Submitted:
24 February 2025
Posted:
25 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The current survey aimed to analyse the water quality from wells in a rural area situated in the north-east of Romania, comprising the main water source for human consumption in the area. 80 wells were analysed for total dissolved solids, which was used as the main indicator of water quality and followed by measurements of dissolved oxygen and saturation, salinity, conductivity, redox potential and pH . For comparison, the values of these parameters were also measured in the water from the public network of the cities of Iasi and Botosani, as well as in various brands of bottled water. The results highlighted important water quality issues in rural areas, especially in terms of microbiological contamination and high nitrate levels, urging the need for future measures to improve the local infrastructure and water treatment systems. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the challenges related to ensuring drinking water in rural communities and provide a basis for developing effective public policies in water resources management.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
3. Results and Discussions
- (a)
- Dissolved oxygen and oxygen saturation
- (b)
- Oxidation-reduction potential and temperature
- (c)
- Salinity and pH
- (d)
- TDS and conductivity


4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| °dH | degree of German hardness |
| CFU | colony-forming unit |
| DO | dissolved oxygen |
| EPA | Environmental Protection Agency |
| NTU | Nephelometric Turbidity Unit |
| ORP | oxidation-reduction potential |
| TDS | total dissolved solids |
| TH | total hardness |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
References
- Abanyie, S.K.; Apea, O.B.; Abagale, S.A.; Amuah, E.E.Y.; Sunkari, E.D. Sources and Factors Influencing Groundwater Quality and Associated Health Implications: A Review. Emerg. Contam. 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merritt, P.; Power, C. Assessing the Long-Term Evolution of Mine Water Quality in Abandoned Underground Mine Workings Using First-Flush Based Models. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krishnamoorthy, L.; Lakshmanan, V.R. Groundwater Quality Assessment Using Machine Learning Models: A Comprehensive Study on the Industrial Corridor of a Semi-Arid Region. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Shi, J.; Ma, T.; Xie, X.; Deng, Y.; Du, Y.; Gan, Y.; Guo, Z.; Dong, Y.; et al. Groundwater Quality and Health: Making the Invisible Visible. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qureshi, S.S.; Channa, A.; Memon, S.A.; Khan, Q.; Jamali, G.A.; Panhwar, A.; Saleh, T.A. Assessment of Physicochemical Characteristics in Groundwater Quality Parameters. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iefremova, I.; Lomakina, I.; Obiiukh, N. Groundwater Protection as an Essential Component of Water Management in the European Union in the Light of Modern Integration Processes: Legal Aspects of the Problem. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panahi, M.; Sadhasivam, N.; Pourghasemi, H.R.; Rezaie, F.; Lee, S. Spatial Prediction of Groundwater Potential Mapping Based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR). J. Hydrol. 2020, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Alfy, M.; Lashin, A.; Al-Arifi, N.; Al-Bassam, A. Groundwater Characteristics and Pollution Assessment Using Integrated Hydrochemical Investigations GIS and Multivariate Geostatistical Techniques in Arid Areas. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber-Scannell, P.K.; Duffy, L.K. Effects of Total Dissolved Solids on Aquatic Organisms: A Review of Literature and Recommendation for Salmonid Species. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, J.; Heo, J.; Kim, C. Machine Learning Algorithms for Water Quality Management Using Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Data Analysis. Water (Switzerland) 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- F: Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2022.
- WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Vol 2, 2nd Ed. World Heal. Organiztion, Geneva 1996, 2, 132–388.
- Chilima, G.; Nkhoma, B.; Chavula, G.; Mulwafu, W. Community Based Management Approach in the Management of Water Resources By Different Organisations in the Lake Chilwa Basin, Malawi. Basis 2001, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Rasool, A.; Saeed, S.; Ahmad, S.; Iqbal, A.; Ali, A. Empowering Community Participation for Sustainable Rural Water Supply: Navigating Water Scarcity in Karak District Pakistan. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 26, 101269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roba, C.; Bǎlc, R.; Creţa, F.; Andreica, D.; Pǎdurean, A.; Pogǎcean, P.; Chertes, T.; Moldovan, F.; Mocan, B.; Roşu, C. Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Nw of Romania and Its Suitability for Drinking and Agricultural Purposes. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2021, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derry, A.M.; Prepas, E.E.; Hebert, P.D.N. A Comparison of Zooplankton Communities in Saline Lakewater with Variable Anion Composition. Hydrobiologia 2003, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stekoll, M.S.; Smoker, W.W.; Failor-Rounds, B.J.; Wang, I.A.; Joyce, V.J. Response of the Early Developmental Stages of Hatchery Reared Salmonids to Major Ions in a Simulated Mine Effluent. Aquaculture 2009, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erickson, R.J.; Benoit, D.A.; Mattson, V.R.; Nelson, H.P.; Leonard, E.N. The Effects of Water Chemistry on the Toxicity of Copper to Fathead Minnows. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoss, V.J.; Büyükhatipoglu, S.; Holtz, W. Der Einfluß Bestimmter Elektrolyte Auf Die Bewegungsauslösung Bei Spermatozoen Der Regenbogenforelle (Salmo Gairdneri). Reprod. Domest. Anim. 1977, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Florica Breşug, V.M. Pagini Monografice. Comuna Lunca, Judeţul Botoşani. 2016.
- Kumar, S.; Veerwal, B.; Sharma, D.; Verma, B.K. Review on Physicochemical Parameters of Water Concerning Their Effect on Biotic Population. Indian Hydrobiol. 2022, 21, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
- British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy. B.C. Source Drinking Water Quality Guidelines: Guideline Summary. 9780.
- Suslow, T. V. Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) for Water Disinfection Monitoring, Control, and Documentation, 2004.








| Year | Wells Analyzed | Non-Compliant Samples | Microbiological Determinations | Non-Compliant Microbiological Determinations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 117 | 68 | 457 | 167 |
| 2013 | 105 | 58 | 356 | 127 |
| 2014 | 107 | 67 | 353 | 146 |
| Parameter | Standard Used |
|---|---|
| Number of Colonies at 37°C | SREN ISO 6222/2004 |
| coliform Bacteria | SREN ISO 9308-1/2009 |
| Escherichia coli | SREN ISO 9308-1/2009 |
| Enterococci | SREN ISO 7899-2/2009 |
| Ammonium | SR ISO 7150-1/2001 |
| Nitrites | SREN 26777 C 91/2006 |
| Nitrates | SR ISO 7890-3/2000 |
| Oxidability | SREN ISO 8467/2001 |
| pH | SR ISO 10533/2009 |
| Hardness | SR ISO 6059/2008 |
| Turbidity | SR EN ISO 7027/1999 |
| Year | Sample | Parameter | Result | Admissible Value | Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 – “Preventing Blue Death” Project | Police Well - Baznoasa | Number of Colonies (37°C) | 20 cfu/mL | - | ✔ |
| Coliform Bacteria | 20 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Escherichia coli | 18 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Enterococci | 950 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Ammonium | 0 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrites | 0.036 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrates | 98.6 mg L-1 | ≤ 50 mg L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Oxidability | 1.27 mg L-1 | ≤ 5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| pH | 7.18 | 6.5 - 9.5 | ✔ | ||
| Cultural Center Well - Lunca | Number of Colonies (37°C) | 65 cfu mL-1 | - | ✔ | |
| Coliform Bacteria | 500 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Escherichia coli | 250 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Enterococci | 700 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Ammonium | 0 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrites | 0.044 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrates | 58.6 mg L-1 | ≤ 50 mg L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Oxidability | 3.16 mg L-1 | ≤ 5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| pH | 7.38 | 6.5 - 9.5 | ✔ | ||
| 2013 – Lunca-Botosani Area | Well at Zlatunoaia Secondary School | Coliform Bacteria | 1.7 × 10 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ |
| Escherichia coli | 2.5 × 10 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Enterococci | 9 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Nitrates | 179 mg L-1 | ≤ 50 mg L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Hardness | 51 °dH | ≥ 50 °dH | ✔ | ||
| Turbidity | 1.67 NTU | ≤ 5 NTU | ✔ | ||
| Well at Baznoasa Primary School | Coliform Bacteria | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ | |
| Escherichia coli | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Enterococci | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrates | 284 mg L-1 | ≤ 50 mg L-1 | ❌ | ||
| Hardness | 77 °dH | ≥ 50 °dH | ✔ | ||
| Turbidity | 1.63 NTU | ≤ 5 NTU | ✔ | ||
| 2014 – “Preventing Blue Death” Project | Drilled Well, Lunca Village | Coliform Bacteria | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ |
| Escherichia coli | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Enterococci | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | 0 cfu 100m L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Ammonium | 0.3 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Nitrites | 0.08 mg L-1 | ≤ 0.5 mg | ✔ | ||
| Nitrates | 0.74 mg L-1 | ≤ 50 mg L-1 | ✔ | ||
| Turbidity | 2.53 NTU | ≤ 5 NTU | ✔ |
| Brand | Na (mg L-1) |
Mg (mg L-1) |
Ca (mg L-1) |
K (mg L-1) |
pH | HCO3 | Dry residue at 180°C | Sulphate | CO2 minimum | Chloride |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA CARPATICA still natural mineral water |
0.78 | 14.3 | 44.9 | 7.7 | 199.5 | |||||
| AQUA CARPATICA natural sparkling mineral water |
5.3 | 78.1 | 286 | 1281 | 2500 | |||||
| CARPATICA still natural mineral water |
0.82 | 1.328 | 64.34 | 0.501 | 7.76 | 201.3 | 202 | 21.23 | 300 | |
| CARPATICA natural sparkling mineral water |
22.39 | 41.68 | 117.4 | 5.371 | 6.65 | 543 | 475 | 300 | 10.64 | |
| PERLA HARGHITEI still natural mineral water |
8.22 | 10.6 | 109 | 1.67 | 457 | 17.5 | 17 | |||
| PERLA HARGHITEI natural sparkling mineral water |
61.92 | 40.91 | 112.9 | 10.57 | 732 | 2.83 | 3500 | 14.77 | ||
| BUCOVINA still natural mineral water |
2.88 | 2.63 | 9.56 | 1.18 | 7.05 | 48.8 | 74 | |||
| BUCOVINA natural sparkling mineral water |
26.72 | 76.73 | 264.5 | 4.32 | 5.3 | 1189 | 951 | |||
| VALEA IZVOARELOR still natural mineral water |
92.5 | 9.42 | 47.42 | 7.56 | 306.1 | 474 | 93.9 | |||
| VALEA IZVOARELOR natural sparkling mineral water |
93 | 9.66 | 47.02 | 5 | 306.1 | 464.5 | 93.6 | |||
| BORSEC still natural mineral water |
2.54 | 29.5 | 58 | 7.42 | 312 | 275 | ||||
| WONDER still natural mineral water |
0.74 | 3.45 | 17.2 | 0.53 | 71.8 | 81.4 | ||||
| KAUFLAND still natural mineral water |
70.7 | 41.3 | 197 | 7 | 901 | 924 | 250 | 16.1 | ||
| PERLA COVASNEI natural sparkling mineral water |
85.82 | 19.91 | 35.66 | 2.59 | 5.76 | 453 | 2500 | 16.31 |
| Brand | DO (mg L-1) |
pH | Conductivity (µS cm-1) |
TDS (mg L-1) |
Salinity | ORP | DO (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATER NETWORK BOTOSANI | 8,64 | 8,05 | 393 | 197 | 0,91 | 46,2 | 76,1 |
| WATER NETWORK IASI | 8,01 | 7,75 | 566 | 283 | 0,27 | 193,2 | 73,2 |
| AQUA CARPATICA still natural mineral water |
7,08 | 7,91 | 309 | 155 | 0,15 | 80,1 | 68,4 |
| AQUA CARPATICA natural sparkling mineral water |
2,74 | 5,70 | 1603 | 802 | 0,81 | 141,3 | 17,6 |
| CARPATICA still natural mineral water |
5,93 | 7,95 | 339 | 169 | 0,16 | 46,9 | 59,3 |
| CARPATICA natural sparkling mineral water |
1,49 | 5,62 | 1049 | 524 | 0,52 | 13,9 | 27,4 |
| PERLA HARGHITEI still natural mineral water |
5,52 | 7,10 | 610 | 305 | 0,30 | 70,9 | 48,4 |
| PERLA HARGHITEI natural sparkling mineral water |
1,14 | 5,58 | 988 | 494 | 0,49 | 130,3 | 18,6 |
| BUCOVINA still natural mineral water |
4,35 | 7,63 | 100 | 50 | 0,05 | 41,6 | 42,6 |
| BUCOVINA natural sparkling mineral water |
1,57 | 5,60 | 1394 | 700 | 0,70 | 122,1 | 8,4 |
| VALEA IZVOARELOR natural sparkling mineral water |
2,03 | 5,26 | 833 | 417 | 0,41 | 138,8 | 4,4 |
| VALEA IZVOARELOR decarbonated natural mineral water |
1,93 | 6,55 | 837 | 418 | 0,41 | 71,3 | 18,1 |
| BORSEC still natural mineral water |
3,58 | 7,30 | 497 | 249 | 0,24 | 50,3 | 34,1 |
| WONDER still natural mineral water |
4,32 | 7,78 | 132 | 66 | 0,06 | 34,8 | 45,9 |
| KAUFLAND still natural mineral water |
3,70 | 6,26 | 1257 | 628 | 0,63 | 87,9 | 40,4 |
| PERLA COVASNEI natural sparkling mineral water |
1,35 | 5,34 | 571 | 285 | 0,28 | 131,4 | 13,1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).