tablet (before water absorption)
3.3.2.2.7. Taste/Mouth Sensation Test
Orally disintegrating tablet needs to be plays a major role on the taste masking to enhance the patience compliance especially for paediatrics and geriatrics accetabilty, where the mouth feeling test can be determined by choosing the healthy volunteers by placing the tablet different batches on the tongue for 30 seconds [
39]. and determine the sensation of the patients ratings like 0= good 1= tasteless 2= slightly bitter 3= bitterness 4= Terrible .
3.3.2.2.8. Moisture Uptake
This test is performed to determine the stability of the formulation by placing 10 tablets on the dessicator (37° C, 1 d)and weighed after that the tablets are placed at 75% RH (25° C, 15d). reweigh the tablet as result the amount of moisture uptake by the tablet is determined [
40,
48].
3.3.2.2.9. Invitro Disintegration Study [41]
It is determined by dropping the tablet of batches in the beaker containing 50ml of ph buffer 6.8. in that 3 tablets are randomly selected from each formulation and the dispersion time of the tablet is recorded
3.3.2.2.10. In-Vivo Disintegration Test
This test is performed on healthy volunteers by placing 2 or 3 tablets in the mouth and measuring the time, in seconds, until the tablet completely disintegrates [
49].
3.3.2.2.11. In-Vitro Dissolution Test [42]
Invitro dissolution study was carried out by using usp II type dissolution apparatus is used where the dissolution medium is filled with phosphate buffer ph.6.8. and maintains the temperature level at 37±0.5°C. After the test started a 5ml aliquot of dissolution medium was pipette out from the medium at the time interval of 2 minutes and replace it with phosphate buffer. The pipette out liquid is filteres and diluted with suitable solvents analysed to determine the amount of drug released from the formulation is determined.
3.3.2.2.12. Drug Content
For drug content analysis, accurately weigh 20 tablets and crush them into a fine powder. Weigh a sample of the powder equivalent to the required amount of active drug (in mg) and dissolve it in a suitable solvent. The solution should then be filtered through a 0.45 µm millipore filter to remove any impurities [
43,
44]. Finally, the filtered solution is analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer to determine the drug content.
3.3.2.2.13. Stability Study
As per ich guidelines the stabilty study was carried out to determine the stability were 20 tablets are packed in each 10 mL high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottle and sealed thermally, then placed in a humidity chamber (45 ± 2° C and 75% ± 5% RH)[
45,
46]. for three months at each month the tablets are evaluated that each formulation is remains under the mentioned specification means passes and no significant changesin the formulation.
4. Conclusions
Currently, the preparation and evaluation of Siddha drug dosage forms (Tablets) primarily rely on basic evaluation methods such as friability and disintegration. However, there is a growing need for more comprehensive evaluation parameters that better reflect the unique characteristics and challenges of herbal medicines. In the future, an increasing number of researchers will likely focus on the development of novel herbal dosage forms, driven by the rising global interest in natural medicine. The inclusion of additional evaluation parameters, along with defined ranges, will significantly contribute to enhancing the quality and standardization of herbal products. This will not only improve the efficacy and safety of herbal medicines but also promote the widespread acceptance and growth of the herbal market, making these treatments more accessible and reliable for patients worldwide.
Funding
This study was financially supported for research and Publication by Central Council for Research in Siddha for providing.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank CCRS, Ministry of AYUSH, for providing funding and support for the IMR project (Sanction order No. 972/2022-23) in “Formation and Optimizations of Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT’s), Single and Bilayer tablet formulations to be developed in classical Siddha Formulations to enhance patient compliance”.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| ODT |
Orally Disintegrating Tablet |
| API |
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients |
| BD |
Bulk Density |
| TD |
Tapped Density |
References
- Karmegam, D.; Prakash, M.; Karkalan, N.; Bagavandas, M. Development of database structure and indexing for Siddha medicine system: A platform for Siddha literature analytics. Dialogues Health 2022, 1, 100008. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mukherjee, K.P. Evaluation of Indian Traditional Medicine. Drug Information Journal 2001, 35, 623–632. [Google Scholar]
- Karunamoorthi, K.; Jegajeevanaram, K.; Xavier, J.; Jayaraman, N.; Melita, L. Tamil Traditional Medicinal System—A SiddhaIndigenous Health Practice in the International Perspectives. E-Tang 2012, 2.
- Mutheeswaran, S.; Pandikumar, P.; Chellappandian, M.; Ignacimuthu, S. Documentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Local Knowledge on Medicinal Plants Among Traditional Siddha Healers in Virudhunagar District of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2011, 137, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sujeethasai, K. Pharmacological Analysis of Sivathai Chooranam (Polyherbal Formulation) in Siddha Medicine: A Literature Review. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 2020, 11, 38494–38497. [Google Scholar]
- Manimekalai, K.; Aswini, P.; Nalina Saraswathi, K.; Saravana Devi, M.D.; Velpandian, V. Standardisation and physiochemical evaluation of the drug Raja Elathi Chooranam – A Siddha polyherbal formulation. Int. J. Health Sci. Res. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar]
- The Siddha Formulary of India, (1992). Part I, First Edition, Formulary – Chapter No.21. Curanams, Published by Department of Health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 151-156.
- Al Khattawi, A.; Mohammed, A.R. Compressed orally disintegrating tablets, excipients, evolution, and formulation strategies. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Krupa, A.; Jachowicz, R.; Pędzich, Z.; Wodnicka, K. The influence of the API properties on the ODTs manufacturing from co-processed excipient systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 2012, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stegemann, S.; Gosh, M.; Breitkrentz, J. Swallowing dysfunction and dysphagia is an unrecognized challenge for oral drug therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 430, 197–206. [Google Scholar]
- Chinwala, M. Recent formulation advances and therapeutic usefulness of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs). Pharmacy 2020, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, D.; Chakraborthy, S.; Sanjay, S.; Brahmeshwar, M. Mouth dissolving tablets I: An overview of formulation technology. Scientia Pharm. 2009, 77, 309–326. [Google Scholar]
- Nand, P.; Vashis, N.; Anand, A.; Sushma, D. Mouth dissolving tablets: A novel drug delivery system. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2010, 1, xx. [Google Scholar]
- Dinesh Kumar, P.; Tajaswi, V.; Dhatrija, K. Fast dissolving tablets: An overview. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 3, 348–355. [Google Scholar]
- Rakesh, P.; Mona, P.; Prabodh, C.S.; Dhirendar, K.; Sanju, N. Orally disintegrating tablets: Friendly to pediatrics and geriatrics. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2020, 2, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, G.C.; Washington, N.; Peach, J.; Murray, R.G.; Kennerley, J. The behavior of a fast dissolving dosage form (Expidet) followed by γ-scintigraphy. Int. J. Pharm. 1987, 40, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- Seager, H. Drug delivery products and the Zydis fast dissolving dosage form. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997, 50, 375–382. [Google Scholar]
- Poursharifi Ghourichay, M.; Kiaie, S.H.; Nokhodchi, A.; Javadzadeh, Y. Formulation and quality control of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs): Recent advances and perspectives. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 6618934, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagar, P.; Singh, K.; Chauhan, I.; et al. Orally disintegrating tablets: Formulation, preparation techniques, and evaluation. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 1, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
- Chowdary, K.; Suchitra, B. Recent research on orodispersible tablets – A review. Int. Res. J. Pharm. Appl. Sci. 2014, 4, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, A.C.; Chen, L.-L.H. Fast-dissolving intraoral drug delivery systems. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2001, 11, 981–986. [Google Scholar]
- Jeganathan, N.S.; Kannan, K.; Manavalan, R.; Vasanthi, H.R. Standardization of a Siddha formulation Amukkara Curanam by HPTLC. Afr. J. Trad. CAM 2008, 5, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
- Omar, S.; AbdAlla, F.; Abdelgawad, N. Effect of mannitol on Physical characters of lyophilized fast-disintegrating tablets. J. Adv. Pharm. Res. 2017, 1, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Patil, M.B.; Patil, S.R.; Paschapur, M.S. Development and characterization of melt-in-mouth tablets of haloperidol by sublimation technique. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 1, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Kasper, J.C.; Friess, W. The freezing step in lyophilization: Physico-chemical fundamentals, freezing methods, and consequences on process performance and quality attributes of biopharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 78, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, D.N.; Bimodal, M.; Singh, S.K.; Vijaya, K. Spray dried excipient base: A novel technique for the formulation of orally disintegrating tablets. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badgujar, B.; Mundada, A. The technologies used for developing Orally disintegrating tablets: A review. Acta Pharm. 2011, 61, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gryczke, A.; Schminke, S.; Maniruzzaman, M.; Beck, J.; Douroumis, D. Development and evaluation of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) containing ibuprofen granules prepared by hot melt extrusion. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2011, 86, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sima, I.A.; Andrási, M.; Sârbu, C. Chemometric Assessment of Chromatographic Methods for Herbal Medicines Authentication and Fingerprinting. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2018, 56, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, M.J.; Ahmad, S.; Kohli, K.; Ali, J.; Khar, R.K. Stability-Indicating HPTLC Determination of Curcumin in Bulk Drug and Pharmaceutical Formulations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 39, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, D.; Sharma, R. Solid Dispersion: A Novel Approach for Enhancement of Solubility and Dissolution Rate: A Review. Indian J. Pharm. Biol. Res. 2019, 7, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshio, K.; Masazumi, K.; Shuichi, A.; Hiroaki, N. Evaluation of Rapidly Disintegrating Tablets Manufactured by Phase Transition of Sugar Alcohols. J. Control. Release 2005, 105, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
- Kushekar, B.S. Mouth Dissolving Tablets: A Novel Drug Delivery System. Pharma Times 2003, 35. [Google Scholar]
- Ayub, S.; Hanif, S.; Inzamam ul Huq, U.; Irfan, M.; Ali, I.; Madkhali, O.A.; Farzana, K.; Syed, M.A.; Shahid, N.; Aftab, T.; Asmatullah, M. Pre and Post Characterization of ODTs with Emphasis on Compression Force and Quality of Super-Disintegrants: In Vivo Analysis in Healthy Volunteers. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 36, 1767–1775. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Irfan, M.; Rabel, S.; Bukhtar, Q.; Qadir, M.I.; Jabeen, F.; Khan, A. Orally Disintegrating Films: A Modern Expansion in Drug Delivery System. Saudi Pharm. J. 2015. [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, M.A.; Abou el Ela, A.E.S.F. Optimized Furosemide Taste Masked Orally Disintegrating Tablets. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Puttewar, T.; Kshirsagar, M.; Chandewar, A.; et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Tablet of Taste Masked Doxylamine Succinate Using Ion Exchange Resin. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2010, 22, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
- Akdag, Y.; Gulsun, T.; Izat, N.; Cetin, M.; Oner, L.; Sahin, S. Evaluation of Preparation Methods for Orally Disintegrating Tablets. Med. Sci. Int. Med. J. 2020, 9, 265–269. [Google Scholar]
- Shirai, Y.; Sogo, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Kolma, K.; Fujoka, H.; Makita, H.; Nakamura, Y. A Novel Fine Granule System for Masking Bitter Taste. Pharm. Res. Soc. Jpn. 1992, Received July 20, 1992.
- Li, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhu, L.; et al. Liposomal Andrographolide Dry Powder Inhalers for Treatment of Bacterial Pneumonia via Anti-Inflammatory Pathway. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 528, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Koner, J.S.; Rajabi-Siahboomi, A.R.; Missaghi, S.; et al. Conceptualisation, Development, Fabrication and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Disintegration Tester for Orally Disintegrating Tablets. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Cirri, M.; Rangoni, C.; Maestrelli, F.; Corti, G.; Mura, P. Development of Fast-Dissolving Tablets of Flurbiprofen-Cyclodextrin Complexes. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2005, 31, 697–707. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhari, P.D.; Chaudhari, S.P.; Kolhes, R.; Dave, K.V. Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Tablets of Famotidine. Indian Drugs 2005, 42, 641–649. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, N.; Augsburger, L.L. Functionality Comparison of 3 Classes of Superdisintegrants in Promoting Aspirin Tablet Disintegration and Dissolution. AAPS PharmSciTech 2005, 6, E634–E640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thulluru, A.; Palei, N.N.; Vimala, M.; Vidyasagar, M.; Vishnupriya, K. Quality by Design Approach to Optimize the Taste Masked Zolpidem Tartrate Oral Disintegrating Tablets. Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Forms Technol. 2018, 10, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umalkar, D.G.; Shinde, G.V.; Bangale, G.S.; Rajesh, K.S.; Murthy, R.S. Design and Evaluation of Orodispersible Tablet of Aceclofenac Using Different Superdisintegrants by 2³ Factorial Designs. Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Forms Technol. 2010, 2, 198–203. [Google Scholar]
- Elkhodairy, K.A.; Hassan, M.A.; Afifi, S.A. Formulation and Optimization of Orodispersible Tablets of Flutamide. Saudi Pharm. J. 2014, 22, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamboj, M.; Goyal, S.; Rakha, P.; et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Metformin Orodispersible Tablets. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2011, 68, 717–723. [Google Scholar]
- Arun Raj, R.; Harindran, D.J. Formulation and Evaluation of Carvedilol Solid Dispersion Tablets for Solubility Enhancement. Eur. J. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 4, 337–348. [Google Scholar]
- Rane, R.D.; Gulve, N.H.; Patil, V.V.; Thakare, M.V.; Patil, R.V. Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Tablet of Albendazole. Int. Curr. Pharm. J. 2012, 1, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onkar, D.; Manojkumar, P. Development and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Tablets of Diltiazem Hydrochloride. Int. J. Res. Ayurveda Pharm. 2015, 6, 493–501. [Google Scholar]
Table 1.
list of excipients and its characteristics.
Table 1.
list of excipients and its characteristics.
| Excipients |
Function |
Example |
| Super disintegrant |
It produces rapid disintegration anddissolution rate. In the presence of other ingredients like water soluble excipiets and effervescent agents furtherenhances the disintegration process. |
Microcrystalline cellulose Crospovidone, sodium starch gpycolate, carboxyl methyl cellulose, pregelatinated starch [19]. |
| Binder |
Maintains the integrity strength of tablet until administration |
PVP, Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulos, poly vinyl alcohol |
| Filler |
Increases bulkiness of tablet |
Sugar and sugar based derivatives (Maltos, mannitol, lactilol, xylitol) |
| Surface active agents |
Enhances solubilization and reduces interfacial tension of ODT. |
Starch hydrolysate, sodium doecylsulfate, sodium lauryl sulphate [20]. |
| Lubricants |
Reduces the friction between the punchesand enhances bulkiness of the tablet |
Magnesium stearate, zinc state, Poly ethyleneglycol, magnesium lauryl sulphate [21]. |
| Sweetner |
Masking the unpleasant taste the tabletsbacts as taste masker |
Sucralose, aspartame, sodiumsaccharine |
| Flavors |
Enhances the patient compliance and acceptability |
Peppermint, clove oil, anise oil, citrus oils, fruit essences [19]. |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).