Submitted:
14 January 2025
Posted:
15 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Ball Mill
1.2. Simulation Tools
1.3. Meshless Lagrangian methods
1.4. Mass-Momentum Coupling of the Fluid Phase
1.5. Numerical Methods for Fluid-Particle Coupling
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. SPH Formulation
2.2. DEM Theory
2.3. Coupling Strategy
- Calculate the SPH time step ;
- Update the neighbor list for SPH particles;
- Solve the SPH governing equations Eq. (6) and Eq. (7) for particles interaction involving fluid-rigid object and fluid-fluid;
- Obtain the fluid force and torque by Eq. (8) and Eq. (9) applied to the rigid body, and transmit to the DEM module together with the SPH time step;
- DEM particles search for neighbor particles and calculate contact forces and torque by Eq. (14) and Eq. (15);
- Apply and as external forces to get calculate acceleration and angular acceleration of DEM particles via Eq. (16) and Eq. (17);
- Update velocity, angular velocity, and position of DEM particles;
- Determine whether the DEM loop is complete: If not, continue from step 5 until the end; If so, the DEM particle information is sent to the coupling module;
- Update the SPH particles and rigid body information in SPH module, and the system is ready to calculate for the next SPH time step (If any).
2.4. Industrial-Scale Implementation
- Mass Balancing: This step ensured the integrity and accuracy of material flow data by verifying that the total mass entering the system matched the total mass exiting it, accounting for feed, product, and recirculating loads. Accurate mass balancing not only validated the dataset but also provided a solid foundation for subsequent model adjustments and simulations. This process identifies and rectifies any inconsistencies or errors in the data, ensuring that the analysis reflected true operating conditions.
- Model Fitting (Model Preparation for an Existing Overflow Ball Mill): The model was calibrated to accurately replicate the operation of the existing overflow ball mill configuration. Parameters such as grindability, size distribution, and power draw were adjusted to align with real-world performance. This step ensured that the baseline model provided a reliable reference point for evaluating the impact of the proposed modifications. The calibrated model acted as a benchmark, allowing direct comparison between the current and modified setups while minimizing uncertainties in performance predictions.
- Model Simulations (Grate Discharge): Simulating the modified grate discharge setup to evaluate performance changes and optimize the mill operations post-modifications.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Scenario: Overflow Configuration
3.1.1. Validation of the Mathematical Model and Numerical Methods
3.2. Trial Results
3.3. Energy Spectra Analysis
3.2. Slurry Pooling
3.2. Particularities of the Pulp Lifting System


3.2. Dead Zone
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MDPI | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| DOAJ | Directory of open access journals |
| DEM | Discrete element method |
| CFD | Computational Fluid Dynamics |
| SPH | Smooth particle hydrodynamics |
| BM | Ball mill |
| AG | Autogenous mill |
| SAG | Semi-autogenous mill |
| PSD | Particle size distribution |
| HC | Hydrocyclone |
| O/F | Overflow |
| U/F | Underflow |
| GD | Grate discharge |
| RPL | Radial pulp lifting system |
| CPL | Curved pulp lifting system |
| EEPL™ | Energy Efficient Pulp Lifting System™ |
| PSD | Particle size distribution |
| tph | Tonnage per hour |
| kW | Kilowatt |
| kWh | Kilowatt-hour |
| BWI | Bond work index |
| DCS | Distributed control system |
References
- J. J. Monaghan. “Simulating free surface flows with SPH”. Journal of Computational Physics 1994, 110, 399–406. [CrossRef]
- R. Vignjevic and J. Campbell. “Review of Development of the Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Method”. In: Predictive Modeling of Dynamic Processes: A Tribute to Professor Klaus Thoma. Ed. by Stefan Hiermaier. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009, pp. 367–396. ISBN: 978-1- 4419-0727-1.
- R. Fatehi and M. T. Manzari. “Error estimation in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and a new scheme for second derivatives”. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2011, 61, 482–498. [CrossRef]
- L.D. Libersky and A.G. Petschek. “Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials”. In: Advances in the Free-Lagrange Method Including Contributions on Adaptive Gridding and the Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Method. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1991, pp. 248–257.
- H. Takeda, S. M. Miyama, and M. Sekiya. “Numerical Simulation of Viscous Flow by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics”. In: Progress of Theoretical Physics 92.5 (Nov. 1994), pp. 939–960.
- A. Ferrari, M. Dumbser, E. F. Toro, and A. Armanini. “A new 3D parallel SPH scheme for free surface flows”. Computers and Fluids 2009, 38, 1203–1217. [CrossRef]
- S. Kulasegaram, J. Bonet, R. W. Lewis, and M. Profit. “A variational formulation based contact algorithm for rigid boundaries in two-dimensional SPH applications”. Computational Mechanics 2004, 33, 316–325. [CrossRef]
- R. A. Gingold and J.J. Monaghan. “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977, 181, 375–389. [CrossRef]
- R.H. Cole and I. Weller. “Underwater explosions and their application in simulations”. Journal of Fluid Dynamics 1977, 34, 214–227.
- A. V. Potapov, M. L. Hunt, and C. S. Campbell. “Liquid-solid flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and the discrete element method”. Powder Technology 2001, 116, 204–213. [CrossRef]
- J.M. Dominguez, G. Fourtakas, C. Altomare, R.B. Canelas, A. Tafuni, O. Garcia- Feal, et al., DualSPHysics: from fluid dynamics to multiphysics problems. Comput. Part. Mech. 2022, 9, 867–895. [CrossRef]
- A.J.C. Crespo, M. Gomez-Gesteira, R.A. Dalrymple, Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. CMC Comp. Mater. Continua. 2007, 5, 173–184.
- A. English, J.M. Dominguez, R. Vacondio, A.J.C. Crespo, P.K. Stansby, S.J. Lind, et al., Modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) for general-purpose smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): application to tank sloshing, dam break and fish pass problems. Comput. Part. Mech. 2022, 9, 911–925.
- B. Leimkuhler, C. Matthews (Eds.), Molecular Dynamics: With Deterministic and Stochastic Numerical Methods, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015, pp. 1–51.
- A.N. Parshikov, S.A. Medin, I.I. Loukashenko, V.A. Milekhin, Improvements in SPH method by means of interparticle contact algorithm and analysis of perforation tests at moderate projectile velocities. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2000, 24, 779–796. [CrossRef]
- J.J. Monaghan, A. Kos, Solitary waves on a Cretan beach. J. Waterway Port Coast. Ocean Eng. Asce. 1999, 125, 145–154. [CrossRef]
- F.Z. Xie, W.W. Zhao, D.C. Wan, MPS-DEM coupling method for interaction between fluid and thin elastic structures, Ocean Eng. 236 (2021).
- N. Govender, Study on the effect of grain morphology on shear strength in granular materials via GPU based discrete element method simulations. Powder Technol. 2021, 387, 336–347. [CrossRef]
- K. Kildashti, K.J. Dong, B. Samali, Q.J. Zheng, A.B. Yu, Evaluation of contact force models for discrete modelling of ellipsoidal particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 177, 1–17. [CrossRef]
- L. Liu, J. Wu, S.Y. Ji, DEM-SPH coupling method for the interaction between irregularly shaped granular materials and fluids, Powder Technol. 400 (2022.
- Z.H. Shen, G. Wang, D.R. Huang, F. Jin, A resolved CFD-DEM coupling model for modeling two-phase fluids interaction with irregularly shaped particles, J. Comput. Phys. 448 (2022).
- N. Govender, R.K. Rajamani, S. Kok, D.N. Wilke, Discrete element simulation of mill charge in 3D using the BLAZE-DEM GPU framework. Miner. Eng. 2015, 79, 152–168. [CrossRef]
- N. Govender, A DEM study on the thermal conduction of granular material in a rotating drum using polyhedral particles on GPUs, Chem. Eng. Sci. 252 (2022).
- B. Smeets, T. Odenthal, S. Vanmaercke, H. Ramon, Polygon-based contact description for modeling arbitrary polyhedra in the discrete element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2015, 290, 277–289. [CrossRef]
- R. Venugopal, 3D simulation of charge motion in tumbling mills by the discrete, Powder Technol. 115 (2001) 157–166.
- N. Govender, D.N. Wilke, C.-Y. Wu, R. Rajamani, J. Khinast, B.J. Glasser, Large-scale GPU based DEM modeling of mixing using irregularly shaped particles. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 2476–2490. [CrossRef]
- N. Govender, D.N. Wilke, P. Pizette, N.E. Abriak, A study of shape non-uniformity and poly-dispersity in hopper discharge of spherical and polyhedral particle systems using the Blaze-DEM GPU code, Appl. Math. Comput. 2018.
- S. Morrell. “Power draw of wet tumbling mills and its relationship to charge dynamics - Part 1: a continuum approach to mathematical modelling of mill power draw.” In: Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section C: Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy 105 (1996), pp. A9–A14.
- T.J. Napier-Munn et al. “Mineral Comminution Circuits: Their Operation and Optimization”. In: Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland (1996).
- H. Wendland, Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv. Comput. Math. 1995, 4, 389–396. [CrossRef]
- M. Capece, E. Bilgili, R. Dave, Insight into first-order breakage kinetics using a particle-scale breakage rate constant, Chem. Eng. Sci. 117 (2014) 318–330.
- Latchireddi, S. R., Morrell, S. Influence of discharge pulp lifter design on slurry flow in mills. Paper presented at the Mining Millennium 2000 Conference, Toronto, Canada (2000, March).
- Latchireddi, S., Morrell, S. (1997). A laboratory study of the performance characteristics of mill pulp lifters. Minerals Engineering, 10(11), 1221-1231.
- Burgess, D. , 1989. High or low aspect - which one? SAG Milling Conference (Ed. Stockton, N.D.), Murdock University: 132-170.
- Cleary, P. W., Sinnott, M., & Morrison, R. (2006). Prediction of slurry transport in SAG mills using SPH fluid flow in a dynamic DEM based porous media. Minerals Engineering, 19(15), 1517-1527.
- Cleary, P. W. , & Morrison, R. D. (2012). Prediction of 3D slurry flow within the grinding chamber and discharge from a pilot scale SAG mill. *Minerals Engineering, 39, 184-198.
- Cleary, P. W., Morrison, R. D., & Sinnott, M. D. Prediction of slurry grinding due to media and coarse rock interactions in a 3D pilot SAG mill using a coupled DEM+SPH model. Minerals Engineering, 2020, 157, 106614.
- Cleary, P. W. , Cummins, S. J., & Sinnott, M. D. Advanced comminution modelling: Part 2-Mills. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 89, 640–670. [Google Scholar]



















| Sample | BM-5 (Overflow) Discharge of BM | BM-6 (Trial GD) Discharge of BM | BM-5 (Overflow) Cyclone O/F | BM-6 (Trial GD)Cyclone O/F |
| A | 295.10 | 298.15 | 69.22 | 65.63 |
| B | 295.86 | 302.12 | 65.89 | 69.85 |
| C | 302.59 | 301.55 | 66.81 | 65.64 |
| D | 299.57 | 300.92 | 66.84 | 66.76 |
| E | 304.51 | 293.19 | 67.65 | 67.46 |
| F | 293.31 | 298.43 | 68.09 | 67.89 |
| G | 288.73 | 292.72 | 68.64 | 67.95 |
| H | 294.91 | 296.22 | 69.15 | 68.64 |
| I | 300.49 | 297.74 | 69.69 | 69.12 |
| J | 286.50 | 296.78 | 70.59 | 70.61 |
| Pulp Lifter Size | Percent Ratio |
| Small | 3.7 |
| Medium | 6.8 |
| Large | 9.9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).