Submitted:
01 March 2025
Posted:
03 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Dalbergia latifolia (Indian Rosewood) is a high-value timber species often limited by nutrient deficiencies. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, beneficial microorganisms, enhance plant growth by improving nutrient uptake and physiological processes. This study examined the effects of AM fungal inoculation on D. latifolia growth over 12 months, focusing on morphological, physiological, and symbiotic responses. The results demonstrated significant growth enhancement with AM fungi. Glomus mosseae achieved the tallest plant height (112 cm) at 12 months, followed by G. fasciculatum and G. leptotichum. Leaf length and width were also improved, with G. leptotichum (6.733 cm) and G. fasciculatum (6.433 cm) showing the longest leaves, and G. fasciculatum producing the widest leaves (5.1 mm). Shoot elongation was highest at 3 months in G. fasciculatum (16.33 cm) and at 12 months in G. mosseae (76 cm). Root growth was superior in G. fasciculatum and G. leptotichum, enhancing nutrient and water absorption. Chlorophyll content peaked at 9 months in G. mosseae (60.33) and remained high at 12 months (57). AM fungal colonization reached 35%, with G. fasciculatum showing the highest rate. These findings highlight the potential of AM fungi to enhance D. latifolia growth and support sustainable forestry.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site and Experimental Conditions
2.2. Planting Material Collection and Seed Treatment
2.3. Nursery Experiment and Experimental Design
- T1 (Control): D. latifolia without AM fungal inoculation.
- T2: D. latifolia inoculated with Glomus mosseae.
- T3: D. latifolia inoculated with Glomus fasciculatum.
- T4: D. latifolia inoculated with Glomus leptotichum.
2.4. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) Fungal Inoculum
2.5. Estimation of AM Fungal Root Colonization
2.6. Enumeration of AM Fungal Spores
2.7. Morphological and Physiological Evaluations
2.8. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. AM Fungal Colonization
3.2. Growth Parameters
3.3. Leaf Parameters
3.4. Shoot Growth
3.5. Root Growth
3.6. Root Nodulation
3.7. Chlorophyll Content
4. Discussion
Conclusions


Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arunkumar, A. N.; Warrier, R. R.; Kher, M. M.; Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Indian rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia Roxb.): biology, utilisation, and conservation practices. Trees - Structure and Function, 36(3), 883–898. [CrossRef]
- Kirtikar, K. R.; Basu, B. D. Indian medicinal plants; International Book Distributor: Dehradun, India, 2005.
- Sasidharan, K. R.; Prakash, S.; Muraleekrishnan, K.; Kunhikannan, C. Population structure and regeneration of Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. and D. sissoides Wight & Arn. in Kerala and Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review 2020, 5(9), 51–66.
- Sujatha, M. P.; Thomas, P.; Thomas, M. F. E. J. Growth enhancement of Dalbergia latifolia through soil management techniques. KFRI Research Report No. 303; Kerala Forest Research Institute: Kerala, India, 2008; pp. 1–110.
- Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Khizar, C.; Reddy, S. P. P. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in regulating growth, enhancing productivity, and potentially influencing ecosystems under abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants 2023, 12(17), 3102. [CrossRef]
- Martin, F.; Heijden, M. G. A. v. d. The mycorrhizal symbiosis: Research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application. New Phytologist 2024, 242(4), 1486–1506. [CrossRef]
- Brundrett, M. C. (2009). Mycorrhizal fungi: Diversity and functional significance. Plant and Soil, 321(1–2), 417–431.
- Kapoor, R.; Sharma, D.; Bhatnagar, A. K. Arbuscular mycorrhizae in micropropagation systems and their potential applications. Scientia Horticulturae 2008, 116, 227–239. [CrossRef]
- Karthikeyan, B.; Joe, M. M.; Jaleel, C. A. Response of some medicinal plants to vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculations. Journal of Scientific Research 2009, 1, 381–386. [CrossRef]
- Mridha, M. A. U.; Dhar, P. P. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and spore population in different agroforestry trees and crop species growing in Dinajpur, Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research 2007, 18, 91–96. [CrossRef]
- Orwa, C.; Mutua, A.; Kindt, R.; Jamnadass, R.; Simons, A. Agroforest tree database: A tree reference and selection guide (Version 4.0). 2009.
- International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). (1996). International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology, 24(1), 1-335.
- Phillips, J. M.; Hayman, D. S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 1970, 55, 158–161.
- Gerdemann, J. W.; Nicolson, T. H. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 1963, 46, 235–244.
- Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Little, T. M.; Hills, F. J. Agricultural experimentation; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1978.
- Arpana, J.; Bagyaraj, D. J. Response of Kalmegh to an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a plant growth-promoting rhizo microorganism at two levels of phosphorus fertilizer. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 2007, 2, 33–38.
- Zuccarini, P. Mycorrhizal infection ameliorates chlorophyll content and nutrient uptake of lettuce exposed to saline irrigation. Plant Soil and Environment 2007, 53, 283–289. [CrossRef]
- Chiramel, T.; Bagyaraj, D. J.; Patil, C. S. P. Response of Andrographis paniculata to different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Agricultural Technology 2006, 2, 221–228.
- Rajeshkannan, V.; Dhanapal, V.; Thangavelu, M. Influence of bioinoculants on growth and nutrient uptake in Dalbergia latifolia under tropical nursery conditions. In Microbiological research in agrosystem management; Rajesh Kannan, V., Ed.; Springer India Private Limited: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 207–234.
- Syam Prasad, S.; Ashok Kumar, K.; Sushma, P. R.; Ramadevi, B. Role of the AM fungi in physio-chemical properties of soil, study in Sathupally forest area, Khammam (District) Telangana State with reference to Anogeissus latifolia and Bambusa arundinacea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020, 9(09), 2754–2769.
- Smith, S. E., & Read, D. J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
- Janos, D. P. (2007). Mycorrhizas and tropical soils. In Ecology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Forests (pp. 173-185). Springer, Dordrecht.
| Parameter | T1 (Control) | T2 (Glomus mosseae) | T3 (Glomus fasciculatum) | T4 (Glomus leptotichum) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | ||||
| Plant Height (cm) | 21.66 ± 0.577b | 29.66 ± 2.082a | 32.66 ± 5.508a | 27.66 ± 0.577a |
| Average Leaf Length (cm) | 2.83 ± 0.289b | 3.53 ± 0.058a | 3.63 ± 0.231a | 3.53 ± 0.115a |
| Average Leaf Width (mm) | 1.93 ± 0.115b | 3.07 ± 0.379a | 3.00 ± 0.000a | 3.00 ± 0.000a |
| Shoot Length (cm) | 11.9 ± 0.1b | 16.00 ± 1.00a | 16.33 ± 0.577a | 16.00 ± 0.577a |
| Shoot Width (mm) | 0.25 ± 0.006c | 0.40 ± 0.10ab | 0.43 ± 0.058a | 0.30 ± 0.00bc |
| Root Length (cm) | 9.83 ± 0.29c | 11.67 ± 0.58b | 13.33 ± 0.58a | 10.33 ± 0.58c |
| Root Width (cm) | 0.243 ± 0.012b | 0.433 ± 0.058a | 0.50 ± 0.10a | 0.433 ± 0.058a |
| Number of Nodules | 30.33 ± 0.577b | 64.00 ± 1.00a | 63.33 ± 0.577a | 62.67 ± 0.577a |
| Total Chlorophyll Content (SPAD) | 29.00 ± 1.00d | 37.33 ± 0.577b | 33.33 ± 0.577c | 45.00 ± 1.00a |
| 6 months | ||||
| Plant Height (cm) | 28.86 ± 0.321b | 42.00 ± 1.00a | 40.67 ± 1.155a | 40.33 ± 0.577a |
| Average Leaf Length (cm) | 3.90 ± 0.10b | 5.03 ± 0.208a | 4.10 ± 0.173b | 4.10 ± 0.173b |
| Average Leaf Width (mm) | 3.70 ± 0.265b | 4.47 ± 0.153a | 3.47 ± 0.473b | 3.47 ± 0.473b |
| Shoot Length (cm) | 15.90 ± 0.10b | 16.33 ± 0.577b | 20.67 ± 2.082a | 16.00 ± 1.732b |
| Shoot Width (mm) | 0.32 ± 0.023b | 0.40 ± 0.00a | 0.43 ± 0.058a | 0.30 ± 0.00b |
| Root Length (cm) | 13.07 ± 0.208c | 25.67 ± 0.58b | 29.67 ± 1.16a | 25.67 ± 0.577b |
| Root Width (cm) | 0.33 ± 0.017b | 0.367 ± 0.058b | 0.53 ± 0.153a | 0.433 ± 0.058ab |
| Number of Nodules | 79.67 ± 5.508c | 135.67 ± 6.028a | 101.67 ± 7.37b | 86.67 ± 6.807c |
| Total Chlorophyll Content (SPAD) | 39.67 ± 1.528c | 46.33 ± 0.577b | 45.67 ± 0.577b | 51.33 ± 0.577a |
| 9 months | ||||
| Plant Height (cm) | 41.67 ± 0.577c | 70.33 ± 1.528b | 73.67 ± 2.082a | 73.00 ± 1.00ab |
| Average Leaf Length (cm) | 4.86 ± 0.078b | 5.03 ± 0.058a | 5.00 ± 0.00a | 4.97 ± 0.058a |
| Average Leaf Width (mm) | 4.02 ± 0.012b | 4.13 ± 0.153b | 4.27 ± 0.153b | 4.63 ± 0.231a |
| Shoot Length (cm) | 25.73 ± 0.058c | 45.33 ± 4.041a | 43.33 ± 1.53b | 37.67 ± 3.215b |
| Shoot Width (mm) | 0.53 ± 0.058b | 0.73 ± 0.058a | 0.60 ± 0.00b | 0.57 ± 0.058b |
| Root Length (cm) | 16.20 ± 0.10c | 26.33 ± 0.58b | 29.67 ± 1.55a | 26.00 ± 1.732b |
| Root Width (cm) | 0.48 ± 0.029b | 0.50 ± 0.00b | 0.60 ± 0.00a | 0.67 ± 0.058a |
| Number of Nodules | 81.67 ± 4.72b | 103.33 ± 2.082a | 96.67 ± 6.028a | 101.67 ± 4.359a |
| Total Chlorophyll Content (SPAD) | 32.00 ± 2.64d | 60.33 ± 0.577a | 51.00 ± 1.00b | 45.33 ± 0.577c |
| 12 months | ||||
| Plant Height (cm) | 60.50 ± 0.10b | 112.00 ± 4.00a | 109.00 ± 4.36a | 108.00 ± 2.65a |
| Average Leaf Length (cm) | 4.05 ± 0.006c | 4.90 ± 0.656b | 6.43 ± 0.404a | 6.73 ± 0.153a |
| Average Leaf Width (mm) | 3.55 ± 0.017d | 3.97 ± 0.153c | 5.10 ± 0.10a | 4.30 ± 0.20b |
| Shoot Length (cm) | 37.47 ± 0.379c | 76.00 ± 3.00a | 67.00 ± 1.732b | 69.00 ± 3.00b |
| Shoot Width (mm) | 0.48 ± 0.008b | 0.77 ± 0.153a | 0.87 ± 0.058a | 0.87 ± 0.058a |
| Root Length (cm) | 24.37 ± 0.321d | 35.33 ± 2.082c | 45.67 ± 0.577a | 42.33 ± 0.577b |
| Root Width (cm) | 0.43 ± 0.058b | 0.73 ± 0.058a | 0.80 ± 0.00a | 0.77 ± 0.058a |
| Number of Nodules | 85.00 ± 5.00c | 136.00 ± 4.58a | 128.00 ± 2.65b | 129.33 ± 5.69ab |
| Total Chlorophyll Content (SPAD) | 38.00 ± 3.00c | 57.00 ± 1.00a | 45.33 ± 0.577b | 43.00 ± 1.00c |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).