Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Hubble Sphere Radiation Pressure Law is Consistent With the Cosmological Redshift z = Sqrt( R_H/R_t) − 1

Submitted:

06 February 2025

Posted:

07 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Haug and Wojnow [1] have recently demonstrated that there exists a law for the Hubble sphere very similar to the Ideal Gas Law, which they have called the Hubble Sphere Radiation Pressure Law. In this paper, we will demonstrate that the Haug and Tatum cosmologicalredshift: z = Sqrt( R_H/R_t) − 1 can be derived from their framework.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Haug and Wojnow [1] have demonstrated a law similar to the ideal gass law is consistent with the Hubble sphere in certain subgroups of R H = c t cosmology, their Hubble pressure law is given by:
P c , t V H t = n H t R T t = N H t k b T t
where R is the ideal gas constant, P c , t = 3 H t 2 c 2 8 π G is Hubble radiation pressure. V H t = 4 3 π R H , t 3 = 4 3 π c 3 H t 3 is the Hubble sphere volume. Further, N H , t = E c E c m b , where E c = c 5 2 G H t is the critical Friedmann energy and E c m b , t = k b T t is the energy of the CMB temperature at time t. Also, we follow the R H , t = c t principle, where then H t = 1 t . Further, n H , t = N H , t N A , where N A is Avogadro’s constant.
Further, Haug and Wojnow have demonstrated that in R H , t = c t black hole cosmology, we obtain consistency with the CMB temperature formula: T 0 = T p 8 π 2 l p R H , t , where T p = 1 k b c 5 G = m p c 2 k b is the Planck [2,3] temperature, and l p = G c 3 is the Planck length (see [4,5,6,7] for the CMB temperature formula itself). This CMB temperature formula can predict the CMB temperature at present, something the Λ -CDM model cannot do. This leads to the following relation to the ideal gas constant:
R = m a s s × l e n g t h 2 a m o u n t × t e m p e r a t u r e × t i m e 2 = M c , t × R t 2 n H × T t × t t 2
where M c , t = c 3 2 G H t is the critical mass, R H , t = c H t is the Hubble radius and t H , t = 1 H t is the Hubble time, and n H = M c , t c 2 E c m b = M c , t m c m b , where E c m b = k b T t , this all in a universe where we have R H , t = c t , so we get:
R = M c , t × R H , t 2 n H × T t × t H , t 2 R = c 3 2 G H t × c 2 H t 2 N H N A × T t × 1 H t 2 1 = c 5 2 G H t N H R N A T t 1 = E t E t E c m b , t k b T t 1 = E c m b , t k b T t
Next we take advantage of the observed relation that we have T t = T 0 ( 1 + z ) see [8,9,10]. So replacing T t with T 0 ( 1 + z ) we get:
1 = E c m b , t k b T 0 ( 1 + z ) z = E c m b , t E c m b , 0 1
Further E c m b , 0 = k b T 0 = E p 8 π 2 l p R H , 0 and E c m b , t = k b T t = E p 8 π 2 l p R H , t , where E p = c 5 G is the Planck energy, this leads to:
z = E p 8 π 2 l p R H , t E p 8 π 2 l p R H , 0 1 z = R H R H , t 1
Which is the cosmological redshift first presented by Haug and Tatum [11], which they have demonstrated can be used to match the full distance ladder of SN Ia with a single value of H 0 . In other words, it has been used to resolve the Hubble tension. This paper also demonstrates that their redshift is fully consistent with the Hubble sphere radiation pressure law presented by Haug and Wojnow.

2. Conclusions

We have demonstrated that the Hubble sphere radiation pressure law, which is linked to the ideal gas law, is consistent with the cosmological redshift of Haug and Tatum: z = R H R H , t 1 , and that this is yet another important piece falling into place in the development of R H , t = c t cosmology. Black hole R H , t = c t cosmology seems robust in addition to outperforming the Λ -CDM model on a series of points (see [12]).

References

  1. E. G. Haug and S. Wojnow. Application of the ideal gas law to the hubble sphere leads to a new hubble sphere radiation pressure law. Cambridge engage, pre-print, 2025. URL https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/679c7c8dfa469535b987c3fb.
  2. M. Planck. Natuerliche Masseinheiten. Der Königlich Preussischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften: Berlin, Germany, 1899. URL https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/93034#page/7/mode/1up.
  3. M. Planck. Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. Leipzig: J.A. Barth, p. 163, see also the English translation “The Theory of Radiation" (1959) Dover, 1906.
  4. E. T. Tatum, U. V. S. Seshavatharam, and S. Lakshminarayana. The basics of flat space cosmology. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5:116, 2015. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2015.52015.
  5. E. G. Haug. CMB, Hawking, Planck, and Hubble scale relations consistent with recent quantization of general relativity theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Nature-Springer, 63(57), 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05570-6.
  6. E. G. Haug and S. Wojnow. How to predict the temperature of the CMB directly using the Hubble parameter and the Planck scale using the Stefan-Boltzman law. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 12:3552, 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2024.1210211.
  7. E. G. Haug and E. T. Tatum. The hawking Hubble temperature as a minimum temperature, the Planck temperature as a maximum temperature and the CMB temperature as their geometric mean temperature. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 12:3328, 2024a. URL https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2024.1210198.
  8. I. de Martino and et. al. Measuring the redshift dependence of the cosmic microwave background monopole temperature with Planck data. The Astrophysical Journal, 757:144, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.044112.
  9. L. Yunyang. Constraining cosmic microwave background temperature evolution with Sunyaev–Zel’dovich galaxy clusters from the ATACAMA cosmology telescope. The Astrophysical Journal, 922:136, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac26b6.
  10. D.A. Riechers, A. Weiss, and F. et al. Walter. Microwave background temperature at a redshift of 6.34 from H2O absorption. Nature, 602:58, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04294-5.
  11. E. G. Haug and E. T. Tatum. Solving the Hubble tension using the PantheonPlusSH0ES supernova database. Accepted and forthcoming Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol 13, no. 2, 2025.
  12. E. G. Haug and E. T. Tatum. How a new type of Rh=ct cosmological model outperforms the Λ-CDM model in numerous categories and resolves the Hubble tension. preprints.org, 2024b. URL https://doi.org/0.20944/preprints202410.1570.v1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated