Submitted:
18 March 2025
Posted:
18 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Data and Methodology
4. Econometric Analysis
4.1. E-Environment Econometric Results
4.1.1. Clusterization model
4.1.2. ML Regressions
4.2. S-Social Econometric Results
4.2.1. Clusterization Models
4.2.2. ML Regressions
4.3. G-Governance
4.3.1. Clusterization Model
4.3.2. ML Regressions
5. Conclusions
References
- Abbruzzese, M.; Infante, D.; Smirnova, J. (2020). European Countries on a green path. Connections between environmental quality, renewable energy and economic growth.
- Adjuik, T.A.; Davis, S.C. Machine learning approach to simulate soil CO2 fluxes under cropping systems. Agronomy 2022, 12, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbo, E.; Uchenna, U.; Achema, F. Greenhouse gas emission and energy consumption disclosure on market competitiveness of listed non financial firms in Nigeria. IGWEBUIKE: African Journal of Arts and Humanities.
- Alataş; S; Akın, T. The impact of income inequality on environmental quality: a sectoral-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2022, 65, 1949–1974. [Google Scholar]
- Aleixandre-Tudó, J.L.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Aleixandre, J.L.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R. Trends in funding research and international collaboration on greenhouse gas emissions: a bibliometric approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021, 28, 32330–32346. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, M.I.; Islam, M.M.; Ceh, B. Assessing the impact of three emission (3E) parameters on environmental quality in Canada: A provincial data analysis using the quantiles via moments approach. International Journal of Green Energy 2025, 22, 551–569. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Sinan, M.A.; Bubshait, A.A.; Alamri, F. Saudi Arabia’s journey toward net-zero emissions: progress and challenges. Energies 2023, 16, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altunbas, Y.; Gambacorta, L.; Reghezza, A.; Velliscig, G. Does gender diversity in the workplace mitigate climate change? Journal of Corporate Finance 2022, 77, 102303. [Google Scholar]
- An, R.; Vo, K.; Ov, Z.; Pa, B. Carbon Footprint Comparative Analaysis for Existing and Promising Thermal Power Plants. Eurasian Physical Technical Journal 2022, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, F.C.; Clough, T.J.; Condron, L.M.; Richards, K.G.; Rousset, C. Nitrous oxide responses to long-term phosphorus application on pasture soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 2023, 66, 171–188. [Google Scholar]
- Anwar, S.; Yani, M.; Hendrizal, M. Nitrous oxide emission from conservation forest of Kampar Peninsula peatland ecosystem. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management) 2021, 11, 442–452. [Google Scholar]
- Baimukhamedova, A. The Role of Energy Intensity and Investment in Reducing Emissions in Türkiye. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies 2024, 68, 127–140. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, M.K.; Azad, A.K.; Datta, A.; Dutta, S.; Roy, S.; Chopra, S.S. Navigating sustainability through greenhouse gas emission inventory: ESG practices and energy shift in Bangladesh’s textile and readymade garment industries. Environmental Pollution 2024, 345, 123392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biswas, M.K.; Azad, A.K.; Datta, A.; Dutta, S.; Roy, S.; Chopra, S.S. Developing Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory for Bangladesh's Textile and Readymade Garment Industries and Discerning the Implications of the ESG Disclosure in the Emission Reduction. Available at SSRN 459 7624.
- Blair, M. (2021). Evolution Of ESG reporting within the Canadian energy industry.
- Bolton, P.; Halem, Z.; Kacperczyk, M. The financial cost of carbon. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2022, 34, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bombina, P.; Tally, D.; Abrams, Z.B.; Coombes, K.R. SillyPutty: Improved clustering by optimizing the silhouette width. PloS one 2024, 19, e0300358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boubaker, S.; Choudhury, T.; Hasan, F.; Nguyen, D.K. Firm carbon risk exposure, stock returns, and dividend payment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2024, 221, 248–276. [Google Scholar]
- Brühl, V. (2021). Green finance in Europe: Strategy, regulation and instruments (No. 657). CFS Working Paper Series.
- Bueno, E.; Mania, D.; Mesa, S.; Bedmar, E.J.; Frostegård, Å.; Bakken, L.R.; Delgado, M.J. Regulation of the emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide by the soybean endosymbiont Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calleja-Cervantes, M.E.; Huerfano, X.; Barrena, I.; Estavillo, J.M.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Gonzalez-Murua, C.; Menéndez, S. Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) Emissions from Forests, Grasslands and Agricultural Soils in Northern Spain. Just Enough Nitrogen: Perspectives on how to get there for regions with too much and too little nitrogen.
- Čapla, J. , Zajác, P., Čurlej, J., & Hanušovský, O. The current state of carbon footprint quantification and tracking in the agri-food industry. Scifood 2025, 19, 110–127. [Google Scholar]
- Chicco, D.; Warrens, M.J.; Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj computer science 2021, 7, e623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çıtak, F.; Meo, M.S. Quantifying Portfolio Environmental and Social Impact: Assessing Metrics and Tools with a Focus on Green Bonds. In Green Bonds and Sustainable Finance (pp. 69–87). Routledge.
- Costantiello 2024, A. , & Leogrande, A. The Impact of Research and Development Expenditures on ESG Model in the Global Economy.
- Cui, X. , Shang, Z., Xia, L., Xu, R., Adalibieke, W., Zhan, X.,... & Zhou 2023, F. Deceleration of cropland-N2O emissions in China and future mitigation potentials. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56, 4665–4675. [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva LE, B.; Melton, N.M.; Wunsch, D.C. Incremental cluster validity indices for online learning of hard partitions: Extensions and comparative study. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 22025–22047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, S.; Dai, Y.; Yu, H. The effect of gender gap in labor market participation on carbon emission efficiency: State-level empirical evidence from the US. Energy & Environment, 2412. [Google Scholar]
- Das, A.C.; Mozumder MS, A.; Hasan, M.A.; Bhuiyan, M.; Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.N.; Alam, M.I. Machine learning approaches for demand forecasting: the impact of customer satisfaction on prediction accuracy. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology 2024, 6, 42–53. [Google Scholar]
- Datta, S. K. , & De, T. (2021). Linkage between energy use, pollution, and economic growth—a cross-country analysis. In Environmental Sustainability and Economy (pp. 85–110). Elsevier.
- Dennis, B. , & Iscan, T. (2024). A New Measure of Climate Transition Risk Based on Distance to a Global Emission Factor Frontier.
- Ding, M. , & Chen, G. (2022, November). Assessment of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural systems in Thailand and low carbon measures. In International Conference on Sustainable Technology and Management (ICSTM 2022) (Vol. 12299, pp. 87–94). SPIE.
- Drago, C. , & Leogrande, A. (2024). Beyond Temperature: How the Heat Index 35 Shapes Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards.
- Dursun, M. , & Alkurt, R. (2024). Net zero performance evaluation of European Continent Countries considering Paris Agreement climate goals. Kybernetes.
- Fahrudin, T.; Asror, I.; Wibowo YF, A. Analyzing schools admission performance achievement using hierarchical clustering. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, S.; Yoh, M. Nitrous oxide emissions in proportion to nitrification in moist temperate forests. Biogeochemistry 2020, 148, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X. , Tao, C., & Zhao, J. (2024, November). Advanced stock price prediction with xlstm-based models: Improving long-term forecasting. In 2024 11th International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) (pp. 117–123). IEEE.
- Garcia-Ceja, E. , Hugo, Å., Morin, B., Hansen, P. O., Martinsen, E., Lam, A. N., & Haugen, Ø. (2020). A Feature Importance Analysis for Soft-Sensing-Based Predictions in a Chemical Sulphonation Process.
- Gruber, W. (2021). Long-term N2O emission monitoring in biological wastewater treatment: methods, applications and relevance (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich).
- Grundström, G. , & Miedel, I. (2021). Sustainable Investing: On the relation between sustainability rating and greenhouse gas emissions.
- Gu, Y.; Katz, S.; Wang, X.; Vasarhelyi, M.; Dai, J. Government ESG reporting in smart cities. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2024, 54, 100701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guermazi, I. , Smaoui, A., & Chabchoub, M. (2025). Analysis of factors mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in Saudi Arabia. Society and Business Review.
- Gulaliyev, M. , Hasanov, R., Sultanova, N., Ibrahimli, L., & Guliyeva, N. R&D Expenditure and its Macroeconomic effects: A comparative study of Israel and South Caucasus countries.
- Haider, A. , Bashir, A., & ul Husnain, M. I. (2020). Impact of agricultural land use and economic growth on nitrous oxide emissions: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Science of the Total Environment 2024, 741, 140421. [Google Scholar]
- Haider, A.; ul Husnain, M.I.; Rankaduwa, W.; Shaheen, F. Nexus between nitrous oxide emissions and agricultural land use in agrarian economy: An ardl bounds testing approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hailemariam, A.; Dzhumashev, R.; Shahbaz, M. Carbon emissions, income inequality and economic development. Empirical Economics 2020, 59, 1139–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamrani, A.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Madramootoo, C.A. Machine learning for predicting greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 741, 140338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, F. , Farooq, M. U., Nadeem, M., & Noor, M. (2023). Public spending, green finance, and zero carbon for sustainable development: a case of top 10 emitting countries (Retraction of Vol 10, 10.3389/FENVS. 2022.834195, 2022).
- Harasheh, M. , & Harasheh, M. (2021). Commodities and the Sustainability Transition. Global Commodities: Physical, Financial, and Sustainability Aspects, 129-154.
- Hossen, M.B.; Auwul, M.R. Comparative study of K-means, partitioning around medoids, agglomerative hierarchical, and DIANA clustering algorithms by using cancer datasets. Biomedical Statistics and Informatics 2020, 5, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jansson, V. I. (2023). GHG Emissions and Climate Change Mitigation. Master Thesis. Copenhagen Business School.
- Jiang, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Xia, X. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions decrease significantly under stronger light irradiance in riverine water columns with suspended particles. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57, 19749–19759. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, L. , Gu, Y. Available at SSRN 412 1907.
- Kang, H. Impacts of income inequality and economic growth on CO2 emissions: comparing the Gini coefficient and the top income share in OECD countries. Energies 2022, 15, 6954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannoa, M. Assessing the impact of carbon emissions on firm default risk: A global perspective.
- Kaplan, R. S. , & Ramanna, K. (2021). How to fix ESG reporting. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School.
- Kim, E. The effect of female personnel on the voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions information. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19, 13247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Koloszko-Chomentowska, Z.; Sieczko, L.; Trochimczuk, R. Production profile of farms and methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Energies 2021, 14, 4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambiasi, L.; Ddiba, D.; Andersson, K.; Parvage, M.; Dickin, S. Greenhouse gas emissions from sanitation and wastewater management systems: a review. Journal of Water and Climate Change 2024, 15, 1797–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurenso, J.; Jiustian, D.; Fernando, F.; Suhandi, V.; Rochadiani, T.H. Implementation of K-Means, Hierarchical, and BIRCH Clustering Algorithms to Determine Marketing Targets for Vape Sales in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing 2024, 8, 62–70. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Duan, H.; Liu, L.; Qiu, R.; van den Akker, B.; Ni, B.J.; Ye, L. An integrated first principal and deep learning approach for modeling nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment plants. Environmental science & technology 2022, 56, 2816–2826. [Google Scholar]
- Long, H.; Feng, G. Innovation and Green Development.
- Mamatzakis, E.C.; Tzouvanas, P. Greenhouse gas emissions and quality of financial reporting: evidence from the EU. Journal of Applied Accounting Research.
- Markus 2025, A. F. , Fridgeirsson, E. A., Kors, J. A., Verhamme, K., & Rijnbeek, P. R. (, 1057. [Google Scholar]
- Marzadri, A. , Amatulli, G., Tonina, D., Bellin, A., Shen, L. Q., Allen, G. H., & Raymond, P. A. (, 9220. [Google Scholar]
- Micol, L. , & Costa, C. (2023). Why and how to scale up low-emissions beef in Brazil, and the role of carbon markets: Insights for beef production in Latin America.
- Molden, N. Innovative Emissions Measurement and Perspective on Future Tailpipe Regulation: Real-world measurement and role of VOCs and N2O emissions. Johnson Matthey Technology Review 2023, 67, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
- Muller, N. Z. (2021). Measuring firm environmental performance to inform ESG investing (No. w29454). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Naser, H.; Alaali, F. Mitigation of nitrous oxide emission for green growth: An empirical approach using ARDL. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 2021, 6, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
- Ncir CE, B.; Hamza, A.; Bouaguel, W. Parallel and scalable Dunn Index for the validation of big data clusters. Parallel Computing 2021, 102, 102751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng CK, C.; Webber, D. Aligning corporate carbon accounting with natural climate solutions in Southeast Asia. Environmental Development 2023, 45, 100805. [Google Scholar]
- Nyasulu, C.; Diattara, A.; Traore, A.; Deme, A.; Ba, C. Towards resilient agriculture to hostile climate change in the Sahel region: A case study of machine learning-based weather prediction in Senegal. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orsini, A. (2022). To what extent the UK emissions disclosure mandate of 2013 impacted the subsequent emissions level and ESG ratings? (Master's thesis).
- Padhi, P. P. , Padhy, S. R., Swain, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2024). Greenhouse gas emission mitigation from rice through efficient use of industrial and value-added agricultural wastes: a review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-39.
- Park, D.G.; Jeong, H.C.; Jang, E.B.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, H.S.; Park, H.R.; Oh, T.K. Effect of rice hull biochar treatment on net ecosystem carbon budget and greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese cabbage cultivation on infertile soil. Applied Biological Chemistry 2024, 67, 44. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlopoulos, J. , Vardakas, G., & Likas, A. (2024, October). Revisiting Silhouette Aggregation. In International Conference on Discovery Science (pp. 354–368). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Pei, E. , & Fokoué, E. (2022). Improving the Predictive Performances of $ k $ Nearest Neighbors Learning by Efficient Variable Selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:, arXiv:2211.02600.
- Prieto, B. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Risks in the Engineering and Construction Sector1.
- Qamruzzaman, M. Nexus between energy intensity, human capital development, Trade and environmental quality in LIC, LMIC and UMIC: Evidence from GMM. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 2022, 13, 051–068. [Google Scholar]
- Rafiee, J. , Sarma, P., Gutierrez, F., Hilliard, R., Calad, C. M., Angulo, O., & Boyer, B. (2022, April). Energy transition meets digital transformation: design and implementation of a comprehensive carbon emissions estimation and forecasting platform. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D031S038R003). OTC.
- Rezazadeh, A. (2020). Environmental pollution prediction of nox by process analysis and predictive modelling in natural gas turbine power plants. arXiv preprint arXiv:, arXiv:2011.08978.
- Rothman, T. (2023). Climate Change Risk for Financial Institutions: Predicting Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
- Sacco, D. , EMEA, C. I. O., & Chowdhury, A. ESG investment: understanding system changes. rn 2023, 3, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, D.; Basso, B.; Robertson, G.P. Machine learning improves predictions of agricultural nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from intensively managed cropping systems. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16, 024004. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, D.; Kaye, J.P.; Bhowmik, A.; Bruns, M.A.; Wallace, J.M.; Kemanian, A.R. Organic fertility inputs synergistically increase denitrification-derived nitrous oxide emissions in agroecosystems. Ecological Applications 2021, 31, e02403. [Google Scholar]
- Saleem, S. N. , & Butt, W. H. (.
- Schuuring, R. J. (2024). The effect of national ESG score on greenhouse gas emissions, moderated by quality of government. Bachelor Thesis Economics & Business. ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM.
- Shahapure, K. R. , & Nicholas, C. (2020, October). Cluster quality analysis using silhouette score. In 2020 IEEE 7th international conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA) (pp. 747–748). IEEE.
- Sibarani MA, J.A.; Diyasa IG, S.M.; Sugiarto, S. Penggunaan K-Means Dan Hierarchical Clustering Single Linkage Dalam Pengelompokkan Stok Obat. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika 2024, 5, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar]
- Sidestam, A. , & Karam, S. (2024). Evaluation of Net Zero Alignment Models for Investments.
- Sieranen, M.; Hilander, H.; Haimi, H.; Larsson, T.; Kuokkanen, A.; Mikola, A. Seasonality of nitrous oxide emissions at six full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Water Science & Technology 2024, 89, 603–612. [Google Scholar]
- Squillace, M. Accounting for Climate Impacts in Decisionmaking. Environmental Law 2023, 53, 649–705. [Google Scholar]
- Stinchcombe, A.M. Assessing the state of Scope 3 Greenhouse gas emissions reporting in Norway (Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences).
- Syahputri, Z. , & Siregar, M. A. P. (2024). Determining the optimal number of k-means clusters using the calinski harabasz index and krzanowski and lai index methods for groupsing flood prone areas in north sumatra. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika 2023, 8, 571–580. [Google Scholar]
- Takeda, N.; Friedl, J.; Rowlings, D.; De Rosa, D.; Scheer, C.; Grace, P. Exponential response of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions to increasing nitrogen fertiliser rates in a tropical sugarcane cropping system. Agriculture, 1073. [Google Scholar]
- Telly, Y.; Liu, X.; Gbenou TR, S. Investigating the Growth effect of carbon-intensive economic activities on economic growth: evidence from Angola. Energies 2023, 16, 3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turjak, S. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and guidelines for changes in environmental governance of european union companies (Doctoral dissertation, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Faculty of Economics in Osijek).
- Uri-Carreño, N.; Nielsen, P.H.; Gernaey, K.V.; Domingo-Félez, C.; Flores-Alsina, X. Nitrous oxide emissions from two full-scale membrane-aerated biofilm reactors. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 908, 168030. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Usman, M.; Rahman, S.U.; Shafique, M.R.; Sadiq, A.; Idrees, S. Renewable energy, trade and economic growth on nitrous oxide emission in G-7 countries using panel ARDL approach. Journal of Social Sciences Review 2023, 3, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
- Vărzaru, A.A.; Bocean, C.G. An Empirical Analysis of Relationships between Forest Resources and Economic and Green Performances in the European Union. Forests 2023, 14, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vestin, P.; Mölder, M.; Kljun, N.; Cai, Z.; Hasan, A.; Holst, J.; Lindroth, A. Impacts of clear-cutting of a boreal forest on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide fluxes. Forests 2020, 11, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voicu Ș, M. Lowering greenhouse gases emissions from the energy and oil companies in the European union: An economic overview. Athens J. Sci 2023, 10, 131–152. [Google Scholar]
- Vysala, A. , & Gomes, J. (2020). Evaluating and validating cluster results. arXiv preprint arXiv:, arXiv:2007.08034.
- Wang, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, S.; Xin, Y.; Jiang, C.; Liu, S.; Xia, X. Indirect nitrous oxide emission factors of fluvial networks can be predicted by dissolved organic carbon and nitrate from local to global scales. Global Change Biology 2022, 28, 7270–7285. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Li, J.; Yuan, X.; Senadheera, S.S.; Chang, S.X.; Wang, X.; Ok, Y.S. Machine learning predicts biochar aging effects on nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 2024, 4, 888–898. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Wang, H. Global data distribution weighted synthetic oversampling technique for imbalanced learning. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 44770–44783. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, H.T.; Lu, J.H.; Jhang, D.S. Features importance analysis of diesel vehicles’ NOx and CO2 emission predictions in real road driving based on gradient boosting regression model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18, 13044. [Google Scholar]
- Yoshino, N. , & Yuyama, T. ESG/Green investment and allocation of portfolio assets. Studies of Applied Economics 2021, 39. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, Y.; Sun, W.; Scheer, C.; Li, T.; Zhang, W. Global variations and drivers of nitrous oxide emissions from forests and grasslands. Frontiers in Soil Science 2022, 2, 1094177. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Zhao, B.; Shurpali, N. Nitrous oxide emissions from pan-Arctic terrestrial ecosystems: A process-based biogeochemistry model analysis from 1969 to 2019. EGUsphere 2023, 2023, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Yulianti, R. , Irfan, A., Afrila, W., & Yuliasmi, I. (2023, December). The Unfolding of ESG investment as a realization of sustainable development goals. In Proceeding International Conference on Economic and Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 01–15).
- Zhang, K.; Wu, H.; Li, M.; Yan, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Kang, X. Magnitude and edaphic controls of nitrous oxide fluxes in natural forests at different scales. Forests 2020, 11, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Ghia, K.; Lindeman, A.J. From Micro to Macro: Estimating Commodity Emissions and Water Exposures from Corporate Data. Journal of Impact & ESG Investing.
- Zhang, Q.; Smith, K.; Zhao, X.; Jin, X.; Wang, S.; Shen, J.; Ren, Z.J. Greenhouse gas emissions associated with urban water infrastructure: what we have learnt from China's practice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 2021, 8, e1529. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T. (2024, July). Visual Analysis of Ecological Economic Data Based on Clustering Algorithm. In 2024 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Robot Systems (AIARS) (pp. 929–933). IEEE.







| Variable | Acronym | Description |
| Nitrous oxide emissions (metric tons of CO2 equivalent per capita) | NOE | This metric quantifies annual nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from agriculture, energy, waste, and industry, excluding LULUCF. Emissions are converted to carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e) using Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors from the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), ensuring consistency in climate impact assessments. |
| Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI) | ASNFD | Net forest depletion is determined by multiplying unit resource rents by the amount of roundwood harvested beyond natural forest growth. This metric reflects the economic cost of unsustainable logging, highlighting the depletion of forest resources beyond their regeneration capacity. By assessing the gap between harvest rates and natural growth, it provides insight into forest sustainability and the long-term environmental and economic impacts of excessive resource extraction. |
| Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2017 PPP GDP) | EIPE | The energy intensity level of primary energy measures the ratio of energy supply to GDP at purchasing power parity. It reflects the amount of energy required to produce one unit of economic output. A lower energy intensity indicates greater efficiency, meaning less energy is consumed per unit of output. This metric is crucial for assessing energy efficiency and sustainability in economic growth, guiding policies toward reduced energy consumption and improved resource management. |
| Forest area (% of land area) | FA | Forest area refers to land covered by natural or planted trees reaching at least 5 meters in height, regardless of productivity. It excludes tree stands within agricultural systems, such as fruit plantations and agroforestry, as well as trees in urban parks and gardens. This definition helps distinguish forest ecosystems from other tree-covered landscapes, ensuring accurate assessments of forest resources for environmental monitoring, conservation efforts, and sustainable land management. |
| Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%) | AGRI | The welfare aggregate growth rate measures the annualized average increase in per capita real consumption or income for the total population over approximately five years. Derived from household surveys, this metric reflects overall economic well-being and living standards. By tracking changes in consumption or income, it provides insights into economic growth, poverty reduction, and inequality, helping policymakers assess the effectiveness of development strategies and social programs. |
| Fertility rate, total (births per woman) | FRT | The total fertility rate estimates the number of children a woman would have if she lived through her reproductive years and experienced the age-specific fertility rates of a given year. This measure reflects reproductive behavior and population growth trends, serving as a key demographic indicator. It helps policymakers assess fertility patterns, plan for future population changes, and develop strategies for healthcare, education, and economic development based on projected birth rates. |
| Gini index | GI | The Gini index quantifies income or consumption inequality within an economy, indicating how far distribution deviates from perfect equality. A value of 0 signifies complete equality, where everyone has the same income, while a value of 100 represents total inequality, where one individual holds all the income. This metric is widely used to assess economic disparity, helping policymakers evaluate social equity, design welfare programs, and track progress in reducing income inequality over time. |
| Income share held by lowest 20% | ISL20 | The percentage share of income or consumption represents the portion received by specific population subgroups, categorized by deciles or quintiles. This measure helps analyze income distribution and economic inequality. Due to rounding, the total percentage across quintiles may not always sum to 100. By assessing these shares, policymakers and researchers can evaluate disparities, monitor economic trends, and design policies to promote fairer income distribution and social equity. |
| People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population) | WATER |
This metric measures the percentage of people using improved drinking water sources that are accessible on-site, available when needed, and free from fecal or harmful chemical contamination. Improved sources include piped water, boreholes, tubewells, protected wells and springs, as well as packaged or delivered water. Ensuring access to safe drinking water is crucial for public health, reducing waterborne diseases, and supporting sustainable development and well-being in communities worldwide. |
| GDP growth (annual %) | GDPG | The annual GDP growth rate measures the percentage increase in GDP at market prices, based on constant local currency. Aggregates use constant 2010 U.S. dollars. GDP represents the total gross value added by resident producers, including product taxes and excluding subsidies. It does not account for asset depreciation or natural resource depletion. This indicator helps assess economic performance, guiding policymakers in evaluating growth trends and formulating development strategies. |
| Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate) | FMLP | The labor force participation rate measures the percentage of people aged 15 and older who are economically active, contributing labor to goods and services production. The female-to-male participation ratio is calculated by dividing the female labor force participation rate by the male rate and multiplying by 100. This metric helps assess gender disparities in employment, informing policies on workforce inclusion and economic development. |
| Regulatory Quality: Estimate | RQE | Regulatory quality assesses a government's ability to develop and enforce effective policies that support private sector growth. It reflects the efficiency, fairness, and stability of regulations impacting businesses and economic activities. Strong regulatory frameworks encourage investment and economic development |
| Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) | RDE | Gross domestic R&D expenditures measure the percentage of GDP spent on research and development, including both capital and current costs. These expenditures span four key sectors: business enterprise, government, higher education, and private non-profit. R&D activities encompass basic research, applied research, and experimental development. This indicator reflects a country's commitment to innovation, technological progress, and economic growth, guiding policy decisions on science and technology investment. |
| Scientific and technical journal articles | STJA | Scientific and technical journal articles represent the number of published research papers in fields such as physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, clinical medicine, biomedical research, engineering, technology, and earth and space sciences. This metric reflects a country's research output, scientific progress, and contributions to global knowledge. Tracking publication trends helps assess innovation, academic productivity, and the impact of research investments on technological and scientific advancements. |
| Strength of legal rights index (0=weak to 12=strong) | SLRI | The Strength of Legal Rights Index assesses how well collateral and bankruptcy laws protect borrowers and lenders, promoting secure lending. It ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating stronger legal frameworks that enhance access to credit. A well-designed legal system fosters financial stability, encouraging investment and economic growth. This index helps policymakers and investors evaluate the effectiveness of credit laws in supporting a robust financial environment. |
| Fixed-effects, using 1930 observations | Random-effects (GLS), using 1930 observations | |||||
| Coefficient | Std. Error | t-ratio | Coefficient | Std. Error | z | |
| Constant | -1537.59* | 875.027 | -1.757 | -356.662 | 261.750 | -1.363 |
| ASFND | 388.620*** | 111.720 | 3.479 | 226.326 | 63.2516 | 3.578 |
| EIPE | -23.9106*** | 6.61187 | -3.616 | -16.2174 | 5.23974 | -3.095 |
| FA | 45.1940* | 26.8273 | 1.685 | 11.7874 | 6.23894 | 1.889 |
| Statistics | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | ||
| Sum squared resid | 4.20e+10 | Sum squared resid | 4.48e+10 | |||
| LSDV R-squared | 0.073296 | Log-likelihood | -19105.89 | |||
| LSDV F(195, 1734) | 0.703319 | Schwarz criterion | 38242.05 | |||
| Log-likelihood | -19041.77 | rho | -0.092917 | |||
| Schwarz criterion | 39566.33 | S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | |||
| rho | -0.092917 | S.E. of regression | 4823.555 | |||
| S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | Akaike criterion | 38219.79 | |||
| S.E. of regression | 4918.738 | Hannan-Quinn | 38227.98 | |||
| Within R-squared | 0.012731 | Durbin-Watson | 2.166681 | |||
| P-value(F) | 0.999081 | |||||
| Akaike criterion | 38475.54 | |||||
| Hannan-Quinn | 38876.78 | |||||
| Durbin-Watson | 2.166681 | |||||
| Tests | Joint test on named regressors - Test statistic: F(3, 1734) = 7.45344 with p-value = P(F(3, 1734) > 7.45344) = 5.85983e-05 Test for differing group intercepts - Null hypothesis: The groups have a common intercept Test statistic: F(192, 1734) = 0.615528 with p-value = P(F(192, 1734) > 0.615528) = 0.999987 |
'Between' variance = 2.39935e+006 'Within' variance = 2.1737e+007 theta used for quasi-demeaning = 0.31056 Joint test on named regressors - Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(3) = 19.4119 with p-value = 0.000224696 Breusch-Pagan test - Null hypothesis: Variance of the unit-specific error = 0 Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(1) = 16.8159 with p-value = 4.11866e-05 Hausman test - Null hypothesis: GLS estimates are consistent Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(3) = 7.93254 with p-value = 0.0474267 |
||||
| Density-Based | Fuzzy C-Means | Hierarchical | Neighborhood-Based | |
| Maximum diameter | 9.377 | 8.730 | 4.851 | 6.373 |
| Minimum separation | 0.626 | 0.003 | 0.233 | 0.008 |
| Pearson's γ | 0.495 | 0.312 | 0.646 | 0.415 |
| Dunn index | 0.067 | 3.104×10-4 | 0.048 | 0.001 |
| Entropy | 0.059 | 2.043 | 0.810 | 2.060 |
| Calinski-Harabasz index | 157.775 | 331.266 | 276.568 | 966.206 |
| Cluster | 2 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Maximum Diameter | Minimum Separation | Pearson's γ | Dunn Index | Entropy | Calinski-Harabasz | |
| Density-Based | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| Fuzzy C-Means | 0.182 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.212 |
| Hierarchical | 1.000 | 0.368 | 1.000 | 0.716 | 0.621 | 0.151 |
| Neighborhood-Based | 0.398 | 0.008 | 0.308 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Algorithms | MSE | MSE(scaled) | RMSE | MAE / MAD | R² |
| Boosting Regression | 3,19843E+40 | 1766 | 56554677919974.9 | 27495573662284.5 | 0.013 |
| Decision Tree | 4,67384E+41 | 1279 | 6,83655E+13 | 27884948108250.7 | 0.129 |
| K-Nearest Neighbors | 3,30741E+41 | 1143 | 57510088985819.6 | 20214183938440.9 | 0.182 |
| Linear Regression | 4,2826E+41 | 1832 | 65441594103392.5 | 30141169680947.5 | 0.007 |
| Ranfom Forest | 3,88921E+41 | 1235 | 62363539135740.7 | 25751902907169.1 | 0.145 |
| Regularized Linear | 3,06909E+40 | 1911 | 55399392260728.8 | 27330517747988.2 | 0.002 |
| Support Vector Machine | 2,73796E+41 | 1715 | 52325517606098.3 | 12483937823834.3 | 0.02 |
| Mean dropout loss | |||
| FA | 8.211×10+13 | ||
| EIPE | 7.093×10+13 | ||
| ASNFD | 5.537×10+13 | ||
| Note. Mean dropout loss (defined as root mean squared error (RMSE)) is based on 50 permutations. | |||
| Case | Predicted | Base | ASNFD | EIPE | FA | ||||||
| 1 | 0.190 | 1.618×10+13 | 91.144 | -8.977×10+12 | -7.204×10+12 | ||||||
| 2 | 9.718×10+13 | 1.618×10+13 | -5.657×10+11 | -3.297×10+12 | 8.486×10+13 | ||||||
| 3 | 9.718×10+13 | 1.618×10+13 | -2.667×10+11 | -3.176×10+12 | 8.444×10+13 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.251 | 1.618×10+13 | 9.154×10+11 | -5.505×10+12 | -1.159×10+13 | ||||||
| 5 | 0.251 | 1.618×10+13 | 9.154×10+11 | -5.505×10+12 | -1.159×10+13 | ||||||
| Note. Displayed values represent feature contributions to the predicted value without features (column 'Base') for the test set. | |||||||||||
| Fixed-effects, using 1930 observations | Random-effects (GLS), using 1930 observations | |||||
| Coefficient | Std. Error | t-ratio | Coefficient | Std. Error | z | |
| Constant | 1454.83*** | 170.230 | 8.546 | 899.333*** | 262.237 | 3.429 |
| AGRI | 472.423*** | 79.2103 | 5.964 | 586.143*** | 74.9708 | 7.818 |
| FRT | 6.80979*** | 0.409731 | 16.62 | 6.73673*** | 0.390629 | 17.25 |
| GI | -56.4683*** | 18.2848 | -3.088 | -48.0761*** | 15.3428 | -3.133 |
| ISL20 | 325.574*** | 101.327 | 3.213 | 285.434*** | 84.3385 | 3.384 |
| WATER | -31.6670*** | 1.93732 | -16.35 | -21.4558*** | 1.52574 | -14.06 |
| Statistics | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | ||
| Sum squared resid | 3.30e+10 | Sum squared resid | 3.95e+10 | |||
| LSDV R-squared | 0.270528 | Log-likelihood | -18984.86 | |||
| LSDV F(197, 1732) | 3.260515 | Schwarz criterion | 38015.10 | |||
| Log-likelihood | -18810.83 | rho | -0.053556 | |||
| Schwarz criterion | 39119.58 | S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | |||
| rho | -0.053556 | S.E. of regression | 4532.691 | |||
| S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | Akaike criterion | 37981.71 | |||
| S.E. of regression | 4532.691 | Hannan-Quinn | 37993.99 | |||
| Within R-squared | 37981.71 | Durbin-Watson | 2.027854 | |||
| P-value(F) | 37993.99 | |||||
| Akaike criterion | 2.027854 | |||||
| Hannan-Quinn | 4844.417 | |||||
| Durbin-Watson | 4532.691 | |||||
| Tests | Joint test on named regressors - Test statistic: F(5, 1732) = 99.3334 with p-value = P(F(5, 1732) > 99.3334) = 3.04478e-92 Test for differing group intercepts - Null hypothesis: The groups have a common intercept Test statistic: F(192, 1732) = 0.942888 with p-value = P(F(192, 1732) > 0.942888) = 0.696184 |
'Between' variance = 8.53727e+006 'Within' variance = 1.71106e+007 theta used for quasi-demeaning = 0.591392 Joint test on named regressors - Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(5) = 461.246 with p-value = 1.84191e-97 Breusch-Pagan test - Null hypothesis: Variance of the unit-specific error = 0 Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(1) = 58.3018 with p-value = 2.24841e-14 Hausman test - Null hypothesis: GLS estimates are consistent Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(5) = 94.715 with p-value = 6.85546e-19 |
||||
| Neighborhood-Based | Density-Based | Fuzzy C-Means | Hierarchical | Random Forest | |
| Maximum diameter | 20.291 | 35.700 | 35.700 | 7.167 | 35.700 |
| Minimum separation | 0.008 | 0.268 | 0.014 | 0.855 | 9.159×10-16 |
| Pearson's γ | 0.413 | 0.777 | 0.200 | 0.751 | 0.042 |
| Dunn index | 4.133×10-4 | 0.008 | 3.914×10-4 | 0.119 | 2.566×10-17 |
| Entropy | 1.679 | 0.067 | 1.138 | 0.143 | 2.054 |
| Calinski-Harabasz index | 1.943.052 | 351.756 | 200.783 | 395.441 | 67.591 |
| Cluster | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Size | 1884 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Explained proportion within-cluster heterogeneity | 0.951 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Within sum of squares | 4.509.331 | 152.614 | 31.928 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 49.157 |
| Silhouette score | 0.727 | 0.526 | 0.801 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.811 |
| Note. The Between Sum of Squares of the 8 cluster model is 6830.97 | ||||||||
| Note. The Total Sum of Squares of the 8 cluster model is 11574 | ||||||||
| Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%) | Fertility rate, total (births per woman) | Gini index | Income share held by lowest 20% | Nitrous oxide emissions (metric tons of CO2 equivalent per capita) | People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population) | |
| Cluster 1 | -0.046 | -0.068 | 0.068 | 9.487×10-4 | -0.087 | 0.003 |
| Cluster 2 | -0.048 | -0.068 | 0.069 | -0.200 | 6.491 | 0.428 |
| Cluster 3 | -0.048 | 14.549 | 0.069 | 1.035 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| Cluster 4 | 26.764 | 16.532 | 0.069 | 0.946 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| Cluster 5 | 26.764 | -0.068 | 0.069 | 0.335 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| Cluster 6 | 14.484 | 11.568 | 0.069 | 1.463 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| Cluster 7 | 15.204 | -0.068 | 0.069 | -0.656 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| Cluster 8 | 0.573 | -0.068 | -14.517 | -0.656 | -0.240 | -0.881 |
| MSE | MSE(scaled) | RMSE | MAE / MAD | R^2 | |
| Random Forest | 0.3600117698984846 | 0.4052044609665427 | 0.0 | 0.40304705986553213 | 1.0 |
| Boosting | 0.53508900985729 | 0.8131970260223048 | 0.32368112518096126 | 0.0 | 0.0473186119873817 |
| Decision Tree | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.054866835868048414 | 0.5070895929367109 | 0.01892744479495268 |
| K-Nearest Neighbors | 0.42180373694276885 | 0.8155204460966542 | 0.12098647345216462 | 0.38438382120220915 | 0.04416403785488959 |
| Linear Regression | 0.0382521700750331 | 0.9223977695167287 | 0.6911298418038796 | 0.8766936557107904 | 0.0 |
| Regularized Linear | 0.9999999999999999 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.9999999999999999 | 0.0 |
| Support Vector Machine | 0.902898337501839 | 0.9423791821561338 | 0.8729590916197361 | 0.19592520124232793 | 0.0 |
| Relative Importance | Mean dropout loss | ||||
| People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population) | 52.228 | 7.471×10+13 | |||
| Fertility rate, total (births per woman) | 36.154 | 7.710×10+13 | |||
| Income share held by lowest 20% | 7.708 | 6.167×10+13 | |||
| Gini index | 3.854 | 6.167×10+13 | |||
| Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%) | 0.057 | 6.167×10+13 | |||
| Note. Mean dropout loss (defined as root mean squared error (RMSE)) is based on 50 permutations. | |||||
| Case | Predicted | Base | Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%) | Fertility rate, total (births per woman) | Gini index | Income share held by lowest 20% | People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population) | ||||||||
| 1 | 1.501×10+13 | 1.682×10+13 | 0.000 | 5.112×10+11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -2.320×10+12 | ||||||||
| 2 | 1.501×10+13 | 1.682×10+13 | 0.000 | 5.112×10+11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -2.320×10+12 | ||||||||
| 3 | 1.501×10+13 | 1.682×10+13 | 0.000 | -3.717×10+13 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.536×10+13 | ||||||||
| 4 | 3.491×10+12 | 1.682×10+13 | 0.000 | -4.869×10+13 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.536×10+13 | ||||||||
| 5 | 1.501×10+13 | 1.682×10+13 | 0.000 | -3.717×10+13 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.536×10+13 | ||||||||
| Note. Displayed values represent feature contributions to the predicted value without features (column 'Base') for the test set. | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-effects, using 1930 observations | Random-effects (GLS), using 1930 observations | |||||
| Coefficient | Std. Error | t-ratio | Coefficient | Std. Error | z | |
| Constant | 556.472 | 320.867 | 1.734 | 103.524 | 216.422 | 0.4783 |
| GDPG | 164.956*** | 17.3297 | 9.519 | 145.221*** | 15.0543 | 9.647 |
| FMLP | -25.5933*** | 5.50773 | -4.647 | -11.6487*** | 3.43191 | -3.394 |
| RQE | 71.9341*** | 31.3453 | 2.295 | 51.2178*** | 16.4078 | 3.122 |
| RDE | 2127.27*** | 253.026 | 8.407 | 843.694*** | 143.536 | 5.878 |
| STJA | -0.018322** | 0.00601105 | -3.048 | -0.0070** | 0.00277893 | -2.553 |
| SLRI | -7.80164*** | 1.00910 | -7.731 | -2.39160*** | 0.594355 | -4.024 |
| Statistics | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | Mean dependent var | 123.4940 | ||
| Sum squared resid | 3.84e+10 | Sum squared resid | 3.98e+10 | |||
| LSDV R-squared | 0.150695 | Log-likelihood | -18990.93 | |||
| LSDV F(198, 1731) | 1.551193 | Schwarz criterion | 38034.82 | |||
| Log-likelihood | -18957.61 | rho | -0.228742 | |||
| Schwarz criterion | 39420.70 | S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | |||
| rho | -0.228742 | S.E. of regression | 4548.164 | |||
| S.D. dependent var | 4844.417 | Akaike criterion | 37995.86 | |||
| S.E. of regression | 4712.930 | Hannan-Quinn | 38010.19 | |||
| Within R-squared | 0.095188 | Durbin-Watson | 2.415716 | |||
| P-value(F) | 5.13e-06 | |||||
| Akaike criterion | 38313.21 | |||||
| Hannan-Quinn | 38720.59 | |||||
| Durbin-Watson | 2.415716 | |||||
| Tests | Joint test on named regressors - Test statistic: F(6, 1731) = 30.3509 with p-value = P(F(6, 1731) > 30.3509) = 8.76611e-35 Test for differing group intercepts - Null hypothesis: The groups have a common intercept Test statistic: F(192, 1731) = 0.316789 with p-value = P(F(192, 1731) > 0.316789) = 1 |
'Between' variance = 0 'Within' variance = 2.22117e+007 theta used for quasi-demeaning = 0 Joint test on named regressors - Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(6) = 264.345 with p-value = 3.51602e-54 Breusch-Pagan test - Null hypothesis: Variance of the unit-specific error = 0 Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(1) = 75.4695 with p-value = 3.71086e-18 Hausman test - Null hypothesis: GLS estimates are consistent Asymptotic test statistic: Chi-square(6) = 67.1804 with p-value = 1.54599e-12 |
||||
| Density Based | Fuzzy C-Means | Hierarchical Clustering | Model Based | Neighborhood Based | Random Forest | |
| Maximum diameter | 0.06745352911624239 | 0.22273019387353776 | 0.014490492399853205 | 0.04702319565817511 | 0.015907641995282558 | 0.8812466415905428 |
| Minimum separation | 0.0043137529226470964 | 5,16E+10 | 0.0008921959227085836 | 9,76E+09 | 1,47E+09 | 9,95E-02 |
| Pearson's γ | 0.0016216319340663532 | 0.0013952893047397283 | 0.001445972702320808 | 0.0004108959502102246 | 0.0002271315632102517 | 0.0009254283837841031 |
| Dunn index | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Entropy | 5,09E+10 | 0.012457710676359694 | 0.0002944686050318971 | 0.0031294973180489346 | 0.0015837832808435588 | 0.04218162278344975 |
| Calinski-Harabasz index | 1.0 | 0.9999999999999999 | 0.9999999999999999 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Cluster | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||||
| Size | 1864 | 32 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Explained proportion within-cluster heterogeneity | 0.977 | 0.010 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 6.879×10-4 | 2.534×10-4 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 9.414×10-5 | 9.886×10-22 | |||||||||||
| Within sum of squares | 4210.053 | 42.132 | 21.572 | 9.421 | 2.964 | 1.092 | 21.715 | 0.000 | 0.406 | 4.260×10-18 | |||||||||||
| Silhouette score | 0.611 | 0.653 | 0.559 | 0.795 | 0.745 | 0.830 | 0.572 | 0.000 | 0.921 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
| Note. The Between Sum of Squares of the 10 cluster model is 9193.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Note. The Total Sum of Squares of the 10 cluster model is 13503 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| GDP growth (annual %) | Nitrous oxide emissions (metric tons of CO2 equivalent per capita) | Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate) | Regulatory Quality: Estimate | Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) | Scientific and technical journal articles | Strength of legal rights index (0=weak to 12=strong) | |||||||||
| Cluster 1 | 0.003 | -0.008 | -0.118 | -0.081 | -0.103 | -0.039 | -0.095 | ||||||||
| Cluster 2 | 0.822 | 0.300 | 4.471 | -0.081 | -0.103 | -0.039 | -0.095 | ||||||||
| Cluster 3 | -0.165 | 0.318 | 9.127 | -0.081 | -0.103 | -0.039 | -0.095 | ||||||||
| Cluster 4 | -1.505 | 0.210 | -0.240 | 14.445 | 10.327 | -0.039 | 10.806 | ||||||||
| Cluster 5 | -1.505 | -0.004 | -0.240 | 14.747 | 0.936 | -0.039 | 10.685 | ||||||||
| Cluster 6 | -0.982 | -0.644 | -0.240 | 0.140 | 9.909 | -0.039 | 10.512 | ||||||||
| Cluster 7 | -0.797 | 0.830 | -0.240 | 5.621 | 9.926 | -0.039 | 10.409 | ||||||||
| Cluster 8 | -0.776 | 2.309 | -0.240 | 4.690 | 9.960 | -0.039 | 0.963 | ||||||||
| Cluster 9 | -1.505 | -0.644 | -0.240 | -0.081 | 8.376 | -0.039 | -0.095 | ||||||||
| Cluster 10 | -1.505 | -0.644 | -0.240 | -0.081 | -0.103 | 25.338 | -0.095 | ||||||||
| MSE | MSE(scaled) | RMSE | MAE / MAD | R² | |
| Boosting | 0.9728629579375847 | 0.7763313609467455 | 0.8359913803089771 | 0.7568395879174474 | 0.09583333333333335 |
| Decision Tree | 0.7053692576080636 | 0.6248520710059171 | 0.0 | 0.2360953723670376 | 0.2 |
| K-Nearest Neighbors | 0.8914518317503393 | 0.7136094674556213 | 0.5943462348840258 | 0.9127409854532011 | 0.13333333333333333 |
| Linear Regression | 0.9340957549912774 | 0.8520710059171599 | 0.719097048440756 | 0.8641982435387621 | 0.05416666666666666 |
| Random Forest | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.6100728056507307 | 10.000.000.000.000.000 |
| Regularized Linear | 0.9592944369063772 | 10.000.000.000.000.000 | 0.7917614846829375 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Support Vector Machine | 1.0 | 0.9810650887573964 | 0.913767544533286 | 0.0 | 0.004166666666666666 |
| Mean decrease in accuracy | Total increase in node purity | |
| Regulatory Quality: Estimate | 2.195×10+27 | 6.433×10+29 |
| Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate) | 2.076×10+27 | 5.768×10+29 |
| Scientific and technical journal articles | 2.171×10+27 | 4.340×10+29 |
| GDP growth (annual %) | 3.630×10+26 | 3.111×10+29 |
| Scientific and technical journal articles | 1.153×10+27 | 2.296×10+29 |
| Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) | 1.385×10+27 | 1.891×10+29 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).