Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

On Quaternionic Analysis and a Certain Generalized Fractal-Fractional ψ-Fueter Operator

Submitted:

25 February 2025

Posted:

25 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

This paper introduce a fractional-fractal ψ-Fueter operator in the quaternionic context inspired in the concepts of proportional fractional derivative and Hausdorff derivative of a function with respect to a fractal measure. Moreover, we establish the corresponding Stokes and Borel-Pompeiu formulas associated to this generalized fractional-fractal ψ-Fueter operator.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

Introduction

The fractal derivative or Hausdorff derivative, is a relatively new concept of differentiation that extends Leibniz’s derivative for discontinuous fractal media. In the literature, there are various definitions of this new concept. For instance, in 2006 Chen introduced the concept of the Hausdorff derivative of a function with respect to a fractal measure t η , where η is the order of the fractal derivative. A treatment of a more general case goes back to the work of Jeffery in 1958.
Fractal calculus is extremely effective in branches such as fluid mechanics where hierarchical or porous media, turbulence or aquifers present fractal properties, which do not necessarily follow a Euclidean geometry.
Fractional calculus deals with the generalization of the concepts of differentiation and integration of non-integer orders. This generalization is not merely a purely mathematical curiosity, but it has demonstrated its application in various disciplines such as physics, biology, engineering, and economics.
Unlike fractional calculus, fractal calculus maintains the chain rule in a very direct way, which relates the fractal derivative to the classical derivative.
The fractal-fractional derivative (a new class of fractional derivative, which has many applications in real world problems) is a mathematical concept that combines two different ideas: fractals and fractional derivatives. Fractals are complex geometric patterns that repeat at different scales, while fractional derivatives are a generalization of ordinary derivatives that allow for non-integer orders. The combination of fractal theory and fractional calculus gave rise to new concepts of differentiation and integration.
A considerable literature has grown up around new fractal, fractional and fractal-fractional derivatives. For references connected with the subject being considered in this work we refer the reader to [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
Quaternionic analysis (the most natural and close generalization of complex analysis) concerns the connection between analysis (even topology / geometry) in R 4 and the algebraic structure of quaternions H . At the heart of this function theory lies the notion of ψ hyperholomorphic functions defined on domains in R 4 with values in H , i.e., null solutions of the so-called ψ Fueter operator (to be defined later) in which the standard basis of R 4 is replaced by a structural set ψ = { 1 , ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 } H 4 .
In the last years, there is an increasing interest in finding a framework for a fractal or fractional counterpart of quaternionic analysis, see [13,14,15,16,17,18,19] and the references given there.
This paper introduce a fractional-fractal ψ -Fueter operator in the quaternionic context inspired in the concepts of proportional fractional derivative and Hausdorff derivative of a function with respect to a fractal measure. Moreover, we establish the corresponding Stokes and Borel-Pompeiu formulas associated to this generalized fractional-fractal ψ -Fueter operator.
The outline of this paper is summarized as follows. In Section 2 we give a brief exposition of the generalized fractal-fractional derivative considered. Section 3 presents some preliminaries on quaternionic analysis. In Section 4 we develop the rudiments of a function theory induced by a quaternionic β -proportional fractal Fueter operator and finally in Section 5 we will be concerned with a quaternionic β -proportional fractal Fueter operator with truncated exponential functions as fractals measure.

1. Generalized Fractal-Fractional Derivative

Definition 1.
The fractal derivative of a function f, defined on an interval I, with respect to a fractal measure ν ( η , t ) is given by
d ν f ( t ) d t η : = lim τ t f ( t ) f ( τ ) ν ( η , t ) ν ( η , τ ) , η > 0 .
If d ν f ( t ) d t η exists for all t I then f is real fractal differentiable on I with order η.
Some well-known cases. If ν ( h , t ) = t for all t I then d ν d t η = d d t is the derivative operator. In addition, if ν ( h , t ) = h ( t ) for all t I where h ( t ) > 0 for all t I then d ν f ( t ) d t η = f ( t ) h ( t ) for all f C 1 ( I )
On the other hand, if ν ( η , t ) = t η for all t I then d ν f ( t ) d t η reduces to the Hausdorff derivative. Another useful fractal measure is ν ( η , t ) = e t α for all t I and α ( 0 , 1 ] .
We consider an well-known extension of the previous fractal derivative.
Definition 2.
Given β [ 0 , 1 ] we present the β-fractal derivative of a function f, defined on an interval I, with respect to a fractal measure ν ( η , t ) :
d ν β f ( t ) d t η : = lim τ t ( f ( t ) ) β ( f ( τ ) ) β ν ( η , t ) ν ( η , τ ) , η > 0 .
In order to make our description of the concept of fractal-fractional derivatives to be used precise, we introduce the notion of fractional proportional derivative, following [20].
Definition 3.
Let χ 0 , χ 1 : [ 0 , 1 ] × I be continuous functions such that
lim σ 0 + χ 1 ( σ , t ) = 1 , lim σ 0 + χ 0 ( σ , t ) = 0 , lim σ 1 χ 1 ( σ , t ) = 0 , lim σ 1 χ 0 ( σ , t ) = 1 .
The proportional derivative of f C 1 ( I ) of order σ [ 0 , 1 ] is given by
D σ f ( t ) = χ 1 ( σ , t ) f ( t ) + χ 0 ( σ , t ) f ( t ) , t I .
A combination of Definitions 2 and 3 yields.
Definition 4.
Let β [ 0 , 1 ] , the proportional β-fractal derivative of f : I R with respect to ν ( η , t ) and σ is defined to be
d ν σ , β f ( t ) d t η ( t ) : = χ 1 ( σ , t ) f ( t ) + χ 0 ( σ , t ) d ν β f ( t ) d t η ,
if it exists for all t I .
Remark 1.
Given α ( 0 , 1 ] and k N we will consider the k-truncated exponential function defined as follows
e ( t α ) k : = i = 0 k ( t α ) i i !
for all t R . For k = 1 we have e ( t α ) 1 = 1 + t α and for k = we have e ( t α ) = e t α .
Remark 2.
Important particular case, when the proportional and fractal measure in Definition 4 are given by
χ 1 ( σ , t ) = 1 σ , χ 0 ( σ , t ) = σ , ν ( k , t ) = e ( t α ) k
for all σ [ 0 , 1 ] and t I allows to introduce some cases of generalized fractal-fractional derivative to consider. For f C 1 ( I ) we have
d σ , β d t α , k f ( t ) : = ( 1 σ ) f ( t ) + σ ( f β ) ( t ) e ( t α ) k ,
for all t I . The particular cases k = 1 , reduces to
d σ , β d t α , 1 f ( t ) = ( 1 σ ) f ( t ) + σ ( f β ) ( t ) α t α 1 , d σ , β d t α , f ( t ) = ( 1 σ ) f ( t ) + σ ( f β ) ( t ) α t α 1 e t α ,
where clearly the conditions α ( 0 , 1 ] and t > 0 are necessary.
Addressing the issue σ = α requires that the case α = 0 should be omitted.
d α , β d t α , 1 f ( t ) = ( 1 α ) f ( t ) + ( f β ) ( t ) t α 1 , d α , β d t α , f ( t ) = ( 1 α ) f ( t ) + ( f β ) ( t ) t α 1 e t α .
The k-truncated exponential function as fractal measure provides the generalized fractal-fractional drivative in much generality
d α , β d t α , k f ( t ) : = ( 1 α ) f ( t ) + ( f β ) ( t ) t α 1 e ( t α ) k 1 .

2. Preliminaries on Quaternionic Analysis

We begin by recalling some background and fixing notation that will be used throughout the entire document. For more details, we refer the interested reader to [21,22,23].
A real quaternion is an element of the form x = x 0 + x 1 e 1 + x 2 e 2 + x 3 e 3 , where x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 R and the imaginary units e 1 , e 2 , e 3 satisfy:
e 1 2 = e 2 2 = e 3 2 = 1 , e 1 e 2 = e 2 e 1 = e 3 , e 2 e 3 = e 3 e 2 = e 1 , e 3 e 1 = e 1 e 3 = e 2 .
Quaternions form a skew-field denoted by H . The set { 1 , e 1 , e 2 , e 3 } is the standard basis of H .
The vector part of x H is by definition, x : = x 1 e 1 + x 2 e 2 + x 3 e 3 while its real part is x 0 : = x 0 . The quaternionic conjugation of x, denoted by x ¯ is defined by x ¯ = : x 0 x and norm the x H is given by
x : = x 0 2 + x 1 2 + x 2 3 + x 3 2 = x x ¯ = x ¯ x .
The quaternionic scalar product of x , y H is given by
x , y : = 1 2 ( x ¯ y + y ¯ x ) = 1 2 ( x y ¯ + y x ¯ ) .
A set of quaternions ψ = { ψ 0 , ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 2 } is called structural set if ψ k , ψ s = δ k , s , for k , s = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 and any quaternion x can be rewritten as x ψ : = k = 0 3 x k ψ k , where x k R for all k. Notion of structural sets is due to N o ^ no [24,25].
Given q , x H we follow the notation used in [21] to write
q , x ψ = k = 0 3 q k x k ,
where q k , x k R for all k.
Let ψ an structural set. From now on, we will use the mapping
k = 0 3 x k ψ k ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) .
in essential way.
Given a domain Ω H R 4 and a function f : Ω H . Then f is written as: f = k = 0 3 f k ψ k , where f k , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , are R -valued functions. Properties of f are due to properties of all components f k such as continuity, differentiability, integrability and so on. For example, C 1 ( Ω , H ) denotes the set of continuously differentiable H -valued functions defined in Ω .
The left- and the right- ψ -Fueter operators are given by ψ D [ f ] : = k = 0 3 ψ k k f and ψ D r [ f ] : = k = 0 3 k f ψ k , for all f C 1 ( Ω , H ) , respectively, where k f = f x k for all k.
Let Ω be a 3 dimensional smooth surface. Then recall the Borel-Pompieu and differential and integral versions of Stokes’ formulas
Ω ( K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ f ( τ ) + g ( τ ) σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) ) Ω ( K ψ ( y x ) ψ D [ f ] ( y ) + ψ D r [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) ) d y = f ( x ) + g ( x ) , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯ ,
for all f , g C 1 ( Ω , H ) .
d ( g σ x ψ f ) = g ψ D [ f ] + ψ D r [ g ] f d x ,
Ω g σ x ψ f = Ω g ψ D [ f ] + ψ D r [ g ] f d x ,
for all f , g C 1 ( Ω ¯ , H ) . Here d represents the exterior differentiation operator, d x is the differential form of the 4-dimensional volume in R 4 and
σ x ψ : = s g n ψ k = 0 3 ( 1 ) k ψ k d x ^ k
is the quaternionic differential form of the 3-dimensional volume in R 4 according to ψ , where d x ^ k = d x 0 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 omitting factor d x k . In addition, s g n ψ is 1, or 1 , if ψ and ψ s t d : = { 1 , i , j , k } have the same orientation, or not, respectively. Note that, | σ x ψ | = d S 3 is the differential form of the 3-dimensional volume in R 4 and write σ x = σ x ψ s t d . Let us recall that the ψ -Cauchy Kernel is given by
K ψ ( τ x ) = 1 2 π 2 τ ψ x ψ ¯ | τ ψ x ψ | 4 .

3. A Function Theory Generated by a β -Proportional Fractal Fueter Operator

Let us extend Definition 4 to a quaternionic differential operator associate to an arbitrary structural set ψ .
Definition 5.
Let Ω H a domain. Fix β = ( β 0 , β 1 , β 2 , β 3 ) [ 0 , 1 ] 4 and ν = ( ν 0 , ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 ) where ν k ( η k , x k ) is a fractal measure for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 according to Definition 1. Denote χ 1 = ( χ 0 , 1 , χ 1 , 1 , χ 2 , 1 , χ 3 , 1 ) , χ 0 = ( χ 0 , 0 , χ 1 , 0 , χ 2 , 0 , χ 3 , 0 ) and σ = ( σ 0 , σ 1 , σ 2 , σ 3 ) [ 0 , 1 ] 4 where χ k , 1 ( σ k , x k ) and χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) and are given by Definition 3 on coordinate x k for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Let f : Ω H such that ν n β n f ( x ) ( x n ) η n exists for all x Ω and all n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . Then, the quaternionic ψ-proportional β-fractal derivative of f with respect to ν and σ, is given by
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n ν n σ n , β n f ( x ) ( x n ) η n = n = 0 3 ψ n χ n , 1 ( σ n , x n ) f ( x ) + χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) ν n β n f ( x ) ( x n ) η n = n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m χ n , 1 ( σ n , x n ) f m ( x ) + χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) ν n β n f m ( x ) ( x n ) η n .
Proposition 1.
Given f C 1 ( Ω , H ) as above let us assume that
λ ν n β n ( f m ) ( x ) : = 0 x n ν n β n f m ( x ) ( t n ) η n d t , λ ν n β n ( f ) ( x ) : = m = 0 3 ψ m 0 x n ν n β n f m ( x ) ( t n ) η n d t
exist for n , m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . Under conditions χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) 0 and λ ν n β n ( f m ) ( x ) 0 for all x = ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) Ω and all m , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 we have
ψ D L ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) + E ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ ν n β n ( f m ) ( x ) ,
for all x Ω , where
E ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n ( χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) ) λ ν k β k ( f ) ( x ) , L ν σ , β ( f ) ( x ) = k = 0 3 ( χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) ) λ ν k β k ( f ) ( x ) , L n , m [ f ] ( x ) : = x n χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) e h n , m ( x ) e h n , m ( x ) , h n , m ( x ) = 0 x n χ n , 1 ( σ n , t n ) χ n , 0 ( σ n , t n ) f m λ ν n β n ( f m ) d t ,
for n , m { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } .
Proof. 
To simplify notation consider λ n = λ ν n β n for all n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . From direct computations we have that
x n ( e h n , m ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) ) = e h n , m ( x ) χ n , 1 ( σ n , x n ) χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) f m λ n ( f m ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) + ν n β n f m ( x ) ( x n ) η n = e h n , m ( x ) χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) χ n , 1 ( σ n , t n ) f m + χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) ν n β n f m ( x ) ( x n ) η n = e h n , m ( x ) χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) ν n σ n , β n f m ( x ) ( x n ) η n , ν n σ n , β n f m ( x ) ( x n ) η n = χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) e h n , m ( x ) x n e h n , m ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) .
Therefore,
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) e h n , m ( x ) x n e h n , m ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) = n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m x n ( χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) ) ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n x n ( χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) m = 0 3 ψ m λ n ( f m ) ( x ) ) ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n x n χ n , 0 ( σ n , x n ) λ n ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n x n ς ( x ) λ n ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 3 ψ n x n κ n λ n ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) ,
where ς ( x ) = = 0 3 χ , 0 ( σ , x ) and κ n = = 0 n 3 χ , 0 ( σ , x ) .
Then
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n ς ( x ) k = 0 3 λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n ς ( x ) λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 3 ψ n x n k = 0 3 κ k λ k ( f ) ( x ) + n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n κ k λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) .
As a consequence we have that
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n ς ( x ) k = 0 3 λ k ( f ) ( x ) k = 0 3 κ k λ k ( f ) ( x ) + n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n κ k λ k ( f ) ( x ) ς ( x ) λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) ,
i.e.,
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n k = 0 3 ( χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) ) λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n ( χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) ) λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x )
or equivalently
ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) : = ψ D L ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) n = 0 = k n k 3 ψ n x n ( χ k , 0 ( σ k , x k ) ) λ k ( f ) ( x ) n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( x ) λ n ( f m ) ( x ) .
Notation L n , m and h n for all n , m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , can be improved but we have decided to keep it at this level to make easier to write and read the following computations.
Definition 6.
For δ = ( δ 0 , δ 1 , δ 2 , δ 3 ) [ 0 , 1 ] 4 , and μ = ( μ 0 , μ 1 , μ 2 , μ 3 ) where μ k ( ζ k , x k ) is a fractal measure for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 according to Definition 1. Denote ϰ 1 = ( ϰ 0 , 1 , ϰ 1 , 1 , ϰ 2 , 1 , ϰ 3 , 1 ) , ϰ 0 = ( ϰ 0 , 0 , ϰ 1 , 0 , ϰ 2 , 0 , ϰ 3 , 0 ) and ρ = ( ρ 0 , ρ 1 , ρ 2 , ρ 3 ) [ 0 , 1 ] 4 where ϰ k , 1 ( ρ k , x k ) and ϰ k , 0 ( ρ k , x k ) and are given by Definition 3 for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Given g : Ω H such that μ n δ n g ( x ) ( x n ) ζ n there exists for all x Ω and all n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . The quaternionic right ψ-proportional δ-fractal derivative of g with respect to μ and ρ, is given by
ψ D r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) : = n = 0 3 μ n ρ n , δ n g ( x ) ( x n ) ζ n ψ n = n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n ϰ n , 1 ( ρ n , x n ) g m ( x ) + ϰ n , 0 ( ρ n , x n ) μ n δ n g m ( x ) ( x n ) ζ n .
Remark 3.
Consider g : Ω H such that
λ μ n δ n ( g m ) ( x ) = 0 x n μ n δ n g m ( x ) ( t n ) ζ n d t , λ μ n δ n ( g ) ( x ) = m = 0 3 ψ m 0 x n μ n δ n g m ( x ) ( t n ) ζ n d t
there exist for n , m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . If ϰ n , 0 ( ρ n , x n ) 0 and λ μ n δ n ( g m ) ( x ) 0 for all x = ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) Ω and all n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , then repeating several computations of the previous proof we can see that
ψ D r L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) : = ψ D r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) + E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n T n , m [ g ] ( x ) λ μ n δ n ( g m ) ( x ) ,
for all x Ω , where
E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) : = n = 0 = k n k 3 x n ( ϰ k , 0 ( ρ k , x k ) ) λ μ k δ k ( g ) ( x ) ψ n L μ ρ , δ ( g ) ( x ) = k = 0 3 ( ϰ k , 0 ( ρ k , x k ) ) λ ν k δ k ( g ) ( x ) , T n , m [ g ] ( x ) : = x n ( ϰ n , 0 ( ρ n , x n ) e l n , m ( x ) ) e l n , m ( x ) , l n , m ( x ) = 0 x n ϰ n , 1 ( ρ n , t n ) ϰ n , 0 ( ρ n , t n ) g m λ μ n δ n ( g m ) d t ,
for n , m { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } .
Assuming hypothesis and notations of Proposition 1 and Remark 3 let us present some consequences of quatertionic Borel-Pompeiu and Stokes formulas.
Proposition 2.
Let Ω H be a domain such that Ω is a 3-dimensional smooth surface. If L ν σ , β [ f ] , L μ ρ , δ [ g ] C 1 ( Ω , H ) then
Ω ( K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ L ν σ , β [ f ] ( τ ) + L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( τ ) σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] ( y ) ψ D r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y Ω K ψ ( y x ) E ν σ , β [ f ] ( y ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( y ) λ ν n β n ( f m ) ( y ) d y Ω E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n T n , m [ g ] ( y ) λ μ n δ n ( g m ) ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = L ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) + L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯ ,
and
Ω L μ ρ , δ [ g ] σ x ψ L ν σ , β [ f ] = Ω L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ψ D ν σ , β [ f ] + ψ D r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] L ν σ , β [ f ] d x + + Ω L μ ρ , δ [ g ] E ν σ , β [ f ] + n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] λ ν n β n ( f m ) d x + Ω E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] + n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n T n , m [ g ] λ μ n δ n ( g m ) L ν σ , β [ f ] d x .
Proof. 
The formulas follow by application of quaternionic Borel-Pompieu and Stokes formula, functions L ν σ , β [ f ] , L μ ρ , δ [ g ] and the usage of identities given in Proposition 1 and Remark 3. □
Remark 4.
In case in which L ν σ , β and L μ ρ , δ are invertible operators we can improve formula (6) to obtain the quaternionc values of f and g. In addition, if f Ker ( ψ D ν σ , β ) and g Ker ( ψ D r , μ ρ , δ ) then
Ω ( K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ L ν σ , β [ f ] ( τ ) + L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( τ ) σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) E ν σ , β [ f ] ( y ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] ( y ) λ ν n β n ( f m ) ( y ) d y Ω E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) + n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n T n , m [ g ] ( y ) λ μ n δ n ( g m ) ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = L ν σ , β [ f ] ( x ) + L μ ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯ ,
and
Ω L μ ρ , δ [ g ] σ x ψ L ν σ , β [ f ] = Ω L μ ρ , δ [ g ] E ν σ , β [ f ] + n = 0 = m 3 ψ n ψ m L n , m [ f ] λ ν n β n ( f m ) d x + Ω E r , μ ρ , δ [ g ] + n = 0 = m 3 ψ m ψ n T n , m [ g ] λ μ n δ n ( g m ) L ν σ , β [ f ] d x .

4. Quaternionic β -Proportional Fractal Fueter Operator with Truncated Exponential Fractal Measure

From now on, partial differential operators given by Remarks 1 and 2 are considered, and let k : = ( k 0 , k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) N 4 , σ = ( σ 0 , σ 1 , σ 2 , σ 3 ) , β = ( β 0 , β 1 , β 2 , β 3 ) [ 0 , 1 ] 4 , α = ( α 0 , α 1 , α 2 , α 3 ) ( 0 , 1 ] and for n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Let Ω H be a domain and f C 1 ( Ω , R ) . We will use the proportional β n -fractal partial derivatives
σ n , β n f x α n , k n ( x ) : = ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f β n x n ( x ) e ( x n α n ) k n x n ,
for all x = n = 0 3 ψ x n Ω .
Definition 7.
Let Ω H be a domain. Given f = = 0 3 ψ f C 1 ( Ω , H ) , where f 0 , f 1 , f 2 , f 3 are real valued functions. Define
( ψ D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) : = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ σ n , β n f x α n , k n ( x )
= n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f β n x n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n ,
H α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) : = 0 x n σ n 1 σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) 1 β n d x n
and to simplify the notation in the proof of the next statement use h n , ( x ) = H α n , k n σ n , β n ( f ) ( x ) for all n , = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . In addition,
T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) : = x n σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n , ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k ψ n x n I β [ f ] ( x ) ,
where I β n [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 3 ψ f ( x ) β n for all x Ω and n , = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 .
Proposition 3.
Given f = = 0 3 ψ f C 1 ( Ω , H ) . Then
ψ D = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) = ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) ,
for all x Ω .
Proof. 
x n e h n , ( x n ) f ( x ) β n = 1 σ n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n ( f ( x ) ) 1 β n f β n ( x ) + f β n x n ( x ) e h n , ( x ) = ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f β n x n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n 1 σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n , σ n , β n x α n , k n f ( x ) = σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n x n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n
and
( ψ D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n σ n , β n x α n , k n f ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n x n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n .
The identities
x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) β n = x n σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n = x n σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n + σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n x n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n
and
σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n x n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n = x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) β n x n σ n e h n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n , ( x ) f ( x ) β n = x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) β n T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) ( x )
imply that
( ψ D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) β n T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n f ( x ) β n n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n = 0 3 ψ f ( x ) β n n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) = n = 0 3 ψ n x n σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n I β n [ f ] ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) .
For each n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 we see that
σ n d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n I β n [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) = 0 n 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) .
Therefore,
ψ D = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) = ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) + = 0 = n n 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k ψ n x n I β [ f ] ( x ) .
Remark 5.
Denote v = ( v 0 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) N 4 , ρ = ( ρ 0 , ρ 1 , ρ 2 , ρ 3 ) , δ = ( δ 0 , δ 1 , δ 2 , δ 3 ) ( 0 , 1 ] 4 , γ = ( γ 0 , γ 1 , γ 2 , γ 3 ) ( 0 , 1 ] 4 and for n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . We will use the the proportional δ n -fractal partial derivative ρ n , δ n x γ n , k n . Recall that if g C 1 ( Ω , R ) then
ρ n , δ n g x γ n , k n ( x ) : = ( 1 ρ n ) g ( x ) + ρ n g δ n x n ( x ) e ( x n γ n ) k n x n ,
for all x = n = 0 3 ψ x n Ω .
If g = = 0 3 ψ g C 1 ( Ω , H ) , where g 0 , g 1 , g 2 , g 3 are real valued functions. Define the right version of the operator given by (8) as follows:
( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) : = n = 0 = 3 ψ ρ n , δ n g x γ n , m n ( x ) ψ n , H γ n , k n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( x ) : = 0 x n ρ n 1 ρ n d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n g ( x ) 1 δ n d x n .
and use j n , ( x ) = H α n , k n σ n , β n ( g ) ( x ) for all n , = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . Denote
S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( x ) : = x n ρ n e j n , ( x ) d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n e j n , ( x ) g ( x ) δ n , ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) : = = 0 = n n 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m x n I δ [ g ] ( x ) ψ n .
From similar computations to presented in the previous proof we can obtain the right version of (11):
ψ D r = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( x ) = ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) + n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) ,
for all x Ω
Corollary 1.
Let Ω H be a domain such that Ω is a 3-dimensional smooth surface. In agreement with notation in Definition 7 and Remark 5 we have:
(1)
If β = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) then operators given in Definition 7 are represented as follows:
( ψ D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f x n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n , h n ( x ) = H α n , k n σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = σ n 1 σ n e ( x n α n ) k n 1 , T α n , k n σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = x n σ n e h n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n ( x ) f ( x ) , I 1 [ f ] = f ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k ψ n x n f ( x ) ,
for all x Ω and (11) becomes at
ψ D = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k f ( x ) = ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + A ( x ) f ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) ,
where
A ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n σ n e h n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n α n ) k n e h n ( x ) ,
for all x Ω . Another important cases are the following:
(a)
If β = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and k = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) then
( ψ D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f x n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 , h n ( x ) = H α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = σ n 1 σ n x n α n , T α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = x n σ n e h n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 e h n ( x ) f ( x ) , I 1 [ f ] = f ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 σ α x α 1 ψ n x n f ( x ) ,
for all x Ω and (11) becomes at
ψ D = 0 3 σ α x α 1 f ( x ) = ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + A ( x ) f ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) ,
where
A ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n σ n e h n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 e h n ( x ) ,
for all x Ω .
(b)
If β = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and k = ( , , , ) then
( D α , k σ , β f ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ ( 1 σ n ) f ( x ) + σ n f x n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 e x n α n , h n ( x ) = H α n , σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = σ n 1 σ n e x n α n 1 , T α n , σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) = x n σ n e h n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 e x n α n e h n ( x ) f ( x ) , I 1 [ f ] = f ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 σ α x α 1 e x α ψ n x n f ( x ) ,
for all x Ω and (11) becomes at
ψ D = 0 3 σ α x α 1 e x α f ( x ) = ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + A ( x ) f ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) ,
where
A ( x ) : = n = 0 3 ψ n x n σ n e h n ( x ) α n x n α n 1 e x n α n e h n ( x ) ,
for all x Ω .
(2)
If δ = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) then the operators given in Remark 5 are represented by
( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ ρ n , 1 g x γ n , m n ( x ) ψ n , j n ( x ) = H γ n , k n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = ρ n 1 ρ n e ( x n γ n ) m n 1 , S γ n , m n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = x n ρ n e j n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n e j n ( x ) g ( x ) , ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m x n g ( x ) ψ n
and identity (12) is
ψ D r = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m g ( x ) = ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) + g ( x ) B ( x ) + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) ,
where
B ( x ) = n = 0 3 x n ρ n e j n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n e j n ( x ) ψ n ,
for all x Ω .
(a)
If δ = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) then the operators given in Remark 5 are represented by
( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ ρ n , 1 g x γ n , m n ( x ) ψ n , j n ( x ) = H γ n , k n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = ρ n 1 ρ n e ( x n γ n ) m n 1 , S γ n , m n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = x n ρ n e j n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n e j n ( x ) g ( x ) , ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m x n g ( x ) ψ n
and identity (12) is
ψ D r = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m g ( x ) = ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) + g ( x ) B ( x ) + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) ,
where
B ( x ) = n = 0 3 x n ρ n e j n ( x ) d d x n e ( x n γ n ) m n e j n ( x ) ψ n ,
for all x Ω .
(b)
If δ = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and m = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) then the operators given in Remark 5 are represented by
( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ ρ n , 1 g x γ n , 1 ( x ) ψ n , j n ( x ) = H γ n , k n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = ρ n 1 ρ n x n γ n , S γ n , 1 ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = x n ρ n e j n ( x ) γ n x n γ n 1 e j n ( x ) g ( x ) , ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 ρ γ x γ 1 x n g ( x ) ψ n
and identity (12) is
ψ D r = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 g ( x ) = ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) + g ( x ) B ( x ) + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) ,
where
B ( x ) = n = 0 3 x n ρ n e j n ( x ) γ n x n γ n 1 e j n ( x ) ψ n ,
for all x Ω .
(c)
If δ = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and m = ( , , , ) then the operators given in Remark 5 are represented by
( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) = n = 0 = 3 ψ ρ n , 1 g x γ n , ( x ) ψ n , j n ( x ) = H γ n , k n ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = ρ n 1 ρ n e x n γ n 1 , S γ n , ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) = x n ρ n e j n ( x ) γ n x n γ n 1 e x n γ n e j n ( x ) g ( x ) , ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) = = 0 = n n 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ x n g ( x ) ψ n
and identity (12) is
ψ D r = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ g ( x ) = ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) + g ( x ) B ( x ) + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) ,
where
B ( x ) = n = 0 3 x n ρ n e j n ( x ) γ n x n γ n 1 e x n γ n e j n ( x ) ψ n ,
for all x Ω .
Proposition 4.
Let Ω H be a domain such that Ω is a 3-dimensional smooth surface. In agreement with notation in Definition 7 and Remark 5 let f = = 0 3 ψ f , g = = 0 3 ψ g C 1 ( Ω , H ) , where f , g are real valued functions. Then
Ω K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ = 0 3 σ d d τ e ( τ α ) k I β [ f ] ( τ ) + Ω = 0 3 ρ d d τ e ( τ γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( τ ) σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( y ) + ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y Ω K ψ ( y x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( y ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( y ) d y Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( y ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) + = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( x ) , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯ .
In addition,
Ω = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] σ x ψ = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) = Ω g ( ψ D α , k ρ , β f ) ( x ) + ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ g ) ( x ) f ( x d x + Ω g ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) d x + Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) f ( x ) d x
Proof. 
It is a direct consequence of Definition 7 and Remark 5 using functions
= 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) and = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( x ) and identities (11) and (12) in formulas (2) and (3). □
Remark 6.
In formulas (13) and (14), the operators ψ D α , k ρ , β and ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ reflect the phenomenon of duality in quaternionic analysis due to the non-commutativity of quaterinonic algebra.
Corollary 2.
Let Ω H be a domain such that Ω is a 3-dimensional smooth surface. In agreement with notation in Definition 7 and Remark 5 let f = = 0 3 ψ f , g = = 0 3 ψ g C 1 ( Ω , H ) , where f , g are real valued functions. Suppose that f Ker ( ψ D α , k ρ , β ) and g Ker ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ ) . Then
Ω K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ = 0 3 σ d d τ e ( τ α ) k I β [ f ] ( τ ) + Ω = 0 3 ρ d d τ e ( τ γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( τ ) σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( y ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( y ) d y Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( y ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) + = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] ( x ) , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯
and
Ω = 0 3 ρ d d x e ( x γ ) m I δ [ g ] σ x ψ = 0 3 σ d d x e ( x α ) k I β [ f ] ( x ) = Ω g ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , k n σ n , β n [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) d x + Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , m n ρ n , δ n [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) f ( x ) d x
Corollary 3.
Let Ω H be a domain such that Ω is a 3-dimensional smooth surface. In agreement with notation in Definition 7 and Remark 5 let f = = 0 3 ψ f , g = = 0 3 ψ g C 1 ( Ω , H ) , where f , g are real valued functions. Suppose that f Ker ( ψ D α , k ρ , β ) and g Ker ( ψ D r , γ , m ρ , δ ) . For fix β = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and δ = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) we have:
(1)
If k = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and m = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) , then
Ω K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ = 0 3 σ α τ α 1 f ( τ ) + Ω g ( τ ) = 0 3 ρ γ τ γ 1 σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( y ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( y ) d y Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , 1 ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( y ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = f ( x ) = 0 3 σ α x α 1 + g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯
and
Ω g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 σ x ψ = 0 3 σ α x α 1 f ( x ) = Ω g ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) d x + Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , 1 ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) f ( x ) d x ,
where operators T α n , 1 σ n , 1 , ψ W α , k σ , β , S γ n , 1 ρ n , 1 and ψ V γ , m ρ , δ are represented in Corollary 1.
(2)
If k = ( , , , ) and m = ( , , , ) , then
Ω K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ = 0 3 σ α τ α 1 e τ α f ( τ ) + Ω g ( τ ) = 0 3 ρ γ τ γ 1 e τ γ σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , σ n , 1 [ f ] ( y ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( y ) d y Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( y ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = f ( x ) = 0 3 σ α x α 1 e x α + g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯
and
Ω g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ σ x ψ = 0 3 σ α x α 1 e x α f ( x ) = Ω g ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) d x + Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) f ( x ) d x ,
where T α n , σ n , 1 , ψ W α , k σ , β , S γ n , ρ n , 1 and ψ V γ , m ρ , δ are given in Corollary 1.
(3)
If k = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) and m = ( , , , ) , then
Ω K ψ ( τ x ) σ τ ψ = 0 3 σ α τ α 1 f ( τ ) + Ω g ( τ ) = 0 3 ρ γ τ γ 1 e τ γ σ τ ψ K ψ ( τ x ) Ω K ψ ( y x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( y ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( y ) d y Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( y ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( y ) K ψ ( y x ) d y = f ( x ) = 0 3 σ α x α 1 + g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ , x Ω , 0 , x H Ω ¯
and
Ω g ( x ) = 0 3 ρ γ x γ 1 e x γ σ x ψ = 0 3 σ α x α 1 f ( x ) = Ω g ( x ) n = 0 = 3 ψ n ψ T α n , 1 σ n , 1 [ f ] ( x ) + ψ W α , k σ , β [ f ] ( x ) d x + Ω n = 0 = 3 ψ S γ n , ρ n , 1 [ g ] ( x ) ψ n + ψ V γ , m ρ , δ [ g ] ( x ) f ( x ) d x ,
where operators T α n , 1 σ n , 1 , ψ W α , k σ , β , S γ n , ρ n , 1 and ψ V γ , m ρ , δ are given in Corollary 1.
(4)
For k = ( , , , ) and m = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) a similar result is in fact true.

5. Discussion

This paper establishes the foundations of a quaternionic function theory associated to a proportional and fractional-fractal ψ -Fueter operator associated to a fractal measure. Also this work extends the quaternionic hiperholomorphic function theory. So what other results can be extended to this recent function theory?

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Instituto Politécnico Nacional (grant numbers SIP20241638, SIP20241237) and CONAHCYT (grant number 1077475).

Conflicts of Interest

“ The authors declare that they have no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.”

References

  1. Alaoui, H.; Sadek, L. A new definition of the fractal derivative with classical properties. Hal Open science 2022, hal-03684970. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balankin, A.S.; Mena, B. Vector differential operators in a fractional dimensional space, on fractals, and in fractal continua. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2023, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, W. Time-space fabric underlying anomalous diffusion. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2006, 28, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Sun, H.; Zhang, X.; Korošak, D. Anomalous diffusion modeling by fractal and fractional derivatives. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 1754–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deppman, A.; Megías, E.; Pasechnik, R. Fractal derivatives, fractional derivatives and q-deformed calculus. Entropy 2023, 25, Paper. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, J.H. A new fractal derivation. Therm. Sci. 2011, 15, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jeffery, R.L. Generalized integrals with respect to functions of bounded variation. Canadian J. Math. 1958, 10, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hattaf, K. A New Class of Generalized Fractal and Fractal-Fractional Derivatives with Non-Singular Kernels. Fractal and Fractional 2023, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Machado, J.T.; Kiryakova, V.; Mainardi, F. Recent history of fractional calculus. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16, 1140–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional integrals and derivatives. Theory and applications; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Yverdon, 1993; pp. xxxvi+976.
  11. Oldham, K.; Spanier, J. The Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applications of Differentiation and Integration to Arbitrary Order; Dover books on mathematics, Dover Publications, 2006.
  12. Podlubny, I. Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Mathematics in Science and Engineering 1999, 198. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bory-Reyes, J.; Pérez-de la Rosa, M.A. Local fractional Moisil-Teodorescu operator in quaternionic setting involving Cantor-type coordinate systems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bory-Reyes, J.; Pérez-de la Rosa, M.A.; Peña-Pérez, Y. Fractional Moisil-Teodorescu operator in elasticity and electromagnetism. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2022, 61, 6811–6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. González-Cervantes, J.O.; Bory-Reyes, J. A quaternionic fractional Borel-Pompeiu type formula. Fractal 2022, 30, 2025–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. González-Cervantes, J.O.; Bory-Reyes, J. A fractional Borel-Pompeiu type formula and a related fractional ψ-Fueter operator with respect to a vector-valued function. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2023, 46, 2012–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. González-Cervantes, J.O.; Bory-Reyes, J.; Sabadini, I. Fractional slice regular functions of a quaternionic variable. Results Math. 2024, 79, Paper. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. González-Cervantes, J.O.; Nuñez-Olmedo, L.G.; Bory-Reyes, J.; Sabadini, I. An approach to slice regular functions via post-quantum calculus theory. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2024, 00, 0000–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. González-Cervantes, J.O.; Pérez-de la Rosa, M.A.; Bory-Reyes, J. Bergman theory induced by a quaternionic perturbed fractional Fueter operator. Ukrainian Math. J. 2024, 00, 0000–1111. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Rashid, S.; Hammouch, Z. More properties of the proportional fractional integrals and derivatives of a function with respect to another function. Adv. Difference Equ. 2020, pp. Paper No. 303, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shapiro, M.; Vasilevski, N.L. Quaternionic ψ-monogenic functions, singular operators and boundary value problems. I. ψ-Hyperholomorphy function theory. Compl. Var. Theory Appl.
  22. Shapiro, M.; Vasilevski, N. Quaternionic ψ-hyperholomorphic functions, singular operators and boundary value problems II. Algebras of singular integral operators and Riemann type boundary value problems. Compl. Var. Theory Appl. 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sudbery, A. Quaternionic analysis. Math. Proc. Phil. Soc. 1979, 85, 199–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. N<i>o</i>^no, K. On the quaternion linearization of Laplacian Δ. Bull. Fukuoka Univ. Ed. III 1985, 35, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  25. N<i>o</i>^no, K. Hyperholomorphic functions of a quaternion variable. Bull. Fukuoka Univ. Ed. III 1982, 32, 21–37. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated