1. Introduction
The well-known and widely described panorama of conventional T cells is flanked by a second, not still completely understood and more enigmatic ground: that of unconventional (UC) T cells.
UC T cells encompass mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells and γδ T cells, and they have so far been significantly less characterized than conventional T cells. They typically present TCRs with less diversity compared to conventional T cells and sense a variety of molecules through their TCR, including peptides, lipids and metabolites. UC T cells are considered innate-like T cells because they acquire effector characteristics, such as rapid cytokine release and expression of chemokine receptors and integrins, before exiting the thymus. Consequently, they accumulate in tissues sooner than conventional T cells, around the second trimester in humans and within three weeks of birth in mice [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5]. In recent years, there has been a growing appreciation of the diverse role of UC T cells in cancer. Although these cells express a TCR, their innate-like properties, such as independence of antigen-mediated education via MHC molecules and rapid response to their cytokine milieu provide these cells with the ability to quickly adapt to their surroundings. Because of their plasticity and capability to feel the environment, these cells can behave differently depending on what they sense around them.
Moreover, together with these groups of UC T cells, a further interest in other types of unconventional T cells, like CD4 and CD8αβ double positive and double negative ones, is currently growing and their roles in immune regulation and cytotoxicity are increasingly recognized.
The way in which these several types of UC T cells interact with epithelial cells (ECs) and other immune cells, thus exerting a potential role in tumor development and pro- or anti-tumoral immunity, is examined in detail in this review, also providing promising avenues for their therapeutic exploitation in cancer treatment.
2. Unconventional T Cells: ANTI- or pro-Tumoral?
2.1. MAIT Cells
MAIT cells express a semi-invariant TCR with the α chain comprising TRAV1–2 TRAJ33/20/12 paired most commonly with members of the TRBV6 family and TRBV20–1 TCRβ chain in humans [
6,
7]. In mice, MAIT cells utilize the orthologous TRAV1-TRAJ33 TCRα chain, often paired with a TRBV19 or TRBV13 β chain
6,7. MAIT cells recognize small metabolite products of bacterial and yeast riboflavin biosynthesis when presented by the nonpolymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-related 1 molecule (MR1). MAIT TCR especially recognizes the vitamin B2 precursors 5-(2- oxopropylideneamino)-6-D-ribitylaminouracil (5-OP-RU) and 5-(2- oxoethylideneamino)-6-D-ribitylaminouracil (5-OE-RU) presented on MR1 [
8,
9]. Once activated, MAIT cells produce a variety of cytokines like IFNγ, TNFα and IL-17, together with other effector molecules, such as perforin, granulysin, and granzymes (GZM) A, GZM B, GZM K, GZM M, and GZM H [
8,
9]. Moreover, they can induce maturation of dendritic cells[
10] and proliferation of cytotoxic CD8
+ T cells [
11].
Ussher et al., in 2014, demonstrated that MAIT cells can be activated also in a TCR-independent manner, directly responding to IL-12 and IL-18 stimulation, which triggers IFNγ production [
12]. This suggests that these cells, in addition to classic presentation of antigens by MR1, may be activated through alternative mechanisms. As a consequence of this eclectic behavior, MAIT cells could play a role in antitumoral immunity, as demonstrated by Petley et al., where an anti-tumor function of NK cells was reported after being activated by MAIT cells-produced IFNγ [
13]. In addition, MAIT cells exhibited cytolytic activity in vitro against multiple myeloma cell lines pulsed with 5-OP-RU [
14] and the fact that their exhausted phenotype is associated with relapses of cancer is an additional confirmation of their potential to be cancer-fighting cells [
14]. In a study involving ninety-nine patients with mucosal associated cancers, such as gastric and colon cancer, levels of circulating MAIT cells were reduced because of a strong recruitment at the level of mucosal cancer tissues, where they had the potential to kill cancer cells. This suggests that the activity of MAIT cells is related to the degree of cancer progression in certain mucosal tissues[
15].
However, MAIT cells have also been associated with different cancers, where they acquire a dysfunctional state, lacking effector function and gaining a profile similar to that of exhausted T conventional (PD-1
highTim-3
+CD39
+)[
6]. For instance, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor-educated MAIT cells upregulate inhibitory molecules like PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, strongly decreasing IFNγ, IL17, GZM B and perforin production [
16]. In fact, high infiltration of MAIT cells in HCC significantly correlates with poor clinical outcomes [
16]. While, in the context of CRC, a higher IL-17 production observed through flow cytometry, together with an increased expression of inflammatory genes like RSG1, CCL3, and CCL4, detected by scRNA-seq, have been associated with tumor-infiltrating MAIT cells [
17]. In addition, Mr1
-/- mice injected with B16F10 melanoma cells show reduced metastasis compared to wild type mice, reversed by adoptive transfer of MAIT cells into Mr1
-/- mice [
18].
2.2. NKT Cells
NKT cells are categorized into two broad classes: type 1 and type 2 NKT cells. While circulating type 2 NKT cells are more frequent in humans and express diverse TCRs conferring broader lipid antigen specificities, type 1 NKT cells, also known as invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, are less frequent, accounting for around 1% of T cells in blood and liver [
19]. However, iNKT cells, extensively studied in many contexts because easier to detect, express a restricted T-cell receptor (TCR) and markers typically found on NK cells [
20]. The TCR on iNKT cells is semi-invariant, made up of the Vα24-Jα18 chain in humans and the Vα14-Jα18 chain in mice, paired with a limited selection of β chains, which are Vβ11 in humans and Vβ8, Vβ7, and Vβ2 in mice[
19,
21]. This specialized TCR allows iNKT cells to recognize lipid-based antigens presented by the MHC class-I-like molecule CD1d.
The first association between iNKT cells and cancer was reported in 1995, when a strong antitumor activity was associated, upon their stimulation, with the glycolipid α-GalCer of murine sponges [
22,
23]. α-GalCer, the prototypic agonist of iNKT cells, in addition to its binding to the CD1d antigen presenting molecule, can synergistically act with IL-12, thus activating both iNKT and NK cells, increasing IFNγ levels and their killing activity[
24]. Thus, a significant reduction of distant tumor metastasis at early stages of tumor-bearing is observed. Consistently, analyses of scRNA-Seq and imaging mass cytometry performed on tissues from pancreatic cancer liver metastasis (PCLM) mouse models showed an increased cytotoxic activity of iNKT/NK cells and an exclusion of tumor associated macrophages from the tumor microenvironment when α-GalCer treatment was administered to mice [
25]. As for other UT cells, depending on environmental conditions iNKT cells can perform pro-tumorigenic activities. For example, in the context of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), iNKT cells are initially implicated in tumor surveillance and can delay the disease onset, but once the disease occurs, they become functionally impaired and their engagement, together with the expression of CD1d by Tcl1-CLL cells, highly correlate with disease progression[
26]. Further evidence concerning the pro-tumor activity of iNKT cells has been found analyzing their relationship with microbiota. In colorectal cancer, iNKT cells are aberrantly activated by different tumor-associated bacteria to produce both IL-17 and Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), consequently recruiting tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), or chitinase 3-like-1 protein (CHI3L1), impairing cell lytic machinery[
27,
28].
Together, these findings underline not only the plasticity of iNKTs, but also their great potential to be re-educated and exploited for therapeutic purposes, as suggested in the following paragraphs of this review.
2.3. γδ Cells
Like αβ T cells, γδ T cells develop in the thymus, from double negative (DN) (CD4−CD8−) cells expressing TCRs composed of γ-chains and δ-chains [
29]. In humans, a Notch-independent DN pathway generates mature DN and SP (CD8+) γδ T cells, while a Notch-dependent DP pathway produces immature and rare CD4+ SP cells, followed by DP γδ T cells. Differently, in mice, strong TCR signaling without Notch signal induces γδ lineage commitment. Knowledge of the exact antigen recognition mechanism is still limited and specific ligands for γδ T cells are not well understood. The antigen recognition of γδ T cells does not seem to depend on the processing by antigen presenting cells (APCs) and consequently on the MHC-mediated presentation [
30,
31,
32] and no general coreceptor needed have been identified so far. Depending on the local microenvironment they can differentiate into Th1-like, Th2-like, Th9-like, Th17-like, and Treg-like cells [
33,
34,
35]. The “polyspecificity” of γδ T cells is their main feature, rendering them interesting cells with both innate and adaptive characteristics and capable of unique immune functions in different pathological and physiological conditions [
36]. It has been shown that cytokines like TGF-β, IL-4 and more recently IL-21 promote the acquisition of pro-tumoral properties by both human and murine γδ T cells [
37,
38]. In mice, γδ T cells mediate many pro-tumor functions through expression of IL-17A, a pleiotropic cytokine that modulates the behavior of both cancer and immune cells. In particular, ApcMin/+ mice develop colorectal cancer via direct stimulation of the IL-17 receptor on intestinal epithelial cells. This is mediated by IL-17A-producing γδ T cells, which promote proliferation and inhibit CXCL9 and CXCL10 expression. Thus, anti-tumoral CD8+ T cell recruitment is prevented [
39,
40]. IL-17A-producing γδ T cells can also re-educate neutrophils and macrophages towards an immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic phenotype in different cancers (breast, liver and ovarian) [
41,
42,
43,
44].
Then, γδ T cells have been reported to potentially polarize toward FOXP3+ regulatory phenotype, suppressing the proliferation of anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)42. This phenotype of γδ T cells accumulates in human breast cancer expressing interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) [
45]. Moreover, the TGF-β secreted by γδ T cells can induce the epithelial to mesenchymal transition during which tumors can escape immune detection, ultimately resulting in metastasis [
46].
Despite these evidence, γδ T cells are strongly cytotoxic and can perform antitumor activity [
47] and their presence within tumors is thought to be a favorable prognostic factor, associated with better patient survival across several cancer types (myeloma, melanoma, leukemia, bladder cancer) [
48,
49,
50,
51]. In fact, they can lyse cancer cells through different mechanisms, including the perforin-granzyme pathway [
52]. For instance, in renal cancer γδ T cells display a selective lytic potential exclusively toward autologous primary renal cancer cells, depending on the TCR and the NKG2D receptor [
53]. By releasing IFNγ and cytolytic granules, γδ T cells can kill myeloma cells, recognized through ICAM-1 and mevalonate pathway metabolites on the surface 49, while the majority of melanoma-infiltrating γδ T cells is able to kill cancer cells by producing IFNγ and TNF-α [
50]. In addition, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia a higher percentage of CD8+ γδ T cells is associated with more favorable outcomes of the disease, so that these cells are now considered an early circulating biomarker of good prognosis [
49].
Finally, since they also display characteristics of APCs, in the context of gastric cancer, tumor-activated γδ T cells not only kill tumor cells efficiently, but also strongly induce primary CD4+ and CD8+
αβ T cells proliferation and differentiation, increasing their cytotoxic functions and abrogating immunosuppression by T regulatory cells [
54].
2.4. Others
A growing interest in minor T cells subsets, such as double negative (DN) T and double-positive (DP) T cells, has been shown in recent decades.
The transcription factors ThPOK and Runx3 regulate the differentiation of helper CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell lineages, by epigenetically regulating the expression of either the CD4 or CD8 co-receptor [
55,
56] on single positive (SP) T cells that enter the periphery. However, these cell fates are not mutually exclusive, because mature CD4+CD8+ double positive T cells are present in the circulation of healthy individuals and augmented in some diseases. In 2010, enhanced frequencies DP T cells in melanomas were identified. As they demonstrated broad tumor reactivity, it was hypothesized a potential participation in antitumor immune responses [
57]. Then, recent studies demonstrated that DP T cells in murine and human melanoma derive from SP T cells which, through distinct transcriptional and epigenetic modulation induced via TCR signaling, just acquire the opposite co-receptor, displaying different role and functions. In mice, DP T cells showed an increased expression of Foxp3, exhibiting modest immunosuppressive features in vitro, while human DP T cells revealed a phenotype similar to that of classical cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, suggesting a potential capability of contributing to tumor eradication [
55]. But, in 2019 a study revealed an association between the increased DP T cells frequency in patients with urological cancers and the polarization of CD4+ T cells toward a Th2-like phenotype, consequently bringing to a reduction of antitumor immunity and facilitating immune escape [
58].
As for the DN T cells, they demonstrated a great cytotoxic activity towards various hematopoietic cancers (myeloma, T cell leukemia, Burkitt’s lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia) both in vivo and in vitro without HLA restriction [
59]. In particular, DN T cells isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy individuals and co-cultured with pancreatic cancer or non-small cell lung cancer cell lines in vitro, are cytotoxic and inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells [
60,
61]. So, even if their differentiation, regulation and effector activities are all points that still need to be elucidated, they seem to be actively involved in both regulatory functions and in protective immune responses so far [
62]. However, a subset of DN T cells is remarkably higher in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to healthy individuals and correlates with poor prognosis [
63]. In addition, some studies found that TCRαβ+ DN T cells play an immunosuppressive function in mouse glioma and melanoma models and are increased in the lymph nodes of patients with advanced melanoma, conceivably promoting progression of tumor metastasis [
64,
65].
3. Microbiome Impact on Unconventional T Cells in Cancer
In mucosal tissues a large proportion of unconventional T cells is present and, when exposed to microbial signals, they can activate an immediate response. Since these innate-like cells play a fundamental role in immune surveillance and response, it has been proposed a direct involvement of the microbiome in influencing their immune activities.
Microbiota exerts a role in regulating unconventional T cells starting from their development. A study conducted on mice kept in different conditions (germ-free mice, germ-free mice reconstituted with specific bacteria and mice housed in specific pathogen free environments) showed that they differed in TCR V7 iNKT frequencies and cytokine response to antigens [
66]. This led to the conclusion that intestinal microbes can affect iNKT cells’ phenotypes and functions, at least in mice.
In liver tumors, the microbiome dampens expression of the CXCL16 via modification of bile acid metabolism, preventing expansion of anti-tumor NKT cells [
67]. In colorectal cancer,
Fusobacterium nucleatum (
Fn) has been recently associated with an aberrant recruiting-activity of iNKT cells in colorectal cancer (CRC). iNKTs are induced to produce IL-17 and GM-CSF upon exposure to
Fn, thus promoting tumor infiltration of neutrophils (TANs) [
27]. Compared with αGalCer-primed iNKT, only
Fn-primed iNKT cells are able to both increase the survival rate of neutrophils and to induce their recruitment [
27]. Exerting a similar pro-tumor activity on iNKT cells,
Porphyromonas gingivalis (
Pg), an opportunistic oral pathogen previously associated with different inflammatory diseases and cancers, hampers the iNKT cell lytic machinery through increased expression of chitinase 3-like-1 protein (CHI3L1)[
28]. Thus,
Pg accelerates CRC progression in both humans and mice, impairing iNKT cytotoxic functions and promoting host tumor immune evasion.
The tissue localization of MAIT cells, similarly to what happens to iNKT cells, is critically influenced by the colonization with riboflavin-synthesizing bacteria within the first three weeks after birth[
4]. Various riboflavin derivatives produced by bacteria have been identified as MAITs ligands and the structural differences in these ligands can bring to a different MR1 binding and activation[
68].
Escherichia coli (
E. coli)
, Salmonella, Streptococcus, Mycobacterium have been identified as bacteria recognizing and activating MAIT cells [
69]. For instance, in female genital mucosa (FGT), MAIT cells stimulated with
E. coli displayed a distinct IL-17/IL-22 profile and have an important role in the immunological homeostasis and control of microbes at this site[
70]. Moreover, tumor-infiltrating MAIT cells in CRC are CD4
+ and Foxp3
+ and express high levels of CD39, which is an exhaustion indicator. Although
Fn is widely correlated with CRC development and progression, as also previously stressed with the recent studies conducted on iNKTs[
27], in this context it can exert a re-activating role on MAITs, in a TCR-dependent way, stimulating production of cytokines like IFNγ and TNFα[
71].
The relationship between γδ T cells and microbiota is not governed simply by the anatomical site of residency or the dominant effector function of the considered γδ T cell subset. Despite the presence of the intestinal microbiota, intestinal γδ T cells can be found in similar numbers in germ-free (GF) and specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice under healthy conditions[
72]. On the other side, the numbers of liver-resident γδ17 T cells were found to be decreased in mice kept under GF conditions, compared with in their SPF counterparts[
73]. In tumors, local γδ T cells can be responsible of disease onset and progression, as demonstrated by recent studies performed on lung adenocarcinoma. Stimulating IL-1β and IL-23 production by myeloid cells, the colonizing bacterial community activates lung-resident γδ T cells and provokes inflammation associated with lung cancer[
74]. As proof of this, germ-free or antibiotic treated mice were significantly protected from lung cancer development induced by Kras mutation and p53 loss [
74].
Overall, this growing body of evidence underscores the complex interplay between the microbiome and UC T cells, highlighting its profound impact, in both humans and mice, on immune regulation and disease progression in cancer.
4. Harnessing Unconventional T Cells for Cancer Treatment
The capability of UC T cells to rapidly respond to infections or tumor-associated changes via both TCR signaling and natural killer receptors (NKRs) activation makes them suitable candidates for alternative therapeutic strategies. In addition to their great plasticity and potent cytotoxic activity, they have a strongly reduced risk of inducing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and this implies they can be used allogeneically, solving several intrinsic problems related to adoptive cell therapy.
4.1. In Situ Activation and Adoptive Unconventional T Cells Transfer
The activation of NKT-mediated immune responses both through the treatment of αGC to IL-2/GM-CSF-cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells [
75] or to APCs [
76], then administered intravenously to patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC refractory to first-line chemotherapy, resulted to be well tolerated and prolonging the overall survival. In addition, a phase I clinical trial was performed of autologous in vitro expanded iNKT cells in stage IIIB–IV melanoma, bringing to an evident increased iNKT cells activity and correlated activation of other immune cells in some patients. This means that the iNKT cell therapy for advanced melanoma is feasible and can be potentially exploited or enhanced if considered also in combination with other therapies [
77].
The field of adoptive MAIT cells therapy has yet to be fully explored. For certain, they are completely lacking in alloreactive potential, as demonstrated by Tourret et al. [
78], and at the same time they can be easily expanded in vitro and are capable to traffic to tissues exerting potent effector functions. This constitutes a good starting point to get possible new therapeutic agents, which however would require a tight regulation due to the ubiquitous expression of MR1 and the consequent risk of a pathological over-activation of these cells [
79].
γδ T cells have been tested in different clinical trials, trying to obtain an anticancer effect mediated by these cells. Attempts to expand Vδ2
+ T cells directly in vivo, through the systemic administration of pamidronate or zoledronate in combination with IL-2, showed an objective response in few patients with prostate cancer, multiple myeloma and renal cell cancer[
80,
81,
82]. Moreover, in a study conducted by Wada et al., 2 patients out of 7 showed a reduction in the number of tumor cells in ascites associated to gastric cancer after intraperitoneal injection of expanded autologous Vδ2
+ T cells in combination with zoledronate [
83]. Thus, Vδ2
+ T cells-based immunotherapy is achievable and, overall, safe, but further studies are necessary to increase its efficacy.
DN T cells have also been studied as potential alternative immunotherapies. An example is the study by Lee et al., in 2019, where they demonstrated an in vitro donor-unrestricted cytotoxic activity of DNTs against various cancer types. It has also been observed a capability of these cells to enhance the survival of mice infused with a lethal dose of EBV-LCL and to reduce leukemia engraftment in xenograft models, making them an alternative therapeutic solution worth exploring [
84].
4.2. CAR-Unconventional T Cells
Also engineering strategies can be applied, in fact both preclinical and clinical studies showed potent antitumor activity and wide tumor-targeting potential of CAR-iNKT cells. A recent phase I clinical trial using autologous GD2-targeting IL-15-enhanced CAR-iNKT cells to treat pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma showed promising antitumor effects [
85]. Moreover, given the iNKTs’ unique feature of recognizing the non-polymorphic molecule CD1d, thus preventing the induction of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), researchers developed CAR-iNKT cells from allogeneic PBMCs. They were dually targeting CD1d to be activated and CD19
+ chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells to exert their cytotoxic antitumor activity [
86]. The high cytotoxicity against target cells and the lack of GvHD risk make also MAIT cells promising potential candidates for off-the-shelf CAR-T products. The first demonstration of the feasibility of using CAR-engineered MAIT cells against specific targets was given in 2022 by Dogan et al., who optimized a protocol of expansion and engineering of anti-CD19 and anti-Her2 CAR-MAIT cells. Respectively, these cells resulted highly efficient in killing T2, as well as Nalm6 cell lines (expressing CD19 on their surface), and Her2
+ MDA-231 breast cancer cell line, and both of them recorded a higher cytotoxicity than the conventional CAR-T cells [
87].
Moreover, experiments to generate CAR-γδ T cells were done. An example is this study by Capsomidis et al. [
88], who generated GD2-targeting CAR- γδ T cells, getting an efficient expansion and an important cytotoxic activity against human neuroblastoma cell lines LAN1 and SK-N-SH. Moreover, the authors of this study hypothesized that part of the antitumor activity exerted by these cells could be due to their multifunctional nature, since they can work also as antigen presenting cells and potentially prolong the intratumoral immune response. According to this hypothesis, the engineered γδ T cells showed capability of migrating toward tumor cells and of antigen cross presentation, confirming the potential therapeutic advantages behind these cells [
88].
To optimize next-generation unconventional T cell therapies, a viable approach is to explore the synergistic potential of bispecific T cell engagers.
4.3. Bispecific T Cell Engagers (BiTEs)
Different from natural antibodies, BiTEs can redirect T cells to specific tumor antigens and activate T cells. Because of this, they hold great promises for cancer treatment, but face challenges due to the induction of cytokine release syndrome and the target off-tumor toxicity. Since both peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating Vγ9Vδ2-T cells positively correlate with clinical outcome in several malignancies [
89,
90,
91], as well as iNKT cells, which trigger a bidirectional crosstalk with APCs, thus promoting a cytotoxic lysis of CD1d
+ tumor cells [
89,
92], Lameris et al. in their studies demonstrated a successful engagement of both these cell types by using a BiTE. In particular, they projected a BiTE with transpacific properties, engaging Vγ9Vδ2-T cells and iNKTs to CD1d
+ tumors, to trigger a strong pro-inflammatory reaction mediated by these cells, when recruited close to the tumor[
93].
Similarly, a MAIT engager was developed in the context of breast cancer, to rapidly activate and allow proliferation and degranulation of MAIT cells, leading to an efficient killing of HER2
+ cancer cells, without triggering secondary activation of other cell types like regulatory T cells and other CD4/CD8 subsets. This study shows MAIT cells as a promising approach for the treatment of solid tumors, and together with the unconventional T cells contributing to the enlargement of the therapeutic window [
94].
In conclusion, the diverse therapeutic potential of UC T cells offers promising alternatives for cancer immunotherapy. However, while advances in adoptive cell transfer, CAR-T engineering and BiTEs have shown promising clinical results, further research is needed to optimize their efficacy and safety. Combining UC T cell-based therapies with other strategies, such as bispecific engagers, can improve tumor targeting and enhance immune responses, potentially transforming cancer treatment into a more precise and effective approach.
5. Conclusions
Unconventional T cells can play both pro- and anti-tumoral roles, influenced by the environment, especially the microbial one. Microbiome impacts UC T cells by modulating their development, phenotypes, and immune responses, which can influence cancer progression and immune evasion. The plastic nature of these cells makes them promising therapeutic targets or agents, and in fact they are being explored through various strategies, including adoptive transfer, in situ activation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell engineering and enhancement of their tumor-specific killing activity by bispecific T cell engagers administration.
Despite their therapeutic potential, further research is needed to optimize UC T cell therapies. Some tumors, especially those associated with the gastrointestinal tract, showed poorly durable responses to these types of therapies, probably because of the immunosuppressive TME and the heterogeneity of target molecules. Thus, an increase in safety of UC T cells-based therapies is necessary, together with an integration of other strategies to improve tumor targeting and immune responses in cancer treatment. In addition to this, advanced neoantigen prediction and optimal UC T cells activation targets could facilitate the clinical application of these cells as therapies in GI cancers, in order to amplify the treatment landscape.
Funding
This work was made possible thanks to the financial support of Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Investigator Grant- IG 2019 22923 to FF). This work has received funding from the European Union - NextGenerationEU through the Italian Ministry of University and Research under the [PNRR - M4C2-I1.3 Project PE_00000019 “HEAL ITALIA”].
Conflicts of Interest
the authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- J. D. Haas et al., ‘Development of Interleukin-17-Producing γδ T Cells Is Restricted to a Functional Embryonic Wave’, Immunity, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48–59, Jul. 2012. [CrossRef]
- E. Leeansyah, L. Loh, D. F. Nixon, and J. K. Sandberg, ‘Acquisition of innate-like microbial reactivity in mucosal tissues during human fetal MAIT-cell development’, Nat Commun, vol. 5, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef]
- K. Narayan et al., ‘Intrathymic programming of effector fates in three molecularly distinct γδ T cell subtypes’, Nat Immunol, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 511–518, May 2012. [CrossRef]
- M. G. Constantinides et al., ‘MAIT cells are imprinted by the microbiota in early life and promote tissue repair’, Science (1979), vol. 366, no. 6464, Oct. 2019. [CrossRef]
- P. Tieppo et al., ‘The human fetal thymus generates invariant effector γδ T cells’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 217, no. 3, Mar. 2020. [CrossRef]
- E. N. Katsnelson et al., ‘Dysfunctional states of unconventional T-cell subsets in cancer’, Jan. 01, 2024, Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
- Z. Lukasik, D. Elewaut, and K. Venken, ‘Mait cells come to the rescue in cancer immunotherapy?’, Cancers (Basel), vol. 12, no. 2, Feb. 2020. [CrossRef]
- D. T. Cogswell, L. Gapin, H. M. Tobin, M. D. McCarter, and R. P. Tobin, ‘MAIT cells: Partners or enemies in cancer immunotherapy?’, Apr. 01, 2021, MDPI AG. [CrossRef]
- A. J. Corbett, W. Awad, H. Wang, and Z. Chen, ‘Antigen Recognition by MR1-Reactive T Cells; MAIT Cells, Metabolites, and Remaining Mysteries’, Aug. 27, 2020, Frontiers Media S.A. [CrossRef]
- M. Salio et al., ‘Activation of Human Mucosal-Associated Invariant T Cells Induces CD40L-Dependent Maturation of Monocyte-Derived and Primary Dendritic Cells’, The Journal of Immunology, vol. 199, no. 8, pp. 2631–2638, Oct. 2017. [CrossRef]
- N. M. Provine et al., ‘MAIT cell activation augments adenovirus vector vaccine immunogenicity’, Science (1979), vol. 371, no. 6528, Jan. 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. E. Ussher et al., ‘CD161++CD8+ T cells, including the MAIT cell subset, are specifically activated by IL-12+IL-18 in a TCR-independent manner’, Eur J Immunol, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 195–203, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef]
- E. V. Petley et al., ‘MAIT cells regulate NK cell-mediated tumor immunity’, Nat Commun, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2021. [CrossRef]
- N. A. Gherardin et al., ‘Enumeration, functional responses and cytotoxic capacity of MAIT cells in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma’, Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2018. [CrossRef]
- E. J. Won et al., ‘Clinical relevance of circulating mucosal-associated invariant T cell levels and their anti-cancer activity in patients with mucosal-associated cancer’, 2016. [Online]. Available: www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget.
- M. Duan et al., ‘Activated and exhausted MAIT cells foster disease progression and indicate poor outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma’, Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3304–3316, Jun. 2019. [CrossRef]
- S. Li et al., ‘Human Tumor-Infiltrating MAIT Cells Display Hallmarks of Bacterial Antigen Recognition in Colorectal Cancer’, Cell Rep Med, vol. 1, no. 3, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Yan et al., ‘MAIT cells promote tumor initiation, growth and metastases via tumor MR1’, Cancer Discov, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 124–141, Jan. 2020. [CrossRef]
- D. I. Godfrey, A. P. Uldrich, J. Mccluskey, J. Rossjohn, and D. B. Moody, ‘The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells’, Oct. 20, 2015, Nature Publishing Group. [CrossRef]
- O. Lantz and A. Bendelac, ‘An Invariant T Cell Receptor ~x Chain Is Used by a Unique Subset of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-specific CD4 + and CD4-8-T Cells in Mice and Humans’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 3, Sep. 1994, [Online]. Available: http://rupress.org/jem/article-pdf/180/3/1097/1676175/1097.pdf.
- T. Kawano et al., ‘CD1d-Restricted and TCR-Mediated Activation of Vα14 NKT Cells by Glycosylceramides’, Science (1979), vol. 278, no. 5343, pp. 1626–1629, Nov. 1997.
- E. Kobayashi, K. Motoki, T. Uchida, H. Fukushima, and Y. Koezuka, ‘KRN7000, a novel immunomodulator, and its antitumor activities’, Oncol Res, vol. 7, no. 10–11, pp. 529–534, Jan. 1995.
- D. Krijgsman, M. Hokland, and P. J. K. Kuppen, ‘The role of natural killer T cells in cancer-A phenotypical and functional approach’, Feb. 27, 2018, Frontiers Media S.A. [CrossRef]
- M. Nakui et al., ‘Potentiation of antitumor effect of NKT cell ligand, α-galactosylceramide by combination with IL-12 on lung metastasis of malignant melanoma cells 1’, 2000.
- Q. Yi et al., ‘scRNA-Seq and imaging mass cytometry analyses unveil iNKT cells-mediated anti-tumor immunity in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis’, Cancer Lett, vol. 561, May 2023. [CrossRef]
- F. Gorini et al., ‘Invariant NKT cells contribute to chronic lymphocytic leukemia surveillance and prognosis’, Blood, vol. 129, no. 26, pp. 3440–3451, Jun. 2017. [CrossRef]
- G. Lattanzi et al., ‘iNKT cell-neutrophil crosstalk promotes colorectal cancer pathogenesis’, Mucosal Immunol, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 326–340, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Díaz-Basabe et al., ‘Porphyromonas gingivalis fuels colorectal cancer through CHI3L1-mediated iNKT cell-driven immune evasion’, Gut Microbes, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Y. Hu et al., ‘γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy’, Dec. 01, 2023, Springer Nature. [CrossRef]
- D. Vermijlen, D. Gatti, A. Kouzeli, T. Rus, and M. Eberl, ‘γδ T cell responses: How many ligands will it take till we know?’, Dec. 01, 2018, Elsevier Ltd. [CrossRef]
- B. Silva-Santos, S. Mensurado, and S. B. Coffelt, ‘γδ T cells: pleiotropic immune effectors with therapeutic potential in cancer’, Jul. 01, 2019, Nature Publishing Group. [CrossRef]
- B. E. Willcox and C. R. Willcox, ‘γδ TCR ligands: the quest to solve a 500-million-year-old mystery’, Nat Immunol, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 121–128, Feb. 2019. [CrossRef]
- C. Peters, R. Häsler, D. Wesch, and D. Kabelitz, ‘Human Vδ2 T cells are a major source of interleukin-9’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 113, no. 44, pp. 12520–12525, Nov. 2016. [CrossRef]
- N. Caccamo et al., ‘Differentiation, phenotype, and function of interleukin-17-producing human vγ9vδ2 T cells’, Blood, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 129–138, Jul. 2011. [CrossRef]
- D. Wesch, A. Glatzel, and D. Kabelitz, ‘Differentiation of resting human peripheral blood γδ T cells toward Th1- or Th2-phenotype’, Cell Immunol, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 110–117, Sep. 2001. [CrossRef]
- J. Guo et al., ‘γδ T cell antigen receptor polyspecificity enables T cell responses to a broad range of immune challenges’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 121, no. 4, 2024. [CrossRef]
- C. Peters, H. H. Oberg, D. Kabelitz, and D. Wesch, ‘Phenotype and regulation of immunosuppressive Vδ2-expressing γδ T cells’, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1943–1960, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Y. Mao et al., ‘A new effect of IL-4 on human γδ cells: Promoting regulatory Vδ1 T cells via IL-10 production and inhibiting function of Vδ2 T cells’, Cell Mol Immunol, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 217–228, Mar. 2016. [CrossRef]
- K. Wang et al., ‘Interleukin-17 receptor a signaling in transformed enterocytes promotes early colorectal tumorigenesis’, Immunity, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1052–1063, Dec. 2014. [CrossRef]
- F. Housseau et al., ‘Redundant Innate and Adaptive Sources of IL17 Production Drive Colon Tumorigenesis’, Cancer Res, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 2115–2124, Apr. 2016. [CrossRef]
- S. B. Coffelt et al., ‘IL-17-producing γδ T cells and neutrophils conspire to promote breast cancer metastasis’, Nature, vol. 522, no. 7556, pp. 345–348, Jun. 2015. [CrossRef]
- S. Ma et al., ‘IL-17A produced by γδ T cells promotes tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma’, Cancer Res, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 1969–1982, Apr. 2014. [CrossRef]
- L. Benevides et al., ‘IL17 promotes mammary tumor progression by changing the behavior of tumor cells and eliciting tumorigenic neutrophils recruitment’, Cancer Res, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 3788–3799, Sep. 2015. [CrossRef]
- M. Rei et al., ‘Murine CD27(-) Vγ6(+) γδ T cells producing IL-17A promote ovarian cancer growth via mobilization of protumor small peritoneal macrophages’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 111, no. 34, Aug. 2014. [CrossRef]
- J. Ye et al., ‘Specific recruitment of γδ regulatory T cells in human breast cancer’, Cancer Res, vol. 73, no. 20, pp. 6137–6148, Oct. 2013. [CrossRef]
- J. Yang and R. A. Weinberg, ‘Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: At the Crossroads of Development and Tumor Metastasis’, Jun. 10, 2008. [CrossRef]
- J. H. Park and H. K. Lee, ‘Function of γδ T cells in tumor immunology and their application to cancer therapy’, Mar. 01, 2021, Springer Nature. [CrossRef]
- S. Nguyen et al., ‘Vδ2 T cells are associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with bladder cancer and their tumor reactivity can be boosted by BCG and zoledronate treatments’, J Immunother Cancer, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2022. [CrossRef]
- D. Pawlik-Gwozdecka, M. Zieliński, J. Sakowska, E. Adamkiewicz-Drozyńska, P. Trzonkowski, and M. Niedźwiecki, ‘CD8+ γδ T cells correlate with favorable prognostic factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia’, 2021, Termedia Publishing House Ltd. [CrossRef]
- A. Cordova et al., ‘Characterization of Human γδ T Lymphocytes Infiltrating Primary Malignant Melanomas’, PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 11, Nov. 2012. [CrossRef]
- R. Uchida et al., ‘γδT cells kill myeloma cells by sensing mevalonate metabolites and ICAM-1 molecules on cell surface’, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 613–618, Mar. 2007. [CrossRef]
- C. Niu et al., ‘In vitro analysis of the proliferative capacity and cytotoxic effects of ex vivo induced natural killer cells, cytokine-induced killer cells, and gamma-delta T cells’, BMC Immunol, vol. 16, no. 1, Oct. 2015. [CrossRef]
- E. Viey et al., ‘Phosphostim-Activated T Cells Kill Autologous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma 1’, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://journals.aai.org/jimmunol/article-pdf/174/3/1338/1196186/1338.pdf.
- C. Mao et al., ‘Tumor-activated TCRγδ+ T cells from gastric cancer patients induce the antitumor immune response of TCRαβ+ T cells via their antigen-presenting cell-like effects’, J Immunol Res, vol. 2014, 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. E. Schad et al., ‘Tumor-induced double positive T cells display distinct lineage commitment mechanisms and functions’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 219, no. 6, Jun. 2022. [CrossRef]
- T. Parrot et al., ‘Transcriptomic features of tumour-infiltrating CD4lowCD8high double positive αβ T cells in melanoma’, Sci Rep, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Desfrançois et al., ‘Double positive CD4CD8 αβ T cells: A new tumor-reactive population in human melanomas’, PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2010. [CrossRef]
- P. Bohner et al., ‘Double positive CD4+CD8+ T cells are enriched in urological cancers and favor T helper-2 polarization’, Front Immunol, vol. 10, no. MAR, 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. B. Lee, H. Kang, L. Fang, C. D’Souza, O. Adeyi, and L. Zhang, ‘Developing allogeneic double-negative T cells as a novel off-the-shelf adoptive cellular therapy for cancer’, Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2241–2253, Apr. 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. Yao et al., ‘Human double negative T cells target lung cancer via ligand-dependent mechanisms that can be enhanced by IL-15’, J Immunother Cancer, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- Y. Lu et al., ‘Double-negative T Cells Inhibit Proliferation and Invasion of Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells in Co-culture’, Anticancer Res, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 5911–5918, 2019. [CrossRef]
- X. Chen, D. Wang, and X. Zhu, ‘Application of double-negative T cells in haematological malignancies: recent progress and future directions’, Dec. 01, 2022, BioMed Central Ltd. [CrossRef]
- X. C. Liu, K. N. Sun, H. R. Zhu, Y. L. Dai, and X. F. Liu, ‘Diagnostic and prognostic value of double-negative T cells in colorectal cancer’, Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 14, Jul. 2024. [CrossRef]
- V. Vallacchi et al., ‘Transcriptional profiling of melanoma sentinel nodes identify patients with poor outcome and reveal an association of CD30+ T lymphocytes with progression’, Cancer Res, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 130–140, Jan. 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. R. Greenplate et al., ‘Computational immune monitoring reveals abnormal double-negative T cells present across human tumor types’, Cancer Immunol Res, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 86–99, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- G. Wingender et al., ‘Intestinal microbes affect phenotypes and functions of invariant natural killer T cells in mice’, Gastroenterology, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 418–428, 2012. [CrossRef]
- M. Nakui et al., ‘Potentiation of antitumor effect of NKT cell ligand, α-galactosylceramide by combination with IL-12 on lung metastasis of malignant melanoma cells 1’, 2000.
- W. Awad et al., ‘The molecular basis underpinning the potency and specificity of MAIT cell antigens’, Nat Immunol, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 400–411, Apr. 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. F. Oh, D.-J. Jung, and E. Choi, ‘Gut Microbiota-Derived Unconventional T Cell Ligands: Contribution to Host Immune Modulation’, Immunohorizons, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 476–487, Jul. 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Gibbs et al., ‘MAIT cells reside in the female genital mucosa and are biased towards IL-17 and IL-22 production in response to bacterial stimulation’, Mucosal Immunol, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–45, Jan. 2017. [CrossRef]
- S. Li et al., ‘Human Tumor-Infiltrating MAIT Cells Display Hallmarks of Bacterial Antigen Recognition in Colorectal Cancer’, Cell Rep Med, vol. 1, no. 3, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- F. Rampoldi and I. Prinz, ‘Three Layers of Intestinal γδ T Cells Talk Different Languages With the Microbiota’, Mar. 24, 2022, Frontiers Media S.A. [CrossRef]
- P. H. Papotto, B. Yilmaz, and B. Silva-Santos, ‘Crosstalk between γδ T cells and the microbiota’, Sep. 01, 2021, Nature Research. [CrossRef]
- C. Jin et al., ‘Commensal Microbiota Promote Lung Cancer Development via γδ T Cells’, Cell, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 998-1013.e16, Feb. 2019. [CrossRef]
- S. Motohashi et al., ‘A Phase I-II Study of α-Galactosylceramide-Pulsed IL-2/GM-CSF-Cultured Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer’, The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 2492–2501, Feb. 2009. [CrossRef]
- T. Toyoda et al., ‘Phase II study of α-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer’, J Immunother Cancer, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. A. Exley et al., ‘Adoptive transfer of invariant NKT cells as immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: A phase I clinical trial’, Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 3510–3519, Jul. 2017. [CrossRef]
- M. Tourret et al., ‘Human MAIT cells are devoid of alloreactive potential: prompting their use as universal cells for adoptive immune therapy’, J Immunother Cancer, vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Vacchini, A. Chancellor, J. Spagnuolo, L. Mori, and G. De Libero, ‘MR1-Restricted T Cells Are Unprecedented Cancer Fighters’, Apr. 28, 2020, Frontiers Media S.A. [CrossRef]
- V. Kunzmann et al., ‘Tumor-promoting Versus Tumor-antagonizing Roles of γδ T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy’, Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 205–213, Feb. 2012. [CrossRef]
- M. Wilhelm et al., ‘T cells for immune therapy of patients with lymphoid malignancies’, vol. 102, pp. 200–206, 2003. [CrossRef]
- F. Dieli et al., ‘Targeting human γδ T cells with zoledronate and interleukin-2 for immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer’, Cancer Res, vol. 67, no. 15, pp. 7450–7457, Aug. 2007. [CrossRef]
- I. Wada et al., ‘Intraperitoneal injection of in vitro expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells together with zoledronate for the treatment of malignant ascites due to gastric cancer’, Cancer Med, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 362–375, Apr. 2014. [CrossRef]
- J. B. Lee, H. Kang, L. Fang, C. D’Souza, O. Adeyi, and L. Zhang, ‘Developing allogeneic double-negative T cells as a novel off-the-shelf adoptive cellular therapy for cancer’, Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2241–2253, Apr. 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. Heczey et al., ‘Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: updated phase 1 trial interim results’, Nat Med, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1379–1388, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Rotolo et al., ‘Enhanced Anti-lymphoma Activity of CAR19-iNKT Cells Underpinned by Dual CD19 and CD1d Targeting’, Cancer Cell, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 596-610.e11, Oct. 2018. [CrossRef]
- M. Dogan et al., ‘Engineering Human MAIT Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Cancer Immunotherapy’, The Journal of Immunology, vol. 209, no. 8, pp. 1523–1531, Oct. 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Capsomidis et al., ‘Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered Human Gamma Delta T Cells: Enhanced Cytotoxicity with Retention of Cross Presentation’, Molecular Therapy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 354–365, Feb. 2018. [CrossRef]
- D. I. Godfrey, J. Le Nours, D. M. Andrews, A. P. Uldrich, and J. Rossjohn, ‘Unconventional T Cell Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy’, Mar. 20, 2018, Cell Press. [CrossRef]
- Z. Sebestyen, I. Prinz, J. Déchanet-Merville, B. Silva-Santos, and J. Kuball, ‘Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies’, Mar. 01, 2020, Nature Research. [CrossRef]
- M. Tosolini et al., ‘Assessment of tumor-infiltrating TCRVγ9Vδ2 γδ lymphocyte abundance by deconvolution of human cancers microarrays’, Oncoimmunology, vol. 6, no. 3, Mar. 2017. [CrossRef]
- R. M. McEwen-Smith, M. Salio, and V. Cerundolo, ‘The regulatory role of invariant NKT Cells in tumor immunity’, Cancer Immunol Res, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 425–435, May 2015. [CrossRef]
- R. Lameris et al., ‘A bispecific T cell engager recruits both type 1 NKT and Vγ9Vδ2-T cells for the treatment of CD1d-expressing hematological malignancies’, Cell Rep Med, vol. 4, no. 3, Mar. 2023. [CrossRef]
- S. E. Plyte et al., ‘Abstract 6708: MAIT engagers: Bispecific antibody-mediated redirection of mucosal associated invariant T cells to treat solid tumors’, Cancer Res, vol. 84, no. 6_Supplement, pp. 6708–6708, Mar. 2024. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).