Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Tooth Wear Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors Among a Small Portuguese Community: A Retrospective Study

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

07 February 2025

Posted:

10 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Abstract: Background/Objectives: This study aims to study the prevalence of tooth wear (TW) in a sample of patients seeking the Screening and Urgency appointment at Egas Moniz Dental Clinic (EMDC) and correlate TW with risk factors. Methods: The database created with the collected information was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Data from 2266 patients, collected between 2021 and 2023, was analyzed for the presence of tooth wear, its different types and its correlation with risk factors. Results: The prevalence of dental wear was found to be 54.7%, with attrition (24.1%) being the most prevalent lesion, and erosion (2.7%) the least prevalent. Concerning risk predictors for tooth wear, age, decreased DVO, antacids, mastigation difficulties, drugs and use of mouthwash were positively associated. Conclusions: It was concluded that TW is prev-alent and increases with age, underscoring the necessity for timely and accurate diagnosis to minimise its progression. Additionally, it is crucial to conduct a thorough evaluation of the risk factors involved, to implement effective preventive measures and treatment strategies.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Tooth wear (TW) is a multifactorial condition described as the progressive loss of dental hard tissues [1,2]. Due to its multifactorial aetiology, TW can manifest in many ways and can be difficult to diagnose and to manage [2]. It occurs mainly through three specific processes: abrasion, attrition, and erosion. A fourth wear-related process, abfraction, was postulated to potentiate wear by abrasion and/or erosion, although this term has been recently discouraged as the level of evidence regarding this was considered to be week by the current evidence to justify it as a separate process [1,3], also the term “non-carious cervical lesion” (NCCL) is a more appropriate designation to describe abrasion lesions [4].
It is important to prevent or reduce the destruction of tooth wear by the early identification of TW lesions, grade its severity, diagnose the likely cause or causes and monitoring this condition [5]. The most recent consensus statement on the management of severe tooth wear states that priority should be given to early detection of (severe) tooth wear and to identify the underlying etiology [6,7].
Global prevalence of tooth wear was evaluated in recent multi-centered studies throughout Europe, Arabia and China reporting a range from 29% to 60% [8,9,10]. The variation in data reflects different methods used to quantify TW and difference in ages [11]. Also, TW is becoming a relevant oral health issue among young adults, as cross-sectional studies revealed that it occurs at a young age [12,13]. To date in the Portuguese community, very few data provided a comprehensive assessment on TW prevalence. Addressing risk factors, only two studies were found regarding dental erosion in patients with alcoholic habits and vomiting behavior (anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa) [14,15].
This study aims at investigating the prevalence and related risk factors concerning TW in a population attending a Portuguese university dental clinic and contribute to the development of effective strategies for its management and prevention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Eligibility Criteria and Sampling

This observational Cross-Sectional study was conducted at Egas Moniz Dental Clinic (EMDC), at Egas Moniz School of Health and Science University (Almada, Portugal), from April 2021 to November 2023, and approved by the Egas Moniz Ethics Committee (1349/2021). Patients seeking treatment at the Screening and emergency appointment at EMDC, were invited to voluntarily and anonymously participate in the study. To be included, patients had to be able to understand and sign the informed consent form, be 18 years of age or older and have a complete filled tooth wear index at the appointment.

2.2. Data Collection

Patients were positioned in a dental chair under the examination light source, and the observations took place using a dental mirror, air syringe and cotton rolls. The data was collected through a Screening form, filled with the patient’s information, medication, oral hygiene habits, alcohol and drugs use, diet and clinical observations, and was conducted by 4th and 5th year dental students, who were supervised by experienced dentists.

2.3. Variables

The presence or absence of erosion, attrition and NCCL and the combinations of different wear types (erosion and/or attrition and/or NCCL) were the clinical outcome variables. Predictor variables were Age, Gender, Bronchodilators, Antacids, Mastication difficulties, Dry mouth, Consumption of alcohol, Drugs use, Consumption of beverages, Consumption of fresh fruits, Tooth brushing frequency, Mouthwash and Esthetic complaints.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics methodologies were applied.
Further, logistic regression analysis was used to model the relationship between TW and several risk indicators. Multivariate models were constructed for each of the outcome clinical variables (abrasion, attrition, erosion and presence of non-carious cervical lesions), via a stepwise procedure. Only predictor variables showing a significance p ≤ 0.05 in the univariate model were included in the multivariate logistic regression procedure. The contribution of each variable to the model was evaluated by Wald statistics. Interactions were also analyzed for all tested variables. A final reduced model for each of the considered clinical outcome was obtained, based on the significant predictor variable categories. Odds Ratio (OR) along with correspondent 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) were calculated for both univariate (crude OR) and multivariate analyses (adjusted OR). The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.

3. Results

3.1. Patients Characteritics

The research sample consisted of 2266 patients who attended the Screening and Emergency appointment at EMDC and were considered eligible for inclusion in this study (Table 3). 936 patients were males with a mean age of 42.85 years (± 19.7 years) and 1330 were females with a mean age of 42.52 (± 19.6 years).

3.2. Tooth Wear Prevelance

Regarding the different forms of TW, males presented a higher prevalence of TW (58,3%) in both individual and combined lesions (Table 1). Attrition (26% and 22,85% in male and female gender, respectively) was considered the most prevalent TW lesion (Table 1). The least prevalent was Erosion (2,6% and 2,85% for male and female gender, respectively). In the combined lesions, the most common was Attrition and NCCL (12,3% and 9% for males and females, respectively), with Erosion + NCCL being the least common for males (1,6%) and Erosion + Attrition + NCCL for the females (0,8%). In both genders, 1026 patients did not present any type of tooth wear (45,3%).

3.3. Risk Factors

The most common risk factor was the use of mouthwash (39,2% in both males and females) (Table 2). Decreased DVO (22,2% in males and 22,9% in females) and mastication difficulties (16,6% in males and 21,3% in females) also showed high levels of commonness in the population studied.
The risk factors least encountered were the consumption of sodas (0,3% in males and 0,1% in females), Sjögren’s Syndrome (0,1% in males and 0,5% in females) and the intake of antacids (1% in males and 0,9% in females).
All factors measured were tested for association with the prevalence of different types of TW using multivariate analysis, and only those found to be significant are presented in Table 3.

4. Discussion

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of TW among individuals attending the Screening and Emergency consultation at EMDC. Overall, the prevalence of TW was 54,7%, with attrition (24,1%) being the most prevalent, similar to results seen in studies such as Al-Ani [16], Hedge et al. [17] and Hemmings et al [18], followed by NCCL (11,6%) and Erosion (2,7%) considering individual lesions.
Dental hard tissues loss, resulting in TW, is a matter of growing significance; this is particularly true as people live longer and are able to maintain their natural teeth into old age [8,19,20]. TW can be caused by a range of factors, including chemical, biological, behavioral, medications, gastrointestinal problems, and acid regurgitation [8,19].
Documenting a comprehensive history for the primary complaint, finding the etiology is important in order to manage the associated risk factors, preventing further structure loss and allowing monitoring of the associated symptoms [21]. Of the risk factors documented, mouthwash (42.1%) was a popular element included in the patient's oral hygiene habits. Nonetheless, its abuse can cause dental erosion, one of the most reported side effects, not only because of the pH, but also due to its viscosity [22]. Factors such as decreased VDO (22.6%), mastication difficulties (19.3%) and frequent dry mouth (11.7%) also displayed moderate prevalence percentages. Additional to the primary objective, we aimed to explore any potential associations between TW and various risk factors.
Concerning risk predictors in individual TW lesions, none were positively associated with erosion. Age was common for attrition and NCCL (OR = 1.01 equally). For the association erosion + attrition + NCCL, age (OR = 1.05) and decreased DVO (OR = 2.16) were significantly associated. For erosion + attrition, age (OR = 1.03), antacids (OR = 7.07) and mastigation difficulties (OR = 1.87) were significant. Considering erosion + NCCL only age (OR = 1.03) was positively established. Regarding attrition + NCCL, age (OR = 1.05), narcotics (OR = 2.38), mouthwash (OR = 1.47) and female gender (OR = 0.7) were associated.
In accordance with this investigation, age has demonstrated itself to be a common significant result when associated with TW, seen in works such as Shrestha & Rajbhandari [23], Sun et al. [24], Van 't Spijker et al. [9], Wei et al. [25]. Considering gender, Wei et al. [25] and Zhang et al. [26] concluded that there was no distinction in prevalence between gender. Nevertheless, our results indicate a higher prevalence of TW in male gender (58.2%). Despite this, our multivariable analyses did not reveal a positive association between TW and gender, only when considering the association of Attrition and NCCL, where female gender revealed a lower risk (OR = 0.7). Also, our study observed no correlation between tooth wear and how often individuals brush their teeth, which is consistent with the findings of Sadaf et al. [27], and Bartlett et al. [28]. On the other hand, research by Wei et al. [25] demonstrated a significant correlation between these variables.
Among patients who frequently consume acidic foods and soft drinks, this investigation found no increase in TW similar to the findings in studies conducted on Chinese adults [25]. In contrast, research conducted in China, Poland, and Europe demonstrated a significant association between frequent consumption of these items and increased TW [25,28,29].
Concerning the interaction of Attrition + NCCL with drug use there were substantial findings. This might be explained by the presence of bruxism as a result of drug-induced hyperactivity [30,31]. According to Donaldson & Goodchild [30]; Shetty et al., [31], erosion is also common in cases of substance abuse, however, this doesn’t go in line with our results.
Intrinsic acid from conditions such as GERD, anorexia, and bulimia can also lead to erosive TW, as demonstrated by other studies [24,25,28,29]; this was not supported by the results found in the present study. Interestingly, the intake of antacids (OR = 7.07) was proven significant when correlated with the combined lesion of Erosion and Attrition, which leads us to think that some patients may exhibit signs of erosion due to other pathologies treated with such medication, rather than GERD, or that GERD was not correctly diagnosed.
In this study, the frequent sensation of dry mouth was not significantly linked to tooth wear caused by erosion. This finding differs from the results of Sun et al. [24] and Zwier et al. [32], who found that low salivary flow is a major risk factor for tooth wear. Both studies highlighted the vital role of saliva in maintaining oral health, particularly in protecting teeth from erosion by neutralizing acids and supporting enamel repair [24,32]. The lack of correlation between the sensation of dry mouth and TW found in the present study, might reflect the subjectivity of this risk factor, emphasizing the need for effectively measuring saliva parameters.
This research is a retrospective study, which comes with certain limitations. For instance, there may be incomplete information about exposure to causal agents. Additionally, since the data was collected through screening questions administered by students rather than trained and calibrated researchers, there is a higher potential for errors. Another challenge is the difficulty in differentiating between erosion, attrition, and abrasion, as these conditions frequently coexist and overlap, making clear distinctions hard to establish.
Nevertheless, given the lack of clinical studies on TW and associated risk factors in large populations, this study might give some insight on the planning of more controlled clinical trials on this topic and contribute to the development of prevention and monitoring strategies.

5. Conclusions

The prevalence of TW reported in this study was 54.7%, being attrition the most common lesion (24.1%) and erosion the least (2.7%).
Several risk factors were associated with TW, in both individually or combined lesions, with age present in several as a statistically significant risk factor.
Further studies should be conducted to delve deeper into the reasons behind the findings and to formulate less ambiguous questions for better understanding of patients. This study underscores the need for implementing validated questionnaires and observer calibration.
Additional prospective studies could confirm the consistency of these results.

Author Contributions

R.C., S.R. and A.V. contributed to study conception and design and to the collection and data interpretation. L.P. and A.V. contributed to statistical analysis and data interpretation. R.C., S.R., M.N., E.G., J.R. and A.V. contributed to data interpretation. All authors contributed to the manuscript draft and to critically revise the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Egas Moniz Ethics Committee (1349/2021), Egas Moniz School of Health and Science (Almada, Portugal).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the reported results are confidential and cannot be shared publicly due to privacy and ethical restrictions. However, interested researchers may request access by contacting the corresponding author via email. Access will be granted at the discretion of the authors and in accordance with applicable regulations.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TW Tooth wear
NCCL Non-carious cervical lesion
DVO Dimension of Vertical Occlusion
EMDC Egas Moniz Dental Clinic
GERD Gastroesophageal reflux disease

References

  1. Shellis, R. P.; Addy, M. The Interactions between Attrition, Abrasion and Erosion in Tooth Wear. In Monographs in Oral Science 2014, 25, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wetselaar, P.; Lobbezoo, F. The Tooth Wear Evaluation System: A Modular Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management Planning of Worn Dentitions. J. Oral Rehabil. 2016, 43(1), 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schlueter, N.; Amaechi, B. T.; Bartlett, D.; Buzalaf, M. A. R.; Carvalho, T. S.; Ganss, C.; Hara, A. T.; Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M.; Lussi, A.; Moazzez, R.; Vieira, A. R.; West, N. X.; Wiegand, A.; Young, A.; Lippert, F. Terminology of Erosive Tooth Wear: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by the ORCA and the Cariology Research Group of the IADR. In Caries Res. 2020, 54, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Al-Ani, Z. Tooth Wear: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Mechanical Factors. Dent. Update 2023, 50, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holbrook, W. P.; Árnadóttir, I. B.; Kay, E. J. Prevention. Part 3: Prevention of Tooth Wear. Br. Dent. J. 2003, 195, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Loomans, B.; Opdam, N.; Attin, T.; Bartlett, D.; Edelhoff, D.; Frankenberger, R.; Benic, G.; Ramseyer, S.; Wetselaar, P.; Sterenborg, B.; Hickel, R.; Pallesen, U.; Mehta, S.; Banerji, S.; Lussi, A.; Wilson, N. Severe Tooth Wear: European Consensus Statement on Management Guidelines. J. Adhes. Dent. 2017, 19, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wetselaar, P.; Wetselaar-Glas, M. J. M.; Katzer, L. D.; Ahlers, M. O. Diagnosing Tooth Wear, a New Taxonomy Based on the Revised Version of the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES 2.0). J. Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Awad, M. A.; El Kassas, D.; Al Harthi, L.; Abraham, S. B.; Al-Khalifa, K. S.; Khalaf, M. E.; Al Habashneh, R.; Bartlett, D. Prevalence, Severity and Explanatory Factors of Tooth Wear in Arab Populations. J. Dent. 2019, 80, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van’t Spijker, A.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Kreulen, C. M.; Bronkhorst, E. M.; Bartlett, D. W.; Creugers, N. H. J. Prevalence of Tooth Wear in Adults. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2009, 22(1), 35–42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. 1926. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Witter, D. J.; Bronkhorst, E. M.; Bartlett, D. W.; Creugers, N. H. J. Occlusal Tooth Wear in Chinese Adults with Shortened Dental Arches. J. Oral Rehabil. 2014, 41, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bartlett, D.; O’Toole, S. Tooth Wear: Best Evidence Consensus Statement. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 30, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kreulen, C. M.; Van’T Spijker, A.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Bronkhorst, E. M.; Creugers, N. H. J.; Bartlett, D. W. Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Tooth Wear in Children and Adolescents. Caries Res. 2010, 44, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salas, M. M. S.; Nascimento, G. G.; Huysmans, M. C.; Demarco, F. F. Estimated Prevalence of Erosive Tooth Wear in Permanent Teeth of Children and Adolescents: An Epidemiological Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lourenço, M.; Azevedo, Á.; Brandão, I.; Gomes, P. S. Orofacial Manifestations in Outpatients with Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Focusing on the Vomiting Behavior. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018, 22, 1915–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Manarte, P.; Conceição Manso, M.; Souza, D.; Frias-Bulhosa, J.; Gago, S. Analytic Cross-Sectional Study on Dental Erosion Experience. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2009, 14, 376–383. [Google Scholar]
  16. Al-Ani, B.Z.N. The prevalence and associated factors of tooth wear amongst adults seeking treatment in the faculty of dentistry, University of Malaya; University of Malaya, 2019.
  17. Hegde, M.; Yelapure, M.; Honap, M.; Devadiga, D. The prevalence of tooth wear and its associated risk factors in Indian South West coastal population: An epidemiological study. J. Int. Clin. Dent. Res. Organ. 2018, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hemmings, K.; Truman, A.; Shah, S.; Chauhan, R. Tooth wear guidelines for the bsrd part 1: aetiology, diagnosis and prevention. Dent. Update 2018, 45, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Atalay, C.; Ozgunaltay, G. Evaluation of tooth wear and associated risk factors: A matched case–Control study. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2018, 21, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nadiger, R. Tooth Wear, Etiology, Diagnosis and Its Management in Elderly: A Literature Review. Int. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2012, 2, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kontaxopoulou, I.; Alam, S. Risk Assessment for Tooth Wear. Prim. Dent. J. 2015, 4, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Radzki, D.; Wilhelm-Węglarz, M.; Pruska, K.; Kusiak, A.; Ordyniec-Kwaśnica, I. A Fresh Look at Mouthwashes—What Is Inside and What Is It For? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shrestha, D.; Rajbhandari, P. Prevalence and Its Associated Risk Factors in Tooth Wear. J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 2018, 56, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, K.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Si, Y.; Zheng, S. Tooth wear: A cross-sectional investigation of the prevalence and risk factors in Beijing, China. BDJ Open 2017, 3, 16012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, Z.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tai, B.; Du, M.; Jiang, H. Prevalence and Indicators of Tooth Wear among Chinese Adults. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0162181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, J.; Du, Y.; Wei, Z.; Tai, B.; Jiang, H.; Du, M. The prevalence and risk indicators of tooth wear in 12- and 15-year-old adolescents in Central China. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sadaf, D.; Ahmad, Z. Role of Brushing and Occlusal Forces in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCL). Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2014, 10, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Bartlett, D.W.; Lussi, A.; West, N.X.; Bouchard, P.; Sanz, M.; Bourgeois, D. Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults. J. Dent. 2013, 41, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Strużycka, I.; Lussi, A.; Bogusławska-Kapała, A.; Rusyan, E. Prevalence of erosive lesions with respect to risk factors in a young adult population in Poland—A cross-sectional study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 2197–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Donaldson, M.; Goodchild, J.H. Oral health of the methamphetamine abuser. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shetty, V.; Mooney, L.J.; Zigler, C.M.; Belin, T.R.; Murphy, D.; Rawson, R. The Relationship Between Methamphetamine Use and Increased Dental Disease. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2010, 141, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zwier, N.; Huysmans, M.C.D.N.J.M.; Jager, D.H.J.; Ruben, J.; Bronkhorst, E.M.; Truin, G.J. Saliva Parameters and Erosive Wear in Adolescents. Caries Res. 2013, 47, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Prevalence of the different types of Tooth Wear: Erosion, Attrition and NCCL (Noncarious cervical lesions) and combinations.
Table 1. Prevalence of the different types of Tooth Wear: Erosion, Attrition and NCCL (Noncarious cervical lesions) and combinations.
Tooth Wear Erosion Attrition NCCL Erosion + Attrition + NCCL Erosion + Attrition Erosion + NCCL Attrition + NCCL No Wear Total
Male
n (%)
24 (2.6) 243 (26) 103 (11) 21 (2.2) 24 (2.6) 15 (1.6) 115 (12.3) 391 (41.7) 936 (100)
Female n (%) 38 (2.85) 304 (22.85) 159 (12) 21 (1.6) 28 (2.1) 25 (1.9) 120 (9) 635 (47.7) 1330 (100)
Table 2. Prevalence of the different risk factors evaluated.
Table 2. Prevalence of the different risk factors evaluated.
Risk Factors Male n (%) Female n (%)
Sjögren’s Syndrome 1 (0,1) 6 (0,5)
Bronchodilator 16 (1,7). 22 (1,7)
Antacids 9 (1). 12 (0,9)
Alcohol intake 140 (15) 57 (4,3)
Narcotics 50 (5,3) 18 (1,4)
Fruits (2-3 times a day) 9 (1) 29 (2,2)
Soda (2-3 times a day) 3 (0,3) 1 (0,1)
Brushing (+3 times a day) 37 (4) 61 (4,6)
Mouthwash 367 (39,2) 586 (39,2)
Listerine 222 (23,7) 303 (22,8)
Mastigation difficulties 155 (16,6) 283 (21,3)
Ashamed to smile 95 (10,1) 231 (17,4)
Frequent dry mouth 89 (9,5) 176 (13,2)
Decreased DVO 208 (22,2) 304 (22,9)
* DVO – Dimension of Vertical Occlusion.
Table 3. Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with TW types.
Table 3. Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with TW types.
Type of lesion Associated risk factor(s)
Erosion No risk factor was positively associated
Attrition Age (OR=1.01)
NCCL Age (OR=1.01)
Erosion + Attrition + NCCL Age (OR=1.05); Decreased DVO (OR=2.16)
Erosion + Attrition Age (OR= 1.03); Antacids (OR= 7.07); Mastigation difficulties (OR= 1.87)
Erosion + NCCL Age (OR= 1.03)
Attrition + NCCL Age (OR= 1.05); Drugs (OR= 2.38); Mouthwash (OR= 1.47); Female gender (OR= 0.70)
* NCCL – Non-carious cervical lesion; DVO – Dimension of Vertical Occlusion.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated