Submitted:
07 February 2025
Posted:
08 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bibliometric Analysis
- Research Question Formulation: The bibliometric analysis was framed around the question: "How does vessel dwell time affect port efficiency?" This allowed to guide the selection of relevant publications and keywords.
- Data Collection and Keyword Extraction: The search terms “Port Efficiency”, “Port Operations”, and “Ship Time”, were entered into the Web of Science (WoS) database, resulting in the identification of relevant publications. This query yielded a corpus of research publications central to the topic.
- Keyword Co-Occurrence Analysis: The VOSviewer 1.6.20 software was utilized to analyse keyword co-occurrence, thereby creating a network of terms that frequently appear together. This co-occurrence analysis reveals thematic clusters within the research, highlighting key areas such as port efficiency, emissions, and just-intime arrival.
- Data Organization: The publications that met the inclusion criteria were organized with EndNote software, allowing for systematic tracking of sources.
2.2. Data Collection, Pre-processing, and Statistical Analysis of Vessel Dwell Time
- Data Quality Check: The raw data were examined to remove duplicate records, address missing values, and rectify inconsistencies in timestamps.
- Categorization of Movements: Vessel movements were categorized into specific stages, including entry in port jurisdiction, anchoring, berthing, and exit from the port jurisdiction. This categorization enabled a clear understanding of each manoeuvres duration within the port.
- Data Curating: Movement records were curated to filter out incomplete records and ensure that only verified data points were included in the analysis.
- Mean Dwell Time Calculation: For each terminal (Liquid Bulk, Petrochemical, Multipurpose, Liquified Natural Gas, and Containers), the average dwell time was calculated based on vessel turnaround data, allowing for a terminal specific comparison of time efficiency.
- Manoeuvre Duration Analysis: Each manoeuvre was analysed to determine its average duration. Furthermore, the data was examined to identify changes in operations from 2010 to 2023.
- Anchoring Analysis: Given the established correlation between anchoring and dwell time, a focused analysis was conducted on anchorage patterns, particularly at the Liquid Bulk Terminal, where the majority of anchoring events occurred.
- Outliers Analysis: The outliers for each terminal were analyzed to assess both their quantitative impact on the results and their overall frequency.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Bibliometric Analysis Results
3.2. Statistical Analysis of Vessel Dwell Time Results
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rodrigue, J.P.; Notteboom, T. Maritime Shipping and International Trade. In Port Economics, Management and Policy; Rodrigue, J.P., Notteboom, T., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Chapter 1.1. Available online: https://porteconomicsmanagement.org/pemp/contents/part1/maritime-shipping-and-international-trade/ (accessed on 28 May 2024).
- Gonzalez, O.; Koivisto, H.; Mustonen, J.; Keinänen-Toivola, M. Digitalization in just-in-time approach as a sustainable solution for maritime logistics in the Baltic Sea Region. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1173. [CrossRef]
- Shao, T.; Wu, D.; Ye, Y.; Li, H.; Dong, G.; Liu, G.; Zheng, P. A Novel Virtual Arrival Optimization Method for Traffic Organization Scenarios. Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 403. [CrossRef]
- Pallis, A.; Rodrigue, J. P. Port Efficiency. In Port Economics, Management and Policy, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, England, 2022; pp 424-437.
- Son, J.; Kim, D.-H.; Yun, S.-W.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, S. The Development of Regional Vessel Traffic Congestion Forecasts Using Hybrid Data from an Automatic Identification System and a Port Management Information System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1956. [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Eom, G. Ship Carbon Intensity Indicator Assessment via Just-in-Time Arrival Algorithm Based on Real-Time Data: Case Study of Pusan New International Port. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13875. [CrossRef]
- Neagoe, M.; Hvolby, H.-H.; Turner, P. Why are we still queuing? Exploring landside congestion factors in Australian bulk cargo port terminals. Marit. Transp. Res. 2021, 2, 100036. [CrossRef]
- UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2019. 2020. Available online: https://unctad.org/system/files/official- document/rmt2019ch3_en.pdf (accessed on 28/05/2024.).
- Aroca, J.; Maldonado, J.; Clari, G.; García, N.; Calabria, L.; Lara, J. Enabling a green just-in-time navigation through stakeholder collaboration. Eur. Transp. Res. 2020, 12, 22. [CrossRef]
- GEF-UNDP-IMO GloMEEP Project and the GIA. 2020. Just-in-time Arrival Guide – Barriers and Potential Solutions. Available online: https://portcalloptimization.org/images/JIT%20Guide%20Final.pdf (accessed on 28/03/2024.).
- Merkel, A.; Kalantari, J.; Mubder, A. Port call optimization and CO2-emissions savings– Estimating feasible potential in tramp shipping. Marit. Transp. Res. 2022, 3, 100054. [CrossRef]
- International Maritime Organization. Just-in-Time Arrival Guide. International Maritime Organization: London, UK, 2019. Available online: https://portcalloptimization.org/images/JIT%20Guide%20Final.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2024).
- Nguyen, S.; Leman, A.; Xiao, Z.; Fu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wei, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, N. Blockchain-Powered Incentive System for JIT Arrival Operations and Decarbonization in Maritime Shipping. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15686. [CrossRef]
- Cullinane, K.; Wang, T. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Improving Container Port Efficiency. Res. Transp. Econ. 2006, 17, 1. [CrossRef]
- Krmac, E., & Mansouri Kaleibar, M. A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology in port efficiency evaluation. Marit. Econ. & Logis., 2023, 25, 3. [CrossRef]
- Gavalas, D. Shipping Firms' Efficiency Evaluation through Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Mod. Econ. 2016, 7, 8. [CrossRef]
- Kammoun, R. The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores. Logist. Sustain. Transp. 2018, 9, 2. [CrossRef]
- Soleymani, A.; Sharifi, S.M.H.; Edalat, P.; Sharifi, S.M.M.; Zadeh, S.K. Linear Modeling of Marine Vessels Fuel Consumption for Ration of Subsidized Fuel. IJMT 2018, 10. [CrossRef]
- Rosa Pires da Cruz, M., Ferreira, J., & Garrido Azevedo, S. Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. Marit. Econ. & Logis., 2013, 15, 4. [CrossRef]
- Tseng, P.-H.; Cullinane, K. Key criteria influencing the choice of Arctic shipping: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model. Marit. Policy Manag. 2018, 45, 4. [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.-H.; Lee, H.-S. Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3821. [CrossRef]
- Feng, M.; Shaw, S.-L.; Peng, G.; Fang, Z. Time efficiency assessment of ship movements in maritime ports: A case study of two ports based on AIS data. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 86, 102741. [CrossRef]
- Alessandrini, A.; Mazzarella, F.; Vespe, M. Estimated Time of Arrival Using Historical Vessel Tracking Data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 20, 1. [CrossRef]
- NEXUS. 2025. NEXUS - Innovation Agenda for the Port, Multimodal and Transport Sector. Available online: https://nexuslab.pt/ (accessed on 28 January 2025).
- Öztürk, O. Bibliometric Review of Resource Dependence Theory Literature: An Overview. Manage. Rev. Q. 2021, 71, 3. [CrossRef]
- UNC Library. 2025. PRISMA: Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses. Available online: https://guides.lib.unc.edu/prisma (accessed on 28 January 2025).
- Hoaglin, D. C.; Iglewicz, B.; Tukey, J. W. Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1986, 81, 396. [CrossRef]
- Koren, O.; Koren, M.; Peretz, O. A Procedure for Anomaly Detection and Analysis. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 117, 105503. [CrossRef]
- Ship Technology Global. 2021. Digitally controlling port arrivals: Timing is everything. Available online: https://ship.nridigital.com/ship_sep21/digital_automated_port_arrivals (accessed on 03 January 2025).









| Glossary – Analysis of ship movement data | |
|---|---|
| PLF – Entry | Vessel's entry into the maritime port's jurisdiction area |
| Anchoring | Anchor the vessel in the anchorage areas. |
| Exit to Hover | Leaving the port area to wait for berth. |
| Entry from Hover | Entry in port area to berth after hovering. |
| Suspension | Weigh anchor to depart in order to berth. |
| Berth | Berth the vessel into the terminal and cargo loading/unloading. |
| Leaving | Departure of the vessel from the terminal. |
| PLF – Exit | Vessel's exit from the port's maritime jurisdiction area. |
| Terminal | Total Number of Port Calls (Total) |
Average number of Port Calls (per year) |
Average Dwell Time (in days) |
Average Anchoring consuming Time (in days) | Maximum Vessel Dwell time (in days) | Average Berth consuming Time (in days) | Percentage of Vessels that Anchor (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid Bulk Terminal | 10 473 | 748 | 0.59 | 0.19 | 11.85 | 0.38 | 60 |
| Petrochemical Terminal | 1 811 | 129 | 0.55 | 0.18 | 16.67 | 0.35 | 46 |
| Multipurpose Terminal | 3 101 | 222 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 349.17 | 0.69 | 20 |
| Liquified Natural Gas Terminal | 649 | 46 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 8.53 | 0.38 | 11 |
| Containers Terminal | 13 533 | 967 | 0.38 | 0.12 | 598.83 | 0.24 | 18 |
| Port Total | 29 567 | 2 112 | 0.55 | 0.18 | 598.83 | 0.35 | 38 |
| Terminal | Maximum Vessel Dwell time without Outliers | Average Dwell Time without Outliers |
Number of Port Calls (Outliers) | Percentage of Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid Bulk Terminal |
2.80 | 0.53 | 628 | 6 |
| Petrochemical Terminal |
3.10 | 0.44 | 163 | 9 |
| Multipurpose Terminal |
6.30 | 0.49 | 801 | 26 |
| Liquified Natural Gas Terminal | 1.42 | 0.53 | 25 | 4 |
| Containers Terminal | 1.61 | 0.28 | 1267 | 9 |
| Port Total | 6.30 | 0.45 | 2884 | 10 |
| Country | Number of Port Calls | Liquid Bulk | Dry Bulk | Containers | Break Bulk | Liquified Natural Gas | Liquified Petroleum Gas | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 180 400 | 0.31 | 0.90 | 0.35 | 1.12 | 0.99 | 0.32 | 0.67 |
| USA | 72 485 | 1.64 | 1.84 | 1.00 | 1.79 | 1.28 | 2.03 | 1.60 |
| Singapore | 60 712 | 0.60 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 2.22 | 1.12 | 0.91 |
| Norway | 49 339 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.75 | 0.54 |
| Turkey | 47 488 | 1.11 | 4.00 | 0.63 | 1.52 | 1.31 | 1.36 | 1.66 |
| Brazil | 27 546 | 1.74 | 2.67 | 0.81 | 2.45 | 2.94 | 1.66 | 2.05 |
| Canada | 27 225 | 1.12 | 0.32 | 1.49 | 0.28 | - | - | 0.80 |
| Sines | 2 042 | 0.59 | 1.08 | 0.38 | 1.08 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Total | 1 884 818 | 0.94 | 2.05 | 0.70 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 1.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
