Submitted:
10 January 2025
Posted:
14 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Quantifying the rates of soil evolution greatly benefits our understanding of soil formation and management, especially in the context of strong anthropogenic activities and climate change. This study investigated soil evolution in an artificial oasis region with a reclamation history of more than 50 years, and critical soil properties were measured at 77 sites. A total of 462 soil samples were collected down to a depth of 1 m. A total of seven critical soil properties were analysed, and four (i.e., soil organic carbon (SOC), total phosphorus (TP), pH, and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+)), which were not closely correlated with each other, were selected for further investigation. Through comparison with desert soils, this investigation found that semicentennial cultivation resulted in significant changes in soil properties, with strong vertical variations, including increases in the C, N and P contents and decreases in pH throughout the whole profile. The temperature, clay content, evaporation rate between the topsoil and subsoil, low vegetation cover, cotton lateral roots, irrigation and fertilization played crucial roles in promoting SOC decomposition and reducing soil alkalinity, thereby contributing to rapid soil evolution. Thus, reclaimed desert soil was scientifically confirmed to be suitable for agricultural use, which will ease the food production crisis, protect the environment, and promote soil evolution. Furthermore, three-dimensional digital soil mapping was performed to investigate the effects of long-term cultivation on the distributions of soil properties at unvisited sites. The soil depth functions were separately fitted to model the vertical variation in the soil properties, including the exponential function, power function, logarithmic function and cubic polynomial function, and the parameters were extrapolated to unvisited sites via the quantile regression forest (QRF), boosted regression tree and multiple linear regression techniques. The QRF technique yielded the best performance for SOC (R2= 0.78 and RMSE = 0.62), TP (R2 = 0.79 and RMSE = 0.12), pH (R2 = 0.78 and RMSE = 0.10) and NH4+ (R2 = 0.71 and RMSE = 0.38). The results showed that depth function coupled with machine learning methods can predict the spatial distribution of soil properties in arid areas efficiently and accurately. These research conclusions will lead to more effective targeted measures and guarantees for local agricultural development and food security.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
2.2. Experimental Design and Soil Sampling
2.3. Analysis of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties
2.4. Environmental Covariates
2.5. Modeling Approaches
2.6. Statistical and Validation Strategy
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Correlation Analysis and Descriptive Statistics


3.2. Optimal Depth Functions Selection
3.3. Model Performance
3.4. Confidence Interval of Prediction
4. Conclusions
Funding
References
- Aksoy. (2012). Digital Soil Assessments and Beyond, 7 October.
- Allory, V. , Séré, G., & Ouvrard, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of carbon content and stocks in Technosols and identification of the main governing factors. European Journal of Soil Science, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrouays, D. , McBratney, A., Bouma, J., Libohova, Z., Richer-de-Forges, A. C., Morgan, C. L. S., et al. (2020). Impressions of digital soil maps: The good, the not so good, and making them ever better. Geoderma Regional, 0025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASF Data Search. (n.d.). https://search.asf.alaska.edu/#/. 6 October.
- Azamat, S. , Ilgiz, A., Ruslan, S., Mirsayapov, R., Ilyusya, G., Tuktarova, I., & Belan, L. (2024). Assessing and mapping of soil organic carbon at multiple depths in the semi-arid Trans-Ural steppe zone. Geoderma Regional. [CrossRef]
- Bacq-Labreuil, A. , Neal, A. L., Crawford, J., Mooney, S. J., Akkari, E., Zhang, X., et al. (2021). Significant structural evolution of a long-term fallow soil in response to agricultural management practices requires at least 10 years after conversion. European Journal of Soil Science. [CrossRef]
- Bishop, T. F. A. , McBratney, A. B., & Laslett, G. M. (1999). Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Cao, Q. , Li, J., Wang, G., Wang, D., Xin, Z., Xiao, H., & Zhang, K. (2021). On the spatial variability and influencing factors of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in a desert oasis ecotone of northwestern China. ( 206, 105533. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L. , He, Z., Zhao, W., Liu, J., Zhou, H., Li, J., et al. (2020). Soil structure and nutrient supply drive changes in soil microbial communities during conversion of virgin desert soil to irrigated cropland. ( 71(4), 768–781. [CrossRef]
- Draper, N. , & Smith. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis, 7 October.
- Fallahzade, J. , Karimi, A., Naderi, M., & Shirani, H. (2020). Soil mechanical properties and wind erosion following conversion of desert to irrigated croplands in central Iran. ( 204, 104665. [CrossRef]
- Fu, P. , Clanton, C., Demuth, K. M., Goodman, V., Griffith, L., Khim-Young, M., et al. (2024). Accurate Quantification of 0–30 cm Soil Organic Carbon in Croplands over the Continental United States Using Machine Learning. Remote Sensing, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamalero, E. , Bona, E., Todeschini, V., & Lingua, G. (2020). Saline and Arid Soils: Impact on Bacteria, Plants, and Their Interaction. Biology. [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y. , Pan, S., Zhang, L., Qiu, J., He, K., Gao, H., et al. (2022). Phosphorus biogeochemistry regulated by carbonates in soil. ( 214, 113894. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Genuer, R. , Poggi, J.-M., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2010). Variable selection using random forests. ( 31(14), 2225–2236. [CrossRef]
- Guo, B. , Wei, C., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J., Meng, C., & Cai, Y. (2022). The dominant influencing factors of desertification changes in the source region of Yellow River: Climate change or human activity? Science of The Total Environment. [CrossRef]
- Hachmi, A. , Andich, K., Alaoui-Faris, F. E. E., & Mahyou, H. (2018). Amélioration de l’état de la végétation et de la fertilité des sols des parcours arides du Maroc par les techniques de restauration et de réhabilitation. Revue d’Écologie.
- Hall, E. K. , Maixner, F., Franklin, O., Daims, H., Richter, A., & Battin, T. (2011). Linking Microbial and Ecosystem Ecology Using Ecological Stoichiometry: A Synthesis of Conceptual and Empirical Approaches. Ecosystems. [CrossRef]
- Heuvelink, G. B. M. , & Webster, R. (2022). Spatial statistics and soil mapping: A blossoming partnership under pressure. Spatial Statistics. [CrossRef]
- Hua, F. , Xudong, P., Yuyi, L., Fu, C., & Fenghua, Z. (2008). Evaluation of Soil Environment after Saline Soil Reclamation of Xinjiang Oasis, China. ( 100(3), 471–476. [CrossRef]
- Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology, 19 September.
- Kang, J. , Liu, L., Zhang, F., Shen, C., Wang, N., & Shao, L. (2021). Semantic segmentation model of cotton roots in-situ image based on attention mechanism. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. [CrossRef]
- Li, F.-R. , Liu, J.-L., Ren, W., & Liu, L.-L. (2018). Land-use change alters patterns of soil biodiversity in arid lands of northwestern China. Plant and Soil. [CrossRef]
- Li, X. , Xie, J., Zhang, Q., Lyu, M., Xiong, X., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Substrate availability and soil microbes drive temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon mineralization to warming along an elevation gradient in subtropical Asia. ( 364, 114198. [CrossRef]
- Lian, X. , Piao, S., Chen, A., Huntingford, C., Fu, B., Li, L. Z. X., et al. (2021). Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. [CrossRef]
- Liaw, A. , & Wiener, M. ( 2002). Classification and Regression by randomForest, 2.
- Liu, Z. , Cao, S., Sun, Z., Wang, H., Qu, S., Lei, N., et al. (2021). Tillage effects on soil properties and crop yield after land reclamation. ( 11(1), 4611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, D. , Wang, L., Nan, H., Cao, Y., Wang, H., Kumar, T. V., & Wang, C. (2023). Phosphorus adsorption by functionalized biochar: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. [CrossRef]
- Ma, D. , He, Z., Ju, W., Zhao, W., Zhao, P., Wang, W., & Lin, P. (2024). Long-term conventional cultivation after desert reclamation is not conducive to the improvement of soil carbon pool and nutrient stocks, a case study from northwest China. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Maestre, F. T. , Benito, B. M., Berdugo, M., Concostrina-Zubiri, L., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Eldridge, D. J., et al. (2021). Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytologist. [CrossRef]
- Man, M. , Wagner-Riddle, C., Dunfield, K. E., Deen, B., & Simpson, M. J. (2021). Long-term crop rotation and different tillage practices alter soil organic matter composition and degradation. Soil and Tillage Research. [CrossRef]
- Mbagwu, J. S. C. , & Abeh, O. G. (1998). PREDICTION OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF TROPICAL SOILS USING INTRINSIC PEDOLOGICAL PARAMETERS. G. ( 163(2), 93.
- McBratney, A. B. , Mendonça Santos, M. L., & Minasny, B. (2003). On digital soil mapping. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Meinshausen, N. (n.d.). Quantile Regression Forests.
- Mihi, A. , Tarai, N., & Chenchouni, H. (2019). Can palm date plantations and oasification be used as a proxy to fight sustainably against desertification and sand encroachment in hot drylands? Ecological Indicators. [CrossRef]
- Minasny, B. (2006). Prediction and digital mapping of soil carbon storage in the Lower Namoi Valley. https://www.publish.csiro.au/sr/SR05136. 19 September.
- Minasny, B. , & McBratney, Alex. B. (2016). Digital soil mapping: A brief history and some lessons. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Myles, A. J. , Feudale, R. N., Liu, Y., Woody, N. A., & Brown, S. D. (2004). An introduction to decision tree modeling. D. ( 18(6), 275–285. [CrossRef]
- Nauman, T. W. , & Thompson, J. A. (2014). Semi-automated disaggregation of conventional soil maps using knowledge driven data mining and classification trees. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Nelson, D. w. , & Sommers, L. e. (1982). Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis (pp. 539–579). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Parkinson, J. A. , & Allen, S. E. (1975). A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. E. ( 6(1), 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Peng, L. , Wan, Y.-B., Li, H., Du, M.-D., & Shi, Q.-D. (2024). Influence of surface water and groundwater gradient on spatial distribution of typical vegetation in the hinterland of Taklamakan desert. ( 953, 176060. [CrossRef]
- Poggio, L. , de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., & Rossiter, D. (2021). SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL. [CrossRef]
- Poggio, L. , & Gimona, A. (2014). National scale 3D modelling of soil organic carbon stocks with uncertainty propagation — An example from Scotland. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y. , Zhang, B., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2024). Analysis of spatial-temporal patterns and driving mechanisms of land desertification in China. Science of The Total Environment. [CrossRef]
- Shang, Z. H. , Cao, J. J., Degen, A. A., Zhang, D. W., & Long, R. J. (2019). A four year study in a desert land area on the effect of irrigated, cultivated land and abandoned cropland on soil biological, chemical and physical properties. J. ( 175, 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Shao, W. , Wang, Q., Guan, Q., Luo, H., Ma, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Distribution of soil available nutrients and their response to environmental factors based on path analysis model in arid and semi-arid area of northwest China. Science of The Total Environment. [CrossRef]
- Sinsabaugh, R. L. , Hill, B. H., & Follstad Shah, J. J. (2009). Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. J. ( 462(7274), 795–798. [CrossRef]
- Song, W. , Li, J., Li, X., Xu, D., & Min, X. (2024). Effects of land reclamation on soil organic carbon and its components in reclaimed coal mining subsidence areas. ( 908, 168523. [CrossRef]
- Su, Y. Z. , Yang, R., Liu, W. J., & Wang, X. F. (2010). Evolution of Soil Structure and Fertility After Conversion of Native Sandy Desert Soil to Irrigated Cropland in Arid Region, China. F. ( 175(5), 246. [CrossRef]
- Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R. , Minasny, B., Sarmadian, F., & Malone, B. P. (2014). Digital mapping of soil salinity in Ardakan region, central Iran. P. ( 213, 15–28. [CrossRef]
- Wang, C. , Morrissey, E. M., Mau, R. L., Hayer, M., Piñeiro, J., Mack, M. C., et al. (2021). The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization. The ISME Journal, 2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. P. , Law, R. M., & Pak, B. (2010). A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere. ( 7(7), 2261–2282. [CrossRef]
- Wei, W. , Guo, Z., Shi, P., Zhou, L., Wang, X., Li, Z., et al. (2021). Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in northwest China from 2000 to 2017. ( 31(1), 46–68. [CrossRef]
- Wiesmeier, M. , Barthold, F., Blank, B., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011). Digital mapping of soil organic matter stocks using Random Forest modeling in a semi-arid steppe ecosystem. Plant and Soil. [CrossRef]
- Yahaya, S. M. , Mahmud, A. A., Abdullahi, M., & Haruna, A. (2023). Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: A review. Pedosphere. [CrossRef]
- Yu, H. , Sui, Y., Chen, Y., Bao, T., & Jiao, X. (2022). Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization and Its Temperature Sensitivity under Different Substrate Levels in the Mollisols of Northeast China. ( 12(5), 712. [CrossRef]
- Zeraatpisheh, M. , Ayoubi, S., Jafari, A., Tajik, S., & Finke, P. (2019). Digital mapping of soil properties using multiple machine learning in a semi-arid region, central Iran. Geoderma. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F. , Chen, X., Yao, S., Ye, Y., & Zhang, B. (2022). Responses of soil mineral-associated and particulate organic carbon to carbon input: A meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y. , Biswas, A., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2017). Implementation of a sigmoid depth function to describe change of soil pH with depth. I. ( 289, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z. , Dong, X., Wang, S., & Pu, X. (2020). Benefits of organic manure combined with biochar amendments to cotton root growth and yield under continuous cropping systems in Xinjiang, China. ( 10(1), 4718. [CrossRef]






| Soil property |
Depth (cm) |
Maxa | Min | Mean | Standard deviation |
COV | Kurtosis | Skewness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC (g/kg) |
0-10 | 8.35 | 1.34 | 4.49 | 1.40 | 31.28 | -0.17 | 0.19 |
| 10-20 | 7.33 | 1.26 | 4.19 | 1.38 | 32.92 | -0.49 | 0.05 | |
| 20-40 | 6.82 | 0.89 | 3.61 | 1.29 | 35.72 | -0.24 | 0.19 | |
| 40-60 | 5.28 | 0.93 | 2.69 | 1.15 | 42.72 | -0.67 | 0.40 | |
| 60-80 | 5.14 | 0.92 | 2.31 | 0.93 | 40.31 | -0.01 | 0.71 | |
| 80-100 | 4.07 | 1.06 | 2.19 | 0.78 | 35.45 | -0.26 | 0.74 | |
| pH | 0-10 | 9.43 | 8.36 | 8.83 | 0.24 | 2.67 | -0.27 | 0.31 |
| 10-20 | 9.41 | 8.09 | 8.86 | 0.28 | 3.11 | -0.18 | 0.00 | |
| 20-40 | 9.42 | 8.34 | 8.91 | 0.25 | 2.75 | -0.24 | -0.08 | |
| 40-60 | 9.54 | 8.48 | 8.99 | 0.23 | 2.58 | -0.29 | -0.06 | |
| 60-80 | 9.57 | 8.45 | 9.02 | 0.25 | 2.82 | -0.34 | -0.29 | |
| 80-100 | 9.59 | 8.38 | 9.07 | 0.23 | 2.54 | 0.46 | -0.06 | |
| NH4+ (mg/kg) |
0-10 | 6.04 | 1.88 | 3.06 | 0.83 | 27.18 | 1.88 | 1.27 |
| 10-20 | 7.04 | 1.27 | 2.80 | 0.87 | 30.94 | 7.22 | 1.95 | |
| 20-40 | 8.38 | 1.23 | 2.43 | 1.19 | 48.94 | 11.98 | 3.19 | |
| 40-60 | 9.80 | 0.98 | 2.07 | 1.05 | 50.62 | 40.99 | 5.66 | |
| 60-80 | 9.18 | 1.14 | 2.33 | 1.12 | 48.31 | 18.30 | 3.49 | |
| 80-100 | 10.25 | 1.16 | 2.48 | 1.52 | 61.27 | 13.13 | 3.40 | |
| TP (g/kg) |
0-10 | 2.40 | 0.54 | 1.04 | 0.28 | 26.76 | 7.90 | 2.31 |
| 10-20 | 2.87 | 0.60 | 1.05 | 0.36 | 34.33 | 11.98 | 3.15 | |
| 20-40 | 1.46 | 0.61 | 0.90 | 0.14 | 15.32 | 3.10 | 0.87 | |
| 40-60 | 1.12 | 0.51 | 0.78 | 0.12 | 15.69 | 0.41 | 0.61 | |
| 60-80 | 0.98 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.11 | 14.93 | -0.06 | -0.23 | |
| 80-100 | 1.73 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.16 | 22.21 | 26.13 | 3.99 | |
| CEC (c mol/kg)) |
0-10 | 6.87 | 0.91 | 2.89 | 1.25 | 43.15 | 1.16 | 1.10 |
| 10-20 | 6.26 | 0.81 | 2.81 | 1.12 | 39.99 | 1.17 | 1.02 | |
| 20-40 | 6.06 | 0.81 | 2.74 | 1.18 | 43.23 | 0.40 | 0.86 | |
| 40-60 | 7.37 | 0.91 | 2.48 | 1.29 | 52.20 | 2.31 | 1.45 | |
| 60-80 | 6.36 | 0.51 | 2.53 | 1.56 | 61.40 | 0.04 | 1.14 | |
| 80-100 | 7.37 | 1.01 | 2.43 | 1.42 | 58.42 | 3.07 | 1.87 | |
| TN (g/kg) |
0-10 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.15 | 35.29 | -0.62 | 0.07 |
| 10-20 | 0.75 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 39.85 | -0.36 | 0.12 | |
| 20-40 | 0.71 | 0.05 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 43.10 | 0.12 | 0.43 | |
| 40-60 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 53.89 | -0.56 | 0.69 | |
| 60-80 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 54.43 | -0.10 | 0.96 | |
| 80-100 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 43.57 | 0.47 | 1.06 | |
| TK (g/kg) |
0-10 | 24.04 | 16.23 | 19.74 | 1.55 | 7.84 | -0.04 | 0.24 |
| 10-20 | 24.47 | 15.59 | 19.72 | 1.74 | 8.81 | 0.28 | 0.20 | |
| 20-40 | 26.36 | 12.87 | 19.75 | 2.23 | 11.29 | 1.37 | 0.04 | |
| 40-60 | 25.78 | 15.46 | 20.23 | 2.20 | 10.87 | 0.44 | 0.45 | |
| 60-80 | 27.37 | 14.05 | 20.48 | 2.46 | 12.01 | 0.53 | 0.21 | |
| 80-100 | 30.95 | 14.29 | 20.27 | 2.77 | 13.68 | 4.05 |
| Soil property | Depth (cm) | Max | Min | Mean | SD | COV | Kurt | Skew |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC (g/kg) |
0-10 | 4.90 | 0.50 | 3.32 | 1.54 | 46.46 | 0.79 | -1.06 |
| 10-20 | 4.90 | 1.70 | 2.97 | 1.02 | 34.24 | 2.01 | 1.07 | |
| 20-40 | 5.10 | 1.20 | 3.18 | 1.27 | 39.76 | 0.24 | -0.07 | |
| 40-60 | 4.40 | 1.10 | 2.23 | 1.09 | 48.97 | 2.46 | 1.50 | |
| 60-80 | 4.90 | 2.10 | 3.15 | 0.95 | 30.27 | 0.91 | 1.05 | |
| 80-100 | 4.60 | 0.50 | 2.37 | 1.51 | 63.87 | -0.85 | -0.01 | |
| pH | 0-10 | 9.39 | 8.06 | 8.91 | 0.43 | 4.78 | 2.94 | -1.43 |
| 10-20 | 9.25 | 8.90 | 9.07 | 0.12 | 1.36 | -0.81 | 0.20 | |
| 20-40 | 9.38 | 8.91 | 9.03 | 0.16 | 1.79 | 5.54 | 2.28 | |
| 40-60 | 9.36 | 8.66 | 9.02 | 0.26 | 2.87 | -1.26 | 0.05 | |
| 60-80 | 9.31 | 8.56 | 9.03 | 0.27 | 2.94 | 0.35 | -0.93 | |
| 80-100 | 9.41 | 8.70 | 9.11 | 0.25 | 2.73 | -0.15 | -0.43 | |
| NH4+ (mg/kg) |
0-10 | 1.51 | 0.16 | 0.60 | 0.46 | 76.52 | 2.50 | 1.54 |
| 10-20 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 67.11 | -1.01 | 0.96 | |
| 20-40 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.19 | 32.73 | -1.10 | 0.55 | |
| 40-60 | 1.68 | 0.22 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 62.71 | 1.89 | 1.30 | |
| 60-80 | 0.83 | 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 51.65 | 4.15 | 1.62 | |
| 80-100 | 1.01 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.22 | 36.58 | 1.97 | 1.28 | |
| TP (g/kg) |
0-10 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 2.96 | 1.99 | 1.20 |
| 10-20 | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.03 | 6.15 | 1.73 | 0.05 | |
| 20-40 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 2.94 | 0.75 | 0.46 | |
| 40-60 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.03 | 5.56 | 2.04 | -1.45 | |
| 60-80 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.03 | 6.57 | 3.22 | -0.82 | |
| 80-100 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.06 | 10.63 | 2.06 | -0.43 | |
| CEC (c mol/kg)) |
0-10 | 3.00 | 2.10 | 2.60 | 0.33 | 12.87 | -0.78 | -0.46 |
| 10-20 | 3.00 | 2.10 | 2.52 | 0.35 | 14.09 | -1.10 | -0.12 | |
| 20-40 | 3.60 | 1.90 | 2.55 | 0.63 | 24.90 | 0.23 | 0.64 | |
| 40-60 | 2.70 | 2.20 | 2.45 | 0.19 | 7.64 | -1.20 | 0.00 | |
| 60-80 | 2.90 | 2.20 | 2.53 | 0.27 | 10.79 | -1.82 | 0.07 | |
| 80-100 | 2.90 | 2.40 | 2.68 | 0.22 | 8.31 | -1.81 | -0.60 | |
| TN (g/kg) |
0-10 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 33.18 | 2.71 | 1.14 |
| 10-20 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 18.26 | 2.50 | 1.00 | |
| 20-40 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 31.10 | 1.14 | 0.72 | |
| 40-60 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 62.15 | 1.18 | 0.14 | |
| 60-80 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 50.74 | -1.22 | 0.48 | |
| 80-100 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 43.80 | -3.13 | 0.00 | |
| TK (g/kg) |
0-10 | 16.90 | 14.70 | 15.70 | 0.88 | 5.58 | -1.81 | 0.27 |
| 10-20 | 16.90 | 15.60 | 16.15 | 0.53 | 3.29 | -1.83 | 0.31 | |
| 20-40 | 17.00 | 16.20 | 16.50 | 0.33 | 2.03 | -1.32 | 0.53 | |
| 40-60 | 17.70 | 15.90 | 17.18 | 0.65 | 3.78 | 4.77 | -1.54 | |
| 60-80 | 16.90 | 14.90 | 16.07 | 0.73 | 4.57 | -0.11 | -0.47 | |
| 80-100 | 17.00 | 15.30 | 16.17 | 0.71 | 4.37 | -2.14 | 0.06 |
| Soil property | Type of depth function | R2 | RMSE | MAE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC (g/kg) |
A*ek*depth | 0.87 | 0.54 | 0.45 |
| B+A* ek*depth | 0.90 | 0.46 | 0.39 | |
| A+k*ln(-depth+1) | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.46 | |
| pH | A+B*depth3+C*depth2+D*depth | 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| A*ek*depth | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| A+k*ln(-depth+1) | 0.77 | 0.10 | 0.08 | |
| NH4+ (mg/kg) |
A*(-depth)k | 0.20 | 1.12 | 0.82 |
| A+k*ln(-depth+1) | 0.57 | 0.77 | 0.45 | |
| B+A* ek*depth | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.40 | |
| A*ek*depth | 0.56 | 0.78 | 0.45 | |
| A+B*depth3+C*depth2+D*depth | 0.89 | 0.38 | 0.25 | |
| TP (g/kg) |
A+k*ln(-depth+1) | 0.67 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| B+A* ek*depth | 0.77 | 0.12 | 0.08 | |
| A*ek*depth | 0.70 | 0.14 | 0.08 |
| Soil property | Type of model | R2 | RMSE | MAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC (g/kg) |
QRF | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.51 | |
| BRT | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.47 | ||
| MLR | 0.13 | 1.36 | 1.04 | ||
| pH | QRF | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
| BRT | 0.76 | 0.10 | 0.07 | ||
| MLR | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.17 | ||
| NH4+ (mg/kg) |
QRF | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.28 | |
| BRT | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.29 | ||
| MLR | 0.19 | 0.80 | 0.64 | ||
| TP (g/kg) |
QRF | 0.71 | 0.12 | 0.08 | |
| BRT | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.09 | ||
| MLR | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.17 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).