Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Use of Preoperative TAP – Block with Two Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine: A Comparison in the Perspective of an Opioid-Sparing Approach in Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Submitted:

23 January 2025

Posted:

24 January 2025

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks can provide postoperative analgesia for a variety of surgical procedures. A lot of clinical studies have evaluated TAP block showing positive analgesic effects [1]. In the literature there are not many reports on the use of TAP - Block in abdominal surgery in emergency - urgency setting. We evaluated 12 patients divided into two groups (A, B) who underwent pre-operative TAP - Blocks with two different mixtures of local anesthetic: group A was administered the mixture with Ropivacaine 0.375% and adjuvants, while group B the mixture with Ropivacaine 0.45%, Mepivacaine 0.5% and adjuvants was administered. In group B there was a lower need for opioid administration both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Furthermore, in most cases pain control upon awakening was superior in group B compared to group A.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks can provide postoperative analgesia for a variety of surgical procedures. A lot of clinical studies have evaluated TAP block showing positive analgesic effects [1]. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is a key component of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for the management of postoperative pain. Transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block has contributed to the implementation of this approach in several types of surgical procedures [2].

2. Materials and Methods

Twelve abdominal surgery patients who had the following characteristics were included in the study: emergency surgery, exploratory laparotomy surgery, awakening in the operating room, GCS on awakening >13. Patients who were unable to recover in the operating room were excluded. These patients were given general anesthesia with the administration of intravenous anaesthetics, Fentanyl at a dosage of 100 mcg to cover pain during orotracheal intubation and Rocuronium at a dosage of 1.2 mg/kg to perform IOT in rapid sequence. Six patients were selected in group A for whom a preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP - Block was performed with Ropivacaine 0.375% and adjuvants, at a volume of 20 ml per side, compared with 6 patients included in group B for whom a preoperative ultrasound-guided TAP - Block was performed with Ropivacaine 0.45% + Mepivacaine 0.5% and adjuvants. All patients received an analgesic starter with Paracetamol 1 g iv, with the exception of only one case which was not possible due to reported allergies. In this only case the analgesic starter was carried out through the administration of Clonidine 150 mcg intramuscularly. For each patient, the intensity of pain upon awakening and 24 hours after surgery was assessed using the NRS rating scale, the state of agitation upon awakening and 24 hours after

3. Objectives

In the literature there are not many reports on the use of TAP - Block in abdominal surgery in emergency - urgency setting. We therefore wanted to use this procedure in a different occasion than elective surgery, setting as a primary objective the saving of analgesic drugs (opiates and FANS) both during the maintenance of anesthesia and in the control of post-operative pain. The primary endpoints chosen were pain control during the maintenance of general anesthesia, evaluated through hemodynamic stability and the possible need for administration of opiate analgesic drugs, the sensation of pain upon awakening of the patient and the related state of agitation, evaluated through the NRS and RASS scales, pain control 24 hours after the end of the surgical procedure, evaluated through the NRS and RASS scales.

4. Results

In group A, in four out of six cases, the administration of opiates was necessary while maintaining general anesthesia (Fentanyl or Remifentanil) for optimal pain control, sedation and hemodynamics. In 4 out of six cases, the use of morphine was also necessary to control pain in the 24 hours following the operation. In 2 cases out of 6 the patients complained of pain upon awakening, while in only one case out of six was agitation noted. In group B, only one case required the use of opioids during maintenance, while the prescription of opioids/FANS was never necessary to control post-operative pain in the 24 hours following surgery. Furthermore, upon awakening in only one case out of six did the patient complain of mild pain (NRS 1).
Group A Awake NRS Awake RASS 24h NRS 24h RASS Opioids Mainten. Opioids/FANS TAPO
1 2 1 0 0 YES YES
2 0 0 0 0 YES NO
3 0 0 0 0 YES YES
4 0 0 0 0 NO YES
5 3 0 0 0 NO NO
6 0 0 0 0 YES YES
Group B Awake NRS Awake RASS 24h NRS 24h RASS Opioids Mainten. Opioids/FANS TAPO
1 0 0 0 0 NO NO
2 0 0 0 0 NO NO
3 0 0 0 0 NO NO
4 0 0 0 0 NO NO
5 1 0 0 0 YES NO
6 0 0 0 0 NO NO

5. Discussion

In the literature there are several reports on the use of this procedure both in colorectal surgery [2], in pelvic surgery [4], and in obstetric anesthesia, where it was concluded that the TAP-Block can be considered a safe and effective additional method for pain relief after cesarean delivery [3]. It has been demonstrated that pre-operative TAP - Block with a mixture of local anesthetic Ropivacaine 0.375% and adjuvants is useful in significantly reducing the use of opioid drugs and FANS both for intraoperative and post-operative pain control. However, in many cases, the use of Remifentanil during maintenance of general anesthesia and post-operative pain therapy with an elastomeric pump is often necessary [4]. In this work we studied the possibility of reducing, if not abolishing, the use of intra- and post-operative opioid drugs, with the exception of 100 mcg of Fentanyl necessary for the pain related to orotracheal intubation. It would be interesting to evaluate, on this type of patients, the benefits of opioid-sparing approach on the time of return of normal enteric activity and on hospitalization times, considering the negative effects of opioid drugs on intestinal functionality [5].
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TAP Transversus Abdominis Plane
NRS Numeric Rating Scale
RASS Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale
TAPO Antalgic Post-Operative Therapy

References

  1. Ning Ma · Joanna K. Duncan · Anje J. Scarfe · Susanne Schuhmann · Alun L. Cameron - Clinical safety and effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis - J Anesth, 2016. [CrossRef]
  2. R. Peltrini · V. Cantoni · R. Green · P. A. Greco · M. Calabria · L. Bucci · F. Corcione - Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019. [CrossRef]
  3. Anna Kupiec, Jacek Zwierzchowski, Joanna Kowal-Janicka, Waldemar Goździk, Tomasz Fuchs, Michał Pomorski, Mariusz Zimmer, Andrzej Kübler - The analgesic efficiency of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after caesarean delivery - 2018. [CrossRef]
  4. Francesco Chiancone, Marco Fabiano, Maria Ferraiuolo, Lucia de Rosa, Elena Prisco, Maurizio Fedelini, Clemente Meccariello, Giulio Visciola and Paolo Fedelini - Clinical implications of transversus abdominis plane block (TAP-block)for robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single-institute analysis - 2020. [CrossRef]
  5. Roberto De Giorgio. Furio Massimino Zucco. Giuseppe Chiarioni. Sebastiano Mercadante. Enrico Stefano Corazziari. Augusto Caraceni. Patrizio Odetti. Raffaele Giusti. Franco Marinangeli.Carmine Pinto - Management of Opioid-Induced Constipationand Bowel Dysfunction: Expert Opinion of an Italian Multidisciplinary Panel - 2021. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated