Submitted:
21 February 2025
Posted:
21 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This study assessed the health risks of date palms in Taiwan with aerial root growth using visual tree assessment and non-destructive testing. Key external defects included leaning and insect damage, while acoustic tomography confirmed internal structural variability but required accuracy improvements. Drilling resistance tests showed that healthy trees had the highest resistance near the bark, decreasing toward the center, while decayed trees exhibited significant amplitude reductions. The phenomenon of aerial root growth on the outer side of the trunk is presumed to be a growth response of the tree to adapt to environmental changes, while the distinct dark wood band between the decayed and sound wood in the cross-section is likely a result of wood variation. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive tree health assessments and provide a scientific basis for improved urban tree management and conservation.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Procedure
2.2. Acoustic Tomography Testing
2.3. Drilling Resistance Testing
2.4. Visual Inspection of Disc Cross-Sections
3. Results
3.1. Visual Tree Assessment
3.2. Aerial Root Observations
3.3. Acoustic Tomography Analysis
3.4. Stress Wave Imaging of Decayed Date Palm
3.5. Drilling Amplitude Analysis of Healthy Date Palms
3.6. Drilling Resistance Amplitude Analysis of Disc Testing
3.7. Visual Inspection of Cross-Sectional Discs






4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kirschner, G.K.; Xiao, T.T.; Blilou, I. Rooting in the Desert: A Developmental Overview on Desert Plants. Genes 2021, 12, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schuch, U.K.; Quist, T.M. Arizona Landscape Palms and their Management. Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona. 2023, http://hdl.handle.net/10150/671215.
- Linhares, C.S.F.; Gonçalves, R.; Martins, L.M.; Knapic, S. Structural Stability of Urban Trees Using Visual and Instrumental Techniques: A Review. Forests 2021, 12, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nocetti, M.; Brunetti, M. Advancements in Wood Quality Assessment: Standing Tree Visual Evaluation - A Review. Forests 2024, 15, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.J.; Chang, T.T.; Juan, M.Y.; Lin, T.T. Detection deterioration in royal palm (Roystonea regia) using ultrasonic tomographic and resistance microdrilling techniques. J. Trop. Forest Sci. 2011, 23, 230–270. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.J.; Chung, C.H.; Wu, M.L.; Cho, C.L. Detection of Phellinus noxius decay in Sterculia foetida tree. J. Trop. Forest Sci. 2013, 25, 487–496. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.J.; Lin, P.H.; Chang, C.Y.; Gong, Q.Z. Detection of Ganoderma australe Decay in Three Acacia confusa Trees: A Case Study. Arboric. Urban For. 2025, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, I.; Alias, M.S.; Kadir, J.; Kasawani, I. Detection of basal stem rot disease at oil palm plantations using sonic tomography. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2014, 9, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
- Son, J.; Kim, S.; Shin, J.; Lee, G.; Kim, H. Reliability of nondestructive sonic tomography for detection of defects in old Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino trees. Forest Sci. and Techno. 2021, 17, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downes, G.M.; Lausberg, M.; Potts, B.M.; Pilbeam, D.L.; Bird, M.; Bradshaw, B. Application of the IML Resistograph to the infield assessment of basic density in plantation eucalypts. Aust. For. 2018, 81, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fundova, I.; Funda, T.; Wu, H.X. Non-destructive wood density assessment of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using resistograph and Pilodyn. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0204518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharapov, E.; Brischke, C.; Militz, H.; Smirnova, E. Effects of white rot and brown rot on the drilling resistance measurements in wood. Holzforschung 2018, 72, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharapov, E.; Brischke, C.; Militz, H. Assessment of preservative- treated wooden poles using drilling-resistance measurements. Forests 2020, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mana, F.A.; Ahmad, Y.A. Case study on the trunk’s deformity of date palm trees used in street landscape in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2010, 8, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sulbi, A.O. Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) trunk deformation in public landscaping: Causes and categorization. Landscape Online 2019, 65, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAKOPP Manual for the ArborSonic 3D Acoustic tomography. User’s manual v6.5. 2020, 63pp.
- Michael, M.L.; Cheong, S.Y.; Janaun, J.; Phin, C.K.; Dayou, J. A Short Report on Application of Acoustic Tomography for Basal Stem Rot Disease Severity Assessment in Oil Palm. The Planter, Kuala Lumpur 2021, 97, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivaro, S.; Matan, N.; Lam, F. Property gradients in oil palm trunk (Elaeis guineensis). J. Wood Sci. 2018, 64, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramle, S.F.M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R.; Arai, T.; Kosugi, A.; Abe, H.; Murata, Y.; Mori, Y. Parenchyma and vascular of Oil Palm. Lignocellulose 2012, 1, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
- Rinn, F. Detecting Fungal Decay in Palm Stems by Resistance Drilling. Florida Arborist, 2013a, Florida (Spring+Summer 2013).
- Rinn, F. Shell-wall thickness and breaking safety of mature trees. Western Arborist 2013b, 39 (3), 14–18 (Fall 2013).
- Lin, C.J.; Yang, T.H. Detection of acoustic velocity and electrical resistance tomographies for evaluation of peripheral-inner wood demarcation in urban royal palms. Urban For. Urban Greening 2015, 14, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.H.; Chung, C.H.; Wu, M.L.; Lin, C.J. Stress Wave Tomogram and Wood Density Profile in a Royal Palm Tree: a Case Study. Taiwan J. Forest Sci. 2013, 28, 129–44. [Google Scholar]
- Lilly, S.; Bassett, C.G.; Komen, J.; Purcell, L. Arborists’ Certification Study Guide (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). 2022, 200pp.
- Dunster, J.A.; Smiley, E.T.; Matheny, N.; Lilly, S. Tree risk assessment manual. International Society of Arboriculture. Second Edition. Champaign, Illinois, U.S. 2017, 200pp.
- Morris, H.; Brodersen, C.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R.; Jansen, S. The parenchyma of secondary xylem and Its critical role in tree defense against fungal decay in relation to the CODIT model. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris1, H.; Hietala, A.M.; Jansen, S.; Ribera, J.; Rosner, S.; Salmeia, K.A.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R. Review: Part of the focus issueon plant defence and stress response. Using the CODIT model to explain secondary metabolites of xylem in defence systems of temperate trees against decay fungi. Annals Botany 2020, 125, 701–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






| No. | H(cm) | Dia of 2D (cm) | V(m/s) | ||
| Vmax | Vmean | Vmin | |||
| s1 | 135 | 45.9 | 1329 | 1049 | 770 |
| s2 | 140 | 36.0 | 1753 | 1348 | 943 |
| s3 | 140 | 41.4 | 1424 | 967 | 510 |
| s4 | 160 | 36.9 | 1841 | 1422 | 1003 |
| s5 | 130 | 44.3 | 1493 | 1114 | 735 |
| s6 | 140 | 38.5 | 1473 | 1153 | 833 |
| s7 | 145 | 35.0 | 1617 | 1247 | 877 |
| s8 | 145 | 39.5 | 1542 | 1231 | 920 |
| s9 | 135 | 41.7 | 1402 | 1161 | 920 |
| s10 | 150 | 40.1 | 1405 | 1062 | 719 |
| s11 | 150 | 32.8 | 1766 | 1284 | 803 |
| s12 | 150 | 36.9 | 1291 | 1078 | 865 |
| s13 | 145 | 43.3 | 1479 | 1135 | 791 |
| s14 | 145 | 39.2 | 1590 | 1263 | 937 |
| s15 | 140 | 35.0 | 1876 | 1478 | 1080 |
| s16 | 140 | 40.1 | 1696 | 1384 | 1072 |
| s17 | 145 | 39.2 | 1611 | 1220 | 830 |
| s18 | 150 | 34.4 | 1696 | 1351 | 1007 |
| s19 | 135 | 35.7 | 2159 | 1663 | 1167 |
| s20 | 150 | 44.6 | 1569 | 1243 | 917 |
| s21 | 170 | 35.7 | 1673 | 1300 | 928 |
| s22 | 150 | 36.3 | 1428 | 1021 | 614 |
| s23 | 155 | 37.9 | 1463 | 1073 | 684 |
| s24 | 185 | 35.4 | 1872 | 1366 | 861 |
| s25 | 170 | 40.4 | 1376 | 1018 | 661 |
| s26 | 140 | 34.1 | 2094 | 1547 | 1000 |
| s27 | 135 | 38.5 | 1745 | 1243 | 741 |
| s28 | 150 | 28.0 | 1847 | 1275 | 703 |
| s29 | 145 | 37.6 | 1956 | 1466 | 977 |
| s30 | 145 | 34.7 | 2084 | 1568 | 1053 |
| Average | 38.0 | 1651.7 | 1257.7 | 864.0 | |
| SD | 3.8 | 236.7 | 177.7 | 152.4 | |
| No. | Position | ADA (%) | MIA (%) | MDA (%) |
| 245 | N | 23.10 | 2.34 | 77.20 |
| W | 17.22 | 2.10 | 62.24 | |
| E | 17.97 | 0.02 | 64.26 | |
| S | 21.75 | 2.18 | 69.90 | |
| 254 | N | 32.97 | 11.54 | 53.47 |
| W | 33.42 | 16.85 | 53.09 | |
| E | 30.00 | 9.03 | 55.55 | |
| S | 37.82 | 10.87 | 63.30 | |
| 275 | N | 30.68 | 3.93 | 56.16 |
| W | 30.41 | 1.80 | 60.63 | |
| E | 27.11 | 7.87 | 53.65 | |
| S | 27.55 | 3.70 | 51.48 | |
| 287 | N | 18.65 | 2.69 | 33.05 |
| W | 22.94 | 1.47 | 53.91 | |
| E | 16.74 | 3.31 | 30.88 | |
| S | 27.36 | 3.06 | 54.39 | |
| 345 | N | 31.25 | 4.91 | 78.89 |
| W | 25.84 | 3.87 | 80.26 | |
| E | 22.47 | 3.87 | 47.79 | |
| S | 22.74 | 4.91 | 43.66 | |
| Average | 25.90 | 5.02 | 57.19 | |
| SD | 5.96 | 4.17 | 13.25 |
| No. | Position | ADA (%) | MIA (%) | MDA (%) |
| 27 | N | 27.38 | 5.90 | 52.81 |
| W | 26.60 | 4.73 | 61.00 | |
| E | 26.99 | 7.42 | 54.38 | |
| S | 33.68 | 7.10 | 72.19 | |
| Average | 28.66 | 6.29 | 60.10 | |
| SD | 3.36 | 1.23 | 8.81 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).