Preprint
Brief Report

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Inactivated African Swine Fever Virus Vaccine Induces Safe and Efficient Immune Protection Through Mucosal Immunity

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

18 January 2025

Posted:

21 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: African swine fever (ASF) is among the most devastating viral diseases of pigs. Despite nearly a century of research, there is still no safe and effective vaccine available. The current situation is that either vaccines are safe but not effective, or they are effective but not safe. Findings: The ASF vaccine prepared using the inactivation method with ß-propiolactone provided 98.6% protection within 100 days after three intranasal immunizations, spaced 7 days apart. Conclusions: An inactivated vaccine made from complete African swine fever virus(ASFV) particles using β-propiolactone is safe and effective for controlling ASF through mucosal immunity.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Inactivated vaccines, representing the most classical approach in vaccine development, are theoretically considered the safest type of vaccines. However, injecting pigs with inactivated ASF vaccine only elicits a partial antibody response. Even with modern adjuvants, these antibodies can't effectively neutralize ASFV. This is because they're specific antibodies that can only recognize, not neutralize, the virus. As a result, they fail to neutralize ASFV as needed, causing a loss of protective efficacy[5]. To date, other types of ASF vaccines, including live attenuated vaccines, recombinant vaccines, subunit vaccine,and DNA vaccines, have yet to be developed successfully.
How can we solve the century-old problem?
We have developed an ASF vaccine utilizing the β-propiolactone inactivation method. Employing the β-propiolactone inactivation technique, the developed ASF vaccine with whole ASFV particles as antigens preserves envelope protein integrity for immunogenicity. The β-propiolactone-fragmented viral DNA ensures safety. In experiments, susceptible pigs given three-round mucosal immunization and then exposed to ASF-infected pigs show the vaccine's excellent anti-ASF prophylactic efficacy, as ASFV loads are reduced or cleared.

1. Our Method for Preparing Inactivated Vaccines Is As Follows:

① Improved sample processing. Sterilely collect liver and spleen tissues from typical African swine fever-infected pigs, remove fat and connective tissue, weigh them, grind thoroughly, mix with 1×PBS buffer solution at a ratio of 1:10, homogenize, freeze-thaw three times, centrifuge at 5000r/min for 15 minutes, take the supernatant, filter through a 0.45μm sterilizing filter, and set aside at 4 °C [6].
② viral load testing. ASFV real-time PCR Kit (Beijing MingRiDa Technology Development Co.,Ltd., Beijing, China) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The test results showed that the CT value of the prepared samples was less than 30.
③ Preparation of inactivated vaccines. Add 0.1% β-propiolactone to the viral suspension with a real-time PCR detection CT value less than 30, incubate at 4°Cwith shaking to inactivate, add another 0.1% β-propiolactone after 24 hours, inactivate for 96 hours, then hydrolyze β-propiolactone at 37 °C for 2 hours, and store at 4 °C [7].

2. Safety Testing:

After streaking the inactivated vaccine on a blood agar medium and incubating it at 37°C for 72 hours, no contaminants were detected. Subsequently, mucosal vaccination was performed on five healthy, non-immunized piglets. Each piglet was inoculated with 1 ml vaccine nasally and 10 ml orally every 7 days for 3 times. During the 30-day observation period, no adverse reactions or abnormal manifestations were noted in these piglets. This outcome demonstrates the outstanding safety of the vaccine [8].

3. Effective in Application:

One hundred and fifty ASFV-antigen-and-antibody-negative pigs, each weighing about 20 kg, were randomly divided into a 140-pig experimental group and a 10-pig control group.The experimental group received mucosal immunization with an inactivated vaccine: 1 ml intranasally and 3 ml orally per pig, administered every 7 days for 3 times. The control group was given 4 ml of PBS buffer per pig, following the same immunization schedule.After the three-round immunization, all 150 pigs were placed in an ASFV-infected pig farm. They were randomly penned in groups of 10. This setup enabled natural ASFV exposure through cohabitation with infected pigs, simulating a precise cross-infection scenario.The 100-day experiment included randomly sampling 5 pigs from each group every 10 days. Blood was centrifuged to obtain serum, which was pooled separately for each group for analysis. Real-time PCR was used to detect the ASFV viral load in the serum, and pen-level mortality was closely monitored.As presented in Table 1, the experimental group's viral load decreased steadily and vanished by the 70th day. By the end of the experiment, 98.6% of the experimental group pigs survived, with no adverse reactions or abnormalities. In contrast, the control group suffered 100% mortality within 25 days.

4. Discussion

The inactivated ASF vaccine, once judged ineffective upon injection, might induce elevated levels of secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) following mucosal immunization via means like nasal spraying and oral intake. Mucosal immunization with this vaccine not only achieves outstanding results but is also straightforward and safe. The century-old problem has been effortlessly solved.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe. Experiment was approved by Biomedical Ethics Committee of Chongqing Jingshengtian Biotechnology Co., Ltd, (No.): CQJSTAE2023-02.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due [REASON WHY DATA ARE NOT PUBLIC] but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all animal caretakers and technicians for their excellent work.

References

  1. DIXON L K,ABRAMS C C,BOWICK G, et al. African swine fever virus proteins involved in evading host defence systems[J]. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology.2004,100(3/4): 117-134.
  2. Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Order No. 53 of the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China [EB/OL]. ( 2005-06-24) [ 2021-06-30]. http://www. moa. gov. cn/ gk/ tzgg_ 1/bl/ 200506/ t20050627401699. htm.
  3. Global Ag Media. WOAH warns of swine fever vaccine risks as Vietnam readies exports[EB/OL].(2023-12-07)[2024-05-02]. https://www.thepigsite.com/news/2023/12/ woah-warns-of-swine-fever-vaccine-risks-as-vietnam-readies-exports.
  4. KOLBASOV D V,BAL YSHEV V M,SEREDA A D. Results of the development of live vaccines against African swine fever[J]. Veterinariya.2014,8:3-8.
  5. Blome S,Gabriel C,Beer M. Modern adjuvants do not enhance the efficacy of an inactivated African swine fever virus vaccine preparation [J]. Vaccine. 2014, 32(31): 3879-3882.
  6. Kai Wei,Zhenhong Sun, Zhengui Yan et al,.Effects of Taishan Pinus massoniana pollen polysaccharide on immune response of rabbit haemorrhagic disease tissue inactivated vaccine and on production performance of Rex rabbits[J]. Vaccine. 2011,29(14):2530-2536.
  7. Yutaka Sasaki,Naoto Yoshino,Shigehiro Sato et al,. Analysis of the beta-propiolactone sensitivity and optimization of inactivation methods for human influenza H3N2 virus[J]. J Virol Methods. 2016,235:105-111.
  8. Rachel A Crossley,Alyssa Matz,Terry Dew et al,. Safety Evaluation of Autologous Tissue Vaccine Cancer Immunotherapy in a Canine Model[J].Anticancer Res. 2019,39(4):1699-1703.
Table 1. Serum samples test results by real-time PCR for the viral load of ASFV.
Table 1. Serum samples test results by real-time PCR for the viral load of ASFV.
Group 20d 30d 40d 50d 60d 70d 80d 90d 100d
Experimental group 23.60 25.16 28.07 28.24 30.01 - - - -
Control group 29.99
Note: “-”: Negative; ”: No sample can be collected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated