Submitted:
17 March 2025
Posted:
18 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Study Area, Methods, and Data Sources
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
- (i)
- Area: For classifying the PUGSs according to their area, we defined three categories: Small PUGSs (with an area greater than 0 and up to 100 m2), Medium PUGSs (with an area greater than 100 m2 and up to 10,000 m2), and Large PUGSs (with an area greater than 10,000 m2). In this research, we focused on selecting only the PUGSs categorized as "Large" (i.e., with an area greater than 10,000 m2). In a city like Sanandaj, large green spaces have a substantial impact on the overall greenness, making them representative for studying urban greenness. By evaluating these large parks, we can derive meaningful insights into the changes in greenness across the entire city.
- (ii)
- Function of Parks: Although the SDUP designates several large lots (larger than 10,000 m2) as parks, expert evaluation determined that some of these spaces should not be classified as PUGSs in this study. This exclusion was due to two main reasons: first, the functions of certain "parks" differ significantly, such as those designated as cemeteries; second, some of these areas lack vegetation (trees or grass), making them more similar to vacant lots than functional green spaces.
2.3. Satellite Data
2.4. Extracting NDVI Maps
2.5. Defining Dynamic and Static Borders for PUGSs
2.6. Visual Language for Tracking Changes in Greenness
2.7. Classifying UGSs to Analyze Urban Greenery
3. Results
3.1. Monthly Mean NDVI of PUGSs in Sanandaj (2019-2023)
3.1.1. Monthly Mean NDVI of PUGSs Based on Irrigation System Type
3.1.2. Monthly Mean NDVI of PUGSs According to Major Landscape Types
3.2. Changes in Greenness of PUGSs
3.2.1. Seasonal Changes in Greenness of PUGSs Based on Irrigation Type
3.2.2. Seasonal Changes in Greenness of PUGSs Based on Major Landscape
3.3. Anomaly Map of PUGSs
4. Discussion
5. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement & Software Citation
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UN (2018) World population prospects: The 2018 revision, New York, USA: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.
- Sun, Y.; Augenbroe, G. Urban heat island effect on energy application studies of office buildings. Energy and Buildings 2014, 77, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaisi, S.; Alizadeh, H.; Lotfi, W.; Mohammadi, S. Developing the ecological footprint assessment for a university campus, the component-based method. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Huang, Y.; Sha, A. A review of eco-friendly functional road materials. Construction and Building Materials 2018, 191, 1082–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Sun, T.; Feng, Q. Dynamic spatial spillover effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in China considering the inertia characteristics of environmental pollution. Sustainable Cities and Society 2020, 53, 101903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J. D.; Hutchins, M. The impacts of urbanisation and climate change on urban flooding and urban water quality: A review of the evidence concerning the United Kingdom. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 2017, 12, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of cleaner production 2019, 237, 117649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woldesemayat, E. M.; Genovese, P. V. Monitoring urban expansion and urban green spaces change in Addis Ababa: directional and zonal analysis integrated with landscape expansion index. Forests 2021, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, T.; Mayer, A. L.; Shuster, W. D.; Tian, G. The hydrologic role of urban green space in mitigating flooding (Luohe, China). Sustainability 2018, 10, 3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, H.; McLaughlin, D.; Shao, Y.; van Eerden, B.; Ranganathan, S.; Deng, X. Remotely-sensed evapotranspiration for informed urban forest management. Landscape and Urban Planning 2021, 210, 104069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Chen, W.; Peng, C. Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling 2014, 291, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaiah, M.; Avtar, R. Urban green spaces and their need in cities of rapidly urbanizing India: A review. Urban science 2019, 3, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H. W.; Kim, J.-H.; Li, W.; Yang, P.; Cao, Y. Exploring the impact of green space health on runoff reduction using NDVI. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2017, 28, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.; Saphores, J.-D. M.; Gillespie, T. W. A comparison of the economic benefits of urban green spaces estimated with NDVI and with high-resolution land cover data. Landscape and Urban Planning 2015, 133, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Xiang, H.; Di, N.; Mao, Z.; Hou, J.; Liu, X.; Huo, W.; Yang, B.; Dong, G.; Wang, C. Association between residential greenness and sleep quality in Chinese rural population. Environment International 2020, 145, 106100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kweon, B.-S.; Ellis, C. D.; Lee, J.; Jacobs, K. The link between school environments and student academic performance. Urban forestry & urban greening 2017, 23, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka, R. H. Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landscape and urban planning 2010, 97, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nouri, H.; Borujeni, S. C.; Hoekstra, A. Y. The blue water footprint of urban green spaces: An example for Adelaide, Australia. Landscape and urban planning 2019, 190, 103613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, D.; Rahman, A.; Paul, S.; Kundu, A. Spatial and temporal trends of urban green spaces: an assessment using hyper-temporal NDVI datasets. Geocarto International 2022, 37, 7983–8003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anguluri, R.; Narayanan, P. Role of green space in urban planning: Outlook towards smart cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2017, 25, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
- Aryal, J.; Sitaula, C.; Aryal, S. NDVI threshold-based urban green space mapping from sentinel-2A at the Local Governmental Area (LGA) level of victoria, Australia. Land 2022, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Zhong, C.; Jing, C.; Li, Y.; Cao, B.; Cheng, Q. Rapid mapping and annual dynamic evaluation of quality of urban green spaces on google earth engine. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2021, 10, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, H.; Li, Z.; Guo, H.; Chen, H.; Luo, P. Urban green space planning based on remote sensing and geographic information systems. Remote Sensing 2022, 14, 4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, B. A.; Coutts, A. M.; Livesley, S. J.; Harris, R. J.; Hunter, A. M.; Williams, N. S. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and urban planning 2015, 134, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhao, S. Valuing urban green spaces in mitigating climate change: A city-wide estimate of aboveground carbon stored in urban green spaces of China's Capital. Global change biology 2019, 25, 1717–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nouri, H.; Beecham, S.; Kazemi, F.; Hassanli, A. M. A review of ET measurement techniques for estimating the water requirements of urban landscape vegetation. Urban Water Journal 2013, 10, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, B.; Tong, C.; Liu, P.; Wang, H.; Hong, Y. A methodology to monitor urban expansion and green space change using a time series of multi-sensor SPOT and Sentinel-2A images. Remote Sensing 2019, 11, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowe, P.; Mutanga, O.; Dube, T. Advancements in the remote sensing of landscape pattern of urban green spaces and vegetation fragmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2021, 42, 3797–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neyns, R.; Canters, F. Mapping of urban vegetation with high-resolution remote sensing: A review. Remote sensing 2022, 14, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonzo, M.; Bookhagen, B.; Roberts, D. A. Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion. Remote sensing of environment 2014, 148, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettorelli, N. The normalized difference vegetation index; Oxford University Press 2013, USA,.
- Duro, D. C.; Coops, N. C.; Wulder, M. A.; Han, T. Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing. Progress in physical geography 2007, 31, 235–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdy, O. Using remote sensing techniques to assess the changes in the rate of urban green spaces in Egypt: a case study of greater Cairo. International Design Journal 2022, 12, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fung, T.; Siu, W. Environmental quality and its changes, an analysis using NDVI. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21, 1011–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettorelli, N.; Vik, J. O.; Mysterud, A.; Gaillard, J.-M.; Tucker, C. J.; Stenseth, N. C. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in ecology & evolution 2005, 20, 503–510. [Google Scholar]
- Alcaraz-Segura, D.; Cabello, J.; Paruelo, J. M.; Delibes, M. Use of descriptors of ecosystem functioning for monitoring a national park network: a remote sensing approach. Environmental Management 2009, 43, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Peng, D.; Soudani, K.; Siebicke, L.; Gough, C. M.; Arain, M. A.; Bohrer, G.; Lafleur, P. M.; Peichl, M.; Gonsamo, A. Land surface phenology derived from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at global FLUXNET sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2017, 233, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani-Noor, N.; Feistkorn, D. Monitoring growth status of winter oilseed rape by NDVI and NDYI derived from UAV-based Red–Green–Blue imagery. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, N.; Nouri, H.; Didan, K.; Barreto-Muñoz, A.; Chavoshi Borujeni, S.; Salemi, H.; Opp, C.; Siebert, S.; Nagler, P. Estimating actual evapotranspiration over croplands using vegetation index methods and dynamic harvested area. Remote Sensing 2021, 13, 5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hüttich*, C.; Herold, M.; Schmullius, C.; Egorov, V.; Bartalev, S. Indicators of Northern Eurasia's land-cover change trends from SPOT-VEGETATION time-series analysis 1998–2005. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 28, 4199–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomasella, J.; Vieira, R. M. S. P.; Barbosa, A. A.; Rodriguez, D. A.; de Oliveira Santana, M.; Sestini, M. F. Desertification trends in the Northeast of Brazil over the period 2000–2016. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2018, 73, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aburas, M. M.; Abdullah, S. H.; Ramli, M. F.; Ash’aari, Z. H. Measuring land cover change in Seremban, Malaysia using NDVI index. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2015, 30, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutti, P. R.; Lúcio, P. S.; Dubreuil, V.; Bezerra, B. G. NDVI time series stochastic models for the forecast of vegetation dynamics over desertification hotspots. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2020, 41, 2759–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyamekye, C.; Schönbrodt-Stitt, S.; Amekudzi, L. K.; Zoungrana, B. J. B.; Thiel, M. Usage of MODIS NDVI to evaluate the effect of soil and water conservation measures on vegetation in Burkina Faso. Land Degradation & Development 2021, 32, 7–19. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.; Tang, L.; Hupy, J. P.; Wang, Y.; Shao, G. A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. Journal of Forestry Research 2021, 32, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Motesharrei, S. Spatial and temporal patterns of global NDVI trends: correlations with climate and human factors. Remote Sensing 2015, 7, 13233–13250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, F.; Smith, C. L.; Cavan, G. A combined approach to classifying land surface cover of urban domestic gardens using citizen science data and high resolution image analysis. Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartling, S.; Sagan, V.; Sidike, P.; Maimaitijiang, M.; Carron, J. Urban tree species classification using a WorldView-2/3 and LiDAR data fusion approach and deep learning. Sensors 2019, 19, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Yang, J.; Jiang, P. Assessing impacts of urban form on landscape structure of urban green spaces in China using Landsat images based on Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiee, R.; Mahiny, A. S.; Khorasani, N. Assessment of changes in urban green spaces of Mashad city using satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2009, 11, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chun, B.; Guldmann, J.-M. Impact of greening on the urban heat island: Seasonal variations and mitigation strategies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2018, 71, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, F.; Bazgeer, S.; Kalehbasti, P. R.; Oskoue, E. A.; Haghighat, M.; Kalehbasti, P. R. New climatic zones in Iran: a comparative study of different empirical methods and clustering technique. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- General Census of Population and Housing, Statistical Center of Iran 2020, Iran.
- Velastegui-Montoya, A.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Rivera-Torres, H.; Sadeck, L.; Adami, M. Google Earth Engine: a global analysis and future trends. Remote Sensing 2023, 15, 3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Hai, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Vandansambuu, B.; Ning, X.; Chen, D. Spatial and temporal changes in vegetation cover in the three north protection forest project area supported by GEE cloud platform. Forests 2023, 14, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GEE Google Earth Engine. 2023. Available online: https://earthengine.google.com/ (accessed on 3 May 2023).
- ESA, Application of Sentinel-2. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-2 (accessed on 24 December 2024).
- QGIS Quantum Geographic Information System. 2023. Available online: http://www.qgis.org (accessed on 8 October 2024).
- Furberg, D.; Ban, Y.; Mörtberg, U. Monitoring urban green infrastructure changes and impact on habitat connectivity using high-resolution satellite data. Remote Sensing 2020, 12, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pouya, S.; Aghlmand, M. Evaluation of urban green space per capita with new remote sensing and geographic information system techniques and the importance of urban green space during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental monitoring and assessment 2022, 194, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vulova, S.; Rocha, A. D.; Meier, F.; Nouri, H.; Schulz, C.; Soulsby, C.; Tetzlaff, D.; Kleinschmit, B. City-wide, high-resolution mapping of evapotranspiration to guide climate-resilient planning. Remote Sensing of Environment 2023, 287, 113487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Yao, X. A.; Sun, R.; Chen, L. Effect of urban green patterns on surface urban cool islands and its seasonal variations. Urban forestry & urban greening 2014, 13, 646–654. [Google Scholar]
- Farinati, S.; Betto, A.; Palumbo, F.; Scariolo, F.; Vannozzi, A.; Barcaccia, G. The new green challenge in urban planning: The right genetics in the right place. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Feb | 6 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Mar | 7 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 3 |
| Apr | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| May | 7 | 10 | 11 | 6 | 6 |
| Jun | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Jul | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Aug | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Sep | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| Oct | 9 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| Nov | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| Dec | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| Total | 102 | 96 | 111 | 96 | 102 |
| 507 | |||||
| Major landscape | MG | 9 (45%) |
| MT | 11 (55%) | |
| Irrigation system | SIS | 5 (25%) |
| FIS | 15 (75%) | |
| Total | 20 (100%) | |
| Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 102 | 126.9 | 49.2 | 78.8 |
| 2020 | 68.7 | 125.2 | 37.2 | 63.5 |
| 2021 | 51 | 67.8 | 46.3 | 59.5 |
| 2022 | 28.5 | 31.5 | 20.9 | 19 |
| 2023 | 0.9 | 81.8 | 19.5 | 21.7 |
| Total | 250.2 | 351.4 | 163.5 | 220.8 |
| PUGS | MG/MT | FIS/SIS | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest parks | Keshavarz | MT | SIS | 6.9 | - 93.3 | - 82.2 | - 70.1 |
| Neshteman | MT | SIS | - 5.8 | - 61.7 | - 73.7 | - 45.2 | |
| Pir Gharib | MT | SIS | 14 | - 62.7 | - 73.8 | - 46.4 | |
| Rusi | MT | SIS | 0 | - 54 | - 55.1 | - 35.9 | |
| Toos Nowzar | MT | SIS | 3.8 | - 67.2 | - 73.1 | - 21.4 | |
| Urban parks | Amiriyeh | MT | FIS | 8.6 | - 7.7 | - 10.9 | - 7.3 |
| Azadegan | MG | FIS | 0 | 0 | - 5 | 0 | |
| Cycling Road | MT | FIS | 0.1 | - 15.2 | - 13 | - 5.8 | |
| Halazouni | MT | FIS | 0 | 0 | - 10.1 | - 14.5 | |
| IT | MG | FIS | - 7.7 | - 17.4 | - 17.7 | - 20.2 | |
| Jahaad | MG | FIS | - 1 | - 6.8 | - 13.7 | - 8.8 | |
| Koodak | MG | FIS | - 8.7 | - 16.9 | - 21.4 | - 14.7 | |
| Mellat | MT | FIS | - 1.1 | - 2.1 | - 15.4 | - 10.6 | |
| Mohammadi | MG | FIS | - 1.5 | 0 | - 26.2 | - 13.4 | |
| Niro Entezami | MG | FIS | 3.7 | 6.5 | - 3.1 | - 5.3 | |
| Raoufi | MT | FIS | 3.1 | - 58.2 | - 64.5 | - 36.4 | |
| Shohada | MT | FIS | - 1.5 | - 10.1 | - 50.4 | - 18 | |
| Shohadaye 28 Dey | MG | FIS | 4.6 | - 33.7 | - 40.1 | - 23.5 | |
| 3 Khordad | MG | FIS | - 2.2 | - 3.4 | - 9.9 | - 8.4 | |
| 12 Farvardin | MG | FIS | 5.6 | - 10.1 | - 37 | - 14.9 |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| PUGS | Major species | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest parks | Keshavarz | Oriental plane | Ash | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | |||||||||||||||
| Neshteman | Ash | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Mondel pine | ||||||||||||||||
| Pir Gharib | Oriental plane | Ash | Judas | Mondel pine | ||||||||||||||||
| Rusi | Ash | Black locust | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Bitter Almond | |||||||||||||||
| Toos Nowzar | Oriental plane | Ash | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Bitter Almond | |||||||||||||||
| Amiriyeh | Ash | White Mulberry | Elm | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Bitter Almond | ||||||||||||||
| Cycling Road | Oriental plane | Elm | ||||||||||||||||||
| Raoufi | Oriental plane | Ash | Black locust | Mondel pine | ||||||||||||||||
| Halazouni | Oriental plane | Ash | Elm | Mondel pine | ||||||||||||||||
| Mellat | Oriental plane | Ash | Elm | Black locust | Mondel pine | |||||||||||||||
| Shohada | Ash | Black locust | Judas | Mondel pine | Arborvitae | |||||||||||||||
| Azadegan | Kentucky blue grass | Oriental plane | Ash | Black locust | Glossy privet | Japanese quince | ||||||||||||||
| IT | Kentucky blue grass | Oriental plane | Barberry | Privet | Ash | Rose | ||||||||||||||
| Jahaad | Kentucky blue grass | Privet | Rose | |||||||||||||||||
| Koodak | Kentucky blue grass | Privet | Barberry | Rose | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Wild Pear | |||||||||||||
| Mohammadi | Kentucky blue grass | Oriental plane | Ash | Black locust | Rose | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | |||||||||||||
| Niro Entezami | Kentucky blue grass | Oriental plane | Black poplar | Ash | Elm | Black locust | ||||||||||||||
| Shohadaye 28 Dey | Kentucky blue grass | Walnut trees | Paulownia | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Mondel pine | English Lavender | |||||||||||||
| 3 Khordad | Kentucky blue grass | Privet | Rose | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | Deodar Cedar | ||||||||||||||
| 12 Farvardin | Kentucky blue grass | Ash | Black locust | Arizona cypress | Arborvitae | |||||||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



