Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Acceleration of Heavy Ions by Ultrafast High-Peak-Power Lasers: Advances, Challenges and Perspectives

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

21 January 2025

Posted:

21 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Laser-driven ion acceleration is a new, rapidly developing field of research and one of the important applications of ultrafast high-peak-power lasers. In this acceleration method, extremely strong electric fields, induced by an ultrafast laser in the plasma generated by the laser-target interaction, enable the acceleration of ions to relativistic velocities on pico-second time scales and at sub-millimetre distances. This opens the prospect of construct-ing a fundamentally new type of high-energy ion accelerator - less complex, more compact and cheaper than the ion accelerators operating today. This paper briefly discusses the basic mechanisms of heavy ion acceleration driven by an ultrafast high-peak-power laser and summarizes the advances in experimental and numerical studies of laser-driven heavy ion acceleration. The main challenges facing this research and the prospects for the application of laser-accelerated heavy ion beams are outlined.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

High-energy heavy ion beams are widely used in nuclear and particle physics. Studies of collisions of heavy ions with very high energies (hundreds of GeV and higher) allow us to understand the structure of matter at its most elementary level, to study the nature of the forces that bind quarks in hadrons or the structure of particles such as protons and neutrons. They also allow us to look back into the past, to the times before the creation of hadrons and to study the early evolution of the universe. Heavy ion beams are also increasingly used in other fields of research, such as high energy-density physics (HEDP), inertial confinement fusion (ICF) or materials science. The basic source of high-energy heavy ions are conventional RF-driven accelerators. Due to the relatively low strengths of the accelerating fields in these accelerators (below ~ 1 MV/cm), acceleration of ions to high energies requires very long acceleration paths, which, combined with other limitations in the design of these accelerators, causes RF-driven accelerators to be very large (up to hundreds of meters in size), complex and expensive devices.
One of the potential alternatives, or at least a significant supplement to conventional ion accelerators, are ion accelerators driven by a laser (e.g. [1,2,3]). The main components of this accelerator are a high-peak-power laser and a target (solid, liquid or gas) placed in a vacuum chamber. When the laser beam intensity is high enough, the interaction of the beam with the target leads to the creation of plasma, i.e. a state of matter composed of free electrons and ions. As a result of the action of the laser field on electrons and ions in the plasma, due to the significant difference in the masses of these particles, a separation of some (usually most) electrons from ions occurs. Between the layer of the electrons and the ions, a very strong quasi-static electric field is created which pulls the ions following the moving electron layer accelerated by the laser field force. The strength of this quasi-static electric field depends on the intensity of the laser beam and can reach values ​​from GV/cm to TV/cm, i.e. values ​​many orders of magnitude higher than those achieved by accelerating fields in conventional accelerators. As a result, ions can be accelerated to high energies over sub-mm distances and in picosecond time periods, i.e. over distances and time periods at least several orders of magnitude shorter than in the case of conventional accelerators (for details see Section 2). Thus, the laser-driven accelerator can be a much smaller, less complex, and much cheaper device than the conventional one.
In addition to smaller dimensions, future laser-driven accelerators may have a number of other properties unavailable to conventional accelerators. The most important of them include many orders of magnitude higher ion beam densities, fluences and intensities and very short ion pulse durations (down to picoseconds or even femtoseconds) (e.g. [3,4]). In the light of current knowledge, it can be assumed that a significant disadvantage of laser-driven accelerators in comparison to RF-driven ones will be a wider energy spectrum of the produced ion beams, lower energy efficiency of the accelerator as a whole (taking into account the energy efficiency of the laser driver) and a lower accelerator repetition rate. It is also possible to suppose that achieving multi-TeV ion energies, currently available in the largest conventional accelerators (e.g. in the LHC accelerator at CERN), will be extremely difficult in the case of laser accelerators.
The above-mentioned features of laser-driven accelerators apply to both light ions (protons, Li ions, C ions, etc.) and heavy ions (Cu, Ag, Au, Pb ions, etc.). However, the requirements for the laser driver ensuring that the ion beam achieves practically useful parameters are usually different for light and heavy ions, and concern primarily the intensity and energy of the laser beam driving ions. In the case of light ions, laser intensities (IL ) below 1012 W/cm2 and sub-joule laser energies (EL), easily achievable by commercially available long-pulse (nano- or sub-nanosecond) lasers, enable obtaining light ion energies of the order of multi-keV/u, which can be useful in some applications. These low requirements meant that the first effects of ion acceleration in laser-generated plasma were observed already in the sixties of the last century [5]. With increasing ion mass (atomic mass number A of the ion) the requirements for laser beam intensity and energy increase. For example, effective acceleration of ions with A ~ 100 - 200 to energy ~ multi-keV/u usually requires an intensity of ~ 1013 - 1014 W/cm2 and an energy (EL ) of ~ 1 J of a long laser pulse, while production of heavy, multi-charged multi-MeV ions requires IL ~ 1015 - 1016 W/cm2 and EL ~ 100 J or higher (e.g. [6]). In the case of ultrafast lasers, i.e. lasers generating pico- or femtosecond pulses, obtaining ion energies similar to those achieved with a long-pulse laser requires higher laser intensities but is usually possible at much lower laser energies (see Section 2 and Section 3).
Long-pulse lasers with parameters enabling heavy ion acceleration to multi-MeV energies were already available in the 1980s, but intensive development of research on heavy ion acceleration using such lasers took place mainly in the years 1990-2010. A summary of the most important results from that period can be found, for example, in [6,7,8]. However, heavy ion beams generated by long-pulse lasers have a number of disadvantages that make their practical use difficult. These include in particular: a wide quasi-Maxwellian energy spectrum, large angular divergence, rather inhomogeneous spatial structure and a complex and poorly controllable ionization spectrum containing a large number of ion charge states. Moreover, due to the long pulse duration and relatively large focal spot of the laser beam (typically, of the order of 100 µm), achieving laser intensities of ~ 1015 - 1016 W/cm2 requires high laser energies in the sub-kilojoule range or higher. At the current level of laser technology, laser systems providing such energies can operate with a very low repetition rate (usually no more than 1 shot every few minutes), which greatly limits the range of possible applications of ion beams generated by such lasers.
Considering the limitations of long-pulse lasers (in particular the limitation of the maximum achievable laser intensity to about 1017 W/cm2) as well as the disadvantages of ion beams produced using these lasers, a real breakthrough in research on laser-driven ion acceleration was the use - at the turn of the last and present century - of high-peak-power ultrafast lasers for these research (see e.g. [1,2,3] and references therein). These lasers have the ability to achieve laser intensities several orders of magnitude higher than achievable in long-pulse lasers at comparable laser pulse energies. They make it possible to achieve not only much higher ion energies, but also to produce ion beams with much better quality than in the case of using a long-pulse laser as an ion driver.
In the last two decades, the development of ultrafast high-peak-power laser technology has been impressive and has resulted in the growth of the energy of these lasers from sub-J to over 100 J, peak power from multi-TW to several PW [9,10] and laser intensity from 1018-1019 W/cm2 to 1022 - 1023 W/cm2 [11,12]. This has allowed the increase of the energy of laser-driven heavy ions from the multi-MeV range to the GeV range (see Section 3). The increase of the peak power of the laser pulse to the level of ~ 100 PW and laser intensity to ~ 1024 W/cm2, expected in the currently designed ultrafast lasers [9,13,14,15], would open the way to the production of heavy ions with energies in the sub-TeV and perhaps TeV range, i.e. with energies comparable to those achieved in the largest conventional heavy ion accelerators currently in operation. Achieving such ion energies in a high-quality laser-generated ion beam, combined with the other unique features of this beam mentioned earlier, would open up the prospect of exploring new research areas in nuclear physics and HEDP, and perhaps in other fields as well.
This paper briefly discusses basic mechanisms of laser-driven ion acceleration and summarizes the advances in research on heavy ion acceleration driven by ultrafast high-peak-power lasers. Also outlines the main challenges facing this research and some potential applications of heavy ion beams produced in laser-driven accelerators. In Section 2, the basic mechanisms of laser-driven ion acceleration, including the mechanisms dominating heavy ion acceleration, are discussed. Section 3 briefly summarizes the most important results of laser-driven heavy ion acceleration studies conducted in the last two decades at moderate (below 1019 W/cm2) and high (up to 1022 W/cm2) ultrafast laser beam intensities. Section 4 presents selected results of numerical studies of heavy ion acceleration at ultra-high intensities of ~ 1023 W/cm2 expected to be achieved in currently operating and emerging multi-PW lasers. Section 5 outlines the main challenges facing research on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration, while Section 6 highlights the prospects for some applications of laser-accelerated heavy ion beams.

2. Basic Mechanisms of Laser-Driven Acceleration of Ions

As mentioned in Introduction, the interaction of an intense laser beam with a target (solid, liquid or gas) results in the creation of a plasma, i.e. a medium composed of electrons and ions. In this plasma, electromagnetic (EM) and hydrodynamic (thermal) forces are induced, which stimulate the movement of electrons and ions.
In the case of relatively low laser intensities (~ 1010 - 1015 W/cm2) and long laser pulses (from tens of ps to tens of ns), the vast majority of plasma ions are accelerated by hydrodynamic forces (thermal pressure of the plasma medium). The ion velocity is relatively small (~ 106 - 108 cm/s), but the number of accelerated ions in the case of dense targets (solid or liquid) can be very large. As a result, the energies of generated ion streams (actually plasma streams, as ions move together with the electron cloud) can constitute from several to several dozen percent of the laser energy. Such ion/plasma streams ablating from the target surface towards the laser (backwards) can in particular accelerate the remaining part of the target in the forward direction (due to the recoil force) and play a fundamental role in hydrodynamic macroparticle accelerators [16,17,18,19] and in inertial nuclear fusion where they are used to accelerate and compress fusion targets containing nuclear fuel (DT or other) [20]. It should be added, however, that also in the plasma generated by long laser pulses, in which the motion of the bulk of ions is determined by hydrodynamic forces, there are also strong EM fields that can accelerate ions to speeds much higher than those achieved due to hydrodynamic motion. These fields arise as a result of the non-uniform distribution of electron density and temperature in the plasma and can produce "supra-thermal" (fast) ions with multi-MeV energies [6,7,8]. The number of these ions is usually 2-3 orders of magnitude smaller than the number of "thermal" ions accelerated by hydrodynamic forces, and as a result the total energy of the fast ion stream is usually a small fraction of the energy of the "thermal" ion stream.
In the case of laser intensities > 1016 W/cm2, the motion of electrons and ions in the laser-generated plasma is determined by EM forces. At laser intensities > 1018 W/cm2 the electrons are accelerated by these forces to speeds close to the speed of light c, hence such intensities are usually called relativistic intensities. The strength of electric fields induced in plasma at relativistic laser intensities can reach enormous values ​​(from GV/cm to TV/cm) and, as a result, these fields can accelerate ions to high velocities vi, including relativistic ones (vi ≈ c), over sub-mm distances. Relativistic laser intensities are now commonly produced by focused beams of high-power ultrafast lasers generating femto- and picosecond pulses, and experimentally demonstrated laser intensities reach 1023 W/cm2 [12]. It is predicted that in currently constructed or designed multi-PW ultrafast lasers, the power of the femtosecond laser pulse will reach 10 - 100 PW, and the laser intensity in the focused beam will be close to 1024 - 1025 W/cm2 [9,13,14,15]. At such laser intensities it seems possible to accelerate ions to energies of ~ TeV, comparable to the energies of ions produced in the largest conventional RF-driven accelerators.
At relativistic laser intensities, the main source of EM forces accelerating ions in the plasma is the Lorenz force F = q E + q (v x B), where q is the charge of the accelerated particle, v is the particle velocity, and E and B are the electric and magnetic parts of the laser field in the plasma. This force interacts with both plasma electrons and plasma ions. However, due to the large mass of the ion, at laser intensities < 1024 W/cm2 the motion of ions due to the direct action of the Lorenz force can usually be neglected and in practice only electrons are set in motion by this force. The electrons are pushed away from the ions (from the equilibrium position) by the force, which results in creating a very strong electric field between the ions and the moving electron cloud. This electric field accelerates the ions, which usually move together with the electron cloud. Since the electric field strength is extremely high, ions can reach high velocities and energies over very short distances (from tens to hundreds of micrometres) and in very short periods of time (from tens of fs to several ps). The detailed mechanism of ion acceleration is determined by the physical conditions of laser-target interaction and depends on both the laser pulse parameters and the target parameters. In the last more than twenty years of research on ion acceleration driven by a short laser pulse of relativistic intensity, several effective acceleration mechanisms have been proposed and investigated. These include: target normal shield acceleration (TNSA) [1,2,3,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) [1,2,3,28,29,30,31,32,33], skin layer ponderomotive acceleration (SLPA) [6,34,35,36], collisionless electrostatic shock acceleration (CESA) [1,2,37], Coulomb explosion acceleration (CEA) [1,2,38,39], laser afterburner acceleration (BOA, sometimes called relativistic induced transparency acceleration - RITA) [1,2,40,41], magnetic vortex acceleration (MVA) [42,43] and solitary ion wave acceleration (ISWA) [44,45]. The actual ion acceleration process usually includes two or more of the mechanisms indicated above and the final parameters of the generated ion beam are the result of the contribution of each of the mechanisms participating in this process.
The acceleration mechanisms listed above basically enable the acceleration of ions with very different atomic mass numbers, A, starting from protons and ending with super-heavy ions with mass numbers A ≥ 200. The effectiveness of the mechanism strongly depends on the mass of the accelerated ion and the laser parameters, in particular the laser intensity and the energy fluence of the laser beam. Particularly large differences, both in terms of the effectiveness of the individual acceleration mechanisms listed above and the required laser parameters, occur between the acceleration of protons and light ions and the acceleration of heavy ions, by which we will understand here ions with mass numbers A >> 10 (e.g. A > 50). The main reasons for these differences are as follows: (1) heavy ions are usually not fully ionized and the ion beam contains multiple ion species with different charge states Z which are simultaneously accelerated by electric fields induced in the plasma, (2) the ratio of the charge q to the mass m of the ion s = q/m = Z/A is much lower than for protons or light ions, which significantly reduces the ion acceleration efficiency, (3) efficient acceleration of heavy ions to high speeds (sub-relativistic or relativistic) is only possible at very high laser intensities (IL ~ 1022 - 1023 W/cm2 or higher); at such high intensities the average charge state Zmean of the ions in the beam is high (Zmean >> 10), which causes the Coulomb explosion of the ions in the beam to have a significant effect on the ion acceleration process, (4) because Zmean >>10, the electron density of the plasma in which the ions are accelerated is much higher than in the case of light ions or protons, which affects the plasma properties; (5) the large masses and energies of heavy ions cause the influence of the electromagnetic field occurring in the acceleration zone and outside this zone on the ion motion to be smaller than in the case of light ions and protons. The above differences between the acceleration of heavy and light ions increase with the increase of the ion mass and are particularly evident in the case of acceleration of super-heavy ions (ions with A ≥ 200).
Recent studies on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration have shown [4,46,47] that to achieve high heavy ion energies (multi-GeV and higher) desired in numerous applications of heavy ion beams (e.g. in nuclear physics, high energy density physics or inertial confinement nuclear fusion), very high laser intensities (so-called ultra-relativistic or ultra-high intensities) reaching values ​​of ~ 1023 W/cm2 or even higher are necessary. Such high intensities are also desirable due to the need to obtain high charge states Z of the ion (due to field ionization of the atom/ion) and thus a high value of the Z/A ratio necessary for achieving high acceleration efficiency [46,47]. At ultra-relativistic laser intensities, the dominant mechanism of heavy ion acceleration is usually the RPA mechanism [4,46,47,48]. This mechanism is a fundamental factor enabling the transformation of laser energy into ion energy and to the greatest extent determines the energy of the vast majority of ions in the generated ion beam. However, the RPA mechanism ends with the termination of the laser pulse irradiating the ion target. After the termination of the laser pulse, the acceleration process is continued by the TNSA mechanism, in which the source of the electric field accelerating the ions is the sheath of high-energy (supra-thermal) electrons produced in laser-plasma interactions. Additionally, since the Coulomb forces acting between highly ionized heavy ions are not fully compensated by the cloud of electrons surrounding the ions, the ions are accelerated by the CEA mechanism. The CEA mechanism becomes important when the ionization level Z of ions is sufficiently high, which usually occurs already in the initial stage of laser-target interaction. This mechanism therefore operates both in the RPA and TNSA acceleration stages. Moreover, if the laser pulse of relativistic intensity is sufficiently long (or the target is sufficiently thin), the RPA acceleration stage can be followed by ion acceleration in the RITA regime. Thus, various acceleration mechanisms can participate in the heavy ion acceleration process and their contribution to and importance in this process depend on the laser and target parameters. For the set of parameters that are achievable currently or in the near future and that potentially enable achieving heavy ion beam parameters useful for applications, the most important of these mechanisms can be considered RPA and TNSA. Below, these mechanisms are described in detail.

2.1. Ion Acceleration by the RPA Mechanism

When a short (fs or ps) laser pulse of relativistic intensity irradiates a dense target, the low-intensity part of the pulse's leading edge is usually intense enough to ionize the target surface and generate a plasma (pre-plasma) on it. The main part of the pulse carrying the vast majority of the laser energy interacts with the pre-plasma and in the skin layer near the surface where the plasma electron density, ne, reaches the so-called critical density nec induces two oppositely directed ponderomotive forces Fp Figure 2.1). Each of these forces acts on the plasma electrons located in the skin layer and the electrons are pushed along the force direction and locally separated from the plasma ions. The system of the electron layer and the ion layer creates the so-called double layer (e.g. [49,50]), which is a region of non-neutral plasma where a large potential drop generates a very strong electric field (the charge separation field) that accelerates the ions. Since, in general, two oppositely directed ponderomotive forces are induced in the skin layer, these forces drive (via the double layer mechanism) two ion bunches moving in the forward and backward directions. This ion acceleration mechanism is sometimes called skin-layer ponderomotive acceleration (SLPA) [6,34,36]. This mechanism can effectively accelerate ions at both relativistic and sub-relativistic laser intensities. In the case where the laser pulse intensity is sufficiently high (> 1020 W/cm2) and the pre-plasma density gradient is high, the forward ponderomotive force (ponderomotive or radiation pressure) clearly prevails over the backward one and only a high-density forward-accelerated (along the laser beam axis) ion bunch is actually produced and accelerated. This high-intensity case of the SLPA mechanism is usually called radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) [1,2,3,28,29,30,31,32,33].
In the RPA mechanism, two stages/regimes of ion acceleration can be distinguished, namely: the hole-boring (HB) stage and the light-sail (LS) stage Figure 2.1) [1,2]. In the HB stage, ions from the front part of the target are accelerated towards the interior of the target by the charge separation field of the forward-moving double layer driven by the pressure of laser radiation. The increase in ion energy is accompanied by an increase in the number of accelerated ions, because the moving (positively charged) ion layer in the double layer acts as a piston on the ions stored in the undisturbed part of the target. The HB stage ends when the ion (plasma) bunch generated in this way reaches the rear surface of the target. After the ion bunch crosses this surface, the LS stage begins. In this stage, the ion bunch is accelerated by the radiation pressure in free space like a sail pushed by the wind. Depending on the target thickness and the laser fluence FL, RPA-HB or RPA-LS dominates the ion acceleration process. When the target is thick enough (or the FL is not high enough), almost all of the laser energy is used to accelerate ions inside the target and thus the acceleration process is dominated by RPA-HB. In contrast, when the target is thin enough (or the FL is high enough), only a small part of the laser energy is used to accelerate ions inside the target and majority of the laser energy is used to accelerate the ion bunch in free space behind the initial target position. Thus, the acceleration process is dominated by RPA-LS.
The most important advantages of the RPA mechanism are as follows [1,2,3]: (1) RPA enables efficient acceleration of both light and heavy ions and laser-to-ions energy conversion efficiency can be very high (can reach several dozen percent); (2) scaling of the RPA-driven ion energy with the laser intensity/fluence is very favourable (Ei ~ (Iτ)α, where α = 2 for vi << c, and α = 1 for the LS mode or α = 1/3 for the HB mode at vi ≈ c); this potentially enables reaching relativistic ion energies of the order of tens of GeV for light ions and up to TeV for heavy ions; (3) the areal ion density, σi, at the source can be high (up to σi ≥ 1020 cm-2) which enables achieving very high ion beam intensities and fluences also at moderate ion energies; (4) it is possible to produce ultra-short ion pulses with durations from tens of fs to ps; (5) the ion beam can have a quasi-monoenergetic ion energy spectrum.
RPA also has a number of disadvantages, in particular: (1) achieving high acceleration efficiency usually requires very high laser intensities (> 1021 W/cm2) and a high laser pulse contrast ratio; (2) the transverse homogeneity of the laser beam driving the ions should be high; (3) circularly polarized laser beams usually provide higher acceleration efficiency and better quality of the generated ion beam than more easily produced linearly polarized laser beams; (4) Rayleigh-Taylor-like (and other) instabilities can occur in the acceleration process and negatively affect the acceleration efficiency and quality of the generated ion beam.
It should be added that due to the high requirements for the laser beam driving ions in the RPA regime, and mainly the requirement of very high laser intensity, experimental studies of RPA are still at an early stage. Current knowledge about the properties of the RPA mechanism and ion beams driven by this mechanism is mainly the result of theoretical and numerical studies. It can be believed that the rapid development of ultrafast multi-PW lasers observed in recent years will significantly accelerate experimental research on ion acceleration by RPA as well as on possible applications of the generated ion beams.

2.2. Ion Acceleration by the TNSA Mechanism

The second acceleration mechanism that has a significant impact on the acceleration process and the properties of the heavy ion beam is the TNSA mechanism [1,2,3,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The idea of this mechanism is illustrated in Figure 2.2. A short, pico- or femtosecond laser pulse irradiating the front surface of the target produces plasma and a stream of hot (fast) electrons with a temperature Th usually in the range of ~ 0.1 - 10 MeV. The electrons penetrate the target and form a Debye sheath on its rear surface, which acts as a virtual, moving cathode. The electric field induced by the cathode: Eac ~ Th/eλDh ~ 1 - 100 GeV/cm (λDh is the Debye length) is very high and easily ionizes atoms accumulated in a thin (~ 5 - 10 nm) layer on the rear surface of the target. The ions generated in this way are accelerated by the virtual cathode at a distance of Lac ~ 10 - 100 µm to an energy of Ei ~ ZeLacEac ~ 1 - 100 MeV (Z is the charge state of the ion). The ions are accelerated mainly in directions close to the normal to the back surface of the target and as a result the angular divergence of the ion beam is relatively small.
The TNSA mechanism can effectively accelerate ions with a high Z/A ratio. It is therefore effective primarily in accelerating protons (Z/A = 1) and highly ionized light ions (e.g. Be, Li, C) for which Z/A ≈ 1/2 [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Protons and such light ions can be generated both from insulators (e.g. polyethylene, polystyrene) and metal targets, the thickness of which is usually in the range of 0.1 - 10 µm. When a metal target is used, the source of protons and light ions is usually hydrocarbon impurities (H, C), which are almost always present on the target surfaces and are efficiently ionized by the TNSA field (sometimes, the back surface of the target is covered with a thin layer of CH or CH2 [51]). In case the goal is to accelerate protons or light ions from metal targets, the low-Z impurities present in these targets are desirable and even essential. However, when the goal is to accelerate heavy ions from high-Z metal targets, these impurities play a negative role, as a significant part of the laser energy is spent on accelerating light ions or protons, which in turn can significantly reduce the efficiency of heavy ion acceleration.
Regardless of the composition and structure of the target, usually only ions from a very thin (≤ 10 nm) layer on the rear surface of the target are efficiently accelerated by the TNSA mechanism. As a result, the areal density σi of the ion source is relatively small, σi < 1017 cm-2, and the ion density in the source ni is moderate, ni < 1019 cm-3. Thus, achieving high ion beam intensities Ii = niviEi (say > 1018 W/cm2) and/or energy fluences Fi = σiEi (say Fi > 1 MJ/cm2) is possible only at very high ion energies (Ei ~ 100 MeV or higher). On the other hand, the total number of accelerated ions can be fairly high (up to Ni ~ 1012 – 1013 [1,2,52]), because due to the transverse transport of fast electrons in the target, the size of the surface from which ions are extracted and accelerated is much larger than the size of the laser beam on the target.
Ion acceleration using the TNSA mechanism has a number of advantages, in particular: (1) moderate requirements for the laser beam quality (both the beam transverse distribution and the laser pulse contrast) and intensity (both relativistic and sub-relativistic laser intensities can be used); as a result, proton beams with energies of ~ 100 MeV can be generated at currently achievable laser intensities; (2) very low transverse emittance of the ion/proton beam; (3) good quality of the transverse energy distribution in the ion/proton beams.
The TNSA method, however, also has a number of disadvantages, which include: (1) a wide (quasi-Maxwellian) ion energy spectrum; (2) relatively low efficiency of laser energy conversion into ion/proton energy (typically ~ 1%, although under certain conditions it is possible to achieve an efficiency of 15% [53]); (3) a relatively slow increase in the maximum ion energy Eimax with increasing laser intensity: Eimax ~ (IL)0.5 [1,2]; (4) a relatively low areal density of ions in the source (< 1017 cm-2), which makes it difficult to achieve very high intensities and fluences of the ion/proton beam at achievable laser intensities. Despite these disadvantages, TNSA is still the most effective and recognized method of proton acceleration with the potential to produce high-quality proton beams.
The above-mentioned advantages of TNSA, and in particular the not too high requirements for laser intensity and beam quality, as well as the possibility of using simple targets that do not require sophisticated technologies, make TNSA the best-known mechanism so far, and ion beams produced by this method have significant application potential. This in turn stimulates further development of research on this acceleration method, in particular in terms of increasing the acceleration efficiency, increasing the ion energy and improving the quality of the ion beam.
The significance of TNSA in the heavy ion acceleration process depends to a large extent on the laser intensity. At relativistic but moderate intensities of ~ 1021 W/cm2 and lower, TNSA can be the dominant mechanism in this process. At such laser intensities, low-Z impurities present on the surface of the high-Z target play an important role, which, as explained above, are effectively accelerated by TNSA and can cause a significant decrease in the efficiency of heavy ion acceleration [54,55,56]. To increase this efficiency, target cleaning from impurities is often used in this case. With increasing laser intensity the role of RPA mechanism in heavy ion acceleration increases (especially when the laser beam is circularly polarized) and at ultra-high laser intensities of ~ 1023 W/cm2 and higher this acceleration mechanism dominates and determines the most important parameters of the ion beam such as mean ion energy, beam fluence and intensity [ 4,46-48]. However, also in this case TNSA plays a significant role, especially in the post-RPA stage of acceleration where TNSA is the dominant mechanism [4,46,47,48]. At ultra-high laser intensities the influence of low-Z impurities on the heavy ion acceleration process is usually small mainly due to the small energy carried by light ions compared to the total energy of heavy ions acquired in the RPA stage of acceleration [46,47,48].

3. Acceleration of Heavy Ions at Moderate and High Laser Intensities

As explained in Section 2, at laser intensities exceeding 1016 W/cm2, the motion of ions in a laser accelerator is primarily determined by quasi-static electric fields induced by the laser in the accelerator plasma. As is known, the efficiency of ion acceleration in an electric field depends on the ratio of the ion charge to its mass, i.e. on the Z/A ratio and increases with the increase of this ratio. Therefore, in order to achieve high acceleration efficiency, one should strive to achieve high values of the Z/A of the ion, which is particularly important in the case of heavy ions (for the purposes of this paper, heavy ions will be understood as ions with the value of A ≥ 50, while ions with A ≥ 200 will be called super-heavy ions). Since the atomic number for heavy elements Za is always less than half the total number of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus, only with very high charge states Z close to Za can we achieve high acceleration efficiency close to that for light ions, usually for which Z/A ≈ 1/2 (for protons Z/A = 1). The key issue in the acceleration of heavy ions, and especially super-heavy ions, is therefore the production in the laser-target interaction process of ions with the highest possible charge state Z. In the case of long laser pulses (sub-ns, ns or longer), achieving high Z values is possible even at relatively low laser intensities (~ 1013 - 1016 W/cm2). In this case, the basic ionization mechanism is electron-ion collisions in the plasma. The long lifetime of the plasma generated by a long-pulse laser (comparable to the laser pulse duration) and relatively high density (> 1020 cm-3) and temperature (up to several keV) enable reaching charge states of heavy ions in this plasma reaching Z ~ 50 - 70 [6,57,58]. However, the ion energies at these laser intensities are rather low, usually in the range 1 - 100 MeV. On the other hand, long-pulse high-energy (~ 100 - 1000 J) lasers make it possible to generate ion streams containing a large number of highly charged ions (up to 1014 - 1015) and with high peak ion currents (up to ~ 100 A) and ion current densities (up to several A/cm2 at 1m from the ion source) [59]. Research on ion acceleration by long-pulse lasers has been conducted for several decades in many research centres around the world. A summary of some of the results of these studies can be found in review papers, e.g. in [6,7,8].
Research on heavy ion acceleration driven by ultrafast lasers, i.e. lasers generating pico- or femtosecond pulses, began at the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, when ultrafast lasers with TW and multi-TW powers became widely available. In the first period of this research, the focus was on the acceleration of heavy ions in the direction opposite to the direction of laser beam propagation (backward direction) produced from relatively thick targets (several dozen µm or thicker). This was due, on the one hand, to the limited access of most researchers to advanced target fabrication technologies (including fabrication of sub-micrometre or nanometre thick targets), and on the other hand, to the rather moderate laser intensities available at that time, covering the range of sub-relativistic and low-relativistic intensities (~ 1018 - 1019 W/cm2). With the increase in power (up to PW and multi-PW) and intensities (up to 1021 - 1022 W/cm2) of laser beams and the easier access to ultra-thin targets and targets with complex structures (see e.g. [60]), the interest of researchers shifted towards the study of forward-accelerated heavy ion beams. Forward accelerated ion beams may have significantly more advantageous properties than backward-generated beams and are more useful in a variety of potential applications. In subsections 3.1 and 3.2, the results of experimental studies on the backward (3.1) and forward (3.2) acceleration of heavy ions by ultrafast lasers in the range of laser intensities from sub-relativistic to relativistic up to 1022 W/cm2 are briefly summarized. This summary includes only some selected results of heavy ion acceleration studies to date, considered by the authors to be representative of this field of research, and does not pretend to be an exhaustive review.

3.1. Backward Acceleration of Heavy Ions

The results of some of the first experiments investigating the backward acceleration of heavy ions driven by a picosecond laser pulse of sub-relativistic intensity were presented in [61,62,63,64]. In these studies, an ultrafast neodymium terawatt laser generating a pulse of 1 ps duration, energy of 0.5 - 1 J and laser beam intensity on the target in the range of 1014 - 1017 W/cm2 was used. Using a diagnostic system containing an electrostatic ion energy analyser (IEA) and a set of ion collectors, the energy and charge state of ions generated backward from massive (thick) metal targets of different atomic numbers were studied. In [61], ion fluxes from a copper target were studied. Cu ions with charge states Z from 1 to 13 were detected by IEA. The ions were generated in two groups: the fast ion group and the low-energy (thermal) ion group. It was found that in the studied range of sub-relativistic laser intensities IL, the mean energy, Emean, of fast ions increases linearly with increasing IL and reaches a maximum value of ~ 300 keV, while Emean for thermal ions increases with intensity proportionally to (IL)1/2 and reaches values below 50 keV. In [62] Ag ion fluxes generated backward at a laser intensity of 5x1016 W/cm2 were studied. Highly charged Ag ions with a maximum charge state Zmax = 29 and Emax = 0.9 MeV were measured. Backward emission of ions from targets with various atomic numbers in the range from 13 (Al) to 79 (Au) was studied in [63]. The most important results of this work are illustrated in Figure 3.1, which presents the measured values of Zmax as a function of the ion atomic number Za for C, O, Al, Fe, Cu, Ag, Ta and Au.
The highest charge states were measured for the heaviest ions: Ta (Zmax = 38) and Au (Zmax = 33). Au and Ta ions also reached the highest energies approaching 1MeV. Current densities of the studied ions at a large distance from the ion source (1 m) were quite high ~ 1 mA/cm2, and the angular divergence of the ion flux did not exceed 30 degrees. In [64] the properties of Au ion streams generated by 1 ps and 0.5 ns pulses with similar energies and focal spots on the target were compared. It was found that although the laser intensities for 1 ps and 0.5 ns pulses differ significantly (8x1016 W/cm for 1 ps vs 2x1014 W/cm2 for 0.5 ns), the maximum charge states and mean energies of Au ions are comparable for these pulses (Zmax = 26 vs Zmax = 32 and 17 keV/u vs 19 keV/u). However, other properties of ion streams generated by ps and sub-ns pulses, as well as ion acceleration mechanisms, differ significantly. In the case of the ps pulse, only one fast ion group with small angular divergence (~ 10 degrees, FWHM) is generated and the probable acceleration mechanism is the SLPA mechanism. In the case of the sub-ns pulse, two or more fast ion groups are generated in a wide solid angle (~ 60 degrees) and it seems that the ion flux properties are largely determined by the self-focusing of the laser beam in the plasma.
Although in works [61,62,63,64] the mechanisms of target plasma ionization and the formation of highly charged ions were not studied, based on the current knowledge it can be assumed that the dominant ionization mechanism was electron-ion collisions. As for the ion acceleration process, not only the SLPA mechanism but also the TNSA-like mechanism arising from the escape of hot (fast) electrons from the plasma could contribute to this process.
It is worth adding that these works also demonstrate the ability to produce highly charged ion fluxes with MeV ion energies by ultrafast low-energy lasers (~1 J), which are currently capable of operating with a high repetition rate (> 1 Hz). This opens up the possibility of using such ion fluxes in some applications, such as ion implantation in near-surface layers of materials to improve their properties.
The first, to our knowledge, experiment demonstrating backward acceleration of heavy ions at relativistic laser intensity was presented in [65]. In this experiment, a 1 ps Nd laser pulse with an intensity of 5x1019 W/cm2 was used to illuminate a thick (2 mm) lead target. Using a Thomson parabola spectrometer (TPS), highly charged Pb ions with Zmax = 46 and peak energy Emax = 430 MeV were detected. It was suggested that the acceleration of Pb ions is a combination of a Coulomb explosion (CEA mechanism) and acceleration by the space charge force from hot electrons which escape the plasma (TNSA-like mechanism).
In [66] the acceleration of ions from a 100-µm iron target driven by a 0.7 ps laser pulse with an intensity of 2x1020 W/cm2 was investigated. The activation method using the 56Fe+12C fusion–evaporation reactions was used to estimate the energy of Fe ions. From the activation measurements the maximum energy of Fe ions was deduced to be about 330 MeV for the unheated iron target and ~ 650 MeV for the target heated to a temperature of 860 Celsius degrees. According to the authors, this almost twofold increase in the energy of Fe ions from the heated target was the result of the removal of hydrocarbon contaminants from the target surface, which significantly reduced the efficiency of heavy ion acceleration.
More detailed studies of heavy ion acceleration were carried out in [67]. The backward and forward acceleration of Pd ions generated from a 25 µm thick palladium target illuminated by a laser pulse of 1 to 8 ps duration and intensity in the range of 5x1019 - 5x1020 W/cm2 was studied. It was found that the backward ion stream contains more ions and higher charge states than the forward stream, while the maximum ion energies are similar in both directions. For a laser intensity of 2x1020 W/cm2, Pd ions with Zmax = 30 and Emax ≈ 400 MeV were detected in the backward stream. The dependence of the maximum Pd ion energy on the laser intensity IL was studied and it was shown that Emax increases proportionally to (IL)1/2.
For backward acceleration of heavy ions at relativistic laser intensities, lasers generating femtosecond pulses have also been used. An example is the work [68], in which a femtosecond laser pulse (25 - 45 fs) with an intensity of 1018 - 2x1019 W/cm2 illuminates an Au-C-Al(or Si) nano-composite target containing Au nanoparticles. It has been shown that in such a laser-target set it is possible to generate Au ion streams with a narrow energy spectrum (energy spread < 10 %), the number of ions up to 9x1010 per shot and the maximum ion energy of ~ 0.5 MeV. According to the authors, the heavy ion stream with the above properties is produced by the thermal pressure of the expanding hot plasma, and not by the electric field induced by hot electrons escaping from the plasma. The results quite similar to those presented in [68], in particular the generation of Au ions with a narrow energy spectrum and a maximum energy of ~ 0.5 MeV were obtained in [69], where a multilayer target containing nanometre-sized Au (5 nm) and C (10 - 40 nm) layers deposited on a 1 mm thick Si substrate was used. The relatively low energy of the ions achieved in these works can be explained by the rather low fluence of the laser pulses used, comparable to the fluence of the picosecond pulse of sub-relativistic intensity used in the experiments [61,62,63,64].
Table 3.1 summarizes the quantitative results of the experiments discussed in this sub-section, relating to the achieved maximum energies and charge states of the accelerated ions. These experiments were carried out in very different physical conditions, in which the differences concerned not only the intensity and duration of the laser pulse and the base target material, but also other parameters influencing the laser-target interaction process, such as the laser pulse intensity contrast or the target structure and thickness. Therefore, the results presented in the table cannot be the basis for determining, for example, the rules for scaling Emax or Zmax changes with increasing laser intensity. Despite this, we have grounds to state that the simultaneous increase in laser intensity and fluence results in a fairly fast (but slower than linear) increase in the maximum energy of heavy ions accelerated backwards, which at a picosecond pulse intensity of ~ 1020 W/cm2 results in the acceleration of heavy ions to sub-GeV energies. On the other hand, in the considered range of laser intensities, the influence of intensity/fluence on the achieved maximum charge state of the ion is small and the value of Zmax is primarily determined by the atomic number and the energy level structure of the ionized atom.

3.2. Forward Acceleration of Heavy Ions

Progress in ultrafast laser technology resulting in increased power and intensity of pico- and femtosecond pulses as well as mastering the technology of producing ultra-thin targets (~ 10 - 100 nm thick) has caused a shift in the interest of researchers involved in laser acceleration of heavy ions from backward acceleration to forward acceleration of ions. Forward acceleration can potentially ensure the production of heavy ion beams with ion energies and other parameters higher than for backward accelerated beams and to a greater extent meet the requirements of various applications of these beams. Research on forward acceleration of heavy ions, both experimental, theoretical and numerical, has developed primarily in the last ten years. During this period, a number of experiments and numerical studies of heavy ion acceleration for high laser intensities in the range of 1020 - 1022 W/cm2 were performed. In this sub-section, we will briefly summarize the most significant results of these studies, including the achieved energies and measured charge states of heavy ions.
The paper [70] reports the results of Fe ion acceleration by a 35-fs laser pulse of energy 8 J and intensity 1021 W/cm2. The ion source was iron impurities on the surface of a 0.8 um thick Al target. Highly charged Fe ions with a maximum energy of 0.9 MeV accelerated by the TNSA mechanism were demonstrated.
In [71] the acceleration of Au ions from an ultra-thin (14 nm) gold foil was studied. The foil was irradiated by a 35-fs laser pulse with an energy of 1.6 J and an intensity of 8x1019 W/cm2. Au ions with a maximum energy of Emax ≈ 200 Mev and a maximum charge state of Zmax ≈ 50 were recorded. Based on theoretical models and particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, it was found that the dominant mechanism of ionization of gold atoms is ionization by the laser field, while the acceleration of highly charged Au ions is significantly enhanced by the Coulomb explosion of ions.
The results of the experiment with Au ion acceleration driven by a sub-picosecond (0.14 ps) laser pulse with an intensity of 8x1020 W/cm2 and energy of several dozen J are presented in [72]. In the experiment, the energy spectra of Au ions from a gold target of 50, 100 and 300 nm thickness were compared for the case of a cold target and a target heated to 500 degrees in order to remove low-Z impurities from the target surface. Based on measurements using the Thomson parabola spectrometer (TPS), it was found that in both cases the energy spectrum has a shape suggesting the dominance of the TNSA mechanism in ion acceleration, with the maximum energies of ions generated from heated targets being higher by a factor of 1.2-1.5 than those of ions produced from cold targets and reaching 1 GeV. However, no significant effect of target heating on the maximum value of the ion charge state was found, and for the target thickness of 100 nm, ions with Zmax ~ 50 were detected in both cases.
In [73] the acceleration of Ag ions from silver targets with thickness in the range of 50 - 800 nm was studied. The ions were driven by a femtosecond (40 fs) laser pulse with intensity of 5x1021 W/cm2 and energy of ~ 10 J. The acceleration of highly charged (Zmax = 45) Ag ions to energy of ~ 2.2 GeV was demonstrated. The measurements were supported by detailed 2D PIC simulations which allowed a deeper insight into the ionization and acceleration mechanisms of ions. It was found that although for lower charge states (Z < 38) the ions can be either field or collisional ionized, for targets thicker than 500 nm, the dominating ionization mechanism for high charge state (Z = 38–47) Ag ions is collisional ionization. Meanwhile, for the thinnest target (50 nm) field ionization dominates, albeit with a significant contribution from collisional ionization. The dominant mechanism of Ag ion acceleration is TNSA, however, for the thinnest target the influence of the RPA-HB mechanism is noticeable. The latter results in higher energy and charge state of ions but leads to target deformation and makes it difficult to control the parameters of the generated ion beam. It has also been shown that laser pulse rising edge with relativistic intensity and length of several hundred fs can effectively remove light contaminants from the surface of a thin target and thus increase the efficiency of heavy ion acceleration.
The paper [11] reports the acceleration of Au ions by a femtosecond (22 fs) laser pulse with an intensity of 1.1x1022 W/cm2, the highest used in heavy ion acceleration experiments performed to date. Using a double-layer target composed of a 60-µm carbon nanotube foam (CNF) layer and a 150-nm gold layer, the acceleration of Au ions with Emax = 1.2 GeV and Zmax = 61 was demonstrated. The ion energies from the double-layer target were a factor of ~ 1.7 higher than those achieved with the single-layer Au target. Based on 2D PIC simulations, it was found that the main reason for the increased ion energy from the double-layer target is the extension of the ion acceleration time due to the presence of the CNF layer.
A similar experiment as in [11] but with a much longer pulse of 0.5 ps duration was performed in [75], where a laser pulse with an intensity of 4x1020 W/cm2 and energy of about 180 J irradiated an Au target (heated or unheated) of thickness 25, 45, 100, 300 or 500 nm. The measured energy spectra and charge state distributions of Au ions showed a significant dependence on the target thickness. The highest ion energies with Emax = 1.4 - 1.5 GeV and the highest Au ion charge state Zmax = 72 were measured for the heated target of thickness 100 nm. It was noted that the achieved value of Zmax is the highest among the Au ion charge states measured so far in experiments with laser-driven acceleration of heavy ions. It was found that the recorded charge state distributions of Au ions are difficult to explain using the established ionization models applied in studies on laser acceleration of heavy ions.
The results of the study of the acceleration of Au ions driven by a high-energy sub-picosecond laser were also reported in [76,77]. In [76], a laser pulse of 0.85 ps duration, intensity (3-5)x1020 W/cm2 and energy of 200 J irradiated a gold target of several dozen nm thickness. Au ions with a maximum energy of 1.6 GeV and a charge state of +58 were detected.
In [77] the Au ion fluxes generated from an ultra-thin (15 nm or 30 nm) gold target irradiated by a 0.8 ps laser pulse of intensity ~ 3x1020 W/cm2 and energy ~ 175 J were measured. In the case of the 15 nm target, the energy spectra of Au ions with a distinct quasi-monoenergetic peak extending from 1 GeV to 2 GeV with mean energy ~ 1.5 GeV and the number of ions on the order of 1012 particles per steradian were recorded. According to the authors, this was the first experimental observation demonstrating laser-driven generation of a quasi-monoenergetic beam of super-heavy ions. Particle-in-cell numerical simulations have shown that under physical conditions corresponding to those in the experiment, three stages of acceleration, namely the TNSA, RPA and RITA stages, can be distinguished. In such conditions, the generation of a quasi-monoenergetic spectral peak seems to be the result of the appropriate relationship between the durations of the RPA and RITA stages. Based on the simulations performed, it has also been found that at very high intensities ( up to > 1022 W/cm2) achievable with multi-PW lasers, the generation of heavy ion beams with a narrow energy spectrum is also possible provided that an appropriate control of the laser pulse duration is ensured and the duration is well matched to the target thickness.
Table 3.2 summarizes the results of measurements of the maximum charge states and maximum energies of heavy ions forward accelerated by short (fs or sub-ps) laser pulses with relativistic intensity in the range from ~ 1020 W/cm2 to ~ 1022 W/cm2. As expected, the Zmax values ​​increase with increasing atomic/mass number of the ion and are the highest for Au ions (Za = 79) for which they reach up to Zmax = 72. In the studied cases, ionization of target atoms was usually the result of a combination of collisional ionization with field ionization, therefore Zmax depends not only on the laser intensity, IL, but also on the laser pulse duration, τL, and the target thickness, LT (an increase in τL and LT can increase the number of electron-ion collisions and lead to an increase in the ionization probability). The maximum ion energies achieved in the considered laser intensity range reach up to ~ 2 GeV. They depend on IL, but the key parameter determining these energies seems to be the laser fluence FL = ILτL. The maximum ion energy depends of course on the target thickness. Reducing LT favours increasing Emax, but usually leads to a decrease in the number of generated ions. Therefore, obtaining the desired values ​​of Zmax and Emax requires an optimal balance between at least three parameters of the laser-target system: IL, FL (or τL) and LT.
In parallel with the experimental research, theoretical studies on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration were conducted, based primarily on numerical simulations using particle-in-cell (PIC) codes [55,56,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86]. Usually, two-dimensional (2D PIC) codes were applied, and sometimes one-dimensional (1D PIC) and three-dimensional (3D PIC) codes were used. Numerical simulations were performed for relativistic laser intensities in the range from ~ 1020 W/cm2 to ~ 1022 W/cm2, achievable by ultrafast lasers in the last decade, and laser pulse durations from ~ 30 fs to 600 fs. The acceleration of super-heavy ions (Au) was most often studied [55,56,77,81,82,84,85,86], but also the acceleration of heavy ions with lower mass numbers such as Fe ions [78,79,80] or Cu ions [83] was investigated. In the simulations, targets of various thicknesses and structures were used, starting from sub-micrometre flat single-layer targets (with thicknesses from 10 nm to 500 nm) [55,77,79,83,84,85] to double-layer [56,80,81,82,83,86] and multi-layer [78] targets composed of layers with different atomic numbers. The studies carried out covered a very wide range of issues and concerned in particular: acceleration mechanisms (e.g. identification of conditions for the occurrence/dominance of the RPA, TNSA, RITA or CEA mechanism [55,81]), mechanisms of ionization of target atoms and accelerated ions [83,84,85], properties of generated ion beams and their dependence on laser parameters (e.g. intensity or duration of the laser pulse [55,81,84]) and/or target parameters [83,85,86], and many other issues. These studies enabled a fairly comprehensive understanding of the heavy ion acceleration process in the studied range of laser intensities, improved theoretical models of this process and opened the way to improving the parameters and quality of generated heavy ion beams.
In summary, the increase in the peak power of ultrafast lasers from the TW level to the PW level observed in the last two decades and the accompanying increase in laser intensity by several orders of magnitude, up to the level of 1022 W/cm2, resulted in the increase in the energy of accelerated heavy ions from ~ 1 MeV to ~ 1 GeV, as well as a significant increase in other ion beam parameters such as beam intensity and fluence or the number of generated multi-charge high-energy ions. Theoretical and numerical studies on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration conducted during this period significantly expanded our knowledge of this process, helped explain and interpret measurement results, and also pointed the way towards further improvement of the parameters of generated heavy ion beams.

4. Acceleration of Heavy Ions at Ultra-High Laser Intensities

The results of the studies summarized in Section 3 have shown that at laser intensities in the range of 1020 - 1022 W/cm2 it is possible to produce heavy ions, including super-heavy ions, with energies of ~ 1 GeV. However, for most of the potential applications of heavy ions in such domains as nuclear physics, particle physics, HEDP or ICF, ion energies of multi-GeV and higher, up to ~ TeV, are required. Achieving such ion energies seems possible at ultra-high intensities of ~ 1023 - 1024 W/cm2 or higher. Recently constructed multi-PW femtosecond lasers [9,10,11,12] enabling generation of ultra-high laser intensities of ~1023 W/cm2 [12] and designed fs lasers with pulse powers up to 100 PW and laser intensities of ~1024 W/cm2 [9,13,14,15] allow us to believe that laser-driven acceleration of heavy ions, including super-heavy ions, to energies of tens or even hundreds of GeV is feasible and will be experimentally demonstrated in the near future. Production of ion beams with such ion energies and other beam parameters enabling their effective use in various possible applications requires comprehensive studies, both experimental and theoretical-numerical. Although laser intensities of 1023 W/cm2 have already been demonstrated [12], experimental studies on the acceleration of heavy ions at such intensities and higher are still at the design stage. Currently, only theoretical and numerical studies of heavy ion acceleration at ultra-high laser intensities are possible. It can be believed that they will allow for the understanding of the acceleration mechanisms and properties of heavy ion beams generated at such intensities, will be helpful in the design and preparation of appropriate experiments and will outline the perspectives of various applications of such beams.
These studies are currently being developed, but are still at a very early stage [4,46,47,87,88,89,90,91]. They require advanced numerical tools, including PIC codes that take into account physical phenomena that do not occur at lower laser intensities, such as, for example, radiative losses due to the emission of synchrotron radiation by ultra-relativistic electrons produced by the laser [92,93,94,95] and, at intensities approaching 1024 W/cm2, also quantum effects (e.g. production of electron-positron pairs and a cascade of other phenomena) [87,91,93,94].
In this section, we will present selected results of numerical studies of heavy ion acceleration at laser intensities of ~ 1023 W/cm2 performed recently by the authors of this article. The numerical simulations underlying this study were performed using the multi-dimensional (2D3V) PICDOM code [96], which takes into account, in particular, the dynamic ionization of target atoms and accelerated ions, as well as the radiation losses induced by the synchrotron radiation emission. Most of the results of this study have not been published so far. In Section 4.1 we present the results of studies on the acceleration of super-heavy ions driven by a multi-PW femtosecond laser pulse, while in Section 4.2 we show some results obtained for heavy ion beams accelerated by a high-energy (> 100 kJ) picosecond laser pulse, made with the aim of using such beams in inertial confinement thermonuclear fusion.

4.1. Acceleration of Super-Heavy Ions by a Multi-PW Femtosecond Laser

The results of studies discussed in this sub-section are based on PIC simulations of the acceleration of super-heavy ions generated from ultra-thin (≤ 100 nm) solid-state-density Au, Pb, Bi or U targets irradiated by a 30 fs circularly polarised laser pulse with a wavelength of 0.8 µm, a beam width (FWHM) dL = 3 µm and a peak intensity from 5x1022 W/cm2 to 2x1023 W/cm2. Such laser pulse parameters are expected to be achieved in ultrafast multi-PW lasers already in operation or under construction [9,10,11,12]. It was assumed that the targets have the same areal mass density equal to σ = ρLT =1.36 g/m2, where ρ is the mass density and LT is the thickness of the target (this areal mass density corresponds to the thicknesses of the Au, Pb, Bi and U targets of 50.5 nm, 100 nm, 119 nm and 51.4 nm, respectively). More details about the simulation parameters can be found in [47].
As already stated in Section 3, the efficiency of heavy ion acceleration strongly depends on the ratio of the charge state of the ion to its atomic mass, i.e. the Z/A ratio. Achieving high values of this ratio, enabling highly effective acceleration of super-heavy ions (A ≥ 200), therefore requires achieving very high values of the charge state Z, which is not easy due to the high ionization potentials of such ions. In the acceleration of super-heavy ions, ionization processes play a much more important role than in the case of light ions for which, due to relatively low ionization potentials, achieving high values of the Z/A ratio is much easier. In particular, light ions completely devoid of electrons can be obtained at relatively low laser intensities of ~ 1020 - 1021 W/cm2 and ionization of the (ultra-thin) target occurs almost instantaneously (usually within a few fs). So in the case of light ions we usually deal with acceleration of one type of ion with a charge state Z = Za ≈ 1/2 A (Za is the atomic number of the target atom). In the case of super-heavy ions/atoms, even at ultra-high intensities ≥ 1023 W/cm2 achieving full ionization of the atom (ions completely stripped of electrons) is usually not possible, the target ionization is not instantaneous (it lasts at least several dozen fs) and the generated plasma is a collection of many types of ions with various charge states. Although at ultra-high laser intensities the process of ionization of atoms and ions seems less complex than for lower intensities (<< 1023 W/cm2), because only one type of ionization - field ionization - occurs (impact ionization is negligible), the ionization spectrum of super-heavy ions is usually very complex. Knowledge of the properties of this spectrum is therefore essential for understanding the acceleration process of such ions and its possible optimization.
Figure 4.1 presents the ionization spectrum of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions in the final stage of ion acceleration by a 30 fs laser pulse with an intensity of IL = 1023 W/cm2. As can be seen, the structure of the ionization spectrum in the final acceleration stage for all the super-heavy ions studied is fairly similar. In each of the cases considered, a large number of ion species with different charge states are produced, but in each case the spectrum is dominated by Ne-like ions and Ni-like ions. As shown in [47], Ne-like ions are actually created only by the laser field in the RPA acceleration stage, while ions with lower charge states are created by both the laser field and the TNSA-like field induced in the plasma by relativistic laser-generated electrons. Both the average charge state Zmean of the ions and the absolute value of the charge state of the Ne-like ions increase with the increasing atomic number of the target Za. With the increasing Za, the ratio of the population of Ne-like ions to the population of Ni-like ions also increases and in the case of uranium, the population of Ne-like ions clearly dominate the population of other ion types. Except for a small number of ions with a charge state higher than that of the Ne-like ions, the latter have the highest Z/A ratio and thus their acceleration efficiency should be the highest (see below).
Two-dimensional (2D) distributions of charge state and density of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions are presented in Figure 4.2. The charge state distributions of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions are similar. Low-energy ions, concentrated close to the initial target position (x = 1 µm) have low charge states, while high-energy ions are highly charged ions with very similar charge states (for these ions practically one colour dominates in each of the four presented distributions). As a more detailed analysis shows, the high-energy ions, especially those propagating near the laser axis (y = 0) are dominated by Ne-like ions with charge state 69 for Au, 72 for Pb, 73 for Bi and 82 for U. The 2D density distributions of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions are also similar to each other and their shape largely reproduces the shape of the ion charge state distributions. As it results from the analysis of acceleration stages earlier than those in Figure 4.2, in the first stage of acceleration, lasting for a period close to the laser pulse duration, the RPA mechanism dominates - first RPA-HB and then RPA-LS. In this stage, a dense bunch of high-energy highly charged ions is formed, which propagates forward near the laser axis. In the post-RPA stage, ions are accelerated mainly by the TNSA mechanism. This mechanism leads to an increase in ion energy but also to a broadening of the ion energy spectrum. In the post-RPA stage, the CEA (Coulomb explosion acceleration) mechanism also has a significant influence on the properties of the ion beam. CEA accelerates ions in all directions, especially in directions transverse to the beam axis, which results in the scattering of a significant part of ions into a large solid angle (this can be seen in Figure 4.2 and an increase in the angular divergence of the ion beam, as well as a broadening of its energy spectrum. As a result of the destructive influence of CEA on the generated ion beam (and partly also TNSA and plasma instabilities), only the paraxial part of the ion beam has a relatively small angular divergence (see below) enabling its propagation over distances significantly exceeding the size of the ion source without a dramatic decrease in ion density. Moreover, in this part of the beam, ions with the highest energy and the highest charge state are accumulated. This allows us to assume that the paraxial part of the beam is the most useful from the point of view of potential applications of laser-accelerated super-heavy ions.
Since the properties of the ion beams illustrated in Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2 and described above are qualitatively very similar for Au, Pb, Bi, and U ions, we will demonstrate other properties of the super-heavy ions only for one of the considered ion types, namely Au ions.
Figure 4.3 shows the energy spectra of Au ions for Ne-like ions and several other high-charge, high-energy ion species for the whole ion beam (a) and for the paraxial beam (b). The paraxial beam was selected from the whole gold ion beam by a 5-µm diaphragm placed on the axis (y = +- 2.5 µm) at a distance of x = 30 µm from the target. It can be seen that for both the whole ion beam and the paraxial beam the high-energy part of the spectrum extending from ~2 GeV to ~60 GeV is dominated by Ne-like ions, while the contribution of the other ion species to this part of the spectrum for the paraxial beam is clearly smaller than for the whole beam.
The dominance of Ne-like ions (Z = 69) in the generated Au ion beam is even better seen in Figure 4.4, which shows the numerical values of the total energy carried by Au ions with charge state Z (a) as well as the mean (b) and maximum (c) energies of these ions for the whole ion beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red). In the case of the whole beam, Ne-like ions carry 90% of the beam energy, while in the case of .the paraxial beam the energy stored in Ne-like ions exceeds 95% of the (paraxial) beam energy. Moreover, in both cases the mean and maximum energy of Ne-like ions is much higher than those of the other ion species. We can therefore state that the generated Au ion beam, especially the paraxial beam, is actually a mono-charge beam. As shown in [46,47] the dominance of Ne-like ions in beams of super-heavy (A ≥ 200) ions accelerated by an ultra-high intensity laser pulse is an inherent feature of these beams in a rather wide range of intensities around 1023 W/cm2, resulting from the matching of the laser intensity to the energy level structure of super-heavy ions.
Significant differences between the characteristics of the whole generated Au ion beam and its paraxial part, which largely determine the usefulness of the ion beam in possible applications, are especially clearly visible in the angular distributions of mean ion energy and ion energy fluence FiiEi. This is illustrated in Figure 4.5. As can be seen, the angular distributions of both ion fluence and mean ion energy for the whole beam are much wider than for the paraxial beam. This is the result, on the one hand, of the contribution to the acceleration process of the CEA mechanism pushing ions in directions transverse to the beam axis, and on the other hand, of the inhomogeneity of the spatial distribution of the laser beam intensity, which causes the generation (on the slopes of the distribution) of ponderomotive forces directed transverse to the beam axis and accelerating electrons and ions at a large angle to the axis.
The angular divergence of the paraxial beam (measured by the width of the angular distribution of the fluence or energy of ions) increases with the increasing width of the beam-limiting aperture, dap. It is obvious that with the increase of dap the beam energy Eb and the number of ions Ni in the beam will increase. However, the utility of the ion beam is determined not only by Eb and Ni, but also by many other beam parameters that can be controlled by changing the dap. Figure 4.6 shows the dependence of Ni and the ion beam energy fluence (averaged over the aperture area), Fb, in the Au ion beam on the aperture width dap. As can be seen, although the number of ions increases with the increase of the aperture size, the ion beam energy fluence Fb decreases with the increase of dap and is the highest for the paraxial beam. This is because the average ion energy takes the highest values in the paraxial region. Thus, although the total ion energy and the number of ions in the whole beam are higher than for the paraxial beam, other beam parameters that determine its usability, such as the mean and maximum ion energy and the beam intensity and fluence, are clearly higher for the paraxial beam.
It can be expected that with the increase of the laser pulse intensity, IL, the energy of Ne-like ions, dominating in the ion beam and determining its main parameters, will increase. However, since the number of generated Ne-like ions depends on the degree of matching of the laser intensity to the structure of energy levels of gold atoms, it is not clear whether other parameters characterizing the beam, in particular the total energy carried by Ne-like ions, Eb , and the efficiency of conversion of laser energy to Ne-like ions, η, will also increase with the increase of IL. The answer to this question can be found in Figure 4.7 and Figure 4.8, which show the dependence of Emean and Emax as well as Eb and η on the laser intensity IL for the whole Au ion beam and the paraxial beam.
As expected, the mean and maximum energy of Ne-like ions increases with increasing laser intensity for both the whole beam and the paraxial beam. However, the dependence of the efficiency of laser energy conversion into Ne-like ion energy η is more complex. For the whole beam, this dependence has a non-monotonic course with a maximum near IL = 1023 W/cm2, while in the case of the paraxial beam, the conversion efficiency decreases with increasing IL. This results from the fact that the optimal laser intensity ensuring the maximum efficiency of ionization of gold atoms to the charge state corresponding to Ne-like ions lies in the intensity range of (3.3 - 8.9) x 1022 W/cm2 [47], i.e. close to the lowest IL value assumed in the simulations whose results are presented in Figure 4.7 and Figure 4.8.
In summary, the results presented in this sub-section have shown that the dominant mechanism of acceleration of super-heavy ions from sub-micrometre targets at ultrahigh laser intensities is RPA, but TNSA and CEA also have a noticeable effect on the final parameters of the ion beam. Although TNSA and CEA mechanisms increase the ion energy achieved in the RPA acceleration stage, they also lead to an increase in the beam angular divergence and a broadening of its energy spectrum. In the RPA stage, the target atoms and then the resulting ions are ionized by the laser field, while in the post-RPA stage additionally by the field induced in the plasma by high-energy electrons generated by the laser. Despite the fact that many ion species with different charge states are created in the ionization process, at laser intensities of ~ 1023 W/cm2 the vast majority of the beam energy is carried by Ne-like ions (e.g. for Au Z = 69), which also have much higher mean and maximum energies than the other ion species. This mono-chargeability of super-heavy ion beams is an inherent feature of these beams resulting from matching the laser intensity to the energy level structure of super-heavy atoms. The efficiency of laser energy transformation into the energy of a super-heavy ion beam accelerated by a femtosecond pulse of ultra-high intensity is very high and can exceed 30%. However, for potential applications the paraxial part of the beam seems to be the most useful. The paraxial beam is actually a mono-charge beam (Ne-like ions carry over 95% of the beam energy), and has a small angular divergence enabling its practical use at large distances from the target.

4.2. Acceleration of Heavy Ions by a High-Energy Picosecond Laser

As shown in Section 4.1, using multi-PW lasers generating femtosecond pulses with ultra-high intensity of ~1023 W/cm2 it is possible to produce heavy ion beams with ion energies of ~100 GeV and ion beam energies Eb approaching 100 J. However, some potential applications of laser-accelerated heavy ion beams require much higher parameters than those achievable using femtosecond lasers. These include inertial confinement (thermonuclear) fusion (ICF) in the so-called ion fast ignition (IFI) option, in which a nuclear fuel (usually deuterium-tritium - DT) compressed to high densities is ignited by an intense ion beam [97,98,99,100,101]. Achieving fuel ignition in the IFI option of ICF requires a picosecond ion beam (light or heavy ions) with extremely high parameters, in particular the beam energy Eb > 10 kJ and the beam intensity Ib ~ 1020 W/cm2 [100,102]. Moreover, the mean ion energy in the quasi-monoenergetic energy spectrum should be well matched to the fuel density, and in the case of heavy ions it should usually be of the order of 100 MeV/u. Achieving such beam parameters in conventional RF accelerators in the foreseeable future is rather unlikely, but it seems possible using picosecond lasers with very high energy above 100 kJ. The possibility of achieving the beam parameters required for IFI by heavy ion beams driven by a picosecond laser with energy of 150 - 250 kJ was investigated by the authors of this paper and presented in [48]. Example results of these studies, obtained from simulations using the PICDOM code, are shown in Figure 4.9 and Figure 4.10. They illustrate how the ion beam parameters crucial for thermonuclear ignition depend on the atomic number of the ion accelerated by a picosecond laser with energy of 200 kJ. The comparison presented in these figures was made for ions produced from Al, Ti, Cu, Ag and Au targets with the same areal mass density σ = ρLT = 2.2 mg/cm2.
As can be seen from Figure 4.9, for all considered ion types it is possible to produce an ion beam with a quasi-monoenergetic spectrum, however the width of the spectrum and the mean energy of the ions, Emean, depend on the type of ion. The narrowest spectrum and the highest Emean value of ~ 100 MeV/u are found for Cu ions. The observed differences in the energy spectra of the considered ion types result from differences in the Z/A ratio for these ions, as well as from certain differences in the acceleration mechanisms of these ions [48].
The dependence of the parameters determining the possibility of thermonuclear ignition in the IFI option, i.e. the peak fluence and energy of the ion beam, as well as the peak intensity and duration of the beam, on the type of accelerated ion is presented in Figure 4.10. As can be seen, the highest values of fluence, energy and intensity of the ion beam and the shortest ion pulse duration are obtained for Cu ions. Moreover, in the case of the Cu ion beam, the absolute values of these parameters meet the IFI requirements for the conditions considered, while for the remaining ion types only some of these requirements are met.
The presented results prove that for fixed laser parameters (energy, power and intensity) it is possible to identify the type of ion with the optimal mass number A ensuring the achievement of the highest values of ion beam parameters determining thermonuclear ignition. It should be noted, however, that for a given laser power and energy, changing the laser beam intensity (e.g. by changing the laser focal spot size on the target) can lead to a change in the optimal ion mass. It can be expected that increasing the laser intensity will result in a shift of the optimal ion mass towards higher values of A, while decreasing the intensity will lead to a shift of the optimal mass towards lower values of A.
In conclusion, the studies conducted by the authors of this article - the example results of which are presented above - have shown that achieving thermonuclear ignition of DT fuel by a heavy ion beam is basically possible with realistic laser and fusion target parameters.

5. Challenges Facing Research on Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration

Despite the significant progress in the laser-driven heavy ion acceleration research over the past two decades, this research can still be considered to be in its early stages. There are many challenges ahead of this research, both cognitive and technological, especially when viewed from the perspective of potential applications of future laser-driven ion accelerators. Below we outline the more important of these challenges.
As shown earlier in this article, unlike a beam of light ions, a beam of laser-accelerated heavy ions contains a large number of ion species with different values of the charge state to ion mass ratio Z/A. Since this ratio determines the efficiency of ion acceleration by laser-induced electric fields in the plasma and is distributed heterogeneously in the plasma, this multi-charge of the ion beam is one of the most important, inherent properties of the heavy ion beam, which determines to a large extent other beam characteristics such as the energy spectrum of accelerated ions, the beam angular divergence, the degree of spatial homogeneity of the beam parameters (ion energy, beam fluence and intensity) or the energy efficiency of beam acceleration. For this reason, the key challenge for heavy ion acceleration is to find ways to control the beam ionization spectrum. The discovery of the possibility of generating a mono-charge beam of super-heavy ions by matching the laser intensity to the energy level structure of the ion/atom at ultra-high intensities [46,47] is an important step forward towards controlling the ionization spectrum of heavy ions. However, further progress is needed in this matter, in particular finding ways to control this spectrum for various types of ions and different laser beam parameters is still an important and current research task.
In many potential applications of laser-accelerated heavy ion beams, a narrow energy spectrum of the ions is desirable. Unfortunately, the energy spectrum of heavy ions demonstrated in real or numerical experiments performed today is broad (usually ΔE/<E> ~ 1 or wider) at both moderate and high laser intensities. Basically, with the help of appropriate transport and selection systems, a part of this spectrum with a small width (e.g. ΔE/<E> ~ a few percent) can be separated, however, this is usually associated with huge beam energy losses, which may put in question the usefulness of the ion beam. The main reason for the broad spectrum of heavy ions, apart from the multi-charge of the ion beam mentioned above, is the complex process of heavy ion acceleration in which a significant role is usually played by no less than three acceleration mechanisms: RPA, TNSA, CEA (with a suitably thin target and/or a suitably long laser pulse, the RITA mechanism may also play an important role in this process). TNSA and CEA generally cause broadening of the energy spectrum, so minimizing their contribution to the acceleration process may be a way to narrow the spectrum. Minimizing the contribution of these two mechanisms may, however, be associated with a decrease in the maximum and mean ion energy and, consequently, with a decrease in other parameters such as beam intensity and fluence. Even if TNSA and CEA were eliminated from the acceleration process, the RPA acceleration is also not free from factors causing spectrum broadening such as non-uniform temporal and spatial distribution of laser beam intensity - resulting in a non-uniform distribution of ion velocities already at the initial stage of acceleration - or plasma instabilities (Raileigh-Taylor and others) developing during acceleration. Generating a beam of heavy ions with a narrow energy spectrum while maintaining the highest possible energy efficiency of acceleration is therefore a very difficult task waiting to be solved.
Different potential applications of laser-driven heavy ions have different requirements for ion energy and the spectrum of desired ion energies ranges from sub-MeV to TeV. Experimentally measured energies of heavy ions (mainly Au ions) accelerated at laser intensities not exceeding 1022 W/cm2 reach 2 GeV (see Table 3.2), while the maximum energies of super-heavy ions demonstrated in numerical simulations reach values of ~ 100 GeV at IL ≈ 1023 W/cm2 [47] and ~ 200 GeV at IL ≈ 7x1023 W/cm2 [91]. Studies carried out so far show that a natural way to increase the ion energy is to increase the intensity and/or energy (actually fluence) of the laser pulse. The increase in ion energy is, however, limited by many factors, which are particularly evident in the case of relativistic ions and ultra-high laser intensities. One of the known and obvious factors in the case of relativistic ions is the increase in ion mass with the increase in its velocity (at the Au ion energy of 1 TeV, the ion mass is 6 times higher than its rest mass). Another factor that may play an important role in the acceleration of such ions is the limitation of ion velocity associated with the limited group velocity of the laser beam [103,104]. With the increase in IL values in the region of ultra-high laser intensities ≳ 1023 W/cm2, "parasitic" phenomena limiting ion energy intensify. A particularly important "parasitic" phenomenon accompanying ion acceleration is the emission of electromagnetic radiation by relativistic electrons produced in laser-plasma interactions. It is the result of multiphoton Thomson and/or Compton scattering, in which an electron absorbs many photons from a laser beam and then scatters them into a single high-energy emitted photon. The value of the parameter χe ≈ 0.09IL[1023 W/cm2]λ[µm] [105,106] determines whether the radiation emission process is of classical or quantum nature. If χe ≪1 then the radiation emission process has a classical nature and is described by multiphoton Thomson scattering, while if χe ≳1 (IL ≳ 1.1x1024 W/cm2 at λ = 1µm) then the process has a quantum nature and is described by multiphoton Compton scattering. In the presence of a strong laser field, the high-energy photons produced in this process can produce electron-positron pairs by the Breit-Wheeler or the Trident process. The electrons and positrons produced in such a way can produce further photons by Compton scattering and further electron-positron pairs, leading to the formation of QED (quantum electrodynamic) cascades. The increase in laser intensity leads to the intensification of the above and other possible "parasitic" processes and at certain intensities the laser energy losses associated with these processes can be so large that the ion acceleration process enters saturation. In the case of acceleration of heavy ions the quantitative influence of "parasitic" processes occurring during the interaction of ultra-intense light with plasma on ion acceleration is not known. It is therefore not known whether acceleration of heavy ions to TeV energies is feasible and if so what are the physical conditions enabling the achievement of such ion energies. Clarifying the above issues and possibly developing an efficient method of accelerating ions to such energies seems to be one of the most serious scientific challenges facing laser-driven heavy ion acceleration.
An important parameter of the ion beam, which largely determines its practical utility, is the angular divergence of the beam. The complexity of the heavy ion acceleration process, and in particular the occurrence of several acceleration mechanisms and the variety of accelerated ion species, causes the angular divergence of the heavy ion beam to be generally large, usually much larger than in the case of light ions. Among several factors influencing the angular distribution of energy, fluence or intensity of generated ions, the most specific factor for heavy ions is the significant contribution to the acceleration process of the CEA mechanism. This mechanism accelerates ions in all directions, including directions transverse to the laser beam axis. If at certain acceleration stages the CEA contribution becomes comparable to the RPA contribution, then a significant part of the ions is accelerated in directions transverse to the main ion propagation direction, which is usually the laser beam propagation direction. An important factor influencing the angular divergence of the ion beam is also the non-uniform spatial distribution of the laser beam intensity, which results in the generation of ponderomotive forces directed transverse to the beam axis and accelerating ions in non-axial directions. As shown in Section 4.1, the angular divergence of the heavy ion beam can be significantly reduced (from > 60 degrees to ~ 10 degrees) by selecting from the whole beam its paraxial part with a transverse size comparable to the laser beam size. However, this is associated with a significant loss of the total ion energy, and thus a significant reduction in the efficiency of laser-to-ions energy conversion. Finding a way to produce a beam of heavy ions with a small angular divergence while maintaining high energy efficiency of acceleration remains an important problem waiting for an effective solution.
An important parameter of a laser-driven accelerator, which largely determines the size and compactness of the accelerator, is the laser-to-ions energy conversion efficiency η. In heavy ion acceleration, the value of this parameter usually increases with increasing laser intensity and at ultra-high intensities ≥ 1023 W/cm2 can reach even several dozen percent [47]. Such high energy efficiencies of acceleration currently demonstrated in numerical experiments, however, refer to the whole generated ion beam (all accelerated ions), which at the current stage of research has relatively low quality (large angular divergence, wide energy spectrum). The development of methods for high-energy efficient generation of high-quality heavy ion beams is another practically important task requiring a solution.
Laser-driven acceleration of heavy ions is a complex process, the detailed and comprehensive study and reliable description of which by analytical methods is not possible. Progress in the research of this process requires - apart from the development of experimental tools - further intensive development of numerical tools used in these studies. This concerns the development of multidimensional computer codes covering as many physical phenomena relevant to this process as possible (including quantum effects) and increasing computer power to be able to replace the currently commonly used two-dimensional codes with three-dimensional codes. It also seems necessary to increasingly include machine learning in these studies, which can be extremely useful in the search for the optimal set of laser and target parameters to achieve the desired characteristics of the ion beam.
In order to achieve the research goals outlined above, it is necessary to develop the research infrastructure, first of all ultrafast high-peak-power laser drivers. Currently, there are several ultrafast lasers in operation in the world that generate laser pulses with a duration of several dozen fs, peak power in the range of 1-10 PW and energy up to several hundred J [9,10,11,12]. The currently achieved intensities of focused beams of these lasers usually do not exceed 1022 W/cm2 (in one of these lasers a higher intensity of 1023 W/cm2 was measured [12]). However, the potential of these lasers is greater and by improving the quality of the laser beam and its focusing systems, it seems possible to achieve laser intensities of ~ 1023 W/cm2. If the increase in laser pulse intensity was accompanied by an increase in its intensity contrast ratio, which would allow the use of ultrathin targets (< 50 nm thick) in ion acceleration studies, it can be expected that the maximum energies of generated heavy ions could reach several tens of GeV. However, a further increase in the energy of heavy ions, up to the sub-TeV range, requires a new generation of ultrafast lasers, i.e. lasers generating fs laser pulses with a power of ~ 100 PW, energy of ~ several kJ, intensity of ~ 1024 W/cm2 and intensity contrast ratio > 1013. Although advanced projects of such lasers already exist [9,13,14,15], the construction of such research infrastructure will require a great scientific, technological and financial effort and seems possible only in the next decade. As a device intended for fundamental/scientific research, such lasers do not require high repetition rates, and they do not necessarily have to meet other requirements specific to devices used for applications. However, a laser-driven heavy ion accelerator that could compete with conventional accelerators requires an even more complex laser infrastructure, in which a relatively compact laser driver with power ≥ 100 PW and multi-kJ energy operates with a high repetition rate (>> 1 Hz). In addition, such a driver should provide high repeatability and flexibility of parameters and include many other features typical of conventional accelerators generating ion beams for various applications. Rational design and construction of such an accelerator will be possible only after gaining the necessary experience and knowledge from experimental devices currently being designed.
A separate and even more technologically demanding task is to design and build a laser driver generating ion beams for fast ignition of thermonuclear fusion, which - according to current knowledge - should generate laser pulses with a duration of 1 - 10 ps, power ~ 100 PW and energy ~ 100 - 300 kJ. Such lasers require a different technology than femtosecond lasers and it will probably be a technology based in part on the experience of the technology for large high-energy lasers currently used in ICF research.
The development of laser drivers should be accompanied by the development of technology for producing targets used in research on laser acceleration of ions. Although the progress in this technology has been impressive in recent years (see e.g. [60]), new technological solutions that enable optimal adjustment of target characteristics to laser parameters, especially in new ranges of laser intensities and energies following the development of laser drivers, are still desirable. These solutions should expand the range of available target thicknesses, densities and shapes, and also enable the production of complex, multilayer targets, including targets containing nano- or micro-layers with controlled density and spatial structure. Since more and more lasers used for ion acceleration will operate with a high repetition rate, the technology of targets designed for this type of lasers should be developed. In the longer term, this technology should ensure mass and possibly cheap production of such targets.
The development of research on laser acceleration of heavy ions also requires the development of methods and devices for diagnosing various parameters of generated ion beams. In particular, it is necessary to extend the range of measured ion energies (to the range of tens of GeV, and then sub-TeV and perhaps TeV range) and other parameters of the ion beam dependent on this energy. It is also highly desirable to increase the precision of measurements of various beam characteristics such as the ion energy spectrum, ionization spectrum, spatial distribution of ion energy in the beam, etc. In the long term, these diagnostics should enable measurement of parameters of ion beams generated with a high repetition rate.

6. Perspectives for the Application of Laser-Driven Heavy Ion Beams

The development of ultrafast high peak power lasers and the related progress in research on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration opens up the prospect of unique applications of heavy ion beams produced in laser accelerators in various domains. These include, in particular: nuclear and particle physics, high energy density physics, inertial thermonuclear fusion and materials science. Each of the above domains requires different ion beam parameters, the achievement of which requires overcoming different research and technological challenges.

6.1. Nuclear and Particle Physics

Short, pico- or sub-picosecond durations and extremely high intensities and densities of heavy ion beams driven by ultrafast high-peak-power lasers open up the prospect of research in nuclear and particle physics on new time scales and with ion beam-target interaction efficiency unattainable so far. In particular, some low-cross-section and/or transient nuclear reactions difficult to measure using ion beams produced by conventional accelerators could be possible to be studied. An example are the nuclear phenomena planned to be studied within the research program of the ELI-Nuclear Physics laser infrastructure, in which an ultrafast 10 PW laser would be used [107]. The aim of one of the topics in this program is to investigate the production of neutron-rich heavy nuclei by a new reaction mechanism called fission–fusion, using laser-accelerated thorium (232Th) ion beams [107]. These studies are of high importance for nuclear astrophysics and their results could be a significant step towards understanding the nature of the creation of heavy elements in the universe. Experimental investigation of this problem using ion beams produced in conventional accelerators has not been possible so far because the required ion beam parameters were unattainable in these accelerators. In particular, the parameters of the thorium ion beam should be as follows: average ion energy ~ 1.6 GeV, ion number ~ 1011, beam intensity and fluence 1020 W/cm2 and ~ 1018 cm-2, respectively. Numerical studies presented in [88,108] have shown that achieving such parameters is in principle possible with the intensity and power of the multi-fs laser pulse of ~ 1023 W/cm2 and ~ 10 PW, respectively. Such laser pulse parameters are expected to be achieved in the ELI-Nuclear Physics infrastructure, however, to generate a thorium ion beam of sufficiently high quality required for conducting research on the production of neutron-rich heavy nuclei (a beam with a narrow energy spectrum and small angular divergence), a laser driver with higher parameters will probably be needed.
The increase of the energy of heavy ions to the level of ~ 1 GeV/u (i.e. energy ~ 200 GeV for A ~ 200) enables the study of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) effects such as the production of pions and kaons as well as equations of state for nuclear matter [109]. The possibility of producing gold ions of such energy at a laser intensity of ~ 7x1023 W/cm2 was demonstrated in numerical simulations presented in [91]. Achieving such laser intensities seems possible using currently designed next-generation ultrafast lasers with power reaching ~ 100 PW. Further increase of the energy of laser-driven heavy ions up to ~1 TeV would enable a significant extension of QED studies, and in particular the production of a highly exotic state of matter called quark-gluon plasma (QGP). The QGP is a state of matter consisting of an extended volume of interacting quarks, antiquarks, and gluons. Such a state of matter is thought to have existed a few microsecond after the Big Bang. The study of this new state will help to answer some of the key questions of nuclear and particle physics as well as the early evolution of the universe. The ion energy required to produce quark-gluon plasma decreases with an increasing ion mass number [89], so collisions of beams of super-heavy ions of appropriate energy and high intensity/fluence could be an effective source of QGP. Although laser-driven accelerators can potentially deliver heavy ion beams with intensities/fluences several orders of magnitude higher than conventional accelerators, achieving ion energies of ~ 1 TeV is an open question, mainly due to the as yet unexplored influence of the "parasitic" phenomena (see Section 5) on the heavy ion acceleration process.
It can be believed that the development of laser-driven heavy ion accelerators, which in particular will provide an extension of the range of achievable ion energies, will be accompanied by the expansion of research areas in nuclear and particle physics in which laser-generated heavy ion beams can be effectively used.

6.2. High Energy Density Physics

High energy density (HED) state of matter is defined as a state in which the density of energy stored in it is higher than 0.1 MJ/cm3 [110]. The production of HED states and the study of their properties is important for many fields of science, including thermonuclear fusion, astrophysics, planetary science and materials science. Such states of matter can be produced by chemical explosions, lasers, Z-pinch devices and intense particle beams, including heavy ion beams [111,112]. The advantage of the latter is in particular the ability to create HED states basically in any dense material, deep penetration of the material, and usually quite good uniformity of the energy distribution deposited in the material.
The key parameters characterizing the ability of the ion beam to create HED states are the energy deposited per gram of matter [112]: Es = (1.6 × 10−19)(dEi/dx)Fi [J/g] and the deposition power Ps = Es/td, where dEi/dx is the ion stopping power of the material, Fi is the ion fluence, and td is the energy deposition time. The estimates made in [4] showed that when a heavy ion (Pb) beam generated by an ultrafast multi-PW laser with an energy of ~ 200 J interacts with a carbon target, the Es value reaches ~ 1 GJ/g while the value of Ps is above of 1020 W/g. For comparison, the Es and Ps values predicted for heavy ion beams produced by very large RF-driven heavy ion accelerators, such as the FAIR accelerator (GSI, Darmstadt) or the HIAF accelerator (Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou), approach ∼0.1 MJ/g and ∼1012 W/g for FAIR and ∼1 MJ/g and 1013 W/g for HIAF, respectively (assuming an energy deposition time of ∼100 ns) [112]. Thus, the Es and Ps values estimated for a multi-PW laser-driven heavy ion beam are many orders of magnitude higher than those achievable for some of the largest conventional accelerators. It should be emphasized, however, that the volume of matter in which the ion beam energy is deposited will be much smaller in the case of a laser-generated beam than for a beam from a conventional accelerator.
In addition to the very high intensity and density of laser-driven heavy ion beams, another important parameter that largely determines the nature of the beam-target interaction is the very short (ps or sub-ps) beam duration. This causes the time of energy deposition in the target to be much shorter than the period of time in which the target material parameters change due to its hydrodynamic motion. The interaction of the ion beam with the target is therefore isochoric in nature. Such an isochoric regime of beam-target interaction is difficult to achieve in the case of ion beams generated by conventional accelerators due to the long (ns or longer) durations of these beams.
The unique properties of laser-driven heavy ion beams, resulting in the extremely high values of deposited energy Es and power Ps demonstrated in the above examples, as well as very short energy deposition times, open up the prospect of studying new regimes of ion beam interaction with matter, unattainable or barely attainable for conventional accelerators.

6.3. Inertial Confinement Fusion

One of the important potential applications of laser-driven heavy ions is inertial confinement fusion (ICF) in the so-called ion fast ignition (IFI) option (e.g. [97,98,99,100,101]). In this option, nuclear fuel (e.g. DT) compressed to high densities by many multi-ns laser beams or X-rays is ignited by the interaction of a very intense picosecond ion beam with the fuel. Compared to the traditional ICF option, in which fuel ignition is a result of its temperature increase accompanying fuel compression, IFI enables fuel ignition and high energy gain of the fusion system with reduced requirements for the compressed fuel and lower total energy of laser drivers. The ion beam parameters required for fuel ignition are, however, extremely high (see Section 4.2) and at least some of them (beam intensity ~ 1020 W/cm2, ps ion pulse duration) are beyond the capabilities of conventional accelerators. Laser-driven ion accelerators offer the chance to achieve these parameters.
For fuel ignition in the IFI option, both light ions, including protons, and heavy ions can be used. Heavy ion beams have several advantages over light ion beams, in particular (e.g. [48]): (i) the number of ions required for ignition is much smaller than for light ions, (ii) the required ion beam intensities and fluences can be potentially achieved without focusing the beam in the fuel, (iii) heavy ion beams enable higher energy densities to be deposited in the fuel, (iv) they are less sensitive to (parasitic) electric and magnetic fields occurring in the environment of the compressed fuel. On the other hand, achieving the beam parameters desired for fuel ignition requires significantly higher laser intensities for heavy ions than for light ions. This is primarily due to the fact that the ion energies that ensure efficient deposition of the ion beam energy in the fuel increase with the increase in the ion mass.
The ion energies required for IFI in the case of heavy ions with relatively low mass numbers A ~ 50 - 100 are of the order of 5 - 10 GeV, so they are achievable with laser driver parameters similar to those predicted for already constructed multi-PW lasers such as ELI-NP. These lasers are also capable of generating ion beams with ps durations. Therefore, some issues related to IFI can be experimentally studied in the coming years using existing or emerging ultrafast high-peak-power lasers. However, full-scale ICF research in the IFI scenario using heavy ion beams with parameters enabling ignition of nuclear fuel requires, according to current knowledge, picosecond lasers with energies of ~ 100 - 300 kJ (see Section 4.2), i.e. with energies 2 - 3 orders of magnitude higher than the energies of ultrafast lasers operating today. The prospect of building such lasers is difficult to determine at present, because it depends not only on technological capabilities but also on political decisions. Regardless of this, it can be assumed that the expanding range of other applications of laser-generated heavy ion beams and the increase in power and energy of next-generation ultrafast lasers will stimulate continuous development of research on the use of these beams in ICF.

6.4. Materials Science and Technology

Laser-driven heavy ions can also find applications in some areas of materials science. One of them is the implantation of ions in near-surface layers of various materials (e.g. [113,114,115]) in order to modify and/or improve the properties of these layers. The main advantage of laser ion sources for implantation over traditional sources (e.g. small conventional accelerators) is the ability to produce ions of virtually any element, as well as the ease of changing one type of ion for another (simply by changing the target). The ion energies required in this application depend on the type of material being implanted and the thickness of the layer in which the ions are to be implanted. Usually, the required energies are not very high and range widely, from several tens of keV to several tens of MeV. Such heavy ion energies are achievable using long-pulse lasers. Energies below 1 MeV can be obtained using commercial lasers with energy ≤ 1J, which can operate with a high repetition rate (~ 10 Hz or higher). Multi-MeV heavy ion energies require much higher energies of long-pulse lasers, usually ~ 10 - 100 J, which most often operate with a very low repetition rate (<< 1 Hz). Another parameter of the ion beam that determines its usefulness in ion implantation is the number of ions in the beam. Long-pulse lasers usually produce a much larger number of ions than ultrafast lasers with similar laser energy, which is, on the one hand, a result of the larger volume of plasma generated by the former (due to their much larger laser focal spot size on the target), and on the other hand, a longer time of ion production in one shot (longer laser-target interaction time). For this reason, in the case of implantation of ions with low energies (several dozen - several hundred keV), long-pulse lasers are much more efficient than ultrafast ones, especially since such ion energies can be achieved using relatively cheap commercial nanosecond lasers operating with a high repetition rate. However, when it comes to implantation of heavy ions with energies of ~ 10 - 100 MeV, the production of which by long-pulse lasers requires high laser energies that make it impossible to work with a high repetition rate, ultrafast lasers can be more efficient for ion implantation than the long-pulse ones. This is primarily due to the fact that such heavy ion energies can be achieved using ultrafast laser drivers with relatively low energies (~ 1 - 10 J), which allow them to work with a high repetition rate. For this reason, the total number of ions implanted in the material per unit time can be orders of magnitude higher than in the case of using a long-pulse laser driver for implantation. However, in order for a laser source of heavy ions driven by an ultrafast laser to become practically useful and competitive with traditional sources, significant effort is needed towards (at least): improving the spatial homogeneity of the ion beam, minimizing the beam angular divergence, controlling the energy spectrum of the ions, increasing the repetition rate, ensuring a small scatter and stability of the beam parameters.
Laser-driven heavy ion beams can also be useful in other areas of materials science. In particular, they can advance research on the behaviour of materials under extreme pressure and/or temperature generated in the material by an ion beam, the study of phase transitions in the material, and others.

7. Summary and Conclusions

Laser-driven ion acceleration is a new, rapidly developing field of research and one of the important applications of ultrafast high-peak-power lasers and laser-produced plasma. In this acceleration method, strong electric fields with strengths reaching tens and hundreds of GV/cm, induced by an ultrafast laser in the plasma generated by the laser-target interaction, enable the acceleration of ions to relativistic velocities on picosecond time scales and at sub-millimetre distances. Using this method, both light and heavy ions can be accelerated, but the latter require much higher laser intensities due to their higher mass, as well as other properties different from those of light ions. For this reason, the development of research on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration and the achieved parameters of heavy ion beams are strongly coupled with the development of ultrafast high-peak-power lasers, primarily with the increase in their peak power and laser beam intensity. The increase in the peak power of ultrafast lasers from the TW level to the PW level observed in the last two decades and the accompanying increase in laser intensity by several orders of magnitude, up to the level of 1022 W/cm2, resulted in the increase in the energy of accelerated heavy ions from ~ 1 MeV to ~ 1 GeV, as well as a significant increase in other ion beam parameters such as beam intensity and fluence or the number of generated multi-charge high-energy ions. Further increase of ion beam parameters, including increase of ion energy to multi-GeV level is possible using currently operating multi-PW lasers, such as ultrafast ELI lasers, provided that intensity of laser beams generated by them increases to ~ 1023 W/cm2. Production of heavy ion beams with ion energies of tens and hundreds of GeV, i.e. energies comparable to those achieved in large heavy ion accelerators, requires next-generation ultrafast laser drivers (currently designed) with peak power ~ 100 PW and laser intensity reaching 1024 W/cm2.
Laser-driven heavy ion beams - especially those produced at ultra-high laser intensities (~1023 W/cm2 or higher) - have a number of unique properties unattainable for beams produced in conventional RF-driven accelerators. These include extremely high beam intensities, densities and fluences and very short, pico- or sub-picosecond ion pulse durations. This creates the prospect of using these beams to explore new areas of research in nuclear and particle physics and high energy-density physics, as well as in other fields of research, e.g. inertial confinement fusion. However, many challenges must be overcome to make this prospect a reality. These include: (1) increase in ion energy to sub-TeV and possibly TeV levels (important primarily for applications in nuclear and particle physics); (2) energy-efficient control of the ion energy spectrum and its narrowing; (3) control of the beam ionization spectrum, enabling the generation of mono-charge beams for a wide range of ion mass numbers; (4) minimization of the ion beam angular divergence; (5) increase in the energy efficiency of the generation of high-quality (mono-charge, quasi-monoenergetic, low-divergence) ion beams.
To overcome these challenges, further intensive development of experimental, theoretical and numerical studies of laser-driven heavy ion acceleration is necessary, especially in the range of ultra-high laser intensities ~ 1023 - 1024 W/cm2, which seem to be possible to achieve with the next generation of ultrafast high-peak-power lasers.

Author Contributions

Jan Badziak: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Writing-original draft (lead). Jarosław Domański: Formal analysis (equal); Software (lead); Visualization (lead). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been carried out, in part, within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No. 101052200—EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. This scientific work was also supported by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the programme called “PMW” for 2022 under the Contract No 5246/HEU-Euratom/2022/2. The simulations were carried out with the support of the Interdisciplinary Center for Mathematical and Computational Modelling (ICM), University of Warsaw under Grant No. G83-16, and the Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Centre under Grant No. 417 and pl0111-01.

Data Availability Statement

The data supported the findings of study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

  1. Daido, H.; Nishiuchi, M.; Pirozhkov, A. S. Review of laser driven ion sources and their applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2012, 75, 056401.
  2. Macchi, A.; Borghesi, M.; Passoni, M. Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013, 85, 751.
  3. Badziak, J. Laser-driven ion acceleration: methods, challenges and prospects. J. Phys. Conf. Series 2018, 959, 012001.
  4. Badziak, J.; Domanski, J. Towards ultra-intense ultra-short ion beams driven by a multi-PW laser. Laser Part. Beams 2019, 37, 288.
  5. Linlor, W. I. Ion energies produced by laser giant pulse. Appl. Phys. Lett.1963, 3, 210-212.
  6. Badziak, J. Laser-driven generation of fast particles. Opto-Electron. Rev. 2007, 15, 1.
  7. Laska, L.; Jungwirth, K.; Kralikova, B.; Krasa, J.; Pfeifer, M.; Rohlena, K.; Skala, J.; Ullschmied, J.; Badziak, J.; Parys, P.; et al. Generation of multiply charged ions at low and high laser-power densities. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2003, 45, 585.
  8. Laska, L.; Jungwirth, K.; Krasa, J.; Krousky, E.; Pfeifer, M.; Rohlena, K.; Velyhan, A.; Ullschmied, J.; Gammino, S.; Torrisi, L.; et al. Angular distributions of ions emitted from laser plasma produced at various irradiation angles and laser intensities. Laser Part. Beams 2008, 26, 555–565.
  9. Danson, C. N.; Haefner, C.; Bromage, J.; Butcher, T.; Chanteloup, J.-C. F.; Chowdhury, E. A.; Galvanauskas, A.; Gizzi, L. A.; Hein, J.; Hillier, D. I.; et al. Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide. High Power Laser Science and Engineering 2019, 7, e54.
  10. Radier, Ch.; Chalus, O.; Charbonneau, M.; Thambirajah, Sh.; Deschamps, G.; David, S.; Barbe, J.; Etter, E.; Matras, G.; Ricaud S.; et al. 10 PW peak power femtosecond laser pulse at ELI-NP. High Power Laser Science and Engineering 2022, 10, e21.
  11. Wang, P.; Gong, Z.; Lee, S. G.; Shou, Y.; Geng, Y.; Jeon, C.; Kim, I J.; Lee, H. W.; Yoon, J. W.; Sung, J. H.; et al. Super-Heavy Ions Acceleration Driven by Ultrashort Laser Pulses at Ultrahigh Intensity. Phys. Rev. X 2021, 11, 021049.
  12. Yoon, J. W.; Kim, Y. G.; Choi, Il W.; Sung, J. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, S. Ku; Nam, Ch. H. Realization of laser intensity over 1023 W/cm2. Optica 2021, 8, 630.
  13. Mourou, G. Nobel Lecture: Extreme light physics and application. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019, 91, 030501.
  14. Khazanov, E.; Shaykin, A.; Kostyukov, I.; Ginzburg, V.; Mukhin, I.; Yakovlev, I.; Soloviev, A.; Kuznetsov, I.; Mironov, S.; Korzhimanov, A.; et al. Exawatt Center for Extreme Light Studies (XCELS). High Power Laser Science and Engineering 2023, 11, e78.
  15. Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, X.; Chen, J.; Long, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Bai, P.; Li, Y.; et al. 13.4fs, 0.1 Hz OPCPA Front End for the 100PW-Class Laser Facility. Ultrafast Sci. 2022, 2022, 9894358.
  16. Karasik, M.; Weaver, J. L.; Aglitskiy, Y.; Watari, T.; Arikawa, Y.; Sakaiya, T.; Oh, J.; Velikovich, A. L.; Zalesak S. T.; Bates, J. W.; et al. Acceleration to high velocities and heating by impact using Nike KrF laser. Phys. Plasmas 2010, 17, 056317.
  17. Badziak, J.; Borodziuk, S.; Pisarczyk, T.; Chodukowski, T.; Krousky, E.; Masek, K.; Skala, J.; Ullschmied, J.; Rhee, Y.-J. Highly efficient acceleration and collimation of high-density plasma using laser-induced cavity pressure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 251502.
  18. Badziak, J.; Jabłoński, S.; Pisarczyk, T.; Rączka, P.; Krousky, E.; Liska, R.; Kucharik, M.; Chodukowski, T.; Kalinowska, Z.; Parys, P.; et al. Highly efficient accelerator of dense matter using laser-induced cavity pressure acceleration. Phys. Plasmas 2012, 19, 053105.
  19. Shui, M.; Chu, G.; Zhu, B.; He, W.; Xi, T.; Fan, W.; Xin, J.; Gu, Y. Hypervelocity launching of flyers at the SG-III prototype laser facility. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 035903.
  20. Atzeni, S.; Meyer-ter-Vehn, J. The Physics of Inertial Fusion; Publisher: Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 2004.
  21. Wilks, S. C.; Langdon, A. B.; Cowan, T. E.; Roth, M.; Singh, M.; Hatchett, S.; Key, M. H.; Pennington, D.; McKinnon, A.; Snavely, R.A. Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser-solid interactions. Phys. Plasmas 2001, 8, 542.
  22. Mackinnon, A. J.; Borghesi, M.; Hatchett, S.; Key, M. H.; Patel, P. K.; Campbell, H.; Schiavi, A.; Snavely, R.; Wilks, S. C.; Willi, O. Effect of Plasma Scale Length on Multi-MeV Proton Production by Intense Laser Pulse. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 1769.
  23. Badziak, J.; Woryna, E.; Parys, P.; Platonov, K. Yu.; Jabłoński, S.; Ryć, L.; Vankov, A. B.; Wołowski, J. Fast Proton Generation from Ultrashort Laser Pulse with Double-Layer Foil Targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 215001.
  24. Mackinnon, A. J.; Sentoku, Y.; Patel, P. K.; Price, D. W.; Hatchett, S.; Key, M. H.; Andersen, C.; Snavely, R.; Freeman, R.R. Enhancement of Proton Acceleration by Hot-Electron Recirculation in Thin Foils Irradiated by Ultraintense Laser Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 215006.
  25. Borghesi, M.; Mackinnon, A. J.; Campbell, D. H.; Hicks, D. G.; Kar, S.; Patel, P. K.; Price, D.; Romagnani, L.; Schiavi, A.; Willi, O. Multi-MeV Proton Source Investigations in Ultraintense Laser-Foil Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 055003.
  26. Cowan, T. E.; Fuchs, J.; Ruhl, H.; Kemp, A.; Audebert, P.; Roth, M.; Stephens, R.; Barton, I.; Blazevic, A.; Brambrink, E.; et al. Ultralow Emittance, Multi-MeV Proton Beams from a Laser Virtual-Cathode Plasma Accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 204801.
  27. Allen, M.; Patel, P. K.; Mackinnon, A.; Price, D.; Wilks, S.; Morse, E. Direct Experimental Evidence of Back-Surface Ion Acceleration from Laser-Irradiated Gold Foils. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 265004.
  28. Esirkepov, T.; Borghesi, M.; Bulanov, S. V.; Mourou, G.; Tajima, T. Highly Efficient Relativistic-Ion Generation in the Laser-Piston Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 175003.
  29. Macchi, A.; Cattani, F.; Liseykina, T. V.; Cornalti, F. Laser Acceleration of Ion Bunches at the Front Surface of Overdense Plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 165003.
  30. Robinson, A. P. L.; Zepf, M.; Kar, S.; Evans, R. G.; Bellei, C. Radiation pressure acceleration of thin foils with circularly polarized laser pulses. New J. Phys. 2008, 10, 013021.
  31. Liseykina, T. V.; Borghesi, M.; Macchi, A.; Tuveri, S. Radiation pressure acceleration by ultraintense laser pulses. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2008, 50, 124033.
  32. Klimo, O.; Psikal, J.; Limpouch, J.; Tikhonchuk, V. T. Monoenergetic ion beams from ultrathin foils irradiated by ultrahigh-contrast circularly polarized laser pulses. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2008, 11, 031301.
  33. Grech, M.; Skupin, S.; Diaw, A.; Schlegel, T.; Tikhonchuk, V. T. Energy dispersion in radiation pressure accelerated ion beams. New J. Phys. 2011, 13, 123003.
  34. Badziak, J.; Głowacz, S.; Jabłoński, S.; Parys, P.; Wołowski, J.; Hora, H. Generation of picosecond high-density ion fluxes by skin-layer laser-plasma interaction. Laser Part. Beams 2005, 23, 143.
  35. Głowacz, S.; Hora, H.; Badziak, J.; Jabłoński, S.; Cang, Y.; Osman, F. Analytical description of rippling effect and ion acceleration in plasma produced by a short laser pulse. Laser. Part. Beams 2006, 24, 15-25.
  36. Badziak, J.; Jabłoński, S.; Parys, P.; Rosiński, M.; Wołowski, J.; Szydłowski, A.; Antici, P.; Fuchs, J.; Mancic, A. Ultraintense proton beams from laser-induced skin-layer ponderomotive acceleration. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 063310.
  37. Silva, L. O.; Marti, M.; Davies, J. R.; Fonseca, R. A. Proton shock acceleration in laser-plasma interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 015002.
  38. Esirkepov, T.; Bingham, R.; Bulanov, S.; Honda, T.; Nishihara, K.; Pegoraro, F. Coulomb explosion of a cluster irradiated by a high intensity laser pulse. Laser Part. Beams 2000, 18, 503.
  39. Bychenkov, V. Yu.; Kovaliev, V. F. Coulomb explosion in a cluster plasma. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2005, 31, 178-183.
  40. Yin, L.; Albright, B. J.; Hegelich, B. M.; Fernandez, J. C. GeV laser ion acceleration from ultrathin targets: the laser breakout afterburner. Laser Part. Beams 2006, 24, 291-298.
  41. Yin, L.; Albright, B. J.; Hegelich, B. M.; Browers, K. J.; Flippo, K. A.; Kwan, T. J. T.; Fernandez, J. C. Monoenergetic and GeV ion acceleration from the laser breakout afterburner using ultrathin targets. Phys. Plasmas 2007, 14, 056706.
  42. Nakamura, T.; Bulanov, S. V.; Esirkepov, T. Zh.; Kando, M. High-Energy Ions from Near-Critical Density Plasmas via Magnetic Vortex Acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 135002.
  43. Park, J.; Bulanov, S. S.; Bin, J.; Ji, Q.; Steinke, S.; Vay, J.-L.; Geddes, C. G. R.; Schroeder, C. B.; Leemans, W. P.; Schenkel, T.; et al. Ion acceleration in laser generated megatesla magnetic vortex. Phys. Plasmas 2019, 26, 103108.
  44. Jung, D.; Yin, L.; Albright, B. J.; Gautier, D. C.; Hörlein, R.; Kiefer, D.; Henig, A.; Johnson, R.; Letzring, S.; Palaniyappan, S.; et al. Monoenergetic Ion Beam Generation by Driving Ion Solitary Waves with Circularly Polarized Laser Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 115002.
  45. Yin, L.; Albright, B. J.; Jung, D.; Bowers, K. J.; Shah, R. C.; Palaniyappan, S.; Fernández, J. C.; Hegelich, B. M. Mono-energetic ion beam acceleration in solitary waves during relativistic transparency using high-contrast circularly polarized short-pulse laser and nanoscale targets. Phys. Plasmas 2011, 18, 053103.
  46. Domański, J.; Badziak, J. Towards single-charge heavy ion beams driven by an ultra-intense laser. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2022, 64, 085002.
  47. Domański, J.; Badziak, J. Super-heavy ion beams generated by a multi-PW femtosecond laser. Phys. Plasmas 2024, 31, 023110.
  48. Badziak, J.; Domański, J. In search of ways to improve the properties of a laser-accelerated heavy ion beam relevant for fusion fast ignition. Phys. Plasmas 2023, 30, 053107.
  49. Hora, H. Physics of Laser Driven Plasmas; Publisher: Wiley, New York, USA, 1981.
  50. Eliezer, S.; Nissim, N.; Martinez Val, J. M.; Mima, K.; Hora, H. Double layer acceleration by laser radiation. Laser Part. Beams 2014, 32, 211.
  51. Roth, M.; Blazevic, A.; Geissel, M.; Schlegel, T.; Cowan, T. E.; Allen, M.; Gauthier, J.-C.; Audebert, P.; Fuchs, J.; Meyer-ter-Vehn, J.; et al. Energetic ions generated by laser pulses: A detailed study on target properties. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2002, 5, 0613001.
  52. Snavely, R. A.; Key, M. H.; Hatchett, S. P.; Cowan, T. E.; Roth, M.; Philips, T. W.; Stoyer, M. A.; Henry, E. A.; Sangster, T. C.; Singh, M. S.; et al. Intense High-Energy Proton Beams from Petawatt-Laser Irradiation of Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 2945.
  53. Brenner, C. M.; Robinson, A. P. L.; Markey, K.; Scott, R. H. H.; Gray, R. J.; Rosiński, M.; Deppert, O.; Badziak, J.; Batani, D.; Davies, J. R.; et. al. High energy conversion efficiency in laser-proton acceleration by controlling laser-energy deposition onto thin foil targets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 081123.
  54. Petrov, M.; Willingale, L.; Davis, J.; Petrova, Tz.; Maksimchuk, A.; Krushelnick, K. The impact of contaminants on laser-driven light ion acceleration. Phys. Plasmas 2010, 17, 103111.
  55. Petrov, M.; McGuffey, C.; Thomas, A. G. R.; Krushelnick, K.; Beg, F. N. Generation of heavy ion beams using femtosecond laser pulses in the target normal sheath acceleration and radiation pressure acceleration regimes. Phys. Plasmas 2016, 23, 063108.
  56. Domański, J.; Badziak, J. Properties of heavy ion beams produced by a PW sub-picosecond laser. J. Instrum. 2020, 15, C05037.
  57. Laska, L.; Badziak, J.; Gammino, S.; Jungwirth, K.; Kasperczuk, A.; Krasa, J.; Krousky, E.; Kubes, P.; Parys, P.; Pfeifer, M.; et al. The influence of an intense laser beam interaction with preformed plasma on the characteristics of emitted ion streams. Laser Part. Beams 2007, 25, 549 .
  58. Torrisi, L.; Cutroneo, M.; Andò L.; Ullschmied, J. Thomson parabola spectrometry for gold laser-generated plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 2013, 20, 023106.
  59. Badziak, J.; Kasperczuk, A.; Parys, P.; Pisarczyk, T.; Rosiński, M.; Ryć, L.; Wołowski, J.; Jabłoński, S.; Suchańska, R.; Krousky, E.; et al. Production of high-current heavy ion jets at the short-wavelength subnanosecond laser-solid interaction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 081502.
  60. Prencipe, I.; Fuchs, J.; Pascarelli, S.; Schumacher, D. W.; Stephens, R. B.; Alexander, N. B.; Briggs, R.; Büscher, M.; Cernaianu, M. O.; Choukourov, A.; et al. Targets for high repetition rate laser facilities: needs, challenges and perspectives. High Power Laser Science and Engineering 2017, 5, e17.
  61. Badziak, J.; Makowski, J.; Parys, P.; Ryć, L.; Wołowski J.; Woryna, E.; Vankov, A. B. Intensity-dependent characteristics of a picosecond laser-produced Cu plasma. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2001, 34, 1885.
  62. Badziak, J.; Makowski, J.; Parys, P.; Wołowski, J.; Woryna, E.; Vankov, A. B. Generation of streams of highly charged Ag ions by picosecond laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 1823.
  63. Badziak, J.; Parys, P.; Vankov, A. B.; Wołowski, J.; Woryna, E. Generation of fluxes of highly charged ions from a picosecond laser-produced plasma. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 21.
  64. Badziak, J.; Hora, H.; Woryna, E.; Jabłoński, S.; Laska, L.; Parys, P.; Rohlena, K.; Wołowski, J. Experimental evidence of differences in properties of fast ion fluxes from short-pulse and long-pulse laser-plasma interactions. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 315, 452.
  65. Clark, E. L.; Krushelnick, K.; Zepf, M.; Beg, F. N.; Tatarakis, M.; Machacek, A.; Santala, M. I. K.; Watts, I.; Norreys, P. A.; Dangor, A. E. Energetic heavy-ion and proton generation from ultraintense laser-plasma interactions with solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 1654.
  66. McKenna, P.; Ledingham, K. W. D.; Yang, J. M.; Robson, L.; McCanny, T.; Shimizu, S.; Clarke, R. J.; Neely, D.; Spohr, K.; Chapman, R.; et al. Characterization of proton and heavier ion acceleration in ultrahigh-intensity laser interactions with heated target foils. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 036405.
  67. McKenna, P.; Lindau, F.; Lundh, O.; Carroll, D. C.; Clarke, R. J.; Ledingham, K. W. D.; McCanny, T.; Neely, D.; Robinson, A. P. L.; Robson, L.; et al. Low- and medium-mass ion acceleration driven by petawatt laser plasma interactions. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2007, 49, B223–B231.
  68. Tayyab, M.; Bagchi, S.; Chakera, J. A.; Avasthi, D. K.; Ramis, R.; Upadhyay, A.; Ramakrishna, B.; Mandal, T.; Naik, P. A. Mono-energetic heavy ion acceleration from laser plasma based composite nano-accelerator. Phys. Plasmas 2018, 25, 123102.
  69. Bagchi, S.; Tayyab, M.; Pasley, J.; Robinson, A. P. L.; Nayak, M.; Chakera, J. A. Quasi mono-energetic heavy ion acceleration from layered targets. Phys. Plasmas 2021, 28, 023108.
  70. Nishiuchi, M.; Sakaki, H.; Esirkepov, T. Zh.; Nishio, K.; Pikuz, T. A.; Faenov, A. Ya.; Skobelev, I. Yu.; Orlandi, R.; Sako, H.; Pirozhkov, A. S.; et al. Acceleration of highly charged GeV Fe ions from a low-Z substrate by intense femtosecond laser. Phys. Plasmas 2015, 22, 033107.
  71. Braenzel, J.; Andreev, A. A.; Platonov, K.; Klingsporn, M.; Ehrentraut, L.; Sandner, W.; Schnurer, M. Coulomb-Driven Energy Boost of Heavy Ions for Laser-Plasma Acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 124801.
  72. Lindner, F. H.; McCary, E.; Jiao, X.; Ostermayr, T. M.; Roycroft, R.; Tiwari, G.; Hegelich, B. M.; Schreiber, J.; Thirolf, P. G. En-route to the fission–fusion reaction mechanism: a status update on laser-driven heavy ion acceleration. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2019, 61, 055002.
  73. Nishiuchi, M.; Dover, N. P.; Hata, M.; Sakaki, H.; Kondo, Ko.; Lowe , H. F.; Miyahara, T.; Kiriyama, H.; Koga , J. K.; Iwata, N.; et al. Dynamics of laser-driven heavy-ion acceleration clarified by ion charge states. Phys. Rev. Research 2020, 2, 033081.
  74. Hollinger, R.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Moreau, A.; Capeluto, M. G.; Song, H.; Rockwood, A.; Bayarsaikhan, E.; Kaymak, V.; Pukhov, A.; et al. Extreme ionization of heavy atoms in solid-density plasmas by relativistic second-harmonic laser pulses. Nature Photonics 2020, 14, 607.
  75. Lindner, F. H.; Fitzpatrick, E. G.; Haffa, D.; Ponnath, L.; Schmidt, A.-K.; Speicher, M.; Zielbauer, B.; Schreiber, J.; Thirolf, P. G. Charge-state resolved laser acceleration of gold ions to beyond 7 MeV/u. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4784.
  76. Doria, D.; Martin, P.; Ahmed, H.; Alejo, A.; Cerchez, M.; Ferguson, S.; Fernandez-Tobias, J.; Green, J. S.; Gwynne, D.; Hanton, F.; et al. Calibration of BAS-TR image plate response to GeV gold ions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2022, 93, 033304.
  77. Martin, P.; Ahmed, H.; Doria, D.; Cerchez, M.; Hanton, F.; Gwynne, D.; Alejo, A.; Fernández-Tobías, J.; Green, J.; Macchi, A.; et al. Narrow-band acceleration of gold ions to GeV energies from ultra-thin foils. Communications Physics 2024, 7, 3.
  78. Korzhimanov, A. V.; Efimenko, E. S.; Golubev, S. V.; Kim, A. V. Generating High-Energy Highly Charged Ion Beams from Petawatt-Class Laser Interactions with Compound Targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 245008.
  79. Wu, D.; Qiao, B.; McGuffey, C.; He, X. T.; Beg, F. N. Generation of high-energy mono-energetic heavy ion beams by radiation pressure acceleration of ultra-intense laser pulses. Phys. Plasmas 2014, 21, 123118.
  80. Wang, H. Y.; Lin, C.; Liu, B.; Sheng, Z. M.; Lu, H. Y.; Ma, W. J.; Bin, J. H.; Schreiber, J.; He, X. T.; Chen, J. E.; et al. Laser-driven three-stage heavy-ion acceleration from relativistic laser-plasma interaction. Phys. Rev. E 2014, 89, 013107.
  81. Petrov, G. M.; McGuffey, C.; Thomas, A. G. R.; Krushelnick, K.; Beg, F. N. Heavy ion acceleration in the radiation pressure acceleration and breakout afterburner regimes. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2017, 59, 075003.
  82. Shen, X. F.; Qiao, B.; Zhang, H.; Kar, S.; Zhou, C. T.; Chang, H. X.; Borghesi, M.; He, X. T. Achieving Stable Radiation Pressure Acceleration of Heavy Ions via Successive Electron Replenishment from Ionization of a High-Z Material Coating. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 204802.
  83. Li, J.; Arefiev, A. V.; Bulanov, S. S.; Kawahito, D.; Bailly-Grandvaux, M.; Petrov, G. M.; McGuffey, C.; Beg, F. N. Ionization injection of highly-charged copper ions for laser driven acceleration from ultra-thin foils. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 666.
  84. Kawahito, D.; Kishimoto, Y. Ionization and acceleration of multiply charged gold ions in solid film irradiated by high intensity laser. Phys. Plasmas 2020, 27, 033108.
  85. Afshari, M.; Morris, S.; Geulig, L. D.; Chitgar, Z. M.; Gibbon, P.; Thirolf, P. G.; Schreiber, J. The role of collisional ionization in heavy ion acceleration by high intensity laser pulses. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12,18260.
  86. Mehrangiz, M. Application of encapsulated hollow gold nanocluster targets for high-quality and quasi-monoenergetic ions generation. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2022, 64, 035007.
  87. Wu, D.; Qiao, B.; He, X. T. The radiation reaction effects in the ultra-intense and ultra-short laser foil interaction regime. Phys. Plasmas 2015, 22, 093108.
  88. Domański, J.; Badziak, J. Ultra-intense femtosecond super-heavy ion beams driven by a multi-PW laser. Phys. Lett. A 2018, 382, 3412.
  89. Zhao, N.; Zou, D. B.; Jiang, X. R.; Yu, T. P.; Yu, M. Y.; Liu, K.; Huang, T. W.; Zhang, H.; Wu, S. Z.; Hu, L. X.; et al. Hundreds-GeV Au ion generation by 1022-24 W cm-2 laser pulses interacting with high-Z grain doped gas. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2021, 63, 035009.
  90. Zou, D.; Yu, M.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, N.; Yu, T.; Zhuo, H.; Pukhov, A.; Ma, Y.; Shao, F.; Zhou, C.; et al. Highly Efficient Heavy Ion Acceleration from Laser Interaction with Dusty Plasma. Adv. Photonics Res. 2021, 2, 2000181.
  91. Zhao, N.; Gan, L.; Liu, K.; Zou, D.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, W.; Zhuo, H. Quasi monoenergetic heavy ion acceleration driven by sub-100 PW linearly polarized laser pulses in the radiation-dominated QED regime. Phys. Plasmas 2024, 31, 033103.
  92. Tamburini, M.; Pegoraro, F.; Di Piazza, A.; Keitel, C. H.; Macchi, A. Radiation reaction effects on radiation pressure acceleration. New. J. Phys. 2010, 12,123005.
  93. Ridgers, C. P.; Brady, C. S.; Duclous, R.; Kirk, J. G.; Bennett, K.; Arber, T. D.; Robinson, A. P. L.; Bell, A. R. Dense electron-positron plasmas and ultraintense γ rays from laser-irradiated solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 165006.
  94. Brady, C. S.; Ridges, C. P.; Arber, T. D.; Bell, A. R. Synchrotron radiation, pair production, and longitudinal electron motion during 10-100 PW laser solid interaction. Phys. Plasmas 2014, 21, 033108.
  95. Capdessus, R.; McKenna, P. Influence of radiation force on ultraintense laser-driven ion acceleration. Phys. Rev. E 2015, 91, 053105.
  96. Domański, J.; Badziak, J. Generation of ion beams from a high-Z target irradiated by a laser pulse of ultra-relativistic intensity. Acta Phys. Polon. A 2020, 138, 586.
  97. Roth, M.; Cowan, T. E.; Key, M. H.; Hatchett, S. P.; Brown, C.; Fountain, W.; Johnson, J.; Pennington, D. M.; Snavely, R. A.; Wilks S. C.; et.al. Fast ignition by intense laser-accelerated proton beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 436.
  98. Key, M. H. Status of and prospects for the fast ignition inertial fusion concept. Phys. Plasmas 2007,14, 055502.
  99. Badziak, J.; Jabłoński, S.; Wołowski, J. Progress and prospect of fast ignition of ICF targets. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2007, 49, B651.
  100. Fernandez, J. C.; Albright, B. J.; Beg, F. N.; Foord, M. E.; Hegelich, B. M.; Honrubia, J. J.; Roth, M.; Stephens, R. B.; Yin, L. Fast ignition with laser-driven proton and ion beams. Nucl. Fusion 2014, 54, 054006.
  101. Badziak, J.; Domański, J. Laser-driven acceleration of ion beams for high-gain inertial confinement fusion. Nucl. Fusion 2021, 61, 046011.
  102. Honrubia, J. J.; Fernandez, J. C.; Hegelich, B. M.; Murakami, M.; Enriquez, C. D. Fast ignition driven by quasi-monoenergetic ions: Optimal ion type and reduction of ignition energies with an ion beam array. Laser Part. Beams 2014, 32, 419.
  103. Bulanov, S. S.; Esarey, E.; Schroeder, C. B.; Bulanov, S. V.; Esirkepov, T. Zh.; Kando, M.; Pegoraro, F.; Leemans, W. P. Radiation pressure acceleration: The factors limiting maximum attainable ion energy. Phys. Plasmas 2016, 23, 056703.
  104. Jain, S.; Soni, K. K.; Jaiman, N. K.; Maheshwari, K. P. Effect of Laser Group Velocity on Maximum Attainable Ion Energy in the Radiation Pressure Dominant (RPD) Regime. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2021, 49, no. 3, 1253-1258.
  105. Di Piazza, A.; Müller, C.; Hatsagortsyan, K. Z.; Keitel, C. H. Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 1177.
  106. Gonoskov, A.; Blackburn, T. G.; Marklund, M. Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2022, 94, 045001.
  107. Negoita, F.; Roth, M.; Thirolf, P. G.; Tudisco, S.; Hannachi, F.; Moustaizis, S.; Pomerantz, I.; McKenna, P.; Fuchs, J.; Sphor, K.; et al. Laser driven nuclear physics at ELI_NP. Romanian Reports in Physics 2016, 68, Supplement, S37-S144.
  108. Domański, J.; Badziak, J.; Marchwiany, M. Laser-driven acceleration of heavy ions at ultra-relativistic laser intensity. Laser. Part. Beams 2018, 36, 507.
  109. Sturm, C.; Böttcher, I.; Dȩbowski, M.; Förster, A.; Grosse, E.; Koczoń, P.; Kohlmeyer, B.; Laue, F.; Mang, M.; Naumann, L.; et al. Evidence for a Soft Nuclear Equation-of-State from Kaon Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 39.
  110. Drake, R. P. High-Energy-Density Physics; Publisher: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Hidelberg, Germany, 2006.
  111. Hoffmann, D. H. H.; Fortov, V. E.; Kuster, M.; Mintsev, V.; Sharkov, B. Y.; Tahir, N. A.; Udrea, S.; Varentsov, D.; Weyrich, K. High energy density physics generated by intense heavy ion beams. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2009, 322, 167.
  112. Sharkov, B. Yu.; Hoffmann, D. H. H.; Golubev, A. A.; Zhao, Y. High energy density physics with intense ion beams. Matter Radiat. Extremes 2016, 1, 28.
  113. Boody, F. P.; Hopel, R.; Hora, H.; Kelly, J. C. Laser-driven ion source for reduced-cost implantation of metal ions for strong reduction of dry friction and increased durability. Laser Part. Beams 1996, 14, 443–8.
  114. Torrisi, L.; Gammino, S.; Mezzasalma, A. M.; Badziak, J.; Parys, P.; Wołowski, J.; Woryna, E.; Krasa, J.; Laska, L.; Pfeifer, M.; et al. Implantation of ions produced by the use of high power iodine laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003, 217, 319-331.
  115. Wołowski, J.; Badziak, J.; Czarnecka, A.; Parys, P.; Pisarek, M.; Rosiński M.; Turan, R.; Yerci, S. Application of pulsed laser deposition and laser-induced ion implantation for formation of semiconductor nano-crystallites. Laser Part. Beams 2007, 25, 65-69.
Figure 2.1. The idea of ion acceleration by the RPA mechanism. Fp - ponderomotive force; E, H - strength of the electric and magnetic field (respectively) of the laser beam in the plasma; ne - electron density in the plasma, nec - critical electron density, xc - position of the critical density surface.
Figure 2.1. The idea of ion acceleration by the RPA mechanism. Fp - ponderomotive force; E, H - strength of the electric and magnetic field (respectively) of the laser beam in the plasma; ne - electron density in the plasma, nec - critical electron density, xc - position of the critical density surface.
Preprints 146812 g001
Figure 2.2. The idea of ion acceleration by the TNSA mechanism (see the text).
Figure 2.2. The idea of ion acceleration by the TNSA mechanism (see the text).
Preprints 146812 g002
Figure 3.1. The maximum ion charge state, Zmax, measured in [63] as a function of the ion atomic number Za. IL = 5x1016 W/cm2, EL = 0.45 J, τL = 1 ps.
Figure 3.1. The maximum ion charge state, Zmax, measured in [63] as a function of the ion atomic number Za. IL = 5x1016 W/cm2, EL = 0.45 J, τL = 1 ps.
Preprints 146812 g003
Figure 4.1. The ionization spectra of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions in the final stage of ion acceleration. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.1. The ionization spectra of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions in the final stage of ion acceleration. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g004
Figure 4.2. 2D spatial distributions of the charge state (a,b,c,d) and the ion density (e,f,g,h) of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions in the final stage of ion acceleration. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.2. 2D spatial distributions of the charge state (a,b,c,d) and the ion density (e,f,g,h) of Au, Pb, Bi and U ions in the final stage of ion acceleration. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g005
Figure 4.3. The energy spectra of Au ions recorded at the end of simulation (t = 240 fs): a) for all ions (black curves) and ions with high energies and high Z; b) for all ions in the paraxial beam (black curves) and ions with high energies and high Z in the beam. The paraxial beam was selected from the whole gold ion beam by a 5-µm diaphragm placed on the axis (y = +- 2.5 um) at a distance x = 30 µm from the target. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.3. The energy spectra of Au ions recorded at the end of simulation (t = 240 fs): a) for all ions (black curves) and ions with high energies and high Z; b) for all ions in the paraxial beam (black curves) and ions with high energies and high Z in the beam. The paraxial beam was selected from the whole gold ion beam by a 5-µm diaphragm placed on the axis (y = +- 2.5 um) at a distance x = 30 µm from the target. IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g006
Figure 4.4. The total energy carried by Au ions with charge state Z (a) as well as the mean (b) and maximum (c) energies of these ions for the whole ion beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red). IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.4. The total energy carried by Au ions with charge state Z (a) as well as the mean (b) and maximum (c) energies of these ions for the whole ion beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red). IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g007
Figure 4.5. The angular distributions of energy fluence (a) and mean energy (b) of Au ions for the whole beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red). IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.5. The angular distributions of energy fluence (a) and mean energy (b) of Au ions for the whole beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red). IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g008
Figure 4.6. The total number of ions Ni and the ion beam energy fluence (averaged over the aperture area) in the Au ion beam as a function of the beam-limiting aperture width dap . IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Figure 4.6. The total number of ions Ni and the ion beam energy fluence (averaged over the aperture area) in the Au ion beam as a function of the beam-limiting aperture width dap . IL = 1023 W/cm2.
Preprints 146812 g009
Figure 4.7. The dependence of the mean and maximum energy of Ne-like Au ions on the laser intensity for the whole beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red).
Figure 4.7. The dependence of the mean and maximum energy of Ne-like Au ions on the laser intensity for the whole beam (green) and the paraxial beam (red).
Preprints 146812 g010
Figure 4.8. The dependence of the Ne-like ions total energy and the laser-to-Ne-like ions energy conversion efficiency for the whole beam (a) and the paraxial beam (b).
Figure 4.8. The dependence of the Ne-like ions total energy and the laser-to-Ne-like ions energy conversion efficiency for the whole beam (a) and the paraxial beam (b).
Preprints 146812 g011
Figure 4.9. Energy spectra of Al, Ti, Cu, Ag and Au ions accelerated by a 1-ps laser pulse with an intensity of 5.2x1022 W/cm2 and energy of 200 kJ for a paraxial ion beam limited by a 50 µm aperture corresponding to the size of the compressed DT nuclear fuel.
Figure 4.9. Energy spectra of Al, Ti, Cu, Ag and Au ions accelerated by a 1-ps laser pulse with an intensity of 5.2x1022 W/cm2 and energy of 200 kJ for a paraxial ion beam limited by a 50 µm aperture corresponding to the size of the compressed DT nuclear fuel.
Preprints 146812 g012
Figure 4.10. The peak fluence and energy (a) as well as peak intensity and duration (b) of the Al, Ti, Cu, Ag and Au ion beams produced by a 1-ps laser pulse with an intensity of 5.2x1022 W/cm2 and energy of 200 kJ for a paraxial ion beam limited by a 50 µm aperture corresponding to the size of the compressed DT nuclear fuel.
Figure 4.10. The peak fluence and energy (a) as well as peak intensity and duration (b) of the Al, Ti, Cu, Ag and Au ion beams produced by a 1-ps laser pulse with an intensity of 5.2x1022 W/cm2 and energy of 200 kJ for a paraxial ion beam limited by a 50 µm aperture corresponding to the size of the compressed DT nuclear fuel.
Preprints 146812 g013
Table 3.1. Maximum charge states, Zmax, and maximum energies, Emax, of heavy ions accelerated backward by an ultrafast laser. IL, τL, and EL are the intensity, duration, and energy of the laser pulse, respectively.
Table 3.1. Maximum charge states, Zmax, and maximum energies, Emax, of heavy ions accelerated backward by an ultrafast laser. IL, τL, and EL are the intensity, duration, and energy of the laser pulse, respectively.
Element Zmax Emax ,
MeV
IL ,
1018 W/cm2
τL ,
ps
EL ,
J
References
207Pb82 46 430 50 1 50 [65]
197Au79 33 ~1 0.05 1 0.45 [63]
197Au79 26 >1 0.08 1 0.45 [64]
197Au79 ~10 ~0.45 20 0.025 ~1 [68,69]
181Ta73 38 ~1 0.08 1 0.45 [63]
108Ag47 29 0.9 0.05 1 0.5 [62]
106Pd46 30 400 200 1 120 [67]
64Cu29 13 ≥0.3 0.63 1 0.5 [61]
56Fe26 18 >0.2 0.05 1 0.45 [63]
56Fe26 650 200 0.7 400 [66]
Table 3.2. Maximum charge states, Zmax, and maximum energies, Emax, of heavy ions accelerated forward by an ultrafast laser. IL, τL, and EL are the intensity, duration, and energy of the laser pulse, respectively.
Table 3.2. Maximum charge states, Zmax, and maximum energies, Emax, of heavy ions accelerated forward by an ultrafast laser. IL, τL, and EL are the intensity, duration, and energy of the laser pulse, respectively.
Element Zmax Emax ,
GeV
IL ,
1020 W/cm2
τL ,
fs
EL ,
J
References
56Fe26 ~25 0.9 10 35 8 [70]
108Ag47 45 ≥2.2 50 40 12 [73]
197Au79 56 0.2 0.8 35 1.3 [71]
197Au79 ~50 ≥1 8 140 ~100 [72]
197Au79 61 1.1 110 22 15 [11]
197Au79 72 ≥1.4 4 500 185 [75]
197Au79 58 1.6 3-5 850 200 [76]
197Au79 51 2 3 800 175 [77]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated