Submitted:
20 February 2025
Posted:
21 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Acquisition
2.2. Simulation Approach: PENELOPE-PENEASY
2.2.1. Phase Space


2.2.2. Spectrum processing and detection system modeling
2.3. Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Absorbed Dose: An Approach for Optimizing XRF Detection
3. Results
3.1. Absorbed Dose Distribution
3.2. Signal-to-Noise with XFCT
3.3. Dose-Weighted SNR for XFCT
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- R. Weissleder and M. Nahrendorf, “Advancing biomedical imaging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 47. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp. 14424–14428, 23-Nov-2015.
- J. Rong and Y. Liu, “Advances in medical imaging techniques,” BMC Methods, vol. 1, no. 1. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 01-Aug-2024.
- L.A. Feldkamp, undefined., et al. "Practical cone-beam algorithm," in Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision, 1984.
- Flannery BP, Deckman HW, Roberg WG, D'Amico K. 2. 1987. Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Science 237:1439–44.
- Adrian Sheppard, Shane Latham, Jill Middleton, Andrew Kingston, Glenn Myers, Trond Varslot, Andrew Fogden, Tim Sawkins, Ron Cruikshank, Mohammad Saadatfar, Nicolas Francois, Christoph Arns, Tim Senden, Techniques in helical scanning, dynamic imaging and image segmentation for improved quantitative analysis with X-ray micro-CT, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Volume 324, 2014, Pages 49-56, ISSN 0168-583X. [CrossRef]
- Till Dreier, Niccolò Peruzzi, Ulf Lundström, and Martin Bech, "Improved resolution in x-ray tomography by super-resolution," Appl. Opt. 60, 5783-5794 (2021).
- Valente, M. , Mattea, F., Martín, G., Moyano, T., & Pérez, P. (2021). Adaptation of a microCT facility for automatic recognition of bioceramic-based sealers in molar root canals aimed at endodontic treatment quality control. In X-Ray Spectrometry (Vol. 51, Issue 3, pp. 241–250). Wiley. [CrossRef]
- R. Cesáreo, et al. "A new tomographic device based on the detection of fluorescent x-rays," in Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1989.
- J. F. Dorsey et al., “Gold nanoparticles in radiation research: potential applications for imaging and radiosensitization,” Transl. Cancer Res. 2 (4), 280 –291, 2013. [CrossRef]
- Cheong, S.-K. , Jones, B. L., K Siddiqi, A., Liu, F., Manohar, N., & Cho, S. H. (2010). X-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT) imaging of gold nanoparticle-loaded objects using 110 kVp x-rays. In Physics in Medicine and Biology (Vol. 55, Issue 3, pp. 647–662). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Martín, N. E. , Haro, M. S., & Valente, N. (2024). Processing of the Signal Obtained from X-Ray Fluorescence Emissions to Estimate Localization in Biomedical Applications. In 2024 Argentine Conference on Electronics (CAE). 2024 Argentine Conference on Electronics (CAE). IEEE. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K. , Fachet, M., Al-Maatoq, M., Chakraborty, A., Khismatrao, R. S., Oka, S. V., Staufer, T., Grüner, F., Michel, T., Walles, H., & Hoeschen, C. (2023). Characterization of a polychromatic microfocus X-ray fluorescence imaging setup with metallic contrast agents in a microphysiological tumor model. In Frontiers in Physics (Vol. 11). Frontiers Media SA. [CrossRef]
- Aime Guarda, Mauro Valente, Rodolfo Figueroa, Development and characterisation of a confocal detection array for K-lines of heavy metals in big light matrix, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Volume 179, 2021, 109116, ISSN 0969-806X. [CrossRef]
- N. Manohar, F. J. Reynoso, y S. H. Cho, “Technical note: A benchtop cone-beam X-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT) system with a high-power X-ray source and transmission CT imaging capability”, Med. Phys., vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 4652–4659, Oct. 2018.
- H. DeBrosse et al., “Comparing X-ray fluorescence emission tomography and computed tomography: contrast-to-noise ratios in a numerical mouse phantom”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 12930, 1293011, 2024.
- H. DeBrosse et al., “Joint estimation of metal density and attenuation maps with pencil beam XFET,” IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 7(2), 191–202 (2023).
- L. Li et al., “Full-field in vivo imaging of nanoparticles using benchtop cone-beam XFCT system with pixelated photon counting detector,” Phys. Med. Biol. 68(3), 035020 (2023).
- S. Zhang et al., “Quantitative imaging of Gd nanoparticles in mice using benchtop cone-beam X-ray fluorescence computed tomography system,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(9), 2315 (2019).
- S.-K. Cheong, B. L. Jones, A. K. Siddiqi, F. Liu, N. Manohar, y S. H. Cho, “X-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT) imaging of gold nanoparticle-loaded objects using 110 kVp X-rays”, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 647–662, Feb. 2010.
- H. A. DeBrosse, G. Jadick, L. J. Meng, and P. J. La Riviere, “Comparing x-ray fluorescence emission tomography and computed tomography: contrast-to-noise ratios in a numerical mouse phantom,” Medical Imaging 2024: Clinical and Biomedical Imaging. SPIE, p. 35, 02-Apr-2024.
- T. Yuasa et al., “Reconstruction method for fluorescent X-ray computed tomography by least-squares method using singular value decomposition”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Feb. 1997.
- M. Ahmad, M. Bazalova-Carter, R. Fahrig, y L. Xing, “Optimized detector angular configuration increases the sensitivity of X-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT)”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1140–1147, May 2015.
- H. DeBrosse, G. Jadick, L. J. Meng, and P. La Rivière, “Contrast-to-noise ratio comparison between X-ray fluorescence emission tomography and computed tomography,” Journal of Medical Imaging, vol. 11, no. S1. SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng, 15-Oct-2024.
- S. Mandot, E. M. Zannoni, L. Cai, X. Nie, P. J. L. Rivière, M. D. Wilson, and L. J. Meng, “A High-Sensitivity Benchtop X-Ray Fluorescence Emission Tomography (XFET) System With a Full-Ring of X-Ray Imaging-Spectrometers and a Compound-Eye Collimation Aperture,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 43, no. 5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 1782–1791, May-2024.
- Reynaert, N. , et al. (2007). "Monte Carlo Treatment Planning for Photon and Electron Beams." Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52(21), R287-R301.
- Metropolis, Nicholas, and S. Ulam. “The Monte Carlo Method.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 44, no. 247, 1949, pp. 335–41. JSTOR. [CrossRef]
- Carter, L L, and Cashwell, E D. Particle-transport simulation with the Monte Carlo method. United States: N. p., 1975. Web. [CrossRef]
- David Sarrut, Nicolas Arbor., et al. "The OpenGATE ecosystem for Monte Carlo simulation in medical physics," in Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 67, no. 18, pp. 184001, 2022.
- Vasileios Eleftheriadis, Georgios Savvidis., et al. "A framework for prediction of personalized pediatric nuclear medical dosimetry based on machine learning and Monte Carlo techniques," in Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 084004, 2023.
- Malano F, Mattea F, Geser FA, Pérez P, Barraco D, Santibáñez M, Figueroa R, Valente M. Assessment of FLUKA, PENELOPE and MCNP6 Monte Carlo codes for estimating gold fluorescence applied to the detection of gold-infused tumoral volumes. Appl Radiat Isot. 2019 Sep;151:280-288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NEA (2019), PENELOPE 2018: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport: Workshop Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain, 28 January – 1 February 2019, OECD Publishing, Paris. [CrossRef]
- Mergen Knoll, I. , Quevedo, A., & Salomón Alva Sánchez, M. (2022). Applications of Simulation Codes Based on Monte Carlo Method for Radiotherapy. IntechOpen. [CrossRef]
- Asai Makoto, Cortés-Giraldo Miguel A., Giménez-Alventosa Vicent, Giménez Gómez Vicent, Salvat Francesc. The PENELOPE Physics Models and Transport Mechanics. Implementation into Geant4. Frontiers in Physics. Volume 9, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Giménez-Alventosa, V. , Giménez Gómez, V., & Oliver, S. (2021). PenRed: An extensible and parallel Monte-Carlo framework for radiation transport based on PENELOPE. Computer Physics Communications, 267, 108065.
- Sterpin E, Salvat F, Cravens R, Ruchala K, Olivera GH, Vynckier S. Monte Carlo simulation of helical tomotherapy with PENELOPE. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Apr 21;53(8):2161-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez, P et al. Non-Destructive Structural Testing Using X-Ray Microtomography for Estimation of Mass Density Differences in Rabbit Bone Specimens. Int. J. Morphol. [online]. 2016, vol.34, n.4 [citado 2024-12-13], pp.1232-1238. ISSN 0717-9502. [CrossRef]
- Gilli, R; Mattera, F, Martin, G and Valente, M. X-ray microtomography to characterize the volume of the extracted root canal in endodontic instrumentation.. An. AFA [online]. 2022, vol.33, n.3 pp.70-76. ISSN 0327-358X. [CrossRef]
- McCormick M, Liu X, Jomier J, Marion C, Ibanez L. ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8:13. Published 2014 Feb 20. [CrossRef]
- J. Sempau, A. Badal, & L. Brualla (2011). A PENELOPE-based system for the automated Monte Carlosimulation of clinacs and voxelized geometries–-application to far-from-axis fields. Med. Phys., 38, 5887 - 5895.
- J. Sempau, E. Acosta, J. Bar´o, & J.M. Fern´andez-Vareaand F. Salvat (1997). An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 132.
- J. Bar´o, J. Sempau, J. M. Fernandez-Varea, & F. Salvat (1995). PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 100.
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (n.d.). X-ray Data Booklet: Section 1 - X-ray Elements. Retrieved from https://xdb.lbl.gov/Section1/Periodic_Table/X-ray_Elements.html.
- RH Redus, JA Pantazis, TJ Pantazis, AC Huber y BJ Cross, “Caracterización de detectores de CdTe para espectroscopia cuantitativa de rayos X”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 56, n.º 4, págs. 2524-2532, agosto de 2009.
- Amptek, User Operating Manual XR-100CdTe X-Ray Detector Preamplifier. United States 2017.
- Aime Guarda, Mauro Valente, Rodolfo Figueroa, Development and characterisation of a confocal detection array for K-lines of heavy metals in big light matrix, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Volume 179, 2021, 109116, ISSN 0969-806X. [CrossRef]
- Figueroa, Rodolfo & Valente, Mauro & Guarda, Jaime & Leiva, Jorge & Quilaguilque, Eduardo & Casanelli, Bryan & Leyton, Fernando. (2021). OXIRIS project: Development of a new XRF device for the simultaneous detection and treatment of cancer. X-Ray Spectrometry. 51. 10.1002/xrs.3272.
- M. Valente et al., "Development and characterization of a microCT facility," in IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3967-3973, Sept. 2016. [CrossRef]
- da Silva, J. Improved compact representation method for Monte Carlo phase spaces. Phys Med. 2023 Sep;113:102667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoodian, N.; Rezapourian, M.; Inamdar, A.A.; Kumar, K.; Fachet, M.; Hoeschen, C. Enabling Low-Dose In Vivo Benchtop X-ray Fluorescence Computed Tomography through Deep-Learning-Based Denoising. J. Imaging 2024, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Gold concentration [% w/w] | ] | <I> [eV] |
|---|---|---|
| 2% | 1.01933 | 71.631 |
| 1% | 1.00957 | 70.024 |
| 0.8% | 1.00764 | 70.122 |
| 0.5% | 1.00470 | 69.632 |
| 0.2% | 1.00199 | 69.383 |
| 0.1% | 1.00095 | 69.151 |
| 0.05% | 1.00045 | 69.207 |
| K-Lines | Energy [keV] | Probability Emission |
|---|---|---|
| 66,9895 | 0.288 | |
| 68,8037 | 0.493 | |
| 77,984 | 0.11 | |
| 80,082 | 0.046 |
| Tissue | FWHM [keV] |
|---|---|
| Kα2 | 0.719 ± 0.025 |
| Kα1 | 0.688 ± 0.012 |
| Kβ1 | 0.774 ± 0.016 |
| Kβ2 | 0.777 ± 0.288 |
| Gold Concentration [% wt] | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.05 |
|
Mean dose [eV/g] |
17.78 | 10.54 | 9.10 | 6.96 | 4.83 | 4.12 | 3.77 |
|
Dose uncertainty [eV/g] |
0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Gold Concentration [% w/w.] | Dose [eV/g.prim] | SNR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 17.78 | 42.41 | 57.79 | 17.11 | 5.22 |
| 1 | 10.54 | 25.24 | 34.10 | 8.98 | 2.54 |
| 0.8 | 9.10 | 21.15 | 28.42 | 7.17 | 1.96 |
| 0.5 | 6.96 | 14.50 | 18.86 | 4.53 | 1.21 |
| 0.2 | 4.83 | 6.73 | 7.68 | 1.72 | 0.54 |
| 0.1 | 4.12 | 3.98 | 3.69 | 0.73 | 0.031 |
| 0.05 | 3.77 | 2.65 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.008 |
| Gold fluorescence emission lines | Optimal concentration %w/w | Fit parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | ||||
| 0.50 | 4.78 | 1.76 | 0.29 | |
| 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.24 | 0.07 | |
| 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
| - | 0.27 | 0.66 | 0.48 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).