Submitted:
10 March 2025
Posted:
11 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Ahmed, M.J. , Okoye, P.U., Hummadi, E.H., Hameed, B.H., 2019. High-performance porous biochar from the pyrolysis of natural and renewable seaweed (Gelidiella acerosa) and its application for the adsorption of methylene blue. Bioresour. Technol. 278, 159–164. [CrossRef]
- Ayiania, M. , Weiss-Hortala, E., Smith, M., McEwen, J.S., Garcia-Perez, M., 2020. Microstructural analysis of nitrogen-doped char by Raman spectroscopy: Raman shift analysis from first principles. Carbon N. Y. 167, 559–574. [CrossRef]
- Bakshi, S. , Banik, C., Laird, D.A., 2020. Estimating the organic oxygen content of biochar. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Barquilha, C.E.R. , Braga, M.C.B., 2021. Adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants onto biochars: Challenges, operating conditions, and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. Reports 15, 100728. [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.B. , McKeogh, B.J., Tompsett, G.A., Lewis, R., Deskins, N.A., Timko, M.T., 2017. Structural analysis of hydrothermal char and its models by density functional theory simulation of vibrational spectroscopy. Carbon N. Y. 125, 614–629. [CrossRef]
- Chung, B.Y.H. , Ang, J.C., Tang, J.Y., Chong, J.W., Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Chemmangattuvalappil, N.G., Thangalazhy-Gopakumar, S., 2023. Rough set approach to predict biochar stability and pH from pyrolysis conditions and feedstock characteristics. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 198, 221–233. [CrossRef]
- Crini, G. , 2006. Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 1061–1085. [CrossRef]
- Dang, B.T. , Ramaraj, R., Huynh, K.P.H., Le, M.V., Tomoaki, I., Pham, T.T., Hoang Luan, V., Thi Le Na, P., Tran, D.P.H., 2023. Current application of seaweed waste for composting and biochar: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 375, 128830. [CrossRef]
- Dutta, S. , Gupta, B., Srivastava, S.K., Gupta, A.K., 2021. Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: a critical review. Mater. Adv. 2, 4497–4531. [CrossRef]
- El Nemr, A. , Shoaib, A.G.M., El Sikaily, A., Mohamed, A.E.D.A., Hassan, A.F., 2021. Evaluation of Cationic Methylene Blue Dye Removal by High Surface Area Mesoporous Activated Carbon Derived from Ulva lactuca. Environ. Process. 8, 311–332. [CrossRef]
- Enaime, G. , Baçaoui, A., Yaacoubi, A., Lübken, M., 2020. Biochar for Wastewater Treatment—Conversion Technologies and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, Vol. 10, Page 3492 10, 3492. [CrossRef]
- Fernandez-Perez, A. , Marban, G., 2020. Visible light spectroscopic analysis of methylene blue in water; what comes after dimer? ACS Omega 5, 29801–29815. [CrossRef]
- Gayathri, K. , Palanisamy, N., 2020. Methylene blue adsorption onto an eco-friendly modified polyacrylamide/graphite composites: Investigation of kinetics, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies. Sep. Sci. Technol. 55, 266–277. [CrossRef]
- Global water & wastewater treatment market size 2021 | Statista [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.statista.com/statistics/1199744/market-size-water-and-wastewater-treatment-global/ (accessed 10.3.23).
- Güleç, F. , Williams, O., Kostas, E.T., Samson, A., Stevens, L.A., Lester, E., 2022. A comprehensive comparative study on methylene blue removal from aqueous solution using biochars produced from rapeseed, whitewood, and seaweed via different thermal conversion technologies. Fuel 330, 125428. [CrossRef]
- Ighalo, J.O. , Omoarukhe, F.O., Ojukwu, V.E., Iwuozor, K.O., Igwegbe, C.A., 2022. Cost of adsorbent preparation and usage in wastewater treatment: A review. Clean. Chem. Eng. 3, 100042. [CrossRef]
- Jeyasubramanian, K. , Thangagiri, B., Sakthivel, A., Dhaveethu Raja, J., Seenivasan, S., Vallinayagam, P., Madhavan, D., Malathi Devi, S., Rathika, B., 2021. A complete review on biochar: Production, property, multifaceted applications, interaction mechanism and computational approach. Fuel 292, 120243. [CrossRef]
- Jiang, D. , Li, H., Cheng, X., Ling, Q., Chen, H., Barati, B., Yao, Q., Abomohra, A., Hu, X., Bartocci, P., Wang, S., 2023. A mechanism study of methylene blue adsorption on seaweed biomass derived carbon: From macroscopic to microscopic scale. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 172, 1132–1143. [CrossRef]
- Li, Huaiyan, Kong, J., Zhang, H., Gao, J., Fang, Y., Shi, J., Ge, T., Fang, T., Shi, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, N., Dong, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Hui, 2023. Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of ball milled biomass fly ash/biochar composites for the adsorption of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution. J. Water Process Eng. 53, 103713. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.Y. , Han, D., Xie, J.F., Wang, Z.B., Gong, Z.Q., Li, B., 2018. Hierarchical porous activated biochar derived from marine macroalgae wastes (: Enteromorpha prolifera): Facile synthesis and its application on Methylene Blue removal. RSC Adv. 8, 29237–29247. [CrossRef]
- Liu, S. , Shen, C., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Hu, X., Li, B., Karnowo, Zhou, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., 2022. Development of CO2/H2O activated biochar derived from pine pyrolysis: application in methylene blue adsorption. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 97, 885–893. [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Tenllado, F.J. , Motta, I.L., Hill, J.M., 2021. Modification of biochar with high-energy ball milling: Development of porosity and surface acid functional groups. Bioresour. Technol. Reports 15, 100704. [CrossRef]
- Lyu, H. , Gao, B., He, F., Zimmerman, A.R., Ding, C., Tang, J., Crittenden, J.C., 2018. Experimental and modeling investigations of ball-milled biochar for the removal of aqueous methylene blue. Chem. Eng. J. 335, 110–119. [CrossRef]
- Mani, D. , Elango, D., Priyadharsan, A., Al-Humaid, L.A., Al-Dahmash, N.D., Ragupathy, S., Jayanthi, P., Ahn, Y.H., 2023. Groundnut shell chemically treated with KOH to prepare inexpensive activated carbon: Methylene blue adsorption and equilibrium isotherm studies. Environ. Res. 231, 116026. [CrossRef]
- Ovchinnikov, O. V. , Evtukhova, A. V., Kondratenko, T.S., Smirnov, M.S., Khokhlov, V.Y., Erina, O. V., 2016. Manifestation of intermolecular interactions in FTIR spectra of methylene blue molecules. Vib. Spectrosc. 86, 181–189. [CrossRef]
- Rijo, B. , Dias, A.P.S., Carvalho, J.P.S., 2023. Recovery of carbon fibers from aviation epoxy composites by acid solvolysis. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 35, 14–16. [CrossRef]
- Sangha, J.S. , Kelloway, S., Critchley, A.T., Prithiviraj, B., 2014. Seaweeds (Macroalgae) and Their Extracts as Contributors of Plant Productivity and Quality: The Current Status of Our Understanding. Adv. Bot. Res. 71, 189–219. [CrossRef]
- Singh, B. , Dolk, M.M., Shen, Q., Camps-Arbestain, M., 2017. Biochar pH, electrical conductivity and liming potential. Biochar A Guid. to Anal. Methods 23–38.
- Singh, M. , Vander Wal, R.L., 2022. Carbon Composites—Graphene-Oxide-Catalyzed Sugar Graphitization. C 2022, Vol. 8, Page 15 8, 15. [CrossRef]
- Singh, S. , Prajapati, A.K., Chakraborty, J.P., Mondal, M.K., 2023. Adsorption potential of biochar obtained from pyrolysis of raw and torrefied Acacia nilotica towards removal of methylene blue dye from synthetic wastewater. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 13, 6083–6104. [CrossRef]
- Sivaranjanee, R. , Kumar, P.S., Rangasamy, G., 2023. A critical review on biochar for environmental applications. Carbon Lett. 33, 1407–1432. [CrossRef]
- Soares Dias, A.P. , Rego, F., Fonseca, F., Casquilho, M., Rosa, F., Rodrigues, A., 2019. Catalyzed pyrolysis of SRC poplar biomass. Alkaline carbonates and zeolites catalysts. Energy 183, 1114–1122. [CrossRef]
- Soares Dias, A.P. , Rijo, B., Santos, F., Galhanos dos Santos, R., Frade, T., 2023. Overview on biofuels production in a seaweed biorefinery. Sci. Total Environ. 884, 163714. [CrossRef]
- Sun, J. , Norouzi, O., Mašek, O., 2022. A state-of-the-art review on algae pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar production. Bioresour. Technol. 346, 126258. [CrossRef]
- Timko, M.T. , Maag, A.R., Venegas, J.M., McKeogh, B., Yang, Z., Tompsett, G.A., Escapa, S., Toto, J., Heckley, E., Greenaway, F.T., 2016. Spectroscopic tracking of mechanochemical reactivity and modification of a hydrothermal char. RSC Adv. 6, 12021–12031. [CrossRef]
- Wang, K. , Peng, N., Zhang, D., Zhou, H., Gu, J., Huang, J., Liu, C., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, J., 2023. Efficient removal of methylene blue using Ca(OH)2 modified biochar derived from rice straw. Environ. Technol. Innov. 31, 103145. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. , Zhao, S., Uzoejinwa, B.B., Zheng, A., Wang, Q., Huang, J., Abomohra, A.E.F., 2020. A state-of-the-art review on dual purpose seaweeds utilization for wastewater treatment and crude bio-oil production. Energy Convers. Manag. 222, 113253. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. , Ma, C., Kong, D., Lian, L., Liu, Y., 2023. Review on application of algae-based biochars in environmental remediation: Progress, challenge and perspectives. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11, 111263. [CrossRef]
- Yaashikaa, P.R. , Kumar, P.S., Varjani, S., Saravanan, A., 2020. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol. Reports 28, e00570. [CrossRef]
- Yang, C. , Miao, S., Li, T., 2021. Influence of water washing treatment on Ulva prolifera-derived biochar properties and sorption characteristics of ofloxacin. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Yuan, R. , Dong, Y., Hou, R., Shang, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Chen, X., Song, H., 2023. Structural transformation of porous and disordered carbon during ball-milling. Chem. Eng. J. 454, 140418. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C. , Zhang, L., Gao, J., Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Duan, P., Hu, X., 2020. Evolution of the functional groups/structures of biochar and heteroatoms during the pyrolysis of seaweed. Algal Res. 48, 101900. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X. , Wang, Y., Cai, J., Wilson, K., Lee, A.F., 2020. Bio/hydrochar Sorbents for Environmental Remediation. Energy Environ. Mater. 3, 453–468. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y. , Yi, B., Yuan, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, M., Yan, S., 2018. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by cattle manure-derived low temperature biochar. RSC Adv. 8, 19917–19929. [CrossRef]


















| Technology | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Coagulation Flocculation Biodegradation |
Simple, economically feasible Economically attractive, publicly acceptable treatment |
High sludge production, handling and disposal problems Slow process, necessary to create an optimal favorable environment, maintenance and nutrition requirements |
| Adsorption on activated carbons | The most effective adsorbent, great, capacity, produces a high-quality treated effluent | Ineffective against disperse and vat dyes, the regeneration is expensive and results in loss of the adsorbent, non-destructive process | |
| Established | Membrane separations Ion-exchange Oxidation |
Removes all dye types, produces a high-quality treated effluent No loss of sorbent on regeneration, effective Rapid and efficient process |
High pressures, expensive, incapable of treating large volumes Economic constraints, not effective for disperse dyes High energy cost, chemicals required |
| Emerging | Advanced oxidation process Selective bio-adsorbents Biomass |
No sludge production, little or no consumption of chemicals, efficiency for recalcitrant dyes Economically attractive, regeneration is not necessary, high selectivity Low operating cost, good efficiency and selectivity, no toxic effect on microorganisms |
Economically unfeasible, formation of by-products, technical constraints Requires chemical modification, non-destructive process Slow process, performance depends on some external factors (pH, salts) |
| Biomass | Temperature (°C) | Activation | Washing | qmax (mg/g)* | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laminaria digitata | 400 | - | - | 117 | (Güleç et al., 2022) |
| Laminaria digitata | 250 | - | - | 175 | (Güleç et al., 2022) |
| Enteromorpha prolifera | 500 | NaOH, 800 °C | HCl, H2O | 244 | (Jiang et al., 2023) |
| Ulva lactuca | 700 | ZnCl2 | HCl, H2O | 345 | (El Nemr et al., 2021) |
| Gelidiella acerosa | 800 | - | HCl, H2O | 513 | (Ahmed et al., 2019) |
| Enteromorpha prolifera* Oily sludge | 700 | KOH | HCl, H2O | 910 | (Li et al., 2018) |
| Phylum | Species | Species (wt. %; dried) |
|---|---|---|
| Phaeophyceae | Ascophyllum nodosum | 5.0 |
| Fucus vesiculosus | 15.0 | |
| Gongolaria baccata | 10.1 | |
| Saccorhiza polyschides | 39.9 | |
| Chlorophyta | Ulva lactuca | 7.5 |
| Ulva rigida | 7.5 | |
| Rhodophyta | Gelidium corneum | 7.0 |
| Gracilaria gracilis | 4.0 | |
| Plocamium cartilagineum | 4.0 |
| Biochar ID | Yield (%) | pH |
|---|---|---|
| NW-S300 | 57.4 | 8.5 |
| W-S300 | - | 7.1 |
| NW-S400 | 46.0 | 10.3 |
| W-S400 | - | 9.3 |
| NW-BM-S400 | - | 10 |
| W-BM-S400 | - | 9.1 |
| MB solid (cm-1) | Char (cm-1) | Shift (cm-1) | Band assignment in MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3041 | 3058 | +17 | vhet(C-H) | |
| 2921 | 2921 | 0 | νas(CH3) | |
| 2850 | 2850 | 0 | νs(CH3) | |
| 1585 | 1596 | +11 | vhet(C=C), vhet(C=N) | |
| 1484 | 1489 | +5 | vhet(C=S+) | |
| 1437 | 1437 | 0 | δas(CH3) | |
| 1382 | 1387 | +4 | δ(C-H), γ(C-H) | |
| 1349 | 1349 | 0 | v(C=S+) | |
| 1313 | 1327 | +14 | v(C-N), in N-CH3 | |
| 1244 | 1244 | 0 | δ(C-H), γ(C-H) | |
| 1215 | 1223 | +8 | νhet(C-C) | |
| 1162 | 1172 | +10 | δhet(C-H) | |
| 1132 | 1134 | +2 | δhet(C-N) | |
| 1036 | 1036 | 0 | γhet(C-H) | |
| 947 | 952 | +5 | Nhet···HO | |
| 876 | 884 | +8 | Nhet···HO | |
| 821 | 827 | +6 | δhet(C-C) | |
| 666 | 668 | +2 | νs(C-S-C) in heterocycle | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).