Submitted:
09 January 2025
Posted:
13 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
In this paper, we developed our own software that can analyze piano performance by utilizing short-time Fourier transform, non-negative matrix decomposition, and root mean square. In addition, for the reliability of the developed software, we provided results reflecting the characteristics of various performers and signal analysis. In conclusion, it shows the possibility that musical flow and waveform analysis can be visually interpreted in various ways. Based on this, we were also able to derive an additional approach suitable for designing the system to seamlessly connect hearing and vision.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Necessity Needs for Analytical Tools
2.1. Understanding the Basic Components of Music
2.2. Instruments and Timbre Analysis
2.3. Understanding the Emotional Elements of Music
2.4. A Structural Analysis of Music
2.5. Support for Music Production and Mixing
2.6. Music Learning and Research
2.7. Improved Listening Experience
3. Prior studies
3.1. A Way of Expressing Sound
3.2. Traditional Method of Sound Analysis
3.3. The Characteristics of Piano Sound
3.4. Characteristics of Classical Piano Music
4. Method
4.1. Mathematical Techniques
4.1.1. Short-time Fourier Transform (STFT)
4.1.2. Autocorrelation
4.1.3. Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF)
4.2. Physical Tools
4.3. The Specifications of a Piano
4.4. Characteristics of Performed Music and Performers Characteristics
4.4.1. Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star
4.4.2. Gavotte Composed by Cornelius Gurlitt
4.4.3. Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto No. 2 in c Minor, Op. 18
4.4.3. Characteristics of Performers
5. Results
5.1. Magnitude of Sounds
5.2. Velocity
5.3. Touch Intensity

5.4. Music Flow
6. Discussion
7. Future Works
7.1. Overcome the Difference Between Soundproof Room and Hall

APPENDIX: Musical Terminology
References
- D. Arfib. Digital synthesis of complex spectra by means of multiplication of nonlinear distorted sine waves. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 1979, 27, 757–768. [Google Scholar]
- B. Bank. Nonlinear interaction in the digital waveguide with the application to piano sound synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 54–57, Berlin, Germany, September 2000a.
- B. Bank and V. Välimäki. Robust loss filter design for digital waveguide synthesis. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2003, 10, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- J. Bensa, S. Bilbao, R. Kronland-Martinet, and J. O. Smith. The simulation of piano string vibration: From physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 114, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- J. Berthaut, M. N. Ichchou, and L. Jézéquel. Piano soundboard: Structural behaviour, numerical and experimental study in the modal range. Applied Acoustics 2003, 64, 1113–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- G. Borin, G. De Poli, and D. Rocchesso. Elimination of delay-free loops in discrete-time models of nonlinear acoustic systems. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2000, 8, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- C. Cadoz, A. Luciani, and J. Florens. Responsive input devices and sound synthesis by simulation of instrumental mechanisms: The CORDIS system. Computer Music Journal 1983, 8, 60–73. [Google Scholar]
- A. Chaigne and A. Askenfelt. Numerical simulations of piano strings. I. A physical model for a struck string using finite difference methods. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2):1112–1118, 1994a.
- Chaigne and A. Askenfelt. Numerical simulations of piano strings. II. Comparisons with measurements and systematic exploration of some hammer-string parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3):1631–1640, 1994b.
- J. M. Chowning. The synthesis of complex audio spectra by means of frequency modulation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 21(7):526–534, 1973.
- H. A. Conklin. Piano design factors — their influence on tone and acoustical performance. In A. Askenfelt, editor, Five Lectures on the Acoustics of the Piano. Kungliga Musikaliska Akademien, Stockholm, Sweden, 1990.
- H. A. Conklin. Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. Part I. Piano hammers and tonal effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(6):3286–3296, 1996a.
- H. A. Conklin. Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. Part II. Piano structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(2):695–708, 1996b.
- A. Fettweis. Wave digital filters. Proceedings of the IEEE, 74(2):270–327, 1986.
- J. L. Flanagan and R. M. Golden. Phase vocoder. The Bell System Technical Journal, 45: 1493–1509, 1966.
- H. Fletcher, E. D. Blackham, and R. Stratton. Quality of piano tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(6):749–761, 1962.
- K. Karplus and A. Strong. Digital synthesis of plucked-string and drum timbres. Computer Music Journal, 7(2):43–55, 1983.
- J. Laroche and J.-L. Meillier. Multichannel excitation/filter modeling of percussive sounds with application to the piano. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2(2): 329–344, 1994.
- M. Le Brun. Digital waveshaping synthesis. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 27 (4):250–266, 1979.









Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).